Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Archive March 25, 2025

NCS seizes N125m worth of smuggled petrol in largest bust in recent times

About 125, 000 litres of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), valued at about 125 million, have been seized in Kebbi State by Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) agents in a significant blow to fuel smugglers.

According to Persecondnews, this massive seizure, which was carried out as part of “Operation Whirlwind,” is the largest fuel bust since the initiative’s inception.

Fuel smuggling poses a significant economic threat, according to ACG Hissaini Ejibunu, the national coordinator of Operation Whirlwind, on Tuesday, contributing to revenue losses, artificial scarcity, and security risks.

According to Ejibunu, “We are committed to dismantling these smuggling networks,” “Fuel smuggling is a major economic threat.”

4 375 jerrycans, each 25 litre, and 54 200 litre drums, each contained the confiscated fuel.

Prior to being intercepted in Tsamiya, officers had been watching the trucks being loaded with the fuel. They were registered in the Republic of Benin.

The collaboration between the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) was credited with the operation’s success.

The officers’ vigilance was commended by Customs Comptroller-General Bashir Adeniyi, who also thanked Mr. Nuhu Ribadu, the country’s top economic crime advisor, for his leadership.

Adeniyi urged Nigerians to report suspicious activity in support of Customs’ anti-smuggling efforts.

“This operation demonstrates the effectiveness of inter-agency collaboration. We are still holding economic saboteurs accountable and destroying smuggling networks, Adeniyi said.

World Athletics Approves Swab Test To Determine Female Gender

The introduction of a cheek swab test to determine an athlete’s biological makeup was approved by World Athletics on Tuesday, according to a statement released on Tuesday.

The decision-making Council of the international track and field federation, according to Sebastian Coe, was a “really important” way to safeguard the female category.

In a press conference following the World Indoor Championships in Nanjing, China, Coe said, “It’s important to do it because it keeps everything that we’ve been talking about, especially recently, about actually guaranteeing the integrity of female women’s sport.”

We believe that this will give consumers confidence and keep the competition’s absolute focus on integrity.

Coe claimed that the decision was made following extensive discussion of the proposal.

Although he noted that the swab test was not deemed to be excessively intrusive, “overwhelmingly, the view has come back that this is absolutely the way to go.”

You acknowledge the fact that this is the world we live in, he said, confident that the policy would be upheld by legal challenges.

If I had been anything other than prepared to face the challenge head-on, I would never have chosen to pursue this path.

“Our DSD (difference of sex development) regulations have us going to the Court of Arbitration.”

They have been upheld, and after appeal, they have once more been upheld. So we will continue to fight for the female category and take all necessary steps to protect it.

Just in: Judge hands off Natasha’s case, cites Akpabio’s petition

With the resignation of Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, the legal dispute between suspended senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Nigerian Senate has taken a dramatic turn.

The judge announced that he would be stepping aside as a result of a petition that the judge filed against the judge, which alleged the judge was impartial, when the case was scheduled for hearing on Tuesday.

Egwuatu made a statement stating that he would turn over the case file to the Chief Judge, who would then designate a new judge.

The judge effectively halted the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from pursuing disciplinary actions against Akpoti-Uduaghan on March 4 according to Persecondnews’ previous reporting.

The senator is accused of breaking the Senate’s code of conduct and rules.

Egwuatu also provided the defendants with 72 hours to explain why the court shouldn’t launch an investigation into the Senator without violating the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, Senate Standing Order 2023, and Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act.

He gave the defendants’ attorneys permission to use substituted means to serve legal documents on them.

The court ordered that the legal documents be delivered either by posting them on the National Assembly’s premises or by handing them over to the clerk of the assembly.

Additionally, the court mandated that the documents be made available for public viewing through at least two national newspapers.

Following Akpoti-Uduaghan’s urgent application, the interim order was issued.

The Senate Committee convened in spite of the court’s ruling, which led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension.

