Archive June 26, 2025

Alcaraz and the art of court positioning

Whether it is forehand, backhand or a slice, knowing what type of shot to play and when is key to winning tennis matches.

But so too is a player’s position on the court – with the very best in the world knowing where to be to anticipate a return, or to gain a few more valuable seconds to plan their next move.

Few are better masters of this art than Carlos Alcaraz, who is proving to be one of the most complete players on the tour at the moment.

Having won the French Open in his final match of the clay season, the 22-year-old Spaniard transitioned to grass seamlessly by winning Queen’s for the second time last week.

It sets him up perfectly for the pursuit of a third title in a row at Wimbledon, where his dominance of the court will once again come to the fore.

“He is so exciting,” former British number one John Lloyd told BBC Sport.

“He is so quick, lightning quick, groundstrokes are huge both sides. He has one of the best volleys on the tour, his serves are getting better and better.

“He is a showman and a great entertainer.”

From all over to behind the baseline – the evolution of play

To understand a bit more about why five-time Grand Slam champion Alcaraz is so good it is worth checking back on how tennis has changed over the years.

Playing styles have gone from almost every part of the court being covered by a player to the game now being predominantly fought out from behind the baseline.

Although improvements in grass maintenance will undoubtedly have played a part, this evolution can be seen in images from Wimbledon over the years, with more patches of wear evident on more areas of the grass in the 1970s and 1980s compared to more recent years.

The statistics that show the decline of the serve-and-volley game do seem to correspond with the changes to where grass wear at Wimbledon can be seen.

In 2002, serve-and-volley points in the men’s draw accounted for 32.6% of total service points won, but by 2018 that figure was down to 6.93%.

Skip image gallery

‘He takes the tour to new levels’ – how Alcaraz dominates the court

The above detail is relevant because Alcaraz has shown he is adept at both styles of play.

In last year’s men’s final at Wimbledon, the old and the new guard were matched up for the second year in a row as Alcaraz faced 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.

There, Alcaraz dictated play with his speed and movement, causing Djokovic to lose confidence in his ability to live with his opponent from the back of the court and instead rush to the net.

It was a trap that worked as Djokovic won just 50.9% of his points at the net, compared to 72.7% for Alcaraz.

But the younger man was just as strong when staying on the baseline where once again his quick movement and powerful ball striking was too much for Djokovic, who was placed under near constant pressure by Alcaraz.

“In that final, Djokovic was only able to generate three break points and won one, whereas Alcaraz was able to generate 14 break points and won five, so there was constant pressure on him,” says Craig O’Shannessy, tennis analyst and founder of Brain Game Tennis, who has worked with Djokovic.

“And from the ground stroke department Alcaraz had too much firepower from the back, hitting 21 forehand winners while Djokovic hit six.

Skip image gallery

Alcaraz’s dominance of the court was once again on show at Queen’s and, at 22, he has already won four grass-court titles – as many as compatriot Rafael Nadal secured in his career.

Nadal, of course, was the ‘King of Clay’ given his brilliance on that surface, but Alcaraz is showing proficiency on all court types.

“It is never a letdown with this player,” said former British number one Andrew Castle, who was commentating on the Queen’s tournament.

“Expectation every time he plays is always high and it is just supreme performances lately week in and week out.”

“His movement is incredible,” adds O’Shannessy.

“His acceleration from the first two or three steps helps him get to balls other players can’t, and then also his recovery out of the shot is incredibly fast as well.

“When I saw him up close and personal for the very first time, I was blown away. I didn’t think people could move that well on a tennis court.

Video analysis and warm-up tricks – getting the edge on an opponent

Being able to anticipate a player’s movement on the court and the type of shots they will probably play is key to securing victory, which is why someone as unpredictable as Alcaraz is so hard to play against.

Most players fall into familiar patterns of play and studying those becomes important in attempting to secure the edge.

“Gabriel Diallo is a guy I work with and he was playing in Majorca recently, and for his match with Jaume Munar I sent a detailed game plan to him on how to face him,” says O’Shannessy.

“Things I’ll usually show will include where the serve’s going, what kind of serve he likes to hit, and then where on the court he’s more vulnerable to make errors, particularly forehand errors. Because they happen more often than anything else.”

Another important battleground can be the warm-up.

