Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Archive May 15, 2025

In Gaza, the Nakba is being relived in 2025

The Nakba. It’s a concept that accompanied me from birth until I lived through it myself these past two years.

I was born a refugee in the Khan Younis camp, known by the city’s residents as the largest gathering of refugees expelled from their lands during the Nakba, when Israel was founded in 1948.

Whenever someone asked me my name, it was always followed by: “Are you a refugee or a citizen?”

‘What is a refugee?’

As a child, I would ask: “What is a refugee?”

I attended a school run by UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, and my documents always had to include proof that I was a refugee.

I received treatment at UNRWA clinics, always needing to bring that refugee card.

I spent a lot of time trying to understand what being a refugee meant. How did my grandparents flee their land in Beit Daras, a village north of the Gaza Strip that no longer exists? How did my grandfather end up in this camp, and why did he choose this place?

Before Israel’s war on Gaza, May 15, or Nakba Day, the day Palestinians commemorate the Nakba, was a unique occasion. Everyone paid attention to it, seeking out people who had lived through it to hear their stories.

When I began working as a journalist in 2015, Nakba Day was one of the events I looked forward to covering. That year, I went along with colleagues to the Shati camp, west of Gaza City.

It would be my first time writing about the Nakba, and my first visit to a refugee camp in 13 years, since we had moved from camp life to village life in al-Fukhari, south of Khan Younis.

When I entered the camp, memories of my childhood in Khan Younis came flooding back: the small, crowded houses, some newly built, others still original structures.

It was nice that the commemoration falls in May, with good weather.

Elderly men and women sat by their doors, just as my grandmother did when I was a child. I used to love sitting with her; she seemed used to open spaces, like her pre-1948 home in Beit Daras.

We sat with elderly women, all over 70. They talked about their homeland, the stability they had in their lands, their simple lives, the food they grew and ate, and the heartbreak of not being able to return.

We met many – from Majdal, Hamama, and al-Jura, all depopulated villages and towns taken over by Israel in 1948. Whenever I met someone from Beit Daras, we’d share memories, and laugh a lot, talking about the maftoul (Palestinian couscous) the town was famous for.

The visit was light-hearted, filled with laughter and nostalgia, despite these people having been forced into camp life after the occupation drove them from their towns in horrific ways.

Ruwaida Amer (right) with a group of her students [Courtesy of Ruwaida Amer]

Displacement

I began to understand those Nakba stories more deeply when my grandfather began to tell me his own story. He became the central character in my Nakba reports every year, until his death in 2021.

He estimated he was about 15 years old at the time. He was already married to my grandmother, and they had a child.

He would describe the scenes as I sat in awe, asking myself: How could the world have stood by silently?

My grandfather told me they had a good life, working their farm, eating from their crops. Each town had a specialty, and they exchanged produce.

Theirs was a simple cuisine, with lots of lentils and bread made from wheat they ground in stone mills. Until that dreadful displacement.

He said the Zionist militias forced them to leave, ordering them to go to nearby Gaza.

My grandfather said he shut the door to his home, took my grandmother and their son – just a few months old – and started walking. Israeli planes hovered overhead, firing at people as if to drive them to move faster.

The baby – my uncle – didn’t survive the journey. My grandfather never wanted to go into the details, he would only say that their son died from the conditions as they fled.

After hours of walking, they reached Khan Younis and, with nowhere else to go, he pitched a tent. Eventually, UNRWA was set up and gave him a home, the one I remember from my childhood. It was so old; I spent years visiting them in that asbestos-roofed house with its aged walls.

That memory of being forced into exile became their wound. Yet, the idea of return, the right to go home, was passed down through generations.

A collage of photos of Ruwaida on filmmaking projects
Ruwaida Amer became a journalist, allowing her to document the stories of Palestinians [Courtesy of Ruwaida Amer]

Memories made flesh, blood, and anguish

The Nakba was a memory passed down from the elderly to the young.

But in the war that Israel began waging on Gaza on October 7, 2023, we lived the Nakba.

We were forcibly displaced under threat of weapons and air strikes. We saw our loved ones arrested before our eyes and tortured in prisons. We lived in tents and searched everywhere for basic provisions to save our children.

