Taylor Swift’s impressive 20-year career and the fiery fueds that have come after her, according to a new Channel 4 documentary.
Since stepping into public consciousness over the course of more than 20 years, Taylor Swift has been the subject of a number of public disputes.
In Channel 4’s newest documentary, Taylor: The Star Who Changed the World, the singer’s rise to fame and public outcry will be explored.
The two-part series, which will air on Tuesday (September 30) at 9:15 pm, includes interviews with Taylor’s former employees and devoted fans.
Taylor will examine the musician’s 20-year career, which saw her transcend the status of a pop star and establish herself as a unique cultural icon.
The documentary examines the forces behind her trajectory and the dedicated community she has inspired through interviews with well-known commentators, industry insiders, and fans.
Here are Taylor’s infamous disputes explained as Swifties prepare to tune into the docuseries.
Kanye West and Kanye West feud
Kanye West stunned Taylor when he interrupted her 2009 MTV Video Music Awards acceptance speech.
Taylor, age 19, was just 19 at the time when her song You Belong With Me won the Best Female Video award.
Kanye attacked her as she accepted the prize, making it seem as though Beyoncé’s single ladies music video deserved it.
Beyoncé had one of the best videos ever, but the rapper famously said, “Yo, Taylor, I’m really happy for you and I’m really happy for you and I’m gonna let you finish.”
Kanye did call me and he was very sincere in his apology, Taylor later said, “I accepted that apology.”
However, in 2016 a public dispute between the two occurred. For his album The Life Of Pablo, Kanye released a song called Famous, as depicted in the new docuseries.
I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex, lyrics in the song, and why? I made that b**** famous. “
The popstar later admitted she did not hear the song before it was released and that he did not know he would refer to her as “that b****” while the rapper called Taylor to warn her about the namedrop.
A phone call recorded by Kanye’s then-wife Kim Kardashian confirmed that Taylor did not approve the biting lyrics as Kanye had claimed.
Although the duo has engaged in numerous public altercations, there haven’t been any frenzy altercations in recent years.
$1 legal action
After a DJ David Mueller was found groping Taylor during a meet-and-greet photo opportunity, Taylor was awarded $1 (77p) by the jury in 2017.
The DJ claimed that the 35-year-old’s allegations cost him his $150, 000-per-year job at KYGO radio in Colorado after filing his own lawsuit against the popstar.
In contrast, she filed a counterclaims, asking for just $1 in the event that he is found guilty. During a court hearing in June 2013, the singer claimed the DJ allegedly placed his hand on her “bare ass cheek” while he was subdued.
The actor allegedly groped the actress’ bottom during a meet-and-greet session following her 2013 concert in Denver.
No means no, her representative told the court, and the trial was meant to convey the message.
Braun and Scooter battle
Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.
After Scott Borchetta’s company purchased the label where Taylor signed her first record deal, Taylor was the subject of another public dispute in 2019. Taylor lost that title to Scooter Braun.
Taylor had no control over her musical legacy as a result. The popstar then re-recorded her first six albums to ensure that she had complete control over the music her fans had grown to adore.
Continue reading the article.
The international superstar waited years before regaining control over her music. She stated in a statement to fans in May, “Everything I’ve ever made… now belongs to me.”
Taylor Swift’s impressive 20-year career and the fiery fueds that have come after her, according to a new Channel 4 documentary.
Since stepping into public consciousness over the course of more than 20 years, Taylor Swift has been the subject of a number of public disputes.
In Channel 4’s newest documentary, Taylor: The Star Who Changed the World, the singer’s rise to fame and public outcry will be explored.
The two-part series, which will air on Tuesday (September 30) at 9:15 pm, includes interviews with Taylor’s former employees and devoted fans.
Taylor will examine the musician’s 20-year career, which saw her transcend the status of a pop star and establish herself as a unique cultural icon.
The documentary examines the forces behind her trajectory and the dedicated community she has inspired through interviews with well-known commentators, industry insiders, and fans.
Here are Taylor’s infamous disputes explained as Swifties prepare to tune into the docuseries.
Kanye West and Kanye West feud
Kanye West stunned Taylor when he interrupted her 2009 MTV Video Music Awards acceptance speech.
Taylor, age 19, was just 19 at the time when her song You Belong With Me won the Best Female Video award.
Kanye attacked her as she accepted the prize, making it seem as though Beyoncé’s single ladies music video deserved it.
Beyoncé had one of the best videos ever, but the rapper famously said, “Yo, Taylor, I’m really happy for you and I’m really happy for you and I’m gonna let you finish.”
