Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Dancing On Ice studio ‘in tears’ as fans emotional over Torvill and Dean’s last performance

The “final” skating routine of Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean on TV had some fans emotional tonight.

Jayne, 67, and Christopher, 66, previously announced plans to retire after having skated together for decades. The pair – who won gold at the Olympics in 1984 for their routine to Maurice Ravel’s Boléro – skated together for the last time on TV for the finale of Dancing on Ice’s latest series, which aired on ITV earlier this evening, ahead of their final tour.

They took to the ice for a performance that was set to Lighthouse Family’s song Lifted. Jayne and Christopher was seen in co-ordinated purple outfits, seemingly in a nod to their costumes for their iconic Boléro routine more than 40 years ago. They were also joined by professional skaters from DOI, who sported the same colour with their outfits.

Viewers saw Jayne and Christopher skate together before briefly standing by the side of the rink as they watched the other pros perform in front of them. The pair joined them moments later to continue the routine, which ended with the two judges being lifted up by colleagues. They later bowed as Stephen Mulhern said: “The legendary Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean”. Holly Willoughby added: “Just so good. ]The crowd] are all on their feet behind us and quite rightly so. What an amazing moment that was”!

Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean, and pros, on Dancing On Ice, all in purple outfits, after a routine.
Jayne Torvill (left) and Christopher Dean (right) were seen performing together for the ‘ last time on TV ‘ in tonight’s Dancing On Ice final (ITV)

The Sun reports that a source has claimed that the routine, choreographed by Jayne and Christopher, was filmed in advance for time reasons. A source told the outlet: “No one in the audience had a clue they were about see such a historic moment”. They added: “It was really emotional to watch and there were plenty of tears in the studio”.

Fans shared their thoughts over the performance on X, with some suggesting that it left them emotional. One person wrote: “Not me getting emotional watching Torvill and Dean’s last ever skate…” Another viewer wrote in a post beside a crying emoji: “Awww Torvill and Dean, end of an era”.

A third fan commented: “How emotional was that last ever dance from Torvill and Dean”. Alongside a teary-eyed emoji, another viewer said: “Torvill &amp, Dean’s final performance was STUNNING”. Sharing their thoughts, someone wrote: “Torvill &amp, Dean’s last ever tv performance! I’m so emotional”.

“It’s the end of an era for Torvill and Dean. I’m not crying you are”, read another post over the routine. Whilst one fan said on the platform tonight: “Torvill and Dean, a very special duo. It’s been an honour to watch you skate together”.

The pair are yet to embark on their final tour, Torvill &amp, Dean: Our Last Dance, which will run from April to July. Speaking to the Mirror prior to DOI’s return, Christopher said: “We’re doing our last tour this year as well so once we’ve finished our last skate on tour, we won’t be performing again”.

Following their routine on DOI, it was announced that Coronation Street star Sam Aston and his skating partner Molly Lanaghan had won the latest series. The actor competed in the final against Michaela Strachan and Anton Ferdinand, who ended up placing second and third respectively.

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

Does cricket risk apathy if status quo continues?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It concluded 1, 000km from where it started, 2, 000km from where it should have ended.

India were crowned 2025 Champions Trophy winners on Sunday in Dubai after making hard work of a four-wicket win over New Zealand.

The win cemented India’s place as the leading white-ball side in the world, coming after their victory in the T20 World Cup last June, and eases the pain of the defeat by Australia in Ahmedabad at their own 50-over World Cup 16 months ago.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It has seemed like India’s from the start with visits to their matches feeling more like an exhibition while the rest of the action took place in Pakistan.

Teams were flown in to face 11 superstars in immaculate electric blue in front of thousands wearing those players ‘ names on their backs.

Would Hardik Pandya have been introduced in Lahore with deafening cries of “Kung-fu Pand-ya”!, as he was in Dubai?

Sadly, we will never know.

It should be made clear, there are no easy answers here.

India announced they would not travel to Pakistan in December because of long-standing political tensions between the two nations. The International Cricket Council (ICC) has been in a tricky spot ever since.

Play the tournament without India? Indian markets make up a significant portion of the ICC’s income, reported to be as much as 80%.

Take away the opportunity for Pakistan to host a first tournament for 29 years at the last minute? Not feasible either.

