Climate study finds overheating world will add 57 superhot days a year

A new study by World Weather Attribution and United States-based Climate Central has calculated the increase in dangerous “superhot days” – defined as warmer than 90 percent of comparable days between 1991 and 2020 – due to climate change.

The report, which is not yet peer-reviewed but uses established techniques for climate attribution, was released on Thursday. It highlights the significant effect of the Paris Climate Agreement.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Before the 2015 accord, the world was on track for a catastrophic 4C (7.2F) of warming by the end of the century, which would have resulted in an additional 114 superhot days per year.

By fulfilling current commitments to curb emissions, the world is now heading towards 2.6C (4.7F) of warming. Under this scenario, the Earth will still add 57 superhot days annually by 2100 – nearly two months of dangerously high temperatures – but this is half the increase of the worst-case scenario. Since 2015, the world has already added 11 superhot days on average.

Potsdam Climate Institute Director Johan Rockstrom, who was not part of the research team, said people should not be relieved that we are no longer on the 4-degree warming pre-Paris trajectory because the current track “would still imply a disastrous future for billions of humans on Earth”.

The report does not say how many people will be affected by the additional dangerously hot days, but coauthor Friederike Otto of Imperial College London said “it will definitely be tens of thousands or millions, not less”. She noted that thousands die in heatwaves each year already.

The study also underscores the profound unfairness of the impact of climate change across the world, showing a massive disconnect between carbon pollution and expected heat exposure.

The 10 countries that will experience the biggest increase in dangerous heat days are almost all small, ocean-dependent nations like Panama, the Solomon Islands, and Samoa. These countries are expected to see the largest spikes, with Panama projected to face 149 extra superhot days a year. These 10 nations collectively produce only 1 percent of global heat-trapping gases.

In stark contrast, the top carbon-polluting countries – the United States, China, and India – are predicted to get only between 23 and 30 extra superhot days. Despite being responsible for 42 percent of the world’s carbon dioxide, they will face less than 1 percent of the additional superhot days.

Meghan Markle breaks silence on Netflix ‘downgrade’ and compares herself to Obamas

Following reports that Prince Harry and Meghan’s deal with streaming giant Netflix has been ‘downgraded’, the Duchess has revealed the real state of affairs during a sit-down

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, has finally addressed her Netflix deal in a candid sit-down chat.

It’s been a packed few weeks for the former royal, who popped up at the Balenciaga show during Paris Fashion Week before receiving an award alongside her husband, Prince Harry. However, her most recent outing saw her dive into a series of topics, including the changing deal terms with streaming giant Netflix, which the couple has worked with since 2020, when they stepped back as working royals.

The multi-year deal was one of a series of high-profile business ventures that they created as they began to fund their own lifestyle.

It was reported at the time to be worth £75 million, and their offerings for the streaming giant included their self-titled documentary series, which covered their love story and royal exit, Meghan’s lifestyle show, With Love, Meghan, and Polo – a documentary series looking at the world of the elite sport and the lives of some players.

Not all of Meghan and Harry’s productions with Netflix have been well received, with even their bombshell documentary that broke viewing records accused by some critics of retreading old ground.

This year, it was announced that the couple had signed a new, more flexible deal with Netflix, which gave the company a ‘first look’ option on any of the couple’s ideas, with the Sussexes then able to take these elsewhere if the streaming giant passed on them. This was, by many critics and commentators, seen as something of a “downgrade” by one PR expert, after some of the lacklustre offerings from Harry and Meghan had struggled to appeal to a wide audience or receive rave reviews across the board.

However, during a sit-down with Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit 2025, Meghan explained to Alyson Shontell, Editor-in-Chief and Chief Content Officer for Fortune, the details of the couple’s ongoing working relationship with Netflix, providing a more positive outlook than some had assumed.

“My husband and I were in an overall deal with Netflix, and then not just similar to Higher Ground in the Obamas’ deal, once that had come to its term, the extension of it, which was such an incredible sign of the strength of our partnership, was now being in a first-look deal,” Meghan explained.

“Which is also exciting, because it gives us flexibility to go to our partners first, and then at the same time, to be able to shop content that might not be the right fit for Netflix, but has a home somewhere else.”

The Duchess also said she was “grateful” for the “creative partnership” she has with Netflix, who work with her in conjunction on her As Ever lifestyle brand.

Article continues below

Despite Meghan’s positivity about the new chapter with the streaming platform, PR expert Mark Borkowski previously said he believed the first-look deal to be a “downgrade” for the couple, explaining that Netflix had, in his view, “done a very neat job of pivoting away from two very expensive people who didn’t deliver”.

