Archive May 7, 2025

Barcelona’s Martinez denies spitting at Acerbi

Images courtesy of Getty

Inigo Martinez, a Barcelona defender, has denied spitting at Francesco Acerbi during their Champions League semifinal defeat.

Acerbi allegedly ran past Martinez as he celebrated Hakan Calhanoglu’s penalty in the second leg of Inter’s 2-0 lead at half-time on Tuesday at the San Siro.

“He snarled in my ear,” I said. Martinez told El Chiringuito TV, “I never spat at him, even though it was unnecessary.”

Before furiously confronting Martinez, Acerbi remonstrated with referee Szymon Marciniak.

There was a potential red card review conducted by the video assistant referee (VAR) before play resumed, but no decision was made.

Later footage showed Martinez spitting in Acerbi’s direction.

After Acerbi scored a dramatic stoppage-time equalizer to make it 3-3, Inter broke up in a thrilling tie 4-3 and 7-6 on aggregate after extra time.

related subjects

  • Barcelona
  • Football in Europe
  • Inter Milan
  • UEFA Champions League
  • Football

The Nolans’ cruel ‘cancer curse’ as another tragedy strikes family with devastating death

Linda Nolan’s stepson, who was suffering from metastatic throat cancer, has sadly died four months after the singer passed away. We take a look the disease’s impact on the family

The famous family has been struck by cancer again and again(Image: Daily Mirror)

Another sad death in the Nolan family has been announced today – Linda Nolan’s stepson Lloyd Hudson, the son of Linda’s late husband Brian Hudson. Lloyd was diagnosed with throat cancer in September 2023 and with his tumour too large and close to his vocal cords, surgery was ruled out.

The sad news comes four months after Linda, 65, died after contracting double pneumonia following her own courageous journey with cancer. The singer had been supporting Lloyd as he underwent an intense round of radiotherapy.

“They were fighting side by side,” a family friend told The Mirror. “Linda would finish her treatment and text him to check in. They joked about their meds, shared their side effects, cried together too. Linda really thought he’d outlive her. She needed that belief.”

Lloyd’s father Brian, whom Linda was married to for 26 years, also tragically died in 2007 following a fight with the cruel disease.

READ MORE: Linda Nolan’s brother Brian reveals cancer diagnosis just weeks after her death

Lloyd had throat cancer and was supported by Linda as he underwent radiotherapy (Image: Facebook)

In March, Brian Nolan, big brother to the Nolan sisters, was the latest in the famous family to reveal he has cancer. The 69-year-old was told he had prostate cancer just three days after the funeral of Linda, which he had courageously helped to plan despite his own ordeal.

Article continues below

The news was the latest ‘cancer curse’ for the singer siblings, who lost Bernie Nolan, 52, to breast cancer in 2013 before Linda died on January 15 following a twenty-year battle with the disease. Anne, 74, was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000 and Coleen, 60, learned she had skin cancer in 2023.

“I just want cancer to leave us alone,” said Brian, who went to his GP with urinary issues in November and following his diagnosis, was preparing to undergo surgery to remove his prostate gland. “The urologist stood up and said: ‘We’re going to treat this and we’re going to cure this’. I’m focusing on that and hope to god I can have the courage my sisters had.”

“I couldn’t speak,” said Loose Women star Coleen of being told her brother had cancer. “I went completely numb and about an hour later I wanted to punch walls and scream. In our family, cancer’s just there. But Brian was so positive and I’m just so proud of him.”

Coleen Nolan on Loose Women
Coleen revealed she had been diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma on her shoulder and melanoma on her face(Image: Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

Brian kept his cancer fears secret for months as his sister Linda’s condition deteriorated, to protect his siblings from further anguish. The singer was first told she had the disease in 2005 and went into remission a year later. But in 2017, she devastatingly announced she had been diagnosed with a secondary cancer in her hip, which spread to her liver in 2020.

Three years later, the cancer had spread to her brain. The Daily Mirror Columnist passed away with her sisters at her side and her final moments were said to have been full of ‘love and comfort’.

Their father, Tommy Nolan Sr, was the first to be struck by the cruel disease, dying from cancer in 1998. Bernie, Anne, Linda and Coleen later faced diagnoses. “You almost feel like it’s a curse that’s been on you but it’s not. So many families go through this,” said Coleen in an emotional episode of Piers Morgan’s Life Stories in 2021.

In an exclusive interview as he awaits lifesaving surgery, Brian told how his family, with siblings Tommy, 77, Denise, 72, and Maureen, 70, making up the clan, have been referred to a genetic clinic for testing.

