Smith had ‘simple decision’ to stay at Northampton

Getty Images

Northampton Saints fly-half Fin Smith says it was a “fairly simple decision” to commit his future to the club.

Smith signed a multi-year contract extension at Saints after months of speculation and will become one of the club’s best paid players.

The 23-year-old moved to Franklin’s Gardens in 2022 following Worcester Warriors’ collapse and has made 63 appearances, while also forcing his way into the England set-up.

“It was a big decision for me,” he told BBC Look East.

“I have so many great memories. I was really welcomed here when I arrived from Worcester a few years ago.

Smith’s signature was one of the most prized in the Prem, with rumours circulating about interest from Newcastle Red Bulls and R360, rugby union’s proposed breakaway league.

“It was weird,” he added. “I saw the headlines on social media and the teams I was linked with. That’s just part of the market I am in.

“I try not to speak to my agent about the white noise. I had options but I spoke with the club, my family and those who mean a lot to me to make sure I was making the right decision.

Fin Smith in action for the British and Irish LionsGetty Images

Lions tour ‘frustrating but an absolute privilege’

This weekend’s East Midlands derby against Leicester Tigers will be Smith’s first game since the British & Irish Lions tour of Australia, having completed his mandatory rest period.

He described the experience as “an absolute privilege”, while admitting to being frustrated with his performances on the pitch.

“When I reflect on it, no one can take that series from me,” he said.

“It is the pinnacle of the sport, but I have enough self-awareness to realise I didn’t play my best rugby on tour and it didn’t go as I would have liked.

“But in terms of the experience, the scale, being around the best players in the world is such a brilliant thing.

“Having been away from the game, gone on my holidays, digested that, it’s been nice to take the emotion out of it.

“Whilst I might have been on one hand frustrated, what can I learn, what can I take out of it and bring back into this season, how do I keep getting better? It starts this Saturday.”

Northampton expect to welcome back all of their four Lions players – Smith, Henry Pollock, Tommy Freeman and Alex Mitchell – to take on the Tigers.

“I am desperate to play well but I am well aware that if you try to pull rabbits out of hats and have the best game of your life it will go the other way,” Smith said.

“I need to stay nice and calm, do my job and hopefully that will lead to me performing well and impressing the powers that be.

Related topics

  • Northampton Saints
  • England Rugby Union
  • Rugby Union

Injured Everton captain Finnigan out until 2026

Getty Images

Everton club captain Megan Finnigan will not return until 2026 because she requires an operation to help repair her anterior cruciate knee ligament (ACL) injury.

The 27-year-old centre-back suffered the knee issue in January and Everton manager Brian Sorensen has confirmed she will not be in contention until after the Women’s Super League (WSL) resumes on 10 January following its winter break.

Finnigan’s news adds to the injury crisis at Everton, with five senior players now out.

Midfielder Katja Snoeijs suffered a hamstring injury in training and will miss Sunday’s home league game against Manchester United, but striker Kelly Gago returns following concussion.

    • 3 hours ago

Women make Hill Dickinson bow

The game against Manchester United will be the first played by the Everton women’s team at the club’s new Hill Dickinson Stadium.

The 52,000-seat arena on Bramley-Moore Dock was opened in the summer and is the regular home of the men’s team.

Everton women have moved into Goodison Park, the previous men’s stadium, but this weekend will play at Hill Dickinson while the Premier League breaks for international fixtures.

A club source told BBC Sport that currently only the lower tier of seating, with a capacity of around 20,000, will be open at Hill Dickinson. However, there is scope to open other areas of the stadium if there is high enough demand for tickets.

The record attendance for an Everton women’s match is 22,161, who attended a WSL game against Merseyside rivals Liverpool at Goodison Park in March 2023.

“I think it is going to be a very good atmosphere. We are going to go out there and put everything on the line,” Sorensen said.

Ellen White, Jen Beattie and Ben Haines

Related topics

  • Football
  • Women’s Football

More on this story

Spurs owners inject £100m into club

Getty Images

Tottenham Hotspur’s majority owners have injected £100m of new capital into the club.

Spurs say the investment will “further strengthen the club’s financial position and equip the club’s leadership team with additional resources to continue the focus on driving long-term sporting success”.

