Mali’s Choguel Maiga charged with embezzlement, remanded in custody

As the West African nation’s military leaders intensify their crackdown on allegations of a coup plot, former prime minister Choguel Maiga has been detained and charged with embezzlement.

Following a hearing before Mali’s Supreme Court on Tuesday, the allegations against Maiga were made public.

Maiga, who became president in Mali in a second coup in 2021, was ousted in November 2024 after publicly criticizing the military for lack of clarity regarding the transition to a civilian government.

No trial date has been set for the former leader’s trial, according to Maiga’s attorney, Cheick Oumar Konare, according to Cheick Oumar Konare’s AFP news agency.

Konare remarked, “We are calm while the trial is pending,” adding that Maiga would continue to be imprisoned for the trial.

According to a statement from the public prosecutor, “money laundering amounts to many billions of CFA francs,” or several million US dollars, is being brought against Maiga.

The former prime minister was detained a week ago, the AFP reported. This was days after Mali’s military leaders made numerous arrests in an effort to discredit an alleged plot to overthrow the government.

Nine of Maiga’s former colleagues, all of whom were prime ministers, showed up in court on Tuesday, with two facing charges, some acquittal, and others awaiting trial, according to the AFP, citing a judicial source.

After tweeting his support for detained military critics earlier this month, another former prime minister, Moussa Mara, was sentenced to a prison.

Since 2012, Mali has experienced a security crisis, which is brought on by local criminal gangs, armed organizations affiliated with al-Qaeda, and the ISIL (ISIS) group. According to Human Rights Watch, there are currently 350, 000 people displaced while thousands of people have died as a result of the fighting.

In 2020, the military will be able to overthrow the country’s elected government in a coup due to the crisis.

A transitional government was briefly given to the military, but a second coup in 2021 took the place.

Assimi Goita, the colonel who took control of the two power grabs, swore in as the transitional leader the same year. The military has broken promises made to civilians by the end of March 2024 and has tightened its hold on power by dissolved all political parties, indicting dissidents, and placing prominent civil society figures in jail.

The military-appointed legislative body approved legislation in July that gave Goita a five-year presidential mandate that could be renewed without having to hold elections.

Maiga, who was one of the protesters who helped to end Mali’s civilian government in 2020, previously claimed he believed the military would protect democracy. No political power can ever again impose the conditions for a return to an unconstitutional order, so we must refound the Malian state! In a 2023 interview, he told Al Jazeera.

Maiga has become one of the military’s most vehement critics since his dismissal, though he claims that it has used the courts to silence dissention.

Maiga’s arrest and imprisonment on Tuesday, according to experts, shows how fragile the military system is.

According to Alioune Tine, the former UN rapporteur on Mali, “If the most prominent opposition leaders are arrested and imprisoned, including Choguel, who once gave the junta credibility, then I believe that today’s junta credibility is greatly diminished.”

You’re still in danger, just 30 kilometers [31 miles] from Bamako. The majority of the territory is under al-Qaeda’s affiliate JNIM. According to him, President Goita needs to change his mind about releasing journalists and activists and starting a national dialogue that will lead to legitimate democratic elections.

General Abdoulaye Maiga, who had previously served as the country’s military spokesman, has been replaced by Maiga by Mali’s military leaders.

A wave of coups in the Sahel region, south of the Sahara desert, are being sparked by the military’s use of force in Mali, including those against Burkinabe and Niger, which are fighting the same terrorist organizations as al-Qaeda and ISIL.

Peter Andre was ‘very strict’ about what his daughter Princess could include in her TV series

Peter Andre has opened up about his daughter’s family and shared information about The Princess Diaries, an ITV series that sees his daughter make her debut on television.

Prince Princess’ entry into the television industry has been discussed by Peter Andre.

Peter Andre insists he was “very strict” about his daughter Princess could feature in her new ITV reality show.

Speaking for the first time about the teenage’s foray into the TV world, Peter, 52, admitted he was wary of letting Princess appear on TV before she “got to an age where she could do it herself”. Yet now, her programme on ITV2, The Princess Diaries, has been praised since it began this summer.

In it, Princess, 18, opens up about her “chaotic” childhood as the daughter of the Mysterious Girl hitmaker, and his ex Katie Price. The young influencer told this week how Katie’s “Mucky Mansion” was a “really scary” place in which to live.

However, Peter has argued that he made sure his daughter was prepared to face the difficulties and trials that the showbiz industry brings. The father-of-five said, “I was very strict about what she wasn’t allowed to do, you know, I didn’t really want her to do a lot of things before she reached the age where she can do it herself.”

READ MORE: Patrick Kielty ‘to be in very dark place’ if new Cat Deeley fear unravelsREAD MORE: Katie Price’s ominous warning to new owners of Mucky Mansion after £1.5million sale

(Image: ITVX)
Continue reading the article.

After Peter and Katie split, Princess grew up in the “Mucky Mansion,” a sprawling pile in Sussex which Katie sold at the end of 2024, money for which she has reportedly used to pay off debt. Princess has spoken candidly about her experiences in the house, which she described as “really scary”.