My grandfather told me they fled under threat of weapons and planes – so did we.

He said they searched for flour, food, and water while trying to protect their children – so are we, right now in the 21st century.

Perhaps in 1948, the media was more primitive. But now, the world watches what’s happening in Gaza in many formats – written, visual, and audio – and yet, nothing has changed.

Never did I imagine I’d live through an existential war – a war that threatens my very presence on my land, just as my grandparents lived through.

The repeated scenes of displacement are so painful. They’re a cycle, one that we have been cursed to live through as Palestinians again and again.

Will history record this as Nakba 2023?

Years from now, will we speak of this Nakba just as we’ve spoken about the original one for 77 years? Will we tell stories, hold commemorations, and hold close memories of the dream of return that has stayed with us since childhood?

Since I realised what it meant to be called a refugee and learned I had a homeland, I’ve been dreaming of returning.

This pain, we can never forget it. I still remember the camp and my life there.

I’ll never forget the moment Israel destroyed my house and made us homeless for two years, 24 years ago.

Now we live our painful days searching for safety, fighting to survive.

We will tell future generations about this war, the war of existence.

We resist hunger, fear, thirst, and pain so we can remain on this land.

Rashford’s £40m transfer belief

Getty Images
  • 1041 Comments

Marcus Rashford believes Manchester United would be prepared to sell him for £40m to anyone this summer, not just Aston Villa.

The 27-year-old joined Villa in February in a loan deal that included a £40m option-to-buy clause.

The clause does not prevent any other club signing the forward, whose short-term contract with Villa expires on 30 June.

Manager Unai Emery has confirmed Rashford will not play for Villa again this season as he has yet to recover from the hamstring injury he suffered in the build-up to last month’s FA Cup semi-final defeat by Crystal Palace.

While Rashford is understood to have enjoyed his time working under Emery and had a significant impact on Villa’s run to the Champions League quarter-finals – where they were narrowly beaten by Paris St-Germain – there have been no negotiations over a permanent transfer.

Villa still harbour realistic ambitions of a top-five Premier League finish, which would secure a return to the Champions League next season. It would also put them in a better position to broker a deal, considering sources close to Rashford stress he has no intention of taking a pay cut from his estimated £325,000-a-week salary.

The Rashford camp do not believe United head coach Ruben Amorim wants to restore the player to his squad, while minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe previously spoke about his frustration at some of the team’s high earners not being on the pitch.

It has echoes of 12 months ago, when Jadon Sancho finished the season with Borussia Dortmund following a major public falling-out with then-manager Erik ten Hag.

An uneasy peace was brokered by senior club officials between player and manager that at least allowed Sancho to be part of United’s pre-season preparations, but the England forward was overlooked for the opening Premier League games and eventually joined Chelsea.

It is not yet clear whether Chelsea will pay a £5m fee to send Sancho back to United, rather than pay the agreed £20m-£25m to sign the 25-year-old.

As it stands, sources close to Rashford expect him to return to United for pre-season training in July. United have a match against newly promoted Leeds in Sweden on 19 July before they head to the United States for three games in the Premier League’s summer tournament.

Where could Rashford go – and what about the cost?

The simple truth is if Rashford sticks to his guns over his wages – and his United contract does not run out until 2028 – very few clubs in the world could afford him.

It means United have to offer an incentive to negotiate a sale, through a reduced fee or offering to pay a portion of his wages or both.

United sources previously said Villa would end up covering between 75% and 90% of Rashford’s salary depending on performances.

Villa reportedly turned down a £60m bid for their England forward Ollie Watkins from Arsenal in January and Emery subsequently picked Rashford ahead of Watkins for the club’s biggest games.

Rashford had harboured hopes of a move to Barcelona in January but no deal materialised. Ideally, he would prefer to play for a club who are in the Champions League next season.

It is not clear whether Liverpool or Manchester City would be interested, or whether the player would be prepared to join United’s fiercest rivals.

In addition, it is not certain whether Rashford would be inclined to stay at United should they lose next week’s Europa League final, and with Amorim’s future coming under more severe scrutiny than is currently the case.

Either way, another loan deal rather than a straight transfer cannot be ruled out.