These days, much is known about the factors that can increase an individual’s risk, but why is it that the killer condition all too often targets entire families? Here, we take a look at the family’s history with cancer as an expert geneticist explains why some families might see similar cases of cancer among members, even if they test negative for well-known genetic defaults such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 faulty genes, known as the ‘Jolie Gene.’

Linda Nolan opened up about her devastating journey with cancer and chemo
Linda Nolan opened up about her devastating journey with cancer and chemo(Image: Andy Stenning/Daily Mirror)

According to Cancer Research UK, most families will have at least one person who has or has had cancer. But having a couple of relatives diagnosed with cancer doesn’t mean there is a cancer gene fault running in the family. In families with an inherited faulty gene, there is usually a pattern of specific types of cancer. The strength of your family history depends on: who in your family has had cancer; the types of cancer they have had; how old they were at diagnosis; how closely related the relatives with cancer are to each other.

The more relatives who have had the same or related types of cancer, and the younger they were at diagnosis, the stronger someone’s family history is, with it being more likely that the cancers are being caused by an inherited faulty gene. In the case of the Nolan family, who rose to fame after forming the girl group The Nolans in 1974, they have experienced similar cancers. Anne was the first sister to be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000.

The star was then diagnosed with stage three breast cancer 20 years later in April 2020 and is now in remission after receiving the all-clear. Just days after her second diagnosis, her younger sister Linda found out about her liver cancer – a cancer that their father died from.

Nolan sisters Coleen, Maureen, Bernie and Linda performing in 1981
Nolan sisters Coleen, Maureen, Bernie and Linda performing in 1981(Image: Andre Csillag/REX/Shutterstock)

This came after Linda was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2005. While she underwent gruelling treatment, her beloved husband Brian Hudson died from skin cancer aged just 60. Brian had worked as the Nolans’ tour manager until 1983 and became his wife’s manager after she left the group.

Having lost her husband of 26 years, Linda was left in a deep depression while living with breast cancer but was given the all-clear in 2006. But the disease devastatingly returned as incurable secondary breast cancer in her hip in 2017. It was in 2020 that she was found to be suffering from liver cancer. Then, doctors found two sizable tumours surrounded by smaller ones in her brain in 2023.

Meanwhile, their late sister Bernie announced she had been diagnosed with breast cancer in April 2010. In October of the same year, Bernie was declared cancer-free following a mastectomy, chemotherapy and treatment with Herceptin. She announced in February 2012 that she was no longer taking cancer treatment drugs.

However, by the end of October 2012, Bernie’s cancer had returned. Doctors told the singer that the disease returned to her left breast, brain, lungs, liver and bones. The star passed at her home in Surrey in July 2013 aged just 52.

In 2023 it was revealed that Loose Women presenter Coleen, 58, had been diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma on her shoulder and melanoma on her face. Speaking with the Mirror in 2020, Linda confirmed that she, Anne, and Bernie tested negative for the BRCA gene mutation.

“Anne had breast cancer first in 2000, then me in 2006, then Bernie in 2010. Then we tested for the BRCA gene mutation and we don’t have it, but they did say we’ll have a rogue gene somewhere – it’s just one they haven’t found out about yet. They took our blood so they could use it for testing.

Bernie Nolan
Bernie Nolan died from breast cancer in 2013(Image: Getty Images Europe)

“It’s weird because the doctor said it’s not just bad luck that three sisters have got breast cancer. There’s something not right there, so for the other girls it’s very scary. They’re doubly aware of checking themselves because they could have this gene that we don’t know about.”

Speaking to The Mirror, consultant clinical geneticist at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Terri McVeigh, explained how families can inherit an alteration in genes that increases their risk of cancer, although some faults are too tricky to test with the current technology.

“Genes are tiny chunks of the DNA genetic code that we inherit from each of our parents. They are tiny structures inside our cells, that carry instructions to make proteins that carry out different jobs in the body,” Dr McVeigh explains. “We normally have two copies of most genes, one of which we inherit from our mother and the other which we inherit from our father. We have about 20,000 different genes. Some of these genes work to protect against the development of cancer – called tumour suppressors.

Anne Nolan and her sister Linda walking in support of Bernie
Anne Nolan and her sister Linda walking in support of Bernie(Image: Sunday Mirror)

“Certain individuals are born with an inherited risk of cancer, because of an inherited alteration (also known as a variant or mutation) in one of these genes. In people where one copy of the gene is already broken, a cell only has to lose the one remaining copy for cells to start growing unrestrained and for cancer to develop. People from certain ethnic backgrounds may also be at higher cancer risk because some groups have had more genetic changes concentrated in their population over the generations.

