Shoppers say they are ‘obsessed’ with the new outfit and ‘need’ to buy it
View 2 Images
Primark shoppers are ‘running’ for the ‘luxe’ outfit(Image: Getty)
Primark is selling a ‘luxe’ new outfit that has shoppers ‘obsessed’. Offered in trendy chocolate brown colour, the look could be ideal for customers who love the ‘colour of the season’. The high street retailer often goes viral for its affordable clothing, and the new crowd-pleaser is no exception.
The new look caught attention when it was shared in a viral TikTok video posted by fashion influencer Yaz Moore, under the handle @yazmoore. Recommending the chocolate brown outfit to her 95k followers, Yaz wrote: “Primark really has stepped up their game and I am so obsessed!! Look at this co ord.”
Yaz showcased the £16 Paula Echevarría Corduroy Tube Top and the £22 Paula Echevarría Mid Rise Flock Jeans. In her video, she explained: “I’ve just come into Primark and look at this co-ord they’ve started doing. It’s this cord, brown jean co-ord with these wide-leg jean trousers. How cute is this?
“I really need to pick this up to try. Saw it on the model the other day, and I thought, it looks so nice. I’m gonna pick this up and we’ll take it home and we’ll try it on and I’ll show you what it looks like.
“They even do it in a dress as well, which I think is also really nice. If you’re looking for something like this for autumn, then you wanna run to Primark.”
Content cannot be displayed without consent
Viewers loved what they saw, and the video racked up over 50k views. Reacting to the outfit, one fan commented: “This is lovely.” Another viewer wrote: “Love it.” Someone else echoed: “Loveee that! I need,” and Yaz replied: “How cute is it!! It fits so nicely too.”
For shoppers interested in the outfit, both the £16 Paula Echevarría Corduroy Tube Top and the £22 Paula Echevarría Mid Rise Flock Jeans are available for click and collect. Alternatively, shoppers can use Primark’s website to check in-store availability.
According to the product description, the top ‘cinches at the waist’ to create a ‘subtle peplum effect’. Primark states: “Add a structured touch to your wardrobe with this Paula Echevarría corduroy tube top.
“Made from 100% cotton in a chocolate brown shade, it has a straight-across strapless neckline and a bodycon fit that cinches at the waist. Vertical princess seams with contrast topstitching create shape and structure, while the slightly flared hem adds a subtle peplum effect.
“The soft corduroy-like texture gives it a refined finish, making it ideal for smart-casual or evening looks. A versatile piece that can be styled on its own or layered under jackets for added dimension.”
Article continues below
Like the top, which is suitable for daytime or evening events, the jeans can be dressed up or down, according to the product description. Primark states: “Give your denim days a luxe twist with these Paula Echevarría Mid Rise Flock Jeans. Made from 100% cotton with a soft, velvet-like texture, they bring comfort and sophistication to any outfit.
Narinder Kaur has arrived at Woolwich Crown Court, where she will sit in the public gallery as Laurence Fox attempts to have his Section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act dismissed
Daniel Bird Assistant Celebrity and Entertainment Editor
View 4 Images
Narinder Kaur was accompanied by her husband as she arrived at court(Image: PA)
Narinder Kaur and Laurence Fox have arrived at court ahead of his hearing. The former actor was charged under Sections 66A and 66B of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which was amended by the Online Safety Act 2023, after reposting sexually invasive images of the broadcaster on social media.
Earlier this year, Fox pleaded not guilty to the sexual offence charges. He was accused of sharing a “photograph or film of a person in an intimate state, intending to cause alarm, distress or humiliation”, in the first count, while the second alleges he sent a “photograph or film of genitals to cause alarm, distress or humiliation.”
Today’s hearing will address Laurence’s abuse-of-process application and his attempt to have his Section 66A charge dismissed. Narinder has waived her legal right to anonymity.
Narinder, who found fame on Big Brother, arrived at court with her husband, Jatinder Punia. Fox was charged in March after an eleven-month probe into his posts on X, formerly known as Twitter. The police had previously said the former Lewis star had been “charged with an offence contrary to section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003”, which “relates to an image that was posted on a social media platform in April 2024”. Section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act relates to “cyber flashing”.
The charge, introduced in 2023, makes it an offence to intentionally share a sexual image of someone without consent, with the aim of causing alarm, distress, humiliation or for sexual gratification.
Upskirting, taking images of people under their clothing without permission, became a criminal offence in 2019. Offenders can face up to two years in prison and be placed on the sexual offenders’ register.
Prosecutor David Burns told a hearing: “This relates to a post on X, posted by Mr Fox on April 30, 2024. That post shows a picture of the complainant in an intimate state, showing parts of her genitals.”