The result was India playing the tournament in one city, remaining in one hotel, as the row over the advantages they held rumbled on throughout.

New Zealand covered more than 7, 000km travelling to matches, while the nearest an India player got to a plane was Kuldeep Yadav’s wide-armed celebration after claiming the crucial wicket of Rachin Ravindra in the final.

At every turn, India denied the obvious, until Mohammed Shami said the situation had “definitely” helped them after their semi-final. Moments earlier, in the same room, coach Gautam Gambhir suggested anyone that said so needed to “grow up”.

Opposition players remained largely quiet, until South Africa’s David Miller said he would be supporting New Zealand in the final.

Speak to players in private and the power India seemingly hold is simply met with a shrug. This is the path cricket is on.

In 2023, there was the controversy of the semi-final pitch switched at the last minute in a move that appeared to suit India’s spinners.

Eight months ago, India beat England in the T20 semi-final in Guyana, when again Rohit Sharma was the only captain to know where his side’s matches would be played before departure.

That fixture was played at 10: 30am to suit Indian TV, limiting the local crowd. This time India’s last group match was played on a Sunday – when TV viewership in India is highest – and caused the farcical situation of South Africa having to fly to Dubai but return to Pakistan less than 24 hours later.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Of course, none of this is the fault of India’s players.

Rohit, who caused a stir by sending vice-captain Shubman Gill to the pre-final captains ‘ interview this week, and Virat Kohli are two 50-over greats.

Ravindra Jadeja, who hit the winning runs against New Zealand, is not far behind, while Gill will probably get there too if given the chance.

India’s strength is such that they might well have won this tournament wherever it was played. The fact they have not had injured star fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah for the Champions Trophy has largely been forgotten.

But these ICC men’s events – increased in number to include either a Champions Trophy, T20 or 50-over World Cup every year until 2031 – are supposed to be the internationals game’s counter to the money-spinning Indian Premier League.

Instead, they now come so often, follow such a familiar pattern, that indifference is perhaps beginning to set in.

There were no written journalists from India’s fellow semi-finalists, Australia, South Africa or New Zealand, at the Champions Trophy – hardly the sign of a healthy sport.

The fallout from England’s dismal exit was loud among the diehards but outside of that?

You be the judge about whether this tournament came up in the family WhatsApp group.

Their chaotic organisation does not help either, with the schedule for this competition confirmed just 57 days before it began.

No English media were able to witness that Guyana semi-final because of the quick turnaround, a lack of flights and the fact it took place in a country US authorities advise against visiting on safety grounds.

In cricket, these things are simply waved through.

Things will not get easier in the next two tournaments – the women’s World Cup later this year and the men’s T20 version in the spring of 2026.

Both will be held in India, in partnership with Sri Lanka in the case of the T20, meaning should Pakistan qualify they will get the treatment their rivals had here.

Pakistan could find themselves with the same advantages India had but uncertainties – two venues needed to be lined up for a final – are not going anywhere.

It is not that hope is lost.

This tournament has shown, yet again, that the product of international white-ball cricket on the field remains strong, despite two washouts and too many one-sided games.

Australia batter Josh Inglis ‘ century against England was an all-timer, Ravindra continued to emerge as one of the next stars of the sport and Afghanistan all-rounder Azmatullah Omarzai should be the want of every Hundred team in Wednesday’s draft.

Related topics

  • Cricket

Does cricket risk apathy if status quo continues?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It concluded 1, 000km from where it started, 2, 000km from where it should have ended.

India were crowned 2025 Champions Trophy winners on Sunday in Dubai after making hard work of a four-wicket win over New Zealand.

The win cemented India’s place as the leading white-ball side in the world, coming after their victory in the T20 World Cup last June, and eases the pain of the defeat by Australia in Ahmedabad at their own 50-over World Cup 16 months ago.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It has seemed like India’s from the start with visits to their matches feeling more like an exhibition while the rest of the action took place in Pakistan.

Teams were flown in to face 11 superstars in immaculate electric blue in front of thousands wearing those players ‘ names on their backs.

Would Hardik Pandya have been introduced in Lahore with deafening cries of “Kung-fu Pand-ya”!, as he was in Dubai?

Sadly, we will never know.

It should be made clear, there are no easy answers here.

