Archive January 27, 2026

‘Mother of all deals’: How India-EU trade deal creates $27 trillion market


New Delhi, India – India and the European Union have signed a free trade agreement that both sides have hailed as “the mother of all deals”.

The agreement, announced on Tuesday, came together over nearly two decades of intermittent negotiations and during a geoeconomic crisis triggered by United States President Donald Trump’s trade war.

The deal between India and the 27-nation EU covers about 2 billion people and represents a combined market of nearly $27 trillion and about 25 percent of the global gross domestic product (GDP).

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa joined Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi on Monday as honorary guests for Republic Day and its annual military parade.

“This agreement will bring major opportunities for the people of India and Europe,” Modi said while addressing an energy conference virtually on Tuesday before an India-EU summit.

“Europe and India are making history today,” von der Leyen wrote in a post on X. “We have created a free-trade zone of two billion people, with both sides set to benefit. We will grow our strategic relationship to be even stronger.”

The deal is expected to significantly reduce tariffs for India and the EU.

So what’s in the deal? And how will Trump – who slapped India with 50 percent tariffs last year in part as punishment for continuing to buy Russian oil – take it?

modi
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar sign an EU-India security and defence partnership on January 27, 2026 [Altaf Hussain/Reuters]

What does the deal cover, and how significant is it?

The deal is India’s largest and most comprehensive trade agreement and covers goods, services and investments across the EU’s customs union.

In 2023, the EU withdrew its generalised scheme of preferences (GSP) benefits for India, exposing its exporters to higher tariffs. The new deal, analysts noted, could give India an edge in several sectors, including textiles, pharmaceuticals, machinery, steel, petroleum products and electrical equipment.

Overall, the EU is giving India access to 144 services subsectors while India is opening 102 subsectors to the EU, including in the financial, maritime and telecommunications industries.

On Tuesday, Modi told Indian workers and industry leaders in sectors such as textiles, gems and jewellery that “the agreement will prove very helpful for you,” adding that it will not only boost manufacturing in India but will also expand India’s services sector.

“This free trade agreement will strengthen confidence in India for every business and every investor in the world. India is working extensively on global partnerships in all sectors,” Modi said.

The final draft of the trade agreement must still pass legal scrutiny in Brussels and New Delhi and may only become operational next year, said Biswajit Dhar, a trade economist who has been involved with multiple Indian trade negotiations.

Anil Trigunayat, a former Indian diplomat who has dealt with regional trading blocs, described the trade deal as “excellent, providing professional market access while taking care of the bureaucratic labyrinth of the EU”.

“Unlike 20 years ago, today India has the capacity to work together with the Europeans and provides a good market for them,” Trigunayat said. “There will be much more to look into other than cheaper wines or BMWs, including trade investments.”

“It’s a very significant deal for both India and the EU,” Dhar told Al Jazeera, “and a major step towards consolidating India’s trade and economic relations with its largest trade partner.”

Crucially, Dhar said, this deal represents an opportunity for both sides to “diversify and look beyond the US and grow beyond their dependence on the American market”.

bmw india
Cars made by Germany-based BMW, on sale in Mumbai, are now subject to high Indian tariffs, but those duties will fall dramatically under the trade pact [File: Francis Mascarenhas/Reuters]

Is India opening its much-protected automobile industry?

India has been criticised in the past for its protectionist approach to the automobile sector, including by Tesla owner Elon Musk. It has been levying tariffs as high as 110 percent on foreign vehicles.

Negotiations to reach a trade deal between India and the EU broke down in 2013 over New Delhi’s reluctance to open its automobile sector.

Under the deal announced on Tuesday, however, New Delhi will open its domestic automobile market to EU imports, slashing tariffs on most cars from the EU to 30 to 35 percent, which are to be then phased down to 10 percent over several years.

It is understood that EU cars priced below 15,000 euros ($17,800) are excluded from the deal and will remain subject to higher tariffs. Cars costing more than this will be divided into three categories, each with quotas and separate tariffs.

Electric vehicles, however, will be excluded from import duty reductions for the first five years to protect investments by domestic Indian electric car manufacturers.

After that, imports from the EU will be restricted to 160,000 internal combustion engines and 90,000 electric vehicles per year.

Despite these safeguards, shares in Indian carmakers dipped by about 1.6 percent after the announcement of the trade deal.

Ursula von der Leyen
Modi, von der Leyen and Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh attend the Republic Day parade in New Delhi on January 26, 2026 [Adnan Abidi/Reuters]

How will the deal benefit the EU?

Indian tariffs on 30 percent of goods imported from the EU will fall to zero immediately.

