Archive May 3, 2025

Alec Baldwin’s new Western haunted by fatal on-set shooting finally makes it to screens

More than three years on from the deadly on-set shooting of celebrated cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, Alec Baldwin’s Rust is now finally available to watch, while the tragedy continues to overshadow the release

Alec Baldwin’s Rust has now finally been released

Alec Baldwin’s long-awaited Western epic Rust is finally being released, three and a half years after tragedy rocked the set.

Set in the 1880s, Rust stars Baldwin as Harland Rust, an outlaw who helps his 13-year-old grandson Lucas (Patrick Scott McDermott) flee to Mexico after he accidentally kills a rancher. Sadly, life imitated art in the most shocking way after Baldwin accidentally shot cinematographer Halyna Hutchins using a prop gun, causing her death.

Director Joel Souza was also injured during the horror incident, which occurred during a rehearsal at a New Mexico ranch on October 21, 2021, with the bullet becoming lodged in his shoulder.

Ukrainian-born Halyna was just 42 years old when she died, leaving behind her husband, Matthew Hutchins and their young son, Andros Hutchins. Her death sent shockwaves throughout the film community, and production of Rust was shut down in the aftermath, as Santa Fe County sheriff’s deputies and New Mexico’s occupational safety agents took over Bonanza Creek Ranch, the original filming location.

READ MORE: Alec Baldwin’s wife’s phone call to agent sparks major career move for family

 Halyna Hutchins
Halyna Hutchins died following a horror incident with a prop gun(Image: Halyna Hutchins/Instagram)

The investigation continued for more than a year, during which three people faced criminal charges: Baldwin, armourer Hannah Gutierrez, and assistant director David Halls, who had presided over on-set safety.

Article continues below

Baldwin was charged with involuntary manslaughter in 2022, meaning he was accused of causing another person’s death through careless actions. However, these charges were ultimately scrapped three days into Baldwin’s trial in July 2024, after his defence attorneys raised questions over how the evidence had been handled by New Mexico law enforcement officers and prosecutors.

The multi-Oscar nominee also faced a civil lawsuit from Halyna’s family, and in March 2023, he and the film producers agreed to a financial settlement with the family. Baldwin, 67, faced criticism for not checking the prop gun before using it, raising conversations about the importance of safety on film sets. The Golden Globe-winning actor denied any intentional wrongdoing, asserting that he hadn’t pulled the trigger and that the gun had been fired accidentally.

This file handout photo released April 25, 2022 courtesy of Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office and part of the investigative files, shows US actor Alec Baldwin being processed after the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the setr of the film
Baldwin’s charge of involuntary manslaughter was ultimately scrapped(Image: Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office)

In January of this year, Baldwin filed a malicious prosecution civil lawsuit against New Mexico prosecutors and law enforcement, alleging that defendants had been “blinded by their desire to convict Alec Baldwin for all the wrong reasons, and at any cost”. The lawsuit continues: “Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law.”

Back in March 2024, Gutierrez was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. As reported by The Los Angeles Times, Gutierrez has served almost 14 months in prison, and it’s expected she will be released later this month. Meanwhile, Halls, who pleaded no contest to a single count of negligent use of a deadly weapon, gave testimony during Gutierrez’s trial, and has since left the film business altogether.

Production resumed in Montana approximately 18 months after Halyna’s death, with filmmakers explaining that they wanted to complete the movie as a tribute to the gifted cinematographer. Discussing this decision with NPR last autumn, director Souza admitted: “It was a really tough decision, and I’ll be very honest — I was a wreck through most of the second go-round.”

 Alec Baldwin hugs his attorney Alex Spiro at the conclusion of his trial for involuntary manslaughter in First Judicial District Court on July 12, 2024 in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Golden Globe-winning actor Baldwin denied any intentional wrongdoing(Image: Getty Images)

He continued: “Obviously, the human cost and the tragedy of it overshadows everything, rightfully so, and is so much more important than any movie. I guess I just wonder if people will sort of see past that and engage with it as a film, or if it will be a thing where people just can’t ever separate the movie from what happened during its filming.”

