Israel has received the latest captive’s body from Hamas in Gaza as part of the ceasefire deal signed four weeks ago. Five more captives’ bodies are believed to remain buried under rubble.
Hamas returns latest captive body to Israel


Israel has received the latest captive’s body from Hamas in Gaza as part of the ceasefire deal signed four weeks ago. Five more captives’ bodies are believed to remain buried under rubble.

Lagos, Nigeria — When Lawrence Zhongo and his wife got married in 2023, relatives and friends from across their region in central Nigeria attended the ceremony. But in the years since, he has been left distraught time and again with each new report of a deadly attack that has claimed the lives of people who celebrated with the couple.
“I can’t count the number of relatives and friends I have lost. My wife lost eight relatives in the Ziki attack in April,” Zhongo, a yam and maize farmer in Miango village in Plateau State, told Al Jazeera. “These are people that came for my wedding.”
list of 3 itemsend of list
In that attack, armed men stormed into homes in Zike village in the Bassa local government area, in overnight raids that reports said killed more than 50 people, including children. Days earlier, 40 people were reportedly killed in a similar attack in the Bokkos local government area.
For decades, Nigeria’s middle belt or central region has been the site of deadly communal violence between usually Muslim Fulani pastoral herders and the majority Christian farmers of various ethnicities, whom experts say are clashing over competition for resources.
At the same time, in northern Nigeria, Boko Haram and other ISIL (ISIS)-affiliated armed groups have launched deadly attacks for more than a decade, killing thousands and forcing hundreds of thousands to be displaced, as the groups attempt to impose harsh interpretations of Islamic law in the country’s mainly Muslim north.
Though the victims of violence are from different cultures and religions, the attacks have led to United States President Donald Trump threatening to invade Nigeria “guns-a-blazing” over what right-wing lawmakers in the US allege is a “Christian genocide“.
“I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action,” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform last Saturday. “If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians!”
He said if Nigeria continues to allow the killings of Christians, the US would cease all aid and assistance to the country and would use military action to “wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities”.
Subsequently, the US Department of State on Monday designated Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). The list, featuring countries such as China, India, and Russia, includes states engaged in severe violations of religious freedom. Nigeria is no stranger to it, as it was a CPC during Trump’s first term, a designation that was reversed under President Joe Biden.
This week’s move comes after months of effort by US Senator Ted Cruz, who has been trying to rally fellow evangelical Christians to buy into the agenda, saying in October that Nigeria’s government is enabling a “massacre” against Christians.
Abuja, however, has vocally refuted the US claims, and so have many Nigerians.
“The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians,” said Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, in response to the US claims.
At the same time, in the north-central region, which is the epicentre of the communal violence, even the victims who are angry at the government do not want US intervention.
Zhongo, the farmer, says he is traumatised by the loss of his friends and relatives in attacks that have escalated in recent years.
“We have a failed [security] system, and we blame the government,” the 39-year-old said, adding that he has more or less given up on the authorities’ ability or willingness to stop the communal attacks and those carried out by armed groups.
At least 1,207 people have been killed in Miango since 2001, according to local figures, with hundreds of people injured.
Due to the violence, Miango’s residents have not been able to go to their farms, where armed men continue to attack and kill people. Zhongo said some families in the village are starving as a result.
Yet, Zhongo, who is Christian, does not see the crisis as merely a one-sided war in which only people of one religion are targeted.
“I will never deny that Muslims are also killed in the attacks. There are Muslims and other Fulanis who have been affected. I remembered when they killed some Fulani leaders,” Zhongo said.
Ali Tiga is a former Muslim who converted to Christianity.
He says he still cannot forget the day last year when he received a call saying his sister-in-law had been killed. He was attending a wedding ceremony in another town and had to rush back home.
“My brother’s pregnant wife was killed, her stomach dissected and the foetus removed,” the secondary school civic education teacher told Al Jazeera. “I have lost three friends and five relatives in the last three years, some of them were killed in their farms and homes.”
Tiga also acknowledges that there has been death and tragedy on all sides.
Fulani herder Aliyu, who gave Al Jazeera only his first name for security reasons, is one of the numerous Muslims who have suffered as a result of the escalating attacks.