India announced they would not travel to Pakistan in December because of long-standing political tensions between the two nations. The International Cricket Council (ICC) has been in a tricky spot ever since.

Play the tournament without India? Indian markets make up a significant portion of the ICC’s income, reported to be as much as 80%.

Take away the opportunity for Pakistan to host a first tournament for 29 years at the last minute? Not feasible either.

The result was India playing the tournament in one city, remaining in one hotel, as the row over the advantages they held rumbled on throughout.

New Zealand covered more than 7, 000km travelling to matches, while the nearest an India player got to a plane was Kuldeep Yadav’s wide-armed celebration after claiming the crucial wicket of Rachin Ravindra in the final.

At every turn, India denied the obvious, until Mohammed Shami said the situation had “definitely” helped them after their semi-final. Moments earlier, in the same room, coach Gautam Gambhir suggested anyone that said so needed to “grow up”.

Opposition players remained largely quiet, until South Africa’s David Miller said he would be supporting New Zealand in the final.

Speak to players in private and the power India seemingly hold is simply met with a shrug. This is the path cricket is on.

In 2023, there was the controversy of the semi-final pitch switched at the last minute in a move that appeared to suit India’s spinners.

Eight months ago, India beat England in the T20 semi-final in Guyana, when again Rohit Sharma was the only captain to know where his side’s matches would be played before departure.

That fixture was played at 10: 30am to suit Indian TV, limiting the local crowd. This time India’s last group match was played on a Sunday – when TV viewership in India is highest – and caused the farcical situation of South Africa having to fly to Dubai but return to Pakistan less than 24 hours later.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Of course, none of this is the fault of India’s players.

Rohit, who caused a stir by sending vice-captain Shubman Gill to the pre-final captains ‘ interview this week, and Virat Kohli are two 50-over greats.

Ravindra Jadeja, who hit the winning runs against New Zealand, is not far behind, while Gill will probably get there too if given the chance.

India’s strength is such that they might well have won this tournament wherever it was played. The fact they have not had injured star fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah for the Champions Trophy has largely been forgotten.

But these ICC men’s events – increased in number to include either a Champions Trophy, T20 or 50-over World Cup every year until 2031 – are supposed to be the internationals game’s counter to the money-spinning Indian Premier League.

Instead, they now come so often, follow such a familiar pattern, that indifference is perhaps beginning to set in.

There were no written journalists from India’s fellow semi-finalists, Australia, South Africa or New Zealand, at the Champions Trophy – hardly the sign of a healthy sport.

The fallout from England’s dismal exit was loud among the diehards but outside of that?

You be the judge about whether this tournament came up in the family WhatsApp group.

Their chaotic organisation does not help either, with the schedule for this competition confirmed just 57 days before it began.

No English media were able to witness that Guyana semi-final because of the quick turnaround, a lack of flights and the fact it took place in a country US authorities advise against visiting on safety grounds.

In cricket, these things are simply waved through.

Things will not get easier in the next two tournaments – the women’s World Cup later this year and the men’s T20 version in the spring of 2026.

Both will be held in India, in partnership with Sri Lanka in the case of the T20, meaning should Pakistan qualify they will get the treatment their rivals had here.

Pakistan could find themselves with the same advantages India had but uncertainties – two venues needed to be lined up for a final – are not going anywhere.

It is not that hope is lost.

This tournament has shown, yet again, that the product of international white-ball cricket on the field remains strong, despite two washouts and too many one-sided games.

Australia batter Josh Inglis ‘ century against England was an all-timer, Ravindra continued to emerge as one of the next stars of the sport and Afghanistan all-rounder Azmatullah Omarzai should be the want of every Hundred team in Wednesday’s draft.

Related topics

  • Cricket

When could Liverpool seal Premier League title?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 1715 Comments

Liverpool’s march to the Premier League title seems inevitable after they increased their lead at the top of the table to 15 points.

No team in English top-flight history, going all the way back to 1888-89, has been this far clear at this stage of the season and not won the title.

The Reds have only lost once in the league all season – and beat Southampton 3-1 on Saturday. Meanwhile, second-placed Arsenal have dropped points in each of their past three games – including their 1-1 draw with Manchester United on Sunday.

“Liverpool will look at it and think ‘ Arsenal have almost given up the title race'”, former Manchester United captain Roy Keane said on Sky Sports.

