Racism, rape and death threats: One weekend of abuse in football

BBB Sport

Warning: This article contains offensive language references and screenshots.

A BBC investigation has revealed that more than 2, 000 abusive social media posts were sent to Premier League and Women’s Super League managers in one weekend, including death threats and rape threats.

Posts posted during 10 Premier League and six WSL games on the weekend of November 8 and 9 were the subject of an analysis that was carried out with data science firm Signify.

With 82% of abusive posts on X, formerly Twitter, managers received more abuse than players.

The men’s top flight’s most violent managers were Ruben Amorim, Arne Slot, and Eddie Howe, while Chelsea and Sonia Bompastor, their manager, received 50% of all abuse in the WSL.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

People feel like they are being treated unfair online.

According to Liverpool head coach Slot, “Abuse is never a good thing, whether it’s about me or other managers.”

We anticipate being criticized. That is entirely normal. I don’t see it because I don’t have social media, but I do know it exists.

Threat Matrix, an artificial intelligence tool used by Signify, searches social media posts for abuse.

It analyzed more than 500, 000 posts on X, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok over the weekend of matches chosen for the study, and it found 22, 389 potentially abusive messages.

However, those flags occasionally contain examples that aren’t abusive. For instance, references to Newcastle defender Dan Burn can be flagged as a threat due to his surname.

Skip the gallery of images

Thirty-nine posts, including rape threats and monkey emojis on black players’ accounts, were deemed to be serious enough to warrant further investigation, which may involve reporting to football clubs for potential fan identification and referral to law enforcement.

Police received one report, and they decided it lacked the necessary threshold for further action.

Only one of the posts that Meta, which owns and runs Facebook and Instagram, removed, was flagged as unrelated. The investigation continues for the others.

Some of those who were identified as being in the X network were removed, while others were left online and had their reach restricted.

According to Professional Footballers’ Association CEO Maheta Molango, “if this happened on the street, it would have criminal consequences and potentially have financially ill effects.”

Why do people feel like they are protected online, exactly? This needs to end, we must put an end to.

Some players are conscientious that abuse is inevitable.

Newcastle manager Howe said, “It comes with the territory now.”

“My advice is to always try to keep your mind afloat and develop psychological resilience so you don’t have to read it.” However, it’s always that people will show it to you even if you don’t want to.

While X has introduced a tool that displays the country or continent on which an account is based, Meta has implemented tools to help block and filter abuse.

“Really awful, violent content”

The small Signify team quietly combs through thousands of posts in a central London office.

The number of abusive messages rises with each new game.

Despite being solely fueled by actions on a football pitch, there have been numerous up-and-coming posts with racist slurs, threats of rape against managers’ families, and even death threats.

Humans only consider messages that violate social media platforms’ own internal rules to be verified abuse if the AI system determines they are abusive twice.

The most significant increase in abusive posts took place on October 8 during Tottenham’s dramatic 2-2 draw with Manchester United, a game that featured two stoppage-time goals, which caused the teams’ managers and several players to be subject to intense abuse.

Death threats were made to Amorim in messages obtained by the BBC, including one that read, “Kill Amorim, someone get that dirty Portuguese.”

Social media platforms are subject to a statutory duty of care under the Online Safety Act, which became effective in October 2023.

That entails them being legally required to prevent illegal content like harassment or hate speech, such as threats and harassment. The independent regulator that oversees platforms’ compliance is now called OFCOM.

However, the social media platforms claim that they are reluctant to censor or remove content because of their free speech.

Signify asserts that the issue of online threats and serious abuse is getting worse.

According to its CEO, Jonathan Hirshler, “We’ve seen around a 25% increase in the levels of abuse we’re detecting.”

“We understand the platforms’ position on free speech, but some of the topics we’re addressing are so egregious.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Homophobia and threats in WSL

The vast majority of the 97 verified abusive messages posted about WSL matches were caused by controversy during Chelsea’s 1-1 draw at Arsenal on November 8.

Bompastor, Chelsea’s boss, was threatened with violence, and a homophobic slur was used in more than half of the interviews.

“People believe they can say anything from the screen,” the poet said. I want to speak out against that because it’s frightening.

My family includes children, too. They object to those online comments. Because they are so young, people need to understand how it might affect them.

Because the security in the women’s game differs from that in the men’s game, “terrors are a big problem.”

“Abuse can actually lead to mental health issues for players,” the author says. It has a lot of potential.