After the film premiered at the Camerimage Film Festival in Poland back in November, Halyna’s mother, Olga Solovey, issued the following statement: “Alec Baldwin continues to increase my pain with his refusal to apologise to me and his refusal to take responsibility for her death.”

Proceeds from the film will go towards the settlement of a wrongful death lawsuit brought by Halyna’s widower, Matthew, who became an executive producer of the film, and son Andros, who was just nine years old at the time of his mother’s death.

Cinematographer Bianca Cline took over from Halyna as director of photography, with Souza telling The Guardian that he’d insisted on a woman filling the position. He explained: “The agencies throw male candidates at you, but I know there are a lot of women coming out of the American Film Institute. Then somebody told me, ‘Women can’t shoot westerns.’ And I thought, ‘F*** you. I’m going to stick that up your a** and only look at women’.”

Halyna Hutchins
The film was completed as a tribute to Halyna(Image: Halyna Hutchins/Instagram)

There were also a number of significant case changes, with actors Jensen Ackles and Swen Temmel no longer appearing in the finished feature. Rust is now available to stream via Apple, Amazon, and other video-on-demand platforms, and it will also be played at select cinemas across the US. A UK release date has not yet been given.

In their reality series The Baldwins, which premiered back in February, Baldwin’s wife, Hilaria, spoke of the “survivor’s guilt” her husband had been left with in the aftermath of the tragedy. Addressing the cameras, Hilaria told viewers: “I found these text messages the other day, between us, you know, the day after. And you know, he said he wanted to kill himself.” She continued: “He has survivor’s guilt. You’re involved in this thing that nobody could even possibly imagine. And so it goes back to that day. He wishes it were him. He would change places in a second. This has affected his health and his mental health tremendously.

“The past few years, all of a sudden, he started having heart problems. He’s been hospitalised multiple times. He’s fainted… everybody’s just screaming, I’m going, I’m on top, and I’m shaking him. It’s hard sometimes. But hopefully we’re in the hardest, but tail end of it.”

The Baldwins was made as Baldwin prepared for his involuntary manslaughter trial. The second episode followed Alec and Hilaria as they faced his upcoming court date, with Baldwin opening up about how his mental health had declined to the point where he felt unable to

Baldwin shared: “There was a period all this last year where I’d lay in bed and I’d think I don’t want to get out of bed. I’d think to myself, my children are downstairs having breakfast.”

Crediting Hilaria with being his rock throughout this dark period, he added: “The last year was the year in which I think that they noticed I was really, really down. But the person who saved me was my wife because she got up. There were times she didn’t want to either, but she did, that’s the difference.”

Article continues below

For emotional support, you can call the Samaritans 24-hour helpline on 116 123, email jo@samaritans.org, visit a Samaritans branch in person or go to the Samaritans website.

Do you have a story to share? Email me at julia.banim@reachplc.com. Follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads

READ MORE: Alec Baldwin’s wife offers health update after decision to have ‘procedure’

‘Don’t see a major war with India, but have to be ready’: Pakistan ex-NSA

India and Pakistan are in danger of a military conflict, with Pakistan and Pakistan standing on the verge of a standoff after 11 days when gunmen killed 26 people in the picturesque Baisaran valley in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The nuclear-armed neighbours have each announced a series of tit-for-tat steps against the other since the attack on April 22, which India has implicitly blamed Pakistan for, even as Islamabad has denied any role in the killings.

India has withdrawn from the Indus Waters Treaty, which establishes a water-sharing arrangement for Pakistan. A previous ceasefire line between them in Kashmir, a disputed region that they both claim in its entirety, was recognized as a Line of Control (LoC) by both countries in the 1972 Simla Agreement, which threatened to force Pakistan to withdraw from the agreement. Both nations have also expelled each other’s citizens and scaled back their diplomatic missions.

Despite a ceasefire agreement in place since 2021, the most recent upheaval follows a 40-person fatal attack on Indian soldiers in Pulwama, in Indian-administered Kashmir, that India launched air strikes on Pakistani soil in 2019. They have recently exchanged fire across the LoC.

And the region is now on edge, amid growing expectations that India might launch a military operation against Pakistan this time too.

