Kate Price stunned passers-by in Dubai as she donned a neon bikini during a beach vacation, just days after fans warned her to be cautious about offending locals with her outfit choices.
Katie Price spills out of bold bikini on Dubai beach after fans issue indecency ‘arrest’ warning(Image: BACKGRID)
Katie Price once again turned heads as she strutted through the surf in a barely-there neon bikini, while she enjoyed a beach break in Dubai. The former glamour model and reality star showed off her assets as she soaked up the sun, fresh from partying in Ibiza with Wayne Lineker.
Katie, a mother-of-five, donned the vibrant orange two-piece, flaunting a number of tattoos and a deep bronzed tan, and showed off her surgically-enhanced body. After going through numerous procedures, she slicked her black hair back as she maneuvered through the shallow waters.
Her stunning appearance comes just weeks after her 17th breast augmentation, which sparked new debate about her decision to keep her appearance a secret. The Pricey continues to make defiant decisions despite receiving criticism for her surgeries and extreme weight loss.
Katie’s recent outfit from her Dubai trip, a see-through mesh dress that showed off all her curves, caused fans to voice their concerns that she’d be arrested. One user commented on her Facebook upload: “I didn’t realize in Dubai you could walk around like that I always thought Dubai had a strict clothes policy. I must have got that wrong !”
Katie Price was warned she could be ‘arrested’ for her bold looks(Image: BACKGRID)
Another phrase, “You’d be arrested for wearing that in Dubai,” was utterly offensive. The outfit is completely disrespectful, a third person said. A fourth person said, “She is a little underdressed, respect the country you’re in,” and another said, “.
Continue reading the article.
Although there are no dress codes, people still adhere to the UAE’s culture. Any tourist who is found to be wearing inappropriate clothing is asked to agree not to do it again; if they do, they could face legal action.
Katie Price was photographed on the beach in Dubai(Image: BACKGRID)
Katie has regularly discussed her cosmetic surgery procedures in interviews and on podcasts. Despite having her fourth procedure right now, Katie recently revealed that she regrets having one.
The BBL is popular with celebrities including Kim Kardashian and Kylie Jenner, and it involves injecting fat into the buttocks to enhance their size and shape.
The patient’s fat, which has been removed via liposuction, is used for the augmentation. Katie, the Mucky Mansion star, acknowledged that she was in severe pain after a botched Brazilian buttlift.
The former glamour model has undergone countless surgeries(Image: BACKGRID)
Katie acknowledged that surgery was the biggest mistake she ever made in speaking to Katherine Ryan on the What’s My Age Again podcast. When asked what the bum was, she responded, “The bum,” before adding, “I tried that BBL abroad where they take your own fat and put it in your bum.” It was so agonizing. And I just didn’t like it.
Katie’s thoughts on the heartbreaking emotional forces that drive her obsession with her appearance and constant change. Katie openly acknowledged in a recent TikTok live interview that she feels unworthy.
Katie looked stunning as she walked through the shallow waters(Image: BACKGRID)
Why does she keep getting surgery, a fan asked her. Katie responded, “That’s a very good question, so obviously I’ve had a lot of therapy because I’ve experienced trauma in my life.
“I believe that my experience with surgery stems from my feeling that I’m not good enough or validated when I was younger. There must have been a starting point there. I’ll admit that I enjoy having the surgery because it makes me look younger.
You can get old gracefully, but I don’t want to. I’m 47 in May, and when I look at people I went to school with, I think they look so old. I’ll take advantage of these procedures if they exist, and at least I’m being truthful.
Despite stunning in a tartan miniskirt and high-heeled boots, X Factor icon Rowetta still has a strong style, despite turning 57 years old, with an unrecognisable appearance.
Simon Cowell once famously described Rowetta as ‘amazing but barking bloody mad’(Image: Stuart Vance/ReachPlc)
After seeing one of the show’s original stars appear completely different nearly 20 years after discovering fame, X Factor fans might make a second opinion.
One of the standout acts on the very first season of The X Factor in 2004, was Rowetta Satchell, or simply Rowetta, as she was known to millions. The charismatic soul singer quickly became a favorite thanks to her unmatched performance in Lady Marmalade and her strong voice.
Rowetta, who was well-known from her days with the legendary band Happy Mondays, made it to the ITV talent show’s quarter-finals, finishing fourth overall and becoming the last woman standing without ever having to face the dreaded sing-off.