Investment group Enic, which is run by the Lewis Family Trust, owns a majority 86.58% of Tottenham, while the remaining 13.42% is owned by a group of minority investors.

The majority of Enic used to be owned by British businessman Joe Lewis but in 2022 he handed ownership to the Lewis Family Trust and is no longer involved with the club.

The Lewis family have been at the forefront of much hierarchical change at Tottenham over the past few months, and the club statement adds that “this additional capital is part of the Lewis family’s ongoing commitment to the club and its future”.

A source close to the family said: “This is initial additional funding. As the club’s management decides what’s needed to deliver success, more money will be available. The Lewis family is committed to backing the club to be successful.”

Since Levy stepped down there have been three expressions of interest made about taking over Spurs.

The latest was made by American tech entrepreneur Brooklyn Earick, who ruled out making a formal takeover bid after Tottenham insisted the club was not for sale.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Tottenham Hotspur
  • Football

More on this story

    • 15 August
    A graphic of Premier League players from every team in the division in 2025-26 season, with the Premier League trophy in front of them.
    • 16 August
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

Nobel Peace Prize 2025: What are Trump’s credentials, and can he win?

As the Norwegian Nobel Committee prepares to announce this year’s winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, one name, one persona hovers over its decision – the United States president, Donald Trump.

Since stepping into office in January, Trump has made it clear that he believes he should win the coveted prize since he has, he claims, ended at least “seven wars”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

On Wednesday, he put himself in the front seat to claim credit for the possible end to an eighth war, after Israel and Hamas agreed to the first stage of a ceasefire deal that is rooted in Trump’s 20-point peace plan, which he had unveiled last week.

This year’s award announcement also comes amid Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine and conflicts in many other countries.

There are 338 nominees for the prize, and the Nobel Committee — a group of five people selected by the Storting, the Norwegian parliament— picks the winner.

Is Trump qualified to win the prize? Here’s what we know:

Why does Trump say he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize?

Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York in September, Trump said, “Everyone says I should get the Nobel Peace Prize.”

“I ended seven wars. No president or prime minister has ever done anything close to that,” he added.

Trump noted that the wars he ended include Cambodia and Thailand; Kosovo and Serbia; the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda; Pakistan and India; Israel and Iran; Egypt and Ethiopia; and Armenia and Azerbaijan.

What are Trump’s credentials?

Some of the wars Trump claims to have ended are ones he participated in himself. His role in some other ceasefires is disputed. Still, there are other conflicts where the involved parties do credit him with playing a key role as mediator.

  • In September, Trump said he “deserved” to win the prize for the possibility of ending Israel’s two-year-long war on Gaza. While US weapons and the country’s ironclad diplomatic support for Israel have been critical in allowing the war to continue, Trump is also widely believed to have pressured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu more than his predecessor, Joe Biden, to end the fighting. Last week, Trump unveiled his 20-point peace plan. Now, with the announcement of a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, the war is the closest it has been to its conclusion.
  • The war between Iran and Israel in June ended with a ceasefire brokered by Trump. But the bout of fighting, which started with Israel striking Iranian nuclear facilities, killing scientists and bombing residential neighbourhoods, also included the US as an active participant. Trump took part in it by ordering his military to strike three Iranian nuclear sites. Iran struck back by hitting the largest US military base in the Middle East, in Qatar, before the ceasefire was announced.
  • In May, India and Pakistan waged an aerial war, bombing each other’s military bases. India said it also hit “terrorist” bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, while Pakistan claimed India killed dozens of civilians. Ultimately, Trump announced a ceasefire after four days of fighting. But while Pakistan credits the US president for helping halt the fighting, India insists he had no role.
  • Cambodia and Thailand saw five days of hostilities in August, and a truce began after phone calls from not only Trump, but also mediation from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and a delegation of Chinese negotiators. So far, only Cambodia has thanked Trump for his role.
  • Relations between Serbia and Kosovo have been tense since the early 2000s. The European Union and NATO have always been key mediators in this region. Kosovo and Serbia signed a deal in 2020 under Trump during his first term. While relations remain tense, the two have not been involved in a full-blown war since Trump’s return to power.
  • Trump says he ended a war between Egypt and Ethiopia. But while the two nations have had tense relations, especially over a hydroelectric dam which opened on a tributary of the Nile River, they have not been in any war.
  • Rwanda and the DRC signed a peace deal in June, brokered by Trump. The ceasefire is fragile and tensions between the two countries remain high, but the deal is holding for now.
  • In August, Trump oversaw a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, which promises to end a simmering conflict that often exploded into open war since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. But in a subsequent interview with Fox & Friends, Trump appeared confused about the countries he had mediated between. He told his hosts that he had ended a war between Azerbaijan and Albania.