However, both nations have also spoken with their counterparts diplomatically. Secretary of State Marco Rubio pleaded with S Jaishankar and Shehbaz Sharif, the prime minister of Pakistan, to find a de-escalation on Wednesday. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called his Indian counterpart, Rajnath Singh, on Thursday to condemn the attack and offered “strong support” to India.

Sharif met with China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, three of Pakistan’s allies, to ask for their assistance. He also urged the two Gulf countries’ ambassadors to “impress upon India to de-escalate and defuse tensions.”

Moeed Yusuf, a Pakistani national security adviser (NSA) under former prime minister Imran Khan, spoke with Al Jazeera to understand how Pakistani strategists who have worked on ties with India view what might come next.

Prior to his role as NSA, Yusuf also worked as a special adviser to Khan on matters related to national security starting in December 2019, four months after the Indian government, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, revoked the special status of Indian-administered Kashmir.

On May 2, 2025, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, left, and the Saudi Arabian ambassador Nawaf bin Saeed Al-Maliky met in Islamabad.

Yusuf, who is based in Lahore, is currently the vice chancellor of a private university and the author of and editor of several books on regional security and South Asia. His most recent book, Brokering Peace in Nuclear Environments: US Crisis Management in South Asia, was published in 2018.

Al Jazeera: How would you rate the actions taken by both sides so far in the crisis?

Moeed Yusuf: Pakistan and India have long struggled with managing crises. They don’t have a bilateral crisis management mechanism, which is the fundamental concern.

Relying on third parties as the main crisis management tool has been used by both parties, with the intention of preventing both parties from escalating the situation and preventing it from escalation.

The issue that India has encountered this time is that they have followed the old rules, but that the United States’ leader hasn’t campaigned in its place.

It appears that they have so far taken a neutral and a hands-off position, as indicated by President Donald Trump few days ago. Trump claimed to be aware of the leaders of both India and Pakistan and that he believed they could resolve the conflict alone.

Both Pakistan and India have historically been at odds with one another, and that is how it has historically been. This time too, a number of punitive steps have been announced.

Even when things improve, and they may wish to do so, these are simple to set in motion but very difficult to reverse.

Unfortunately, in every situation where they are at odds with one another, the retaliatory measures are getting more and more significant, as India has decided to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, which is against the law because it doesn’t have any provisions in it.

Al Jazeera: Do you believe a strike is imminent and if both sides are indicating preparedness for a showdown?

Yusuf: It’s impossible to say in such a situation. India’s plan of action is still possible and plausible, but the time has come to consider imminent events.

What usually happens in crises is that countries pick up troop or logistics movements, or their allies inform them, or they rely on ground intelligence to determine what might happen. These can occasionally be misinterpreted, leading to misreading them for the offensive side to believe an attack might be coming when it isn’t, or for the defensive side to believe otherwise.

Pakistan must show unwavering commitment to take any chance. You don’t know what will come next, so you have to be ready.

Despite that, I don’t believe we will have a major war, but one misinterpretation or miscalculation can result in significant things.

Al Jazeera: How do you feel about the US, China, and the Gulf States’ involvement in this crisis, and how would you compare it to earlier ones?

Yusuf: My last book, Brokering Peace (2018) was on the third-party management in Pakistan-India context, and this is such a vital element for both as they have internalised and built it into their calculus that a third-party country will inevitably come in.

Instead of escalating further, the idea is that a third-party mediator will intervene and the two countries will agree to stop because that is what they really want.

Since the 1999 Kargil War, the United States has dominated the group of third-party nations. (Pakistani forces crossed the LoC to try to take control of strategic heights in Ladakh’s Kargil, but India eventually managed to take back the territory. Bill Clinton, then-US president, is credited with putting an end to that conflict.

Everyone else supports the US position, which places the need for immediate de-escalation above all else during the crisis, including China.

This changed somewhat in the 2016 surgical strikes and 2019 Pulwama crisis when the US leaned heavily on India’s side, perhaps unwittingly even emboldening them to act in 2019.

