Archive November 13, 2025

Sinner defeats Zverev, reaches ATP Finals semifinals in Turin

Defending champion Jannik Sinner reached the semifinals of the ATP Finals with a 6-4 6-3 win over two-time winner Alexander Zverev on Wednesday, with Ben Shelton eliminated after losing earlier to Felix Auger-Aliassime in the same group.

Italy’s Sinner extended his indoor hardcourt winning streak to 28 matches, but victory over his German rival was not as comfortable as the scoreline suggests, with the world No 2 under pressure early in both sets.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“A very, very competitive match, a very close match,” Sinner said. “I felt like I was serving very well in important moments. I tried to play the best tennis possible when it mattered, which fortunately went my way.”

The pair, the only two previous ATP Finals champions in this year’s competition in Italy, had both won their opening Bjorn Borg Group matches.

Sinner returns the ball to Germany’s Alexander Zverev during their match in Turin [Antonio Calanni/AP]

Zverev fails to capitalise on break opportunities

On Wednesday, Sinner faced seven break points compared with Zverev’s four but pulled out aces and delightful drop shots when it counted.

Sinner made a slow start, facing two break points in the opening game, but found four aces at vital points to hold after nine minutes. He let slip two break points at 5-4 up before racing to the net to outwit Zverev and take the first set.

Sinner came back from 0-40 to hold his first service game of the second set, and Zverev forced another break point when the Italian next served, but the champion’s composure never wavered and he broke to lead 4-2, a sliced drop shot the winning point.

Zverev responded by taking a 30-40 lead in the following game, but Sinner held firm. At one stage, a whipped backhand down the line had the German shaking his head in disbelief, and he fell to his third loss to Sinner in 17 days, while the Turin crowd rose to acclaim the Italian.

Sinner must retain his title undefeated to have any chance of ending the year as world number one, while Carlos Alcaraz needs one more match win to stay top of the rankings.

Alcaraz, with two wins from two, faces Lorenzo Musetti on Thursday, with Taylor Fritz meeting Alex de Minaur in the other match of the tournament’s second Jimmy Connors Group.

Jannik Sinner and Alexander Zverev react.
Sinner, left, with Zverev after winning his group stage match [Guglielmo Mangiapane/Reuters]

Auger-Aliassime earns first win

Canada’s Auger-Aliassime, who lost his opener against Sinner, came from a set down to beat Shelton 4-6 7-6(7) 7-5, to leave the American without a win after his defeat against Zverev.

Shelton powered through the opening set, but Auger-Aliassime forced a decider with a tiebreak victory in the second and broke serve to convert a third match point in the final set.

The American lost his cool when failing to serve out for the first set, launching his racket in frustration when Auger-Aliassime made it 5-4, but Shelton broke again.

In the second set tiebreak, where Shelton fell and hurt his knee, Auger-Aliassime took a 3-0 lead. Shelton managed to save three set points before a double fault ended his valiant effort.

The Canadian held break points at 2-1 up in the final set but had to wait until the final game, where Shelton was guilty of gifting match points, and Auger-Aliassime did not refuse.

Auger-Aliassime will face Zverev on Friday, with a semifinal place on the line.

Felix Auger-Aliassime in action.
Canada’s Felix Auger-Aliassime returns the ball to United States’ Ben Shelton during their ATP World Tour Finals match [Antonio Calanni/AP]

New rulers, old killers: Bangladesh extrajudicial deaths mount under Yunus

Dhaka, Bangladesh — When Sheikh Hasina was ousted as Bangladesh’s prime minister in August 2024 after a student-led uprising, many in the country believed the darkest days of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings were finally over.

The interim administration, led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, sworn in on August 8 last year, arrived on promises of justice, reform and an end to state violence. But more than a year on, those promises are under question.

A new report by the Bangladeshi rights group Odhikar shows that while the number of killings has fallen sharply, the system of impunity that allowed such abuses to flourish remains largely intact.

