Archive December 13, 2025

US forces stormed cargo ship travelling from China to Iran: Report

United States forces raided a cargo ship travelling from China to Iran last month, according to the Wall Street Journal, in the latest reported instance of increasingly aggressive maritime tactics by the administration of US President Donald Trump.

Unnamed officials told the newspaper that US military personnel boarded the ship several hundred miles from Sri Lanka, according to the report on Friday. It was the first time in several years US forces had intercepted cargo travelling from China to Iran, according to the newspaper.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The operation took place in November, weeks before US forces seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela earlier this week, citing sanctions violations. It was another action Washington has not taken in years.

US Indo-Pacific Command did not immediately confirm the report. An official told the newspaper that they seized material “potentially useful for Iran’s conventional weapons”. However, the official noted the seized items were dual-use, and could have both military and civilian applications.

Officials said the ship was allowed to proceed following the interdiction, which involved special operation forces.

Iran remains under heavy US sanctions. Neither Iran nor China immediately responded to the report, although Beijing, a key trading partner with Tehran, has regularly called the US sanctions illegal.

Earlier in the day, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun condemned the seizure of the oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, which was brought to a port in Texas on Friday.

The action came amid a wider military pressure campaign against Venezuela, which Caracas has charged is aimed at toppling the government of leader Nicolas Maduro.

Beijing “opposes unilateral illicit sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction that have no basis in international law or authorisation of the UN Security Council, and the abuse of sanctions”, Guo said.

Salah In Liverpool Squad For Brighton After Slot Talks – Reports

Mohamed Salah has been included in Liverpool’s squad for their Premier League match at home to Brighton on Saturday following talks with manager Arne Slot, according to several British media reports.

READ ALSO: Salah Opens Door To Liverpool Exit With ‘Thrown Under The Bus’ Rant

Both the BBC and Sky said the decision was made with Slot, who had made it clear he would have the final say on whether to recall Salah, wanting to act in the best interests of the club.

The Dutchman had previously said he would speak to Salah on Friday morning following the Egypt striker’s outburst last weekend that raised doubts about his Anfield future and saw him omitted from the squad that travelled to Italy for a Champions League win over Inter Milan in midweek.

Under The Bus

Salah accused Liverpool of throwing him “under the bus” after he was left on the bench for last week’s 3-3 draw at Leeds — the third match in a row that he did not start.

He also said he had no relationship with Slot when he spoke to reporters after the match at Elland Road.

On Tuesday, Liverpool won 1-0 at Inter Milan, while the 33-year-old Salah posted a picture on social media of himself alone in a gym at the club’s training ground.

“I will have a conversation with Mo this morning — the outcome of that conversation determines how things will look tomorrow,” Slot told his pre-match press conference.

“I think the next time I speak about Mo should be with him and not in here. You can keep on trying but there is not much more to say about it.

“After the Sunderland game (a 1-1 draw on December 3 in which Salah came on as a second-half substitute) there were a lot of conversations between his representatives and ours, between him and me,” he said.

Slot batted away further questions from reporters about the forward, but said, “I have no reasons not wanting him to stay, and that is a little bit of an answer to your question.”

Salah, who signed a new two-year contract at Liverpool in April, which made him one of the highest-paid players in the Premier League, is due to join the Egypt squad for the Africa Cup of Nations after Saturday’s Brighton game at Anfield.

The length of his absence depends on how far Egypt goes in the competition in Morocco, with the final taking place on January 18.

Salah, third in Liverpool’s all-time scoring charts with 250 goals in 420 appearances, has won two Premier League titles and one Champions League triumph during his spell on Merseyside.

He scored 29 Premier League goals last season as Liverpool romped to a 20th English league title, but has managed just four league goals in 13 appearances this season.

Liverpool are 10th in the table after a shocking run, with two wins in their past 10 Premier League games.

Salah has been linked with a move to the lucrative Saudi Pro League.

UN General Assembly adopts resolution demanding Israel allow aid into Gaza

The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly backed a resolution demanding that Israel open unrestricted humanitarian access to the Gaza Strip, stop attacking UN facilities, and comply with international law in line with its obligations as an occupying power.

The vote on Friday followed October’s advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which outlined Israel’s responsibilities under both the UN Charter and humanitarian law.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Israel has only allowed into Gaza a fraction of the humanitarian aid deliveries agreed to as part of the United States-brokered ceasefire that came into effect in October.

The UN resolution, tabled by Norway alongside more than a dozen other states, secured support from 139 countries.

Only 12 voted against, including Israel and the US, while 19 abstained.

Introducing the draft, Norway’s Permanent Representative Merete Fjeld Brattested warned that “2024 was among the most violent years in three decades, 2025 has followed suit,” adding that the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory remained “a particular point in mind”.

