Tish Cyrus went public with her romance with the actor in November 2022, and just weeks later, Dominic Purcell popped the question, with the help of her famous daughter Miley Cyrus
This article contains affiliate links, which means we will receive commission on any sale of products or services we write. Learn more
Miley Cyrus’ mum shares how she fixed ‘strained relationship’ with daughter Noah(Image: Getty Images for The Recording Academy)
Miley Cyrus’ mother, Tish Cyrus, has discussed how she strengthened her reportedly strained relationship with daughter Noah Cyrus. The mother-daughter duo was said to be feuding in recent years after Tish started dating Prison Break star Dominic Purcell, who reportedly once casually dated Noah.
Tish went public with her romance with the actor in November 2022, and just weeks later, Dominic popped the question, with the help of her famous daughter Miley. Tish revealed the engagement news in 2023, and in August 2024, they tied the knot in a small ceremony in Miley‘s backyard at her home in Malibu.
Tish and Dominic tied the knot two years ago(Image: @tishcyrus/instagram)
It was claimed at the time that Noah wasn’t at the wedding, as she supposedly dated Dominic before Tish did. However, after over a year of rumours on their relationship, Tish and Noah shocked fans when they reunited for a TikTok this month.
And on a recent episode of Tish and Brandi Cyrus’ podcast, Sorry We’re Cyrus, Noah joined in on the fun and discussed their bond and how they grew closer.
Tish said being physically closer to her daughter helped fix their issues. “Noah moved this year. That’s been so good for us,” she explained, saying they were “able to go on our walks and we found our new favourite ice cream truck. “
Liz Hurley recently shared a photo of Billy Ray kissing her(Image: @elizabethhurley1/instagram)
Noah went on to reveal her fiancé, Pinkus, is ‘really close’ to her mum which she ‘loves so much’ as Tish didn’t get along with her past boyfriends.
Tish said: “I love him so much and honestly… he is a man. He’s so respectful and driven and sweet. Honestly I think he is perfect. He is so awesome and I could not be happier that you are with him. “
Meanwhile, it was during an interview on the Call Her Daddy podcast last year that Tish revealed she had pursued Dominic after calling time on her 28-year marriage to ex-husband Billy Ray Cyrus, and sent him a DM on Instagram.
A source claimed Noah was “seeing Dominic when Tish started pursuing him,” and the mother-of-five “was aware” of her daughter’s relationship with the actor.
The source went on to allege that Miley had security outside her home in Malibu when her mother’s wedding ceremony was taking place in an effort to keep out Noah.
The mother and daughter have not spoken about the claims. Meanwhile, Billy Ray Cyrus shocked fans when he was pictured kissing Elizabeth Hurley.
Billy sent the showbiz world into meltdown when model, Liz, shared a snap of them kissing on Instagram – tagged with a love heart – on Easter Sunday.
Famous friends and fans of the couple quickly rushed to the comments section to congratulate Liz, 59, and Billy, 63, on their romance. Unsurprisingly, Tish, 57, who divorced the country star in 2022, was not among them.
Katy Perry created history on the Blue Origin space mission earlier this month but social media influencer Laura Young believes that the singer could have inspired more people in other ways
Katy Perry’s Blue Origin space flight branded ‘deflating’ amidst backlash
Katy Perry made history by taking part in the Blue Origin space flight which had an all-female crew. But influencer Laura Young believes that the flight which lasted just a matter of minutes lacked depth.
Laura, who was crowned Scotland’s Influencer of the Year has been an active campaigner on environment issues for sometime and has also spearheaded the ban on disposable vapes, which comes into place in June this year. The 27-year-old from East Renfrewshire has now spoken on the environmental impact Katy’s space flight has had and how she could have inspired her daughter, Daisy, in another way.
The flight, which consisted of Katy, Gayle King, film producer Kerianne Flynn, former NASA scientist Aisha Bowe, US journalist Lauren Sanchez, US research scientist Amanda Nguyen made history as they headed into space with an all female crew for the first time since 1963.