Here’s what the findings show and why they matter as Bangladesh prepares for parliamentary elections in February to choose its next government.

The killings continue

From 2009 – when Hasina came back to power after six years spent out of office – to 2022, Bangladesh’s security forces are accused of having killed at least 2,597 people through extrajudicial executions, custodial torture or by opening fire on protesters, an analysis of human rights data suggests.

Human rights excesses under Hasina were a major trigger for the mass protests that culminated in her ouster.

But according to Odhikar’s latest report, extrajudicial killings have claimed at least 40 lives from August 2024 to September 2025 under the Yunus-led interim government.

The victims were shot, tortured in custody or beaten to death – methods chillingly reminiscent of the previous government. The victims included political activists, detainees held without warrants, alleged criminals and citizens caught in security operations, according to the report, based on information from human rights defenders affiliated with Odhikar as well as information and data published across various media outlets.

While the scale of these incidents is smaller than during Hasina’s rule, the continuation of such practices has alarmed human rights defenders.

“We are seeing a gradual increase in the number of extrajudicial killings, which is not what we expected,” Nur Khan Liton, rights activist and member of the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances, told Al Jazeera. The commission is a government-appointed investigative body formed on August 27, 2024, by the Yunus administration. It is tasked with investigating widespread disappearances under the previous government, identifying those responsible, and ensuring justice and reparations for victims and their families.

The interim government, made up of academics and former civil servants, had been among the loudest critics of Hasina’s rule. Yunus himself spoke of building a “Bangladesh free from fear”.

Yet the same security agencies – police; the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), a paramilitary force; and intelligence units – continue to operate without meaningful reform or external oversight, rights groups said.

In several cases, detainees were picked up by security forces; taken to army camps, RAB camps or police stations; and later declared dead in the hospital.

Asif Shikdar, a youth leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party’s (BNP’s) youth wing, was detained by joint security forces in Mirpur, Dhaka, in July, reportedly on allegations of illegal arms possession, which his family and party said were fabricated.

Hours after his arrest, he was taken to Shaheed Suhrawardy Hospital and declared dead with the death certificate stating only “unconscious on arrival”.

In Italla village near Cumilla city in the country’s south, 40-year-old Towhidul Islam, also a BNP youth wing leader, was detained by “plainclothes members of a joint force” early on January 31, according to The Daily Star newspaper. Hours later, he was declared dead at a local hospital, and doctors and family members reported visible marks of torture on his body.

Towhidul, who worked at a shipping company in Chattogram port, had returned to his village to attend his father’s funeral. He left behind a wife and four daughters.

After public outrage, the army camp commander was withdrawn, and the army pledged justice while the Yunus administration announced the formation of an investigation committee.

In response to queries from Al Jazeera about Towhidul’s death, Lieutenant Colonel Sami Ud Dowla Chowdhury, director of Inter Services Public Relations, the military’s communications arm, said: “In response to the incident, an inquiry board was convened by Bangladesh Army. Upon completion of the investigation, a total of seven individuals were recommended for appropriate administrative actions.”

“Disciplinary actions were taken against all individuals, ranging from dismissal from service to other appropriate actions as advised by the inquiry,” Chowdhury added.

What the data show

Odhikar’s report, which covers the first 14 months of the interim government, documents an average of three extrajudicial killings per month. The trend appears to be worsening with 11 people killed in the latest quarter alone, from July to September.

The report categorises 19 victims as shot dead in “crossfire” or “encounters”, 14 as killed under torture and seven as beaten to death in custody.

These deaths bear what human rights activists said are hallmarks of impunity: arrests without warrants, denial of due process and an absence of credible investigation.

In Bhola, an island district in southern Bangladesh, Nazrul Islam died in August 2024 after he was detained on theft allegations and allegedly tortured in police custody. No officer has been charged in connection with his death.