“Civilians are paying the highest price. Respect for humanitarian principles is eroding. The most fundamental tenets of humanitarian law are under pressure,” she said, emphasising that the ICJ’s advisory proceedings were crucial for clarifying state obligations.

Brattested noted that member states had sought legal clarity “on fundamental issues pertaining to the provision of life-saving humanitarian assistance to the civilian population in Palestine”.

She pointed to recent attacks that underscored the urgency of the Court’s findings, including UN chief Antonio Guterres’s condemnation of Israel’s “unauthorised entry” into UNRWA’s Sheikh Jarrah compound. “As stated by the secretary-general, this is in clear violation of Israel’s obligations to respect the inviolability of United Nations premises,” she said.

US rejects vote

Speaking before the vote, US envoy Jeff Bartos rejected the resolution, claiming it “exemplifies how even following President [Donald] Trump’s landmark peace agreement and the historic passage of Security Council resolution 2803, the General Assembly continues its decades-long pattern of unfairly targeting Israel.”

Philippe Lazzarini, the commissioner-general of the UN Agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, meanwhile, welcomed the outcome, saying it offered “a strong endorsement” of the ICJ’s finding that allegations of Hamas infiltration inside the agency “are not substantiated”, nor are claims that UNRWA lacks neutrality.

“This vote is an important sign of support for UNRWA from the overwhelming majority of the international community,” he said.

Palestinian National Council Speaker Rouhi Fattouh also praised the adoption, saying the wide margin reflected “a firm international position supporting UNRWA and renewing recognition of its legal mandate and its key role in protecting Palestinian refugees”.

Tunisia sentences opposition leader Abir Moussi to 12 years in jail

A Tunisian court has sentenced prominent opposition leader Abir Moussi to 12 years in prison amid a sweeping crackdown on critics of President Kais Saied, who has said he is cleansing the North African country of “traitors”.

Lawyer Nafaa Laribi, who represented Moussi, the leader of the Free Destourian Party (Free Constitutional Party), in her third trial in the space of two years, called Friday’s ruling “unjust”, saying that it was “not a judicial decision but a politically motivated order”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In a statement released before the verdict, the Free Destourian Party condemned “the injustice suffered by the party’s president, Abir Moussi, who has been arbitrarily detained since October 3, 2023”.

Moussi has been at the helm of the Free Destourian Party since 2016 and was a supporter of the late President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who was toppled by mass protests in 2011.

Her party has organised protests against President Saied, who came to power in 2019, shutting down the elected parliament in 2021 and moving to rule by decree.

He claimed that his measures were an attempt to save the country from anarchy.

The opposition leader was imprisoned in 2023 after police arrested her at the presidential palace entrance on suspicion of assault intended to cause chaos, amid a broader crackdown on journalists, activists, civil society groups and opposition leaders.

Moussi rejected the charges, saying she was simply exercising her right to criticise and legal opposition and promising to continue resisting what she called “abuse, torture, and political and moral violence”.

Friday’s sentence was in connection with that incident.

Previously, the politician had been sentenced to two years in prison under Decree 54, a law Saied enacted in 2022 to combat “false news”, though the punishment was later reduced on appeal.

After completing her first jail term last June, Moussi was sentenced again under the same law to two years in prison. The appeal process in that case is still under way.

Moussi’s detractors claim she wants to return to the authoritarianism of Ben Ali, who was toppled after citizens rose up against his rule in a revolution that inspired the Arab Spring and led to a democratic transition at home.

However, Saied’s current government also stands accused of escalating a crackdown, with dozens of opposition figures recently sentenced to harsh prison terms in a mass trial on charges of conspiracy against state security. Others are being prosecuted under Decree 54, which critics say is being deployed to criminalise free speech.

Rights groups and opponents say Saied has destroyed the independence of the judiciary since he shut down the elected parliament in 2021.

In 2022, he dissolved the Supreme Judicial Council and sacked dozens of judges, moves that opposition groups and rights advocates condemned as a coup.

Five million World Cup ticket requests in one day – Fifa

Getty Images

Five million requests for 2026 World Cup tickets have been made since the latest ticketing phase opened on Thursday, says Fifa – despite growing criticism over their cost.

Football’s world governing body says fans from more than 200 countries have asked for tickets, with the group match between Colombia and Portugal in Miami on 27 June the most sought after.

But the pricing structure for next year’s tournament in the United States, Canada and Mexico has been criticised, with the Football Supporters’ Association (FSA) calling it “scandalous”.

Group-stage tickets are up to three times the prices of those for Qatar in 2022, while the cheapest ticket for the final will cost £3,119.