READ MORE: Happy Mondays icon Rowetta abruptly quits band after over three decades
Shaun Ryder and Rowetta Satchell of the Happy Mondays perform live on stage in 2012(Image: Redferns via Getty Images)
The 57-year-old is still a popular figure in 19 years. On her way to an Indie Reunion event, Rowetta recently posed in a tartan miniskirt and leopard-print thigh-high boots. The ravers united will never be defeated, she paired the look with a bold tee. She stated to her fans that she was “on my way.”
X Factor icon looks completely different two decades on from hit reality show(Image: Instagram/ @rowetta)
Continue reading the article.
Simon Cowell once famously described her as “amazing but barking bloody mad”, and it’s fair to say her bold style and fearless energy haven’t faded one bit.
In an interview with Metro.co.uk, the singer opened up about her journey on the ITV competition, her music career, and why she never returned to reality TV despite being flooded with offers.
According to Rowetta, after The X Factor propelled her to TV fame in 2004(Image: Instagram/ @rowetta)
According to Rowetta, after The X Factor propelled her to TV fame in 2004, she turned down shows like Big Brother and I’m A Celebrity, only making exceptions for Children in Need and BBC Music Day.
Before live auditions were a part of the show’s format, Rowetta’s journey began in Leeds when Kate Thornton introduced her to the judges. Simon and Sharon were wowed from the beginning with her renditions of Lady Marmalade and Circle of Life.
She expressed regret for not winning because Simon Cowell and she disagreed on the final single.
adding, “I believe it would have been a disaster if we had won it first, and then we would have to release songs like that.” Funky things are my favorite. For the rest of my life, I don’t want to spend doing Somewhere Over the Rainbow.
Rowetta claimed that her grandmother, who had pushed her to be on TV like the singers she saw, was the reason she did the show. Since then, she has collaborated with Shed Seven, Todd Terry, Oliver Heldens, and Solardo.
A proud Mancunian, Rowetta loves being a role model on her local music scene, often performing at Manchester Pride. She said that when she was growing up, “there was no one to look up to from Manchester that was Black and female.”
Continue reading the article.
Last year, in December 2024, it was announced that Rowetta would be leaving the band. The announcement came amidst speculation about past feuds with band member Shaun Ryder. In February this year, MailOnline reported Rowetta sharing that she has allegedly been physically abused by Shaun.
This story,do you like? Follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTube,and.net/@dailymirror” target=”_blank” aria-label=”[object Object]Link opens in a new tab.” tabindex=”0″>Threadsfor more latest news andgossip.
READ MORE: This white bedding set looks just like The White Company’s but costs over £85 less
Despite stunning in a tartan miniskirt and high-heeled boots, X Factor icon Rowetta still has a strong style, despite turning 57 years old, with an unrecognisable appearance.
Simon Cowell once famously described Rowetta as ‘amazing but barking bloody mad’(Image: Stuart Vance/ReachPlc)
After seeing one of the show’s original stars appear completely different nearly 20 years after discovering fame, X Factor fans might make a second opinion.
One of the standout acts on the very first season of The X Factor in 2004, was Rowetta Satchell, or simply Rowetta, as she was known to millions. The charismatic soul singer quickly became a favorite thanks to her unmatched performance in Lady Marmalade and her strong voice.
Rowetta, who was well-known from her days with the legendary band Happy Mondays, made it to the ITV talent show’s quarter-finals, finishing fourth overall and becoming the last woman standing without ever having to face the dreaded sing-off.
READ MORE: Happy Mondays icon Rowetta abruptly quits band after over three decades
Shaun Ryder and Rowetta Satchell of the Happy Mondays perform live on stage in 2012(Image: Redferns via Getty Images)
The 57-year-old is still a popular figure in 19 years. On her way to an Indie Reunion event, Rowetta recently posed in a tartan miniskirt and leopard-print thigh-high boots. The ravers united will never be defeated, she paired the look with a bold tee. She stated to her fans that she was “on my way.”
X Factor icon looks completely different two decades on from hit reality show(Image: Instagram/ @rowetta)
Continue reading the article.
Simon Cowell once famously described her as “amazing but barking bloody mad”, and it’s fair to say her bold style and fearless energy haven’t faded one bit.
In an interview with Metro.co.uk, the singer opened up about her journey on the ITV competition, her music career, and why she never returned to reality TV despite being flooded with offers.