In Gazipur on the outskirts of Dhaka, garment worker Habibur Rahman was reportedly shot dead when police opened fire to disperse a labour protest this year. His death has not led to any judicial inquiry or accountability.

Odhikar noted that despite Bangladesh ratifying the United Nations Convention Against Torture and its Optional Protocol, it still lacks an effective mechanism to hold law enforcement accountable for excesses.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Odhikar’s director of advocacy and campaigns, Taskin Fahmina, described the continuation of killings as “worrying but not entirely surprising, considering the institutional legacy”.

“Significantly, the number has come down compared to the previous regime,” she said. “But we must remember that those now serving in the security forces carry the legacy of the old system.”

Fahmina noted that unlike under Hasina, these incidents no longer appear to be centrally ordered. “During the previous government, killings and enforced disappearances were systematic, directed from high levels of power. Under this government, we haven’t documented enforced disappearances. That’s a positive shift,” she said.

But she also cited an incident from July when security forces clashed with supporters of Hasina’s Awami League in Gopalganj, her home district. Five people died of gunshot wounds. Such incidents, she said, “suggest that the use of lethal force [by security forces] still persists”.

Fahmina said the military’s prolonged involvement in law enforcement has eroded professionalism. The army has remained deployed on Bangladesh’s streets since July 2024 after the mass protests that led to Hasina’s ouster. Its continued presence was necessitated by the collapse of civilian law enforcement during the upheaval, including a nationwide police strike that left many stations abandoned and caused disorder.

“The army is not trained for civilian law enforcement. Long deployment in the streets has affected their discipline,” Fahmina said.

On November 5, the director of the Military Operations Directorate, Brigadier General Dewan Mohammad Monzur Hossain, said the army had received a government directive to withdraw 50 percent of its members from field duty.

From hope to hesitation and fear

During Hasina’s 15-year rule, Bangladesh witnessed an entrenched culture of impunity among security forces that, critics said, corroded democratic institutions and normalised state violence. Thousands of people were allegedly abducted or killed by security forces.

The fall of her government was seen as a symbolic end to that era. When Yunus assumed office, both Bangladeshis and the international community saw his leadership as a moral departure from the practices of the past. His advisers pledged security-sector reforms, transparency and justice for past abuses.

But analysts said his moral authority has not translated into control.

The Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances has so far recorded a total of 1,752 cases of enforced disappearances during Hasina’s administration. According to the commission, many of the victims were kept in secret detention facilities, and several were killed while 330 people remain missing to this day. The RAB, police and Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) – the country’s military intelligence agency, which has traditionally reported directly to the Prime Minister’s Office – have been accused of carrying out many of these killings and disappearances.

But the RAB, on which the United States placed sanctions in 2021 for extrajudicial killings, continues to operate.

In February, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights released a report on the killings during the July 2024 uprising and recommended to the Yunus government that the RAB and the National Telecommunication Monitoring Centre (NTMC), the telecom surveillance agency long criticised for unlawful surveillance of Hasina’s opponents, be dissolved. It also suggested that the powers of other paramilitary agencies, including the DGFI, be strictly limited to military intelligence activities.

However, those recommendations have not been implemented and uncertainty continues to surround the prosecution of officials accused of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings under the previous government.

In October, Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal issued arrest warrants for 30 people, including Hasina and 25 serving or retired army officers, accused of enforced disappearances and other crimes under the previous government.

On October 22, the tribunal rejected the bail applications of 15 officers who had already been taken into custody and ordered they be held in jail. The whereabouts of the remaining accused, including top figures associated with the DGFI and Hasina’s defence adviser Tarique Ahmed Siddique, remain unclear. A trial is ongoing.

Families of victims described the move as a long-overdue step towards justice. But rights activists said there is still uncertainty over the future of the trial. “Since the 2024 uprising, neither the law enforcement agencies nor the public have been able to place trust in one another.

Given the political and social instability, no one is certain about which direction the country is heading, Liton told Al Jazeera.

