Archive July 18, 2025

Cancel culture strikes again for Love Island contestants – but does it really work?

Is it truly fair to punish people for their past errors because being “canceled” has become a public ritual? In digital form, we examine cancel culture, public accountability, and what it means to be “forgotten.”

Can cancel culture be justified?(Image: Getty Images)

Being ‘cancelled’ has almost become the norm for those in the public eye. From musicians and influencers to even politicians, very few manage to escape unscathed once old tweets and controversial comments resurface – leading to job losses or a decline in fans, no matter how long ago they were made or how much they claim to have grown since.

In the past few weeks, Love Island contestants have found themselves in the firing line over derogatory and racist comments. First it was Yulissa Escobar, kicked off the US version of the show just two days after a video of her using the N‑word resurfaced online. Then fellow contestant came Cierra Ortega was removed from the show after an old picture surfaced showing her using a slur.

Back in the UK, old tweets by contestant Helena Ford recently came to light, including one from over 10 years ago, which read: “All I can hear are these f**king foreign dickheads.” Viewers have called for ITV to remove her, yet she remains in the villa.

READ MORE: Love Island’s Helena Ford accused of sharing offensive tweet as post resurfaces

Helena
Fans were calling for Helena to be removed from the show(Image: ITV/Shutterstock)

However, reality TV contestants are not the only ones. Millions of people actively participate in cancel culture online, even as they question whether it has gone too far, as both a tool of accountability and a source of conflict for many.

Is cancel culturejustifiable?

Many people think that cancel culture is a recent development, while others even attribute it to an overly “sensitive” generation. However, the concept of excluding someone for bad behavior dates back as far as the 1990s.

However, the term “cancel culture” gained traction in the mid-2010s, particularly as a result of the #MeToo movement, which saw a rise in sexual harassment and assault charges in the media.

In a 2024 study published in Acta Psychological, researchers Cheselle Jan L. Roldan, Ardvic Kester S. Ong and Dhonn Q. Tomas explored how Gen Z engage with cancel culture.

According to them, “Cancel culture places a spotlight on issues like sexism, racism, and abuse,” which might encourage or push people to become aware of the seriousness and specificities of the issue.

However, they also cautioned against “cancel culture easily turns into cyberbullying, especially for teenagers, as the act may narrow the way to empathy and forgiveness for the errant individual or organization.”

Can you cancel culture?

Cancel culture attempts to hold those responsible for harm, but it fails to always achieve its goals, especially when those responsible have wealthy, powerful fans, or well-known brands behind them.

Take J.K. Rowling, who faced backlash for her views on transgender people. Yet the Harry Potter franchise continues to generate significant revenue. Rowling is even working on the new TV adaption of the popular series.

Continue reading the article.

And sometimes, fans choose to completely reject the artist’s legacy, regardless of their own opinions.

The internet is truly forgetful.

The notion that “the internet never forgets” is untrue isn’t it entirely? Individuals in the UK have the right to be forgotten under the GDPR law, also known as the “right to erasure,” which enables them to request the removal of their personal data in certain circumstances.

Myanmar military claims recapture of strategic town from rebel force

Following a yearlong battle close to Myanmar’s main army training academy, the military government claimed to have removed rebel fighters and recaptured a town. This marked a rare turnaround for the government in the country’s northeast.

The Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) had previously controlled the town of Nawnghkio in Shan State, and the ruling military announced this on Thursday.

The strategically significant town, which is situated on a crucial highway connecting central Myanmar to China, was taken over by the Three Brotherhood Alliance in July 2024.

The military government claimed to have retaken Nawnghkio after “566 armed engagements within 11 operational months” in a statement released by the state-run Global New Light of Myanmar. Soldiers were pictured holding rifles aloft in a rare one-page spread in a rare newspaper. It provided a detailed account of the conflict, citing initial events that officers and enlisted men “sacrificing their lives” led to.