Jess Carter, an ex-Chelsea player and current England defender, was the target of significant racist abuse during Euro 2025, according to Bompastor, who believes the platforms are at the center of it.

According to Bompastor, “the social media companies are not carrying out their duties or taking accountability.”

“I believe we will be in this situation for too long if we have to wait for them to act.”

How does abuse prevention work in clubs?

More clubs are taking matters into their own hands as the anger between social media companies grows.

In the three years that Arsenal has collaborated with Signify, there has been a 90% decrease in affiliated fan abuse of their own players, coaches, and owners.

Signify attributes this to Arsenal’s ongoing efforts, including putting in educational programs and outlawing supporters from the Emirates who have been identified as abuse senders.

The same company is now employing Chelsea women.

Meanwhile, Tottenham is looking into allegations that visitors to their home base posted abusive content.

Premier League content protection director Tim Cooper stated, “We’re constantly monitoring around games where abuse can occur and we’re looking for triggers like goal-scoring, missed penalties, or even things like yellow and red cards.”

“The platforms can alter their algorithms to do more,” they claim. That would be a positive step.

related subjects

  • Premier League
  • Football
  • Women’s Super League

Sabrina Carpenter condemns ‘evil’ use of her music in White House video

The use of their music and imagery by US President Donald Trump’s administration has been disapproved by Sabrina Carpenter, a popular singer, and Franklin the Turtle, a well-known children’s book publisher.

In a video montage featuring US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, Carpenter responded on social media by using her song Juno from her 2024 album Short n’ Sweet. Never use my music or me to advance your cruel plan.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Have you ever tried this song, lyrics by Carpenter were quoted in the clip’s caption, “Have you ever tried this one? ” Bye-bye”.

Abigail Jackson, a spokesman for the White House, responded in a statement with “we won’t apologize for deporting dangerous criminal criminal illegal murderers, rapists, and pedophiles from our country. Anyone who would stand up for these sick monsters must be foolish, or will it just go away slowly?

Meanwhile, publisher Kids Can Press, a publisher of Franklin the Turtle, condemned US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s post on X that featured a manipulated image of him shooting a bazooka at boats on Monday.

The image was shared by Hegseth with the caption “Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists”

In a post shared on social media, Kids Can Press wrote that “Franklin the Turtle is a beloved Canadian icon who has inspired generations of children and stands for kindness, empathy, and inclusivity.”

The statement further stated that “we firmly condemn any denigrating, violent, or unauthorized use of Franklin’s name or image that directly conflicts with these values.”

Hegseth shared the video as he continues to face allegations that he ordered a second, deadly strike on two survivors of an alleged drug-smuggling boat attack in the Caribbean Sea in September. Following the incident, potential war crimes have been reportedly investigated.

Other artists have voiced opposition to the music used by Trump and his team.

Kenny Loggins, an American singer and guitarist, recently demanded that the president’s song “Dangerous Zone” be removed from the film Top Gun.

Trump was depicted in the video dropping excrement on political opponents using AI-generated images.

Beyonce’s remark in response to Celine Dion’s song “My Heart Will Go On” being used in a campaign video in 2024, and Celine Dion also criticized the song’s use in Freedom the same year.

However, Trump lists a number of musicians among his supporters, including Village People’s only original member Victor Willis.

Trump says he has revoked Biden’s autopen pardons: But can he do it?

Donald Trump, the president of the United States, claims that he has revoked all of his predecessor’s pardons and commutations using an autopen.

On Tuesday evening, Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social, “Any and all Documents, Proclamations, Executive Orders, Memorandums, or Contracts signed by the now infamous and unauthorised ‘Autopen,’ within the Administration of Joseph R. Biden Jr., are hereby null, void, and of no further force or effect.”

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Anybody who receives “Pardons,” “Commutations,” or any other legal document signed, please be informed that the document has been completely and legally terminated and has no legal effect, he said.

However, legal experts contend that the president’s decision is unenforceable.

What documents did Biden sign with the autopen, who will be affected, and is Trump’s move legal?

What documents did Biden and his autopen sign?

Trump has argued on numerous occasions that Biden’s use of the autopen, a mechanical device that makes it possible to sign documents without holding a hand, was indicative of the former president’s physical and mental frailty.

According to the non-partisan Pew Research Center, Biden has issued a record 4,245 clemency acts in his four years in office, more than any other US president since the start of the 20th century.

The majority of these actions involved sentence reductions or commutations. Although he only issued 80 individual pardons, which was the second-lowest number over the same time period, he was more well-known for enacting “pardons by proclamation,” which affected a wide range of people.