Police headquarters, responding to media queries, denied systematic abuse.

It said deaths in custody or during operations are “subject to internal review and legal action if necessary”.

Al Jazeera sought a response from Yunus’s media office but has received no reply.

Senior BNP leader Amir Khasru Mahmud Chowdhury said he believes only a government elected in the national vote in February may address abuses by security forces. In the absence of an elected authority, state institutions were operating without accountability, he told Al Jazeera.

“There is no elected watchdog or people’s representative in place. Without political authority and legitimacy, the administration, including the law enforcement agencies, often does not take directives seriously. They act on their own,” he said. “Once an elected government, parliament and public representatives take office, accountability will return. By default, an elected system creates checks and balances.”

But history suggests that the reality is more complex.

“We have observed such extrajudicial killings in the name of crossfire by the RAB back in 2004,” Liton said. In that year, the RAB was formed by a BNP-led coalition government that was then in power.

What’s up with Wales and Spurs ‘mystery’ Johnson?

Getty Images
  • 23 Comments

World Cup qualifier: Liechtenstein v Wales

Venue: Rheinpark Stadion, Vaduz Date: Saturday, 15 November Kick-off: 17:00 GMT

He scored the winning goal in last season’s Europa League final and cost Tottenham Hotspur £50m, making him the second most expensive Welshman in history – second only to the great Gareth Bale.

So why, when Wales faced Belgium in a vital World Cup qualifier last month, was Brennan Johnson dropped?

On the face of it, the 24-year-old should be a figurehead for his country, a proven Premier League goalscorer in a squad where most players represent clubs in the second or third tiers. Yet Johnson finds himself out of favour.

With the likes of Mohammed Kudus, Xavi Simons and Mathys Tel competing with him for a starting spot at Spurs, rotation is hardly a surprise.

But for Wales, Johnson would expect to be one of the first names on the team sheet – even if his performances have underwhelmed for some time.

It was still significant, then, when head coach Craig Bellamy relegated the former Nottingham Forest forward to the bench against Belgium.

Wales conclude their World Cup qualifying group with matches against Liechtenstein on Saturday and North Macedonia three days later, all but certain to be in the play-offs next March.

    • 1 day ago
    • 2 days ago
    • 2 days ago

‘We need to temper our expectations’

To assess Johnson’s career with Wales, it is instructive to start from the beginning.

He made his debut aged 19 in November 2020. Then, after missing out on the squad for the Covid-delayed Euro 2020 the following summer, it was not until the 2022 World Cup campaign that he really established himself in the senior set-up.

Just as Johnson’s international career was taking off, the end was fast approaching for Bale, Wales’ greatest player of all time.

“Brennan’s had a lot of pressure and expectation,” says former Wales striker Nathan Blake.

“I’ve been around people who were already labelling him the next messiah and I was like ‘Stop putting that sort of pressure on the boy’. You have to let him develop into whatever he becomes.

“If he becomes the next Gareth Bale, great. But I always say, I don’t want to see the next Gareth Bale, I want to see the first Brennan Johnson. Right? Because he’s different to Gareth Bale. They’re not the same person.”

Bale was irreplaceable. As well as being Wales’ record goalscorer and cap holder, Bale was a generational talent, a freak of nature, a magician who could change the course of a match all on his own. He was a one-off. As Bellamy says: “There’s no next Gareth Bale.”

Brennan Johnson puts his hand on his head in disappointmentHuw Evans Picture Agency

Wales had promising attacking players coming through in the form of Harry Wilson, David Brooks and others but, when Johnson joined Spurs for £50m less than eight months after Bale’s departure, the scrutiny of his performances intensified.

While Wilson has thrived with the added responsibility and scored six goals in his 12 games under Bellamy, Johnson has the same tally from 40 caps.

Whether he has played in his favoured right wing position or as a centre-forward, Johnson has seemed lost; reluctant to take on opponents on some occasions, hesitant in shooting on others and often turning to play a safe pass backwards.