READ MORE: ‘I tried Whisker’s Litter-Robot 4 to see if it could end the daily cat litter nightmare for good’
Katy took a daisy into space for her young daughter, Daisy
Speaking exclusively to the Mirror, Laura who has been announced as the Girlguiding environment ambassador, scientist and climate activist said: “Any celebrity space flight would get backlash, but it was tough seeing this mission framed as groundbreaking when it lacked depth. And ironically, the fact it was all women made the criticism sting more, because we all hoped it would be more meaningful.”
Article continues below
Reflecting on Katy’s tribute to her young daughter, which saw her take a daisy flower on the flight in Jeff Bezo’s spacecraft with her, Laura added: “I thought it was lovely that Katy brought a daisy for her daughter but Daisy might learn more about protecting the planet by joining Rainbows and earning her Eco Award. Inspiration doesn’t have to leave the atmosphere. It can start right here, in your local community. “
However, Laura who boasts 43,200 followers alone admits she wanted to be inspired by the mission but was left feeling “deflated”. She said: “It looked more like a glossy PR moment than a genuine push for progress in science or space exploration. ” She went on to said that the flight had “zero scientific significance,” adding: “Nor has the importance of space science been highlighted throughout the media splash from the celebrity passengers. “
The flight has also sparked backlash from environmentalists after a 2022 World Inequality Report stated that a single space flight of several minutes emits more carbon emissions than one billion humans would in their lifetime. On the Blue Origin New Shepard website, they claim that the system of the “reusable” space craft had been designed to “decrease the cost of access to space and reduce waste. “
They add that the BE-3PM engine is fuelled by highly efficient liquid oxygen and hydrogen” and that it’s engine com-buster is “water vapour with no carbon emissions. ” Laura commented: “We’re being told to recycle, cut down on flying, and lower our carbon footprints – and then we watch celebrities rocket into space for under 11 minutes. Even if Blue Origin says it’s rocket emits just water vapour, that still has consequences for our atmosphere and climate.
“Emissions from this rocket eat away at the ozone layer, and do untold damage to our incredibly important atmosphere. The estimated environmental footprint of this trip is hard to quantify, but our best guess is that this one flight will have the same carbon footprint, if not more, as what someone will emit across their entire lifetime. “
But while commercial space travel appears to be an option for those with millions in the bank, Laura believes that the money used on such trips would be better suited to being spent on Earth. “Imagine how far it could go towards funding climate solutions or STEM education programmes that actually make a lasting impact,” she said.
Katy Perry took part in the historic space flight(Image: BLUE ORIGIN/AFP via Getty Images)
The social media star who is a keen supporter of women entering careers in STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) adnits it was “frustrating” following the trip. “It was sold as empowering, but it didn’t really show the work or the expertise behind real progress in these fields. It felt like faux feminism – style over substance,” she said.
However, while the trip has sparked backlash, Katy and the female crew have also received praise for the historic flight. Theresa Payton, who served as President George W. Bush’s Chief Information Officer told the Mirror: “It was fearless. It showed women, young women, girls that they belong among the stars. It definitely reminds us that we should dream bigger. Katy Perry’s words on the matter, I see she’s being panned but I have to say, as a working mum, her words hit home for me and every other working mother who’s juggling their career and family.
“So it was really great to see. I get it, some people feel like it was more of a billionaire’s joy ride, is what I think somebody wrote but I love this opportunity to talk about this. This wasn’t just a flight, it was really a launch pad for ambition. We have no idea how many young women and girls will walk away inspired. Maybe they’ll card the next Mars Rover or maybe they will create the next design, eco-friendly rocket. Maybe they’ll be inspired to be an astronaut but that’s the ripple effect that I think we could have from something like this. “
Girlguiding, the UK’s largest youth organisation dedicated to girls, has launched their Eco award for girls aged 4-18 to mark the first anniversary of their environmental sustainability strategy, which pledges to halve its carbon emissions by 2040 and is funded by The Leslie Sell Charitable Trust.