Rather than being – as it may seem to those watching – just two players getting ready for the match, it also presents an opportunity to see how the opponent will react to certain types of shots.

“In the warm-up you may want to disguise the type of shots you want to hit,” adds O’Shannessy.

“I think it’s probably more of an advantage at the club level because you don’t necessarily know the opponent or have scouting on them.

Can anyone stop Alcaraz?

Alcaraz heads to Wimbledon looking to complete a hat-trick of titles and, having won his past 18 matches in a row, he is in a strong position to do just that.

World number one Jannik Sinner – who lost out to Alcaraz in an epic French Open final earlier this month – will be looking to stop him, as well as Djokovic, the runner-up in the past two Wimbledon finals.

But they will know they face a tough task against a player in form.

“When he’s on it, he is the most complete player of his age I have ever seen,” Lloyd says of Alcaraz.

“You look at him already and he’s the finished package.”

Castle is similarly impressed, adding: “He is setting new standards along with Jannik Sinner, the current number one.

Related topics

  • Tennis

My wife and daughters left behind a legacy of love, John Hunt tells BBC

Ashitha Nagesh
Victoria Derbyshire
BBC Image showing John Hunt, wearing a grey suit, and his daughter Amy Hunt, wearing a brown suit, speaking during an interview with the BBC's Victoria DerbyshireBBC

BBC racing commentator John Hunt, whose wife and two of his daughters were murdered last July, describes in an emotional first interview the legacy of love they left behind.

It was this, John and his daughter Amy tell the BBC, that had helped sustain them through their trauma and grief.

Carol, Louise and Hannah remained such a constant presence in their lives that he still talks to them every day, almost a year on from their deaths, John says.

“From the moment I wake up, I say good morning to each of them,” he says.

“Sometimes I say out loud to Hannah and Louise, ‘girls, sorry I can’t be with you, I’m with your mum at the moment’. As I close my eyes at night, I chat to them as well. They’re very close to me all the time.”

John and Amy say they took the decision to talk publicly now because they did not want their loved ones to be defined by their deaths. They also feel much of the initial reporting after the murders was inaccurate and it added to their pain.

They’ve also shared previously unseen family photos with the BBC.

Kyle Clifford fatally stabbed 61-year-old Carol, raped his former partner, Louise, 25, then used a crossbow to shoot both her and her sister Hannah, 28 – all at their family home in Bushey, Hertfordshire, in July last year.

Amy says the minute Clifford left their home on the day of the incident, “my mum, Hannah and Louise became a statistic. They became victims of Kyle Clifford.”

“I want to breathe life back into my mum, Hannah and Louise as fully-rounded people.”

Amy and John tell the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire they also strongly reject reports there were clear signs of abuse by Clifford during his relationship with Louise.

John Hunt, wearing grey suit, and daughter Amy, wearing brown suit

The Hunt family have always been extremely close.

In the early years of their marriage, Carol encouraged John – then a police officer – to pursue his dream of becoming a racing commentator.

That unending belief was inherited by their three daughters – Amy, the eldest, their middle daughter Hannah, and Louise, “the baby”. They talked all the time and shared everything with each other.

John, Carol, Hannah and Louise lived together in their home in Bushey, Hertfordshire. Louise ran a dog-grooming business from a pod in the garden and Hannah worked in aesthetics and beauty.

Their life, John says, was “one of complete happiness – awash with it, really”.

They remember one Friday night last May, two months before the murders, when the three sisters had gone out for sushi together.

“We were talking about how lucky we’d been as a family, to have had the parents we’ve had and the life we’ve had,” Amy says.

John agrees, and adds that when Hannah came home from the dinner, she was “typically effusive”.

“She came barnstorming through the door, and Carol said something like, ‘you had a lovely time?’ And she said, ‘do you know what, mum? We talked about how lucky we have been. We have been so lucky. We’ve not had a minute of concern or worry through the lives you’ve given us’,” he says.

“It’s a beautiful thing to recall. It was a beautiful thing to hear at the same time.”

While things were idyllic with the family, Louise and Clifford’s relationship had started to sour. At the end of June, Louise broke up with him.

Less than two weeks later, on 9 July, Clifford turned up at the family’s home on the pretext of returning some of Louise’s things.

Doorbell footage captured the moment Carol opened the door to Clifford, and greeted him with friendly advice.