“Genetic testing is useful in such families as it can help us identify those relatives at higher risk of developing cancer, and, importantly, allow us to take actions to try to facilitate early detection, or prevention where possible. Very often, even if we suspect a hereditary cause of cancer, genetic testing doesn’t identify a genetic alteration.

“A result like this cannot fully exclude the possibility that there may still be inherited risk factors in a family – there may be alterations in genes we don’t routinely test yet, or there may be tricky parts of the gene that cannot be easily tested by current technology.” Dr McVeigh also highlighted how non-genetic risk factors can come into play, such as shared environmental exposures. In cases where a genetic alteration isn’t identified, doctors may recommend extra screening depending on the family history.

Nolan sisters and families unite with Linda for one last holiday together sisters at centre from left Denise, Coleen, Linda, Maureen and Anne.
The Nolans have a family history of cancer(Image: Andy Stenning/Daily Mirror)

At the Royal Marsden, a screening programme has begun to detect so-called germline cancer predisposition genes in high-risk populations before a cancer develops, so that patients with a mutated gene can be followed to make sure a tumour is detected early.

The NHS England Genomic Medicine service also offers genetic testing of patients who have already developed cancer. The expert adds: “Cancer genetics is a really rapidly moving area of medicine, and there may be an opportunity for additional genetic testing in the future as our knowledge grows.”

Cancer Research UK warns that you may have a strong family history if some of the following situations apply to you: cancers developed when the family members were young, multiple close relatives on the same side of your family have had cancer, the relatives have had the same type of cancer, or different cancers that can be caused by the same gene fault, one of your relatives has had a gene fault found by genetic tests.

Nicola Smith, senior health information manager at Cancer Research UK, said: “Only roughly 5-10 per cent of cancer diagnoses are linked to an inherited faulty gene from a parent.

Article continues below

“Faulty genes aren’t always passed on to children, but even when they are it doesn’t mean that a person will definitely get cancer – they just have a higher risk of developing particular types of cancer than other people. It’s a much less common cause of cancer than ageing or other factors, such as smoking.

“However, if people are concerned that they have a strong family history of cancer – for example, if multiple relatives have had the same type of cancer at a young age – then they can talk to their GP. If the doctor thinks that someone might be at increased risk, they can refer them to a genetics clinic.”

Why are artificial football pitches unpopular?

Artificial football pitches – made primarily of plastic – have several significant drawbacks that make them widely unpopular at elite level.

Though the surfaces have improved dramatically since the 1980s, there is a perception of increased risk of injury, plus an impact on a team’s style of play and – more broadly – the environment.

Artificial pitches tend to be harder than real grass, which can increase the risk of injury to players.

Turning is made harder on the knees and ankles by the tougher ground, and falls can lead to heavier, more damaging impacts.

In 2022, then Roma manager Jose Mourinho blamed the surface after defender Gianluca Mancini was injured during a Europa Conference League match with Bodo/Glimt.

Tottenham visit the Norwegian side in the Europa League on Thursday.

“The thing that worries me the most is the injury for Mancini,” Mourinho said after a 2-1 defeat. “It’s something caused by playing on plastic turf.”

Bodo defender Odin Bjortuft believes the pitch will help his side as they try and overturn a 3-1 first-leg deficit.

“There’s no doubt it is an advantage for us,” said Bjortuft. “We train on this pitch every day. I don’t think a lot of teams are prepared for what’s coming.

Getty Images

Manchester United defender Luke Shaw has been critical of artificial surfaces in the past.

Speaking after a Champions League defeat by Young Boys in 2021, he told TNT Sport: “These pitches, they shouldn’t be possible. It’s dangerous. It’s hard to turn on.

“It’s artificial grass… you can’t turn properly… it’s not good for the knees.”

Despite the criticism from those playing and managing on the surfaces, research in the British Journal of Sports Medicine concluded there was no evidence of a greater risk of injury on artificial turf when compared with natural grass.

However, the pitches can lead to differences in the way the ball moves, typically rendering play slower because of increased friction.

Get in touch

Why do some teams use plastic pitches?

Plastic pitches are common in Northern Europe, where cold temperatures mean maintaining true grass surfaces to a high enough standard is very difficult.