After 19 Indian soldiers were killed in an attack on an army base in Uri, Indian-administered Kashmir, Indian troops launched a cross-border “surgical strike” that New Delhi claimed targeted armed fighters planning to attack India. After the attack on the Indian military convoy that left 40 soldiers dead, Indian fighter jets bombed what New Delhi claimed were “terrorists”‘ bases in Balakot, in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. India and Pakistan then engaged in an aerial dogfight, and an Indian pilot was captured and subsequently returned.)

However, this time, the White House has a president who turned around and instructed both Pakistan and India to figure it out for themselves.

Because of Pakistan, they had previously discounted the possibility of significant US support, believing they had become too close to India as a result of their strategic relationship, which I believe has hurt them more than Pakistan.

But India would have been hoping for the Americans to put their foot down and pressure Pakistan, which did not exactly materialise. The secretary of state Marco Rubio is being called once more to urge both countries to end their war.

What they have done has, oddly enough, still contributed to India’s situation so far, given that, until now, they didn’t feel as pressured to act as they might have during Pulwama in 2019.

Gulf countries have played a more active role than before. China has also made a restraint statement.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Since 2014, when India’s relations with Pakistan have remained strained, has Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi been in power?Abdul Saboor/AP Photo

Al Jazeera: How has Pakistan’s relationship with India evolved in recent years?

Yusuf: The relationship between the two nations has undergone a radical change. Despite serious issues and India’s unilateral actions in Kashmir in 2019, we witnessed both back-channel negotiations and a ceasefire agreement.

We have tried to move ahead and reduce India’s incentive to destabilise Pakistan, but I think India has lost that opportunity due to its own intransigence, hubris and an ideological bent that continues to force them to demean and threaten Pakistan.

The leadership there is now convinced that the restraint policy was unsuccessful, and India has mishandled and abused Pakistan’s offers for dialogue.

Pakistan shouldn’t be pleading either if India doesn’t want to talk. If India does reach out, we will likely respond, but there isn’t any desperation in Pakistan at all.

For either nation, this is not a pleasant place to live. I’ve long held the conviction that improving their relationship will ultimately help Pakistan get where we want to go economically and India get where it says it wants to go regionally. For now, though, with the current Indian attitude, unfortunately, I see little hope.

Al Jazeera: Do you anticipate any direct India-Pakistan discussions occurring during or after this crisis?

Yes, I’m not sure when or with whom it will be, but I believe one of the most important lessons that Indians could learn is that trying to isolate Pakistan is ineffective.

Indus Water Treaty in abeyance? Potential suspension of the SIMLA Agreement The two nations will need to talk through these important decisions, and I believe they will do so at some point in the future.

But I also don’t think that Pakistan will make a move towards rapprochement, as we have offered opportunities for dialogues so many times recently to no avail. As I mentioned, Pakistan’s attitude toward this issue has also gotten worse.

In the end, Indians must ultimately choose whether or not to talk. If they come forth, I think Pakistan will still respond positively to it.

Trump plans to cut 1,200 jobs from CIA, other US spy agencies: Report

According to The Washington Post, US President Donald Trump’s administration is considering making significant personnel cuts at key government departments like the CIA and other important US spy agencies.

The CIA plans to eliminate 1,200 positions in the US intelligence community, along with thousands more, according to a report released on Friday.

According to the report, members of Congress have been informed of the planned cuts, which will occur over a number of years and be primarily accomplished through hiring reductions rather than layoffs.

The CIA director, John Ratcliffe, “is moving quickly to ensure the CIA workforce is responsive to the administration’s national security priorities,” a spokesperson for the organization said when asked about the report.

The spokesperson added that “these actions are a part of a holistic strategy to infuse the agency with renewed energy, provide opportunities for rising leaders to emerge, and better position CIA to fulfill its mission.”

Ratcliffe, a Trump appointee, sworn in as the agency’s director in January, previously promised lawmakers that the agency would “produce insightful, objective, all-source analysis without allowing political or personal biases to cloud our judgment or infect our products.”

No matter how dark or difficult it may be, “we will gather intelligence, especially human intelligence,” he declared, as well as “conduct covert action under the president’s direction, going places no one else can go, and doing things no one else can do.”

When he addressed CIA officers, he said, “Belize and get ready to make a difference if all of this sounds like what you signed up for.” If not, then it’s time to start a new line of work.

