Archive November 26, 2025

It raised eyebrows, but probably didn’t come as a huge surprise. Cristiano Ronaldo is available to play for Portugal in their opening matches at the World Cup, despite his red card against the Republic of Ireland.

Why? Because Fifa decided to suspend for one year the final two matches of his suspension.

Under Fifa’s disciplinary code for violent conduct, Ronaldo should have received a three-match ban for elbowing Dara O’Shea during Portugal’s 2-0 qualifying defeat earlier this month.

Yet Fifa’s disciplinary committee said it took into account that he had not received a red card in his other 225 international appearances.

He served one match in the final qualifier against Armenia. The other two will only be activated if he “commits another infringement of a similar nature and gravity during the probationary period”.

So Ronaldo is free to join arch rival Lionel Messi at the World Cup in the United States, Mexico and Canada next summer.

In short, yes. There is a clause in the disciplinary code which effectively gives Fifa the right to cut or cancel any ban as it sees fit.

Article 27 says Fifa can “fully or partially suspend” a disciplinary measure for “a probationary period of one to four years”.

There has not been a World Cup reprieve quite the same as Ronaldo’s, where a three-match ban has remained in place but partially suspended.

But there several other examples of Fifa looking kindly upon players, reducing their ban from the mandatory punishment.

The World Cup finals are the pinnacle of most players’ careers. Articles 25 and 27 give Fifa the freedom to consider the merits and impact of a suspension. And it’s not only been about star players.

In 2014, France defender Laurent Koscielny was sent off for slapping Ukraine’s Oleksandr Kucher in the first leg of the World Cup play-off.

Like Ronaldo, Koscielny was automatically banned for his country’s final qualifying fixture. Fifa then chose not to extend the Arsenal centre-back’s suspension beyond one match, allowing him to play at the World Cup.

Croatia’s Mario Mandzukic should have missed the opening two games of the 2014 finals after he was sent off for serious foul play in the second leg of the play-off win over Iceland.

Fifa gave him a one-game ban, meaning he could play the second match against Cameroon – a 4-0 win in which he scored twice.

Towards the end of qualifying for the 2006 World Cup, Netherlands midfielder Phillip Cocu was sent off for an alleged retaliatory elbow on an Albania player.

Fifa chose to ban Cocu for two matches, meaning he missed the final Uefa qualifiers against the Czech Republic and Macedonia, but was free for the opening match of the World Cup.

Japan’s Makoto Hasebe was sent off for an elbow at the end of qualifying for the 2010 World Cup, and like Cocu was given two matches. He was not so lucky, however, as the second match was the first game of the World Cup.

Likewise, Iran’s Saeid Ezatolahi was sent off for bringing his boot down on the head of an opponent in their penultimate qualifier. Fifa chose to give the midfielder two games rather than three, and he missed just the first game at the 2018 World Cup.

In 2002, Mexico midfielder Jesus Arellano was given a three-match ban for violent conduct against Costa Rica. He missed the final qualifier against Honduras and was set to sit out the first two matches of the World Cup.

England midfielder Lauren James was sent off at the 2023 Women’s World Cup for standing on the back of Nigeria’s Michelle Alozie.

James feared she would get a three-match suspension, meaning she would be ruled out for the remainder of the tournament.

But Fifa decided to give James two games and she was able to return as a substitute in England’s 1-0 final defeat by Spain.

England also had success with Wayne Rooney’s suspension for Euro 2012.

The Manchester United striker was given a three-match ban for kicking Miodrag Dzudovic during a 2-2 draw with Montenegro in the final qualifier.

There are a few cases, and players who are sent off in their last competitive game before the finals will always miss at least one game.

At the 2006 World Cup, Germany striker Mike Hanke was very unlucky.

A year earlier, Hanke had been sent off for serious foul play against Mexico in the third-place play-off at the Confederations Cup.

Germany didn’t have another competitive game for a whole year, as hosts of the 2006 World Cup, but Fifa stuck with the mandatory two-match ban.

Hanke was still picked for the squad even though he was suspended, and made one 19-minute appearance – ironically in another third-place play-off – as Germany beat Portugal.

In October this year, Qatar centre-back Tarek Salman was sent off in the second leg of his country’s final qualifier against the United Arab Emirates and given the statutory two-match suspension for serious foul play.

Ecuador’s Moises Caicedo and Argentina’s Nicolas Otamendi will have to sit out the first game of next year’s finals after being sent off for two bookable offences in their final qualifying matches.

The same fate was suffered by Colombia’s Fredy Guarin in 2014 and Serbia and Montenegro’s Nemanja Vidic in 2006.

