News

Who is Reza Pahlavi? The exiled prince urging Iranians to ‘seize cities’

For decades, Reza Pahlavi was the polite face of the Iranian opposition in exile – a former fighter pilot who spoke of nonviolent resistance and secular democracy from his home in the United States.

But this weekend, the tone of the 65-year-old heir to the Peacock Throne and son of Iran’s last shah changed dramatically.

In a direct challenge to the Iranian government, Pahlavi called on Iranians to “seize city centres” and prepare for his imminent return, prompting what Iranian state media described as “armed terrorist attacks” across the country.

“Our goal is no longer merely to come into the streets,” Pahlavi declared in a statement released on his X account. “The goal is to prepare to seize city centres and hold them.”

From heir to exile

Born in Tehran on October 31, 1960, Pahlavi was officially named crown prince at the age of seven. His path seemed destined for the throne until the 1979 revolution upended the region.

At 17, he left Iran for fighter pilot training in the US at Reese Air Force Base in Texas. While he was away, the monarchy collapsed, and the current political system was established, barring his return.

Pahlavi completed his training and later earned a degree in political science from the University of Southern California. During the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, he famously volunteered to serve as a fighter pilot for his country but was rejected by the authorities in Tehran.

He has lived in exile ever since, residing in the US with his wife, Yasmine Pahlavi, and their three daughters.

‘Preparing to return’

For more than 40 years, Pahlavi advocated for a referendum and nonviolent change. However, his rhetoric has sharpened significantly in recent days.

On Saturday, he urged workers in key sectors — transport, oil, and gas — to launch nationwide strikes to “cut off the financial lifelines” of the state. He specifically called on the “youth of the Immortal Guard” — the erstwhile imperial forces — and security forces to defect.

“I, too, am preparing to return to the homeland so that at the time of our national revolution’s victory, I can be beside you,” he stated.

His call to action comes amid reports of the largest antigovernment protests in years. Pahlavi asked supporters to hoist the pre-1979 “Lion and Sun” flag, a symbol of his father’s rule, and to occupy public spaces starting from 6pm local time (14:30 GMT).

‘Terrorist’ accusations

The response from Tehran has been furious. On Sunday, state-affiliated media outlets labelled the protests as a “new phase of insecurity” and an “internal armed war”.

A report by the conservative Vatan-e Emrooz newspaper, cited by the Tasnim news agency, described Pahlavi’s call as cover for “terrorist nuclei” to attack police and Basij forces.

“Do not be mistaken; this is not merely a riot … these were armed terrorist attacks,” the report stated, claiming that dozens of security personnel had been killed.

Officials have linked Pahlavi’s escalation to foreign interference, specifically accusing the US and Israel. They claimed the unrest is a “Plan B” by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the conclusion of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran in May last year.

‘Opposition against the opposition’?

While Pahlavi has found renewed popularity on the streets, he faces sharp criticism from within the fractured Iranian opposition.

Alireza Nader, an Iran expert, argued in a recent article that Pahlavi’s political activities have become divisive. Critics accuse his circle of attacking other prominent dissidents, such as Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, labelling them “leftists” or “terrorists”.

“Pahlavi has doubled down on his advisors despite others’ unease about them,” Nader wrote, questioning whether the prince has become “the opposition against the opposition”.

There are also concerns about manipulation. Nader noted that Pahlavi’s online support is partly driven by cyber-armies linked to the Iranian government, designed to sow discord, raising questions about “who is co-opting whom”.

Despite these internal rifts, Pahlavi remains the most visible figurehead for the current wave of unrest. With the Trump administration maintaining a hands-off approach — asserting it is “up to Iranians to choose their own leaders” — and the streets of Tehran burning, the exiled prince appears to be making his final gamble for the throne he lost 47 years ago.

All the Golden Globes 2026 Winners: from Adolescence to Hamnet

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36535425.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/1_MIRROR-SPLIT-MAIN-DROP.jpg

Awards season kicked off with The Golden Globes in Los Angeles on Sunday night, celebrating the best in film and television over the past year

Awards season kicked off with The Golden Globes in Los Angeles on Sunday night, celebrating the best in film and television over the past year.