Overall, tariffs on 96.6 percent of EU goods exports to India will be eliminated or reduced, EU officials said. The deal will save up to 4 billion euros ($4.74bn) a year in duties on European products.

Besides the relaxation of tariffs on car imports from the EU, existing Indian tariffs of up to 44 percent on machinery, 22 percent on chemicals and 11 percent on pharmaceuticals will, for the most part, be eliminated.

Tariffs on EU aircraft and spacecraft will also be eliminated for almost all products while those on optical, medical and surgical equipment will be eliminated for 90 percent of products.

Meanwhile, spirits and wines imported to India from the EU, currently tariffed at 150 percent, will be cut to 20 to 30 percent for wines, 40 percent for spirits and 50 percent for beer.

India will also provide improved access for EU firms in financial and maritime services, and both sides will simplify customs rules and provide stronger intellectual property protections.

How will the deal benefit India?

The EU will scrap all tariffs on 90 percent of Indian goods, and within seven years, that will be extended to 93 percent of Indian goods.

Among those benefitting from zero tariffs immediately are marine/seafood products, such as shrimp and frozen fish (currently levied at up to 26 percent); chemicals (12.8 percent); plastics and rubber (6.5 percent); leather and footwear (17 percent); textiles (12 percent); apparel (4 percent); base metals (10 percent); and gems and jewellery (4 percent).

There will be partial tariff cuts and quotas for about 6 percent of Indian goods, bringing the EU’s average tariff rate down from 3.8 percent to 0.1 percent.

Overall, 99.5 percent of bilateral trade will benefit from some form of tariff concession.

India is still seeking improvements in tariff-free steel export quotas, and the outcome of these talks is due by June 30 before EU rules take effect on July 1. Under the deal as it stands, India would be allowed to export 1.6 million tonnes of steel to the EU duty-free, but this is only about half what it exports annually at present.

The EU has not granted India an exemption from its carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which taxes “carbon-intensive” goods – those that require large amounts of energy to produce, such as steel, cement, fertiliser and electricity.

Only countries that are associated with the EU, such as Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland are exempt from these due to their participation in the EU emissions trading system or related agreements. Countries whose emissions-trading systems are linked directly to the EU’s, such as Switzerland, are also exempt.

However, India will be able to negotiate this if the EU grants flexibility to another country.

How significant is India-EU trade now?

The US remains the biggest overall trading partner for both India and the EU.

However, over the past decade, goods trade between India and the EU has grown substantially, rising from about $74bn in 2020 to $136bn in 2024-2025, making the EU India’s largest goods trading partner.

India has a favourable trade surplus with the EU of more than $15bn as its exports of $75.85bn outpace imports of $60.68bn.

EU exports are heavy on machinery, transport equipment and chemicals while India mostly exports chemicals, base metals, mineral products and textiles.

The two sides hope to increase that to about $200bn by 2030.

From 2019 to 2024, India-EU trade in services also grew with Indian exports rising from $22.5bn to $44bn while EU exports increased from about $17bn to $34bn. The two mainly trade in business consulting and IT services.

India is the EU’s ninth largest trading partner, accounting for 2.4 percent of its total trade, compared with 17.3 percent for the US and 14.6 percent for China.

As of 2024, 931,607 Indians resided in the EU, according to the Indian government. Comparative figures for EU citizens living in India are not available.

The EU says about 6,000 European companies operate in India while about 1,500 Indian companies have a presence in the EU.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are pictured in a mirror as they attend a joint press conference at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard
US President Donald Trump and Modi are pictured in a mirror at a joint news conference at the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025 [Nathan Howard/Reuters]

Do both economies have tensions with the US?

Yes, on several fronts.

Despite Modi having relatively good relations with the US president, India is one of the countries most heavily tariffed by the US – at 50 percent on goods – as a result of Trump’s trade war. Half of that is punishment for India’s continued purchase of Russian crude oil, which White House officials said is financing the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine.

EU tensions with the Trump administration have been building as well, particularly over Trump’s insistence that the US be allowed to buy Greenland, which is a territory of EU member Denmark.

This month, Trump threatened additional tariffs of 10 percent – rising to 25 percent in June – against eight European countries that had objected to Trump’s demand to buy Greenland. Both Greenland and Denmark have repeatedly stated that the island, which is politically part of Europe but is geographically located in North America, is not for sale.

However, during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last week, Trump walked back this threat and said he would not impose tariffs. Instead, he said, constructive talks had laid the basis for a framework of an agreement over Greenland.

The EU is still subject to up to 15 percent tariffs by the US under an EU-US trade deal signed last year.

Experts said the finalisation of the India-EU trade agreement has been expedited, in part, in response to this pressure from the Trump administration.

