What David Beckham really thinks about being 50 as Man Utd legend lands new World Cup role

David Beckham, a former England and Manchester United star, has made an announcement about his new role ahead of the 2026 World Cup, insisting that he is not concerned about turning 50.

Sir David Beckham is showing no signs of slowing down after turning 50 as the Manchester United legend takes on a new role ahead of the 2026 World Cup. The former England captain has kept himself extremely busy since retiring from playing in 2013.

He has worked on charitable causes through a number of different campaigns, launched several brands, continued his modelling career and even formed his own football team, Inter Miami.

The recognizable No. Before the World Cup begins in the USA, Mexico, and Canada in the following year, 7 has now collaborated with Verizon, the official telecommunications partner of the World Cup. The scheme will offer its customers a large number of complimentary match tickets, and hundreds more will get to enjoy pitchside access during the competition.

Beckham is certainly showing no signs of kicking back and relaxing just yet, despite turning 50 in May. Speaking to Men’s Health about reaching that milestone earlier this year, the United hero explained: “It doesn’t bother me one bit. People are asking me about it gently, like it should be a big issue.

As long as I’m healthy, fit, and my family is healthy, that’s all I care about, not worrying about it. I’m going to keep it very simple for my 50th birthday. That’s it, I want good food and wine. All of my closest friends.

READ MORE: Man Utd were close to signing World Cup winner who won Ballon d’OrREAD MORE: Ryan Giggs career update as Man Utd legend ‘no longer involved’ at EFL club

Following a legendary career spanning over 600 matches for club and country, Beckham has ventured into a number of different pursuits. One such venture included founding MLS side Inter Miami in 2018, which began competing in 2020 and has since attracted superstars including Lionel Messi.

The father of four also launched his eponymous Netflix documentary series in 2023, reflecting on his playing days and personal life. In the same popular documentary, he revealed an unexpected hobby by mentioning his newfound love of beekeeping, which he took up during the Covid-19 lockdown.

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

Beckham’s honey-based snack brand, Bee Up, was the first to expand on that interest this year. Boxes of the snacks, which are intended for kids as a superfood substitute for sweets, have recently been offered on Target’s shelves.

He asserted that “my passion for honey and beekeeping quickly developed into a passion.” I collaborated with my sons to construct the hives, learned how to take care of bees, and became an expert at capturing one of nature’s most potent superfoods.

Of course, his long list of off-the-field pursuits are not for want of money. According to the 2025 Sunday Times Rich List, Beckham and his wife, former Spice Girl Victoria, have a staggering combined total fortune of £500million.

Business Insider reports that the former Real Madrid Galactico had amassed an impressive $800m (£587m) by the time he retired 12 years ago. At one point, he was the world’s highest-paid footballer, and his five-year contract with LA Galaxy in 2008 would be worth around £190m today.

Beckham has also expanded his personal wealth through partnerships with well-known brands like Emporio Armani, Gillette, PepsiCo, H&amp, M, Breitling, and most recently Adidas, as well as a number of lucrative sponsorships and business deals. He’s even created a line of fragrances and credited his name to everything from video games to sunglasses.

The Netflix documentary is believed to have netted the ex-footballer a whopping £20m, while he raked in a staggering £72.6m in 2023 thanks to his sponsorships and production company. He also signed a 10-year deal to become an ambassador for Qatar, which reportedly saw him paid around £125m by the country.

Beckham is known for his lavish spending, with over a dozen properties making up his impressive portfolio, which is thought to be worth around £70 million, in addition to earning astronomical sums from his various ventures. That includes a $ 17 million Miami penthouse and a $ 30 million townhouse in London.

He also has a 130-foot superyacht that reportedly cost him around £16 million, and his total car collection is thought to be worth more than £2 million.

Continue reading the article.

Join our new MAN UTD WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Manchester United content from Mirror Football. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Premier League and EFL packages are discounted by Sky Sports.

We may link to affiliate links in this article, but we will make money off of any purchases we make. more information
Content Image

£43

£35

Get the deal here.

Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle ahead of the 2025/26 season, saving members £192 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

Norris ‘not doing very good job’ as Piastri fastest

Getty Images
  • 226 Comments

Singapore Grand Prix

Listen on Sounds
Full coverage guide

McLaren’s Lando Norris said he had a “bad day” in Friday practice at the Singapore Grand Prix after setting fifth fastest time following a collision in the pit lane.

The Briton was 0.483 seconds slower than the pace-setter, his team-mate and title rival Oscar Piastri, who leads Norris by 25 points in the championship.

Norris, who won Singapore from pole position last year, said: “A difficult day for me. Not feeling too great with the car, missing all the feelings I had here last year, plenty of things to work on. Just a bad day.

“Oscar’s quick so I have nothing to complain about, just not doing a very good job.”

Norris sounded unhappy with his performance over the radio in the car before speaking to media.

In a conversation with engineer Will Joseph in discussing run strategy, Norris said his lack of pace was down to “my driving”.

Before setting his fastest lap, Norris was hit by Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc in the pit lane in an incident which broke the McLaren’s front wing.

The damaged Mercedes of George Russell, minus a front wing, after he crashed during second practice for the Singapore Grand PrixGetty Images

Norris shrugged the incident off, saying it “cost the team a bit of money, which is a shame”. Leclerc and Ferrari have been called to the stewards and are likely to be fined for an unsafe release.

Racing Bulls’ Isack Hadjar was second fastest in a session interrupted by two red flags for crashes, ahead of Red Bull’s Max Verstappen and Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso.

The two incidents that led to red flags were crashes by Mercedes’ George Russell and Racing Bulls’ Liam Lawson.

Russell lost control on the entry to Turn 16, and nosed into the barriers, breaking his front wing. He missed the rest of the session because the car required a full system reset.

Lawson crashed on the exit of the same chicane, clouting the wall out of Turn 17, breaking his right-side wheels and coming to rest in the pit lane entry.

Piastri looked and sounded confident as he returned to the track after his incident-strewn weekend in Baku, in which he crashed in practice and qualifying, jumped the start and then crashed on the first lap of the race.

He was making jokes about the Ferrari drivers getting in his way in the first session, saying: “I’m sure Ferrari will invent mirrors some day.”

And at the end of the second session he made a tongue-in-cheek remark about the driver cooling vest causing difficulties in the cockpit.

Red Bull, who have struggled in Singapore for the past couple of seasons, felt they had had a positive day.

Verstappen, the winner of the past two races at Monza and Baku, said: “The car was not too bad, a bit like the last two weekends. There were no major problems.

“Tried a few things, some were good and we just need to try and optimise that a bit more. In general quite satisfied, but definitely need a bit more pace to fight up at the front tomorrow.”

The disrupted session meant drivers did not have time to do their race-simulation runs at the end, so a clear indication of form did not emerge.

Alonso was quick all day in the Aston Martin on a track where the car’s weaknesses are not exposed and where he has always been strong.

But the team would be expected to slip down the field on Saturday.

Alonso said: “Seems little bit better than the previous grands prix. Let’s try to fine-tune the set-up. It’s still not in a happy place, especially on the front axle. Still a little bit too much understeer. Something to work tonight but a good start.

“Since the first lap we were in a comfy place and were able to find the limits quite quickly.

“Let’s see if we can be in Q3 tomorrow and points on Sunday. Both sessions in the top four is probably the best Friday so far but sometimes Friday we run with a different programme or different fuel, and the real test is tomorrow.”

His team-mate Lance Stroll was sixth fastest, 0.345secs off the Spaniard, followed by Haas driver Esteban Ocon, Williams’ Carlos Sainz and the Ferraris of Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton.

Related topics

  • Formula 1

Norris ‘not doing very good job’ as Piastri fastest

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 226 Comments

Grand Prix of Singapore

Listen on Sounds
Full coverage instructions

McLaren’s Lando Norris said he had a “bad day” in Friday practice at the Grand Prix of Singapore after setting fifth fastest time following a collision in the pit lane.

The Briton, who leads Norris by 25 points in the championship standings, was 0.483 seconds behind his team-mate and title rival Oscar Piastri, who was the pace-setter.

A difficult day for me, according to Norris, who won Singapore last year from pole position. I’m not feeling particularly well with the car; I’m also missing the emotions I had last year. There are plenty of things to work on. Just a bad day, really.