They have been banned in the professional game in England since 1998, though there are more than 5,000 across the UK at amateur level.

In Scotland they are allowed throughout the leagues, though they will be banned in the Scottish top flight from the 2026-27 season.

National League South side Dorking Wanderers have played on an artificial pitch since 2018.

“Our home form was particularly poor this year,” White told BBC Sport. “The surface has quite a big impact on the style of football.

“The problem is the pitches have a varying degree of quality. No-one has quite worked out what a good one is.

“They are still playing around with different manufacturers and different countries. Some artificial pitches play really quickly and some really slowly. It can have a big impact on football. You don’t get the natural ball movement that you get on grass.

“We sustained a lot more injuries on the artificial pitch than we do grass. Purley down to the movement of players.”

So why do Dorking have one?

“It’s not just financial,” he said. “It’s to do with the community. There are a lack of resources across the UK for kids’ football, especially now that girls’ and ladies’ football has taken off so much.

Marc White pictured shouting instructions to his Dorking playersGetty Images

What are plastic pitches made of?

Artificial surfaces are often called ‘3G pitches’ – referencing the third generation of the technology.

The false ‘grass’ is made of stitched-together plastic fibres, typically polyethylene or polypropylene, placed on top of a base layer of rubber for shock absorption.

Sand or small crumbs of rubber made from old tyres are added between the fibres to improve grip.

In 2024, a report called for the development of plastic pitches to be halted over concerns some of the chemicals used in rubber crumbs could be cancerous. The European Commission set a target of 2031 for a ban on use of the rubber crumbs, but the UK government has made no announcement.

A close-up shot of a plastic football pitch used by Derry City in the League of Ireland.Getty Images

Why are plastic football pitches bad for the environment?

Performance issues are not the only concern plastic pitches bring. Artificial surfaces are also considered a significant negative for the environment.

Those rubber crumbs are easily lodged in the clothing and footwear of players, as any amateur five-a-side player will attest. Those crumbs often end up either in landfill after being thrown out with household waste, or in the waterways after being flushed down drains.

Black rubber crumbs hit bounce up from the ground after the ball hits the turf on an artificial football pitch.Getty Images

More questions answered…

Related topics

  • Football

India-Pakistan deadly fighting forces airlines to re-route, cancel flights

Due to the two neighboring nations’ worst exchange of fire in the last 20 years, several Asian airlines have announced they are rerouting or cancelling flights to and from India and Pakistan.

According to navigational information, the airspace over northern India and southern Pakistan had been completely cleared on Wednesday. With the exception of a few flights, Pakistan’s entire airspace was essentially free of civilian aircraft.

Through air navigation tracking sites, Sanad, Al Jazeera’s verification agency, tracked Indian military aircraft over northern India and a government aircraft in southern Pakistan. This occurred just before the airspace was completely cleared, and it caused several flights to depart Pakistan for Pakistan.

52 flights to and from Pakistan were canceled as of Wednesday morning, according to FlightRadar24, a global flight monitoring service.

When India struck, 57 international flights and flights were taking place in Pakistan’s airspace, according to a Pakistani army spokesman.

Only two international flights have been reported so far at Karachi’s airport following an eight-hour suspension for heightened tensions.

Both countries experienced delays to other domestic flights.

Due to the airport closures caused by the tensions with Pakistan, Air India canceled flights to and from Jammu, Srinagar, Leh, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Amritsar, Bhuj, Jamnagar, Chandigarh, and Rajkot.

Flights would be suspended until at least May 10 according to India’s flagship airline.

In its northern region, India has also shut down a number of airports. Additionally, flights to 10 cities in northern and northern India close to the Pakistani border were canceled by other airlines like IndiGo, SpiceJet, and Akasa Air.

Middle Eastern and South Asia operations are already impacted by conflict in the two regions because of the changing airline schedules.

International airlines impacted

After Pakistan’s airspace was closed, Malaysia’s flagship airline, Malaysian Airlines, has since canceled flights to Amritsar, India, and rerouted two long-haul flights.

Meanwhile, Batik Air in Indonesia announced that it had canceled a number of flights to and from Amritsar, India’s and Lahore, Pakistan.

KLM, a Dutch airline, announced that it would not be flying over Pakistan until further notice. Singapore Airlines also announced that it has no longer flys over Pakistani airspace as of May 6.

EVA Air, a Taiwanese airline, said it would adjust its flights to and from Europe to prevent India and Pakistan’s airspace from getting stale.