Narinder previously told The Times: “It’s like being assaulted every day, every time I tweet or go online… Every day I wake up and go to sleep horrified. It’s all because Laurence Fox and his gang of Merry Men decided I needed to be put in my place. I want it to go away, to disappear.”
Shortly after Fox shared the posts, he said he “would like to apologise” to Narinder. He went on to add, “It’s not my fault” that she was pictured in the compromising position over 15 years ago. After the criminal charges were announced, he claimed: “This is yet another deeply concerning example of the two-tier British ‘justice’ system in all its Soviet glory.
“How much more time, effort and taxpayer money are the @metpoliceuk going to spend ignoring actual crimes in their efforts to silence ordinary British people? Fight! Fight! Fight!”.
Article continues below
“I will deal with this untrue, ridiculous, vexatious and malicious nonsense just like last time they tried it on.”
Adam Peaty’s furious aunt has hit out at the Olympic swimmer and his influencer wife-to-be Holly Ramsay after he reportedly banned his mum from attending his lavish wedding
View 4 Images
Caroline Peaty reportedly had to hide her pain in front of her young grandson(Image: @cazliz123/X)
A heartbreaking new twist in the Adam Peaty family fallout has emerged, as the Olympian’s aunt has revealed the exact moment his mum Caroline was allegedly banned from his upcoming wedding to Holly Ramsay.
The sportsman’s mum was mysteriously left out from influencer Holly’s glamorous hen do. Instead, it’s said that she was left at home on grandma duties, looking after five-year-old grandson George, Adam’s son from a previous relationship. Her absence was made all the more glaring given Adam had made sure to include his famous future father-in-law Gordon Ramsay in his own stag do celebrations.
The lavish hen do wasn’t the only point of contention, according to a source close to Adam’s mum. They claim that when excited Caroline bought a dress for the upcoming wedding, Adam and Holly didn’t approve and offered to buy her another.
Sadly, the alleged tensions didn’t stop there, as Adam’s aunt Louise Williams has now claimed that her sister learned she’d been uninvited to the star-studded Bath Abbey wedding while busily returning little George back to the care of his mother, Eirianedd Munro. And the devoted grandmother apparently had to mask the deep “hurt and betrayal” she felt in front of her young grandchild.
READ MORE: Adam Peaty’s mum Caroline’s close bond with Holly Ramsay before bitter wedding row
And now the bitter row has taken another turn as Adam’s brother James has been arrested over allegations he sent threats to the sportsman during his stag weekend. While in Budapest on his stag do with his future father-in-law, Adam was said to have become alarmed after receiving text messages, with Holly alerting the police. His older brother, James, 34, was arrested at his home in Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, on Monday and has since been bailed.
Meanwhile, Adam’s dad has now spoken out for the first time, saying things have gotten out of hand between the family. Mark told The Sun: “They’re brothers, they’ve always been close, but like any normal family, brothers fight, argue, fall out, make up and start all over again. But it’s got out of hand, there’s been very little empathy towards Jamie’s genuine mental health difficulties.”
A source told the same newspaper that Adam believes his mother, Caroline, has been enabling Jamie’s alleged behaviour. They went on to state it was “ridiculous” that Adam was greeted by police, as Jamie had no intentions of harming his brother.
In an Instagram post this week, devastated Caroline posted the following quote: “Crying is a way your eyes speak when your mouth can’t explain how broken your heart is.”
Showing support for her sister, protective Louise took to the comment section, sharing that Caroline apparently wasn’t invited to Holly’s hen night, and wasn’t given an explanation as to why exactly she was slighted. She wrote: “The only good thing she [Caroline] got out of such a blow was the time she spent with her grandson.
“What was so incredibly cruel was that it was whilst she was returning him to the care of his mother that she was contacted by Adam and told she was no longer welcome at the wedding. She had to keep the pain, hurt and betrayal in because no way was she letting her grandson see how upset she was. Talk about sticking the knife in and twisting it,” the furious aunt claimed.
In another comment, Louise accused Adam of describing Caroline as a “crap mother”, despite the many “sacrifices” she’s had to make to support her son and his professional swimming career. The dedicated mum would make sure to get up early to take Adam to practice, and the ordinary, working-class family even went into debt to ensure he could achieve his dreams.
Louise shared: “My heart breaks for Caroline. She loves her children so much, and this has broken her. She does not deserve this at all. I could not stand by and let Adam and Holly do that to my sister.” Caroline now appears to have disabled the comments on the post.
This isn’t the first time Louise has rushed to social media to defend her sister on this matter. After Caroline didn’t make Holly’s hen-do, Louise spoke of how she’d been left “heartbroken” over what she deemed “divisive and hurtful” actions on Holly’s part. Louise also alleged that Adam had said “the most vile things a son can say to his mother”.
Elsewhere, Adam’s aunt claimed that Holly and Adam banned Caroline from the wedding because she did not apologise for failing to attend a recent family trip to Bath due to cancelled trains. The Olympic swimmer has also allegedly barred his mum from seeing her grandson, George.