Former Wales captain Kath Morgan offered a blunt assessment after the Belgium defeat: “He’s a £50m player allegedly but, I’m sorry, what is his contribution to Wales? This is now consistently happening.”

Blake is also frustrated by his recent displays but strikes a more sympathetic tone.

“I think we just need to temper our expectations a bit,” he says.

“Since he broke into the first team at Forest and to now at Spurs, I don’t look at his game and say it’s developed that much.

What information do we collect from this quiz?

‘It’s not clear where he fits for Spurs’

While the spectre of Bale is inescapable with Wales, Johnson had another impossible act to follow at Spurs, joining in the same transfer window in which Harry Kane left for Bayern Munich.

“He came in at quite a weird time for the club. I’m not sure they really had a good plan for how to replace Kane,” says Jack Pitt-Brooke, who covers Tottenham for The Athletic.

“Johnson came in at a difficult moment but, with injuries to other players, he ended up playing tons that year and he was actually pretty good.”

It helped that it was then-Spurs boss Ange Postecoglou who signed Johnson, who scored 23 goals in all competitions during his first two seasons.

“He fitted what Ange wanted from wingers,” Pitt-Brooke adds. “Really high and wide, scoring goals where a winger goes down one side, pulls the ball back across the box, and the opposite side winger taps it in. Johnson was good at both delivering that cross, and also tapping it in at the far post.”

Under Postecoglou, Spurs won the Europa League – with Johnson scoring the winner in the final against Manchester United – but the Australian was sacked this summer after the club finished 17th in the Premier League.

Thomas Frank replaced him – and the Dane replaced Johnson with Kudus.

“Frank wants to play a different way, and he wants his wingers to do a lot more on the ball than just score tap-ins,” says Pitt-Brooke.

“Spurs paid £55m for Kudus, who doesn’t score many goals, but everything until he gets to the opposition goal is much better than Johnson.

“At the moment, I don’t think any Spurs fan would have Johnson in their first-choice team. It’s not really clear where he fits.”

Johnson has managed four goals in his 17 appearances in all competitions this season but, according to many supporters and pundits, does not offer much else.

“He doesn’t really do a lot apart from scoring goals,” says Pitt-Brooke. “There are obviously worse things to be than a guy who’s just known for scoring goals, but I think people would probably have expected him to have done more.

Brennan Johnson holds the Europa League trophy aloft at Tottenham Hotspur's victory parade in 2025Getty Images

Johnson does not face the same competition for his place with Wales, which is why his benching against Belgium was so striking, despite his indifferent form.

Although he prefers to play on the right, Johnson has played up front, but Oxford United’s Mark Harris – without a goal in 29 games for club and country – started as the centre-forward.

“That would have been a big punch in the solar plexus for Brennan,” says Blake. “In a game of that magnitude.”

Considering Wales needed to win to keep alive their hopes of qualifying automatically for the World Cup, this was a blunt message from Bellamy to Johnson, who only appeared as a substitute with half an hour to play.

When a rat made its way on to the pitch, Johnson was one of the players who tried to usher it off to the sidelines. Some Wales fans on social media joked that was his most telling contribution of the entire evening.

“He’s not being selected by Spurs, he’s not being selected for Wales, so there’s a big question mark on how you come back after that,” Blake adds.

“Regardless of what we say, it’s only Brennan who can get back on track and shut any social media noise up, shut any fan noise up.

“Fans are not haters. They’ll hate your guts for missing a chance but, a minute later, you score a goal, they absolutely adore you.”

Johnson will get a chance to win over the sceptics at some stage during these final two games of Wales’ World Cup qualifying group, particularly as their attacking options have been hit by striker Kieffer Moore’s withdrawal through injury.

Yet as Bellamy demonstrated against Belgium only last month, no matter how important the game or how famous the player, nobody is sure of their place.

