Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

16 Killed, 52 Injured In Kano Road Crash

A tragic road accident at the Muhammadu Buhari Interchange Flyover in Hotoro, Kano, has claimed the lives of 16 people and left 52 others injured. 

The fatal crash, which occurred at approximately 9:50 p.m. on Tuesday along the Kano-Maiduguri Road, involved a DAF trailer carrying goods and passengers.

The Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Kano Sector Command, attributed the accident to overspeeding and dangerous driving, which led to a loss of control under the bridge.

Confirming the incident, the Public Relations Officer of the FRSC Kano Sector Command, Abdullahi Labaran, stated: “Our rescue team, in collaboration with the Nigeria Police Force, swiftly responded to the scene to carry out emergency operations and restore traffic flow.”

READ ALSO: 14 Survive Road Crash On Third Mainland Bridge

He disclosed that 71 people were involved in the crash, with 52 sustaining various degrees of injuries. The victims were promptly evacuated to Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital for urgent medical attention.

Reacting to the tragedy, the Sector Commander of the FRSC Kano, CC UM Matazu, extended his condolences to the families of the deceased and wished the injured a speedy recovery.

He also emphasised the dangers of overloading trailers with passengers, goods, and animals.

“We strongly warn drivers against such dangerous practices, which significantly increase the risk of fatal crashes,” Matazu stated.

Meanwhile, an FRSC investigation team has been deployed to further probe the circumstances surrounding the crash. The obstruction caused by the accident has since been cleared, restoring the free flow of traffic in the area.

UNIZIK Expels Student Over Assault On Lecturer

The authorities of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University, (NAU), have expelled a student, Goddy-Mbakwe Chimamaka Precious, for assaulting a lecturer from the Department of Theatre and Film Studies.

This was announced in a statement on Friday by the Acting Registrar, Victor Modebelu.

Modebelu said the Acting Vice-Chancellor had received the report from the Student Disciplinary Committee on the student’s assault on a lecturer from the Department of Theater and Film Studies.

According to him, the decision followed the recommendation of the Student Disciplinary Committee, which found the student’s actions to be a gross violation of the institution’s disciplinary regulations, specifically Regulation 4 (SDR).

“The Ag. Vice-Chancellor has received the report from the Student Disciplinary Committee on the case of your assault on a lecturer from the Department of Theater and Film Studies, which was found to be a gross misconduct and violation of the Students Disciplinary Regulations particularly Regulation 4 (SDR),” the statement read.

“Consequently, the Ag. Vice-Chancellor has, on behalf of the University Senate, approved the Committee’s recommendation that you be expelled and you are hereby expelled from Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka. The expulsion takes immediate effect.

“You are expected to vacate the University premises immediately and return any University property in your possession.”

Three captives in Gaza, 369 Palestinians held by Israel to be released

Three captives are to be released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in exchange for 369 Palestinians held in Israeli jails as part of the ceasefire in Gaza.

The captives to be released on Saturday were identified as US-Israeli Sagui Dekel-Chen, Russian-Israeli Alexandre Sasha Troufanov and Argentinian-Israeli Yair Horn.

While the names of the Palestinians to be released have not been announced, Israeli media reported that 333 were arrested in Gaza and will be sent back to the besieged enclave, 10 will be released in the occupied West Bank, one in occupied East Jerusalem and 25 will either be sent to Gaza or Egypt.

In the southern city of Rafah in Gaza, Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud reported that Palestinians have been following the announcement of the releases closely.

“Today’s news is sending more optimism among the people,” he said while noting apprehension and concern in the past few days.

Al Jazeera’s Nour Odeh, reporting from Amman, Jordan, said the release of the three captives gives more hope to other Israeli families whose relatives are still being held in Gaza.

“For now, the ceasefire is holding. There is some hope. And the families of the Palestinians are waiting for the list of prisoners, who will be included and will see their loved ones tomorrow,” Odeh said on Friday. “Another sigh of relief for the mediators but radio silence from the Israeli government.”

So far, 21 captives, including 16 Israelis, have been released by Hamas since the ceasefire began on January 19.