He said attackers often lie in ambush in the grazing areas, and when herders enter the area, they open fire on them and their cattle, resulting in the loss of cows and sometimes human lives.
“I have lost my brothers to these attacks, I have lost cows too,” he said.
But loss of life is not the only loss Aliyu faces. He has lost friendships, he laments.
The relationships between his tribe and the Christian tribes have become polarised, he says.
“One thing that saddens me is that when we were growing up, we grew up together – Christians and Muslims attended the same schools and we celebrated Christmas and Sallah together. As a Muslim now, there are some Christian communities where I can’t step my foot.”

Nigeria is a secular country of 220 million people where the population is nearly evenly divided between Christians, who make up 45 percent, and Muslims, who constitute about 53 percent. It comprises more than 250 ethnic groups, and the middle belt region reflects this ethnic diversity the most.
Trump’s call for intervention has roused continuing conversation in Nigeria about the insecurity and loss of lives across all regions, as well as the government’s seeming complacency in reining in the activities of armed actors.
As part of the government’s plan to ease farmer-herder tensions, national authorities launched a ten-year National Livestock Transformation Plan in 2019 to stop herders and their cattle encroaching on farms and to modernise the livestock sectors by adopting cattle ranching. Some state governments also introduced anti-grazing laws. But experts have noted that implementation of the plan faced significant challenges, such as inadequate political leadership, delays, funding uncertainties and a lack of expertise. In tackling the violence, Nigeria’s military has also launched operations to flush out attackers – but these have been criticised for ineffectiveness and apparent bias.
Armed groups have plagued Nigeria since 2009, but the crisis in the north came into international prominence after Boko Haram, a group known for its anti-Western education ideologies, kidnapped 276 girls from a boarding school in Chibok in 2014, triggering global outrage.
For the past decade, the crisis in the mainly Muslim north has escalated, with groups including the ISIL affiliate in West Africa Province (ISWAP), Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad (JAS), Lakurawa, and marauding bandits gaining ground. Meanwhile, other regions of Nigeria have also seen violent attacks increase.
Yet the farmer-herder violence in the middle belt is arguably Nigeria’s most vicious security threat, said to be six times deadlier than Boko Haram’s armed rebellion, according to the think tank, Crisis Group.
It has displaced entire communities, caused loss of lives and properties, and directly contributed to Nigeria’s food shortages emergency because farmers are unable to access their farms. Since 2020, more than 1,300 people have been killed as a result of the violence, according to a 2024 report by Lagos-based sociopolitical risk advisory firm SBM Intelligence.
Experts say what Trump interprets as the mass killing of Christians is in fact a multilayered crisis that affects many groups.
“There is no such thing as a Christian genocide in Nigeria, but that does not mean there are no Christians killed or those targeted because of their faith,” said Malik Samuel, a senior researcher at advocacy nonprofit, Good Governance Africa, who added that armed groups like ISWAP, for example, do target Christians.

Amaka Anku, the head of Africa practice at political risk consultancy, Eurasia Group, said similar attacks occur in the northwest, where the attackers, bandits, and the farmers happen to be predominantly Muslims.
“What is true about all of [the attacks] is that the Nigerian government is not effective in protecting lives, has not been effective in arresting and prosecuting these criminal perpetrators. But that is the case for both Muslims and Christians,” she said.
Experts say it is easy to paint the issue with the brush of religion, as many armed militias are largely Muslim and attack Christian-dominated communities.
However, in the fertile middle belt region where herders and farmers have longstanding tensions over resources, analysts say the root of the violence can be linked more to dwindling access to things like arable land and water because of climate change and population growth.
Nevertheless, a lax security response, porous borders, and the inability of the authorities to bring perpetrators to justice in the face of a worsening crisis have led to accusations of collusion and the loss of faith in state institutions, analysts said.
“When the government fails to protect people who have been attacked several times over the years, of course they will accuse the government and security forces of collusion,” said researcher Samuel. “The lack of political will is what has made insecurity drag [on] for this long. The first responsibility of the government is [the] protection of lives and properties.”