“Maybe… maybe think in the next relationship,” she told him, “the way you are, maybe try and change. If you carry on like this you’ll end up on your own.” Clifford agreed, seemingly cordial, and told her he had started therapy.

Carol turned to go into the house, and Clifford followed her inside.

He then stabbed her multiple times, before waiting in the house for Louise to come back inside from her dog grooming pod. When she did, he restrained, raped, and killed her with a crossbow. When Hannah returned later, he shot her with the crossbow too.

In her dying moments, Hannah messaged her boyfriend, Alex, and managed to call 999. She was able to tell them what had happened and, crucially, who was responsible. John was in central London at the time. He believes Clifford intended to kill him too.

“Police officers of 30 years’ experience had their breath taken away by how brave she was, how she was able to think so clearly in that moment, to know what she needed to do,” John says.

Asked if Hannah’s actions saved his life, John adds: “That’s what I believe.

Hunt family / BBC News John and his familyHunt family / BBC News

As the news of the murders spread, the narrative spun out of control.

John says “from day one” their family – and in particular, Louise – was “completely misrepresented in the media and on social media”, including false suggestions Louise was in a controlling and coercive relationship with Kyle Clifford.

He and Amy recall misinformation on news sites, including the claim that John had been the one to discover his wife and daughters’ bodies in their home.

They also remember photographs being lifted from their loved ones’ social media pages by sections of the media without consent, something John describes as “grave-robbing”.

Amy recalls one newspaper headline reading, “Crossbow maniac was jilted”, a framing she describes as “victim-blaming”.

But most painful, they say, were claims in the press that there were clear signs of abuse and misogyny in Clifford’s relationship with Louise.

John and Amy say the family had misgivings about Clifford – there were things about him they didn’t particularly warm to. He was immature and, at times, inconsiderate. They say he couldn’t deal with conflict, and was bad at taking criticism. The family, including Louise, would talk to each other about Clifford’s lack of consideration.

But their relationship also seemed unremarkable, they say. The two of them would giggle and cuddle in the house, watch films together, cook together, go on holidays to Europe and take weekend trips to the seaside.

Hunt family / BBC News John and CarolHunt family / BBC News

A turning point came when the couple went away for a friend’s wedding. The night before the ceremony, Louise struggled to use the oven in their accommodation. The next day, when other wedding guests asked Louise what she did for a living, Clifford would interject with the barb that “one thing she doesn’t do is know how to work an oven properly”.

Clifford started to belittle her. When looking through the couple’s text messages after Louise’s death – something John says he found “very difficult to do” as the messages were personal to Louise – they noticed signs, from spring 2024, of “gentle manipulation”.

But did they notice anything at the time that suggested the relationship was abusive?

No, John says. Clifford never physically assaulted Louise when they were together. The family also never heard them raise their voices at each other.

“At the point of Louise ending [the relationship], there was absolutely evidence that he had turned out not to be a nice person,” Amy says.

“But I want to put it very bluntly now. Did we have any indication that this man was capable of stabbing my mother, of tying Louise up, of raping Louise, of shooting Louise and shooting Hannah? Absolutely not.

“He’s often been referred to as ‘crossbow killer’ and ‘crossbow maniac’ – but that takes away from the very real issue we know to be true. He was just a person, just a man… who went to the gym, had a family, had a relationship, watched TV.

In the months that followed the murders, John and Amy had to navigate a complex criminal justice system.

John makes a point of highlighting the “incredible people” who supported them – the police officers, their family liaison officers, their barrister, and the “compassionate” judge who oversaw the rape trial and sentenced Clifford. They were, they say, “very lucky to have met these people in these terrible circumstances”.

But, he adds, “each of them is working in a system that is clearly not fit for purpose”.

On the day Clifford appeared at magistrates’ court after being charged, John and Amy’s family liaison officers weren’t able to attend the hearing with them as they were at another murder in Luton.

“It just so happened that that morning in the magistrates’ court, they revealed aspects of the murders that we had not heard of at all, from anybody,” John says. “That was an awful day.”

Amy then found out the details of her sister Hannah’s final words on the phone to 999, from a newspaper headline.

When they spoke to the CPS about their concerns, they were given a complaint form and told to return it within 28 working days – “as if we’d had our bike stolen”.

On another day, when Clifford was due to enter his pleas, Amy says they were told the hearing needed to be postponed because the prison transport “didn’t turn up to take him to court”.

