Archive May 30, 2025

Current Security Landscape Reflects Significant Improvements – CNG

The current security situation in Nigeria, according to the Coalition of Northern Groups (CNG), demonstrates significant improvements that demonstrate the effectiveness of government measures to address the country’s security challenges.

The group expressed regret at a press conference in Abuja over planned conflicts between Christians and Muslims in Northern Nigeria.

This alarming development, according to Comrade Jamilu Charanchi, the country’s national coordinator, not only threatens the region’s shared values but also poses a significant threat to regional stability and peace.

The group claimed that recent publications have raised concerns about the escalating violence in communities despite contradictory reports from some international human rights organizations, particularly Amnesty International.

According to them, over 10, 217 people have died in the past two years since the current government took office, with 6 896 fatalities in Benue State alone and 2630 in Plateau State. We must convey our deep concern about the lack of transparency in these figures, the organization stated in an Amnesty International report from recent days.

The international rights organization, according to the CNG, allegedly lacked reliable sources for their statistics, leading the northern group to believe that Amnesty may have purposefully inflated the number of Christians who are the region’s primary victims.

The group responded, “

Amnesty International’s attempts to rewrite historical accounts of the notable accomplishments of the Federal Government in tackling insecurity are regrettable.

Recognizing these accomplishments is essential, in the CNG’s opinion, for a balanced understanding of the ongoing efforts to improve national security and foster public trust in governmental initiatives.

They emphasized:

Despite their religious beliefs, the Coalition of Northern Groups argued that such falsehoods are a disservice to the truth and a retaliation for the dignity of all Nigerians.

The group claims that a member of the United States cannot ignore the accusations made against a number of foreign organizations. Congress, who claimed that some international organizations played a role in funding Boko Haram and other insurgent organizations.

The CNG believes that this raises important questions about the motivations behind some of the reports that these organizations regularly publish.

In light of this development, the CNG urged the Federal Government to be decisive in its response.

The group responded, “

CNG urged all African nations to critically evaluate the activities of international human rights and relief organizations within their borders through its spokesman.

The group asked leaders of African nations to suspend these organizations’ activities until they made the recommendation to take proactive steps to respect local contexts and frameworks. According to the CNG, this will safeguard national interests and foster a culture of cooperation without impairing sovereign states’ autonomy and integrity.

The rise of Christian nationalism under Trump

Christian nationalism’s growing influence on US politics is discussed in Marc Lamont Hill’s conversation with professor Anthea Butler.

Under US President Donald Trump, Christian nationalism has gained a significant following.

The movement’s influence on US policy, both domestically and abroad, is growing, leading to growing concern.

What does this mean for American democracy’s future? How does the US response to the Gaza war change as a result of Christian Zionism?

From students to tech: How US-China ties are sliding despite tariff truce

The latest step in escalating tensions between the world’s two largest economies is US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s salvo against Chinese students, promising to “aggressively revoke” their visas.

Despite a temporary tariff truce reached earlier this month, disagreements between Washington and Beijing persist. Recent disputes relate to higher education, artificial intelligence (AI) chips, and rare earth minerals.

Despite diplomatic efforts, China and the United States’ relations continue to worsen.

What tariffs did the US and China reach a deal on?

After Trump’s administration increased tariffs on Chinese goods earlier this year to 145 percent, with cumulative US duties on some Chinese goods reaching a staggering 245 percent, a US-China trade conflict developed. China retaliated by imposing own 125 percent tariffs on US goods.

After two days of trade talks in Geneva, a deal that was reached on May 12 resulted in a 90-day reduction in tariffs on both sides, with negotiators hoping to reach a longer-term agreement. Beijing has a 10% levy on US products while the US has for the time being a 30% tariff on all of its Chinese goods.

However, it appears that Washington and Beijing have only engaged in limited conversation in the weeks following the temporary reprieve.

US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping may need to be called back on Thursday, according to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who told Fox News. Trade talks between the US and China are “a little stalled,” Bessent said.

In the interim, the Trump administration has placed new, stringent restrictions on Chinese university students’ visas and instructed US businesses to stop selling their advanced chip software to Chinese companies.

Why are Chinese students being targeted by the US?

Rubio made the announcement on Wednesday that the US would “aggressively revoke” Chinese student visas. He also made a pledge to increase the scrutiny of Chinese and Hong Kong new visa applicants.

The Trump administration’s decision to deport people and revoke student visas is a part of its broad-based efforts to advance its hardline immigration policy.

