The Wimbledon singles main draw, which will feature the most visiting players in 41 years, has been announced by Britain’s world number 719 Oliver Tarvet.
In the final round of qualifying on Thursday, Tarvet defeated Belgian world number 144 Alexander Blockx 6-3,3-6,6-2,6-3.
The 21-year-old was playing a best-of-five match for the first time.
When Wimbledon begins on June 30th, there will be 11 men and 12 women players in the singles draw following Tarvet’s victory.
The Englishman, who hails from St. Albans, has one year to finish his University of San Diego studies.
Tarvet won’t be able to claim the majority of his £66, 000 prize money for reaching the Wimbledon first round because the majority of college sports are solely amateurs.
There are many emotions, according to Tarvet, but the main one is simply joy.
It’s been my dream since I was a young child.
In the opening two rounds of qualifying, Tavert defeated Frenchman Alexis Galarneau and Frenchman Terence Atmane.
Swiss Leandro Riedi defeated British world number 550 Hamish Stewart 6-3,4-6,6-3,6-4 earlier on Thursday.
I might be using a private jet to take my coach home.
Tarvet’s prize money situation is not unusual.
After reaching the second round of the US Open while still an amateur at the University of Texas, Australian Maya Joint forfeited more than $200, 000 in prize money last year.
Student-athletes may make up to $10,000 from any prize money, which will be used for travel costs and entrance fees.
I’m very interested in returning to University of San Diego for my fourth year because I’ve got to find a lot of expenses,” Tarvet said.
“I’m so appreciative of what they have done for me,” I said. I want to make a significant impact on US history with my fourth year there.
Tarvet’s plans are “improbably unlikely to change.”
It’s unlikely that Tarvet’s plans for the year ahead will change after qualifying for the Wimbledon main draw.
He is said to be eager to earn his degree and participate in his final year of college in the country’s notoriously competitive US program.
In this year’s NCAA Championships, he won 23 of his 25 matches and placed among the top 5 singles players in the division one.
Although Tarvet has only won two professional tournaments this year, the San Diego-based ITF World Tour event, which cost $ 15, 000.
In his brief career, the world number 719 has already won five titles, all of which were held at the lowest level of the professional ladder.
A fast-moving wildfire has engulfed holiday homes and forest land on a section of the Greek coastline just 40km (25 miles) south of the capital, Athens.
More than 100 firefighters, supported by two dozen firefighting aircraft, battled the wildfire that tore across the coastal area of Palaia Fokaia on Thursday, officials said. The flames were whipped up by high winds as temperatures approached 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in the country’s first heatwave of the summer.
Fire department spokesman Vassilis Vathrakogiannis told reporters that 40 people had been evacuated by police, with evacuation orders issued for a total of five areas. A seaside roadway running across the affected areas was protectively cordoned off, he added.
The coastguard said two patrol boats and nine private vessels were on standby in the Palaia Fokaia area in case an evacuation by sea became necessary.
“We’re telling people to leave their homes”, local town councillor Apostolos Papadakis said on Greece’s state-run ERT television.
The cause of the fire was not immediately known, but the fire department spokesman said that an arson investigation unit had been sent to the area.
Local mayor Dimitris Loukas said on ERT television that several houses were believed to have been damaged by the blaze.
The wider Athens area, as well as several Aegean islands, were on Level 4 of a 5-level scale measuring the risk of wildfires owing to the weather conditions, with the heatwave expected to last until the weekend.
Early in the week, hundreds of firefighters took four days to bring a major wildfire under control on the eastern Aegean island of Chios, where a state of emergency was declared and more than a dozen evacuation orders issued.
The fire department said one woman had been arrested on suspicion of having contributed to the sparking of that fire.
Greece has spent hundreds of millions of euros to compensate households and farmers for damage related to extreme weather and to acquire new equipment to deal with wildfires.
It has increased its number of firefighters to a record 18, 000 this year.
Iran’s Guardian Council has ratified a parliament-approved legislation to suspend Tehran’s cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, after the war with Israel and the United States.
Iranian news outlets reported on Thursday that the appointed council, which has veto power over bills approved by lawmakers, found the parliament’s measure to “not to be in contradiction to the Islamic principles and the Constitution”.