Oscar does a good job, but I have nothing to complain about because he is “so quick.”

Before speaking to the media, Norris reportedly complained about how poorly he handled the car radio.

When asked about running strategy, Norris claimed that his lack of pace was brought on by “my driving.”

In a collision that caused the McLaren’s front wing to break before Norris’ fastest lap, Charles Leclerc hit him in the pit lane.

The damaged Mercedes of George Russell, minus a front wing, after he crashed during second practice for the Grand Prix of SingaporeImages courtesy of Getty

Norris blasted the incident, saying it “cost the team a little money, which is unfortunate.” Ferrari and Leclerc have been informed to the stewards, and their release is likely to result in fines.

Isack Hadjar from Racing Bulls was second fastest, ahead of Max Verstappen from Red Bull and Fernando Alonso from Aston Martin, in a session that was interrupted by two red flag crashes.

Mercedes’ George Russell and Racing Bulls’ Liam Lawson both crashed, which produced two red flags.

Russell slammed into the barriers before Turn 16 and lost control, breaking his front wing. Because the car required a complete system reset, he missed the remainder of the session.

Lawson crashed into the pit lane entry after leaving the same chicane and breaking the wall out of Turn 17.

After crashing in practice and qualifying, jumping the start, and then colliding on the first lap of the race, Piastri appeared and sounded confident as he made his return to the track.

In the first session, he joked that Ferrari would eventually create mirrors. “I’m sure Ferrari will invent mirrors one day.

And he made a tongue-in-cheek comment about the cockpit’s issues caused by the driver cooling vest at the end of the second session.

Red Bull felt happy after a difficult start to their recent run in Singapore.

Verstappen, the previous two-time champion at Monza and Baku, said: “The car was not bad, a little like the last two weekends. There were no significant issues.

We just need to try and optimize that a little bit more, he said. “Tried a few things, some were good.” Overall, quite satisfied, but we will need a little more tempo tomorrow to battle it out front.

A clear indication of form didn’t show up because of the disrupted session, which meant that drivers had no time to complete their race-simulation runs at the end.

Alonso was quick all day driving an Aston Martin on a track where he has always been strong and where his flaws are hidden.

On Saturday, the team would be expected to slack off the field.

Alonso praised the performance, which he described as “a little better than the previous grand prix.” Let’s try to adjust the configuration. Even on the front axle, especially, it’s still not in a happy place. Still a little understeering a little bit. A good start, but there is still work tonight.

We were comfortable on the first lap and were able to locate the limits fairly quickly.

“Let’s see if we can win the Q3 on Sunday.” The best Friday so far, with both sessions in the top four, is probably tomorrow, but we occasionally use a different program or fuel on Friday.

His team-mate Lance Stroll was sixth fastest, 0.3445 seconds off the Spaniard, followed by Esteban Ocon, Carlos Sainz, Williams, and Lewis Hamilton’s Ferrari.

related subjects

  • Formula 1

Horner ‘ringing up pretty much every team owner’

Media PA

Christian Horner, the former Red Bull team’s manager, is “ringing up pretty much every team owner,” according to Aston Martin’s CEO Andy Cowell.

One of the teams linked to Horner is Aston Martin.

Cowell stated that he and the team’s owner Lawrence Stroll had checked the situation at the Grand Prix of Singapore on Friday.

Cowell noted that “Christian seems to be ringing up pretty much every team owner right now.”

Horner “approached” the US-based team, according to Haas team principal Ayao Komatsu, adding that “nothing has gone any further.” It is finished.

Alpine managing director Steve Nielsen claimed that Horner and the French team’s executive adviser and de facto boss Flavio Briatore were “old friends.”

Nielsen continued, “I don’t know what they talk about. Although I am aware that there are no plans for Christian to visit Alpine, it won’t change that.

James Vowles, the Williams team’s principal, claimed Horner had not approached them.

Vowles remarked, “We’re very pleased with the structure we have, and it’s working.” There is no reason to change that, I believe.

In August, Horner’s relationship with the Cadillac team’s boss, who is preparing for Formula One, was ruled out. There haven’t been any discussions with Christian Horner, according to Chief Executive Officer Dan Towriss.