An obvious comparison is Joao Felix, who became the fifth most expensive player in history when he joined Atletico Madrid from Benfica for 126m euros (£113m) in 2019, but then fell out with coach Diego Simeone and spent 18 months on loan, first at Chelsea, then Barcelona.

Portugal forward Felix joined Chelsea permanently for £45m last summer as England midfielder Conor Gallagher went the other way.

Related topics

  • Manchester United
  • Aston Villa
  • Football

Rashford’s £40m transfer hope

Getty Images
  • 429 Comments

Marcus Rashford believes Manchester United would be prepared to sell him for £40m to anyone this summer, not just Aston Villa.

The 27-year-old joined Villa in February in a loan deal that included a £40m option-to-buy clause.

The clause does not prevent any other club signing the forward, whose short-term contract with Villa expires on 30 June.

Manager Unai Emery has confirmed Rashford will not play for the club again this season as he is yet to recover from the hamstring injury he suffered in the build-up to last month’s FA Cup semi-final defeat by Crystal Palace.

While Rashford is understood to have enjoyed his time working under Emery and had a significant impact on Villa’s run to the Champions League quarter-finals – where they were narrowly beaten by Paris St-Germain – there have been no negotiations over a permanent transfer.

Villa still harbour realistic ambitions of a top-five Premier League finish, which would secure a return to the Champions League next season. It would also put them in a better position to broker a deal, considering sources close to Rashford stress he has no intention of taking a pay cut from his estimated £325,000-a-week salary.

The Rashford camp do not believe current United head coach Ruben Amorim wants to restore the player to his squad, while minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has previously spoken about his frustration at some of the team’s highest earners not being on the pitch.

It has echoes of 12 months ago, when Jadon Sancho finished the season with Borussia Dortmund following a major public fall-out with then-manager Erik ten Hag.

While an uneasy peace was brokered by senior club officials between player and manager that at least allowed Sancho to be part of United’s pre-season preparations, the England forward was overlooked for the opening Premier League games and eventually joined Chelsea. It is not yet clear whether Chelsea will pay a £5m fee to send Sancho back to United, rather than pay the agreed £20m-£25m for the 25-year-old.

As it stands, sources close to Rashford expect him to return to United for pre-season training in July. United have a match against newly promoted Leeds in Sweden on 19 July before they head to the United States for three games in the Premier League’s summer tournament.

Where could Rashford go – and what about the cost?

The simple truth is if Rashford sticks to his guns over his wages – and his United contract does not run out until 2028, very few clubs in the world could afford him.

It means United have to offer an incentive to negotiate a sale, through a reduced fee or offering to pay a portion of his wages or both.

United sources previously said Villa would end up covering between 75% and 90% of Rashford’s salary depending on performances.

Villa reportedly turned down a £60m bid for their England forward Ollie Watkins from Arsenal in January and Emery subsequently picked Rashford ahead of Watkins for the club’s biggest games.

Rashford had harboured hopes of a move to Barcelona in January but no deal materialised. Ideally, he would prefer to play for a club who are in the Champions League next season. It is not clear whether Liverpool or Manchester City would be interested, or whether the player would be prepared to join United’s fiercest rivals.

In addition, it is not certain whether Rashford would be inclined to stay at United should they lose next week’s Europa League final, and with Amorim’s future coming under more severe scrutiny than is currently the case.

Either way, another loan deal rather than a straight transfer cannot be ruled out.

An obvious comparison is Joao Felix, who became the fifth most expensive player in history when he joined Atletico Madrid from Benfica for 126m euros (£113m) in 2019, but then fell out with coach Diego Simeone and spent 18 months on loan, first at Chelsea, then Barcelona.

Portugal forward Felix joined Chelsea permanently for £45m last summer as England midfielder Conor Gallagher went the other way.

Related topics

  • Manchester United
  • Aston Villa
  • Football

Championship becomes Champ Rugby in overhaul

Getty Images
  • 42 Comments

The Championship will be rebranded Champ Rugby from next season in an overhaul of English rugby union’s second tier.

It will feature 14 teams, with the division’s top six at the end of the season entering play-offs to decide the title.

The champions will then have the opportunity to earn promotion to the Premiership, via a play-off against the top tier’s bottom side.

