Still no Salah but make room for Eze – FPL team of the week

BBC Sport
  • 13 Comments

Fantasy Premier League managers who ditched Mohamed Salah – he is now owned by fewer than four in 10 teams – will be looking nervously at Liverpool’s home game against Manchester United.

Salah has 13 goals and six assists in 15 league matches against United, which is some record.

This is where you need to decide what matters most to you as an FPL manager – form, statistics or history.

In both form and statistics Salah is not worth the price at the moment, with just two goals and four returns this season. His expected goals is just 2.13 in seven games and he’s only had five shots on target.

So this team of the week has no Salah, Erling Haaland as captain and the budget spread more evenly.

Of course, that decision could go spectacularly wrong!

The team of the week is selected based on current FPL prices to fit within a £100m budget, as if you were playing a Free Hit.

How did last week’s team do?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

A monster week, with all but two players returning!

Antoine Semenyo was the star again, with 18 points, but 38 points from double Arsenal and double Newcastle defence propped up the week.

FPL team of the week for gameweek eight

BBC Sport's FPL team of the weekBBC Sport

Keeper and defence

Bart Verbruggen, Brighton, keeper, £4.4m – Newcastle (h)

Much has been made of Newcastle’s superb defensive start to the season, with a league-high five clean sheets.

But away from home they have scored ZERO goals – three 0-0 draws – and managed just six shots on target. If that trend continues, Brighton have a decent chance of a first clean sheet of the season.

Gabriel (£6.3m) and Jurrien Timber (£5.9m), Arsenal – Fulham (a)

Last week I wrote: “West Ham (h), Fulham (a), Crystal Palace (h), Sunderland (a), Burnley (a).

“That’s a sweet run for Arsenal and it makes sense to invest in their defenders.”

And that point still stands. Get at least one Arsenal defensive asset in and set and forget for that run.

The duo paid off last week with a combined 19 points. Fulham away is always a tricky game to call but they might be without a recognised striker again.

Omar Alderete, Sunderland, £4.1m – Wolves (h)

The Paraguayan and his centre-back partner Nordi Mukiele (£4m) are both great budget defensive options and this is a great week to start them.

Alderete has gathered 53 defensive contributions points this season, getting the two-point bonus twice. Mukiele has a similar record (48 and bonus twice).

Midfielders

Eberechi Eze, Arsenal, £7.6m – Fulham (a)

With Martin Odegaard set for a spell on the sidelines, Eze looks set for an extended run in the Arsenal side and that makes him a very intriguing FPL option.

He tops most underlying statistics for Arsenal midfielders. His 17 shots translates to an average of 3.85 shots per 90 minutes – Bukayo Saka is next best at 2.33 – and 11 of those have been in the box.

Bear in mind he is yet to score and you could say “he’s due”!

Eze has been involved in 38% of Arsenal’s goals when he’s on the pitch, which is huge in an Arsenal side with so many good players.

Involved, playing well and a good price. Get him on your radar.

Antoine Semenyo, Bournemouth, £7.9m – Crystal Palace (a)

This slot is reserved for Semenyo until further notice. Palace away is not the easiest game but he might just be fixture proof.

Jaidon Anthony, Burnley, £5.7m – Leeds (h)

Leeds are a side you can target away from home, where their expected goals conceded (xGC) is more than double their record at Elland Road – 5.5 to 2.3.

Four-goal Anthony is proving to be Burnley’s best goal threat and is a nice price if you are looking for a rotatable fifth midfielder.

These are the kind of games you play him in – home to a fellow promoted side – and Burnley have a point to prove after a poor start.

Jeremy Doku, Manchester City, £6.6m – Everton (h)

Doku is a bit of a minutes risk but his past two home games have each resulted in 10-point hauls.

Behind Haaland, he is City’s most creative player so far – involved in 27% of the team’s goals when on the pitch.

With his explosive pace, you’d fancy him to have joy against Everton’s Jake O’Brien who, despite playing well this season, is still a 6ft 6in centre-back playing as a full-back.

Enzo Fernandez, Chelsea, £6.7m – Nottingham Forest (a)

Cole Palmer’s injury is bad news for Chelsea but good news for Fernandez’s FPL value as he is likely to continue playing in an advanced role.

Among all players in the league he has the fourth-highest xG so far at 3.66, and the second-highest among midfielders.

We’re raving about Semenyo, whose xG is mildly better at 3.73, so does this make Fernandez the next best midfield pick?

He’s had eight shots in the box, six big chances, three goals. With better finishing he’d have more and is also on penalties.

Strikers

Erling Haaland (captain), Manchester City, £14.5m – Everton (h)

Like Semenyo, you really don’t want to go without Haaland at the moment.

The lack of alternative premium assets – especially with Palmer injured – means you all should be able to fit him in your teams.

