Beyoncé London tickets: How to get Tottenham Hotspur Stadium seats for £50

Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in London for its UK shows and there’s still a chance for fans to get tickets to see the singer at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium

Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in London(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

The Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in the UK ahead of Beyoncé taking to the stage at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium this week. The Texas Hold ‘Em singer will be launching her latest world tour in London later this evening.

The gigs represent her debut, and only, performances in the UK on the global tour. She’s staging six gigs in the capital, all of which are happening at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

Tickets for these concerts were made available earlier this year, with many reportedly selling out. However, there’s still an opportunity to get a ticket. Some tickets are up on resale websites for around £50 each, as reported by Essex Live. There are also more up for around £70 upwards each.

How to buy cheap Beyoncé tickets now

Beyoncé in a black bodysuit, boots and gloves, holding a microphone as she performs on a stage.
Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour will launch in London later tonight(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

Beyoncé tickets can still be secured via several online resale platforms. This includes the likes of viagogo, Vivid Seats and StubHub. At the time of writing, some tickets on viagogo, for example, are up for around £50 each – including tickets for the June 5 show tonight priced at £49 each.

Given that the face value of Beyoncé tickets was approximately £80-100 each, this is considered a significant saving for fans. But if that date doesn’t suit you, there are alternatives.

Currently, tickets are available for the star’s June concerts for other dates and on other platforms from £70 each. And we’ve compiled the list of cheapest pairs of tickets from those three resale sites below:

  • June 05, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £49 each
  • June 07, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £78 each
  • June 10, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £81 each
  • June 12, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £70 each
  • June 14, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £93 each
  • June 16, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £84

Fans may wish to do their own research into resale tickets. Here are the links:

Beyoncé on stage in a silver bodysuit and matching boots, holding a microphone, on the Renaissance World Tour.
The singer will take to the stage at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

Yet, fans looking to secure tickets for Beyoncé’s forthcoming shows at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London have more than just resale websites to explore. Seat Unique is offering official tickets, as reported by Essex Live.

Seat Unique boasts a selection of VIP and hospitality tickets currently available. These come with extras like early access, after parties, premium seating, box views and more.

Here’s the link:

Article continues below

Beyoncé London tickets: How to get Tottenham Hotspur Stadium seats for £50

Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in London for its UK shows and there’s still a chance for fans to get tickets to see the singer at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium

Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in London(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

The Cowboy Carter tour has arrived in the UK ahead of Beyoncé taking to the stage at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium this week. The Texas Hold ‘Em singer will be launching her latest world tour in London later this evening.

The gigs represent her debut, and only, performances in the UK on the global tour. She’s staging six gigs in the capital, all of which are happening at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

Tickets for these concerts were made available earlier this year, with many reportedly selling out. However, there’s still an opportunity to get a ticket. Some tickets are up on resale websites for around £50 each, as reported by Essex Live. There are also more up for around £70 upwards each.

How to buy cheap Beyoncé tickets now

Beyoncé in a black bodysuit, boots and gloves, holding a microphone as she performs on a stage.
Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour will launch in London later tonight(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

Beyoncé tickets can still be secured via several online resale platforms. This includes the likes of viagogo, Vivid Seats and StubHub. At the time of writing, some tickets on viagogo, for example, are up for around £50 each – including tickets for the June 5 show tonight priced at £49 each.

Given that the face value of Beyoncé tickets was approximately £80-100 each, this is considered a significant saving for fans. But if that date doesn’t suit you, there are alternatives.

Currently, tickets are available for the star’s June concerts for other dates and on other platforms from £70 each. And we’ve compiled the list of cheapest pairs of tickets from those three resale sites below:

  • June 05, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £49 each
  • June 07, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £78 each
  • June 10, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £81 each
  • June 12, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £70 each
  • June 14, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £93 each
  • June 16, 2025 – London, UK – Tottenham Hotspur Stadium – £84

Fans may wish to do their own research into resale tickets. Here are the links:

Beyoncé on stage in a silver bodysuit and matching boots, holding a microphone, on the Renaissance World Tour.
The singer will take to the stage at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium(Image: Kevin Mazur/WireImage for Parkwood)

Yet, fans looking to secure tickets for Beyoncé’s forthcoming shows at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London have more than just resale websites to explore. Seat Unique is offering official tickets, as reported by Essex Live.

Seat Unique boasts a selection of VIP and hospitality tickets currently available. These come with extras like early access, after parties, premium seating, box views and more.

Here’s the link:

Article continues below

Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs over the next two years

Procter & Gamble has said it will cut six percent of its workforce, or 7,000 jobs, over the next two years as it undertakes a restructuring programme as tariffs raise costs and uncertainty for businesses and consumers.

The world’s largest consumer goods company, which makes products ranging from Tide detergent to Pampers diapers, announced the job cuts on Thursday at a Deutsche Bank’s Consumer Conference in Paris.

The Cincinnati, Ohio-based consumer goods giant also plans to exit some product categories and brands in certain markets, including some potential divestitures, as part of the broader two-year restructuring plan.