“I feel for the lad because it’s not nice when the world is talking about you,” says Blake.

Related topics

  • Wales Men’s Football Team
  • Tottenham Hotspur
  • Football

Team Adam Peaty shed new light on bitter row after Holly Ramsay’s mother-in-law snub

Adam Peaty is set to marry Holly Ramsay, who is TV chef Gordon’s daughter, but his mother Caroline, a former nursery manager, has not been invited to the wedding

Adam Peaty’s family have been defended as “a normal hard-working bunch” in the bitter row surrounding his fiancée’s decision to snub his mother.

Sources have described those backing Holly Ramsay — such as her fans — as “unedifying” for taking aim at Adam’s family. It was brazenly suggested Holly, a 25-year-old model, had banned Caroline, 59, from her hen do because she “might have stuck out a bit”.

Now insiders close to Team Adam claim the group are just a “normal, ordinary” family who haven’t the influence or media access the Ramsay clan has. One source said: “It all seems rather unedifying for Team Ramsay to come out and throw around accusations about a normal, ordinary family like the Peatys. They (Ramsays) are able to look after themselves — they get the media, the fame game and have the staff in place to deal with these kinds of public feuds.

“The Peatys don’t. They are a normal hard-working bunch who have suddenly found themselves up against one of Britain’s richest and most influential families. It is all very sad, and there are two sides to every story. But you have to wonder if it’s a straight up-and-down case of Holly and Adam ditching his family.”

READ MORE: Adam Peaty’s family claims he is ‘ashamed’ of them after banning mother from weddingREAD MORE: Holly Ramsay’s row with Adam Peaty’s mum over dress before wedding invite heartache

Caroline, a former nursery manager from the market town of Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, had initially been invited to the wedding, it is thought. However, it is believed the row started when Caroline purchased a dress for the big day — only to be told Holly and Adam didn’t approve of it. They allegedly offered to buy her another outfit to wear that they would choose.

They planned a trip to Bath to find the new dress, but that fell apart after a recent knife attack in Cambridgeshire caused train cancellations, leaving Caroline and her husband Mark unable to travel.

Caroline was then not invited to the hen do, a lavish ceremony in Oxfordshire, and instead babysat her grandchild — from Adam’s previous relationship — at home. This — and the wedding snub — appears to have caused anger among those close to mum-of-four Caroline.

Article continues below

Yesterday, Adam’s aunt, Louise Williams, took aim at her in-laws, writing on social media: “The difference between me and a lot of people is that I’m not afraid to be disliked. I don’t give a f*** who you are supposed to be, think you are or who are you are connected to.”

US House to vote on full release of Epstein files next week, Johnson says

The United States House of Representatives will hold a vote to force the full disclosure of files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Speaker Mike Johnson has said.

Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that the House would hold a vote next week to require the Department of Justice to release all documents related to the disgraced financier.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

Johnson added that he wanted to “remind everybody” that the GOP-led Oversight Committee had been “working around the clock” on its own investigation into the case.

Johnson made the comments after Democratic lawmaker Adelita Grijalva, who was sworn in as the newest member of Congress on Wednesday, signed a petition to compel a House vote on the issue.

The bipartisan discharge petition – a mechanism allowing a majority of lawmakers to bypass the House leadership – was put forward by Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie and California Democrat Ro Khanna.

Grijalva won a special election to fill the Arizona seat held by her late father, Raul Grijalva, in September.

Johnson had refused to swear in the lawmaker as the chamber has been out of session since September 19, prompting a lawsuit by Arizona’s attorney general.

Grijalva and other Democrats said the delay was intended to prevent her from adding her signature to the Epstein petition.

Immediately after being sworn in, Grijalva signed the petition, giving it the required 218 signatures to progress.

Her co-signatories included all 214 House Democrats and four House Republicans – Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace.

Republicans have a narrow majority in the House, with 219 members.