Meghan and Harry also inked major deals with Penguin Random House – which published Harry’s bombshell memoir Spare – and Spotify back in 2020, the latter of which was estimated to be worth £18 million.

A week after the floods, central Mexico still reels from the devastation

The stench of decay extends miles beyond Poza Rica in one of the regions most devastated by last week’s torrential rains that inundated central and eastern Mexico.

By Wednesday, the official death toll had reached 66, with the number of missing people increasing to 75. Nearly 200 communities remain isolated — predominantly in Hidalgo’s central mountainous region, where persistent cloud cover has hindered helicopter access.

A persistent dust cloud hangs over the main avenue of Poza Rica, a gulf-adjacent oil-producing city, where soldiers laboured continuously. To the east, near the overflowed Cazones River, numerous streets remained submerged under 3 feet (about 1 metre) of water and mud, covered by an additional 6 feet of accumulated rubbish, furniture, and debris.

“A week later, this looks horrible — worse. You can’t even cross the street,” lamented Ana Luz Saucedo, who escaped with her children when water rushed in “like the sea”.

She now fears disease because a decomposing body near her home remains uncollected. “The dead body has already started to rot, and no one has come for him.”

The impact of last week’s catastrophic rains, floods, and landslides continues to unfold as Mexico’s government proceeds with rescue and recovery operations.

Officials attribute the disaster to multiple converging weather systems — two tropical systems colliding with warm and cold fronts — arriving as an unusually intense rainy season concluded, leaving saturated rivers and unstable hillsides.

Residents like Saucedo believe warnings were insufficient, particularly in Poza Rica.

“Many people died because they didn’t give notice — really, they didn’t warn us,” she said. “They came only when the river was already overflowing … not before, so people could evacuate.”

President Claudia Sheinbaum explained that alert systems for such events differ from hurricane warnings. She acknowledged the need to review river maintenance and emergency protocols after the crisis to determine “what worked, what we need to improve and whether there are better alert mechanisms”.

Military, naval, and civilian emergency teams continue operating across affected states, supplemented by hundreds of volunteers.

In Poza Rica, women from Veracruz distributed clothing and 1,000 pots of homemade tamales to flood victims.

‘Shout out to my ex’ – why clubs are turning to former bosses

Getty Images/Rex Features

It’s not just long throw-ins and going direct from the goalkeeper that have regained popularity in English football this season.

From an absence of a whopping 23 years to one of just 89 days – and plenty in between – reappointing former managers is in vogue across the top four tiers.

Of the seven clubs to change boss this season, three have brought back someone who had previously been in their dugout.

In total, at time of writing on 15 October, 11 of the 92 Premier League or Football League teams are managed by someone in their second (or more) spell at the helm.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

So, why go back? For some it’s a case of heart over head.

Steve Cotterill returned to hometown club Cheltenham Town after 23 years last month.

The 61-year-old, who led the club into the Football League in 1999 and returned with them bottom of League Two, said the Robins “will always be in my heart”.

“I would know most weeks within an hour of the game ending, wherever I’ve been, how have Cheltenham got on, who’s their team – that hasn’t ever left me,” he told BBC Radio Gloucestershire.

“When I’m not working, I’ve been down to watch games.”

If Cotterill’s return after more than two decades away evokes the feeling of a fairytale, then Chris Wilder’s third coming at Sheffield United feels more like the correcting of a mistake.

Wilder led his hometown club from League One into the Premier League in his first spell between 2016 and 2021 and then guided them to 90 points, and the Championship play-off final, last season in his second stint.

He was then surprisingly sacked and replaced by Ruben Selles in June, only for the Spaniard to lose all six of his games in charge and Wilder to be brought back in September.

When asked by BBC Radio Sheffield if he would have said ‘no’ if it had been “any other football club”, he said: “Possibly yeah. This is a special and unique club for me.”

The Blades welcome Watford on Saturday, with the Hornets back under the management of Javi Gracia for the first time since he replaced Paulo Pezzolano last week.

Familiarity breeds… content?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Jobi McAnuff made more than 700 appearances across his lengthy playing career and believes many re-appointments are based on the hope of rekindling an old spark.

“I think particularly when managers have done well and had success… We talk a lot about the unknown and there’s a fear of that,” the former Reading and Watford midfielder said on the BBC’s EFL podcast 72+.

“There’s a lot of positivity about Gracia and Wilder going back.