On Wednesday, Korean Air announced that it had begun switching the routes connecting Seoul Incheon-Dubai and Dubai, choosing a southern route that bypasses Pakistani airspace and passes through Myanmar, Bangladesh, and India.

Vietnam Airlines reported that its flight plans were impacted by tensions between India and Pakistan, while Thai Airways announced that flights to destinations in Europe and South Asia would be rerouted beginning early on Wednesday morning.

Flights from Taiwan’s China Airlines to and from locations like London, Frankfurt, and Rome were canceled, with some having to make technical stops in Bangkok and Prague to refuel and change pilots before reversing flight paths.

Some flights from India to Europe were also observed traveling longer distances.

According to FlightRadar24, Lufthansa’s flights from Delhi to Frankfurt departed from Surat, which is located near the western Indian city of Surat, taking a longer route than Tuesday.

Yemen’s Houthis say attacks on Israel not in ceasefire deal in ‘any way’

The group’s top negotiator has stated that no operations against Israel are included in the ceasefire agreement between Yemen’s Houthis and the United States.

Abu Dhabi’s Mohammed Abdulsalam claimed on Wednesday that the Oman-mediated agreement did not include attacking Israel in “any way, shape or form.”

The deal was made public shortly after Israeli fighter jets attacked Yemen’s Sanaa airport. According to airport director Khaled al-Shaief, “environ $500 million in losses were caused by the Israeli aggression at the airport,” he told Al Masirah on Wednesday.

US President Donald Trump made the announcement a day earlier, stating that any attacks on Yemen against the Houthis would end right away once the organization had agreed to stop pursuing ships in the Red Sea.

According to Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi, “efforts have been made to de-escalate the two sides’ negotiations have led to a ceasefire agreement,” according to a statement released on Tuesday.

In the Red Sea, he continued, “Neither side will target the other, ensuring freedom of navigation and the smooth flow of international commercial shipping.”

shipping-related attacks

In solidarity with Palestinians who are under siege in the Red Sea, the Houthis have targeted Israel and vessels in the region since Israel began to invade Gaza in October 2023.

The Houthis halted their attacks during the liminal ceasefire in Gaza earlier this year, but they resumed in full force as a result of Israel’s decision to impose a total blockade on the enclave in early March.

The group threatened to resume shipping attacks, which had been suspended since January, leading to the US military’s response by conducting near-daily airstrikes.

Trump, however, stated that the Houthis “don’t want to fight any more” when they announced the agreement on Tuesday.

He continued, “And we will honor that, and we will stop the bombings, and they have capitulated.”

They claim that the purpose of what we were doing was to stop them from destroying ships any longer.

However, Abdulsalam informed Al Masirah TV, a news agency affiliated with the Houthi, that any US action would result in a decision as a result of the agreement.

We will resume our strikes if the American enemy resumes its attacks, he declared.

The dark experience the United States had in Yemen, he continued, is the true guarantee of the agreement.

Mahdi al-Mashat, a leader of the Houthis, added that attacks on Israel “will continue” and go “beyond what the Israeli enemy can endure.”

Eight people were hurt in a ballistic missile attack by the Houthis at Ben Gurion International Airport on Sunday, causing damage to a road, a vehicle, and forcing air traffic to halt.

‘High risks’: Indian attacks in Pakistan raise fears of wider conflict

New Delhi, India – In the first hours of Wednesday, Indian armed forces said they struck nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, where residents woke up to loud explosions, as the nuclear-armed rivals edged to the precipice of a full-blown military conflict.

New Delhi said its missiles precisely targeted “terrorist infrastructure” across the border while demonstrating “considerable restraint”. The Indian Army, in a statement, said the attack was “non-escalatory in nature” and pointed out that Pakistani military facilities were deliberately not targeted.

Yet a fuming Islamabad claimed that Indian attacks in six Pakistani cities killed at least 8 civilians, including two children. Pakistani ministers also claimed that the country’s air force had shot down several Indian military jets.

India’s missile attacks – called Operation Sindoor – were the country’s response to the deadly April 22 attack in Indian-administered-Kashmir’s Pahalgam, in which 26 people were killed. India blamed Pakistan for that attack, while Islamabad denied it had any role. Since then, Indian armed forces have combed the forests near Pahalgam, arrested more than 2,000 people and raided homes in an unsuccessful manhunt for the gunmen who fled after shooting tourists dead.

The May 7 attacks on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir offer Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi a chance to bolster his strongman image at home, analysts told Al Jazeera. But the Indian government’s emphasis on signalling “restraint” points to an attempt to balance that domestic message with a different narrative for the rest of the world.