On April 11, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student and lawful United States permanent resident, can be deported. Not for committing a crime. Not for violating immigration rules. But for his political speech – specifically for helping organise a peaceful Gaza solidarity encampment at his university.
The government’s case against Khalil is hinged on Section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a Cold War-era provision that permits the deportation of any noncitizen whose presence is deemed a potential threat to US foreign policy. The evidence the government submitted against him was a two-page memo from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, asserting – without proof – that Khalil’s “beliefs and associations” could “adversely affect U. S. foreign policy interests”. Ironically, the document itself admitted that Khalil’s actions were “otherwise lawful”.
And yet, it was enough. The mere invocation of “foreign policy” or “national security” now operates like a legal incantation, overriding First Amendment protections, due process and even common sense.
Khalil’s case is not an outlier. It is the leading edge of a broader strategy to silence dissent in the US – particularly dissent critical of Israeli policies or sympathetic to Palestinian rights – using various legal tools. This use and abuse of the US legal system sets a dangerous precedent that in the long run will harm American democracy.
Dozens of international students and scholars – many from Muslim-majority countries or racialised communities – have also been subjected to surveillance, detention and deportation, often without any allegations of criminal wrongdoing.
Among them is Badar Khan Suri, a visiting academic at Georgetown University and Indian citizen who was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at his home in Virginia and later transferred to Texas. He remains in detention, facing removal based on his family ties. The father of his American wife used to work as an adviser to the Gaza government.
Another example is Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Fulbright scholar and doctoral student at Tufts University who was detained after co-authoring a newspaper opinion piece related to the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement. A US immigration judge has since denied her release, labelling her a “flight risk and a danger to the community”.
Another recent case is that of Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian green card holder and Columbia student protest leader who was arrested by ICE agents when he went for his US citizenship interview. He now faces deportation to the occupied West Bank, which he said would be “a death sentence”, given that he has lost family and friends to Israeli military violence.
Then there’s Momodou Taal, a British-Gambian PhD candidate at Cornell University who filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s administration, arguing that executive orders targeting pro-Palestinian activists violated his First and Fifth Amendment rights. Despite suing preemptively and being legally represented, Taal’s efforts were ultimately undermined by jurisdictional manoeuvring and executive pressure. His emergency injunction was denied by a federal judge on March 27, and days later, he self-deported, saying he no longer trusted the courts to protect him even with a favourable ruling.
There is also Yunseo Chung, a South Korean-born Columbia student and US permanent resident who narrowly avoided deportation thanks to a preemptive federal court injunction. Alireza Doroudi, an Iranian engineering PhD student at the University of Alabama, was quietly detained with no explanation. Ranjani Srinivasan, an Indian student at Columbia, fled to Canada after ICE agents visited her apartment. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) later released footage of her departure, labelling her a “terrorist sympathiser”.
In this campaign of political persecution, the Trump administration has largely relied on immigration courts, which are not part of the independent federal judiciary under Article III of the US Constitution.
They are administrative tribunals housed within the executive branch, specifically, the Department of Justice. Their judges are appointed by the attorney general, lack tenure and are subject to political oversight. The procedural protections available in Article III courts – such as full evidentiary hearings, impartial review and constitutional due process – are substantially weakened in immigration courts.
While federal courts may scrutinise whether an arrest or deportation violates constitutional protections – like the First Amendment or equal protection – immigration judges are often empowered to rule based on vague assertions of “foreign policy concerns” or “national security interests” with little to no requirement for concrete evidence. This dual-track legal system allows the government to bypass the constitution while maintaining the appearance of legality.
There have been numerous calls to reform this system from legal scholars, human rights organisations and even former immigration judges. Proposals have included moving immigration courts out of the Department of Justice and into an independent Article I court structure to ensure judicial impartiality.
However, these reforms have consistently failed, largely due to congressional inaction as well as political resistance from successive administrations that have benefitted from the system’s malleability. The executive branch has long viewed immigration courts as a tool of policy enforcement rather than neutral adjudication.