However, the military “combined strategic ground military tactics with strategic air military tactics,” according to the report.

Nawnghkio is located 40 kilometers (25 miles) from Mandalay, Myanmar’s second-largest city, and 80 kilometers (50 miles) from Pyin Oo Lwin, the town where the country’s main military officer training academy is located.

The TNLA stated in a statement that the military government’s victory had been denied, stating only that “the heavy offensive has made it difficult to continue administrative work in the town.” The TNLA added that “civil administration services have been relocated to secure locations”

Analysts claim that the military government’s control over large population centers is secure because it has an air force that can halt large-scale rebel advances, despite the combined rebel offensive against government forces having already begun in October 2023.

Northeastern Lashio city was also taken by the rebels in April, but a deal with China brokered its release was what gave it back to the ruling military.

A myriad of pro-democracy armed groups and ethnic rebel armies have joined forces to fight military rule in Myanmar since a military coup in 2021 toppled the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi.

South Korea to end private adoptions after inquiry finds abuse rife

After a troubling investigation revealed that South Korea’s government-endorsed foreign adoption program violated the fundamental human rights of adoptees, it is set to end the decades-old practice of outsourcing adoptions to private agencies.

According to the South Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, the country’s government will adopt a “newly restructured public adoption system” on Saturday, in which state and local governments assume full control over the entire adoption process.

Following the devastating Korean War of 1950-1953, when inter-country adoption was encouraged as a solution, South Korea sent more than 140, 000 children overseas.

A&nbsp, Truth and Reconciliation Commission investigations revealed earlier this year that the adoption process had been plagued by irregularities, including “fraudulent orphan registrations, identity tampering, and inadequate vetting of adoptive parents.”

The Health Ministry continued, “The new change is a significant step toward ensuring the safety and upholding the rights of adopted children.”

Important decisions will be made by a ministry committee in accordance with the new system, such as matching prospective adoptive parents with children and ensuring the child’s best interests are protected by the “best interests of the child.”

Prior to now, this was handled by significant adoption agencies, which had no control over the state. The government was held responsible for the problems, particularly the failure to regulate adoption fees, which transformed the sector into one based on profit.

The government now assumes full responsibility for ensuring the safety and rights of all adopted children, according to Kim Sang-hee, director of population and child policy at the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

After the Korean War, international adoption was established to bring mixed-race children to a nation that valued ethnic homogeneity.

In the 1970s and 1980s, it overcame post-war poverty and experienced rapid and aggressive economic growth, leading to millions of dollars in international adoption efforts.

The new measure, according to activists, is only a starting point and is insufficient.

While I believe it’s time to end all private adoption organizations in Korea, I don’t believe that letting the state handle new ones suffices, writes author Lisa Wool-Rim Sjoblom, a Swedish adoptee from Korea.

According to Sjoblom, the government should prioritize implementing the findings of the truth commission, issue an official apology, and support the tens of thousands of Koreans who were adopted abroad, according to Sjoblom.

Dukes to examine ‘soft’ cricket balls – what is going on?

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 464 Comments

After the first three Tests were troubled by issues, the manufacturer will examine the balls used in the series between England and India.

Due to their disconcerting wear and tear, the Dukes’ balls have been frequently changed.

By the end of the week, Dukes will receive as many used balls as possible from the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB).

Owner of British Cricket Balls Ltd., Dilip Jajodia, told BBC Sport, “We will take it away, inspect, and then start talking to the tanner, talking about all of the raw materials – everything.”

What exactly is the issue?

The host board chooses the ball for test matches. The Dukes are played in England, while the Kookaburra is used in Australia and the Tests are played with a SG ball.

The Dukes, which have been in production since 1760, have long been regarded as a high-quality product, but there have been issues with Test and county cricket in recent years.

After 80 overs of an innings, the ball has been going soft, and taking wickets becomes more difficult when it goes soft. Bowlers claim that fielders’ edges are less compressed and that the pitch has not lost the same zip.