In a speech on the House floor after taking her seat, Grijalva promised to continue her father’s legacy of advocating for progressive policies and ensure Congress provided a “full and check and balance” to President Donald Trump’s administration.

“We can and must do better. What is most concerning is not what this administration has done, but what the majority of this body has failed to do,” she said.

Grijalva’s second act in a busy first day on Capitol Hill was to vote with the majority of her Democratic colleagues to reject the Senate-passed legislation to reopen the government.

Lawmakers voted 222 to 209 in favour of moving the funding package to Trump’s desk for his signature, ending the longest federal government shutdown in history.

Jim McGovern, the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, had previously said he expected voting on the Epstein bill to take place in early December.

Johnson’s announcement of an earlier-than-expected vote hinted at growing frustration among Republican lawmakers, many of whom are facing growing scrutiny from within their own party, Democratic lawmakers and the American public over accusations they are protecting child abusers.

Tennessee Republican Tim Burchett told reporters on Wednesday that he was “tired of messing around” with the issue.

“The Democrats have had the Epstein files for four years, and now we’ve got it for nine months, and it’s going to be dragged into a bunch of nonsense. Let’s just take it to the floor. Let’s vote on it. Let’s get on with it,” he said.

A push on Wednesday by Burchett to force an expedited vote to release the files was blocked for not following proper legislative procedure.

In a video on X, Burchett blamed Democrats for blocking his efforts and accused them of “gamesmanship” over Epstein.

The vote also comes amid renewed scrutiny of Trump’s relationship with Epstein, after Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released new emails appearing to further link the pair on Wednesday.

In one such communication, Epstein told his former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year jail sentence for sex trafficking, that Trump had “spent hours” at his house with one victim.

The email, reportedly sent to Maxwell two years after Epstein had spent 13 months in prison for his sex crimes, also said, “I want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump.”

It was unclear what Epstein was referring to with his comments.

Epstein said Trump “knew about the girls” in another email sent in 2019.

Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump dismissed the emails as a “hoax”, accusing Democrats of being willing to “do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the Shutdown”.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also dismissed the emails, saying they “prove absolutely nothing other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong”.

Donald Trump’s message leaves Sharon Osbourne in tears after Ozzy’s death

The Osbourne family discussed the message from Donald Trump on the latest episode of The Osbournes podcast as they reflected on their own grief sinze Ozzy’s death

Sharon Osbourne got emotional when she heard a voicemail message from President Donald Trump.

Speaking about it on The Osbournes, their podcast, Sharon was joined by her son Jack, who has since joined I’m A Celebrity, and her daughter Kelly. This is the first time in more than a year that the whole family had recorded a podcast episode together.

On the episode of The Osbournes podcast they reflect on their own grief. Sharon admitted she had trouble sleeping since her husband died. Kelly added that the “mornings are the hardest for her” because she briefly forgets her father is dead.

READ MORE: Boy, 17, dies after falling from height at Harrow shopping centre

READ MORE: Shepton Mallet Carnival procession halted after person falls from cart

The public outpouring of grief for the Paranoid hitmaker has been “so helpful” to the Osbourne family, but Sharon admitted she doesn’t think Ozzy would have realised how much he meant to people.

On the latest podcast episode they played a voice note from Donald Trump in which he said: “Hi, Sharon – it’s Donald Trump, and I just wanted to wish you the best and the family,” the president said. “Ozzy was amazing – he was an amazing guy.

“I met him a few times and I wanna tell you he was unique in every way and talented.” The president wrapped up in saying, “So I just wanted to wish you the best and it’s a tough thing, I know how close you were, and whatever I can do – take care of yourself, say hello to the family – thanks, bye.”

Sharon said: “The thing is all I know is he has treated me with respect, your father with respect. He wanted nothing from us – nothing. Melania, the same, nothing.”

Jack chimed in saying Trump’s personal touch in comforting the grieving family in their time of need, he said: “Love him or hate him, he didn’t have to call and leave a voicemail.”

Article continues below