While this crackdown has so far focused on noncitizens with legal status, it could soon extend to naturalised Americans. US law allows the revocation of citizenship in cases of fraud, membership in terrorist organisations and other crimes. In his first term, Trump created a dedicated “Denaturalization Section” within the Department of Justice to pursue citizenship revocations. About 700,000 immigrant files were investigated with the aim of bringing 1,600 cases to court.
Trump has now signalled that he intends to pick up his denaturalisation drive where he left off. If he deploys this legal tool against critical voices, this would mean that even citizenship may no longer offer protection if one’s political views fall out of favour with the government.
As the Department of Justice, DHS and ICE have worked together on the campaign against dissent, they have received public support from nonprofit organisations. Groups like Betar and Canary Mission have taken public credit for identifying international students involved in pro-Palestinian activism and urging their deportation.
Betar claims to have compiled a list of foreigners it labelled as “jihadis” and submitted it to the Trump administration. Canary Mission, meanwhile, launched a project called “Uncovering Foreign Nationals”, which publishes the names and photos of international students it accuses of anti-Semitism or anti-Israel activism – effectively creating a blacklist.
While there is no official confirmation that DHS or ICE have acted directly on these materials, the close timing between these campaigns and government enforcement has raised serious concerns that these politically motivated private groups are shaping federal immigration enforcement without transparency or accountability.
The US portrays itself as a beacon of liberty, a nation governed by the rule of law, where freedom of speech is sacred. But Khalil’s case – and the others like it – paint a starkly different picture. If your residency, citizenship, education or even physical freedom can be revoked for peacefully expressing political views, then speech is no longer a right. It is a conditional privilege.
This is more than a legal overreach. It is a moral crisis for American democracy. When free speech becomes contingent on political loyalty and when private blacklists shape federal enforcement, the foundational values of liberty, pluralism and equality before the law are being dismantled.
What American democracy urgently needs is congressional action to establish judicial independence in immigration courts, stronger First Amendment protections for noncitizens and full transparency around the government’s reliance on private ideological actors. Anything less risks enshrining a two-tiered system of rights and, ultimately, a country where dissent itself is deportable.
This is not just a test of immigration policy. It is a test of democracy – and of the very soul of the nation itself.
As DIY lovers tune into George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces, we take a look at his eventful love life, from his two failed marriages to his current relationship with an opera singer
George Clarke has found love again after two failed marriages
George Clarke is best known for his architectural expertise, but many fans may not realise he has a deeply romantic side.
In an interview with the Big Issue, the 50-year-old architect candidly admitted: “On relationships, I’m probably not the best person to talk to because I’ve been divorced twice. So it’s not easy.” It’s clear that love means a great deal to George however, and he’s described it as ‘the biggest thing in the world’.
Showing his emotional side, George continued: “But when it comes to love and friendship and family, it’s the best thing in the world. I’m an emotional softie. You’ve probably seen me cry on the telly. ” The road to true love hasn’t exactly run smoothly for romantic George however, and he’s had to navigate a few hurdles along the way.
As DIY-loving viewers get inspired by George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces, the Mirror takes a look at George’s bumpy love life…
READ MORE: George Clarke launches into potty-mouthed rant with public toilet confession
First marriage and touching Olympic gesture
George spoiled first wife Catriona with a sparkling diamond gift(Image: Matt Gillis)
Article continues below
Sunderland-born George met his first wife, Australian female animator and art director Catriona Drummond, back in the early 2000s after her brother, former Armani model Swiggy Drummond, hired him for some architectural work. Wedding bells rang in 2009, and the couple went on to enjoy some glamorous adventures together.