The restructuring will help simplify the organisational structure by “making roles broader” and “teams smaller”, P&G said.

“The two-year window … gives them some flexibility in terms of timing and depth of cuts, as the tariff situation is very fluid,” said Christian Greiner, senior portfolio manager at F/m Investments that owns shares in P&G.

The company had about 108,000 employees as of June 2024. The job cuts would account for roughly 15 percent of its non-manufacturing workforce.

P&G expects to record charges of $1bn to $1.6bn before tax over the two-year period, with a quarter of the charges expected to be non-cash.

Geopolitical uncertainty drives shift 

Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten and operations head Shailesh Jejurikar, speaking at the Deutsche Bank conference, said that the geopolitical environment was “unpredictable” and that consumers were facing “greater uncertainty.”

In April, P&G said it would raise prices on some products, and Schulten said it was prepared to “pull every lever” in its arsenal to mitigate the impact of tariffs, primarily through higher prices and cost-cutting.

The Pampers maker imports raw ingredients, packaging materials and some finished products into the United States from China. About 90 percent of what it sells is produced domestically, P&G has said.

President Donald Trump’s sweeping levies on trading partners have shaken global markets and sparked concerns of a recession in the US.

P&G on Thursday estimated it would have about a $600m before-tax hit in its fiscal year 2026, based on current tariff rates, a number that has frequently shifted.

Overall, the trade war has cost companies at least $34bn in lost sales and higher costs, a Reuters analysis showed.

It is also affecting US consumer sentiment, which fell slightly in May for the fifth straight month, surprising economists. The preliminary reading of the University of Michigan’s closely watched consumer sentiment index declined 2.7 percent on a monthly basis to 50.8, the second-lowest level in the nearly 75-year history of the survey. The only lower reading was in June 2022. Since January, sentiment has tumbled nearly 30 percent.

Why did the US block a resolution demanding an end to Israel’s war on Gaza?

Outrage after US vetoes UN Security Council motion calling for permanent ceasefire in Gaza. &nbsp,

The United States has blocked another United Nations Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza.

It’s the fifth time Washington has used its veto power since Israel’s war began in October 2023.

The US says it will continue to support its close ally while Israel says it will continue the war in Gaza until Hamas is defeated.

So do the veto powers of the permanent Security Council members undermine the body itself?

Even when resolutions are passed, does the UN have the capability to enact them?

Presenter:

Mohammed Jamjoom

Guests:

Stephen Zunes – professor of politics at the University of San Francisco

Luigi Daniele – associate professor of international law at Molise University in Italy

Supreme Court strikes down Mexico’s lawsuit against US gun manufacturers

A lawsuit brought by the Mexican government was turned down by the US Supreme Court, alleging that Smith &amp and Wesson failed to stop the sale of illegal firearms to cartels and organized crime.

The Supreme Court of Justice ruled in one of the numerous decisions on Thursday that the Protection of Legal Commerce in Arms Act protected the manufacturers of firearms from Mexico’s lawsuit.

The court reached an unanimous decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the nine-member bench, arguing that even “indifference” to the trafficking of firearms does not constitute willfully supporting a criminal enterprise.

The defendant manufacturers “did not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and assisted” Mexican gun dealers in their illegal sales to Mexican traffickers,” Kagan wrote (PDF).

“Some such sales take place, as the complaint claims, and the manufacturers are aware of this,” the complaint claims. Mexico hasn’t, however, adequately argued that it should “participate in” those sales.

She continued, “the complaint from the Mexican government does not specifically identify any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,” as most aiding-and-abetting claims do.”

A complaint was filed in a federal court in Boston, Massachusetts in August 2021. The Mexican government, which was then led by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, claimed that the country’s sheer volume of illegal firearms was evidence of negligence on the part of gun manufacturers in that initial complaint.

According to the report, those weapons had wrought a devastating impact on Mexican society. The United Nations estimates that for every 100 000 people killed intentionally in the country in 2023, there will be nearly 25 of those deaths. This is one of the highest homicide rates in the world.

Cartels and other criminal organizations that are active in Mexico have contributed to a large portion of that crime. According to the Igarape Institute, a think tank based in Brazil, Mexico’s crime cost the nation nearly 1.92 percent of its GDP between 2010 and 2014, according to estimates from the Igarape Institute.

The US manufactures the most weapons in the world and has the biggest stock of firearms that isn’t sourced elsewhere.

For instance, the “iron river” refers to the stream of firearms that enters Mexico and the rest of Latin America. According to the Department of Justice, nearly 70% of the illegal weapons seized in Mexico between 2014 and 2018 were sourced from the US.

Countries like Mexico have since called on the US to take action to reduce the volume of firearm traffic in other countries.

In its lawsuit, Mexico targeted some of the biggest names in US gun production, including Smith &amp and Wesson as well as businesses like Beretta USA, Glock Inc., and Colt’s Manufacturing LLC.

The gun manufacturers argued that they could not be held accountable for criminal behavior in another country, so they fought back against the lawsuit.

Some of Mexico’s arguments were questioned by the Supreme Court, including the notion that the gun manufacturers had created and sold their goods specifically for cartel buyers.