Amid it all stands an undisputed fact, say analysts: India’s attacks have raised the risks of the region spiralling into a wider conflict.

‘Concerning development’

The Indian attacks were the most expansive since the neighbours last fought a full-fledged war in 1971 – a time when neither had nuclear weapons at their disposal as they do now.

Of the six places that Indian missiles struck, two are cities – Muzaffarabad and Kotli – in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The region of Kashmir – one of the world’s most militarised zones – is claimed in full, and ruled in parts, by India and Pakistan, who have fought three wars over it.

But the other four targets that India struck are in Punjab -Bahawalpur, Muridke, Sialkot and Shakar Garh. Among them, Bahawalpur falls in southern Punjab province, facing the Thar desert, while Muridke is just next to Lahore, Pakistan’s second-largest city, with a population of 14 million.

The Indian military has not hit Punjab, Pakistan’s economic heartland that is also home to 60 percent of the country’s population, since 1971.

Indian air attacks since then have mostly targeted remote parts of Pakistan or Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Six years ago, Indian jets fired missiles at Balakot in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, after a suicide bomber killed at least 40 Indian paramilitary soldiers in Indian-administered Kashmir.

These May 7 attacks are different. Lahore, next to Muridke, is close to the Indian border and is Pakistan’s second-most populous city, pointed out Sumantra Bose, an Indian political scientist whose work focuses on the intersection of nationalism and conflict in South Asia. Bahawalpur, in southern Punjab, is also a key city.

The Indian government claims that it strategically hit only “terror infrastructure”. And in a post on X, the Indian army said, “Justice is served.”

But Bose said the attacks were “a very concerning development”.

“Surgically targeted precision strikes do not change the fact that there have been these large explosions in major Pakistani population centres,” said Bose. “This is proper Pakistan, not Pakistan-administered-Kashmir [claimed by India].”

‘Likely domestic dividends’ for Modi

Two days after the Pahalgam attack, Modi said, in an address at an election rally in the poll-bound state of Bihar, that his government would “identify, trace, and punish every terrorist and their backers”, promising to pursue them “to the ends of the Earth”.

Following the attack, India suspended its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) that Pakistan counts on for its water security. Islamabad has threatened to walk out of past peace deals. Both nations have also expelled each other’s diplomats, military attaches and hundreds of civilians.

But there has been growing domestic pressure on the Modi government, said political analysts, to attack Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack.

“There was a high level of pressure on Modi to respond with muscle,” said Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, DC. “It would have been unfathomable for India’s government not to respond militarily, given Modi’s self-projection as an administrator who is strong, confident, decisive, determined to hit back hard against terrorism.”

Rasheed Kidwai, a political analyst in New Delhi, said the Pahalgam attack had “emotionally” driven a desire in the Indian public for retribution against the attackers and those seen as their enablers. And Modi, with his image as someone who delivers on national security, was catering to those sentiments. “India is retaliating in a precise manner,” Kidwai said.

In many ways, the May 7 Indian missile attacks were in keeping with the script New Delhi had outlined since the April 22 killings in Pahalgam, said Praveen Donthi, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group.

Like Kugelman and Kidwai, Donthi referred to the image that the Modi government has created for itself domestically. “This moment aligns with India’s self-projection as a strong security state with zero tolerance for terrorism, primarily directed against Pakistan, and Modi’s strongman persona. It was a self-created litmus test that the Indian government needed to ace,” he told Al Jazeera. “There are likely domestic dividends for it.”

But, Donthi warned, the Indian attack on Pakistan also “portends future risks”.

Kugelman agreed, describing the Wednesday missile attacks as “the most intense levels of Indian military actions we’ve seen in Pakistan for quite a few years now”.

What’s next?

Back in Pakistan, as officials pledge retaliation against what they call India’s “act of war”, Kugelman said the situation suits Islamabad’s military leadership, too.

The attacks “will actually bolster Pakistan’s current regime because the military leadership can use these attacks to rally the public around the military leadership,” he said. “The military has tended to derive its legitimacy from this idea that it needs to protect the country from the threat posed by India. We could see a rally around the flag effect [in Pakistan].”

Since the Indian attack, both armies have traded heavy artillery and gunfire across the de facto border in disputed Kashmir. Currently, Kugelman said, there is “a pretty strong possibility of escalation, given that both countries have nuclear weapons”.

“The more hostilities that are used through conventional military force under a nuclear umbrella, the higher the risk of nuclear escalation.