There will be automatic relegation to third-tier National 1 for the 14th-placed Champ Rugby side.

The 12th and 13th-placed side will also meet in a one-off game, with the losers playing National 1’s runners-up for the final place in the second tier.

Richmond, National 1 champions in 2024-25, and Worcester, who have been resurrected after going bust in 2022, will join the league in 2025-26 to make it up to 14.

The announcement follows work done by the Tier 2 Board, chaired by Simon Gillham, who is vice-president of French Pro D2 side Brive.

Gillam stressed throughout the Champ Rugby launch briefing that “aspiration and jeopardy” were at the centre of the new format.

The Rugby Football Union hopes that Champ Rugby will become a stronger piece of its player pathway, and help to develop the next Henry Pollock, who spent some of last season with Bedford Blues.

The league has new branding and a promotional video that comes with the strap line “Welcome to the proving ground”.

Henry Pollock playing for BedfordRedHatPhoto

After 26 regular-season games, the sides finishing in third to sixth will play quarter-finals. The winners of those games will go into semi-finals against the teams who finished first and second, before a final to crown a Champ Rugby winner.

With no automatic promotion spot, the winner will then enter a two-legged play-off against the Premiership’s bottom side if they meet the top flight’s minimum operating standards.

There was no play-off to be promoted from this season’s 12-strong Championship after champions Ealing Trailfinders failed to meet the standards required to be admitted to the top flight.

Sixth-placed Coventry also fell short, with Doncaster, who finished fifth, being the only club who would have been eligible to play off against Premiership bottom side Newcastle.

Discussions are under way for a title sponsor and there are plans to stream the league’s matches.

RFU funding for Champ Rugby and parachute payments for relegated sides from the Premiership are still to be confirmed, with no timeline given on when this will be decided.

The current Championship clubs saw their central funding cut from around £600,000 a year before the Covid-19 pandemic to about £160,000. This figure will remain the same for the 2025-26 season.

How the plans will work, with the Premiership currently looking at a franchise model, is unclear.

Nick Johnson, chief executive at Coventry, said closing the financial gap between Champ Rugby and the Premiership was “not a quick fix” but added: “We can sit back and whinge or we can get off our backsides and do something about it. That’s what we’re doing.”

“We’ve noticed a step change in how seriously PRL [Premiership Rugby] are taking us because we’ve got our act together and our house in order. We’ve just got to keep doing that.”

To help young players gain experience, Champ clubs will be permitted unlimited dual-registered players from Premiership sides.

However, this will be capped at a maximum six in any matchday squad.

Related topics

  • Rugby Union

Chopra: Nadeem javelin friendship ‘not the same’ after India-Pakistan clash

Doha, Qatar – India’s Olympic gold medal-winning athlete Neeraj Chopra believes the recent escalations between his country and neighbouring Pakistan will affect the hugely popular friendship he shared with his cross-border counterpart Arshad Nadeem.

Both men’s javelin athletes have earned widespread praise for overlooking the decades-old South Asian rivalry with their friendly interactions at international tournaments, but Chopra said on Thursday that his relationship with Nadeem is unlikely to remain the same.

India and Pakistan were involved in a brief but intense military confrontation last week that threatened to erupt into the fifth full-scale war between the two countries.

“It will not be like it was before [the recent escalations],” Chopra told Al Jazeera when asked about the repercussions of the tensions on his friendship with Nadeem.

“I never had a very deep friendship with him, but we were always respectful towards each other,” he added while speaking before the Doha Diamond League, a World Athletics meet scheduled for Friday in Qatar.

The frequent words of encouragement and appreciation exchanged between Chopra, who won Olympic gold at Tokyo 2021, and Nadeem, who bagged gold at Paris 2024, rendered both the darlings of social media and the face of a rare cross-border friendship.

However, following the April 22 attack that left 26 civilians dead in Pahalgam, in Indian-administered Kashmir, Chopra faced intense social media backlash for inviting Nadeem to the May 24 Neeraj Chopra Classic javelin event in India.

The invitation was extended before the attack and was declined by Nadeem, citing his preparations for the May 27-31 Asian Athletics Championship in South Korea.