Kanye did call me and he was very sincere in his apology, Taylor later said, “I accepted that apology.”
However, in 2016 a public dispute between the two occurred. For his album The Life Of Pablo, Kanye released a song called Famous, as depicted in the new docuseries.
I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex, lyrics in the song, and why? I made that b**** famous. “
The popstar later admitted she did not hear the song before it was released and that he did not know he would refer to her as “that b****” while the rapper called Taylor to warn her about the namedrop.
A phone call recorded by Kanye’s then-wife Kim Kardashian confirmed that Taylor did not approve the biting lyrics as Kanye had claimed.
Although the duo has engaged in numerous public altercations, there haven’t been any frenzy altercations in recent years.
$1 legal action
After a DJ David Mueller was found groping Taylor during a meet-and-greet photo opportunity, Taylor was awarded $1 (77p) by the jury in 2017.
The DJ claimed that the 35-year-old’s allegations cost him his $150, 000-per-year job at KYGO radio in Colorado after filing his own lawsuit against the popstar.
In contrast, she filed a counterclaims, asking for just $1 in the event that he is found guilty. During a court hearing in June 2013, the singer claimed the DJ allegedly placed his hand on her “bare ass cheek” while he was subdued.
The actor allegedly groped the actress’ bottom during a meet-and-greet session following her 2013 concert in Denver.
No means no, her representative told the court, and the trial was meant to convey the message.
Braun and Scooter battle
Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.
After Scott Borchetta’s company purchased the label where Taylor signed her first record deal, Taylor was the subject of another public dispute in 2019. Taylor lost that title to Scooter Braun.
Taylor had no control over her musical legacy as a result. The popstar then re-recorded her first six albums to ensure that she had complete control over the music her fans had grown to adore.
Continue reading the article.
The international superstar waited years before regaining control over her music. She stated in a statement to fans in May, “Everything I’ve ever made… now belongs to me.”
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, a midfielder for Everton, described the suspension as “mind-boggling” and said it was “mind boggling” that he had already received five yellow cards in six Premier League games.
Dewsbury-Hall will miss Sunday’s game against Crystal Palace because she was booked for a challenge on Kyle Walker-Peters against West Ham on Monday.
“Forgive me if I’m wrong, and I might be, but some of these choices are so challenging to make. The 27-year-old posted on X in a mind-boggling manner.
At this stage of the campaign, players are frequently suspended for accumulating yellow cards, as happened to Chelsea striker Nicolas Jackson two years ago.
Referee Samuel Barrott’s decision to show a card was “shabby,” according to Everton manager David Moyes, who questioned the standard of officiating in the Premier League.
Moyes remarked, “I think the decisions we’ve had at the moment have been frustrating, but I think all the managers are currently saying that,” adding that.
Since joining Everton from Chelsea in an estimated £28 million deal in August, Dewsbury-Hall has started all six of their league games.
His fourth yellow was a quick free kick that his team, Liverpool, received on September 20th, lost to Merseyside rivals 2-1.
In late August, government officials from Zambia and Israel assembled to celebrate the reopening of the Israeli embassy in Lusaka. It was the first time in 52 years that an Israeli flag would be raised in the Zambian capital, following a long period of severed ties.
“Israel is returning to Zambia. Israel is returning to Africa,” Gideon Saar, the Israeli foreign affairs minister, who had flown into the country for the event and led the ribbon-cutting, declared in a post on X. Undoubtedly, for Saar, this was a true feat, coming at a time when much of the world is isolating Israel due to its devastating onslaught on the Gaza Strip. Israeli media hailed the move as a triumph. One called the small Southern African country Israel’s “next great Africa frontier”.
Recommended Stories
list of 4 itemsend of list
“Many countries in Africa are lining up for Israel to open an embassy in their capitals, these days,” Saar boasted in a speech at the ceremony. “We choose to begin in Zambia.”
The reopening event appears to be part of a series of calculated moves by Israel to pull African nations to its side at a time when its global standing is damaged, experts say.
Israel’s war on Gaza, labelled in mid-September as a genocide by a United Nations panel of inquiry, has seen Israel kill at least 66,055 Palestinians and level almost every part of the Strip. Some say strengthening ties with Zambia appears to be Israel’s crack at weakening its regional neighbour, South Africa, which is Israel’s fiercest critic in Africa.
“It’s a play of the decades-old divide and rule strategy to erode regional support among states and actors aligned with South Africa,” researcher Faith Mabera of the University of the Witwatersrand told Al Jazeera, adding that the move could undermine Pretoria’s influence within the Southern African Development Community (SADC).