And former Arsenal midfielder Paul Merson added: “I will be saying now that Arsenal need to concentrate to get into the Premier League top four.

” Liverpool are too far away. They have only lost one game all season. ]The title race] is over. “

Nottingham Forest are third, four points behind Arsenal, and Chelsea another two points further back in fourth.

Manchester City, who have won the past four Premier League titles, sit fifth after losing 1-0 at Nottingham Forest on Saturday.

What dates could the Reds be looking at?

It is fair to say the Anfield club are champions elect now – so it is a matter of when and not if.

Statisticians Opta give Liverpool a 99.66% chance of winning the title. Arsenal are 15 points behind with a game in hand but have just a 0.34% off finishing top.

The Reds need 16 points out of a possible 27 to guarantee the title, with Arsenal only able to obtain a maximum of 85 points.

If Liverpool win their next five games and Arsenal their next six, taking into account their game in hand, then Arne Slot’s side would need just a solitary point from their encounter against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge on 3 May to be crowned champions.

If Liverpool win their next two fixtures and both Arsenal and Nottingham Forest lose their next four then the Reds will be champions on 12 April.

Getty Images

Liverpool’s final Premier League games (dates subject to change)

2 April: Everton (H)

5 April: Fulham (A)

12 April: West Ham (H)

19 April: Leicester (A)

26 April: Tottenham (H)

3 May: Chelsea (A)

10 May: Arsenal (H)

18 May: Brighton (A)

Could Liverpool break any records?

Liverpool would need everything to go their way to equal their own record of winning the title with seven games to go in 2019-20.

Equalling the five games left of Manchester United (2000-01) and Manchester City (2017-18) is more achievable.

United (1999-2000 and 2012-13) and Arsenal (2003-04) did it with four games to spare.

The earliest date a title has been won by was 14 April 2001 when United were crowned champions.

For Liverpool to beat that record they would need to increase their lead over Arsenal significantly.

The Reds know that if they win it, it will be earlier in the year than their only other Premier League title – which came on 25 June 2020 in the Covid-interupted season.

Arne Slot’s side would have to extend their lead at the top by seven points to record the biggest margin of victory in a Premier League season.

Manchester City finished 19 points clear of Manchester United in 2017-18 when they won the Premier League title with a record 100 points.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Related topics

  • Liverpool
  • Premier League
  • Football

When could Liverpool seal Premier League title?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

  • 1715 Comments

Liverpool’s march to the Premier League title seems inevitable after they increased their lead at the top of the table to 15 points.

No team in English top-flight history, going all the way back to 1888-89, has been this far clear at this stage of the season and not won the title.

The Reds have only lost once in the league all season – and beat Southampton 3-1 on Saturday. Meanwhile, second-placed Arsenal have dropped points in each of their past three games – including their 1-1 draw with Manchester United on Sunday.

“Liverpool will look at it and think ‘ Arsenal have almost given up the title race'”, former Manchester United captain Roy Keane said on Sky Sports.

And former Arsenal midfielder Paul Merson added: “I will be saying now that Arsenal need to concentrate to get into the Premier League top four.

” Liverpool are too far away. They have only lost one game all season. ]The title race] is over. “

Nottingham Forest are third, four points behind Arsenal, and Chelsea another two points further back in fourth.

Manchester City, who have won the past four Premier League titles, sit fifth after losing 1-0 at Nottingham Forest on Saturday.

What dates could the Reds be looking at?

It is fair to say the Anfield club are champions elect now – so it is a matter of when and not if.

Statisticians Opta give Liverpool a 99.66% chance of winning the title. Arsenal are 15 points behind with a game in hand but have just a 0.34% off finishing top.

The Reds need 16 points out of a possible 27 to guarantee the title, with Arsenal only able to obtain a maximum of 85 points.

If Liverpool win their next five games and Arsenal their next six, taking into account their game in hand, then Arne Slot’s side would need just a solitary point from their encounter against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge on 3 May to be crowned champions.

If Liverpool win their next two fixtures and both Arsenal and Nottingham Forest lose their next four then the Reds will be champions on 12 April.

Getty Images

Liverpool’s final Premier League games (dates subject to change)

2 April: Everton (H)

5 April: Fulham (A)

12 April: West Ham (H)

19 April: Leicester (A)

26 April: Tottenham (H)

3 May: Chelsea (A)

10 May: Arsenal (H)

18 May: Brighton (A)

Could Liverpool break any records?