Chopra’s eponymous event was eventually postponed in the wake of the cross-border conflict, but not before the 27-year-old Indian athlete released a statement on April 25, saying Nadeem’s participation at the meet was “completely out of the question” following the Pahalgam attack.

On May 7, India launched multiple missile attacks on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the Pakistani military claimed to have shot down multiple Indian air force planes.

Three days later, Pakistan retaliated with a missile attack on Indian airbases. Both countries were on the precipice of war before a United States-brokered ceasefire was agreed.

Amid the war-like scenario, both Chopra and Nadeem took to social media to pledge their support for their respective armed forces.

It was in stark contrast to the warmth shared by the world’s top javelin throwers, who often posed together for photographs at athletics events and shared greetings on social media.

Chopra and Nadeem were gold and silver medallists at the World Athletics Championships in 2023 and celebrated together as the Indian asked his Pakistani opponent to join him for a photo and stood close with their arms around each other.

When Nadeem became the first Pakistani track and field athlete to win a gold medal at the Paris Olympics, Chopra’s mother won hearts across the border when she said Nadeem was also like a “son” to her.

It is unclear when the athletes will compete against each other, as Nadeem is not participating at the Doha Diamond League and Chopra is set to skip the Asian Athletics Championships in South Korea.

Despite the fallout of the recent political and military standoff, Chopra said he will continue to maintain a respectful demeanour towards Nadeem.

“I have a lot of friends in the athletics circuit since javelin throwers are a very small community,” Chopra said.

“I will always reciprocate the respect I receive from my fellow athletes.”

Nadeem, left, is congratulated on his gold medal and Olympic record performance in the Men’s Javelin Throw Final by silver medal winner Chopra during the Paris 2024 Summer Olympic Games [File: Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images]

Strictly’s Chris McCausland issues three-word warning to Dianne Buswell after BAFTA win

Strictly Come Dancing winner Chris McCausland told dance partner Dianne Buswell that “we’ll fall out” after the pair recently won a BAFTA

Chris was unable to attend the awards ceremony after previously agreeing to a stand-up gig(Image: PA)

Strictly Come Dancing champion Chris McCausland has playfully warned his dance partner Dianne Buswell “we’ll fall out” following their recent BAFTA triumph.

The pair, who defied expectations to reach the Strictly final last year, clinched the coveted Glitterball trophy after edging out rivals Tasha Ghouri and Aljaž Škorjanec in December’s showdown.

Their unforgettable Waltz to a poignant version of You’ll Never Walk Alone last autumn not only captured the hearts of the nation but also secured them the title for the most Memorable Moment at the BAFTA TV Awards on May 11, an accolade uniquely determined by public vote.

During one of their first conversations post-BAFTA win on their podcast Winning Isn’t Everything, Dianne mentioned that all BAFTA victors get one of the famous statuettes, prompting Chris to interrupt, saying: “When you say everyone, do I get one?”

Despite Chris being unable to attend the ceremony due to prior engagements, it was Dianne who ultimately brought the prestigious award home, having accepted it solo on the night, reports Edinburgh Live.

Chris McCausland and Dianne Buswell
Chris McCausland has told Dianne Buswell after winning a BAFTA recently(Image: BBC/Guy Levy)
Article continues below

As they playfully bantered over who would keep the prize, Chris humorously said: “This could be how we fall out, trying to share this thing” but his partner reassured him that “we need to get in contact with BAFTA team” to sort out an additional trophy for Chris.

Upon receiving the award, an elated Dianne said on stage: “In one minute and 30 seconds of a dance, I feel like this told such a story. A story of hope, determination, resilience and vulnerability, all in that one minute 30.”

She continued: “This moment meant so much to the both of us, so I’m just so thrilled that we have this.”

Dianne Buswell
Dianne collected the BAFTA for the most Memorable Moment(Image: BAFTA via Getty Images)

While performing onstage in Warrington during his latest comedy tour, Chris shared the exciting news with his audience announcing: “Me and Dianne only went and won a BAFTA today! I’m very proud of Dianne – her speech was amazing.”

Chris added: “I’m in Warrington – I’ve had two shows here today and these are shows that I cancelled to do Strictly in the first place so I couldn’t exactly cancel them a second time just to go to the BAFTAs, could I?”

Article continues below