Nikki Glaser returned to host the ceremony on Sunday, and unsurprisingly delivered a string of tongue-in-cheek jokes aimed at some of the celebrities in the room.

Warrington teen Owen Cooper made Golden Globes history by becoming the youngest winner in the ceremony’s history after landing Best Supporting Male Actor – Television for Netflix’s Adolescence at just 16 years old.

Meanwhile, Jessie Buckley scooped the award for Best Actress (drama) thanks to her performance in Hamnet while Timothée Chalamet beat Leonardo DiCaprio to scoop the award for Best actor (musical or comedy) for his role in Marty Supreme.

Here is the full list of winners and nominees.

READ MORE: Timothée Chalamet thanks Kylie Jenner in Golden Globes speech after Best Actor win

Film categories

Best film – drama

WINNER: Hamnet

Frankenstein

It Was Just an Accident

The Secret Agent

Sentimental Value

Sinners

Best film – musical or comedy

WINNER: One Battle After Another

Blue Moon

Bugonia

Marty Supreme

No Other Choice

Nouvelle Vague

Best non-English language film

WINNER: The Secret Agent

It Was Just an Accident

No Other Choice

Sentimental Value

Sirât

The Voice of Hind Rajab

Best animated film

WINNER: KPop Demon Hunters

Arco

Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba Infinity Castle

Elio

Little Amélie or the Character of Rain

Zootopia 2

Best actress – drama

WINNER: Jessie Buckley – Hamnet

Jennifer Lawrence – Die, My Love

Renate Reinsve – Sentimental Value

Julia Roberts – After the Hunt

Tessa Thompson – Hedda

Eva Victor – Sorry, Baby

Best actor – drama

Wagner Moura – The Secret Agent

Joel Edgerton – Train Dreams

Oscar Isaac – Frankenstein

Dwayne Johnson – The Smashing Machine

Michael B Jordan – Sinners

Jeremy Allen White – Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere

Best actress – musical or comedy

WINNER: Rose Byrne (pictured) – If I Had Legs I’d Kick You

Cynthia Erivo – Wicked: For Good

Kate Hudson – Song Sung Blue

Chase Infiniti – One Battle After Another

Amanda Seyfried – The Testament of Ann Lee

Emma Stone – Bugonia

Best actor – musical or comedy

WINNER: Timothée Chalamet – Marty Supreme

George Clooney – Jay Kelly

Leonardo DiCaprio – One Battle After Another

Ethan Hawke – Blue Moon

Lee Byung-Hun – No Other Choice

Jesse Plemons – Bugonia

Best supporting actress

WINNER: Teyana Taylor – One Battle After Another

Emily Blunt – The Smashing Machine

Elle Fanning – Sentimental Value

Ariana Grande – Wicked: For Good

Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas – Sentimental Value

Amy Madigan – Weapons

Best supporting actor

WINNER: Stellan Skarsgård – Sentimental Value

Benicio Del Toro – One Battle After Another

Jacob Elordi – Frankenstein

Paul Mescal – Hamnet

Sean Penn – One Battle After Another

Adam Sandler – Jay Kelly

Cinematic and box office achievement

WINNER: Sinners

Avatar: Fire and Ash

F1

KPop Demon Hunters

Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning

Weapons

Wicked: For Good

Zootopia 2

Best director

WINNER: Paul Thomas Anderson – One Battle After Another

Ryan Coogler – Sinners

Guillermo del Toro – Frankenstein

Jafar Panahi – It Was Just an Accident

Joachim Trier – Sentimental Value

Chloe Zhao – Hamnet

Best screenplay

WINNER: Paul Thomas Anderson – One Battle After Another

Ronald Bronstein, Josh Safdie – Marty Supreme

Ryan Coogler – Sinners

Jafar Panahi – It Was Just an Accident

Eskil Vogt, Joachim Trier – Sentimental Value

Chloé Zhao, Maggie O’Farrell – Hamnet

Best original song

WINNER: Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo, Park Hong Jun, Kim Eun-jae (EJAE), Mark Sonnenblick – KPop Demon Hunters; Golden

Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, Simon Franglen – Avatar: Fire and Ash; Dream as One

Raphael Saadiq, Ludwig Göransson – Sinners; I Lied to You

Stephen Schwartz – Wicked: For Good; No Place Like Home

Stephen Schwartz – Wicked: For Good; The Girl in the Bubble

Nick Cave, Bryce Dessner – Train Dreams; Train Dreams

Best original score

WINNER: Ludwig Göransson – Sinners

Alexandre Desplat – Frankenstein

Jonny Greenwood – One Battle After Another

Kanding Ray – Sirāt

Max Richter – Hamnet

Hans Zimmer – F1

TV categories

Best series – drama

WINNER: The Pitt

The Diplomat

Pluribus

Severance

Slow Horses

The White Lotus

Best series – comedy or musical

WINNER: The Studio

Abbott Elementary

The Bear

Hacks

Nobody Wants This

Only Murders in the Building

Best limited series

WINNER: Adolescence

All Her Fault

The Beast In Me

Black Mirror

Dying for Sex

The Girlfriend

Best actress – drama

WINNER: Rhea Seehorn – Pluribus

Kathy Bates – Matlock

Britt Lower – Severance

Helen Mirren – Mobland

Bella Ramsey – The Last of Us

Keri Russell – The Diplomat

Best actor – drama

WINNER: Noah Wyle (pictured) – The Pitt

Sterling K Brown – Paradise

Diego Luna – Andor

Gary Oldman – Slow Horses

Mark Ruffalo – Task

Adam Scott – Severance

Best actress – comedy or musical

WINNER: Jean Smart – Hacks

Kristen Bell – Nobody Wants This

Ayo Edebiri – The Bear

Selena Gomez – Only Murders in the Building

Natasha Lyonne – Poker Face

Jenna Ortega – Wednesday

Best actor – comedy or musical

WINNER: Seth Rogen – The Studio

Adam Brody – Nobody Wants This

Steve Martin – Only Murders in the Building

Glen Powell – Chad Powers

Martin Short – Only Murders in the Building

Jeremy Allen White – The Bear

Best actress – limited series

WINNER: Michelle Williams – Dying for Sex

Claire Danes – The Beast in Me

Rashida Jones – Black Mirror

Amanda Seyfried – Long Bright River

Sarah Snook – All Her Fault

Robin Wright – The Girlfriend

Best actor – limited series

WINNER: Stephen Graham – Adolescence

Jacob Elordi – The Narrow Road to the Deep North

Paul Giamatti – Black Mirror

Charlie Hunnam – Monster: The Ed Gein Story

Jude Law – Black Rabbit

Matthew Rhys – The Beast in Me

Best supporting actress (television)

WINNER: Erin Doherty – Adolescence

Carrie Coon – The White Lotus

Hannah Einbinder – Hacks

Catherine O’Hara – The Studio

Parker Posey – The White Lotus

Aimee-Lou Wood – The White Lotus

Best supporting actor (television)

WINNER: Owen Cooper – Adolescence

Billy Crudup – The Morning Show

Walton Goggins – The White Lotus

Jason Isaacs – The White Lotus

Tramell Tillman – Severance

Ashley Walters – Adolescence

Best stand-up comedy performance

WINNER: Ricky Gervais – Mortality

Bill Maher – Is Anyone Else Seeing This?

Brett Goldstein – The Second Best Night of Your Life

Kevin Hart – Acting My Age

Kumail Nanjiani – Night Thoughts

Sarah Silverman – Sarah Silverman: PostMortem

And as well as film and TV, there was a new award for podcasts in this year’s line-up.