Guardian Council spokesperson Hadi Tahan Nazif told the official state news agency, IRNA, that the government is now required to suspend cooperation with the IAEA for the “full respect for the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran”.
Nazif added that the decision was prompted by the “attacks … by the Zionist regime and the United States against peaceful nuclear facilities”.
The bill will be submitted to President Masoud Pezeshkian for final approval and would allow Iran “to benefit from all the entitlements specified under … the Non-Proliferation Treaty, especially with regard to uranium enrichment”, Nazif said.
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf suggested that the legislation is now binding after the Guardian Council’s approval.
“Continued cooperation with the agency, which plays a role as a protector of anti-human interests and an agent of the illegitimate Zionist regime through the pretext of war and aggression, is not possible until the security of our nuclear facilities is ensured,” Ghalibaf said in a social media post.
However, the IAEA said on Thursday that it had not received an official communication from Iran regarding the suspension.
Iranian officials have been decrying the IAEA’s failure to condemn Israeli attacks on the country’s nuclear facilities.
Before the war started, Tehran claimed to have obtained Israeli documents that show that the IAEA was passing off information to Israel about Iran’s nuclear programme – allegations that were denied by the agency.
Israel is widely believed to have its own nuclear arsenal, but its nuclear programme has not been monitored by the UN watchdog.
For years, Iranian nuclear sites have been under strict IAEA inspection, including by constant video feed. But it appears that Iran moved its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium from the facilities before they were bombed by Israel and the US during the recent war, putting them out of the view of UN observers for the first time.
US and Israeli officials have argued that the military strikes have set back Iran’s nuclear programme for years. But suspending cooperation with the IAEA could escalate the programme, although Tehran insists that it is not seeking a nuclear weapon.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Thursday that Moscow was “interested in Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA continuing”.
“We are interested in everyone respecting the supreme leader of Iran, who has repeatedly stated that Iran does not and will not have plans to create nuclear weapons,” Lavrov said.
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul also told journalists that Berlin “urges the Iranian government not to go down this path” and cease cooperation with the board.
On June 13, Israel launched a surprise bombing campaign against Iran, striking residential buildings and nuclear sites and military facilities, killing top commanders and scientists as well as hundreds of civilians.
Iran responded with barrages of missiles that left widespread destruction in Israel and killed at least 29 people.
On Sunday, the US joined Israel and launched unprecedented strikes on Iran’s Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites.
Following Iran’s retaliatory attack on a US military base in Qatar, a ceasefire was reached between the countries.
Barely 72 hours after United States President Donald Trump’s air strikes against Iran, a controversy erupted over the extent of the damage they had done to the country’s uranium enrichment facilities in Fordow and Natanz.
The New York Times and CNN leaked a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment that the damage may have been “from moderate to severe”, noting it had “low confidence” in the findings because they were an early assessment.
Trump had claimed the sites were “obliterated”.
The difference in opinion mattered because it goes to the heart of whether the US and Israel had eliminated Iran’s ability to enrich uranium to levels that would allow it to make nuclear weapons, at least for years.
Israel has long claimed – without evidence – that Iran plans to build nuclear bombs. Iran has consistently insisted that its nuclear programme is purely of a civilian nature. And the US has been divided on the question – its intelligence community concluding as recently as March that Tehran was not building a nuclear bomb, but Trump claiming earlier in June that Iran was close to building such a weapon.
Yet amid the conflicting claims and assessments on the damage from the US strikes to Iranian nuclear facilities and whether the country wants atomic weapons, one thing is clear: Tehran says it has no intentions of giving up on its nuclear programme.
So what is the future of that programme? How much damage has it suffered? Will the US and Israel allow Iran to revive its nuclear programme? And can a 2015 diplomatic deal with Iran – that was working well until Trump walked out of it – be brought back to life?
What Iran wants
In his first public comments since the US bombing, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that the attack “did nothing significant” to Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar said Khamenei spoke of how “most of the [nuclear] sites are still in place and that Iran is going to continue its nuclear programme”.
Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, on Tuesday said that “preparations for recovery had already been anticipated, and our plan is to prevent any interruption in production or services”.