Justice Egwuatu revised and revised his initial order after receiving the defendants’ requests.

He lifted the bar that the Senate could not pursue the senator’s legal challenge while the case was pending.

The court’s authority to interfere with Senate affairs was challenged by the legal team representing Akpabio, led by Mr. Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s heated argument sparked serious allegations of sexual harassment and defamation, which escalated to serious allegations of defamation and harassment against Akpabio.

Just in: Judge hands off Natasha’s case, cites Akpabio’s petition

With the resignation of Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, the legal dispute between suspended senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Nigerian Senate has taken a dramatic turn.

The judge announced that he would be stepping aside as a result of a petition that the judge filed against the judge, which alleged the judge was impartial, when the case was scheduled for hearing on Tuesday.

Egwuatu made a statement stating that he would turn over the case file to the Chief Judge, who would then designate a new judge.

The judge effectively halted the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from pursuing disciplinary actions against Akpoti-Uduaghan on March 4 according to Persecondnews’ previous reporting.

The senator is accused of breaking the Senate’s code of conduct and rules.

Egwuatu also provided the defendants with 72 hours to explain why the court shouldn’t launch an investigation into the Senator without violating the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, Senate Standing Order 2023, and Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act.

He gave the defendants’ attorneys permission to use substituted means to serve legal documents on them.

The court ordered that the legal documents be delivered either by posting them on the National Assembly’s premises or by handing them over to the clerk of the assembly.

Additionally, the court mandated that the documents be made available for public viewing through at least two national newspapers.

Following Akpoti-Uduaghan’s urgent application, the interim order was issued.

The Senate Committee convened in spite of the court’s ruling, which led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension.

Justice Egwuatu revised and revised his initial order after receiving the defendants’ requests.

He lifted the bar that the Senate could not pursue the senator’s legal challenge while the case was pending.

The court’s authority to interfere with Senate affairs was challenged by the legal team representing Akpabio, led by Mr. Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s heated argument sparked serious allegations of sexual harassment and defamation, which escalated to serious allegations of defamation and harassment against Akpabio.

Actor Depardieu Tells France Sex Abuse Trial He Doesn’t ‘Grope’ Women

Gerard Depardieu, a star of France and facing sexual assault charges, testified before a court in Paris on Tuesday that he had no habit of “groping” women.

“I don’t understand why I would grope a woman, her buttocks, and breasts all at once. In his first statement at the trial, where he is accused of sexual assault on two women while filming a movie in 2021, he said, “I’m not someone who rubs himself against others on the metro.”

Depardieu responded to the accusations that he was “not like that,” adding that “there are vices that are alien to me.”

Depardieu, 76, who has appeared in more than 200 movies and television shows, is the first woman to go on trial for allegedly abusing another 20 women.

Read more about the police’s investigation into an Osun communal collision with three suspects.

He is the most well-known actor to be accused of being a part of French cinema’s response to the #MeToo movement.

The jury is charged with sexual assault in connection with Jean Becker’s film “Les Volets Verts” (“The Green Shutters”)’ 2021 filming.

A 54-year-old set dresser and a 34-year-old assistant director, Anouk Grinberg, a well-known actor who appeared in the movie, have supported the two plaintiffs. Both women make allegations of sexual abuse.

Depardieu was repeatedly accused of making “salacious remarks” while filming, according to Grinberg, who claimed producers knew they were “hiring an abuser.”

Due to the actor’s poor health, the trial was originally scheduled to take place in October 2024.

His attorney claimed then that Depardieu had diabetes and had undergone a heart bypass procedure, which the stress of the upcoming trial had made them more anxious.

The 54-year-old set dresser Amelie, one of Depardieu’s two accusers, reported in February of last year that she had experienced sexual assault, harassment, and sexist insults while filming in September 2021.

She claimed Depardieu boasted to be able to “give women an orgasm without touching them” on French investigative website Mediapart and that he “brutally grabbed” her an hour later.