China is the second-largest country of origin for foreign students studying in the US, behind India. In the US during the academic year 2023-2024, there were more than 270, 000 Chinese students overall, accounting for roughly a quarter of all foreign students.

The decision to revoke visas was criticized by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who claimed it had “damaged” Chinese students’ rights. According to Mao Ning, a spokesman for the US, “the US has unreasonably suspended Chinese students’ visas under the pretext of ideology and national rights.”

On May 22, the Trump administration ordered Harvard University to stop accepting international students, accusing the school of “coordination with the Chinese Communist Party.” A US federal judge has since blocked that action.

The majority of foreign students at Harvard, or almost 1,300, are Chinese, and many senior officials, including current leader Xi Jinping, have sent their kids there as well.

How are Chinese semiconductors being targeted by the US?

The US Commerce Department issued a warning to American companies on May 13 that Huawei’s Ascend AI semiconductor chips were likely developed or produced in violation of US export controls, shortly after the talks in Geneva. &nbsp,

The Trump administration’s latest effort to stymie China’s ability to create cutting-edge AI chips was the latest. The US and China have long been at odds with the tiny semiconductors that power AI systems.

A representative for China’s Commerce Ministry refrained from criticizing the guidance last week, accusing Washington of “undermining” the Geneva consensus and calling the measures “typical unilateral bullying and protectionism.”

The US government then stepped up the conflict on May 28 by enforcing a law mandating US companies that sell their products and services to Chinese companies, according to The Financial Times.

The US Commerce Department issued letters to companies that manufacture design automation software, including Cadence, Synopsys, and Siemens EDA, to advise them to stop using their technology in China.

Why are Chinese semiconductors being targeted by the US?

For more than ten years, the US has placed stricter restrictions on semiconductor exports, arguing that China has improved military hardware and software through US computer chips.

Chinese government officials and business leaders refute this and claim that the US is attempting to halt China’s growth.

Trump forbade China’s Huawei from using cutting-edge US circuit boards in his first term as president.

Huawei is seen as a market leader for US semiconductor company Nvidia, which produces its own-brand “Ascend” AI chips under the name of “Ascend.” Washington imposed a ban on Nvidia’s AI chips’ exports to China in April.

However, Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, recently warned that export controls had largely failed in China’s AI technology.

How might US policies impact China?

Supply shortages for the aerospace equipment required for China’s commercial aircraft, the C919, a key initiative in China’s effort to become economically and environmentally self-sufficient, will be limited by the sales suspension of semiconductors.

Former CIA China analyst Christopher Johnson claimed that the new export restrictions this week “underlined the innate fragility of the Geneva agreement.”

The risk of a ceasefire breaking even within the 90-day pause is omnipresent, he added. “With both sides wanting to keep and continue demonstrating the potency of their respective chokehold capabilities, we must keep trying.”

Will China stifle exports of rare earth minerals?

According to US officials, China should ease its export restrictions on rare earth elements as a result of the Geneva discussions. However, that hasn’t shown much to the contrary so far.

A wide range of products are produced using rare earth minerals, which are a group of precious minerals that are needed for the defense, healthcare, and technology industries.

The production of capacitors, which are electrical components that power AI servers and smartphones, is also a key priority for rare earth metals like scandium and yttrium.

In April, China implemented export controls in response to Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, which sparked concern among US businesses.

For instance, Ford temporarily shut down a factory in Chicago last week because one of its suppliers ran out of a specialized rare earth magnet.

These high-tech magnets are used in parts like the brake and steering systems, power seats, and fuel injectors in most new cars, especially elevate vehicles (cars that have robotic technology that allow them to “climb” over obstacles).

Women are ‘worthy’ but all-male French Open night sessions continue

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Amelie Mauresmo, the director of the French Open tournament, has refuted claims that the tournament’s night session’s lack of women’s matches suggests that they are not “worthy” of the position.

All six of Roland Garros’ initial six-night sessions were men’s singles matches.

Ons Jabeur, a two-time Wimbledon champion, stated in a press conference earlier this week that the decision has an impact on the development of women’s sport.

No women’s players, according to Mauresmo, a former WTA world number one, have directly complained to her about the situation.

When questioned if she understood that some women didn’t feel “not worthy” of their matches, Mauresmo responded, “That’s not what we’re saying. Right there, I have to stop you.

The conditions have not changed for having one singular match in the evening, as I have always said and I will continue to say, for me.