“I would be surprised if President Trump will be awarded this year’s peace prize as he has not yet made a substantial enough contribution to peace to win the prize,” Nina Graeger, director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo, told Al Jazeera.

“While he deserves credit for his efforts to end the war in Gaza, it is too early to tell whether the peace proposal will be implemented and lead to lasting peace,” she said.

Why does Trump want the Nobel Prize?

Trump says he deserves it — and many of his supporters agree. But the US president has also often compared his foreign policy initiatives with the global recognition that former US President Barack Obama received during his stint in power.

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” — even though he had been in power for only a few months at that point. Obama’s win has long been criticised, given his role in expanding the use of drone attacks overseas, including against US citizens, and his continuation of multiple wars around the world.

“If I were named Obama, I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,” Trump said last year.

According to Norwegian newspaper Dagens Naeringsliv, in July, Trump also called Norway’s Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg — the former NATO chief — to discuss tariffs and lobby for the Nobel Peace Prize.

But hasn’t Trump also been an aggressor?

Graeger said when it comes to selecting a winner, the Nobel Committee may want to look at the sum of a candidate’s efforts towards peace.

“Trump’s retreat from international institutions, wish to take over Greenland from the Kingdom of Denmark, a NATO ally, as well as infringements on basic democratic rights within his own country, do not align well with the will of Alfred Nobel,” she said.

Besides participating in bombing Iran together with Israel in June, Trump also ordered US forces to attack Somalia in February, claiming he was targeting senior ISIL (ISIS) leadership in that country.

In March, he launched large-scale strikes on Yemen’s Houthis over the group’s Red Sea attacks, and in September, he ordered US forces to strike boats in the Caribbean, including at least three originating from Venezuela, claiming they were ferrying drug smugglers and narcotics to the US.

The US president has also threatened to annex Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal.

Is violence a no-no for Nobel Peace Prize winners?

The Nobel Peace Prize, established under the will of Sweden’s Alfred Nobel, is given to “the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses”.

But in reality, the prize is shrouded in controversy.

In 1973, US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was one of its winners, for negotiating a ceasefire and ending the US’s Vietnam War. But Kissinger had wrecked earlier ceasefire efforts, prolonging the war. The carpet bombing campaign he oversaw in Cambodia under President Richard Nixon killed hundreds of thousands of people. Nixon also backed Pakistan’s massacres in present-day Bangladesh as the latter’s independence movement reached its crescendo in 1971. Kissinger and Nixon also funnelled millions of dollars into enabling a military coup against the democratically elected president of Chile, Salvador Allende. And after he won the Nobel, Kissinger in 1975 also greenlit Indonesian President Soeharto’s invasion of East Timor. Soeharto was a critical Cold War ally of the US.

In 1994, then-Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres won the Nobel alongside his Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and then-Palestinian President Yasser Arafat for the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accords. Peres had been prime minister previously, would become PM again in 1995, and was later also Israel’s president.

But four decades earlier, as deputy director general of Israel’s Defence Ministry, Peres had helped plan the Suez War. During his premiership in the 1980s, Israel also launched a long-range missile attack on the office of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) in Tunisia.

Myanmar’s pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi won the prize in 1991. But decades later, calls grew for the award to be withdrawn over her role overseeing massacres against the Rohingya, when she was the country’s de facto leader between 2016 and 2021.

And then there is Obama. “When Barack Obama received the prize in 2009, critics argued that it was premature, as he had been in office for less than a year and had not yet shown concrete results in promoting peace,” Graeger said.

“When awarding the prize to Obama, they emphasised his visions regarding the importance of multilateral diplomacy and disarmament, and one could argue that he represented a reset of international relations and cooperation,” she added.

All of these choices, Graeger said, do shed light on the boundaries the Nobel Committee is willing to push in choosing the winner of the prize.