Trump’s call for US intervention has not brought enthusiasm among those who are directly affected. Instead, Nigerians are worried it might exacerbate the situation, especially in a complex crisis where perpetrators live close to the community.
“We hope that Tinubu can come up with a strategy to use internal forces to fight the terrorists and not invite external forces; it is going to be a shameful thing,” said Zhongo.
In the capital, Abuja, Nigerians are also concerned about how Trump’s threats might affect the country.
Funmilayo Obasa, 25, closely watches the news, fearing US military action would worsen the humanitarian and displacement crises in Nigeria’s north, where hundreds of thousands of people are presently displaced.
“They might end up killing more people than the terrorists have, and that will definitely worsen the situation,” she said.
Abuja said on Monday that it would welcome US military assistance as long as it recognises Nigeria’s territorial sovereignty.
“Nigeria and the US military already have cooperation, and you could see a situation where they work in conjunction with the Nigerian military,” risk analyst Anku explained, but US military action would not work with bandits and herders who are civilians and live close by or even within the communities that are being affected by violence.
The best solution is a local one, according to Anku, who said Abuja needs to do a better job of prosecuting perpetrators of violence – no matter who they are – which is tied to better intelligence gathering and efficient policing.
Nigeria also needs to strengthen its community conflict monitoring, said Olajumoke Ayandele, an assistant professor at New York University’s Center for Global Affairs and an advisory board member at the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) Project.
“The way to do this is supporting community-based early warning mechanisms that empower local actors so that they’re able to detect and are able to address these tensions before they escalate,” she said.
Scaling up interfaith mediation and community mediation programmes, which are at present in place in small pockets in parts of the northeastern states of Yobe and Gombe, will also help, she added.
“It will be very effective when we’re thinking about post-conflict reconciliation processes, so that we can know that a lot of these issues that we are trying to tackle are being addressed without exacerbating the grievances that even cause them.”
Military deployment, Ayandele said, has to be paired with human rights safeguards, so that immediate threats are addressed without deepening existing tensions or alienating the communities that need protection.
To effectively deal with the security threats, researcher Samuel said the governance issues leading to problems such as unemployment, lack of basic infrastructure, and poverty must be resolved first.
“You can deploy all the security forces in the world; they can crush these guys, but tomorrow another group would come up unless you address the drivers of insecurity,” he said.
Meanwhile, back in Miango, Zhongo is still reeling from all the loss he and his family have faced. He is fed up with the killings and hopeful for a Nigerian government-led intervention that will not deepen existing crises.
“The Nigerian government is enough if they are willing to fight these terrorists,” he said.

Amid the disappointment and recrimination that comes with losing the first Rugby League Ashes series for 22 years with a game to spare, England’s players still feel they’re not that far away from the world champions.
That belief has some basis. England have arguably been the better team in the first half of both Tests so far and will look to missed chances and some marginal refereeing calls as Sliding Doors moments.
But when Australia have gone through the gears at the start of the second half in both games – inspired by Reece Walsh at Wembley, and with a quickfire try double in Liverpool – England have had no response. The Kangaroos won 26-6 in London, and 14-4 on Merseyside.
Which begs the question as to where this leaves England as they look ahead to the World Cup, primarily to be held in Australia, 12 months from now.
England coach Shaun Wane feels a lack of opportunities to play international games have held his side back.
He points to the crowded English domestic schedule. Super League teams played three more regular league matches than National Rugby League sides in 2025, with Challenge Cup commitments to add to that.
It left no room for the usual mid-season international match, and there is currently not one planned for 2026. It raises the possibility of Saturday’s final Ashes Test at Headingley being England’s final match before their World Cup opener down under.
Rugby League Ashes
25 October, 1 November, 8 November

Critics of Wane and England will compare the current generation to the team who reached the 2017 World Cup final against Australia. That agonising 6-0 defeat is the closest the English have come to winning the tournament as a solo nation.
But Kallum Watkins, the only player to feature both in that final and the current squad, insists England have not gone backwards.
“I don’t think so – we have been really close,” he told BBC Sport when asked whether the gap has grown in the past eight years.
“We have a good core group of players; it is about giving them the experience of playing in these games. This Test series has been a platform for that, building up to the World Cup.