The proceedings were long and torturous for John and Amy. Clifford initially denied the charges against him, before pleading guilty to everything except the charge of rape. This meant the case had to go to trial. He was convicted in March.

Clifford refused to attend his sentencing later that month, meaning he did not hear the judge’s damning comments about him, or the devastating testimonies written by John and Amy.

“It’s consistently a system that prioritises the perpetrator,” Amy says. “That’s a traumatising thing for so many people.”

The Crown Prosecution Service says it has apologised, and it has “the utmost admiration for the Hunt family, who had the strength and courage to attend court every day and hear first-hand the devastating truth of what happened to Carol, Louise and Hannah.

Hunt family / BBC News Amy, Hannah, and LouiseHunt family / BBC News

In the months since the sentencing, John and Amy say they’ve been trying to focus on living again.

“When it happened I thought, ‘how on earth am I ever going to be able to care about anything ever again’?” John says.

“It’s fine to sit with that thought in the wreckage of what was our personal disaster. But you come to realise that, with a little bit of work, you can find some light again.”

He says they’ve found comfort in good counsellors and support groups, mindfulness exercises, and the love and support they have for each other.

But above all, every day he remembers Hannah’s final act, and how it saved his life. “I get to live,” he says. “Hannah gave me that, and I’ve got to treat it as a gift from her.”

My wife and daughters left behind a legacy of love, John Hunt tells BBC

Ashitha Nagesh
Derbyshire, Victoria
BBC Image showing John Hunt, wearing a grey suit, and his daughter Amy Hunt, wearing a brown suit, speaking during an interview with the BBC's Derbyshire, VictoriaBBC

BBC racing commentator John Hunt, whose wife and two of his daughters were murdered last July, describes in an emotional first interview the legacy of love they left behind.

According to John and his daughter Amy, it was this that had allowed them to endure their agony and trauma.

Carol, Louise and Hannah remained such a constant presence in their lives that he still talks to them every day, almost a year on from their deaths, John says.

He says, “I greet each of them when I wake up,” he says.

“Sometimes I say out loud to Hannah and Louise, ‘ girls, sorry I can’t be with you, I’m with your mum at the moment’. I chat with them as well as closing my eyes at night. They’re very close to me all the time”.

Because they don’t want their loved ones to be defined by their deaths, John and Amy say they made the decision to speak out now. They also feel much of the initial reporting after the murders was inaccurate and it added to their pain.

Additionally, they’ve shared family photos with the BBC that have never been seen.

Kyle Clifford fatally stabbed 61-year-old Carol, raped his former partner, Louise, 25, then used a crossbow to shoot both her and her sister Hannah, 28 – all at their family home in Bushey, Hertfordshire, in July last year.

My mother, Hannah, and Louise became a statistic, according to Amy, the moment Clifford left their home on the day of the incident. They became victims of Kyle Clifford”.

“I want to give my mother, Hannah, and Louise, who are all capable of being fully-rounded, new life.”

Amy and John tell the BBC’s Derbyshire, Victoria they also strongly reject reports there were clear signs of abuse by Clifford during his relationship with Louise.

John Hunt, wearing grey suit, and daughter Amy, wearing brown suit

The Hunt family has always had a close relationship.

In the early years of their marriage, Carol encouraged John – then a police officer – to pursue his dream of becoming a racing commentator.

Their three daughters, Amy, the eldest, Hannah, the middle daughter, and Louise, the “baby,” inherited that unwavering conviction. They talked all the time and shared everything with each other.

In their Bushey, Hertfordshire, house, John, Carol, Hannah, and Louise coexisted. Louise ran a dog-grooming business from a pod in the garden and Hannah worked in aesthetics and beauty.

According to John, their life was “one of complete happiness – awash with it, really.”

They remember one Friday night last May, two months before the murders, when the three sisters had gone out for sushi together.

We talked about how lucky we were as a family, having the right parents, and having a good life, Amy says.

John agrees, and adds that when Hannah came home from the dinner, she was “typically effusive”.

“She stormed through the door, and Carol said, “You had a lovely time,” she said. And she said, ‘ do you know what, mum? We discussed our level of affluence. We have been so lucky. Through your life, he claims, “we haven’t experienced a minute of worry or concern.”

“It’s a beautiful thing to recall. At the same time, it was beautiful to hear.