And Peter, born in Harrow, northwest London, reflected on being a “strict” parent when Princess grew up. The star told Daily Mail: “I just wanted to be safe and, you know, you try and keep the innocence as long as you can with them, and then, you just got to realise that they’ve got to live life.

Peter
Peter shares two children with Katie Price; Princess and Junior Andre, pictured together in May(Image: Getty Images)
Continue reading the article.

I could have been a bit of a strict dad, but I don’t think I’m right now. I’m, I’m much more relaxed now… The difficult part is that, at age 18, some people let go [more easily] while trying to cut that umbilical cord, because I have to be honest.

The singer and songwriter praised Princess, describing her as “a really sweet person who will become” her own little true gem.

Australia hits back at Netanyahu amid escalating diplomatic row over Gaza

Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was called “weak,” and an Australian minister accused the Israeli leader of confusing strength with killing people.

Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke said that strength was not “measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry” in an interview with Australia’s national broadcaster on Wednesday.

Burke’s remarks come after Netanyahu blisteringly attacked Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on social media on Tuesday, claiming that he would be remembered as a “weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”

Burke characterized Netanyahu’s broadside as part of Israel’s “lashing out” against nations that have ratified the establishment of a Palestinian state during an interview on ABC’s Radio National Breakfast program.

When there is a decision that we know Israel won’t like, he directs it to Benjamin Netanyahu, according to Burke. “Strength is much better measured by exactly what Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has done,” he said.

He has the opportunity for person-to-person objections, and he has the conversation going, and he says exactly what we intend to do. And after they’ve been heard, announces them in a public manner before proceeding.

In recent months, tensions between Australia and Israel, who have traditionally been close allies, have become increasingly antagonistic, but ties have deteriorated since Canberra announced last week that it will grant a Palestinian state.

In response to concerns that a planned speaking tour in the nation was intended to “spread division,” Australia announced on Monday that it had cancelled a visa for Simcha Rothman, a lawmaker with Israel’s far-right Mafdal-Religious Zionism party and a member of Netanyahu’s ruling coalition.

Gideon Saar, the Israeli minister of foreign affairs, announced shortly after that statement that he had suspended Australian diplomats’ visas for the Palestinian Authority.

Israel is increasingly being pressured by international relations, including many of its traditional allies, over the magnitude of the suffering caused by its conflict in Gaza.

Trump says Smithsonian museums only cover ‘how bad Slavery was’ in US

As his administration examines the institution’s exhibits for their “Americanism,” President Donald Trump has claimed that only “horrible” topics, including “how bad Slavery was,” are discussed in the country’s Smithsonian museums.

Trump stated in a statement on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday that the Smithsonian is “OUT OF CONTROL” and that “everything that is said is how horrible our country is” and that “the downtrodden have been” were unaccomplished.

Trump went further in a review of a number of the Smithsonian’s 21 museums and galleries, saying he had instructed his attorneys to “go through the museums” and “to begin the same procedure that has been done with colleges and universities where tremendous progress has been made” after going over several of them last week.

Trump continued, “This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE.”

The White House’s “unprecedented” request to review the Smithsonian’s exhibits was “deep concern and dismay,” according to the Organization of American Historians (OAH). “No president has the legitimate authority to impose such a review,” the organization said.

The Smithsonian is self-governing its decisions independently from the government, but it receives the majority of its funding from Congress.

The OAH added that the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding is “particularly depressing to see this effort of historical censorship and sanitizing.”

The Trump administration announced that it had ordered museums to be reviewed in advance of the milestone anniversary that will be observed in 2025.

Although exceptions continued, it wasn’t until decades later, on December 18, 1865, that the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution officially ended chattel slavery.

[File: Will Oliver/EPA] The National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, DC, opened in 2016]

One of the museums that the White House reviewed is the National Museum of African American History and Culture, which opened in 2016 under the direction of then-President Barack Obama.

Visitors can find exhibits ranging from a South Carolina plantation cabin to Chuck Berry’s red Cadillac convertible, according to the museum’s website, which include information about the “richness and diversity of the African American experience.”

The Trump administration’s “sweeping review” of Smithsonian exhibits has also piqued the organization’s concern.

The administration’s efforts to rewrite history are “a betrayal of our democratic traditions and a deeply concerning attempt to strip truth from the institutions that tell our national story,” according to Hadar Harris, the managing director of PEN America’s Washington, DC office.

Trump has threatened to cut funding for top US educational institutions, citing pro-Palestinian protests against transgender policies, climate initiatives, and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

The government resolved allegations against Brown University and Columbia University last month, which both agreed to pay $ 221 million. Additionally, both institutions accepted certain government requirements, including how to teach certain subjects.

Israel’s Netanyahu lashes out at France’s Macron, Australian PM Albanese

After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed French President Emmanuel Macron was behind the “anti-Semitic fire” in France by proposing to grant Palestinian statehood, a diplomatic row erupted between Israel and Paris.

