Haiti is nearing ‘point of no return’ as gang violence surges: UN official

Haiti is approaching a “point of no return” as it struggles to respond to escalating gang violence, the top United Nations official in the country has said.

Maria Isabel Salvador, the UN special representative to the Caribbean nation, delivered the warning to the UN Security Council on Monday.

“As gang violence continues to spread to new areas of the country, Haitians experience growing levels of vulnerability and increasing scepticism about the ability of the state to respond to their needs,” Salvador said.

“Haiti could face total chaos,” she said, adding that aid and support for the international force deployed to stem rampant gang violence was desperately needed to avoid that fate.

“I urge you to remain engaged and answer the urgent needs of the country and its people,” she said.

The poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, Haiti faces severe political instability, with swaths of the country under the control of rival armed gangs who carry out widespread murders, rapes and kidnappings.

Salvador cited cholera outbreaks and gender-based violence alongside a deteriorating security situation.

Most recently, Salvador said, gangs seized the city of Mirebalais in central Haiti, freeing more than 500 prisoners during the assault. It was the fifth prison break in under a year and “part of a deliberate effort to entrench dominance, dismantle institutions and instil fear”, she said.

Armed gangs have also been increasingly battling for control of the capital, Port-au-Prince, with violence intensifying as rival gangs attempt to establish new territories, she said.

Meanwhile, a  Kenyan-led force authorised by the UN has failed to push back the gangs since the deployment began in June of last year. The mission has about 1,000 police officers from six countries, short of the 2,500 originally planned.

Kenya’s national security adviser, Monica Juma, told the council in a video briefing from Nairobi that the force has entered “a decisive phase of its operation” where gangs are coordinating operations and attacking people and strategic installations, and targeting the political establishment.

While the Haitian police and the multinational force have launched intensive anti-gang operations and achieved some notable progress, especially in securing critical infrastructure, she said a significant gap exists.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has also warned that further international support was “required immediately to allow the national police to prevent the capital slipping closer to the brink”, according to an unpublished report seen by the AFP news agency.

The report detailed the surge in violence, with the UN recording 2,660 homicides in the three months since December 2024 – a 41. 3 percent increase over the previous quarter.

But the report also pointed to a high civilian toll in efforts to counter the gangs.

During the period, anti-gang operations resulted in 702 people killed, with 21 percent estimated to be innocent civilians, the report said.

There was also an alarming increase in gender-based violence, with 347 incidents reported in the five months to February 2025, according to the UN data.

I felt BBC wanted me to leave Match of the Day, says Lineker

Steven McIntosh

Gary Lineker has said he believes the BBC wanted him to leave Match of the Day as he was negotiating a new contract last year.

The presenter and the BBC jointly announced in November that he would be stepping down from the flagship football programme, although he will still host World Cup and FA Cup coverage.

Asked by the BBC’s Amol Rajan why he would choose to leave given his successful tenure, Lineker said: “Well, perhaps they want me to leave. There was the sense of that. “

However, the BBC noted in the same statement that Match of the Day “continually evolves for changing viewing habits”.

PA Media Gary Lineker commentating for BBC Sport in 2021PA Media

Reflecting on his departure from Match of the Day, Lineker told Rajan: “It’s time. I’ve done it for a long time, it’s been brilliant. “

However, asked why he’d want to leave when the ratings were still high and it was a job Lineker still enjoyed, the former footballer said he “had the sense” the BBC had wanted him to step down.

“I always wanted one more contract, and I was umm-ing and ahh-ing about whether to do three years [more],” Lineker explained.

But, he continued, the matter of how long to sign for was complicated by the cycle of broadcasting rights for matches.

“In the end, I think there was a feeling that, because it was a new rights period, it was a chance to change the programme,” he said.

“I think it was their preference that I didn’t do Match of the Day for one more year, so they could bring in new people. So it’s slightly unusual that I would do the FA Cup and the World Cup, but to be honest, it’s a scenario that suits me perfectly. “

BBC suspension

Lineker was also asked about comments he posted on social media in March 2023, criticising the then-government’s immigration policy.

The remarks led to his suspension from the BBC, prompting other sports presenters to down tools in solidarity, something Lineker said he felt “moved” by.

Reflecting on his tweets, Lineker said he did not regret taking the position he did, but that he would not do it again because of the “damage” it did to the BBC.

“I don’t regret saying them publicly, because I was right – what I said, it was accurate – so not at all in that sense.

“Would I, in hindsight, do it again? No I wouldn’t, because of all the nonsense that came with it… It was a ridiculous overreaction that was just a reply to someone that was being very rude. And I wasn’t particularly rude back. “

He continued: “But I wouldn’t do it again because of all the kerfuffle that followed, and I love the BBC, and I didn’t like the damage that it did to the BBC… But do I regret it and do I think it was the wrong thing to do? No. “

The row erupted when Lineker called a government asylum policy “immeasurably cruel”, and said a video promoting it used language that was “not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s”.