After the release of  more captives, the ceasefire is expected to move to its second phase on March 1 although it is still unclear how that will proceed, Odeh noted.

During that phase, the release of Israeli soldiers is expected although the details have yet to be negotiated, she added.

Earlier this week, Hamas, citing Israel’s violation of the ceasefire terms, had threatened to delay the next release of captives. It said Israel failed to meet its obligations to allow shipments of tents and shelters into Gaza, among other alleged violations.

Israel, with the support of United States President Donald Trump, has said it would resume fighting if the captives were not freed as agreed, but it did not comment on the statement from Hamas.

Hamas said it held talks in Cairo with Egyptian officials and was in contact with Qatar’s prime minister about bringing in more shelters, medical supplies, fuel and heavy equipment for clearing the vast amounts of rubble in Gaza, its key demand in recent days. It said in a statement that the mediators had pledged to “remove all hurdles”.

Africa’s leaders must address weaponisation of rape in Sudan’s conflict

Today, African heads of states are convening on the margins of the African Union Summit in Addis Ababa to discuss Sudan’s devastating conflict and come up with strategies to try and put the country on a path to peace and stability.

It is no surprise that Sudan remains at the top of the continent’s agenda. Nearly two years into the war, with tens of thousands dead and millions displaced, the country is now the scene of one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises.

At the centre of this ever-growing crisis are Sudan’s women and girls, who are facing a multi-faceted threat due to the widespread weaponisation of rape within the conflict.

I have just returned from Renk, a town in neighbouring South Sudan where more than a million people fleeing the war, including women and girls who survived the worst imaginable acts of violence, have sought refuge.

In the narrow pathways between the makeshift tents they now call “home”, I spoke with many of them and listened to their stories of pain, loss and shattered dreams.

Afrah*, a fifteen-year-old girl whose youthful eyes carry a deep pain well beyond her years, bravely told me about a dark night in September that changed her life forever.

She said she was alone with her three siblings – aged seven, four and two – in their family home in Khartoum. The war was getting closer and closer, and her mother had left to try and get funds to arrange for the family’s escape South.

They first heard gunshots in the distance, and then witnessed armed men breaking into nearby houses, beating and shooting their neighbours.

Eventually, two of the men broke their front door down, searched the house and realised Afrah was alone with her siblings. They pointed a gun at her and ordered her brothers away, threatening to kill them all if she refused to obey their orders.

Then for almost two hours, they took turns to rape her. She said she tried to remain as silent as possible, fearing if she makes too much noise they may harm her brothers. The soldiers eventually left.

Afrah cleaned herself up, checked up on her siblings, and continued to wait for her mother’s return. When her mum made it back home a few hours later, and saw what soldiers had done to her neighbours, she was overwhelmed by grief. Afrah decided not to tell her what she endured to protect her from further suffering.

Afrah is just one of thousands of women and girls in Sudan who have experienced sexual violence at the hands of fighters. Indeed, rape has become a common weapon of war in Sudan. The perpetrators hardly ever face any accountability, while survivors are left to continue their lives, often in derelict refugee camps, with deep physical and psychological scars and no meaningful support.

Sudan’s war displaced more than 11 million people, including 5.8 million women and girls. Many of them have been subjected to sexual violence during the war, and they continue to face severe challenges in their places of refuge. Even those who made it into neighbouring countries, such as South Sudan and Chad, are not safe and properly cared for. They have little money or resources, and lack access to adequate healthcare. There is rarely anyone around to help them process and overcome their trauma.

In most cases, the only support available to these women are the few safe spaces created by NGOs where they can share their experiences with each other and receive basic medical care.

Women and girls like Afrah, who have endured the worst horrors of Sudan’s war, deserve protection and safety. Leaders meeting today in Addis Ababa must centre them in their discussions and take immediate action to ensure their long-term care and wellbeing. Caring for survivors is a crucial step in bringing this conflict to a definitive end – only when women and girls like Afrah are safe and cared for Sudan can begin to heal.