“It’s the small details. We can match them physically, we showed that last week, and we have made chances – we just have to execute them.”
St Helens prop Matty Lees, meanwhile, points to domestic results and England’s showings in clean-sweep series wins over Tonga and Samoa since the last World Cup in 2022.
“At club level, we beat Penrith in the World Club Challenge [in 2023] – it is closer than they think,” he said.

So, if England are a match for Australia, why have they only scored one try in two matches and lost the past two games by an aggregate score of 40-10?
Lees points to poor tactical decisions in the opening Test which left England outnumbered in midfield and unable to line break, resulting in their best attacks coming from hopeful kicks while Australia ran the match with ball in hand.
England were more effective with their kicking at Hill Dickinson Stadium and matched Australia much better physically. Ultimately, both games were decided by individual Australian brilliance – Walsh at Wembley, Nathan Cleary at Everton.
“That first Test didn’t lack effort, but lacked clarity in our roles,” said Lees. “We fixed that in the second match. We were a lot happier and that showed. We were in there competing. Hopefully we can build on that.”
“There were a few little switch-offs in Liverpool, a 10-minute spell when we weren’t at it and top teams punish you,” added team-mate Jez Litten. “For long spells we dominated, need the points to show for it.
“It feels like they have been more clinical. We have dominated large parts. Last week was a proper Test match and hopefully we get that again this week.”
Tactical concerns inevitably lead to the coach’s door. If it was up to the commenters below the line on BBC Sport’s articles about this series, Wane would already be out on his ear.
His focus on defence and grinding teams down has been criticised, as have been some selections. The return of players in their thirties, such as Watkins and Joe Burgess – several years after their previous England caps – has been used to suggest that either Wane is guilty of regressive thinking or that he lacks quality options.
But speaking to players this week, there was unanimous support for the boss.
“I love Shaun Wane – he is passionate about his country, and I can relate to that,” said Litten. “To come into camp and represent who we are as a nation is unreal. The way he gets the boys motivated is unreal, so hopefully we can finish on a high.
“If you look at someone who would do anything for his country, that is someone I want to play under. I’m proud to be part of this team.”
While on paper the final Test is a dead rubber, it could still serve as a crucial bellwether for next October – especially if it is the last time England play before then.
Australia have picked a strong team, with the return of captain Isaah Yeo the only change from last week. Another loss will only ratchet up the pressure on Wane.

Kerry Katona has shared her devastation for David and Victoria Beckham after the football star’s knighthood was snubbed by a family member. Sir David and Lady Victoria’s heartbreaking, months-long feud with their son Brooklyn has been apparent for months.
The couple’s eldest son Brooklyn, 26, has failed to show up for – or even publicly acknowledge – all of the big milestone events and celebrations the Beckham clan have enjoyed this year including David’s 50th birthday celebrations and Victoria’s Netflix documentary release. In the latest heartbreaking turn of events, Brooklyn was a no-show when his dad was knighted by King Charles III at Windsor Castle this week.
The rest of the family – including Victoria, Cruz, Romeo, Harper and David’s parents David and Sandra – all showed up in a full force to witness the momentous occasion. Not only were Brooklyn and wife Nicola Peltz not present, but they failed to make any mention of David’s huge achievement on social media – despite it being the biggest story of the day, so it was very hard to miss.
Now, celebrity mum Kerry Katona, who has children Molly, Lilly-Sue, Maxwell, Dylan-Jorge and Heidi, has shared her heartache for the couple, and especially Victoria as a mother.
Writing in her exclusive column with new! magazine, Kerry said: “It was about time that David Beckham got his knighthood. But Brooklyn wasn’t at the ceremony. If that was one of my children, I’d be devastated.
“That moment is something Brooklyn’s never going to get back. Your parents aren’t here forever. I’ve had the most rocky relationship with my mum but I’ll pop in and see her [once] every blue moon – I’ve not abandoned her.
“I’ve met David and Victoria, actually. Victoria sent me some flowers when Brian McFadden left and I met David at a Spice Girls concert. They were lovely. Victoria’s one of the nicest celebrities that I’ve met.”