As part of Trump’s government’s downsizing strategy, the CIA also announced in March that it would fire an undetermined number of junior officers.

Not everyone who demonstrates aptitude for the job will be able to handle the demands of the job, according to a spokesperson for the organization. Officers with behavioral issues or those who are deemed to be poor candidates for intelligence work will be fired.

Second US military zone along border with Mexico set up to deter migrants

Following the announcement last month that a second military zone belonged to New Mexico along the border, the US military has added a Texas area where troops can temporarily detain trespassers.

President Donald Trump has increased troop levels at the southern border, pledged to deport millions of Americans, and announced the creation of a new military camp as a result of his aggressive anti-immigration crackdown on immigration.

Children who are citizens of the United States were some of the people the Trump administration deported.

A 100-kilometer (63-mile) strip east of the Texas-New Mexico border in El Paso, the US military announced late on Thursday that it had established the “Texas National Defense Area.”

The detainees will then be handed over to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or another civilian law enforcement, which has authority over illegal border crossings, according to the Pentagon.

A 270km-long, 18-meter-wide (60 feet by 170 miles) strip along New Mexico’s base was designated a “National Defense Area” by the Trump administration in April.

According to the US Attorney’s Office, 82 people have been charged with entering the New Mexico military zone so far. None of them were detained by US forces, and CBP officials handled them.

Without violating the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows a president to deploy the US military only to suppress civil unrest, the Trump administration is authorized to use its military forces to detain migrants in the military zones.

At the border with Mexico, about 11, 900 US soldiers are currently stationed. The number of migrants who were caught entering the US illegally in March was at its lowest level ever, according to government data.

Republican governor of Texas Gregg Abbott wrote, “Texas continues to work with the Trump Administration to stop illegal immigration,” on Thursday, posting images of a razor wire barrier construction on the border.

Abbott has border security deployed the state’s National Guard and police since 2021.

Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico has opposed what she has referred to as a “deportation buffer zone.”

Virginia Giuffre’s family launch fundraiser and share plans for sweet memorial

The family also pledged to fight the state’s efforts to stop predators from escaping justice in Virginia and for a new version of the law. They vowed to “take on her mission with all of our hearts and souls”

Virginia’s family want to find a way to leave her mark of legacy(Image: PA)

The 41-year-old who was tragically found dead at her home on April 25 has been given the go-ahead by Virginia Giuffre’s family, who has revealed plans to build a sweet memorial in her honor.

Virginia, who alleged that paedophile Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her for sex at the age of 16, made headlines after accusing Prince Andrew, now 65, of sexually abusing her while she was a teenager. He has repeatedly denied the claims and, in 2022, paid Virginia an undisclosed sum in an out-of-court settlement. It’s been reported that the agreement did not admit liability.

It was announced last week that Virginia, who was living in Australia after relocating from the US, had died aged 41. Her family said that she had taken her own life.

READ MORE: Gene Hackman’s secret burial and cryptic unmarked grave after £62m inheritance snub

Danny, right, posted this picture alongside a tribute to his sister Virginia, centre
Danny, right, posted this picture alongside a tribute to his sister Virginia, centre(Image: Facebook)

Amanda Roberts, sister-in-law of Virginia Giuffre, has now launched a GoFundMe page and shared thee family plans to create a public memorial for Virginia.

Continue reading the article.

The fundraiser, which was created on Friday , May 2, shows the following message: “First and foremost, thank you for the outpouring of love and support for our beloved Virginia. We know Virginia was not just a bright light to us but to many. The lives she touched, the strength, and the fight she has given us will live with us always.

We are aware that this will make us stronger, which Virginia would have desired, despite the fact that our family and many of us are grieving unfathomably. We believe that finding a way to leave her legacy is essential. Through her fight and testimony, Virginia was able to amass settlements, but unfortunately, as many of you may be aware, funds and estates can take years to settle due to this tragedy. Her family in America is dedicated to preserving and honoring her spirit despite her estate being settled in Australia.

“It is our intention with this fund that we create a public memorial not just for family but for survivors and supporters from all over to visit and share space with Virginia. She deserves to have a permanent mark in this world that demonstrates her lasting impact.”