According to Rowetta, after The X Factor propelled her to TV fame in 2004(Image: Instagram/ @rowetta)
According to Rowetta, after The X Factor propelled her to TV fame in 2004, she turned down shows like Big Brother and I’m A Celebrity, only making exceptions for Children in Need and BBC Music Day.
Before live auditions were a part of the show’s format, Rowetta’s journey began in Leeds when Kate Thornton introduced her to the judges. Simon and Sharon were wowed from the beginning with her renditions of Lady Marmalade and Circle of Life.
She expressed regret for not winning because Simon Cowell and she disagreed on the final single.
adding, “I believe it would have been a disaster if we had won it first, and then we would have to release songs like that.” Funky things are my favorite. For the rest of my life, I don’t want to spend doing Somewhere Over the Rainbow.
Rowetta claimed that her grandmother, who had pushed her to be on TV like the singers she saw, was the reason she did the show. Since then, she has collaborated with Shed Seven, Todd Terry, Oliver Heldens, and Solardo.
A proud Mancunian, Rowetta loves being a role model on her local music scene, often performing at Manchester Pride. She said that when she was growing up, “there was no one to look up to from Manchester that was Black and female.”
Continue reading the article.
Last year, in December 2024, it was announced that Rowetta would be leaving the band. The announcement came amidst speculation about past feuds with band member Shaun Ryder. In February this year, MailOnline reported Rowetta sharing that she has allegedly been physically abused by Shaun.
This story,do you like? Follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTube,and.net/@dailymirror” target=”_blank” aria-label=”[object Object]Link opens in a new tab.” tabindex=”0″>Threadsfor more latest news andgossip.
READ MORE: This white bedding set looks just like The White Company’s but costs over £85 less
CGC Bashir Adeniyi was chosen unanimously as Chairperson of the WCO Council, the highest decision-making body in global customs administration, just two years after President Bola Tinubu made his historic appointment as Comptroller-General of Customs at a meeting of the WCO Council in Brussels in June 2023.
The 145th/146th WCO Council Meetings, which took place on Saturday, June 28, 2025, at the WCO Headquarters in Brussels, were held as part of the final session.
The South African Revenue Service Commissioner, Edward Kieswetter, is succeeded by CGC Adeniyi, who becomes the first Nigerian to hold this prestigious position since the WCO’s founding.
CGC Adeniyi responded to the appointment by thanking the Council members for their trust in his leadership, describing the experience as historic and humbling for both Nigeria and the African Customs community as a whole.
He said, “This honor is not my own; it is a reflection of the Nigeria Customs Service’s collective progress and the transformative agenda we have pursued over the past two years.” In response to the complex realities of global trade, I pledge to uphold the WCO’s core values while also encouraging innovation, equity, and greater collaboration among member states.
Additionally, CGC Adeniyi thanked the Council for choosing him as chair. He affirmed his unwavering support for the World Customs Organization’s ongoing modernization efforts and his commitment to the implementation of its strategic plan for 2025-2028.
Adeniyi continued, “We are at a critical point in the evolution of global trade, where customs must strike a balance between sovereignty and cooperation, transparency with innovation, and facilitation with enforcement.” Working closely with member administrations and stakeholders to make the WCO a dynamic, forward-thinking institution that is appropriate for the challenges of today.
CGC also applauded the guidance and stability that his predecessor, Edward Kieswetter, had provided to the Council, and commended his efforts. He cited the solid foundations that his administration had for the success of the current reforms. The CGC added that he was confident in the Council’s upcoming sessions and that he was ready to encourage meaningful dialogue and progress among the world’s customs community.
The Convention on the Establishment of a Customs Co-operation Council established the WCO Council as the organization’s supreme governing body. Its primary goal is to promote global best practices, uniformity, and modernization among the customs administrations. The Council is informed by all WCO working bodies, whose policy decisions govern the activities of the 185 member states’ customs administrations.
Read more about Tinubu’s 400 000 More On Queue, and over 100 000 Nigerians Benefit from the Credit Scheme.
CGC Adeniyi is expected to lead the WCO Policy Commission in a strategic manner, leading the global trade agenda, and facilitating cross-border cooperation and digital transformation discussions.
He will also work closely with the WCO Secretariat, Mr. Ian Saunders, and Mr. Ian Saunders, to ensure that the organization’s Strategic Plan is carried out while supporting greater inclusivity, capacity expansion, and sustainability in customs operations, especially in developing nations.