Reflecting upon the most romantic thing he’d ever done, George revealed that he’d once treated Catriona to some luxury diamonds during a trip to Rome. He shared: “I pretended I needed to go off alone to buy some new sunglasses, and instead, on a whim, I went into the Cartier shop. I remember saying to the shop assistant, ‘I need to buy some diamonds. ‘
“And wow, do they give you the royal treatment. I was slightly scared. They’re all in these white gloves and they take you upstairs to a private area. I bought her a necklace and some earrings. All the blokes in the couples we’d made friends with at the hotel were really annoyed. They were like, ‘Thanks. We’re going to have to do that now! ‘”
Tragedy struck when Catriona’s brother Swiggy died from brain cancer at the age of just 39, before getting the chance to carry the Olympic torch in 2012. In a touching tribute, George decided to carry it himself on Swiggy’s behalf. George said: “I was proud to carry the Olympic torch on behalf of my brother-in-law, Swiggy Drummond, who died recently from cancer. “
After settling into married life together in a Notting Hill house renovated by George, the couple appeared to be blissfully happy with each other, and their three children, Georgie, Emilio, and Iona. Indeed, when asked by one interviewer what his favourite thing was, George replied: “Going home to see my wife and our children. “
Tragically, George’s ‘hectic’ work schedule reportedly took its toll on their marriage, and, in 2013, the couple announced they were parting ways. In a statement, George explained: “We have been married quite a long time and decided to part. We have separate custody of the kids and are going through an amicable separation and divorce. “
Later that same year, George had to contend with false rumours that he had a new special someone in his life after he was spotted with a mystery woman at St David’s Hotel in Cardiff on Boxing Day 2013, with photos showing him leaving the premises the following day.
Denying claims of a new romance at the time to the Mirror, George stated: “The person who I was with doesn’t have anything to do with any of it. She wasn’t my wife and she isn’t my partner. I don’t have a girlfriend now.”
Second marriage and ‘tribulations’
George and Katie tied the knot in a gorgeous beachside ceremony, but there were ‘tribulations’ to come(Image: Stephen d’Antal / MEGA)
In September 2018, George said ‘I do’ a second time, this time to American fashion marketing and communications consultant Katie Morgan Jones, with the couple tying the knot in a romantic Ibiza ceremony. As newlyweds, George and Katie set up home in London, before making opting for country life in the Cotswolds.
George wrote in The Times: “I’m in Gloucestershire with my wife and three kids. The house, which we bought last year, sits on a steep hill so you enter it at the upper level. We have the kitchen and living room on the first floor, while the bedrooms, bathrooms and storage rooms are on the ground floor.
“I also have a place in London, but home is in the Cotswolds now. I have quite a nomadic life – I travel a lot and spend on average three nights a week in hotels – so I take every opportunity I can to get home. “
Their wedded bliss didn’t last however, and by the end of 2021, Katie began posting several cryptic posts via Instagram, telling followers, ‘It’s time for change’. In one post, she claimed to have been through ‘the most bizarre and traumatic situation’.
In other posts concerning the period of lockdown, Katie alleged she’d been ‘isolated on [her] own’, claiming to have suffered through ‘many, many other trials and tribulations, tears and revelations’. In February 2022, George confirmed they were splitting up.
Finding love again with widowed opera singer
George has found love again with opera singer Florence(Image: Dave Benett/Getty Images for Jag)
In July 2023, George went public with his romance with opera singer Florence Hvorostovsky. Widowed Florence had previously been married to Russian baritone Dmitri Hvorostovsky, who tragically died in 2017 following a brain tumour diagnosis.
Florence, who shared children Maxim and Nina with her late husband, was supported in her new relationship by her in-laws, who gave her their blessing to find love again after grief. In an interview with MailOnline, Dmitri’s cousin Alexey Zarkhin declared that the family were pleased for the pair and glad she had found someone.