After agreeing a severance package with Red Bull on September 22nd, Horner will be free to return to F1 by the middle of next year.

Following the British Grand Prix in July, the 51-year-old was fired as the team’s principal.

Grand Prix of Singapore

Listen on Sounds
Full coverage instructions

related subjects

  • Formula 1

Horner ‘ringing up pretty much every team owner’

PA Media

Former Red Bull team boss Christian Horner is “ringing up pretty much every team owner” as he seeks a route back into Formula 1, says Aston Martin chief executive officer Andy Cowell.

Aston Martin are among the teams that have been linked with Horner.

Cowell said he had checked the situation with team owner Lawrence Stroll on Friday at the Singapore Grand Prix.

“It looks as though Christian is ringing up pretty much every team owner at the moment,” said Cowell.

Haas team principal Ayao Komatsu said Horner had “approached” the US-based team but added: “Nothing has gone any further. It is finished.”

Alpine managing director Steve Nielsen said the French team’s executive adviser and de facto boss Flavio Briatore was “old friends” with Horner.

Nielsen added: “I don’t know what they talk about. Everything I know is there are no plans for Christian to come to Alpine but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen.”

Williams team principal James Vowles said Horner had not approached them.

“We’re very happy with the structure we have and it’s working,” Vowles said. “I don’t see any reason to change from that.”

The boss of the Cadillac team that is entering F1 ruled out any connection with Horner in August. Chief executive officer Dan Towriss said: “There have been no talks with Christian Horner and there are no plans to do that.”

Horner is free to return to F1 by the middle of next year after finalising a severance package with Red Bull on 22 September.

The 51-year-old was fired as Red Bull team principal after the British Grand Prix in July.

Singapore Grand Prix

Listen on Sounds
Full coverage guide

Related topics

  • Formula 1

Nepal’s leaderless Gen-Z revolution has changed the rules of power

One question persisted in the nation during the 48 hours that Nepal’s Gen-Z revolution took place: “Where is their Lenin?” However, perhaps the purpose of that question was missed. Every Nepali revolution has been undone by those who claimed to be in charge of it for decades, not by its enemies. The movement’s greatest strength was not the lack of a single figurehead at this time; it was rather its greatest strength.

One name, Sudan Gurung, the head of the youth-led organization Hami Nepal, started to appear after the protests. Gurung, however, did not take the lead in the uprising; he only emerged after the event was over acting more as a spokesperson than as a commander. His precarious standing served as evidence of how this revolt differed. Nepal’s young protesters resisted giving anoint to a leader, breaking with a pre-existing system where the majority of power was largely concentrated in the hands of the elite. They demonstrated that charismatic behavior could lead to change in the individual rather than the group.

The enormous human cost of regaining power was also revealed by the same revolution that reimagined leadership. It was among Nepal’s worst 48 hours in the country, both in terms of human life and economics. In the clashes, at least 74 people were killed and roughly 2, 113 were hurt. The Parliament Building, the Supreme Court, and the Singha Durbar, three of democracy’s three pillars, were torched. At least 300 local government offices were hacked, and the violence did not just stop in the capital. The media, Nepal’s largest private outlet, the Kantipur Media House, was the target of fire, as well as the fourth pillar of democracy, the media. According to preliminary government estimates, Nepal’s public infrastructure has lost close to one trillion rupees, nearly half of Nepal’s annual gross domestic product, accounting for the economic damage of up to three trillion rupees (roughly $21 billion).

The state apparatus was completely destroyed by September 10. The army was the only institution keeping things order, parliament was inruins, and the prime minister had resigned. The decentralized nature of the revolution expanded even more in this political vacuum. The “Youths Against Corruption” Discord channel was used as an impromptu public square by protest organizers to make their decision. Thousands of people debating during the so-called “Discord Election.” A “marathon session” more appropriate for a Twitch stream was described as “a struggle for moderators to manage a slew of opinions from users with unidentified anime avatars and handles.” Over 7,500 people cast their ballots on the platform, ultimately choosing Sushila Karki as their interim prime minister.