It comes as Brooklyn broke his cover days after his dad’s investiture ceremony at Windsor Palace, where he was awarded his knighthood.
Revealing what he got up to instead of celebrating with his family, in a post shared on the Instagram page for his hot sauce company Cloud 23, Brooklyn was seen wearing a grey hoodie with black jeans and a black cap as he strolled through the streets of New York.
Set to the music of Best Of My Love by The Emotions, the video saw Brooklyn pull two bottles of hot sauce out of his back pocket. Over the top of the video, it read: “The vibe Brooklyn brings to the function.”
Fans jumped in the comments of the post to criticise Brooklyn for failing to congratulate David on his achievement. One wrote: “Your dad just got a knighthood, he sure brought the vibes!” Another simply said: “Congratulate your dad.” A third said: “But couldn’t be a**** to turn up at his dad’s knighthood.”
Rumours of a rift between Brooklyn and his family started earlier this year. He and Nicola have not been seen with his parents since Christmas last year and stopped interacting with them on social media. Brooklyn and his brothers also no longer follow each other.
The speculation intensified when Brooklyn and Nicola had a vow renewal and only had her family present. Some have suggested that the feud began after Nicola refused to wear a wedding dress designed by Victoria at her 2022 wedding.
According to sources, it continues, despite Victoria and David’s attempts at olive branches, because Nicola does not want to make peace. “Nicola’s not ready to make nice,” the source revealed.

Peter Andre has candidly admitted to feeling scared as he and his wife Emily were met with a huge parenting first for them both.
The singer, 52, is a proud dad to Junior, 20, Princess, 18, Amelia, 11, Theo, eight, and Arabella, one. Pete, his wife Emily, 36, and the children recently jetted off on a family trip to Cyprus. But as Pete and Emily shared photos of their sweet trip, some fans noticed one member of their family was missing; daughter Amelia.
Now, in his exclusive column with new! magazine, Peter has revealed what Amelia was up to while the rest of the family were on holiday.
He revealed: “Some people noticed that our daughter Amelia wasn’t there on this trip and that’s because she was doing something incredible. She was on a pilgrimage with Emily’s mum – so with her grandma – and they did the Pyrenees, which was absolutely amazing. She walked about 80 km in four days, she said it was the most incredible experience.
“So it’s the first time she hasn’t come away with us but she was with her grandma doing a pilgrimage which I thought was wonderful so go on Mills – what a wonderful experience that she had!”
Pete then revealed he had mixed emotions as while he felt proud of her, letting her go on the trek was, understandably, scary for him.
“It was very scary for us, you know, it’s very scary as a parent – obviously we knew that she’s with Emily’s mum, who is a paediatrician, she’s a doctor so having a doctor on hand is always great, but it is always scary and because she wasn’t with us for the first… it was just really, really, really, scary, but it was wonderful to know that she was achieving so much, we’re very proud.”
It comes after Peter set a strict rule with his wife Emily over their youngest children after his daughter Princess’ career success.
Peter has been supportive of Princess and Junior, who he shares with ex wife Katie Price, at glitzy events as they embark on their own careers. Meanwhile Princess has come into her own this year with her reality TV show, The Princess Diaries, and her makeup brand, which she is currently building. Princess’ brother Junior has enjoyed success in his own right as he’s been busy working on his music and social media, though he recently revealed he would be taking a break from the former.
But, Peter and Emily have decided on a different set of rules for their younger children. While Princess and Junior had already been on red carpets, Loose Women and charity balls throughout their childhood, the same won’t happen to Amelia, Theo and Arabella. When asked if they would bring their youngest to the Pride of Britain, Emily told us: “We have talked about that!”
Peter added: “Amelia asked today. She said, ‘will I be able to come with you?’ I said, maybe when you are 16.” Emily agreed as she explained: “She’s at secondary school now, I think maybe when she’s 16.”
Despite the pair laying down new ground rules for their young kids, Peter and Emily are both proud of what Princess and Junior have achieved already.

With an awkward royal diary clash and the announcement of Meghan Markle ’s Hollywood comeback, the rift between the Sussexes and the royal family could not have looked more glaring. Last week Prince Harry risked overshadowing his brother by embarking on his own high-profile foreign trip, just as Prince William was visiting Brazil for his much-anticipated Earthshot Prize and to represent the King at the COP30 climate change summit.