To be sure, even if they haven’t been destroyed, Natanz and Fordow – Iran’s only known enrichment sites – have suffered significant damage, according to satellite images. Israel has also assassinated several of Iran’s top nuclear scientists in its wave of strikes that began on June 13.
However, the DIA said in the initial assessment that the Trump administration has tried to dismiss, that the attacks had only set Iran’s nuclear programme back by months. It also said that Iran had moved uranium enriched at these facilities away from these sites prior to the strikes. Iranian officials have also made the same claim.
The UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), had accused Iran of enriching up to 400kg of uranium to 60 percent – not far below the 90 percent enrichment that is needed to make weapons.
Asked on Wednesday whether he thought the enriched uranium had been smuggled out from the nuclear facilities before the strikes, Trump said, “We think everything nuclear is down there, they didn’t take it out.” Asked again later, he said, “We think we hit them so hard and so fast they didn’t get to move.”
(Al Jazeera)
What was the extent of damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities?
Without on-site inspections, nobody can be sure.
Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe on Wednesday posted a statement saying, “several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years”. That’s a very different timeline from what the DIA suggested in its early assessment.
But it’s important to remember that the DIA and CIA also disagreed on whether Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in 2003.
The DIA sided with the UN’s view that inspections had proven Hussein didn’t have such weapons. The CIA, on the other hand, provided intelligence that backed the position of then-president George W Bush in favour of an invasion – intelligence that was later debunked. In that instance, the CIA proved politically more malleable than the DIA.
Amid the current debate over whether Iranian nuclear sites were destroyed, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has also weighed in favour of the president’s view.
“Iran’s nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do,” she posted on Twitter/X.
But Gabbard has already demonstrably changed her public statements to suit Trump.
In March, she testified before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003”.
On June 20, Trump was asked for his reaction to that assessment. “She’s wrong,” he said.
Gabbard later that day posted that her testimony had been misquoted by “the dishonest media” and that “America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly”.
Gabbard’s clarification did not contradict her earlier view, that Iran was not actively trying to build a weapon.
Asked in an interview with a French radio network whether Iran’s nuclear programme had been destroyed, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi replied, “I think ‘destroyed’ is too much. But it suffered enormous damage.”
On Wednesday, Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission concurred with the CIA, saying Iran’s nuclear facilities had been rendered “totally inoperable” and had “set back Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons for many years to come”.
Also on Wednesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the destruction of Iran’s surface facilities at Isfahan was proof enough of Iran’s inability to make a bomb.
“The conversion facility, which you can’t do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility, we can’t even find where it is, where it used to be on the map,” he told reporters.
(Al Jazeera)
Can a 2015 diplomatic deal be resuscitated?
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), negotiated with Iran by France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the US, China, Russia and the European Union in 2015, was the only agreement ever reached governing Iran’s nuclear programme.
The JCPOA allowed Iran to enrich its own uranium, but limited it to the 3.7 percent enrichment levels required for a nuclear reactor to generate electricity. At Israel’s behest, Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran walked away from it a year later – but before that, it was working.
Even though Trump has said he will never return to the JCPOA, which was negotiated by his predecessor, Barack Obama, he could return to an agreement of his own making that strongly resembles it. The crucial question is, whether Israel will this time back it, and whether Iran will be allowed to have even a peaceful nuclear programme, which it is legally entitled to.
On Wednesday, Trump didn’t sound as though he was moving in this direction. “We may sign an agreement. I don’t know. I don’t think it’s that necessary,” he told reporters at The Hague.
Any JCPOA-like agreement would also require Iran to allow IAEA inspectors to get back to ensuring that Tehran meets its nuclear safeguard commitments.
“IAEA inspectors have remained in Iran throughout the conflict and are ready to start working as soon as possible, going back to the country’s nuclear sites and verifying the inventories of nuclear material,” the IAEA said on Tuesday.
But Iran’s powerful Guardian Council on Thursday approved a parliamentary bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, suggesting that Tehran is at the moment not in the mood to entertain any UN oversight of its nuclear facilities.
What happens if Iran returns to enriching uranium?
“If Iran wants a civil nuclear programme, they can have one, just like many other countries in the world have one, and [the way for] that is, they import enriched material,” Rubio told journalist Bari Weiss on the Podcast, Honestly, in April.