Virginia Guiffre alleges she was made to sleep with the Duke on three separate occasions when she was 17
Virginia Giuffre was reportedly estranged from her children in the lead up to her death(Image: BBC)

The family also pledged to fight the state’s efforts to stop predators from escaping justice in Virginia and for a new version of the law. They vowed to “take on her mission with all of our hearts and souls”.

A handwritten letter penned shortly before her death, declaring that her “voice will not be silenced” was recently shared by online by Amanda. The letter reads: “Mothers, Fathers, Sisters, and Brothers need to show the battle lines are drawn, and stand together to fight for the future of victims.” She added: “Is protesting the answer? I don’t know. But we’ve got to start somewhere.”

The fundraiser has, at the time of publication, raised $680 from five generous donations. You can donate by clicking here.

The Samaritans have a free helpline that is available 24/7, accessible at 116 123, for those who are struggling and need to talk. You can also contact Jo at jo@samaritans.org or visit their website to find your local branch.

If you are 18 or under and have experienced this story, call Childline on 0800 1111. The NSPCC Helpline can also be reached by dialing 0808 800 500 or emailing help@nspcc.org. uk. Call 999 if a child is in immediate danger.

Continue reading the article.

Gene Hackman’s secret burial and cryptic unmarked grave after £62m inheritance snub

Two months after his death, Gene Hackman was buried in New Mexico next to his wife Betsy Arakawa. However, the arrangement’s children placed him in an unmarked grave, which they later made.

Due to the extensive investigation, the pair were not buried until two months after their deaths(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Gene Hackman’s burial details were finally revealed as he was laid to rest after he and his wife were found dead and partially mummified in their mansion in Santa Fe, New Mexico in February.

At the age of 95, Hackman’s final resting place is in New Mexico, where he lies next to his spouse Betsy Arakawa, but his grave was left unmarked. His final farewell was orchestrated by his children who were excluded from his will, as reported by the MailOnline.

The controversy centered on Hackman’s substantial $62 million fortune. His estate was initially intended to be transferred to successor trustees, who have since passed away. Due to the unanticipated circumstance, a judge approved an emergency petition to temporarily change the trustee.

READ MORE: Hero dad, 38, drowns trying to save son and niece from rip current at Florida beach

Gene Hackman arrives with his wife, Betsy Arakawa, for the 60th Annual Golden Globe Awards in Beverly Hills
Gene Hackman arrives with his wife, Betsy Arakawa, for the 60th Annual Golden Globe Awards in Beverly Hills(Image: AP)

There is uncertainty over the heirship of Hackman’s assets, particularly his children, Christopher, Elizabeth, and Leslie Hackma, who were not named as beneficiaries when his wife passed away unexpectedly.

Continue reading the article.

Despite being overlooked in the testament, they could potentially be regarded as rightful heirs by default. According to Tre Lovell, a California lawyer speaking with the BBC, “The estate will actually be probated in accordance with intestate succession laws and the children would be lawfully next in line to inherit.”

Gene openly discussed the tensions between his acting and home life in an interview with the New York Times in 1989, revealing that he had “become very selfish” as an actor. Even though my family was small, I would occasionally take jobs that would separate us for three or four months. The temptations, the reward, and recognition made it too much for the poor boy in me.

The extensive nature of the investigation delayed their burial, rendering them unable to be laid to rest until two full months after their passing, with the funeral proceedings being conducted in strict privacy, reports Irish Star.

Gene Hackman
His final farewell was orchestrated by his children who were left out of the will(Image: AP)

Authorities now have confirmed Hackman passed away in a cruel week following his better half’s departure due to severe heart disease that was made worse by Alzheimer’s complications.

Gene’s final days are revealed in detail thanks to the details found in Gene’s autopsy report, particularly when acetone is present in his system. This suggests that he may have abstained from eating up until his own famine after his deeply dependent death, like his father.

Continue reading the article.

Sources claim Gene’s body had a acetone level of 5.3 mg/dL, which is in stark contrast to the normal peak blood level of 0.3 mg/dL, indicating a protracted period of fasting before his death.