It’s believed that Adam’s sister Bethany will now be the only family member from his side to watch him tie the knot, as many of those invited were reportedly unable to afford the price of accommodation and travel.
One relative revealed: “We were sent a ‘save the date,’ and it’s all these country houses. I’m on Universal Credit — I can’t afford that.” Relatives have also since claimed that Adam is “ashamed” of his roots, and “has been changed by money, fame and fortune”. According to one family source: “He seems to have forgotten where he came from.”
The Mirror has reached out to Adam Peaty’s representative for comment.
Do you have a story to share? Email me at julia.banim@reachplc.com.For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs onTikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTubeandThreads.
Article continues below
READ MORE: Stacey Solomon’s jewellery range has a new version of her best selling £170 Rolex-style watch
Oscar nominee Emily Blunt opens up about owing her career to The Devil Wears Prada ahead of next year’s much-anticipated sequel – as well as the acting royalty who had cross words with her
View 3 Images
Blunt’s iconic role in Devil Wears Prada changed her life, says the star(Image: PA)
Emily Blunt says The Devil Wears Prada, the second film she ever made, changed the course of her entire life. As the mother of two prepares to return for the much-anticipated sequel, she confessed it had been “terribly moving” to reprise the iconic role of Emily Charlton, Miranda Priestly’s first assistant, which she first played in 2006.
The ELLE Women in Hollywood honoree said, “It’s terribly moving. Because it changed everything. David Frankel [the director] changed my life by casting me when I was an unknown. In the interview with ELLE she added, “I’d been working, but no one knew who I was, and he was so sure that he wanted me in the movie, from a taped reading. That meant a huge amount to me.”
READ MORE: Cat Deeley wows in £46 M&S skirt that’s ‘perfect for the Christmas season’
Of the iconic Emily, the 42 year old called her “a ludicrous character” – but in the best way. ““It did leave the door open for people to see me as more than a British period drama girl. It paved the way for character roles, which is all I wanted. I didn’t want to be an ingenue. I was curious to explore an entire bag of tricks.”
Opening up on why the global Box office hit – set in a bitchy fashion magazine office in New York, and now a West End musical – is still so loved almost two decades on, she said, “The movie now is like a nostalgia bank for people. They’ve watched it with a sick parent; they’ve watched it when they go through a breakup. It has been a source of comfort and escapism.
“What starts off as a comedy—with the shock factor of the things they say, how they say them, and the ruthless nature of the fashion industry—then turns into something much more poignant and deep”
Blunt, who would go on to earn her first Oscar nomination in Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer as the nuclear physicist;s wife, also revealed that the scrutiny women come under is the ‘worst part’ of Hollywood. “I try to let it be like white noise. But I’m not immune to it. Also, don’t Google yourself. It’s a slippery slope.”
But the actress, who is married to fellow A Quiet Place star John Krasinski, learned one of her greatest lessons from another strong female – Dame Judi Dench, who she starred with in her first play aged 18, admitting working with the acting legend was ‘so magical’.
Article continues below
“She was really the lily pad to everything else. She was so kind to me, and even though I was the only person under the age of 50 in that cast,I felt like one of the gang… I saw someone at the very top of their game, one of the most revered actors around, and I saw how much humor was injected into every day.
She also remembers the day she annoyed her after coming in the morning after a night on the town. “I was wildly hungover and I almost didn’t make curtain call for the matinee. I remember her saying, “No, darling. No, never.” I almost shit myself and I’ve never been late again.”
Broadcaster Eamonn Holmes has been open about being hit with a huge tax bill recently which has meant he has had to sell off his properties in order to afford it
View 3 Images
Eamonn has taken a swipe at Lorraine
Eamonn Holmes has taken a swipe at his former ITV colleague Lorraine Kelly. The GB News presenter branded Lorraine an ‘actress’ as he compared their costly fights against the tax man.
The 65-year-old TV star said that his row with the tax office has cost him more than £1million as well as having to sell two of his houses and he still owes £250,000.
In a furious rant, Eamonn has now claimed that Lorraine has gone through a similar ordeal but managed to swerve paying up. He explained that she managed to get away from the tax as she reportedly said she was just playing a part on TV.
READ MORE: Boots’ bestselling neck serum is now even better at lifting sagging skin
READ MORE: Eamonn Holmes says tax row has cost him over £1m and two homes – and he still owes moneyREAD MORE: Ruth Langsford admits ‘it really frightens me’ as she fears devastating diagnosis
Speaking about his tax worries, Eamonn told the Belfast Telegraph: “Lorraine Kelly is deemed to be freelance because she’s not really Lorraine Kelly.
“She’s an actress who plays the part of Lorraine Kelly, she said. And once you have a defence, you have to stay that defence.