“While the Nobel Committee does not set out to cause controversy, they do not shy away from it if they feel they have a laureate who is deserving of the Prize,” she said.

So can Trump still win — and who has endorsed him?

Nominations for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize closed on January 31, just days after Trump returned to the White House.

In July, Netanyahu said he nominated Trump for the prize, followed by Cambodia’s Prime Minister Hun Manet in August. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev also jointly endorsed Trump for the prize in August.

Within the president’s cabinet, Steve Witkoff, his chief envoy to the Middle East, has said Trump was “the single finest candidate” for the prize. US Representative Buddy Carter, a Republican, also sent a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee in September. US pharmaceutical company Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, also said Trump deserves the prize.

But nominations made after July 31 will count for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, according to the rules of the Nobel Committee. The government of Pakistan has already nominated Trump for the prize for next year.

Al Jazeera asked the Norwegian organisers of the prize whether Trump’s candidacy was under consideration, but there has been no response as yet.

What could happen if Trump does not win?

Speaking at a US military meeting in Virginia in September, Trump said it would be “a big insult to America” if he were not given the award.

“They’ll give it to some guy that didn’t do a damn thing … they’ll give it to the guy who wrote a book about the mind of Donald Trump,” he said.

Within Norway, questions have arisen over how Trump might respond if he does not win. The US has already imposed 15 percent tariffs on the country’s exports.

The Trump administration also told CNBC last month that the US is “very troubled” after Norway — which has an approximately $2 trillion sovereign fund — announced it would divest from US company Caterpillar over its links to Israel’s war on Gaza.

But in an interview with Bloomberg on October 3, Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eid said Norway’s government is not involved in the Nobel Peace Prize decisions.

Copy Molly-Mae’s £60 slippers this autumn with ‘so comfortable’ £20 alternative

It’s no secret Molly-Mae has been eagerly waiting for the start of autumn as she gets cosy with her £60 slippers – but we’ve found the perfect alternatives that won’t break the bank

Molly-Mae Hague has been keenly sharing with fans that she’s excited to welcome in the autumn season. And now that the colder temperatures and darker evenings have properly arrived, Molly-Mae’s shared with fans her go-to cosy slippers for the chillier months, revealing she has multiple pairs.

Though the Borg Corkbed Loafer Slipper has captured Molly-Mae’s heart, not all of us can afford to splash out £60 on a pair of slippers to see us through the autumn – that’s why we’ve found the perfect comfy alternatives with a more affordable price tag of £19.99.

READ MORE: Claudia Winkleman’s exact The Traitor’s waterproof boots are a must-have for autumn styling

READ MORE: ‘Spicy and sexy’ fragrance is the only scent Claudia Winkleman wears—and it’s on sale

The White Company’s Borg Slippers, which Molly-Mae adores, are described as coming in a stylish loafer design that looks smart and contemporary with any loungewear or nightwear. This slipper is made with borg, a fleecy material similar to faux sheepskin, ensuring ultimate comfort with every wear. Plus, the sturdy cork soles mean they are durable enough to take outside, too, so you can keep your cosy slippers on while you wander around the house or run errands out and about.

That said, these slippers retail for £60, making them an expensive addition to your loungewear collection.

Meanwhile, this pair of Cosy Alpine Shearling Memory Foam Slippers could be just the ticket for emulating Molly-Mae’s comfy vibes without breaking the bank. Available in a range of shades, including a neutral sand shade akin to Molly-Mae’s go-to slipper, these shoes cost a much more budget-friendly £19.99.

These slippers feature a wool-like upper and a skin-friendly lining for a premium feel, without the premium price tag. Described as making your feet feel like they’re stepping on a warm velvety carpet, anywhere, anytime, these slippers offer a cute style that’s sure to match well with the cosy atmosphere of your home.

Offering a lightweight and breathable design, these slip-on slippers are super convenient for you to put on or take off at a second’s notice. Your feet can breathe freely in them, and even if you sweat a lot, these slippers can quickly dry your feet to keep them comfortable.

Featuring an anti-skid sole, these slippers are designed to provide excellent grip and are built to last, making them suitable for a wide range of indoor and outdoor activities. The high-density 80D memory foam provides ample cushioning for each step, helping to relieve muscle tension.

These cosy slippers currently boast an impressive 5.3k reviews on Amazon, with a whopping 75% bestowing 5 out of 5-star ratings.