The FSA has joined Football Supporters Europe (FSE) in demanding the sales process is stopped so fans’ groups can hold talks with Fifa over its pricing policy.

“We back Football Supporters Europe in calling for a halt in ticket sales and we are calling on the Football Association to work with fellow FAs to directly challenge these disgraceful prices,” the FSA said in a statement.

“We call on all national associations to stand up for your supporters, without whom there would be no professional game.”

Fifa has yet to comment on the criticism, while both the FA and the Scottish FA have yet to comment on the ticket prices.

BBC Sport has been told the FA is aware that England fans are angry, and is planning to pass on those concerns to Fifa.

There is a Fifa Council meeting in Doha next week, and FA chair Debbie Hewitt will be present. Last month she said she was opposed to dynamic ticket pricing, and has vowed it will not be used at Euro 2028, which the UK and Ireland is hosting.

With the Home Nations FAs hoping to host the 2035 Women’s World Cup, they – and the UK government – may be wary of upsetting Fifa.

Privately, Fifa insiders say while tickets will seem expensive to many, the governing body has a duty to set prices with the US market in mind, grow the game around the world, and to use its revenues to develop men’s, women’s and youth football.

Fifa president Gianni Infantino has also promised to achieve record revenues, and the most lucrative sports event in history will do no harm to his re-election hopes in 2027.

The huge increase in the price of tickets was revealed on Thursday when Fifa released allocation details for the official supporters’ groups of each country.

At the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, group stage fixtures all had set prices of £68.50, £164.50 or £219.

But for England v Croatia and Scotland v Brazil next year, tickets cost around £198, £373 or £523.

The cost ramps up considerably in the latter stages.

Quarter-finals for all teams are £507, £757 and £1,073, with the semi-finals £686, £1,819 and £2,363.

The cheapest tickets for the final are £3,119, seven times more expensive than in Qatar.

There are no concessions across any of its tickets for children or other groups.

Next year’s World Cup, the first time 48 nations will be taking part, takes place from Thursday, 11 June to Sunday, 19 July, with the draw made last Friday.

While Colombia v Portugal has been the most popular match so far, Fifa says that is followed by Brazil v Morocco (New Jersey, 13 June), Mexico v South Korea (Guadalajara, 18 June), Ecuador v Germany (New Jersey, 25 June), and Scotland v Brazil (Miami, 24 June).

Ticket prices a ‘laughable insult’ to supporters

The cheapest tickets are in the ‘supporter value’ category, which the FSA called “a laughable insult to your average fan”.

The FSA added that supporters felt they had been “stabbed in the back” and that loyal fans will now likely be missing in the US, Mexico and Canada because the matches will be “unaffordable” to most.

“This is a tournament that is supposed to be celebrated by the world, where fans of all nations come together for the love of football,” the FSA said. “Fifa has decided to make it all about the money and the elite who can afford it.

“For Fifa, loyalty is not the hard-working fan travelling thousands of miles in support of their team at qualifiers around the continent. A game that should be for all is now only for those who can afford it.

“Who needs to follow England away for disappointment when Fifa can deliver that six months before a ball is kicked? The life has been sucked out of this tournament before it starts.”

It will cost about £5,225 for a supporter to follow their team through to the final if they were to attend all eight matches in the cheapest ticket category.

That rises to about £8,850 in the mid-price range, or £12,357 for the top tier.

FSE demands talks over ‘extortionate’ ticket prices

Donald Trump and Gianni InfantinoGetty Images

FSE has called on Fifa to stop the ticket sale process, believing it needs to rethink the pricing policy.

“In the price tables gradually and confidentially released by Fifa, tickets allocated to national associations… are reaching astronomical levels,” it said in a statement.

“Adding insult to injury, the lowest price category will not be available to the most dedicated supporters through their national associations [because] Fifa chose to reserve the scarce number of category four tickets to the general sales, subject to dynamic ticket pricing.

“For the first time in World Cup history, no consistent price will be offered across all group-stage games. Instead, Fifa is introducing a variable pricing policy dependent on vague criteria such as the perceived attractiveness of the fixture.

“Fans of different national teams will therefore have to pay different prices for the same category at the same stage of the tournament, without any transparency on the pricing structure enforced by Fifa.”

The Football Supporters’ Association’s England Fans’ Embassy said: “These prices are a slap in the face to supporters who support their team outside of the flagship tournament that appears every four years.

Related topics

  • Football
  • England Men’s Football Team

Five million World Cup ticket requests in one day – Fifa

Getty Images

Five million requests for 2026 World Cup tickets have been made since the latest ticketing phase opened on Thursday, says Fifa – despite growing criticism over their cost.

Football’s world governing body says fans from more than 200 countries have asked for tickets, with the group match between Colombia and Portugal in Miami on 27 June the most sought after.