The timing could hardly have been worse, with photos of the Duke of Sussex posing with soldiers in Canada emerging as William was giving his keynote speech at the eco conference. As if that wasn’t enough, Harry’s wife Meghan then stole headlines from both of them, after it was announced that she’s to make her acting comeback with a role in a big-budget Hollywood movie.
READ MORE: Debenhams shoppers rave about ‘classy’ watch that’s slashed by £560
The former Suits actress, who quit acting when she became a member of the royal family, has landed a part in upcoming blockbuster Close Personal Friends, co-starring Emily In Paris actress Lily Collins and Marvel regular Brie Larson.
While movie insiders are said to have been “sworn to secrecy” over the specifics of her role, it’s been reported that Meghan will play herself and sees the part as a “massive moment” that could herald a full-time return to acting after an eight-year hiatus.
Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams claims the week’s events not only show that the feud between the Sussexes and royals is “alive and well”, but also points to a growing divide between Harry and Meghan, with her focus on a Hollywood comeback further proof that a return to the UK isn’t on the cards any time soon.
“Meghan’s decision to appear as herself in a Hollywood comedy film definitely emphasises her shift towards the US,” he tells us. “But Harry still feels very deeply about his homeland and would like to spend more time in the UK. The same cannot be said for Meghan, so there’s a clear divergence in opinions there.
“We also don’t know what will come after this film, but we do know they have Netflix projects to deliver, so this may only be the start for her in Hollywood.”
Last week Harry, who flew to Canada shortly after announcing the trip to mark “the period of Remembrancetide”, which traditionally runs from 1 to 11 November, wrote an essay titled The Bond, The Banter, The Bravery: What It Means To Be British. In it, he described the privilege he felt to have served alongside men and women from all four corners of the UK.
He went on to describe the “banter of the mess, the clubhouse, the pub, the stands” as the “things that make us British”, adding, “I love it.”
The letter, Richard says, is another clear indication of how deeply “self-exiled Harry misses the UK”, while Meghan is laser-focused on building her brand Stateside and will want to distance herself from the turmoil surrounding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew) as much as possible.
“Harry would very much like to see more of his father, especially as he has said publicly he doesn’t know how long he will live for,” says Richard. “It’s also Charles’s birthday very soon, and that will no doubt trigger more feelings of regret for Harry.
“But Meghan is focused on her commercial success. Her brand is currently far enough removed that it shouldn’t be damaged and she will certainly want to keep it that way. The levels of toxicity are such that there is certainly potential for damage to be done.”
Meghan was spotted on the set of the new film last week, with a source telling the US magazine People, “She seemed very relaxed and happy. She introduced herself to everyone and was very sweet and down to earth.”
Last week, Prince Harry’s team strongly dismissed any suggestion of an intentional clash between him and his older brother. They pointed out that the Toronto events were planned “nearly a year ago”, and the duke “can’t choose to move” the dates when Remembrancetide is marked.
But according to royal commentator Richard, the diary clash and inevitable talk of their estrangement have done little to repair frosty relations between the Sussexes and the rest of the family.
“It was outrageous for Earthshot to be overshadowed, first by Harry’s visit, and then by news of Meghan’s film,” he claims. “The feud appears to be alive and well and living, and that any relationship between William and Harry is unfortunately water under the bridge.
“Harry’s relationship with his father is another matter, but I suspect William is not on Harry’s list of priorities any more.”
As the King approaches his 77th birthday on 14 November and continues to be treated for cancer, he is also managing the shocking fallout from the revelations surrounding the relationship between his younger brother Andrew and the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Last month he announced he’d begun the formal process of stripping Andrew of his Prince and Duke of York titles as well as his right to live at Royal Lodge on the Windsor Estate. Richard says witnessing his father deal with the crisis will be especially hard for California-based Harry, who has only seen the King in person once in almost two years.
“Harry will feel deeply for his father,” he says. “It’s absolutely hellish for Charles at the moment – the situation is agonising – and of course Harry can see this. On a human level, it will be very difficult for him to witness.”