Although the family was happy, Louise and Clifford’s relationship had started to deteriorate. At the end of June, Louise broke up with him.

On the pretext of returning some of Louise’s items, Clifford showed up at the family’s home on July 9th, less than two weeks later.

Doorbell footage captured the moment Carol opened the door to Clifford, and greeted him with friendly advice.

She said to him, “Maybe… maybe think about it in the next relationship,” and perhaps try to change. If you carry on like this you’ll end up on your own”. Clifford accepted and informed her that he had begun therapy, which appeared to be cordial.

Carol turned to go into the house, and Clifford followed her inside.

After waiting in the house for Louise to return from her dog grooming pod, he then repeatedly stabbed her. When she did, he restrained, raped, and killed her with a crossbow. He also shot Hannah with the crossbow when she later came back.

In her dying moments, Hannah messaged her boyfriend, Alex, and managed to call 999. She was able to explain what had occurred to them and, crucially, who was at fault. John was in central London at the time. He thinks Clifford intended to murder him as well.

“Police officers of 30 years ‘ experience had their breath taken away by how brave she was, how she was able to think so clearly in that moment, to know what she needed to do”, John says.

When questioned about whether Hannah’s actions saved his life, John replies, “That’s what I think.”

 Hunt family / BBC News John and his family Hunt family / BBC News

The narrative grew too contrived as the murders’ stories became more and more prevalent.

John says” from day one “their family – and in particular, Louise – was” completely misrepresented in the media and on social media”, including false suggestions Louise was in a controlling and coercive relationship with Kyle Clifford.

He and Amy recall misinformation from news websites, including the claim that John was responsible for bringing his wife and daughters’ bodies into their home.

They also remember photographs being lifted from their loved ones ‘ social media pages by sections of the media without consent, something John describes as” grave-robbing”.

Amy recalls a newspaper headline that read, “Crossbow maniac was jilted,” a framing she calls “victim-blaming.”

But most painful, they say, were claims in the press that there were clear signs of abuse and misogyny in Clifford’s relationship with Louise.

The family, according to John and Amy, had reservations about Clifford because some aspects of him weren’t particularly warm to them. He was immature and, at times, inconsiderate. They claim that he struggled with conflict and was unattemptful. The family, including Louise, would talk to each other about Clifford’s lack of consideration.

They claim that their relationship sounded unremarkable. The two of them would giggle and cuddle in the house, watch films together, cook together, go on holidays to Europe and take weekend trips to the seaside.

 Hunt family / BBC News John and Carol Hunt family / BBC News

A turning point came when the couple went away for a friend’s wedding. Louise had trouble using the oven in their home the night before the wedding. The next day, when other wedding guests asked Louise what she did for a living, Clifford would interject with the barb that” one thing she doesn’t do is know how to work an oven properly”.

Clifford began to denigrate her. When looking through the couple’s text messages after Louise’s death – something John says he found” very difficult to do “as the messages were personal to Louise – they noticed signs, from spring 2024, of” gentle manipulation”.

But did they notice anything that suggested the relationship was abusive at the time?

No, John says. When Louise and Clifford were together, Cliff never physically assaulted her. The family also never heard them raise their voices at each other.

There was a clear indication that he had turned out to be a bad person at the time Louise and Louise ended the relationship, Amy claims.

” But I want to put it very bluntly now. Was there any evidence to support this man’s ability to murder my mother, tie up Louise, rape Louise, shoot Hannah and stab me? Absolutely not.

He’s frequently called a “crossbow killer” and a “crossbow maniac,” but that distracts from the very real problem that we are aware of. He was just a person, just a man… who went to the gym, had a family, had a relationship, watched TV.

In the months that followed the murders, John and Amy had to navigate a complex criminal justice system.

John makes a point of highlighting the”extraordinary people” who supported them: the police, their family liaison, their lawyer, and the compassionate judge who oversaw the rape trial and sentenced Clifford. They were, they say”, very lucky to have met these people in these terrible circumstances”.

He continues, “each of them is operating in a system that is obviously not fit for purpose.”

On the day Clifford appeared at magistrates ‘ court after being charged, John and Amy’s family liaison officers weren’t able to attend the hearing with them as they were at another murder in Luton.