One thrilled shopper shares: “So comfortable. Get out of bed, slip them on, and walk with ease. Fit so well, no slipping or sliding. With these, I’m sure they will last well, and washing is no problem. Comfort and support, and so light, you hardly know they’re there.”

Another buyer beams: “Lovely slippers, so soft and comfortable.”

A third chimes in: “Perfect fit, so so cosy, comfy, feels like I am walking with a pillow attached to my feet. I ordered one size up, just in case, as I prefer to have plenty of room, and it is perfect. Very happy with my purchase.”

And a fourth adds: “These slippers are really comfortable, the best ones I have bought so far.”

Article continues below

For similar alternatives to Molly-Mae’s £60 pair, that won’t cost a fortune, check out ASOS’ offering with these Loungeable cosy borg mule slipper in cream (£16), or head over to New Look where there’s a pair of Loungeable Cream Fluffy Mule Slippers for the same £16.

Nigeria Loses $3.3bn To Oil Theft, Sabotage, Oil Firms Withold N1. 5trn Revenue —NEITI

The Federal Government lost a total of 13.5 million barrels worth $3.3 bn to oil theft and pipeline sabotage between 2023 and 2024.

This was revealed by the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), Ogbonanya Orji, at the 2025 Association of Energy Correspondents of Nigeria (NAEC) conference in Lagos on Thursday.

NEITI Executive Secretary, Dr Ogbonnaya Orji speaks during a press conference in Abuja on September 28, 2021.

While speaking to this year’s theme, ‘Nigeria’s Energy Future: Exploring Opportunities and Addressing Risks for Sustainable Growth,’  Orji noted that the lost revenue could have financed a full year of the federal health budget or provided energy access to millions of households.

“These losses are not just economic—they represent broken trust, institutional weaknesses, and missed opportunities for national progress. This is precisely why transparency and accountability are not optional. They are existential.”

According to him, Nigeria’s energy future will not be defined by the size of its reserves or production capacity, but by how transparently and prudently it is able to manage its natural resource wealth—the revenues, data, contracts, and decisions that shape its national destiny.

He said the era of secrecy in resource governance was over.

“The global energy transition towards cleaner fuels, gas optimisation, and renewable energy requires openness, responsibility, and innovation at every stage of the value chain.

“At NEITI, our philosophy is clear and uncompromising:

“Data builds trust, and trust drives investment.”

“Transparency is not a bureaucratic exercise—it is an economic imperative. It attracts capital, technology, and partnerships. Our latest NEITI industry reports make this truth evident.”

The NEITI boss also revealed that its 2021–2022 Oil and Gas Industry Reports revealed that Nigeria earned $23.04 billion in 2021 and $23.05 billion in 2022 from the sector.

READ ALSO:  Oil Bid: Ensure Full Disclosure Of Beneficial Ownership,’ NEITI Urges NUPRC

However, it identified outstanding remittances of ₦1.5 trillion owed to the Federation by some companies and government agencies—funds that could significantly support energy infrastructure, education, and healthcare if recovered.

“Over the past decade, NEITI has evolved from an auditing agency to a governance reform institution.

“We have institutionalised regular audits of oil, gas, and solid mineral sectors, tracking production, payments, and remediation; developed Nigeria’s Beneficial Ownership Register, unmasking the true owners of over 4,800 extractive assets, and helping the government combat corruption and illicit financial flows; and launched the NEITI Data Centre—a national open-data infrastructure that provides real-time public access to industry information.

We have also strengthened partnerships with NUPRC, NMDPRA, and NCDMB to promote transparency in licensing, metering, and host community trust management and introduced the Just Energy Transition and Climate Accountability Framework to ensure that Nigeria’s shift to cleaner energy is transparent, inclusive, and fair.

“These are not ceremonial milestones. They are practical governance instruments designed to make transparency the DNA of Nigeria’s extractive sector.”

As Nigeria positions gas as its transition fuel and renewable energy as its future, Orji advised the government to keep pace with innovation.

“Our energy future must rest on verifiable data, open contracts, measurable emissions, and accountable institutions.

“NEITI envisions a sector where every dollar is traceable, every contract is public, every decision is transparent, and every Nigerian citizen can see how natural resources translate into national prosperity.