Jarrod Bowen, West Ham, £7.7m – Brentford (h)

Bowen’s switch from midfielder to forward this season put a lot of FPL managers off but he has quietly excelled and is the third-highest scoring forward.

With a lack of forward options in general – and a decent fixture run, including Leeds and Burnley in the next four – Bowen could be the next best punt.

Substitutes’ bench

Martin Dubravka, Burnley, keeper, £4m – Leeds (h)

Dominic Calvert-Lewin, Leeds, £5.5m, striker – Burnley (a)

Josko Gvardiol, Manchester City, £5.9m, defender – Everton (h)

Marc Guehi, Crystal Palace, £4.9m, defender – Bournemouth (h)

Related topics

  • Sunderland
  • West Ham United
  • Burnley
  • Premier League
  • Manchester City
  • Bournemouth
  • Arsenal
  • Football
    • 15 August
    A graphic of Premier League players from every team in the division in 2025-26 season, with the Premier League trophy in front of them.
  • Quiz logo

More on this story

Overseas La Liga game ‘good for football’ says Spain football chief

Getty Images

La Liga’s decision to move the fixture between Villarreal and Barcelona to Miami in December is “good for football”, says Spanish football federation (RFEF) president Rafael Louzan.

In August, the RFEF approved plans for the game that had been due to be hosted at Villarreal’s Estadio de la Ceramica to instead take place at Hard Rock Stadium on 20 December.

Real Madrid expressed opposition, stating the consequences would be “so serious” and lead to a “before and after” for the world of football.

Confirmation of the Miami game followed a decision by the Italian football federation (FIGC) to sanction a Serie A match between AC Milan and Como to be played in Perth, Australia in February.

“It’s a reward for those fans who are behind the screen, also in Asia or America, who are paying a fee to watch all the Spanish La Liga matches. It’s a gesture to them,” Louzan said.

“It’s good for football and it promotes the Spanish La Liga around the world. Italy is also going to do it with Serie A in Australia. It’s a good move for the best league in the world to do it.”

European football’s governing body Uefa was in “clear opposition” to the plans but “reluctantly” gave approval because there was no legal framework to stop it.

Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin said it was a “regrettable” decision to allow two European league matches to be played overseas and insisted it “shall not be seen as setting a precedent”.

Barcelona’s greatest ever player, Lionel Messi, has made Miami his home since joining Inter Miami in 2023 following a two-season spell at Paris St-Germain.

Joan Laporta, Barcelona’s president, said when the fixture was announced: “A competitive game in a city like Miami, with a large FC Barcelona following, will definitely be a great show.”

Related topics

  • Spanish La Liga
  • Barcelona
  • Villarreal
  • Football

More on this story

    • 17 hours ago
    Lionel Messi looks on
    • 15 August
    A graphic of Premier League players from every team in the division in 2025-26 season, with the Premier League trophy in front of them.
    • 16 August
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

Climate study finds overheating world will add 57 superhot days a year

A new study by World Weather Attribution and United States-based Climate Central has calculated the increase in dangerous “superhot days” – defined as warmer than 90 percent of comparable days between 1991 and 2020 – due to climate change.

The report, which is not yet peer-reviewed but uses established techniques for climate attribution, was released on Thursday. It highlights the significant effect of the Paris Climate Agreement.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Before the 2015 accord, the world was on track for a catastrophic 4C (7.2F) of warming by the end of the century, which would have resulted in an additional 114 superhot days per year.

By fulfilling current commitments to curb emissions, the world is now heading towards 2.6C (4.7F) of warming. Under this scenario, the Earth will still add 57 superhot days annually by 2100 – nearly two months of dangerously high temperatures – but this is half the increase of the worst-case scenario. Since 2015, the world has already added 11 superhot days on average.

Potsdam Climate Institute Director Johan Rockstrom, who was not part of the research team, said people should not be relieved that we are no longer on the 4-degree warming pre-Paris trajectory because the current track “would still imply a disastrous future for billions of humans on Earth”.

The report does not say how many people will be affected by the additional dangerously hot days, but coauthor Friederike Otto of Imperial College London said “it will definitely be tens of thousands or millions, not less”. She noted that thousands die in heatwaves each year already.

The study also underscores the profound unfairness of the impact of climate change across the world, showing a massive disconnect between carbon pollution and expected heat exposure.

The 10 countries that will experience the biggest increase in dangerous heat days are almost all small, ocean-dependent nations like Panama, the Solomon Islands, and Samoa. These countries are expected to see the largest spikes, with Panama projected to face 149 extra superhot days a year. These 10 nations collectively produce only 1 percent of global heat-trapping gases.

In stark contrast, the top carbon-polluting countries – the United States, China, and India – are predicted to get only between 23 and 30 extra superhot days. Despite being responsible for 42 percent of the world’s carbon dioxide, they will face less than 1 percent of the additional superhot days.