“It just so happened that they uncovered aspects of the murders from nobody that we had not even heard of,” John says in the magistrates’ court that morning. That was an awful day. “

Then, using a newspaper headline, Amy learned the details of her sister Hannah’s final words.

When they spoke to the CPS about their concerns, they were given a complaint form and told to return it within 28 working days -” as if we’d had our bike stolen”.

Amy claims that the hearing was called off because the prison transportation “didn’t turn up to take him to court” on another day when Clifford was scheduled to enter his pleas.

The proceedings were long and torturous for John and Amy. Before entering a guilty plea, Clifford initially denied the allegations against him, with the exception of the rape one. This meant the case had to go to trial. In March, he was found guilty.

Clifford refused to attend his sentencing later that month, meaning he did not hear the judge’s damning comments about him, or the devastating testimonies written by John and Amy.

According to Amy, “It’s consistently a system that prioritizes the perpetrator.” That’s a traumatising thing for so many people. “

The Hunt family, who had the courage and strength to go to court every day and witness the harrowing truth of what happened to Carol, Louise, and Hannah, is described as having “the utmost admiration for the Hunt family.”

 Hunt family / BBC News Amy, Hannah, and Louise Hunt family / BBC News

In the months since the sentencing, John and Amy say they’ve been trying to focus on living again.

How on earth am I ever going to care about anything ever again when it happened? John says.

“It’s fine to sit there and contemplate that in the wreckage of our personal disaster.” But you come to realise that, with a little bit of work, you can find some light again”.

He claims that they have found solace in loving one another, supportive groups, mindfulness training, and good counsellors and support groups.

But above all, every day he remembers Hannah’s final act, and how it saved his life. He claims, “I get to live.” “Hannah gave me that, and I’ve got to treat it as a gift from her”.

Today’s horoscope for June 26 as Capricorn faces challenges in a new relationship

Aquarius should refrain from expressing his or her opinions on work-related issues while Taurus will keep money-related activities at a minimum according to today’s horoscope for Thursday, June 26.

Find out what’s written in the stars with our astrologer Russell Grant(Image: Daily Record/GettyImages)

One star sign is starting to feel pressured by commitments, while another has a comforting glimpse of hope awaited.

There are 12 zodiac signs – Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces – and the horoscopes for each can give you the lowdown on what your future holds, be it in work, your love life, your friends and family or more.

These daily forecasts have been compiled by astrologer Russell Grant, who has been reading star signs for over 50 years. From Aries through to Pisces, here’s what today could bring for your horoscope – and what you can do to be prepared.

Aries (Mar 21 – Apr 20)

You have put a lot of effort, thought, and effort into family and home issues. You will all agree that it is time to put some of the plans you just developed into action after talking to your roommates. You have a chance to begin these projects right away. Make the most of this rip.

Taurus (Apr 21 – May 21)

Before making a purchase or sale, think twice. Does this transaction actually need to be made? You must wait and take note of the best deals and opportunities, which is challenging. Choosing less than the best might lead to regret in the future. Keep money-related activities to a minimum.

Gemini (May 22 – June 21)

You don’t get such a good and inspiring day as often. Take advantage of this chance to make a special gift for yourself, shop, or meet up with friends. You might want to give something a helping hand by giving money or volunteering at a local event.

Continue reading the article.

Cancer (June 22 – July 23)

Physically and mentally, you are more energetic than usual. You can’t stay still because of this. Therefore, it won’t surprise you to discover that you become more impatient when things don’t go as planned. You’ll have to adapt and be more flexible because some people won’t be trustworthy.

Leo (July 24 – Aug 23)

You’ve had your fair share of difficulties, and it’s good to know that you’ve overcome them soon. On the horizon is a comforting glimpse of hope. Something will make you feel attracted to an offer, but something is. Sometimes it pays to trust your gut instincts.

Virgo (Aug 24 – Sept 23)

You wish you could give a friend more assistance than you do. You can’t always be there for them, though. You can then consider the numerous wonderful things that are happening in your own life right now and acknowledge how fortunate you are in the process.

Libra (Sept 24 – Oct 23)

You are starting to feel burdened by obligations and obligations from which you are now unable to turn. When you appear to be the one doing the majority of the work, a joint arrangement isn’t working. It’s difficult to explain how restricted you feel because of this.