Today, Africa’s leaders must move beyond empty words and take concrete action to protect Sudan’s women and girls. They must pressure all parties to the conflict to respect international law, and ensure safe, unrestricted humanitarian access to all survivors of sexual violence. Those in positions of power have ignored the vicious weaponisation of rape in this conflict for too long. This is the time to act. Afrah and thousands of others like her are in urgent need of help. We must not ignore their plight.

* Name has been changed to protect confidentiality.

How does Daniel Levy run Tottenham – and would he ever leave?

A popular chant among match-going Tottenham fans at the moment is: “I don’t care about Levy, he doesn’t care about me, all I care about is Kulusevski.”

Prominent banners at the home defeat by Leicester last month read: “Our game is about glory, Levy’s game is about greed” and “24 years, 16 managers, 1 trophy – time for change”.

A crisis of about 30 separate injuries and poor form has left manager Ange Postecoglou exposed, irritable, and under pressure, with his side 14th in the Premier League and out of both domestic cups.

The debate about who or what is to blame for Spurs’ struggles is going round in circles. Alongside Manchester United’s failings and Manchester City’s decline, it has been one of the narratives of this season.

Fan anger has again been aimed at chairman Daniel Levy – vocalised in persistent ‘Levy out’ calls from supporters both home and away.

Club sources told BBC Sport the protests are “hurting” Levy, who attends almost every game and sits stoically through the criticism.

Tottenham were one of the busiest clubs in the January transfer window, but that has not satisfied some fans who criticise a recruitment policy mainly focused on under-21 players with potential resale value, and who regularly accuse Levy of acting too slowly in the market and putting profits above success on the pitch.

A ‘sit-down’ protest – led by a smaller supporter group called Change for Tottenham (CFT) – is planned against Levy before Sunday’s match against United.

Last week, the main fan group – the Tottenham Hotspur Supporters’ Trust (THST) – released “five core principles” they want to hold Levy to account on.

Among those principles were demands to “commit to winning” with investment; “attract and retain talent” with competitive wages; “develop elite youth talent”; “lead with integrity” to be “financially sustainable” while “keeping tickets affordable”; and engage with fans.

BBC Sport has spoken to several people on and off the record to try to understand the fuller picture of Levy’s Tottenham regime.

Some of the key points made were:

‘Most profitable club in Premier League history’

Getty Images

Football finance expert Kieran Maguire says any discussion of Levy’s tenure must be framed by Tottenham becoming the “most profitable club in Premier League history” because of the money their new stadium generates, a historically lower wage structure and a “degree of caution” on transfer spending.

He describes Spurs as a “superb cash-making machine” who have “outperformed any other club in England”.

Maguire outlined:

What is it like to work under Levy?

Daniel Levy and Ange Postecoglou at Tottenham Hotspur StadiumGetty Images

Club insiders describe Levy, 63, as “shy, quiet and hard-working” – and a man who “loves the club” and is affected by fan criticism. Multiple sources who know him have expressed respect for Tottenham’s progress under his leadership.

One source with knowledge of the inner workings of the club, who wished to remain anonymous, said Levy can be “very ruthless” but “genuinely wants the best for Spurs”.

They claimed some of the “own goals” – such as using the government furlough scheme during Covid in 2020 and more recently phasing out senior concession tickets – are partly because Levy does not “surround himself with the best people”.

They described the executive leadership and club board, which includes operations and finance director Matthew Collecott and executive director Donna-Maria Cullen, as “people too similar to him” who will “sit with their heads in their phones”, rather than “people who make up for [Levy’s] weaknesses”.

The source said Levy does not successfully deliver his messages about caring for the club because he is not a strong public speaker and chooses to avoid it, adding: “One interview or being visible once a year is not a lot.”

While Tottenham’s football structure has changed frequently, including technical directors, managing directors and heads of football operations, sources say the club rigidly sticks to “Levy’s philosophy and recruitment policy – to buy young players with promise who can add value”.

Another source who has worked with Levy in the Spurs hierarchy, also speaking anonymously, backed his passion for the club and said the idea the chairman does not care because he rarely shows emotion is “nonsense”.

Would Levy ever step aside?

Sources at the club believe Levy will step aside when he feels it is right for Tottenham.