Paris St-Germain will face Inter Milan in the Champions League final on Saturday night in Munich.

The location was not decided prior to Mauresmo’s news conference on Friday, but it was later revealed that Novak Djokovic’s match against Filip Misolic, who is also a 24-time major champion, will take place.

She claimed that, “The Champions League final won’t change us much.”

“We’re attempting to make the most of the tournament,” he said. Although we are organizing our own event, we are very pleased for PSG.

We want to match the 15 000 people who will be present, so we want to make sure they are the best.

Later on Friday, Jabeur wrote in a passionate post on social media that “honoring one side of the sport shouldn’t mean ignoring the other.”

Your browser won’t allow you to view this X post. Try using a different browser or enabling Javascript. On X, you can find original content.The BBC disclaims all liability for external website content.
Ons Jabeur’s Skip X post

Allow X content, please?

This article contains X’s content. Before anything is loaded, we ask for your consent because they might be using cookies and other technologies. Before accepting, you might want to review X’s cookie and privacy policies. Choose “accept and continue” to view this content.

The BBC disclaims all liability for external website content.

Why hasn’t the format changed for French Open?

Only one singles match is played on Court Philippe Chatrier during the French Open night sessions, which started in 2021.

Since 2023, there hasn’t been a women’s singles match played over three sets in this primetime slot since 2023, making the previous 20 nights’ sessions men’s singles matches that are played over five sets.

Since they were introduced four years ago, the women’s draw has only included four games.

Every year, people ask whether the French Open should do more to promote the women’s game.

Mauresmo claims that the justification for making the decisions is that women’s matches may be going “very quickly.”

She said, “There is nothing new in this book compared to the previous ones.”

We only practice one match per night. It is unchanged. We won’t make any changes to anything.

When you have three sets, at least, two sets can go by a lot.

The women’s level is not currently attained by them. I’m not mentioning this.

Mauresmo added that the tournament does not want to play two nightscapades in the event of late-night matches like the US Open and Australian Open out of fear of putting together a late-night record.

As a result of the schedule’s success, she pointed to the full crowd at Thursday night’s game between French favorite Gael Monfils and British number one Jack Draper, which was played in front of a packed house until it ended at 23:45 local time.

She said, “If we have two matches in the night sessions, it doesn’t work in terms of how late the players will finish.

The stands will be empty for the majority of the first game, so we keep this one game in the evening.

Will anything change?

At Friday’s news conference, Mauresmo expressed frustration with the inquiries regarding the lack of women’s nightclub games.

She quickly shut down another question toward the end of the half-hour event after responding to several others, saying she wanted to “change the subject.”

Mauresmo earlier made an attempt to get past the situation by implying that some women’s matches would be chosen in the upcoming days.

She said, “Maybe we talk about this on the final Sunday.”

Mauresmo hopes that the women’s draw will provide some intriguing nighttime matches.

We have some interesting rivalries, she continued, adding that Iga is “Swiatek,” Coco is “Gauff,” Aryna is Sabolenka, and Madison is “Keys.”

“I believe we are entering a very interesting era with intriguing characters and a very high level of play,” she said.

related subjects

  • Tennis

West Ham fined £120,000 for homophobic chants at Chelsea

Images courtesy of Getty

West Ham admitted homophobic chanting and were fined £120,000 after being found guilty of it during a game against Chelsea.

Following their 3 February premier league defeat at Stamford Bridge against Chelsea, the Hammers were charged with misconduct in March.

A separate regulatory body later acknowledged the charge and determined that the club had violated its supporters’ rights.

The commission determined that the chanting constituted a criminal offense.

West Ham alleged that they “unwaveringly condemn” all forms of offensive behavior and have a zero tolerance policy against discrimination.

related subjects

  • West Ham United
  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

West Ham fined £120,000 for homophobic chants at Chelsea

Images courtesy of Getty

West Ham admitted homophobic chanting and were fined £120,000 after being found guilty of it during a game against Chelsea.

Following their 3 February premier league defeat at Stamford Bridge against Chelsea, the Hammers were charged with misconduct in March.

A separate regulatory body later acknowledged the charge and determined that the club had violated its supporters’ rights.

The commission determined that the chanting constituted a criminal offense.

West Ham alleged that they “unwaveringly condemn” all forms of offensive behavior and have a zero tolerance policy against discrimination.

related subjects

  • West Ham United
  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football