“But if they insist on enriching [themselves], then they will be the only country in the world that doesn’t have a weapons programme, quote unquote, but is enriching. And so I think that’s problematic,” he said.
Ali Ansari, an Iran historian at St. Andrews University in the UK, told Al Jazeera that “there have already been calls to cease uranium enrichment from activists within the country”.
But the defiant statements from Iranian officials since the US strikes – including from Khamenei on Thursday – suggest that Tehran is not ready to give up on enrichment.
Trump has, in recent days, suggested that he wants Iran to give up its nuclear programme altogether.
On Tuesday, Trump posted on TruthSocial, “IRAN WILL NEVER REBUILD THEIR NUCLEAR FACILITIES!”
He doubled down on that view on Wednesday.
“Iran has a huge advantage. They have great oil, and they can do things. I don’t see them getting back involved in the nuclear business any more, I think they’ve had it,” he told reporters at the end of the NATO summit in The Hague.
And then he suggested the US would again strike Iran’s facilities, even if it weren’t building a bomb. “If [Iran] does [get involved], we’re always there, we’ll have to do something about it.” If he didn’t, “someone else” would hit Iran’s nuclear facilities, he suggested.
That “someone” would be Israel – which has long tried to kill any diplomatic effort over Iran’s nuclear programme.
At the NATO summit, Trump was asked whether Israel and Iran might start a war again soon.
The Ondo State Government has stated that it was necessary to restore the dignity of Owo’s culture by destroying the memorial park constructed in Owo in honor of the victims of the massacre at Saint Francis Xavier Catholic Church on June 5, 2022.
In response to the Catholic Church’s position on the matter, it made this known in a statement signed by Prince Ebenezer Adeniyan, the governor’s chief press secretary.
According to the state government, the key to the response was to correct the church’s statements.
INCLUDE Ondo government demolishes victims’ memorial park in an owo church attack
The Catholic Diocese of Ondo has condemned the demolition of the Memorial Park in Owo in memory of the victims of the massacre at the Saint Francis Xavier Catholic Church on June 5, 2022.
The statement said in part that it was necessary to restore Owo’s cultural dignity and the site’s original purpose. Following thorough consultation with the Olowo-in-Council’s Owo-in-Council representatives, this was done.
AgroMore Limited (of No. 10) was the first to control the land for the Memorial Park. Before he became the Olowo of Owo, Oba Ajibade Gbadegesin Ogunoye owned the business 1, Oke Ogun Street, Owo. The Olusegun Mimiko administration deposed the land in 2010 to make way for road dualization. The land was re-allocated to AgroMore Limited, the land’s previous owner, in January 2021 by the (Oluwarotimi) Akeredolu administration. ”
There was no record of an official revocation of the land from AgroMore at the time of the cenotaph, according to the statement, adding that the state government later realized the errors made when the land was taken over for the construction of the cenotaph.
There have also been protests by various Owo residents against the location of the memorial park, which is said to be against the culture of the land, which is located in the town and in front of the palace. ”
It was built in the style of a cemetery, complete with insignia of the dead and inscriptions of the names of all the victims, even though there were no bodies buried there. It stated that Olowo-in-Council and Owo people were against and detested as taboo.
Further, it added that Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, the former governor’s tragic death, had been the subject of ongoing discussions between the palace and the state government regarding the possibility of moving the park.
Bishop Arogundade’s statement, however, did not mention that the Catholic Diocese had never sought engagement with the state government in an effort to slam the protests against them. ”
Prior to the tragic passing of the former governor, Arakunrin Oluwarotimi Odunayo Akeredolu, there had been ongoing discussions between the Palace of the Olowo and the state government regarding the possibility of moving the Memorial Park.
INCLUDE Owo Memorial Park Demolition Is Condemned By Catholic Church, Akeredolu’s Widow
Some former government officials jumped to the finish line of the cenotaph, which was never completed, claiming that some of the former’s leaders had benefited from Akeredolu’s (due to ill health) delaying those discussions.
The Olowo-in-Council and the government engaged in a conversation after Governor Aiyedatiwa took office, according to the statement.