According to the Pew Research Center, these included pardons by proclamation for former military personnel who had been found guilty of abusing a gay sex ban, which has since been overturned.

However, it is unclear how many and which pardons and commutations Biden’s orders were executed using an autopen.

Trump does not have the authority to revoke pardons or commutations, according to Bernadette Miller, a Stanford University expert on US and UK constitutional law.

This declaration is legally unenforceable. Any laws or pardons that Biden has authorized remain effective. An executive order, she said, “would be the only exception that an executive order can have until it is overturned by the same president or another president.”

Trump might revoke those orders, so presumably this statement would undo any such orders. However, laws and pardons are still effective.

A separate study from PolitiFact, a fact-checking website run by the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, found that “there is no constitutional mechanism for overturning pardons, and an 1869 judicial ruling determined that a pardon is final.”

According to PolitiFact, the US Constitution does not require a pardon to be formally endorsed by hand.

Who might be impacted by Trump’s action?

Trump has previously argued that autopen signed a number of “preemptive” pardons that Biden gave US legislators as part of their investigation into the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol.

The Capitol was attacked by a mob of Trump supporters who claimed the 2020 election was a fraud and were trying to stop Biden from being elected president by Congress. Trump and his supporters have repeatedly failed to demonstrate widespread election fraud.

Republicans who opted to investigate Trump, such as ex-members of Congress Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, are seen by the US president and his allies as traitors of their movement.

Because they were issued by Autopen, Trump claimed on Truth Social in March that these legislators’ pardons were “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.”

Biden was the first to employ an autopen.

According to PolitiFact, Biden was not the only US president to rely on an autopen.

Similar devices have been around for the majority of American history, but autopens’s design has changed as technology has developed.

The third US president, Thomas Jefferson, used a technique known as a polygraph, which is a pair of pens rigged so that the second can imitate the first’s actions.

John F. Kennedy used a more contemporary version of the autopen in the early 1960s. Barack Obama has occasionally used autopens, more recently.

Venezuela denounces US-ordered ‘forced sale’ of oil company Citgo

Colombia’s Petro invites Trump to cocaine lab demolition amid attack threat

After Trump warned that any nation that imports drugs into the United States could be attacked, “not just Venezuela,” Colombian President Gustavo Petro has invited US President Donald Trump to visit his country and take part in the destruction of cocaine laboratories.

Trump criticized Colombia for producing cocaine and selling it into the US during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday at the White House.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“I’ve heard that Colombia, the nation of Colombia, produces cocaine. Trump claimed that they have cocaine factories, okay, and then sell it to us.

He said, “Anyone who does that and sells it into our country is attacked.”

Petro quickly responded to Trump by claiming that “without missiles” his government had destroyed 18,400 cocaine labs.

“Come to Colombia, Mr. Trump,” Petro remarked.

To stop cocaine from reaching the US, Petro said, “Come with me, and I’ll show you how they are destroyed, one laboratory every 40 minutes.”

Petro cautioned against “threatening Colombia’s sovereignty,” which he claimed would “wake up a Jaguar.”

Avoid compromising two centuries of diplomatic relations. You have already slandered me; don’t go back in that direction, Petro said, making an apparent reference to Trump’s earlier claims that the Colombian leader was a part of the drug trade.

Colombia is the only nation that has assisted in preventing the influx of thousands of tonnes of cocaine from being consumed by North Americans, Petro said.

Colombia continues to be the main gateway to the US market for cocaine, with 84 percent of the cocaine seized there in 2024 coming from Colombia.

At least 83 people were killed when Trump’s administration launched missile attacks on ships in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea while using the pretext to stop the flow of drugs to the US from Venezuela.

Trump was seated next to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is under investigation for a so-called “double-tap” strike in September that left two survivors of an earlier US attack on a vessel in the Caribbean Sea, which had already killed nine people, as he made his remarks about the expansion of attacks against narcotics-exporting nations.

According to legal experts, the second killing of the two survivors as they clung to the wreckage of the devasted vessel could have been a war crime, and both Democrat and Republican lawmakers have pledged to look into the circumstances surrounding the killings.

Hegseth defended the secondary strike, but he claimed on Tuesday that he had not witnessed the second deadly US attack or the first attack despite having witnessed the first one on the suspected drug smuggling vessel in person.

The Pentagon director claimed that he only learned shortly after the second strike on survivors from US Admiral Frank Bradley, the head of special operations command.