They say he would not be motivated by vanity to stay on if there was an outright takeover – and the club remains open to investment with all future ownership structures on the table.

While Levy may be the focal point of protests, it was stressed that he is a minority shareholder of the club through his own family trust – and Enic, itself mostly owned by the Lewis family trust, remains the majority owner.

That means any change or purchase would need approval from the Lewis family, and there are other minority shareholders with a say.

During the current protests, the THST has expressed frustration but has not called for Levy to leave, unlike CFT, which is a smaller splinter group looking to apply pressure in internal fan politics and towards the club.

Other sources agreed the only realistic way in which Levy would leave Spurs would be on his own terms. He is the Premier League’s highest-paid chief executive – earning an estimated £50m-plus over his 25 years in charge.

This week a Guardian article reported potential interest in Tottenham from an unnamed Qatari consortium, although sources with knowledge of Spurs’ ownership situation played it down.

In 2023, when Paris St-Germain’s owners Qatari Sports Investment (QSI) were exploring the possibility of a minority stake in an English club, Tottenham were one of the teams linked. Levy maintains a close relationship with PSG and QSI chairman Nasser Al-Khelaifi.

Various reports in recent years have valued Tottenham at between £3.5bn and £4bn.

Chelsea were bought in a deal worth up to £4.25bn from Roman Abramovich in 2022 by a consortium led by American investor Todd Boehly and private equity firm Clearlake Capital. The purchase price was £2.5bn with a commitment to spending £1.75bn over the next 10 years.

Meanwhile, Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos bought a 25% stake in Manchester United for £1.03bn in December 2023 in a process which included a rival bid from Qatar’s Sheikh Jassim, reported to be nearer to £5bn for 100% of the club.

Despite those huge sums, both clubs – unlike Tottenham – need major investment in their stadiums to unlock bigger commercial earning potential.

According to the first source, the period when Tottenham were building their new £1.2bn stadium, between 2017 and 2019, meant Levy was “all-consumed” and the board “left everyone to do their jobs”.

Spurs secured Champions League football under Mauricio Pochettino for four successive seasons to 2018-19 – and were beaten in the 2019 final by Liverpool.

That source suggested Levy’s approach – namely “open to conversations but set in his ways” – has meant a lot of people with off-field expertise have left Spurs over the years for more influential jobs.

Paul Barber was an executive director between 2005-2010 and is now Brighton chief executive; Michael Edwards was Spurs’ chief analyst from 2009-2011 before leaving for Liverpool; FA technical director John McDermott was Tottenham’s head of academy and player development until 2020; while EFL chief executive Trevor Birch was – very briefly – Tottenham’s director of football operations, from September 2020 to January 2021.

It could be argued that many of these highly-rated executives enjoyed good careers at Tottenham before simply moving on – but the source claims they “left the building far too easily”.

Another source to have worked closely with Levy at Spurs, again speaking anonymously, pointed out he has delivered “a core infrastructure that is probably the best in the world” and suggested that would give the club “an incredible foundation for future success – probably after Daniel’s time”.

They said it had taken Arsenal 10 to 15 years to get back to competing for titles and regularly qualifying for Champions League football after they rebuilt their infrastructure, with Levy having inherited a dilapidated stadium, old training ground and ageing squad.

Does Levy lack football nous?

One criticism some fans have consistently aimed at Levy and Tottenham’s executive board is a lack of understanding of what it takes to succeed on the pitch.

Levy, Collecott and Cullen have worked together for a quarter of a century – one source described them as “the Holy Trinity to an extent” – with the chairman known to be “loyal to people loyal to him”.

They are supported at the top level by director of football administration and governance Rebecca Caplehorn and non-executive director Jonathan Turner.

The source said that in their experience at Tottenham there was no block on outside or different views, but it can be “hard” for newcomers especially those “without an affinity” to Spurs.

They added that Levy, Collecott, 56, and Cullen, 61 are “probably an unbreakable group” given their longevity and close relationships, but did stress they will not be at Tottenham “forever”.

It was suggested to BBC Sport that personal factors such as age and the trio’s own health or the health of relatives could lead them to “re-evaluate”.