The home secretary at the time, Suella Braverman, who appeared in the video, called his criticism “offensive” and “lazy”, while Downing Street said it was “not acceptable”.

Lineker’s post reignited the debate about the BBC’s impartiality guidance on social media and how it applied to presenters.

Behind the scenes of a BBC TV Studio (Plymouth), TV camera and BBC Logo on LED wall.

Lineker argued that the previous set of rules “were for people in news and current affairs”.

“They have subsequently changed,” he acknowledged. “But that left people like me, who has always given his honest opinions about things, then they suddenly changed them and you have to go, ‘Oh, I’ve got to be impartial now’. It doesn’t make any sense. “

He added: “I’ve always been strong on humanitarian issues and always will be, and that’s me. “

Lineker said that, following his tweets, “the goalposts were massively moved because it was never an issue until, suddenly, this point”.

The BBC updated its social media guidance in 2023 following a review that was commissioned in the wake of the fallout over Lineker’s tweets.

The corporation said presenters of flagship programmes, such as Match of the Day, “carry a particular responsibility to respect the BBC’s impartiality, because of their profile on the BBC”.

Gaza doc

Lineker hit the headlines again recently when he, along with 500 other high-profile figures, signed an open later urging the BBC to reinstate a documentary about Gaza to iPlayer.

The documentary, Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone, was pulled from the streaming service in February after it emerged its 13-year-old narrator was the son of a Hamas official.

Lineker told Rajan he would “100%” support the documentary being made available again, arguing: “I think you let people make their own minds up. We’re adults. We’re allowed to see things like that. It’s incredibly moving. “

He added that, although the 13-year-old was narrating the programme, the script had “not been written by [the child], it’s been written by the people who produced the show”.

“I think [the BBC] just capitulated to lobbying that they get a lot,” he said.

After concerns were raised, the BBC took down the programme while it carried out further due diligence. The matter is currently still being investigated by the corporation.

Gambling in sport

Getty Images Close-up on a man gambling online using a mobile app on his cell phone while drinking beer at the pubGetty Images

In the wide-ranging interview, which will be broadcast on Tuesday, Lineker also discussed his footballing career, his son’s leukemia battle as a baby, and his views on gambling sponsorship in sports.

Lineker said the football industry should rethink its responsibility when it comes to taking money from gambling firms.

“I know people [for whom] it becomes an addiction, it can completely destroy their lives,” he said.

“There’s talk about taking [logos] off the shirts, but you see it on the boards around the ground everywhere.

On top of his presenting roles, Lineker is also the co-founder of Goalhanger Podcasts, which make the successful The Rest is History series and its spin-offs about Politics, Football, Entertainment and Money.

The 64-year-old indicated to Rajan his next career move “won’t be more telly”, adding: “I think I’ll step back from that now.

“I think I’ll probably focus more on the podcast world, because it’s such a fun business and it’s just been so incredible. “

Paula Radcliffe says watching daughter undergo chemotherapy was ‘horrible’

Marathon runner Paula, 51, took daughter Isla to the paediatrician during lockdown after she experienced a variety of symptoms including stomach aches and loss of breath

Paula Radcliffe and her daughter Isla (Image: Charlie Varley/varleypix.com)

Celebrated marathon runner Paula Radcliffe has said it was “horrible” to watch her daughter Isla undergo chemotherapy and described it as “the hardest thing a parent can go through”. A decade on from Radcliffe’s final London Marathon and her 18-year-old daughter, who was diagnosed and treated for cancer in 2020, will be running her first 26. 2-mile race in the capital.

The long-distance runner, 51, took Isla to the paediatrician during lockdown after she experienced a variety of symptoms including stomach aches and loss of breath.

“It then moved very quickly. On the Tuesday she visited the doctor, we had a scan on the Wednesday and one week later we were already in the hospital starting the first round of chemo,” she told the Radio Times.

Talking about the treatment, she said: “It’s the hardest thing a parent can go through. “

“You can support them and be with them the whole way through, but you can’t do that chemo for them. It’s horrible to watch your child suffering through that, but at the same time we believed that if it felt bad, it was killing the cancer. “

Article continues below
Paula Radcliffe of Great Britain celebrates with her daughter Isla after winning the 2008 Womens ING New York City Marathon
Paula Radcliffe celebrates with her daughter Isla after winning the 2008 Womens ING New York City Marathon(Image: Getty Images)

She added: “There are things you’re not ready for either going through it or as a parent. She (Isla) doesn’t know how it has affected her chances of becoming a parent,” she said.