A week before the Zambia event, Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Sharren Haskel, visited Nigeria, where she met with her counterpart. However, Abuja, which has proclaimed support for Palestinians, did not publicise the meeting on social media channels. Two weeks later, Nigeria’s anti-terrorism unit detained Ramzy Abu Ibrahim, a leader of the Palestinian community in Nigeria. It’s unclear what Ibrahim’s offence is, or if the Israeli minister’s visit is connected to his arrest. Nigeria’s foreign ministry spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.
Haskel went on to South Sudan, a staunch Israel ally, promising aid to the fragile, young country currently caught in armed conflict between President Salva Kiir and sides loyal to First Vice President Riek Machar. Haskel, in a statement, deployed whataboutism, questioning why all eyes were on Gaza when countries like South Sudan also face humanitarian emergencies.
What the diplomat did not mention was that her visit came right as reports leaked of talks between Israeli and South Sudanese officials over controversial plans to forcibly transfer Palestinians from Gaza to the East African country. South Sudan has denied the talks, despite reporting from credible sources like Reuters and The Associated Press news agencies. The forcible transfer of Palestinians under Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Gaza could constitute a war crime.
There are similar talks of autonomous Somaliland hosting expelled Palestinians from Gaza in exchange for official recognition from the United States and Israel. Somalilanders say they want no part in it.
South Sudanese migrants celebrate their country’s independence in the Kasarani outskirts of the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, in July 2011 [Dai Kurokawa/EPA]
Highs and lows of Africa-Israel ties
Israel’s image in Africa, on average, is poor, experts note, although it’s not for a lack of trying on the Israeli government’s part. A handful of countries respond to its friendly overtures, but the overall majority have firmly kept their distance.
One reason is that Israel does not carry the weight of countries like China and Russia, which are looking to more deeply engage African leaders for their mineral resources and for their votes at the United Nations General Assembly. Israel, in particular, needs support from the global community: between 2015 and 2023, the UNGA passed 154 resolutions against the country, compared with 71 against all other countries combined.
The bigger reason for African countries’ distancing, though, researchers note, is Palestine.
South Africa vocally leads the pack of critics because of its own painful history of apartheid – which Israel was a strong supporter of – and Israel’s continuation of its own apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territories. Nelson Mandela’s infamous 1997 quote about how South Africa’s freedom is incomplete without Palestine’s is a blueprint for Pretoria’s keen protectiveness.
Relations with the continent were not always unfriendly. Israel ingratiated itself with most African nations in the 1950s and 1960s, after they gained independence from colonial powers in waves. At the time, Israeli leaders like David Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir were intent on pushing a narrative of Israel as an ally of “freed people”, historians note, partly to build influence at the UN.
Things turned ugly amid the October 1973 war, when those nations began to see Israel as a pariah encroaching not just on Palestine, but on Egypt, and in effect, on Africa. Uganda was the first to turn from Israel. Within the space of months, more than 20 African nations had abruptly cut ties. The collective effect of that cold disapproval dealt a grave diplomatic blow to Israel. It was unprecedented, and no region has ever again jointly moved so strongly against Israel.
Israel has since pushed for a return to the friendly days with some success. It reopened about 11 embassies across Africa, down from an initial 33 embassies and consulates before 1973. A few of the countries Israel is wooing, such as Nigeria, are members of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which brings together 57 countries globally with significant Muslim populations, and has repeatedly called for ceasefires in Gaza.
Sudan and Morocco, also part of the OIC, agreed to normalise relations with Israel, following the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, under the US-brokered 2020 Abraham Accords.
In 2021, Israel attained observer status at the African Union (AU), after two failed attempts. South Africa and Algeria contest the move and say Moussa Faki, the then-chief of the AU Commission, the continental body’s executive branch, took the decision unilaterally. Palestine, on the other hand, became an observer in 2013, allowing it to participate in AU summits for longer.
From aid to arms
Israel has particularly set eyes on East Africa, especially Ethiopia, home to 160,000 Ethiopian Jews, some of whom Israel secretly airlifted in 1991 amid the Ethiopian civil war. In 2016, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu toured East Africa, visiting Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda and Ethiopia. The Israeli aid agency, Mashav, sent aid worth $45.5m to Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, South Sudan and Kenya between 2009 and 2021, according to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Aid often went towards agriculture, water and healthcare.
Israeli aid to African countries does not represent a major source of financing. Ethiopia, which receives most Israeli funding, received $1.3bn in US aid in 2024, for example. The World Bank, Germany and the European Union have become its biggest funders since the US cut back on foreign assistance.