Liverpool would need everything to go their way to equal their own record of winning the title with seven games to go in 2019-20.

Equalling the five games left of Manchester United (2000-01) and Manchester City (2017-18) is more achievable.

United (1999-2000 and 2012-13) and Arsenal (2003-04) did it with four games to spare.

The earliest date a title has been won by was 14 April 2001 when United were crowned champions.

For Liverpool to beat that record they would need to increase their lead over Arsenal significantly.

The Reds know that if they win it, it will be earlier in the year than their only other Premier League title – which came on 25 June 2020 in the Covid-interupted season.

Arne Slot’s side would have to extend their lead at the top by seven points to record the biggest margin of victory in a Premier League season.

Manchester City finished 19 points clear of Manchester United in 2017-18 when they won the Premier League title with a record 100 points.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

Related topics

  • Liverpool
  • Premier League
  • Football

US ends sanctions waiver for Iraq to buy electricity from Iran

The United States has ended a sanctions waiver that allowed Iraq to buy electricity from neighbouring Iran, in line with US President Donald Trump’s policy of exerting “maximum pressure” on Tehran.

In a statement released on Sunday, the US Department of State said the decision not to renew the waiver was made to “ensure we do not allow Iran any degree of economic or financial relief”.

Such a waiver was introduced in 2018, when Washington reimposed sanctions on Tehran after Trump abandoned a nuclear deal with Iran negotiated under US President Barack Obama. Back then, Trump imposed sweeping US sanctions on any other country buying Iran’s oil. The waiver was extended to Iraq as a “key partner” of the US.

Since returning to the White House for a second term as US president in January, Trump has reinstated his policy of exerting “maximum pressure” against Iran.

“The president’s maximum pressure campaign is designed to end Iran’s nuclear threat, curtail its ballistic missile programme, and stop it from supporting terrorist groups”, a spokesman for the US embassy in Baghdad said earlier on Sunday. The spokesman urged Baghdad “to eliminate its dependence on Iranian sources of energy as soon as possible”.

That won’t be an easy task. Despite its oil and gas wealth, Iraq has suffered from decades of electricity shortages because of war, corruption and mismanagement and has become heavily reliant on imported Iranian gas as well as electricity imported directly from Iran to meet its electricity needs.

Three Iraqi energy officials who spoke to Reuters said the country has no immediate alternatives to compensate for the energy imported from Iran, which will cause a significant problem in providing enough electricity to meet domestic consumption. Many Iraqis have to rely on diesel generators or suffer through temperatures that exceed 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit) during the summer months.

The waiver that expired applied to direct electricity imports. It remains unclear whether Iraq will be able to continue to import gas from Iran for its power plants.

The US embassy asserted that electricity imports from Iran were only four percent of electricity consumption in Iraq.

But a spokesperson for Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity, Ahmad Moussa, said that should gas imports also be forbidden, it “would cause Iraq to lose more than 30 percent of its electricity energy”, so the government is looking for alternatives.

Already, Moussa said, Iranian gas had stopped supplying power plants in Baghdad and the central Euphrates region for the past two months, and the supply to southern power plants had been unstable.

A senior official in the electricity ministry told The Associated Press that the ministry had not yet been officially notified of the US decision regarding gas imports.

A ‘ bully ‘

The US administration’s decision to remove the waiver comes two days after Trump said he had written a letter to Iran’s leadership seeking to initiate talks on a nuclear deal. The US president warned of possible military action if Iran did not give in.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei snapped back, saying the country would not negotiate with a “bully” interested in imposing conditions rather than starting negotiations.

Still, the Iranian mission to the United Nations on Sunday suggested Tehran might be willing to discuss certain issues – but not the complete end of its nuclear programme.

“If the objective of negotiations is to address concerns vis-a-vis any potential militarization of Iran’s nuclear program, such discussions may be subject to consideration”, said a statement from the mission.

“However, should the aim be the dismantlement of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program to claim that what Obama failed to achieve has now been accomplished, such negotiations will never take place”.

The landmark 2015 nuclear deal that Obama helped negotiate between Tehran and major powers promised sanctions relief in return for Iran curbing its nuclear programme.