The Chairperson also plays a significant diplomatic function, strengthening relationships with external partners, including the Private Sector Consultative Group (PSCG), international donor organizations, and multilateral trade organizations, as well as representing the WCO at high-level global forums.
The South African flag was respectfully lowered shortly after the Council Session while the Nigerian flag was hoisted at the WCO headquarters, a powerful gesture recognizing Nigeria’s leadership as Chair of the Council. This symbolic moment captured the significance of Nigeria’s ascent. Delegates applauded the scene, confirming Nigeria’s expanding influence in global customs affairs and praising the continent in its own right.
The British and Irish Lions eased to an eight-try 54-7 victory against Western Force in the first game of their tour on Australian soil.
Captain Dan Sheehan, Tomos Williams and Elliot Daly scored in a first half largely dominated by the profligate hosts in terms of territory but not on the scoreboard.
The Lions led 21-7 at the break, the Force’s own skipper Nic White crossing for their only try in front of 46,656, a record crowd for a rugby union game in Perth.
Beyond the break, it was all Lions, though.
Williams scored a blistering, breakaway second while Henry Pollock was in the sin-bin. The moment was overshadowed by Williams’ worrying looking injury in the process.
Getty Images
A flawed start and a worrying amount of possession and opportunity for the Force gave way to a strong win in the end for the Lions.
McCarthy was a compelling force up front as the Lions backline eventually ran amok.
They will sweat on what looked like a hamstring injury for Williams, who had been playing like a thoroughbred.
Jamison Gibson-Park has not yet played for these Lions, although he is expected to be available for midweek in Brisbane. It is a worry for coach Andy Farrell.
The Lions got off to a flyer on the night after a sustained bout of possession when Russell dipped into his box of tricks with a sumptuous cross-kick to Sheehan on the right wing.
Sheehan tapped to James Lowe, who gave it back to his captain for the score. The creator banged over the conversion.
A blistering beginning, but there was trouble ahead. Just as the Lions scored with their first attack, so too did the Force.
Again it was a slow turning of the screw before White sprung from the bottom of a ruck just short the line. Ben Donaldson was good with the conversion.
The Force were heavy underdogs but for 40 minutes they played with a confidence that belied their poor season in Super Rugby. They repeatedly got into the Lions 22 and time and again the tourists got pinged.
The Lions conceded five penalties in 80 minutes against the Pumas in Dublin. They conceded four in 10 minutes in Perth. Sheehan was warned about the ill discipline of his team as early as the 11th minute. This is not how it was supposed to be.
If the Force had been more accurate they would have capitalised on all those entries into the Lions 22.
They won a penalty and went for touch on the right, but nothing came of it. They won another penalty and went for touch on the left, but nothing came of that either.
Credit the tenacity of the Lions defence too, but they were doing much of it. When they got ball in hand, they were the polar opposite of the Force.
It must have been a sickener for the hosts when the visitors lifted the siege in their own territory only to score straight away.
A break from Ireland’s Josh van der Flier, a big burst from England’s Pollock and a support line from Wales’ Williams and over they went. Ruthless. More Force wastefulness followed and soon another Lions try arrived.
Like the first, it was Russell at the root of it, his tap penalty, break and offload putting Daly over. A minor scuffle broke out in the aftermath.
Getty Images
Lions run riot but Williams injury concern
A 14-point half-time lead for the Lions felt out of kilter with the flow of the game.
It got better, though. A lot better. Even with Pollock in the bin, the Lions struck out for a majestic score from inside their own 22.
Hansen got them moving but it was Lowe and Williams who did a supreme job in pulling the trigger, running and offloading before the scrum-half went over for his second score.
The downside – and it was a significant one – was the injury he picked up in the act of scoring.
It had everyone in the media seats scurrying around determining the whereabouts of Scotland’s Ben White (handily placed in New Zealand) and England’s Jack van Poortvliet (not so handy in Argentina).
As the Force tired, the Lions piled on the heat.
Ringrose went over for try number five after fine work by Hansen, and the combative and impressive McCarthy went over for number six after more terrific work from Pollock. Russell’s conversion brought up the 40-point mark.
