Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Archive April 30, 2025

Suryavanshi, 14, only going to get better – Dravid

BCCI/IPL

Vaibhav Suryavanshi, 14, is “only going to get better,” according to Rahul Dravid, his Rajasthan Royals coach and legend of India. He will also need support in the wake of his newfound fame.

Suryavanshi, the first player to record a 100 in men’s T20s, scored a stunning 35-ball century against the Gujarat Titans on Monday in the Indian Premier League.

How do you handle this, cricket player in this country?

You can’t distance yourself completely, but you also don’t want to get sucked in.

In this circumstance, “finding that happy medium is probably the answer.”

Suryavanshi made his debut against Lucknow Super Giants this month with a deal worth 106 789 (1. 5 crore rupees). He was the youngest player in the IPL when he was signed for a record-breaking price at last year’s auction.

In his third game, he scored 101 from 38 balls with seven fours and 11 sixes, making 34 in his first innings and making 34 in his first.

Sachin Tendulkar, former All-Star Yuvraj Singh, and others have since praised Suryavanshi.

Dravid said, “He’s only going to develop and he’s only going to improve.” He is not a finished article, according to anyone.

No one should be hurriedly proclaiming what he is not. He is who he is.

He’s a very talented young player who is working really hard to improve his abilities and skills, but he’ll need to do so constantly.

Suryavanshi, who was acquired by the Royals last year, became the youngest player to be acquired at an IPL auction.

In a youth test against Australia Under-19s in Chennai, a 13-year-old Suryavanshi scored a 58-ball century for India Under-19s.

He “has a really good hand, bat speed, and obviously, a really high backlift,” Dravid said.

He exhibits good hand-eye coordination when judging length. That’s something that really surprised me.

related subjects

  • Franchise Cricket
  • Cricket

Paul McCartney gives three-word verdict on Donald Trump and it’s brutal

Paul McCartney, the legendary member of the Beatles, previously tripped in at US President Donald Trump after the veteran singer featured him on his 2018 album, Egypt Station.

Paul McCartney explained that the lyrics to one of his songs were about Trump(Image: NBC, Todd Owyoung/NBC via Getty Images)

Musician Paul McCartney didn’t mince words when he took a swipe at President Donald Trump, with a scathing three-word remark that fans have recently unearthed. The former Beatle and Wings frontman didn’t have many nice things to say about the President of the United States, expressing his irritation towards the politician.

McCartney even wrote a song about the then-president for his 2018 album, Egypt Station. McCartney aired his opinions on Trump while discussing his album in 2018, including referring to him as a “braggart.”

The current commander-in-chief, who has recently admitted he didn’t know where the Congo was located, was best described in a three-word phrase.

In his 2018 song, “Despite Repeated Warnings,” McCartney revealed that climate change and Trump’s alleged indifference served as inspiration for the “existential threat” that the artist poses.

McCartney compared Trump to the “not the smartest” leader the world has ever seen when he explained the lyrics.

Continue reading the article.

The lyrics to the song include the phrase “The captain won’t be listening to what is said, and those who shout the loudest may not always be the smartest.”

The Liverpool legend said in the book, “We’re facing the political situation, especially in the US, where a braggart has been in charge and seems quite unstable, to say the least. He may be the loudest, but he might not be the smartest.

McCartney then claimed that Trump thought climate change was “a hoax” and that “nobody is doing anything” to stop global warming’s dangers.

He continued, “I frequently think, “How can someone get away with some of his statements?” However, two days later, the news cycle will have revealed something else he’s said, and it’s difficult to find the information back.

Paul McCartney
Sir Paul McCartney didn’t hold back on his feelings (Image: Getty Images)

In a chat with BBC, McCartney explained his viewpoint : “[The song] basically says, ‘occasionally, we’ve got a mad captain sailing this boat we’re all on and he is just going to take us to the iceberg [despite] being warned it’s not a cool idea’.”

McCartney responded, “Well, obviously it’s Trump,” when asked for specifics. There are many of them, so I don’t get too involved. Not just any one, either.

Trump admitted at the beginning of his political career that he thought climate change was a “hoax” being carried out by the Chinese. In 2012, he infamously tweeted that “the idea of global warming was created by and for the Chinese to make American manufacturing non-competitive.”

Trump’s administration recently removed hundreds of scientists from a government report on how global warming affects the United States.

President Trump
McCartney confirmed that the song was about President Trump among others(Image: Getty Images)

There may not be a formal US government report examining climate change in the country for the first time since 2000, as suggested by the dismissal of numerous professionals.

We are now releasing all current assessment participants from their positions, according to an email sent to those responsible for producing the report. There might be opportunities to contribute or be engaged as the assessment plans develop. I appreciate your assistance.

The public has praised Sir Paul McCartney’s outcry against climate change, and his song, which addresses Trump’s position on the subject, is also hailed as one of his masterpieces.