Although Mexico focuses on producing “military style” assault weapons, regular people in the country can purchase these items legally. Because Mexican cartel members also favor these weapons, manufacturers cannot be held accountable for supporting criminal activity, according to Justice Kagan.

She continued, “The same applies to firearms that have names or symbols in Spanish that reference Mexican history.” They may appeal to “millions of law-abiding Hispanic Americans,” the cartels claim.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a trade association for the industry, praised the Supreme Court’s decision as a “tremendous victory” in the fight against unfair charges on Thursday. In support of the defendants in the case, it had filed an amicus brief.

Gun control activists have been trying for too long to demonize the highly regulated U.S. firearms industry through violent organized crime, both domestically and internationally, according to the group’s senior vice president, Lawrence G. Keane.

Keane added that he and other members of the firearms industry were “sympathetic to the plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence committed by narco-terrorist drug cartels.”

How can Man Utd afford Mbeumo deal?

Getty Images
  • 315 Comments

Manchester United may have no European football to look forward to next season but it has not prevented them from delving into the transfer market.

A £62.5m deal was agreed to sign Brazil forward Matheus Cunha from Wolves on the opening day of the latest transfer window, which is split into two phases this summer.

United are now also are in pursuit of Brentford striker Bryan Mbeumo after submitting a bid of £45m and £10m in add-ons for the Cameroon international.

However, this activity is set against the backdrop of part owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe delivering a dire assement of the club’s finances in March and the subsequent ramifications of their Europa League final defeat to Tottenham.

That denied the 20-time English champions a Champions League spot and a guaranteed £70m just for participating in Europe’s elite club competition.

Since then captain Bruno Fernandes has also rejected the overtures of Saudi Pro-League club Al-Hilal, which may have generated a transfer fee of between £80-100m.

And given United ended up 15th in the Premier League last term, and boss Ruben Amorim is wedded to a 3-4-3 formation that is not suited to those at his disposal, the club’s need for new blood seems greater than ever before.

But just how can they afford it without breaching profit and sustainability rules (PSR) which limit clubs to losses of £105m over three years?

United have significant headroom to do deals

The noises coming out of Old Trafford from Amorim and his players felt despondent and defeatist in the immediate aftermath of United’s failure to reach the Champions League.

Defender Luke Shaw described a club at “rock bottom”, while the former Sporting boss questioned his own future in Manchester.

There were suggestions transfer moves would be downgraded from a Plan A to less expensive alternatives, all while news of a new wave of redundancies to cut costs filtered through.

Gallows humour pervaded in the stands prior to United’s final Premier League game of a dismal 2024-25 campaign against Aston Villa – especially when talk turned to their prospects for next year.

Yet, for Maguire, talk of a financial crisis and a club struggling to meet PSR obligations is well wide of the mark.

“Even without European football they]United] could spend £150m without breaking into a sweat”, Maguire told BBC Sport.

“The picture that has been painted of Manchester United’s finances has exaggerated the negativity. They make more cash on a day-to-day basis than any other club in the Premier League.

” The club does not lose as much money as is claimed and their position is far better than everybody is looking at because everybody is looking at the wrong company.

“Everybody is looking at the New York company – Manchester United plc but there is another company called Red Football which is owned by the Glazers and that is forming the basis of the PSR calculation.

Academy graduate sales make PSR sense

On the face of it, deals for former Atletic Madrid player Cunha and potentially Mbeumo would total over £100m and eat into a significant chunk of United’s summer budget before sales.

However, accounting practices mean that is not actually the case.

” When you bring in a new player you would normally put them on a four or five-year contract. The way the accounting works – you take the cost of the player and divide it by the length of the contract, “added Maguire.

” If you sign someone for £150m it would cost them £30m next year plus the wages.

“But you only have to go and sell a couple of players of the calibre of]Alejandro] Garnacho,]Marcus] Rashford and co to get more than £60m of profit coming in so it effectively pays for itself.

” So you can pay out a far bigger multiple than the sales proceeds of those that might be departing. “

The likes of Tyrell Malacia, Jadon Sancho, Rashford, Garnacho and Antony have all been tipped to depart permanently this summer.

In addition there has also been speculation over the future of goalkeepers Andre Onana and Altay Bayindir and 20-year-old midfielder Kobbie Mainoo, who almost 12 months ago was in the England starting XI for the final of the European Championship.

” If a football club sells a player, normally the profit which goes into your PSR calculations is the difference between the sales price and the book value. Without getting too technical the book value is how much you originally pay for the player less how much you have written off to date.

“With an academy player you have not paid anything for the player’s registration so if we look at other clubs and Chelsea in particular, the sales of Conor Gallagher, Fikayo Tomori, Tammy Abraham, Billy Gilmour and Mason Mount – they all came through the academy and when you sell them it is 100% profit.

” In the case of Manchester United they have three players]Rashford, Garnacho and Mainoo] who have been mentioned in media outlets as being possibly for sale and they are going to generate pure profit.

Related topics

  • Manchester United
  • Football