Line-ups
Western Force: Donaldson, Grealy, Proctor, Stewart, Pietsch, Harford, White (capt); T Robertson, Paenga-Amosa, Hoskins, Carter, Swain, Harris, Champion de-Crespigny, Ekuasi
Replacements: Horton, Pearce, Tauakipulu, Faifua, Prinsep, H Robertson, Burey, Kuenzie
British and Irish Lions: Daly, Hansen, Ringrose, Tuipulotu, Lowe, Russell, Williams; Schoeman, Sheehan (capt), Furlong, Cummings, McCarthy, Beirne, Van der Flier, Pollock
As Canada pushes ahead with a new digital services tax on foreign and domestic technology companies, United States President Donald Trump has retaliated by ending all trade talks and threatened to impose additional tariffs on exports from Ottawa.
In a post on his Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump called the new Canadian tax structure a “direct and blatant attack on our country”, adding that Canada is “a very difficult country to trade with”.
“Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,” he wrote. He added that he would announce new tariffs of his own for Canada in a matter of days.
US companies such as Amazon, Meta, Google and Uber face an estimated $2bn in bills under the new tax.
Trump’s decision marks a sharp return to trade tensions between the two countries, abruptly ending a more cooperative phase since Mark Carney’s election as Canada’s prime minister in March.
It also marks a further escalation in the trade-as-pressure tactic under Trump’s second term in Washington.
The US is Canada’s largest trading partner by far, with more than 80 percent of Canadian exports destined for the US. In 2024, total bilateral goods trade exceeded US$762bn, with Canada exporting $412.7bn and importing $349.4bn – leaving the US, which counts Canada as its second-largest trading partner, with a goods deficit of $63.3bn.
A disruption due to tariffs on products like automobiles, minerals, energy or aluminium could have large ripple effects across both economies.
So, what is Canada’s digital tax? Why is Carney facing domestic pushback on the taxes? And how is Washington responding?
What is Canada’s digital services tax?
Canada’s Digital Services Tax Act (DSTA) came into force in June last year. It is a levy on tech revenues generated from Canadian users – even if providers do not have a physical presence in the country.
The DSTA was first proposed during the 2019 federal election under then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and received approval in Canada on June 20, 2024. It came into force a week later, on June 28. The first payments of this tax are due on Monday, June 30, 2025.
Large technology firms with global revenues exceeding $820m and Canadian revenues of more than $14.7m must pay a 3 percent levy on certain digital services revenues earned in Canada. Unlike traditional corporate taxes based on profits, this tax targets gross revenue linked to Canadian user engagement.
Digital services the levy will apply to include: Online marketplaces, social media platforms, digital advertising and the sale or licensing of user data.
One of the most contentious parts of the new framework for businesses is its retroactive nature, which demands payments on revenues dating back to January 1, 2022.
Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney walks with President Donald Trump after a group photo at the G7 Summit, on Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Canada [Mark Schiefelbein/AP]
Why is Trump suspending trade talks over the new tax?
On June 11, 21 US Congress members sent a letter to President Trump, urging him to pressure Canada to eliminate or pause its Digital Services Tax. “If Canada decides to move forward with this unprecedented, retroactive tax, it will set a terrible precedent that will have long-lasting impacts on global tax and trade practices,” they wrote.
Then, in a Truth Social post on Friday this week, Trump said Canada had confirmed it would continue with its new digital services tax “on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country”.
He added that the US would be “terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately” and that he would be levying new tariffs of his own on Canada within seven days.
“They have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products,” Trump said, adding, “We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.”
Later, at the Oval Office, Trump doubled down, saying: “We have all the cards. We have every single one.” He noted that the US holds “such power over Canada [economically]”. “We’d rather not use it,” Trump said, adding: “It’s not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it.
“Most of their business is with us, and when you have that circumstance, you treat people better.”
Trump also said he would order a Section 301 investigation under the Trade Act to assess the DSTA’s effect on US commerce, which could potentially lead to other punitive measures.
On Friday, White House National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett, told the Fox Business Friday programme: “They’re taxing American companies who don’t necessarily even have a presence in Canada.”
Calling the tax “almost criminal”, he said: “They’re going to have to remove it. And I think they know that.”
How has Canada responded?
Relations had seemed friendlier between the two North American neighbours in recent months as they continue with trade talks. Trump and former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had clashed previously – with Trump calling Trudeau “very dishonest” and “weak” during the 2018 G7 talks in Canada.
But newly elected Carney enjoyed a cordial visit with Trump in May at the White House, while Trump travelled to Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta on June 16 and 17. Carney said at the summit that the two had set a 30-day deadline for trade talks.