However, it would be unfair to history to simply interpret these events as the defining factor for this revolution. The uprising was a response, not a plan. Simply put, we were protesting in high schools and universities. The initial stage of the massacre of 19 protesters, some of whom were still wearing uniforms, turned into racial unrest. The targets were unavoidably those of a state that would murder its own citizens.

The physical chaos has dissipated right now. Nepalis are now regaining hope thanks to a new interim government with technocratic ministers. But there is a problem: Will we abandon the practice of limiting leadership to leaders, or will we adopt a new standard for them? The Nepalese people held the notion that the public was in charge for 48 hours. The general public discovered this truth through chaos, not just a belief.

The challenge for Nepalis, Gen-Z and beyond, is to never forget the lessons of this revolution. We must also inquire as to how and why it happened, but history will not forget what took place on September 8 and 9.

Nepal’s political history must be understood as a continuous pattern rather than a collection of episodic events. The uprising of 2025 was the most recent example of a long line of betrayal and revolt. Not as ideology as as a framework, but as a Marxist analytical lens can be helpful. The terms “base” and “superstructure” can be used in political terms as well. The “political base” is understood as Nepal’s firmly established system of power, a network of patronage, corruption, and governance that maintains the status quo. The “political superstructure” is the opposition’s “decentralized public,” sometimes an organized party, or another force. This framework exposes a tragic cycle: each succeeding superstructure in Nepal simply becomes the new base.

Consider the first revolution of the century in Nepal in 1951. From this perspective, the Rana regime’s old autocratic foundation was being viewed as the political superstructure. The revolution’s heroes included actors like B.P. Koirala, King Tribhuvan, and the five martyrs, but one cannot deny the roles that the exiled parties, the aspirant bourgeoisie, and a restored monarchy played. Koirala, who became Nepal’s first democratically elected prime minister, was a face of those hopes.

However, those dreams never materialized. Almost ten years later, King Mahendra dissolved parliament, abolished the parties, and established the Panchayat system, granting the monarchy itself the power to exercise its power. Although some claim that this time period was a golden age, protests there in 1980 and, in the end, the People’s Movement I, Nepal’s second great revolution, are what resulted.

The same pattern was followed by that revolution. It brought back multi-party democracy and once more altered the political landscape. The underlying structures of patronage and feudalism were not dismantled by the democratic elite, which was made up of the same parties that had fought the Panchayat. They instead established a new political elite, perfecting a kleptocratic system that would entail a bloody civil war. Another dark chapter was opened by the Maoist insurgency, which had been brewing for years before its initial attack.

The Maoist movement, which culminated in People’s Movement II, seems to perfectly fit this Marxist lens, given its roots in communist theory. However, it too repeated Nepal’s tragic cycle despite its ideological undertones. The political base was simply replaced by the Maoist elites, who were the only ones who did so. Commanders assumed the same corrupt structures they once criticized as ministers. They ignored the economic contradictions at the heart of their revolution and continued to perpetuate the same kleptocracy through the old patronage networks. The structures remained the same despite the slogan changes.

In retrospect, their leadership may be the decisive factor in all these revolutions. Leaders on all political parties turned into opportunists, supporting a kleptocratic regime hailed as democracy-declared and referred to as “People’s Movements.” The people’s expectations were never fulfilled. In this context, Nepal’s recent Gen-Z revolution’s lack of leadership was not its greatest strategic advantage but rather its greatest weakness.

This historical pattern demonstrates that the Gen-Z revolution of 2025 was not the result of a quick burst but rather the detonation of a bomb that had been developing for decades. The only thing that caught the attention was the social media ban. Each “failed” revolution added pressure on a politically divided Nepali electorate who had long believed in the need for uprising.

Nepal’s revolutionary youth is now faced with the daunting task of breaking the vicious cycle of betrayal perpetrated by the government itself. Change of who has power is no longer the goal, but rather how it is defined. We must never confide in any self-declared savior for the sake of mankind. Our only hope is ourselves, as taught in September. We have always been the same as ourselves, not the king, the prime minister, the president, or the mayor. Another leader cannot allow the people’s agency to be hijacked. Nepal’s civic DNA needs to include accountability in order to maintain a vigilant, organized, and alert citizenry. September 8 and 9 will never be forgotten and will never be the same. With the people, the power must continue to exist where it was first discovered.