Data collected during the entire season is analyzed by the ECB’s Professional Game Committee and Cricket Advisory Group. As well as reports from captains and umpires, this would include the number of balls that had changed.

In recent years, discussions have been sparked by concerns about the quality of balls, and there are more instances of balls becoming softer more quickly. However, this problem only sporadically emerged during England’s third Test against India at Lord’s.

England’s first innings saw five ball changes, with one only changing after ten overs on the second morning.

Former England international bowler Stuart Broad argued that the cricket ball should be “like a fine wicketkeeper – barely noticed.”

The ball is a big deal to us, and it almost always gets changed because it is. Unacceptable .

What is the issue’s root cause?

The Dukes’ production process is still a traditional one.

Cork is still used to make them, is wound in string, is cased in leather, and is joined by a hand-stitched seam. Further variation is also made by dipping the cow hides in dye, which provides the leather.

According to Jajodia, there may be a number of factors at play.

One is the natural raw materials that need to be molded and assembled by a human being, he said.

The leather that holds the entire thing together is undoubtedly the most important component of a cricket ball, and if the fibers that make up the animal skin have a weakness or inherent issue, we can only discover it if it fails after thorough inspection and investigation.

Covid did have a very significant impact on various businesses, he continued.

“Personal behavior should change throughout the entire tanning process, regardless of whether they have passed away or deemed it to be too challenging.

Additionally, it might be that some of the chemicals are no longer available due to businesses closing down. The cattle themselves could be the culprits, or the processes could be.

There isn’t a choice because there is a tanner left that practically makes cricket ball leather. Working with the tannery is a must to ensure that they generally produce what you want.

Jajodia also thinks that the more recent game, which has bigger bats, more sixes, and more difficult playing surfaces, may be a contributing factor.

According to him, “the unique nature of cricket is that you can’t test that ball before it goes into play,” and that means that if it fails, it will fail in use and at its worst possible level in the glare of publicity.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

What is possible?

According to Jajodia, who accepts that may not be popular, that a new ball should be given to the bowling sides should be done after 65 overs rather than 80 as a possible solution.

We’ve had three Test matches, he said, and they’ve all been good ones. They’ve been interesting games,” they said.

We shouldn’t be expecting drastic and dramatic changes, but rather, we should be cautious.

This product has been in existence since 1760. You can only go through the routine of everything you do and try to identify yourself because there is no quick fix for this.

Of course, the ECB has other options. Their agreement with Dukes is renewed on an annual basis, and they do not have a fixed contract with them.

In county 2nd XI cricket, Gunn &amp uses a hand-stitched ball. In the event that Dukes is ever required, one of the benefits of this is to provide a substitute.

The Kookaburra has been the subject of controversies since 2023 when it first appeared in the County Championship. The England team initiated this innovation to aid in bowlers’ overseas preparation.

An average of 1, 194. 66 runs were scored per match in the two rounds of Championship cricket that were already played this year using the Kookaburra, a significant increase.

The Kookaburra’s ineffectiveness in this country may be due to its preference for the softer pitches in the UK as opposed to the southern hemisphere’s harder surfaces.

“I can assure you that we are always on the case,” Jajodia said.

“I spend my entire life making these balls, and I personally choose the balls for each game,” he said. They are wonderful.

related subjects

  • Cricket

Syrian forces to redeploy to Suwayda; Israel targets Bedouin convoy

According to a spokesperson for the Syrian Interior Ministry, Syrian security forces are preparing to relocate to Suwayda to end fighting between the Druze and Bedouin tribes.

According to Israel’s public broadcaster Kan News, Israel has previously warned the Syrian government to leave the country and its forces attacked a convoy of Bedouin fighters on Syria’s Palmyra-Homs highway on Friday, according to Israel’s public broadcaster Kan News.

Two days prior to Israel’s massive attacks on Damascus, this is reported.