Results, at least for UN resolutions, have been mixed, researchers note, with some East African nations accepting funds while not committing to consistent support of Israel, because of the general pro-Palestine policy of the AU.
Ethiopia, for one, according to a 2024 study by Ben-Gurion University researcher Yaron Salman, voted several times against Israel at the UN between 2012 and 2021, despite receiving more than half of its aid assistance to Africa around the same time.
Only South Sudan, the study noted, consistently stood by Israel. Both countries formed relations early in South Sudan’s history, as Israel backed independence fighters against Sudan, which South Sudan broke away from in 2011. This backing goes back decades with Israel’s Mossad agency first providing military support to rebel fighters in the 1960s. Haim Koren, a former Israeli ambassador to South Sudan, wrote in a 2019 analysis piece for the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies that Israel supported the secession forces to target Sudan – and generally, the Arab region. Reports as far back as 1994 noted Israeli arms being transferred to South Sudanese rebels, and in 2016, a UN panel of experts concluded that Israeli weapons were fuelling the civil war that broke out immediately after South Sudan’s independence.
South Sudan’s foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment. In a statement in August, the ministry said claims of a forcible transfer of Palestinians to the country are “baseless and do not reflect the official position or policy” of South Sudan.
South Sudanese democracy activist Mahmoud Akot told Al Jazeera that history aside, any attempts to transfer Palestinians to the country would be met with fierce opposition because of the country’s own challenges.
“It’s hard for the government to acknowledge this publicly, let alone try to convince people to accept it,” Akot said. “I think the deal will not be fruitful.”
Other African nations – even South Africa – have not been immune to Israel’s arms appeal, despite support for Palestine. Cameroon, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Lesotho, Nigeria, Rwanda, the Seychelles, South Africa and Uganda all bought weapons from Israel between 2006 and 2010, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Many continue to trade with Israel, buying everything from surveillance technologies and agro-tech equipment to consumer goods.
“By embedding itself in African security structures, Israel not only profits from instability but also gains partners less likely to challenge its brutal military occupation and its genocidal atrocities,” South African analyst Reneva Fourie told Al Jazeera. “These partnerships normalise Israel as a counterterrorism ally while deflecting attention from the fact that it is the perpetrator of state terror against Palestinians.”
Director-General of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation of South Africa Zane Dangor and South African Ambassador to the Netherlands Vusimuzi Madonsela at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), at the start of South Africa’s case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza, in May 2024 [Yves Herman/Reuters]
Is Israel winning the diplomacy game?
After it began its war on Gaza in October 2023, whatever fragile support Israel had on the continent appeared to largely collapse.
In a landmark case, South Africa accused Israel of genocide in Gaza at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in December 2023, and the AU, early on in the war, was unequivocal in its condemnation of Israel and its support for Palestinian statehood.
A few embarrassing scenarios illustrate Israel’s further fall from grace. In April this year, the Israeli ambassador to Ethiopia, Avraham Nigusse, was thrown out of an AU event commemorating the 30th anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, which was being held at the AU headquarters in Addis Ababa. Nigusse, of Ethiopian descent, fumed on social media, calling the move “outrageous”. The order reportedly came from the AU Commission chief, the no-nonsense Mahamoud Ali Youssouf of Djibouti. As foreign minister, Youssouf’s criticism of Western nations’ inability to stop Israel’s war on Gaza was blistering.
One unnamed diplomat, speaking to AP after the incident in Addis Ababa, said Nigusse was removed because Israel has now lost the observer status it struggled to get.
Sharon Bar-li, deputy director of Israel’s foreign ministry’s Africa department, triggered the AU to first suspend Israel in February 2023, when she attended a high-level meeting of African leaders that only the Israeli ambassador to the AU had been invited to, according to the bloc’s statement. Bar-li was unceremoniously expelled from the meeting, as seen in now viral clips. Then-AU Commission chief Faki confirmed a day after the incident that the bloc had already suspended Israel’s status, which South Africa and Algeria long advocated for. The bloc did not clarify when the suspension occurred, and has not publicly released more information on the issue.
Even as most of Africa stands resolute with Palestine, researcher Fourie noted that Israel is winning somewhat, at least with new friends like Zambia, and those Arab countries like Morocco which have normalised ties with the country. Zambia and South Sudan were part of six African countries that abstained at the first UN resolution vote condemning Israel’s assault in November 2023, a month after the war on Gaza began. Cameroon, Ethiopia, Malawi and Equatorial Guinea did the same. Other African countries voted in support.