“I couldn’t say, I would say, you know, I’m an actor who plays the part of Eamonn Holmes, except I’m not. I’m the same off screen as I am on screen. There’s no different persona with me. And that’s the way it is.”
The random swipe at Lorraine came as Eamonn discussed how much he owed the HMRC and how this has impacted his life.
He explained that the “thieving HMRC” came after him and said that he couldn’t be deemed as self-employed anymore. The HMRC then requested 10 years of tax and national insurance to be paid.
Eamonn said this came at the “most vulnerable” time in his life and has ultimately “wrecked” him financially. He went on to sell his house in Belfast as well as a property in Portugal and still has another £250,000 to pay.
Back in July it was reported that Eamonn had racked up a six figure debt to the HMRC. The presenter runs his company Holmes & Away which takes in cash from his broadcast jobs.
The Sun reported that the production firm has racked up a six figure debt. Figures uploaded to Companies House showed the firm was£22,850 in the red for 2024 which came after a £18,000 surplus last year.
Annual accounts showed the TV host had creditors of almost £150,000 to pay. He also has a Corporation Tax rebate of £39,173 paid by HMRC
Eamonn has also been going through back pain issues over recent years. He had spinal surgery in 2022 due to chronic back pain that had been caused by three slipped discs.
Eamonn said the ailment had previously impinged on his sciatic nerve and affected the mobility of his right leg. Over the last year, the veteran TV star has been seen using a walking aid and a wheelchair due to his reduced mobility.
Article continues below
The Mirror have contacted Eamonn and Lorraine’s reps for comment.
Adam Peaty’s dad, Mark, has spoken for the first time following the news of an almighty row between the family as he addressed the swimmer’s brother being arrested
Daniel Bird Assistant Celebrity and Entertainment Editor
View 5 Images
Adam’s dad, Mark, has spoken out(Image: Instagram)
Adam Peaty’s dad has spoken out after the swimmer’s brother was arrested. James Peaty was arrested on Tuesday over allegations that he sent threats to the Olympian following the fallout over Holly Ramsay’s hen party.
Team GB star Adam, 30, was met by police officers when he returned to Manchester Airport following his stag do in Budapest. Adam is said to have allegedly received threats from his brother, sparking concern from his fiancée, Holly Ramsay, who alerted police.
It comes amidst a family fallout ahead of Adam and Holly’s wedding next month, which has seen his family excluded from the guest list. James, Adam’s older brother, had previously been asked to be a groomsman, but their relationship fell apart again in June this year.
Members of Adam’s family – including aunt Louise and his mum Caroline – have spoken out on social media about being ‘snubbed’ from Holly’s Cotswolds hen do that was attended by Victoria Beckham.
Now, Caroline’s husband Mark has spoken out after his son’s arrest.
Speaking to The Sun, Mark said: “They’re brothers, they’ve always been close, but like any normal family, brothers fight, argue, fall out, make up and start all over again. But it’s got out of hand, there’s been very little empathy towards Jamie’s genuine mental health difficulties.”
James was arrested at his home in Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, on Tuesday but was subsequently bailed. A spokesperson for Staffordshire Police said: “We arrested a 34-year-old man, from the Uttoxeter area, on November 11, 2025, on suspicion of harassment. The man was released on conditional bail while our enquiries continue.”
Sources have claimed that Adam’s mother, Caroline, has been enabling James’ alleged behaviour and said it was “ridiculous” that police met the former Strictly Come Dancing star at the airport. They added that James had no intentions of harming his younger brother.
Over the years, the two siblings have had a strained relationship since Adam’s 2021 autobiography. He was said to have been “upset” after the sportsman documented James’ struggles with his “demons”, including drug usage and portrayed him as a “bum”.
However, they rebuilt their bond and in June this year, James was working on a building project for Adam – until their relationship soured again. Now, Adam’s sister is said to be the only relative invited to his wedding to Gordon Ramsay’s daughter.
Caroline, who spent years travelling to swimming competitions, was absent from Holly’s hen do at Soho Farmhouse. Guests included Tana Ramsay and Victoria Beckham. However, sources have claimed that Holly felt Caroline didn’t match the image she wanted for her event due to her working-class background.
A source told Daily Mail: “You only have to look at the picture to see that there is a certain ‘type’.” They added: “They all look the same, and you wonder if Caroline might have stuck out a bit. She’s a normal woman, not a celebrity. You look at Holly’s Instagram and it’s all so planned, so super-glam and very, very showy. That’s not Caroline.”
Article continues below
It’s claimed that Adam and Holly also informed Caroline that she would have to wear a different dress from the one she had previously chosen for the ceremony. This was something that didn’t sit right with Caroline’s sister, Louise, who accused her nephew and Holly of body-shaming Caroline.