Despite the withdrawal of Syrian government forces from the southwest of Suwayda and an attempt by Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa to draw a line amid recent weeks of deadly violence that has left hundreds of people dead, Bedouin fighters in Syria said they have launched a new offensive against Druze fighters late on Thursday.

The fighters were attempting to free Bedouins, according to a Bedouin military commander who told Reuters news agency that the truce only applied to government forces and not to them. Druze armed groups have detained these people in recent days.

According to the Kan report, Bedouin fighters have recently managed to reach the Suwayda region, which supports earlier rumours from Arabic-language news media.

In response to attempts to impose a ceasefire between Bedouin and Druze fighters, Syria’s leadership has condemned Israel’s attacks as a violation of its sovereignty.

Israel’s recent bombing of Syria was justified by the claim that it was protecting the Druze minority. However, the country has more selfish motivations.

Israel has long attacked Syria, even prior to the most recent Druze-related violence.

Israel has attacked Syria hundreds of times and invaded and occupied the region’s territory, excluding the western Golan Heights, which it has occupied since 1967, including the 14-year conflict that resulted in the removal of long-time leader Bashar al-Assad.

Leading Israeli analysts speculate that the Israeli government’s and its troubled prime minister’s personal and political goals may have been the cause of these recent attacks rather than their concern for the welfare of the Druze.

Israel launched its own attacks on Syria on Wednesday, striking the Ministry of Defense, and close to the presidential palace in Damascus, leading to the most recent reports of violence. The ceasefire was reached on Wednesday, however.

In a televised speech on Thursday, Al-Sharaa declared that taking control of Suwayda’s security was important in order to stop sectarian conflict there and stop Israel from attacking. He also stated that defending the country’s Druze citizens and their rights.

One of the spiritual leaders of the Syrian Druze community, Sheikh Hikmat Al Hijri, said, “We are not sectarian, and we have never wanted to cause division.” Anyone who compromises security and stability bears full responsibility for our entire situation. We disagree that anyone who commits sabotage or incitement only represents themselves, and that any sect or region can be held responsible for their actions.

Qatar, Turkiye, and the US were both condemned for saying they did not support Israeli strikes.

In a phone conversation with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani criticized Israel’s recent attacks on Syria.

The emir called Israel’s bombing of Syria “a flagrant violation” of the nation’s sovereignty, international law, the UN Charter, and a threat to regional stability, according to a statement released by Sheikh Tamim’s office on Friday.

After Israel’s actions sought to “sabotage” a ceasefire in the country, Turkiye president Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday that the country would not allow division to occur in Syria or that its multicultural structure and territorial integrity would be endangered.

According to the presidency, Erdogan and al-Sharaa, the president of Turkey and al-Sharaa spoke about Israel’s attacks on Damascus during a phone call on Thursday, adding that Erdogan had expressed support for Damascus.

Following Israeli airstrikes against Damascus, Turkiye was instrumental in ensuring a ceasefire in Syria. A Turkish security source reported on Thursday that Turkish intelligence officials spoke with the Syrian Druze leader.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce has stated that the Syrian government should take the lead in the wake of the country’s condemnation of violence.

She stated on Thursday that “we are engaging diplomatically with Israel and Syria at the highest levels to address the current crisis and reach a lasting agreement between the two sovereign states.”

The US “did not support recent Israeli strikes,” according to Bruce, adding that “regarding Israel’s intervention and activity” in Syria.

Resilience, luck and subs – England’s winning formula

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

  • 408 Comments

They couldn’t, couldn’t they?

England and Sweden reached quarter-finals at Euro 2025 with 2-0, but they did manage to score two goals in as many minutes to level the score.

Chloe Kelly scored in the shootout, Sweden goalkeeper Jennifer Falk headed home with a penalty of her own, and Hannah Hampton, their opposite, denied Sofia Jakobsson.