Lusaka defaulted on foreign debt in 2020 and is desperate for investment. Israel is thus exploiting this context to insert itself deeper into the Southern Africa region, Fourie said. It’s unclear yet if Israel has delivered major aid funds to Zambia, but Lusaka received a heart-lung monitoring machine in August from Israeli humanitarian organisation Save a Child’s Heart. Zambian agriculture students also travel on sponsored training programmes to the Naqab Desert (Negev in Hebrew) region. Zambia’s foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
Israel’s government press office and foreign affairs office did not respond to requests for comments for this story.
For Fourie, South Africa has a leading role in countering Israel’s influence on the continent. For that, she said, African countries need to deepen economic ties and protect themselves from foreign influence in the guise of aid. Fourie said these countries also must remind themselves that backing Palestine is the moral response to the decades of imperialism Africa suffered.
Still, Muhammad Desai, co-founder of the Johannesburg-based solidarity group, Africa4Palestine, insists that Israel’s “desperate” strategy is already being diluted by ordinary citizens.
“Solidarity movements across the continent in support of the Palestinian people have grown exponentially,” in recent months, Desai said.
Keith Urban’s friends reportedly believe that his breakup with Nicole Kidman was “unavoidable.”
3 images to be seen
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban’s former partners are “not surprised” by their split after 20 years.
Keith Urban’s friends reportedly thought his split from wife of 19 years, Nicole Kidman, was ‘inevitable’. The Hollywood couple, who share two teenage daughters, shocked fans when they reportedly parted ways this summer, with an insider claiming they had been “living apart” for several months.
On the day of their wedding, Babygirl actress Nicole posted a brief but sweet tribute to her husband on her social media page, which he only emailed back with a red heart emoji. The country singer is known to blog about his wife’s special day, but he didn’t on their special day this year.
Meanwhile, his close friends reportedly weren’t surprised their union ended.
READ MORE: Gutting sign Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman’s marriage was over months agoREAD MORE: Keith Urban’s livid response to Nicole Kidman’s racy roles before split
Speaking to People, a source said it “really hasn’t been a secret” the couple had been “living separately for a while now.”
The source continued, “People close to Keith believed the split was sort of inevitable.” For comment, The Mirror reached out to their representatives.
The couple, who have daughters Faith Margaret, 14, and Sunday Rose, 17, are reportedly separating due to their demanding careers and growing intimacy.
Nicole is never seen by Keith, according to a source close to the investigation. Neither she nor Keith are on tour. The two people may not have gotten married, but there was much love between them. They have known each other for decades, so there is a world where they can reconcile, but their relationship is still a couple in the present.
According to insiders, Urban initiated the separation, citing unhappiness in the marriage. “The intimacy isn’t there, they are just going through the motions [of being married].
The source continued to the Daily Mail, “If this separation brings them back together, that would be amazing, but Keith had to tell them that he wasn’t happy,” the source continued.
Nicole’s sudden decision was reportedly “blinded,” according to reports. However, some claim that the couple may try to reconcile over the upcoming birthday and the holiday season.
The singer moved into a different city residence after leaving the couple’s $4 million Nashville compound, according to TMZ.
According to sources, Nicole’s mother’s passing in September caused the couple to drift apart more frequently. Although they make an effort to speak every day when they are apart, a woman’s day insider told Woman’s Day that their time apart is “shocking.”
Follow Mirror Celebs on Threads, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Instagram, and TikTok.
Continue reading the article.
READ MORE: MacBook Air with M4 chip gets huge £100 price drop, but it’s not from Apple READ MORE: ‘Perfect match’ foundation that leaves skin ‘flawless’ uses ‘world first’ technology
Mohammed Idris, the minister of information and national orientation, has expressed condolences to the Maduagwu family after Somtochukwu Maduagwu, an Arise News anchor, passed away.
The minister described her passing as a terrible loss for both the Nigerian media and the country, as well as her family and the Arise News team.
Read more about how Kogi Police Recover The Body of A Murdered Photojournalist.
In a letter of condolence he signed and addressed to the Chairman of the Arise News channel, Nduka Obaigbena, he stated, “We express our deep condolences to you and the entire ARISE News family on the shocking and untimely death of your beloved anchor, Ms. Somtochukwu Christelle Maduagwu,” he wrote in a letter of condolence.
The minister expressed his sadness over the “heinous incident that cut down a promising young journalist in her prime.”
He continued, “Ms. Somtochukwu’s tragic death is a grievous loss to the Nigerian media fraternity, and indeed the nation,” adding: “Not only to the ARISE News family, but also to the media fraternity.”
The minister promised a “swift investigation” to find the causes of the late news anchor’s death.