Alexey said: “We must understand that if a woman doesn’t support her femininity, she would quite quickly turn into an old lady. Nobody would be interested in her then – neither her children, nor anyone else. So however great was her late husband, and however much she loved him, we all – us all, her children, and the public – need a vibrant, lively, beautiful Florence. “
Article continues below
You can catch George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces at 9pm on Tuesday, April 22 on Channel 4. Follow Mirror Celebs onSnapchat ,Instagram ,Twitter ,Facebook ,YouTube andThreads
READ MORE: ‘I tried Whisker’s Litter-Robot 4 to see if it could end the daily cat litter nightmare for good’
Hollywood actor Timothée Chalamet’s mother, Nicole Flender, has spoken out for the first time about his relationship with reality TV star Kylie Jenner
Timothee Chalamet’s mum finally shares opinion on Kylie Jenner amid family feud
Timothée Chalamet’s mother has finally weighed in on his high-profile relationship with Kylie Jenner – as tensions reportedly simmer between Kylie and Timothée’s sister, Pauline. The Call Me By Your Name actor, 29, and the 27-year-old beauty mogul first sparked romance rumors back in spring 2023, and since then, their relationship has been a lightning rod for controversy online.
However, not everyone in Timothée’s inner circle seems thrilled with his choice of partner. His older sister, Pauline Chalamet, 33, has been suspected of throwing shade at Kylie on multiple occasions through pointed social media posts.
Now, in a candid conversation with Curbed, Timothée’s mom, Nicole Flender, shared her perspective on her son’s romantic life – and she had only kind words for Kylie. “I have to say she’s lovely,” Nicole said, reflecting warmly on her interactions with Kylie. “She’s very nice to me. “
Timothee’s mum is a huge fan of Kylie(Image: Getty Images for BFI)
However, the same can’t be said for Pauline as the actress has taken a far less subtle approach. Just last month, she appeared to criticise extreme wealth on her Instagram Stories, sharing a New York Times article about cuts to foreign aid while highlighting America’s “insane wealth disparity” — a pointed remark given Kylie’s estimated $700 million fortune.
Article continues below
Pauline wrote alongside the article: “New York Times, liberal bias, yes yes yes I get it. But this one by @nickkristof is worth the read. It’s about empathy and humanity. The United States faces a tremendous number of domestic issues.
“Our maternal mortality rate is embarrassing, our way of shopping and eating food completely out of season makes no sense, we’re spoiled in our desire to BLAST ACs and heat, our INSANE wealth disparity is sick, the list literally goes ON and ON.
Pauline doesn’t appear to be too fond of Kylie(Image: Penske Media via Getty Images)
“BUT just take a second and think about the fact that LESS THAN 1 PERCENT of all of our money goes to humanitarian aid. That money is insignificant in fixing any of the larger problems that play in the United States. And yet so significant to the lives of millions of individuals across this shared home we call Earth. “
Pauline had previously amplified a scathing anti-billionaire sentiment by reposting a Bernie Sanders tweet critiquing extreme wealth and private jet culture – behaviors often associated with the Kardashian-Jenner clan.
Sources close to the Chalamet siblings told The U. S. Sun that Timothée and Pauline’s relationship is “at an all-time low,” with Pauline’s disdain for Kylie driving a wedge between them for the first time ever.
“Something is broken,” one insider revealed, alleging that Pauline feels Kylie “doesn’t share the same values and morals” as Timothée and that their relationship will ultimately end when Kylie “gets bored. “
Timothee and Kylie have been dating since early 2023(Image: Golden Globes 2024 via Getty Images)
“Pauline thinks that Kylie is with her brother because it boosts her image – it looks cool to be dating one of Hollywood’s most talented rising stars,” the source continued. “She thinks Kylie’s interest is more about clout than genuine love. “
Last month, other insiders speaking to The U. S. Sun also voiced serious family worries, warning that marriage between Timothée and Kylie would be a “terrible mistake. ” A relative described the couple as “two complete opposites,” wondering aloud how they could ever sustain a lasting union: “It’s a mystery. Many of us don’t understand how they connect. “
As for Pauline, her patience appears to be wearing thin. “She’s tired of what she calls ‘The Kylie Show,'” the source said. “Timothée and Pauline barely talk these days. This relationship has driven a major wedge between them – and the gap only seems to be widening. “
The Mirror has reached out to Timothee’s representatives for comment on this story.
Article continues below
Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs onTikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTubeandThreads.
READ MORE: Cruelty-free hair growth tablets that gives ‘biggest difference in weeks’