Radcliffe also has a son called Raphael with her husband Gary Lough and spoke about how her daughter’s diagnosis had affected him.

“There was a huge amount of mother’s guilt for the fact that you have to focus more on one child for that period of time,” she said.

Radcliffe will be commentating as part of the BBC team during the marathon, taking place on Sunday. “It’s an extremely emotional place to be anyway, when you see people turn that corner on the Mall and they realise they’ve done it”, she said.

“But when it’s your little girl doing it, that’s going to be a bit more emotional. “

Radcliffe told The Move Against Cancer Podcast in 2021 that Isla had undergone three rounds of chemotherapy and that it had been “really hard” for their family.

Her career saw her win the London and New York marathons three times each, along with victory in the 2002 Chicago Marathon.

She returned to marathon running for the first time in a decade at the Tokyo Marathon in March and ran the Boston Marathon on Monday.

Article continues below

Katie Piper’s heartache after vile messages from bullies 17 years after acid attack

Katie Piper has revealed she’s been the victim of cruel trolling as some have mistaken her acid attack scars for cosmetic procedures – telling her to ‘lay off the plastic surgery’

Katie Piper has revealed she’s been the victim of cruel trolling as some have mistaken her acid attack scars for cosmetic procedures(Image: WireImage)

Almost two decades on from being the victim of an acid attack, Katie Piper says she still gets strangers mistaking her scars for cosmetic procedures, with some even telling her to ‘lay off the botox’.

While filming her recent TV series, Locked Up In Louisiana, Katie visited a prison in New Orleans, and faced a wave of verbal abuse from its female inmates over her injuries.

“Some of them shouted stuff like, ‘Hey lady, are you addicted to Botox? ’ or ‘Slow down on the plastic surgery’,” recalls Katie, 41, during a new interview with Radio Times. She adds, “They didn’t know what had happened to me. ”

In 2008, Katie was the victim of an attack orchestrated by her ex-boyfriend, where he instructed a man to throw sulphuric acid at her face – leading to the model losing sight in one eye.

Katie Piper
In 2008, Katie was left with serious facial injuries and loss of eyesight after sulphuric acid was thrown on her(Image: Instagram/ @katiepiper_)
Article continues below

The man, Stefan Sylvestre, was given a lifetime sentence for the attack, while Katie’s ex-boyfriend was sentenced to 16 years in prison for planning the attack and for rape against Katie. She has had over 400 surgeries to repair the damage to her face and eyesight since.

The mum-of-two, who decided to get an artificial eye earlier this year, has since become a spokesperson for other victims of burns and began the Katie Piper Foundation, a charity to help others impacted, a year after her attack. In 2021, she was made an OBE for her services and charity work.

Now, Katie says that her past experiences earnt her the trust of prisoners in the New Orleans facility while filming for the upcoming show. However, the experience wasn’t all positive as many accused her of having surgery for cosmetic reasons.

Katie Piper Locked Up In Louisiana promo pic
Comments over Katie’s appearance were made while she filmed her new TV show, Locked Up In Louisiana (pictured on the show)

Sharing that she managed to relate to the prisoners on a deeper level while filming, the Loose Women panelist continued, “We’re all one bad day away from being locked up. You don’t know what’s going to happen to you in life and who’s going to harm you – and how you’re going to react when somebody harms you.”

Katie’s experience with the prisoners isn’t the first time she’s been the victim of abuse for her scars, after her appearance on Strictly Come Dancing in 2018 left her to deal with horrific comments from some viewers.

“I got some really horrible abuse, it was awful. I was told ‘You look like a monster’ by someone one night. It’s so cruel. Then someone else said, ‘Thank goodness for make-up. ,” she told The Mail On Sunday.

Katie Piper
Katie has had hundreds of surgeries to reconstruct her face since the attack, and decided this year to get an artificial eye(Image: Katie Piper Instagram)

But maintaining a strong exterior, Katie reiterated at the time that she was just ‘so glad to be alive’ following the attack.

Article continues below

Now a regular on the Loose Women panel alongside her new role as a presenter, Katie has been married to carpenter Richard James Sutton since 2015.

The couple share two children, ten-year-old Belle and Penelope, six. Katie’s new four-part series, Locked Up In Louisiana, comes after several other documentary-style shows fronted by the star, including Katie Piper: Jailhouse Mums. The show is set to air on 27 April on UKTV’s channel U.

No ball? No problem. How Forest are breaking the possession obsession

Getty Images
  • 24 Comments

“If God had wanted us to play football in the clouds, he’d have put grass up there. “

The legendary Brian Clough always had an interesting way of looking at things, and his view of long-ball football was no different.