“The global trade disruptions have become a norm, and there is an urgent necessity for both [India and the EU] to provide a certain degree of certainty to their businesses,” Dhar said. “The US is mired in uncertainty, and one just doesn’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow.”

How will the US react to the India-EU trade deal?

The White House has already criticised the agreement.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent lashed out at the EU over the pact with New Delhi. “We have put 25 percent tariffs on India for buying Russian oil. Guess what happened last week? The Europeans signed a trade deal with India,” Bessent told ABC News on Sunday.

“They [the Europeans] are financing the war against themselves,” he added.

While the EU signed a trade deal with the US fairly quickly after Trump announced his trade war last year, New Delhi is still trying to negotiate one with Washington. It is also seeking to diversify trade to other parts of the world.

“India has taken a policy of strategic patience [in dealing with Trump’s trade war],” Trigunayat said. “The deal with the EU is part of the same process to cushion the impact and find new partners.”

Harsh Pant, vice president of the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think tank, told Al Jazeera: “You have two big economic players coming together, which is a signal to the US that they are willing to move forward with their own agenda.”

Iran’s currency drops to record low against dollar as tensions soar


Iran’s currency has dropped to ⁠a record ‍1,500,000 rials to ‍the US ⁠dollar, according to several Iranian ​currency ‌tracking websites, weeks after protests ‌sparked by ‌the ⁠rial’s dwindling value rocked ‌the country.

Exchange shops on Tuesday offered the record-low rial-to-dollar rate in Tehran, deepening the economic hardship for large swaths of the Iranian populace suffering from decades of extensive economic mismanagement and international sanctions.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Iran’s newly appointed ‍Central Bank Governor Abdolnaser Hemmati said that “the foreign exchange market is following its natural course.”

This latest dip comes nearly a month after shopkeepers in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar shut their stores in protest against the falling value of the rial, hyperinflation and a government decision to end certain food and fuel subsidies.

The demonstrations that began in the capital on December 28 quickly spread across the country, with protesters demanding political change. They were met by a violent crackdown by Iranian security forces, the scale of which is only starting to become clear as the country faced more than two weeks of internet blackout – the most comprehensive in its history.

Iran’s government said at least 3,117 people were killed in the unrest, saying 2,427 were civilians and security forces, and labelled the rest “terrorists.”

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which verifies each death with a network of activists in Iran, put the death toll at 5,777 protesters, 214 government-affiliated forces, 86 children and 49 civilians who were not participating in the demonstrations.

Iranian state media accused forces abroad of escalating the protests as Tehran remains unable to address the country’s ailing economy, squeezed by international sanctions over its nuclear programme.

Economic instability has also been fuelled by spiralling tensions with the US and Israel. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the situation with Iran was “in flux” after he ordered what he described as a “big armada” to the region.

On Monday, the USS Abraham Lincoln, and the guided missile destroyers accompanying it, entered the US Central Command’s “area of responsibility”, marking a significant escalation in the US military posture near Iran.

Two Iranian-aligned armed groups in the Middle East have signalled their willingness to launch new attacks, likely trying to back Iran after Trump threatened military action over the killing of protesters. Gulf Arab states said they want to stay out of any attack, despite hosting US military personnel.

At the same time, Trump stressed diplomacy remains an option. “They want to make a deal. I know so. They called on numerous occasions. They want to talk.”

Iraq presidential vote delayed as Kurdish blocs struggle to pick candidate

The election for Iraq’s next president has been postponed in order for more consultation between the two Kurdish parties to come to a decision.

The Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) requested a delay in the parliamentary vote scheduled for Tuesday, according to the Iraqi News Agency (INA).

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

According to a sectarian quota system, the prime minister’s position is held by a Shia, the parliament’s speaker is a Sunni, and the presidency is largely ceremonial for Kurds.

A PUK member typically assumes the presidency in accordance with a deal reached between the two main Kurdish parties. The KDP selects the region’s president and regional leader, in contrast, from the region’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region.

However, the KDP chose Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein as the primary candidate in this instance.

Whoever is nominated by the two Kurdish parties still needs the support of the Shia and Sunni blocs in the parliament, according to Al Jazeera’s Mahmoud Abdelwahed, who is based in Baghdad.

The new president will have 15 days to choose a prime minister, presumably Nouri al-Maliki’s former leader, after the election.

Al-Maliki, 75, has previously served as Iraq’s prime minister for two terms, including two terms in 2006 and 2014. He abruptly resigned under American pressure. He is perceived as having ties to Iran.

Maliki was approved by the Coordination Framework, a coalition of Shia parties with a majority in parliament on Saturday. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned against an Iraqi pro-Iranian government the following day.