One fan said, “One of my favorite off of Egypt Station is Despite Repeated Warnings.” “A fantastic album from beginning to end.” Another once said, “I swear, keeps repeating.”

Paul McCartney in Wings
Paul McCartney in Wings(Image: Michael Putland, Getty Images)

Another fan eluded the track after discovering it, saying, “Just stumbled here and listened to the song. blown out. My anthem will be indefinitely this way.

In his book, The Lyrics: 1956 to the Present, McCartney provides insights into his opinion of the Trump administration.

Some people, however, think McCartney should have been harsher in his analysis of the political climate in America.

Continue reading the article.

One claimed that Paul McCartney’s statements about underselling it were untrue. Good day, folks. Do it with your whole f**king chest, Sir Paul, if you’re going to speak up.

Who’s Paul to weigh in on politics, another chimed in with a dash of humor. He is beloved by God. He simply writes good songs.

From Gaza to Vietnam, what is the value of a photo?

Samar Abu Elouf, a Palestinian photographer, captured the image Mahmoud Ajjour, Aged Nine, which was published last year for The New York Times, in this month and won the 2025 World Press Photo of the Year award.

Israeli airstrikes on the Gaza Strip, where at least 52, 365 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023, resulted in Ajjour’s death, with both of his arms falling off. Although the boy’s head and armless torso are partially obscured in the award-winning photo, his emptiness is still evident in his eyes.

Ajjour, who recently spoke to Al Jazeera, recalls how he felt when his mother informed him that he had lost his arms: “I started crying. My mental state and I were very depressed. Due to Israel’s criminal blockade of medical supplies and all other supplies essential for human survival, he was then forced to undergo surgery without an anaesthetic, a practice that has always been practiced in Gaza. I screamed loudly because I couldn’t bear the pain. The hallways were filled with my voice.

How will I be able to hug you, the child’s mother asked, according to Abu Elouf.

Abu Elouf’s portrayal of Ajjour captures the cataclysmic suffering Israel has inflicted on the children of the Gaza Strip with the full support of the United States. The UN Children’s Fund reported that some 1, 000 children in Gaza had already lost one or both legs just two months after the genocidal assault began in mid-December 2023.

Fast forward to the present day and the UN’s warning that besieged territory was causing at least 100 children’s deaths or injuries every day. How many pictures do you need to depict a genocide, though, according to legend, a picture is worth a thousand words?

Today, April 30 marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War, another bloody historical occurrence in which the United States played a significant role in the massacre that continues apace in Gaza. Kim Phuc, a nine-year-old girl who was killed in a US-supplied napalm attack outside the South Vietnamese village of Trang Bang in June 1972, also served as the face and body of that conflict.

The now-famous image of Phuc was captured by Vietnamese photographer Nick Ut as she ran naked down the street in the aftermath of the apocalyptic apocalypse, her skin scorched, and her face pictured in agony. The photo, which is sometimes referred to as The Terror of War as “Napalm Girl,” won the 1973 World Press Photo of the Year award.

In an interview with CNN about the photograph’s 50th anniversary in 2022, Phuc recalled the incident: “Unexpectedly, there was the fire everywhere, and my clothes were burned up by the fire. I still remember what I thought. I pondered, “Oh my goodness, I got burned, I’ll be ugly, and people will see me] differently.”

In any remotely civilized world, it should be obvious that any child or adult must endure this, whether physically or psychologically. After being hospitalized for 14 months, Phuc continued to experience excruciating pain, suicidal thoughts, and shame over having her naked and mutilated body exposed for public viewing.

Napalm was only one of many tools in a US-backed toolkit that included human body incineration and other disfigurement techniques to protect the planet from capitalism. The millions of tonnes of ammunition that the US dropped on Vietnam during the war have still left them with the death toll.

Half a century after the end of the war, Agent Orange, a lethal defoliant, was used by the US to swathe vast areas of Vietnam.

The late American author Susan Sontag argued that the purpose of images like those that appeared on the front pages of the world’s newspapers in 1972, including a naked South Vietnamese child sprayed by American soldiers and running down a highway with her arms open, screaming in pain, likely contributed to the public’s disgust with the war than the ten hours of televised barbarities.

Despite Ut’s publication of his photo, US-backed barbarisms in Vietnam continued for three more years. The fact that nearly every image from the Gaza Strip could be labeled The Terror of War just proves that barbarism is still raging at its best.

The desensitizing effect on the public cannot be understated in the current era of social media, where both still images and videos are reduced to flashy visuals for instant consumption, even when it’s talking about nine-year-old children who have both of their arms blown off.

Abu Elouf stated in an Instagram post on April 18: “I always have, and still do, wish to capture the photo that would stop this war, – that would stop the killing, the death, the starvation.”

What is the value of a photo, she continued, “But if our photos can’t stop all this tragedy and horror, then what’s the point? What image do you need to see to understand what’s happening in Gaza?

What, in the end, is the worth of an opinion article, on that depressing note?