Scorpio (Oct 24 – Nov 22)

You and a friend, neighbor, or coworker are surprisingly well on their feet. More than a platonic relationship, this seems to me. When you both intuitively believe there is a strong spiritual connection, it seems as though you both knew each other in a previous life.

Sagittarius (Nov 23 – Dec 21)

You’ll enjoy making new friends and participating in group activities a lot. Someone you meet will admire your abilities and inspire you to achieve great things or make yourself better than you had before. A passing acquaintance might turn into a close friend.

Capricorn (Dec 22 – Jan 20)

Particularly if your partner is having trouble understanding you, starting a new relationship will present challenges. Your partner will interpret your frequent absences because you have so many other commitments in your life. Make special arrangements for this evening. Create a sour relationship.

Aquarius (Jan 21 – Feb 19)

Don’t be afraid to voice your opinions on issues involving work. Even if you have a strong argument to the contrary of what they believe, your comments are unlikely to influence them. Some of the people you know will have strong opinions. Avoid éventuel disagreements when sharing your thoughts.

Continue reading the article.

Pisces (Feb 20 – Mar 20)

If you’ve been considering expanding your horizons, do something to help. You want to learn something new, take a different route, or learn new things, but nothing can do that until you do something. Someone from a different culture wants to tell you about their experiences.

READ MORE: This 26-piece strimmer set has all you need for tackling your garden this summer is now 30% less

Ecuador captures ‘Fito’, country’s most wanted fugitive gang leader

After almost 18 months on the run, Ecuador’s Los Choneros gang’s leader has been recaptured, according to President Daniel Noboa.

In January of this year, Jose Adolfo Macias, also known as “Fito,” escaped from Guayaquil Prison, where he was serving a 34-year sentence for drug trafficking and murder.

Noboa announced on Wednesday on the X social media platform that Macias will now be extradited to the US after being charged with drug trafficking and smuggling. He was charged with those crimes in a federal court.

Noboa had previously offered $1 million to assist in finding Macias after thousands of police officers and members of the armed forces were dispatched to his location.

“My sincere gratitude to the military and police who participated in this operation. More will fall, and we’ll regain our country. No agreement, Noboa claimed on X.

Authorities have not yet explained how Macias managed to escape before moving him to a maximum-security facility.

According to the US government, the successful escape “spreads widespread riots, bombings, kidnappings, the assassination of a prominent prosecutor, and an armed attack on a TV network during a live broadcast,” leading Noboa to declare a 60-day state of emergency in Ecuador.

Additionally, the president of Ecuador referred to 22 gangs as “terrorist groups,” including Los Choneros.

In February 2024, the US Department of Treasury issued separate sanctions against both Macias and Los Choneros for causing violence in Ecuador and trafficking drugs.

Ecuador was once one of Latin America’s most tranquil nations, but because of its proximity to Peru and Colombia, two of the world’s top cocaine exporters, criminal organizations have become increasingly interested in its exports.

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy urges trial for ‘war criminal’ Putin

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, has demanded that Vladimir Putin be charged with being a “war criminal” for starting Russia’s assault on Ukraine.

After signing a deal with the Council of Europe to establish a special tribunal to prosecute Russian officials, including Putin, for the invasion of Ukraine, Zelenskyy called late on Wednesday.

After signing the agreement with Council of Europe Secretary-General Alain Berset, Zelenskyy said, “We must show clearly that aggression leads to punishment, and we must force it all over Europe.”

Every Russian war criminal, including Putin, will need strong political and legal courage, Zelenskyy said.

For the alleged war crime of illegally removing children from Ukraine, Putin is already facing an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

The ICC is authorized to investigate war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, but it is not authorized to investigate “crimes of aggression” or the use of force against another state.

The “crime of aggression” against Russia for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 is the subject of the creation of the special tribunal. In theory, the tribunal could trial prominent Russian figures, including Putin.

Although it is not yet known where the tribunal’s location will be, Zelenskyy claimed the ICC’s home would be “perfect.”

The Council of Europe, the continent’s top rights body, is the first organization to establish such a tribunal.

The special tribunal will “give Ukraine a path to justice for the top-level decision to invade its territory,” according to Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.

The proposed tribunal, according to the European Council, could be used to prosecute those who aided Russia in the invasion of North Korea and Belarus.

The Council of Europe, which has 46 members, is not a member of the European Union, and includes important non-EU countries like Turkiye, the UK, and Ukraine. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia was removed from the body.