“I suppose it’s that familiarity, bit of confidence in someone who has done a good job beforehand and maybe getting the fans onside.”

Former Huddersfield and Middlesbrough full-back Tommy Smith pointed to the recent situation at Sheffield United of a case where clubs sack a manager believing the “grass can be greener”.

“I think sometimes it’s a case of not knowing what you’ve got until it’s gone,” Smith said.

“Certainly in the Sheffield United case they tried to go down a different route with Selles and it didn’t work out.

The gaffers replaying the hits

Everton boss David Moyes celebrates after a winGetty Images

If you’re getting invited back, then odds are you made a decent impression first time around.

Struggling at the bottom end of the Premier League, Everton turned to David Moyes in January, almost 12 years after he left Goodison for Manchester United.

Moyes had taken Everton into the Champions League in his initial 10-year spell on Merseyside and led them to safety with something to spare last season, while they have made a solid start this time around.

Grant McCann took Doncaster Rovers into the League One play-offs in his first spell and then, having returned in May 2023 after four years away, won the League Two title.

Paul Cook led Chesterfield from League Two into the League One play-offs in his first stint and then guided them to the National League title after returning in February 2022, while Darrell Clarke took Bristol Rovers from the fifth tier to the third in his first spell.

Scott Lindsey steered Crawley to a surprise promotion to League One in May 2024, left for MK Dons in September and was then back with the Red Devils by March of this year as they dropped back down.

Neil Harris’ first spell at Cambridge was short and sweet, leaving after just 14 matches to have a second go (yep, another return) as Millwall boss in February 2024.

Revell’s radical return

Alex Revell’s return at Stevenage is proof that sometimes sequels are better than the original.

He was appointed Boro boss in February 2020 but sacked in November 2021 after a difficult 21 months in League Two.

The former striker came back on to the club’s coaching staff under Steve Evans – and when Evans left to return to Rotherham in May 2024, Revell was given another shot at the main gig.

After a steady 14th-placed finish last season, Stevenage lead the way in League One after 10 games, as they aim to achieve a first-ever promotion to the second tier.

“Going back, you want to show people what you’ve got,” McAnuff said.

Curtain coming down on Ferguson’s fourth act?

Peterborough boss Darren FergusonRex Features

From the top of League One we go down to the bottom and a man in his FOURTH spell in charge of a team… for now anyway.

Darren Ferguson first took over at Peterborough in January 2007 and spearheaded them to back-to-back promotions to the Championship.

He left for Preston in November 2009 but returned to Cambridgeshire in January 2011 and again took them back up to the second tier in his second spell.

After the best part of three years at Doncaster he came back for a third go in 2019 and, you guessed it, guided them to promotion from League One again.

The son of legendary Manchester United boss Sir Alex then resigned in February 2022 only to return AGAIN a year later with the club back in the third tier.

Despite two play-off finishes and two EFL Trophy triumphs, his fourth spell has been more of a struggle and chairman Darragh MacAnthony said last week that results needed to improve with the side bottom of League One.

“I had an honest conversation with my manager and said ‘look, I need to know, have you got this?'” MacAnthony said.

“You love this football club, I’m not saying I’m firing you but I need you to talk to me and his response was ‘we’re there, you’ll see it, we will win games now, we’re ready’.”

If Posh were to part ways with 53-year-old Ferguson, you do feel it would only be a matter of time before he was back again.

Related topics

  • League Two
  • Cheltenham Town
  • League One
  • Sheffield United
  • Watford
  • Championship
  • Football

Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors tartan trousers have the ‘entire country’ searching for them

Claudia Winkleman is back with another stand out outfit on Celebrity Traitors and this time it’s her tartan trousers that have got fans on a desperate hunt to copy her look

Last night saw another episode of Celebrity Traitors hit our screens, but alongside the shock banishments and Alan Carr’s hilarious quips, there was one thing every viewer couldn’t stop talking about; Claudia Winkleman’s outfit. By now it’s no secret that her Highland looks are the star of the show, and fans regularly flock to stylist Sinead McKeefry’s Instagram account after the show to find out where they can shop her looks.

This time round it was Claudia’s red tartan trousers that had everyone talking, with one saying: “Highland gothic punk perfection… adding tartan trousers to my basket” whilst another agreed: “LOVE LOVE LOVE!!! The tartan.” A third joked: “Entire country Googling tartan trousers.”