Meghan Markle breaks silence on Netflix ‘downgrade’ and compares herself to Obamas

Following reports that Prince Harry and Meghan’s deal with streaming giant Netflix has been ‘downgraded’, the Duchess has revealed the real state of affairs during a sit-down

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, has finally addressed her Netflix deal in a candid sit-down chat.

It’s been a packed few weeks for the former royal, who popped up at the Balenciaga show during Paris Fashion Week before receiving an award alongside her husband, Prince Harry. However, her most recent outing saw her dive into a series of topics, including the changing deal terms with streaming giant Netflix, which the couple has worked with since 2020, when they stepped back as working royals.

The multi-year deal was one of a series of high-profile business ventures that they created as they began to fund their own lifestyle.

It was reported at the time to be worth £75 million, and their offerings for the streaming giant included their self-titled documentary series, which covered their love story and royal exit, Meghan’s lifestyle show, With Love, Meghan, and Polo – a documentary series looking at the world of the elite sport and the lives of some players.

Not all of Meghan and Harry’s productions with Netflix have been well received, with even their bombshell documentary that broke viewing records accused by some critics of retreading old ground.

This year, it was announced that the couple had signed a new, more flexible deal with Netflix, which gave the company a ‘first look’ option on any of the couple’s ideas, with the Sussexes then able to take these elsewhere if the streaming giant passed on them. This was, by many critics and commentators, seen as something of a “downgrade” by one PR expert, after some of the lacklustre offerings from Harry and Meghan had struggled to appeal to a wide audience or receive rave reviews across the board.

However, during a sit-down with Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit 2025, Meghan explained to Alyson Shontell, Editor-in-Chief and Chief Content Officer for Fortune, the details of the couple’s ongoing working relationship with Netflix, providing a more positive outlook than some had assumed.

“My husband and I were in an overall deal with Netflix, and then not just similar to Higher Ground in the Obamas’ deal, once that had come to its term, the extension of it, which was such an incredible sign of the strength of our partnership, was now being in a first-look deal,” Meghan explained.

“Which is also exciting, because it gives us flexibility to go to our partners first, and then at the same time, to be able to shop content that might not be the right fit for Netflix, but has a home somewhere else.”

The Duchess also said she was “grateful” for the “creative partnership” she has with Netflix, who work with her in conjunction on her As Ever lifestyle brand.

Article continues below

Despite Meghan’s positivity about the new chapter with the streaming platform, PR expert Mark Borkowski previously said he believed the first-look deal to be a “downgrade” for the couple, explaining that Netflix had, in his view, “done a very neat job of pivoting away from two very expensive people who didn’t deliver”.

Meghan and Harry also inked major deals with Penguin Random House – which published Harry’s bombshell memoir Spare – and Spotify back in 2020, the latter of which was estimated to be worth £18 million.

A week after the floods, central Mexico still reels from the devastation

The stench of decay extends miles beyond Poza Rica in one of the regions most devastated by last week’s torrential rains that inundated central and eastern Mexico.

By Wednesday, the official death toll had reached 66, with the number of missing people increasing to 75. Nearly 200 communities remain isolated — predominantly in Hidalgo’s central mountainous region, where persistent cloud cover has hindered helicopter access.

A persistent dust cloud hangs over the main avenue of Poza Rica, a gulf-adjacent oil-producing city, where soldiers laboured continuously. To the east, near the overflowed Cazones River, numerous streets remained submerged under 3 feet (about 1 metre) of water and mud, covered by an additional 6 feet of accumulated rubbish, furniture, and debris.

“A week later, this looks horrible — worse. You can’t even cross the street,” lamented Ana Luz Saucedo, who escaped with her children when water rushed in “like the sea”.

She now fears disease because a decomposing body near her home remains uncollected. “The dead body has already started to rot, and no one has come for him.”

The impact of last week’s catastrophic rains, floods, and landslides continues to unfold as Mexico’s government proceeds with rescue and recovery operations.

Officials attribute the disaster to multiple converging weather systems — two tropical systems colliding with warm and cold fronts — arriving as an unusually intense rainy season concluded, leaving saturated rivers and unstable hillsides.

Residents like Saucedo believe warnings were insufficient, particularly in Poza Rica.

“Many people died because they didn’t give notice — really, they didn’t warn us,” she said. “They came only when the river was already overflowing … not before, so people could evacuate.”

President Claudia Sheinbaum explained that alert systems for such events differ from hurricane warnings. She acknowledged the need to review river maintenance and emergency protocols after the crisis to determine “what worked, what we need to improve and whether there are better alert mechanisms”.

Military, naval, and civilian emergency teams continue operating across affected states, supplemented by hundreds of volunteers.

In Poza Rica, women from Veracruz distributed clothing and 1,000 pots of homemade tamales to flood victims.