Sale director of rugby Alex Sanderson calls England flanker Tom Curry a “bully,” and Sale head coach Felipe Contepomi claims that this is “laughable.”

Contepomi also accused the forward of swearing and pushing him in the tunnel following England’s 27-23 victory over the Pumas on Sunday.

Sanderson claims he was unaware of any disciplinary action that would have forced the back rower to miss the game and that Curry, 27, will play for Sale in Friday’s game against Exeter in the Prem.

When Sanderson was asked about the incident involving Curry and Contepomi, Sanderson responded, “I’m not giving it any air time, whatsoever.”

Later, Sanderson was asked if he had a “bully” response and responded, “only a laughable one,” before adding that “it is ridiculous in the context of the man that he is.”

Curry was named to the 2025 World Rugby XV Dream Team, and Sanderson confirmed that the squad applauded the forward’s performance.

To reach those heights, you know that’s no mean feat, said Sanderson, “on the back of a career-threatening injury and a broken wrist.”

After winning victories against Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, and Argentina, Sanderson claimed that the players who had returned to the club after England duty were “in good fettle” and “motivated.

Tom Roebuck, the wing for England and the Sharks, will be out for seven to eight weeks after breaking his toe in the 33-19 win over the All Blacks, he also confirmed.

Roebuck, 24, will need to wear a protective boot in addition to having surgery.

After his side lost 2-0 to Motherwell, Hibernian head coach David Gray made reference to the Ibrox incident and lamented the officials’ lack of consistency.

What does the handball law actually say in terms of Scottish football, despite the two incidents? And how well is it being put into practice?

Tete Yengi, the home team’s goalkeeper, scored the only goal of the game against Rangers on Saturday when they had just given it a level goal.

The close-range shot, which was a tame effort, hit Emmanuel Fernandez’s hand, which was in the direction of the goal.

At the time, video assistant referee (VAR) John Beaton did not advise an on-field review, and match official Ross Hardie did not intervene.

The Scottish Football Association (SFA) advised the BBC on Saturday that the Rangers centre-back was in close proximity to the goal and that his movement was natural as he moved across the face of goal.

Does the SFA’s statement that the incident has “officially been recognized as a mistake” become outdated given Livingston’s claim?

When Motherwell’s forward Elijah Just fired a shot from a tight angle at Fir Park on Tuesday, it was Hibs defender Grant Hanley’s outstretched hand that struck the ball.

With Scotland’s centre-back Hanley only a yard away from the strike’s striking position, it is difficult to tell whether the effort was on target. Hanley was sent off for denying a goal-scoring opportunity 15 minutes later.

Referee Duncan Nicolson didn’t take any action at all at the beginning, like in the Ibrox incident. However, Nicolson then directed the ball to the spot after suggesting an on-field review.

The rules from the Board of the International Football Association (Ifab) – football’s lawmakers – state that a ball striking a player’s arm or hand does not automatically result in penalisation.

What else must the ball hit below the armpit before it can be deemed an offense?

Okay, but when does a handball cease to be a handball?

There are numerous factors to consider, and managers are clamoring for consistency as a result of these decisions’ subjective nature.

But how do these things relate to the recent Ibrox and Fir Park incidents?

What should happen if a player avoids a ball from hitting their own goal with their hand or arm intentionally, doesn’t intentionally handle it, and doesn’t grow their body in an unnatural way bigger? This is a convenient FAQ on the Ifab website.

The solution Not a jerk. As they watched the incident from Ibrox, perhaps that was what the VAR room was thinking.

Gray, the head coach of the Hibs, disagreed with the player’s punishment.

He told BBC Scotland, “I’m not sure what he’s meant to do with that.” “The shot is clearly going a long way.” Grant [Hanley] hasn’t even attempted to block the shot, making himself any bigger.

Inconsistency is what I find to be the biggest issue. What I just watched on Saturday at Ibrox… Is there a problem with consistency? The rule is unknown to me.

The penalty decision is so severe, said BBC Scotland’s Lee Miller on Sportsound. Is the position unnatural? It also has a “miles”-wide range.

Martindale, the Livingston boss, was perplexed on Saturday as well. I can’t understand how it wasn’t given in our favor, he said.

It’s going on target, which is a possibility. If that occurs in Livingston, I am aware that it offends us. I am completely aware that we are facing repercussions.

It’s disappointing when we spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on technology to get important decisions right in games.

Michael Stewart, a former Premiership player, responded to the incident at Ibrox by calling it “outrageous” for the VAR to refrain from participating.

Neil McCann, a former Rangers winger and coach, claimed that Martindale was “right to be fuming.”