But the pricing structure for next year’s tournament in the United States, Canada and Mexico has been criticised, with the Football Supporters’ Association (FSA) calling it “scandalous”.

Group-stage tickets are up to three times the prices of those for Qatar in 2022, while the cheapest ticket for the final will cost £3,119.

The FSA has joined Football Supporters Europe (FSE) in demanding the sales process is stopped so fans’ groups can hold talks with Fifa over its pricing policy.

“We back Football Supporters Europe in calling for a halt in ticket sales and we are calling on the Football Association to work with fellow FAs to directly challenge these disgraceful prices,” the FSA said in a statement.

“We call on all national associations to stand up for your supporters, without whom there would be no professional game.”

Fifa has yet to comment on the criticism, while both the FA and the Scottish FA have yet to comment on the ticket prices.

BBC Sport has been told the FA is aware that England fans are angry, and is planning to pass on those concerns to Fifa.

There is a Fifa Council meeting in Doha next week, and FA chair Debbie Hewitt will be present. Last month she said she was opposed to dynamic ticket pricing, and has vowed it will not be used at Euro 2028, which the UK and Ireland is hosting.

With the Home Nations FAs hoping to host the 2035 Women’s World Cup, they – and the UK government – may be wary of upsetting Fifa.

Privately, Fifa insiders say while tickets will seem expensive to many, the governing body has a duty to set prices with the US market in mind, grow the game around the world, and to use its revenues to develop men’s, women’s and youth football.

Fifa president Gianni Infantino has also promised to achieve record revenues, and the most lucrative sports event in history will do no harm to his re-election hopes in 2027.

The huge increase in the price of tickets was revealed on Thursday when Fifa released allocation details for the official supporters’ groups of each country.

At the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, group stage fixtures all had set prices of £68.50, £164.50 or £219.

But for England v Croatia and Scotland v Brazil next year, tickets cost around £198, £373 or £523.

The cost ramps up considerably in the latter stages.

Quarter-finals for all teams are £507, £757 and £1,073, with the semi-finals £686, £1,819 and £2,363.

The cheapest tickets for the final are £3,119, seven times more expensive than in Qatar.

There are no concessions across any of its tickets for children or other groups.

Next year’s World Cup, the first time 48 nations will be taking part, takes place from Thursday, 11 June to Sunday, 19 July, with the draw made last Friday.

While Colombia v Portugal has been the most popular match so far, Fifa says that is followed by Brazil v Morocco (New Jersey, 13 June), Mexico v South Korea (Guadalajara, 18 June), Ecuador v Germany (New Jersey, 25 June), and Scotland v Brazil (Miami, 24 June).

Ticket prices a ‘laughable insult’ to supporters

The cheapest tickets are in the ‘supporter value’ category, which the FSA called “a laughable insult to your average fan”.

The FSA added that supporters felt they had been “stabbed in the back” and that loyal fans will now likely be missing in the US, Mexico and Canada because the matches will be “unaffordable” to most.

“This is a tournament that is supposed to be celebrated by the world, where fans of all nations come together for the love of football,” the FSA said. “Fifa has decided to make it all about the money and the elite who can afford it.

“For Fifa, loyalty is not the hard-working fan travelling thousands of miles in support of their team at qualifiers around the continent. A game that should be for all is now only for those who can afford it.

“Who needs to follow England away for disappointment when Fifa can deliver that six months before a ball is kicked? The life has been sucked out of this tournament before it starts.”

It will cost about £5,225 for a supporter to follow their team through to the final if they were to attend all eight matches in the cheapest ticket category.

That rises to about £8,850 in the mid-price range, or £12,357 for the top tier.

FSE demands talks over ‘extortionate’ ticket prices

Donald Trump and Gianni InfantinoGetty Images

FSE has called on Fifa to stop the ticket sale process, believing it needs to rethink the pricing policy.

“In the price tables gradually and confidentially released by Fifa, tickets allocated to national associations… are reaching astronomical levels,” it said in a statement.

“Adding insult to injury, the lowest price category will not be available to the most dedicated supporters through their national associations [because] Fifa chose to reserve the scarce number of category four tickets to the general sales, subject to dynamic ticket pricing.

“For the first time in World Cup history, no consistent price will be offered across all group-stage games. Instead, Fifa is introducing a variable pricing policy dependent on vague criteria such as the perceived attractiveness of the fixture.

“Fans of different national teams will therefore have to pay different prices for the same category at the same stage of the tournament, without any transparency on the pricing structure enforced by Fifa.”

The Football Supporters’ Association’s England Fans’ Embassy said: “These prices are a slap in the face to supporters who support their team outside of the flagship tournament that appears every four years.

Related topics

  • Football
  • England Men’s Football Team