Sources inside the club accepted the various backgrounds of people on Tottenham’s board mean they know more about business than football, but pointed out that another six-person board – which includes chief football officer Scott Munn and technical director Johan Lange – sits underneath to advise on all football decisions.

They will have a major say on any managerial appointments, while transfers are led by Lange and only finalised by Levy – with Munn running the rest of the football operation.

It is also felt that raising profits to record levels is the only way Tottenham can compete with teams like Man City and Newcastle and their ownership models.

Spurs sources feel they have been close to winning more trophies than just one trophy in the Enic/Levy era – having reached 15 semi-finals and six finals – and the five other clubs in the ‘traditional top six’ are either richer or bigger.

“We don’t make any apologies that we are trying to increase our revenue base to invest more in our teams if that means raising money through concerts to invest in the teams then I don’t apologise at all,” Levy said at September’s fan forum.

“We announced with our last results that we believe this club needs a bigger capital base because we’ve got a lot of exciting projects on the horizon and we want to make further investment in the teams. Some form of minority investment is what we’re looking for.”

In a further defence of Levy, one source pointed to fan discontent at Arsenal owner Stan Kroenke in 2019 and 2021, as well as Manchester United’s 12 months of troubles under new co-owner Ratcliffe.

They believe a “vocal minority” of fans simply want success now, but should be careful what they wish for with calls for change.

Related topics

  • Insight: In-depth stories from the world of sport
  • Premier League
  • Tottenham Hotspur
  • Football

Havertz injured hamstring blocking shot in training

Getty Images

Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta says Kai Havertz’s “unexpected” season-ending injury came when the striker blocked a shot during training.

The Germany forward will miss the remainder of the campaign after sustaining a hamstring injury during a winter training break in Dubai.

Havertz will have surgery on the issue and is not expected to return until pre-season.

“He was going to stop a shot after a set-piece and stretched the leg and he felt his hamstring,” Arteta said.

“We were having a great camp in Dubai, recharging, training, having some time off and connecting again with nature and a different environment.

“And then the injury happened in a very unexpected way, certainly. So it’s a big blow, obviously, because of the injuries that we have.

Havertz joins Gabriel Jesus, Bukayo Saka and Gabriel Martinelli on the sidelines, leaving Leandro Trossard, Raheem Sterling and teenager Ethan Nwaneri as the side’s only recognised forwards.

Arteta has had to deal with a number of injury issues throughout the season, with the likes of Ben White, Martin Odegaard and Riccardo Calafiori all missing lengthy spells.

In September, Manchester City captain Rodri said players were ‘close’ to going on strike to protest against the increase in matches due to revamped Uefa competitions and a Fifa Club World Cup.

A week later, he was ruled out for at least six months after rupturing his anterior cruciate ligament.

“We’ve had players who are injured who’ve played 130 games in the last two seasons so it’s an accident waiting to happen when you continue to load, load and load,” said Arteta.

“The intensity is at a different level and the demands in terms of minutes in this competitive environment is getting higher and higher and it’s a consequence of that.

“The amount of muscle and tendon injuries is higher than ever so there’s a relationship.

“We’re very limited and we’re training less than ever. There’s no time for training.”

With the transfer window now closed, Arteta says he would consider signing a free agent to ease the club’s injury crisis in attack.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Are there ‘more muscle injuries than ever’?

Ben Dinnery, founder of Premier Injuries, says there has been a reduction in injuries this season compared to the previous campaign.

“The narrative is that injuries are going through the roof this season, but they are actually not,” Dinnery told BBC Sport’s Football News Show.

“In terms of time loss absence we’ve actually seen a reduction season on season over the same period compared to 2023-24 by roughly 13%.”

However, Dinnery says there has been an increase in muscle injuries such as hamstring strains.

“I’s the type of injuries [getting more severe] and the length of return to play that is taking a little bit longer,” said Dinnery.

“When we took the 2023-24 season in isolation, looking at the previous four on average, we’ve seen an increase in hamstring injuries, certainly at the severe end, by about 65%.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Related topics

  • Premier League
  • Arsenal
  • Football