Sweden exposed the defensive weaknesses of England once more, but Sarina Wiegman, England manager, made the necessary changes in Zurich.

As England qualified for a semi-final against Italy on Tuesday, it was a tale of resilience, good fortune, and an incredible impact of the “super-subs.” Sound quaint to you?

They have turned out to be positive characteristics of England’s major tournament journeys, with resilience, resilience, and resilience, when key players were missing, helping them reach the final of the 2023 World Cup.

That togetherness and fighting back is a trait that this team possesses so admirably. It demonstrates a lot of resilience,” manager Wiegman said.

“We modified it and added more players,” she said. In that particular situation, they really helped the team.

They “do whatever is necessary,” they say.

No matter what the score, Wiegman’s rotations always made a difference in the second half of the 2022 season.

She backed her players in delivering the game plan and assigned the same starting XI for each of her six matches.

In Switzerland, Wiegman’s selection remained unchanged for a third successive match, with her first substitution coming in the 70th minute against Sweden.

Sweden’s pace had carved out a unique start for England, but Hampton, who made important saves after the break, kept them under pressure.

Johanna Rytting Kaneryd’s conflict with Defender Jess Carter had forced her to switch to the right-sided centre-back position.

England trailed 2-0 to Sweden, who were brutally persistent and had their fans singing ABBA songs.

Wiegman could probably switch things up at halftime, right? She might not be able to handle Sweden’s directness. England must have had a plan B, right?

However, Wiegman’s plan is frequently successful because she hasn’t ever swayed from it.

Things changed with the additions of Kelly, Beth Mead, Michelle Agyemang, and Esme Morgan.

England was unapologetically at the forefront. Lucy Bronze, a defender, headed in Kelly’s deep cross into the back post, and 103 seconds later Agyemang made it 2-2.

More than any other team, England scored via a substitute at Euro 2025 for the third time.

This team is simply incredible, I don’t know why. When Wiegman asked how her side remained resilient despite setbacks, she said, “They stick together.”

The players came together, accepted responsibility, and took action to improve the game that we had against France.

That resilience is what defines her, she says.

Getty Images

As those who scored to Wiegman’s right sang her name as England trailed 2-0, the fans may have had doubts, but they did not display it at Stadion Letzigrund.

England still relyed heavily on luck when things eventually started to turn out.

As extra time passed, the ball didn’t quite drop for Sweden on set-pieces, and momentum started to wane for England.

However, Sweden had the final say in the shootout. They both had good luck, and they won by themselves with penalties.

Before Hampton dived low to save Jakobsson’s spot-kick, Sweden goalkeeper Falk wasted the first chance by blasting the ball over the crossbar.

England’s most experienced player was prepared to take her moment as Sweden’s senior players wasted their opportunities.

When it mattered, 33-year-old Bronze, who is currently playing in her seventh major tournament, delivered.

She took a deep breath, thumped her penalty, and headed into the roof of the net, an example of England’s resilience.

As she watched the supporters behind the goal, a roar came out as she ripped off the tape she had worn to herself during the match.

She kicked the hoardings behind the same net about 30 minutes earlier, causing a surge of emotion as she spearheaded England’s comeback.

“Lucy was chaotic in herself, alright? She had a lot going on, really. She became a physio, she became a striker, and she was awarded the game’s best penalty, according to teammate Mead.

“In those circumstances, Lucy really showed her experience,” she said. She is our most accomplished English player, and I believe she was one of the few players who truly inspired us all today.

Wiegman acknowledged she was “really concerned” that England were heading for trouble after failing to convert four penalties.

However, it was appropriate that Bronze assisted in advancing her team.

She is unique, not a piece of cake. This is something I haven’t seen before in my life. What she does and her attitude have affected me as a working with so many incredible football players, Wiegman said.

related subjects

  • Women’s Football Team England
  • Women’s EURO 2016: UEFA
  • Football
  • Women’s Football