A letter from the AFP news agency on Tuesday that claimed anti-Semitism had “spewed” in France following President Macron’s recent declaration that he would recognize Palestine as a state at a meeting of the UN General Assembly next month contained Netanyahu’s accusation against the French leader.

On Tuesday, the French president’s office quickly retaliated against Netanyahu, calling his allegations “abject” and “erroneous” and promising that they “will not go unanswered.”

The French presidency stated that “this is a time for seriousness and responsibility, not conflation and manipulation,” adding that France “protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens.”

It stated that “violence against the]French] Jewish community is unacceptable.

The deputy minister for European affairs, Benjamin Haddad, said that France had “no lessons to learn” from Netanyahu’s letter.

Haddad claimed that the problem, “which is poisoning our European societies,” should not be “exploited.”

According to reports, France, which is home to the largest Jewish community in Europe, has joined the 193 UN members who currently or intends to recognize a Palestinian state.

Encourages the Jew-hatred that is currently persecuting your streets.

Netanyahu wrote to Macron in a letter stating, “Your call for a Palestinian state adds more to this antisemitic fire.” It’s appeasement rather than diplomacy. It encourages the Jew-hatred that is currently persecuting your streets, encourages Hamas’s terror, and strengthens Hamas’s refusal to release the hostages.

Netanyahu and Macron’s diplomatic spat come as Netanyahu accused Israeli Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of being “a weak politician who abandoned Australia’s Jews and betrayed Israel.”

Simcha Rothman, an Israeli politician whose ultranationalist party makes up Netanyahu’s ruling coalition, was denied visa by the Albanese government on Monday.

Rothman was scheduled to speak at the Australian Jewish Association’s events.

Gideon Saar, Israel’s foreign minister, announced a few hours later that he had revoked Australia’s ambassador’s visas for the Palestinian Authority.

Saar added that I have given the Israeli Embassy in Canberra a thorough look at any official Australian visa applications for entry into Israel.

He said, “This comes in response to Australia’s decision to recognize a “palestinian state” and in response to Australia’s justified refusal to grant visas to a number of Israeli figures.

Penny Wong, the Australian government’s foreign affairs minister, called Israel’s decision to revoke diplomats’ visas an “unjustified response” and claimed that Netanyahu’s government was causing the country’s diplomatic isolation to worsen.

The Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts for peace and a two-state solution, according to Wong in a statement.

Netanyahu was “in denial” about the humanitarian crisis brought on by Israel’s punishing war on Gaza, according to Albanese last week.

More than 700, 000 people in the war-ravaged territory have been forcibly displaced and re-displaced by Israeli forces, according to Jens Laerke, a spokesman for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, who reported on Tuesday that Israeli authorities had prohibited shelter items like tents from entering Gaza for about five months.

Because it thinks tent poles could be used for military purposes, Laerke claimed that Israel has classified tents as “dual use.”

Thameen Al-Kheetan, a spokesman for the UN Human Rights Office, warned that the occupation of Gaza City by Israel was a potential humanitarian disaster.

No US troops in Ukraine, Trump says

In the event of a resolution to end Russia’s civil war in Ukraine, US President Donald Trump has ruled out sending US troops there to ensure the country’s security.

Trump responded to a question from Fox News on Tuesday regarding assurances he could offer that US troops would not be stationed to defend Ukraine’s borders: “You have my assurance, and I am president. I’m merely attempting to prevent people from killing.

Trump claimed that while Europe was willing to send troops to Ukraine, the US could also provide assistance “by air.”

Trump stated on the Fox &amp, Friends program, “We’re willing to help them with things, especially if you talk to them on air,” adding that no one has the kind of stuff we have.

“I don’t believe there will be a problem,” he said.

Later, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated that Washington would support “coordination” and “possibility provide other means of security guarantees” but that any peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv would not include US troops.

In his most recent effort to end the three-and-a-half-year conflict, Trump made the comments the day after hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and top European leaders at the White House.

The issue of how to ensure Ukraine’s post-war security continues to be a major sticking point in the negotiations over ending the war, Zelenskyy and European leaders said on Monday as positive and productive.

Moscow has repeatedly refuted Trump’s suggestion that Russian President Vladimir Putin might permit the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine to support a peace deal.

In addition, it seems that Russia and Ukraine are far apart on the subject of negotiating a comprehensive peace deal before implementing a ceasefire.

Trump also gave more details about his plans for a bilateral summit between Putin and Zelenskyy, telling conservative radio host Mark Levin that “they’re in the process of setting it up.”

Moscow has not confirmed that the Russian leader will attend a summit, despite Zelenskyy’s declaration that he is ready to meet Putin.

Despite the International Criminal Court’s still-open arrest warrant for the Russian leader, Swiss foreign affairs minister Ignazio Cassis announced to the national broadcaster that his nation would be willing to host a Putin-Zelenskyy summit on Tuesday.