The state government made the decision to reverse the incorrect revocation of the land and give it back to its original owner, the Olowo of Owo, after an agreement was reached with the Palace of the Olowo regarding the cenotaph’s relocation. Therefore, the state government authorised the demolition of the cenotaph, and it was Olowo of Owo and AgroMore Limited, the land’s owners who were the ones who were the ones who were the rightful owners. ”
A team of government officials has been assigned to coordinate with relevant stakeholders to arrange the construction of a new cenotaph in an area that is respectful to the Owo people, according to Governor Aiyedatiwa.
In a statement, the Catholic diocese, Most Rev. Most Rev., the Catholic Bishop of Ondo Diocese, signed. Arogundade’s daughter, Jude, was upset about what had happened.
The demolition was deemed a “violation of our shared respect for the dignity of life and the memory of the “41 brothers and sisters who were unjustly murdered” on June 2, 2022, according to the statement.
Lorraine Stanley, known for playing Karen Taylor on EastEnders, was met with reaction after sharing a video of the BBC soap star dancing with her daughter Nancy
EastEnders star Lorraine Stanley dances in new video
Former EastEnders cast member Lorraine Stanley has addressed the suggestion that she’s a grandparent. It comes after she was met with reaction from fans on TikTok after posting a video of herself dancing alongside her daughter.
Lorraine, 48, who played Karen Taylor on the BBC soap, and her fiancé Mark Perez are parents to Nancy, nine, together. She occassionally features in videos shared by the actor on the platform, with the mother and daughter often taking on dance trends at home together.
The latest, uploaded last week, saw Lorraine and Nancy perform a choreographed routine to Maroon 5 and SZA’s song What Lovers Do. Lorraine wrote in the caption: “It’s been a while!” She included hashtags like #motherdaughter.
It’s attracted more than 40,000 likes and fans reacted to the video in the comments section. The reaction included the suggestion that Nancy was Lorraine’s granddaughter, which led the former soap star to assert that wasn’t the case.
Lorraine Stanley (left) was met with reaction over a video of her dancing with her daughter Nancy in a video on TikTok recently(Image: Tiktok/Lorraine Stanley)
One asked: “Is that your granddaughter?” Alongside an emoji depicting a face with rolling eyes, Lorraine replied to them: “Daughter.” In another reply, beside a laughing emoj, she wrote: “Daughter #motherdaughter is a bit of a clue.”
Article continues below
Someone else wrote in the comments section just days ago: “Nothing better than seeing a grandparent have that kind of fun with their grandchild.” Seemingly amused by it, Lorraine replied by sharing a trio of laughing emojis.
Lorraine – whose five stone weight loss in recent years has continued to attract attention – was also met with praise over her apppearance. It included her receiving compliments from a former colleague from EastEnders.
The actor, pictured in 2017, is best known for her role as Karen Taylor on EastEnders(Image: BBC/Jack Barnes)
Shona McGarty, 33, who played Whitney Dean on the soap opera, wrote in the comments section: “Lou! Love this.” She added: “You look great!” Lorraine shared her appreciation by replying to Shona: “Thank you mate!!!! Lots of love.”
One fan wrote: “You look incredible!! Look how happy your daughter is to be doing the dances with you too. So lovely.” Another said: “You look fantastic you were always my favourite on eastenders you were so funny.”
Another said: “Oh how cute is this! & the smiles from both of you say it all. looking wonderful lady…hope you have an amazing summer.” Someone wrote: “You look great! Glad you’re happy and enjoying dancing with your family.”
The video is the latest update from Lorraine, who has previously posted about her weight loss journey on the platform(Image: Instagram/Lorraine Stanley)
Several fans asked Lorraine about her weight loss. It comes after she revealed in a post on TikTok back in April that she had gastric sleeve surgery. Lorraine suggested at the time that it took place towards the start of 2023.
Alongside photos of her from different stages of the experience, she told her followers: “It’s been over two years since I started my journey. Lots of you are asking how I did it.I hope you enjoy my little weight loss journey video.”
Article continues below
Lorraine gave further details in the comments section at the time. She told one fan: “I was slightly embarrassed to tell the world I’d had surgery.” She also said: “I wish I could say it was [through diet], but I did have to change my diet & still have to work hard to eat the right stuff to maintain it.”
Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs onTikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTubeandThreads.
READ MORE: Maura Higgins swears by this Sol de Janeiro body oil for her glowy holiday skin