In a brief statement on Friday, Prime Minister Carney’s office said of Trump’s new threats to suspend trade talks over the digital tax: “The Canadian government will continue to engage in these complex negotiations with the United States in the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses.”
Last week, Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne told reporters that the digital tax could be negotiated as part of the broader, ongoing US-Canada trade discussions. “Obviously, all of that is something that we’re considering as part of broader discussions that you may have,” he had said.
Those discussions had been expected to result in a trade deal in July. However, they are now in limbo.
What do Canadian business leaders say?
Carney has been facing pressure from domestic businesses as well, which have lobbied the government to pause the digital services tax, underlining that the new framework would increase their costs for providing services and warning against retaliation from the US.
The Business Council of Canada, a nonprofit organisation representing CEOs and leaders of major Canadian companies, said in a statement that, for years, it “has warned that the implementation of a unilateral digital services tax could risk undermining Canada’s economic relationship with its most important trading partner, the United States”.
“That unfortunate development has now come to pass,” the statement noted. “In an effort to get trade negotiations back on track, Canada should put forward an immediate proposal to eliminate the DST in exchange for the elimination of tariffs from the United States.”
Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, from left, France’s President Emmanuel Macron, Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, President Donald Trump, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz participate in a session of the G7 Summit, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Canada (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) (AP)
Has Trump used tariffs to pressure Canada before?
Yes. Prior to the DSTA, Trump has used tariffs to pressure Canada over what he says is its role in the flow of the addictive drug, fentanyl, and undocumented migration into the US, as well as broader trade and economic issues.
On January 20, in his inaugural address, Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on all Canadian goods and a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy resources. Trump claimed that Canada has a “growing footprint” in fentanyl production, and alleged that Mexican cartels operate fentanyl labs in Canada, particularly in British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario.
These tariffs were paused for 30 days following assurances from Canada that appropriate action would be taken to curb the flow of fentanyl, and then re-imposed in early March.
Do other countries levy a similar digital tax?
Yes, several countries around the world have introduced digital services taxes (DSTs) similar to Canada’s. France was one of the first to introduce a DST in 2019, eliciting an angry response from Trump who was serving his first term as president. The French tax is a 3 percent levy on revenues from online advertising, digital platforms and sales of user data.
The UK followed with a 2 percent tax on revenues from social media platforms and search engines. Spain, Italy, and Austria have also implemented similar taxes, with rates ranging from 3 to 5 percent. Turkiye has one of the highest DST rates at 7.5 percent, covering a wide range of digital services such as content streaming and advertising.
Outside Europe, India has a 2 percent “equalisation levy” on foreign e-commerce operators which earn revenues from Indian users. Kenya and Indonesia have also created their own digital tax systems, though they’re structured slightly differently – Indonesia, for instance, applies Value Added Tax (VAT) – or sales tax – on foreign digital services, rather than a DST.
The US government has strongly opposed these taxes; some of these disputes have been paused as part of ongoing negotiations led by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an international organisation made up of 38 member countries, which is working on a global agreement for taxing digital companies fairly.
Canada held off on implementing its DST until 2024 to give time for the OECD talks. But when progress stalled, it went ahead with the 3 percent tax that applies retroactively since January 2022.
Should the EU be worried about this?
The European Union is likely to be watching this situation closely as digital tax is likely to be a key concern during its own trade talks with the US.
Trump has repeatedly warned that similar tax measures from other allies, including EU countries, could face severe retaliation.
Trump’s administration has previously objected to digital taxes introduced by EU member states like France, Italy, and Spain. In 2020, the US Trade Representative investigated these taxes under Section 301 and threatened retaliatory tariffs, though those were paused pending OECD-led global tax negotiations.
The European Commission has confirmed that digital taxation remains on the agenda, especially if a global deal under the OECD fails to materialise. President Ursula von der Leyen said on June 26 that “all options remain on the table” in trade discussions with the US, including enforcement mechanisms against discriminatory US measures.
The high-stakes trade negotiations ongoing between the US and the EU have a deadline for July 9 – the date that Trump’s 90-day pause on global reciprocal tariffs is due to expire. Trump has threatened to impose new tariffs of up to 50 percent on key European exports, including cars and steel, if a deal is not reached.
In response to these threats, the EU has prepared a list of retaliatory tariffs worth up to 95 billion euros ($111.4bn), which would target a broad range of US exports, from agricultural products to Boeing aircraft. EU leaders have signalled that they will defend the bloc’s tax sovereignty, while remaining open to negotiation.