He might well have been appreciative of passing the ball to feet, but the former Nottingham Forest boss would no doubt be enjoying the novel approach the Reds are taking to secure a return to European football this season.

On Monday they secured a hugely impressive 2-1 win at Tottenham, doing so having seen just 30% of the ball.

That has been the theme for almost all of their games this season, as they sit bottom of the Premier League when it comes to average possession statistics.

But the side that was battling against relegation last term currently sits third in the table and is firmly in the hunt for finishing in the Champions League places.

“We have a clear way to play and when we found ourselves in our identity,” Nottingham Forest manager Nuno Espirito Santo told BBC Match of the Day.

“We had goals [against Tottenham] but also they created chances in the second half and we had to hold on to what we had.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Has a Premier League side ever been so successful with so little possession?

Should Nottingham Forest finish in the top four with their current average possession statistics, they will become the first team to do so with such a low figure.

Leicester City memorably won the Premier League against the odds in 2015-16 and did so with average possession statistics of 42. 4%

But Everton, with 48. 5% in 2004-05, are the only other side to finish in the top four with less than 50% possession on average.

So far this season Forest have seen just 39. 3% possession per game.

A solid defence and a clean-sheet expert goalkeeper

Possession, of course, isn’t everything.

Southampton have been relegated from the Premier League and are still in danger of equalling the lowest-ever points total in the top-flight, yet they have gone down with better possession statistics than almost half the rest of the league.

All of this isn’t to say Forest’s football is unattractive.

They are instead masters of winning the ball high up the pitch and then quickly turning that into attacking opportunities through their impressive ball carriers, such as Anthony Elanga and Callum Hudson-Odoi.

“That’s one of their main characteristics,” said Nuno. “They have the talent to give us these steps forward up the pitch. “

They are also clinical with the chances they get, as shown against Tottenham as they scored two goals from their three efforts on target.

And once they get ahead they rarely let teams back in.

Matz Sels attempts to make a save in the Premier League Getty Images

“You cannot ignore when you are in front the priority is to contain and block the game,” said Nuno.

“We help each other in every situation, give balance, help each other, clear things off the line. “

They are also ahead of 12 other Premier League teams in many of the key defensive metrics, making the most clearances and headed clearances, while they rank highly for most interceptions (eight), tackles (seven) and saves (seven).

Only champions-elect Liverpool and second-placed Arsenal can boast a better defence than Forest’s, which has conceded just 39 goals in 33 games, while in Matz Sels they have the goalkeeper who is leading the way in the fight for the Golden Glove this season.

The Belgian has kept 13 clean sheets so far this season in the Premier League and was only denied a 14th by Richarlison’s late header, after stopping the striker with a brilliant save a few minutes earlier.

“You might be critical of other teams for sinking deep, but Forest actually want to do that and say ‘we’ll back ourselves’,” former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher said on Sky Sports.

Related topics

  • Nottingham Forest
  • Football

Harvard University sues Trump administration over funding freeze

Harvard University has sued US President Donald Trump’s administration to halt the government’s pause of more than $2bn in funding for the US educational institution.

“Over the course of the past week, the federal government has taken several actions following Harvard’s refusal to comply with its illegal demands,” Harvard President Alan Garber said in a statement on Monday.

“Moments ago, we filed a lawsuit to halt the funding freeze because it is unlawful and beyond the government’s authority,” Garber said.

Among the United States government agencies mentioned in Harvard’s lawsuit were the Education Department, the Health Department, the Justice Department, the Energy Department and the General Services Administration.

The Trump administration had no immediate comment.

But Trump and his White House team have publicly justified their campaign against universities as a reaction to what they say is uncontrolled “anti-Semitism” and a need to reverse diversity programmes aimed at addressing the historical oppresion of minorities.

The administration claims protests against Israel’s war in Gaza that swept across US college campuses last year were rife with anti-Semitism.

“The Government has not – and cannot – identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America’s position as a global leader in innovation,” Harvard’s legal complaint read.

Many US universities, including Harvard, cracked down on the protests over the allegations at the time, with the Cambridge-based institution placing 23 students on probation and denying degrees to 12 others, according to protest organisers.

Other institutions, including Columbia University in New York City, have bowed to less far-ranging demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left wing.

Tyler Coward, the lead counsel for government affairs with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a nonpartisan First Amendment group, praised Harvard for “taking a principled stand against federal overreach that threatens the core values of higher education”.

“The Trump administration’s attempt to bypass federal civil rights law and impose sweeping ideological mandates through financial coercion sets a dangerous precedent,” Coward said.

“Colleges must comply with civil rights laws to receive federal funding. Enforcement of those laws must be lawful, transparent, and respect constitutional rights. ”