The actor pinned her by “closing his legs” around her, before groping her, going up to her breasts, and then closing his legs.

Depardieu, according to her, made “obscene remarks.”

Were Ferrari at fault or unlucky with disqualifications?

Graphic image of, from left to right, Alex Albon, George Russell, Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton, Lando Norris, Jack Doohan and Oliver Bearman. It is on a blue background with 'Fan Q&A' below the drivers
  • 1013 Comments

McLaren’s victory at the start of the season earned Oscar Piastri pole position and the victory in the Chinese Grand Prix.

Lando Norris placed second, completing the top three with George Russell’s Mercedes.

Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton won the sprint race on Saturday but he and team-mate Charles Leclerc were both disqualified from the main grand prix.

How long do you anticipate Red Bull will take to get Liam Lawson up to speed before switching? – Jon

Their patience appears to have run out, in some ways. This week, Red Bull will be discussing Lawson’s future, and it’s possible that he won’t compete in the upcoming Japanese Grand Prix.

If they go through with it, it will be regarded as a quite remarkable decision, which raises serious questions about the management at Red Bull Racing.

Let’s go back and explain why.

Sergio Perez was signed to a two-year contract extension with the Red Bull team in May of last year, ending his 2026 contract there.

This was despite the fact that the Mexican was struggling as Max Verstappen’s team-mate, and that the 2024 season looked to be going the same way as the year before – a bright start from Perez, and then an alarming slump in form.

Carlos Sainz, who had left Ferrari to sign Lewis Hamilton, might have been a free agent. However, he remembered the tensions between the Sainz and Verstappen camps at Toro Rosso in 2015 and made up his mind to return.

Re-signing Perez, Horner’s theory went, would give him the confidence to recover his form.

The strategy was utterly unsuccessful. Despite Verstappen winning a fourth world title by 63 points, Perez’s performances fell off a cliff, and the team fell to third place in the constructors’ championship.

Verstappen only won twice in the final 14 races of the year because the car lost competitiveness and became difficult to drive. So do Perez’s difficulties.

However, Helmut Marko, Horner, and Helmut Marko, the team’s motorsport adviser, decided Perez had had his day and needed to change.

They paid him off – to the tune of many millions of dollars – and signed Lawson.

Because they thought he had a mental toughness lacking the Japanese, they chose the New Zealander over Yuki Tsunoda, their much more experienced team-mate at the junior Racing Bulls team.

The season has started badly for Lawson. He qualified 18th at the season-opener in Melbourne, where he crashed out of the race, and last in both the sprint and grand prix in China, failing to make much progress in either event.

Verstappen, however, struggles at least partially, too. He does not conceal his belief that the car is the top four teams, as he did in China, where he made a strong suggestion that it might not be as fast as the Racing Bull.

The Red Bull is nervous on corner entry, has mid-corner understeer and is snappy on exits. And it doesn’t seem to the team to be able to fix it.

Verstappen enjoys a sharp front end, but he doesn’t want the car to act in this way. But he can cope, and get a lap time out of it. Lawson is unable to, at least not at this point.

Lawson spoke in Chinese as though he already recognized the writing on the wall.

“It’s just (got) a very small window”, he said. You know, driving is difficult, but it’s “hard” to get it in that window. With the passage of time, I’d like to say that I simply don’t have the time to do that. It’s something I need to get on top of”.

The management will need to do some serious explaining if Red Bull decides to drop him after two races.

They will be questioned if signing him in December was the wise choice. Why is that the case now? If Tsunoda is the driver replacing him, the question becomes even starker.

That’s probably too early if they instead choose Frenchman Isack Hadjar, who impressed as Tsunoda’s rookie team-mate in the first two grands prix.

Why blame the driver, if the car appears to be the first-order culprit, as it should be?

Getty Images

Ferrari was responsible for the double disqualification, but was it simply unlucky and out of their control? – Ozan

Formula 1 is a frontier-living organism. Teams must push their cars as far as they can within the technical regulations as they can to win because that is what everyone is doing.