Washington “has conveyed to it a negative view of previous governments led by former prime minister Maliki,” according to an Iraqi source close to the coordination framework.

The United States will make its own sovereign decisions regarding the next government, according to US representatives in a letter.

Another Iraqi source confirmed the letter, noting that Maliki was confident that Washington’s concerns would be addressed by the Shia alliance, which had continued to advance with its decision.

Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ puts rights abusers in charge of global order

The Trump administration has worked diligently to undermine the UN, particularly its efforts to uphold universal human rights, since taking office a year ago. Donald Trump, the current US president, wants to form a “Board of Peace,” with himself as the chairman forever. While many nations were invited, those signing up appear to be a rogues’ gallery of leaders and governments with varying levels of appalling human rights records.

In order to stop another World War II crime against humanity and genocide, the United States was instrumental in founding the UN in 1945. The US has always had a love-hate relationship with the UN, always being wary of perceived threats to its autonomy. However, the Trump administration has criticized what it perceives as “anti-American” and “hostile agendas,” insisting on the hate and displacing the love.

Numerous vital UN programs have been ignored and underfunded by the administration. Additionally, a significant portion of the assessed contributions, which member states are required to pay, has been withheld. The administration has discontinued funding the UN population fund, which supports and defends women and girls in armed conflicts and crisis zones, and has withdrawn from the UN World Health Organization, UN climate bodies, and international climate agreements.

In UN negotiations, US negotiators have pushed Trump’s ideological agenda and demanded that some of the language used in statements and resolutions be removed. Because the Trump administration views them as “woke” or politically correct, the UN diplomats claim that targeted language includes words like “gender,” “diversity,” and “climate.” The administration has had a few successes with its ideological campaign in the UN Security Council, but it has had a difficult time in the General Assembly, where the US is one of 193 members without a veto and has had some success.

The administration appears to be determined to reincarnate the Security Council in a Trumpian manner, though. According to the proposed charter of the Board of Peace, it is “an international organization that seeks to promote stability, restore dependable and lawful governance, and ensure enduring peace in areas affected or threatened by conflict.”

The Russian and Chinese governments, which have worked tirelessly for years to de-emphasize human rights at the UN, are undoubtedly hearing something about human rights because the charter doesn’t mention them.

According to the $1 billion fee for permanent membership, Trump’s board appears to be a sort of pay-to-play, global club. It’s difficult to imagine this body prioritize ending suffering, hatred, and bloodshed, as Trump remarked at the World Economic Forum’s launch event on the sidelines of the forum. There are several well-known human rights abusers and leaders who have been linked to war crimes. Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, and Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, are two of the people Trump has invited to join. Both of them are facing international criminal court (ICC) arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Trump has invited leaders from China, Belarus, and Kazakhstan to his board, each with their own appalling human rights records.

According to the charter, Trump would have the power to “adopt resolutions or other directives” as chairman of the board.

Hungary and Bulgaria are the only European Union members who have so far ratified joining. Viktor Orban, Hungary’s far-right populist prime minister, has long supported Trump. Trump threatened to significantly raise French wine and champagne tariffs in response to French President Emmanuel Macron’s refusal to accept a position.

Trump also gave Canada a seat on the board that was a permanent one. However, he withdrew the offer following Davos speech by Prime Minister Mark Carney. Carney sharply criticised the use of economic coercion by great powers against smaller nations while not mentioning Trump or the US. Carney urged middle-class nations to unite and combat bullying from great powers.

Following an additional two years of Israeli forces’ atrocities that left at least 70, 000 Palestinians dead, with whom the US was associated, the Board of Peace was originally intended to be in charge of Gaza’s administration. Gaza is not mentioned in the board’s charter. However, Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, led a side event at Davos that focused on Gaza. The “Gaza Executive Board,” a subsidiary of the Board of Peace, will consist of Kissner.

Kushner gave the impression of a “New Gaza,” complete with glittering office buildings and pristine beaches crowded with people. Tony Blair, the Trump negotiator Steve Witkoff, and senior Türkish and Qatari officials make up the Gaza Executive Board, which is unoccupied.

Governments should collaborate to uphold international human rights, humanitarian law, the rule of law, and accountability rather than handing out $1 billion checks to Trump. They should use all available resources to combat unfair US actions, including Trump’s sanctions against prominent Palestinian human rights organizations, ICC judges, and UN special rapporteurs. They should demand answers from all warring parties, whether in Gaza, Sudan, Ukraine, Myanmar, or anywhere else.

Anything less would put Trump in danger of winning and would make it easier for him and his board to support the UN and other important international organizations. The UN has its issues, including those relating to the protection of human rights. However, it is still worthwhile to strengthen rather than to replace it with an allies of war criminals and rights violators.