READ MORE: Rochelle Humes’ wide leg Levi’s jeans are hailed ‘comfortable and soft’ by shoppers

READ MORE: Exact cosy fingerless gloves Claudia Winkleman wears on The Traitors are back in stock

Sadly Claudia’s exact pair of tartan trousers hailed from last year’s Alexander McQueen collection and have since sold out. However if you were hoping to add a pair of Claudia-inspired tartan trousers to your autumn wardrobe, don’t despair, because we’ve found three great alternatives you can still shop – and definitely won’t cost as much as her McQueen pair.

House of Bruar Cropped Tartan Trousers – £129.95

Come in sizes 10 to 20, House of Bruar’s tartan trousers are a great alternative to Claudia’s sold out pair and come in four different coloured tartans. They’re cut in a modern, form-flattering silhouette, featuring a cropped length and tapered leg, and a high waist with a double button waistband. The trousers are made from pure new wool which makes them warm to wear throughout autumn and winter, and are woven in a traditional Scottish way.

Boden Pleated Wool Culottes – £159

You’ll need to be quick if you want to grab this Boden pair as they’re already “selling like hotcakes” with a couple of sizes already sold out. You can save 15% on them when you use the code WXVK, and have a wider leg cut compared to Claudia’s slim-fitting trousers. They do however have the most similar tartan print, and are made from a wool-blend that keeps them warm and cosy whilst being easy to care for.

Joe Browns Vivienne Check Trousers – £50

Article continues below

If you want a slimmer fitting pair like Claudia’s, these skinny fit tartan trousers from Joe Browns are the perfect pick. With a red and black tartan print they’re the perfect combination of edgy and country chic – Claudia’s staple Traitors style – and are made from a soft stretchy fabric that keeps them comfortable all day long. Zipped pockets add some extra grunge, and they’re the perfect style for wearing with some chunky boots and an oversized knit.

Kim Kardashian’s daughter North has encouraged her to ‘move on’ from Kanye West

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West’s daughter, North West, accused her of ‘pretending to be okay’ with her single status and encouraged her to get a new boyfriend

Kim Kardashian revealed her daughter has encouraged her to ‘move on’ from ex-husband Kanye West after noticing she was ‘pretending to be okay’. The 44-year-old socialite and Kanye, 48, tied the knot in 2014, but their marriage soon crumbled and she filed for divorce seven years later, citing irreconcilable differences..

The former couple, who share North, Saint, nine, Chicago, seven, and Psalm, six, went through many ups and downs over the years, with Ye hitting out at the mother of his children multiple times on social media. Kim has mainly remained silent on her family affairs, but recently broke her silence in an interview on the Call Her Daddy podcast.

Speaking to host Alex Cooper, Kim said her 12-year-old daughter encouraged her to get a boyfriend.

READ MORE: Kim Kardashian details the ‘final straw’ that ended her marriage to Kanye WestREAD MORE: Kelsey Parker reveals baby plans and heartbreaking regret after tragic stillbirth

Kim said her daughter told her she was ‘pretending’ to be okay about being single and told her: “I think you go upstairs and cry at night.”

North reportedly also told her: “It’s time to move on. You need to have a boyfriend now.”

However, Kim insists she doesn’t want to be in another relationship, admitting: “I am single and I feel totally content. I have my kids to raise. I have a life that, like, requires a lot of my attention. And my kids just really need me right now.

“So I don’t know how I would fit something else in. So I’m just not looking.”

Kim touched upon her relationship issues with Kanye, revealing she was first attracted to him due to his intellect. However, their relationship very quickly became strained.

“When someone has like their first mental break, you want to be super supportive and you want to help figure that out and be there for them,” she explained.

“But when someone isn’t willing to make changes that I think would’ve been super healthy and beneficial, it makes it really hard to continue on in a relationship that can be toxic.”

Having children made it difficult for her to leave, and she stayed with the rapper, who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 2016 but later claimed he was misdiagnosed, in hopes he would improve.

When things never improved, she decided to leave and show their kids a ‘good example of setting boundaries’.

“I had to save myself in order to be a better mum for everyone,” Kim admitted. “And I think when everyone’s older they’ll be able to understand it and see that all.”

Article continues below

When asked about what the ‘final straw’ was, she said: “There was just a lot of things that I wouldn’t deal with. I didn’t like the talking bad about my kids’ grandmother, aunts – if someone feels that way, then we shouldn’t be together. You know, airing out a lot of stuff, a lot of personal stuff.”

Follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

READ MORE: ‘Best’ Charlotte Tilbury product sells ‘one a minute’ and is ‘brilliant for mature skin’READ MORE: Best value pre-lit Christmas trees to invest in now– and that can save households £875