The line between success and failure is so fine. And two of the main performance differences are ride height and weight.

In Formula One, one kilogram of extra weight costs about 0.0335 per lap. Multiply that by the 56 laps of the Chinese Grand Prix, for example, and it’s two seconds of race time. Not much, but it could determine whether you win or not, or whether you are better or worse.

That serves only as an example of why cars are edged. And when you run to the edge, mistakes can happen.

On Sunday, Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari was found to be 1 kg underweight.

Ferrari attributed this to the switch to a one-stop strategy, which meant the car ran the race with less tyre rubber than the anticipated two-stop, and that marked the difference between exceeding the maximum weight limit and falling below it.

Of course, other teams also switched to a one-stop, without ending up underweight. Mercedes and George Russell faced the same fate last year in Belgium after being disqualified for victory.

Lewis Hamilton’s skid blocks were too worn. Again, it’s the sort of thing that can happen – indeed, it happened to Hamilton when he was at Mercedes in the 2023 US Grand Prix, and Leclerc in the same race.

Again, it’s about limiting the options. As long as teams can maintain aerodynamic stability, the lower these current cars can typically be driven, creating the most downforce.

But run them too low, and they risk wearing the floor excessively – and that’s what happened.

Aside from the McLaren, who has impressed you the most at this very early stage? – SJM

The season has already started off very well for Racing Bulls. Tsunoda qualified fifth in Australia, and his team-mate Hadjar was seventh on the grid and Tsunoda ninth in China.

Although the cars have fared a little wrong, Verstappen even suggested that it was superior to the Red Bull in China.

Racing Bulls use a good deal of Red Bull components, but since Red Bull have started to struggle, it may not be as much as it once did in theory when rival rivals worried about the close relationship between the two teams.

In the cockpit, Hadjar, notwithstanding his crash on the formation lap in Australia, has made a strong first impression.

Racing Bulls' Isack Hadjar leads team-mate Yuki Tsunoda around a corner during the Chinese Grand PrixGetty Images

How did Lewis Hamilton’s sprint and qualifying times differ so much? Or how did the other drivers close the gap in such a short space of time? – Ash

There are several reasons for this. Ferrari hit the ground running in China and landed on a decent set-up for sprint qualifying in the single practice session before it.

Hamilton also gave a fantastic performance on a track where he has always done well to take pole.

However, other teams involved had some underachievement.

The McLaren was the fastest car in China and Oscar Piastri was more comfortable in it than Lando Norris. In sprint qualifying, both teams finished third and sixth on the grid.

At the first corner, Hamilton converted pole to lead, and he then made the most of the opening opportunity.

He drove superbly, but he was protected from Piastri for much of the race by Verstappen, who the Australian did not pass until four laps from the end, by which time Hamilton had built a lead too big to overhaul.

After the sprint, the teams can switch up their setups, and it appears that a more natural order has already been established by the time of the grand prix qualifying.

According to Hamilton, “We had a pretty decent car in the sprint, and then we made some changes to try to move forward and improve the car, but it ultimately made it worse going into qualifying and then it was even worse in the race.”

Among those changes seems to have been lifting the car slightly, which Hamilton more or less confirmed after the race: “I don’t know who said we lifted the car, but we made some other changes, mostly, as well as that, but not massively, just small amounts”.

Even though Leclerc had a damaged front wing, he was faster than Hamilton in the grand prix. And Hamilton’s car still wore the skid blocks too much despite the modifications. Hence his disqualification.

Is it possible that all information is passed by radio or telemetry as the drivers enter the pit wall? – Phil

The only useful information about the drivers is that pit boards provide, primarily laps left, with other important information. The front and back drivers’ gaps are frequently included as well.

They’re also there as a back-up in case the radio fails.

Get in touch

Related topics

  • Formula 1