Best podcast

WINNER: Good Hang with Amy Poehler

Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard

Call Her Daddy

The Mel Robbins Podcast

SmartLess

Up First from NPR

Article continues below

Integration of armed factions remains one of Syria’s biggest challenges

When Syria’s civil conflict ended in December 2024 with the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, hundreds of thousands of citizens were still bearing arms. Throughout the nearly 14 years of war, armed factions proliferated: from the broad spectrum of armed opposition factions in the northwest and the regime’s array of military and militia forces in central and western Syria, to the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in the northeast and a complex network of militias throughout the south, and not to forget the likes of ISIS and al-Qaeda.

In this context, the task of demilitarising society and reunifying the country has posed a truly formidable challenge for Syria’s transitional authority. Indeed, the process of disarming, demobilising, and reintegrating armed groups while simultaneously establishing new armed forces and a reformed security sector stands at the core of Syria’s transitional state building project. Days of heavy conflict between government forces and the SDF in Aleppo this past week highlighted the consequences of a failure to resolve the integration challenge.

As a first step in December 2024, the al-Assad regime’s armed forces were swiftly dissolved and a process of status settlement was initiated, whereby all previous soldiers – both officers and conscripts – could register using their national ID and apply for release to civilian life or to re-enlist in the new army.

Thousands of men chose to undertake this settlement process across the country, to clear their names and start life anew. But thousands of others abstained, especially in the coastal region, where the Alawite minority dominates. While many of those who avoided the process melted back into rural communities, hundreds ended up forming anti-government factions that conducted low-level attacks on government forces, culminating in a huge coordinated campaign on March 6 that killed more than 100 government personnel – triggering a chaotic and brutal week of violence that left more than 1,000 people dead.

In the months since, several thousand former regime personnel have undergone training and joined Syria’s new security forces across the country. Nevertheless, the fighting persists, due in part to financial support from prominent al-Assad regime figures now in exile in neighbouring Lebanon, as well as in Russia.

That continues to undermine Syria’s ability to heal ties with Lebanon and Russia, but also complicates the geopolitical standing of such countries among the wider region, which has stood squarely behind the new government in Damascus in the hope of transforming Syria into a base of stability and prosperity.

Meanwhile, Syria’s transitional government is also seeking to rebuild the Ministry of Defence (MOD) with an army, navy and air force and the Ministry of Interior (MOI) with provincial public security directorates, and dedicated “counterterrorism”, counternarcotics and cyber forces.

In this transitional phase, the MOD has emerged as the umbrella under which the broad spectrum of opposition armed factions have been folded. While all former opposition groups have technically dissolved, some remain largely in form, constituting the army’s nearly 20 divisions. Those factions with longstanding ties to Turkiye – particularly from the northern Aleppo-based Syrian National Army (SNA) – appear to have benefitted from greater levels of military support and arms supplies than others previously based in Idlib. Some have leaders with controversial pasts, including outstanding international sanctions designations for violent crimes and corruption.

In the earlier phases of Syria’s transition, the MOD was the force tasked with responding to security challenges and with securing territory through checkpoints and local deployments. This was not an effective “post-war” approach to security, and the ministry’s serious shortcomings in terms of discipline, cohesion and command and control gave way to grievous errors of judgement and restraint – most notoriously on the coast in March 2025, but also in Suwayda in July, when MOD forces intervened in bloody clashes between local Druze and Bedouin communities.

Through the second half of 2025, the MOD took a back seat when it came to domestic security and was replaced by the MOI, whose public security forces have assumed responsibility for local security across the country.

Unlike the MOD’s divisions, the MOI’s forces are dominated by newly recruited men from across the country. While the MOI’s specialist units remain dominated by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) personnel, the relative lack of previous factional affiliations in the broader public security forces has led to significant improvements in some of the most challenging environments.

In fact, Syria’s coastal region has transformed from being the most consistently dangerous and deadly region of the country in the first half of 2025 to the most stable and least violent region at the end of the year – even with a low-level rebellion continuing. That is almost entirely due to the MOI’s assumption of security responsibility, and a months-long effort to engage and build trust with local communities.

The most strategically significant challenge Syria’s transition faces today is from its unresolved territorial issues in the northeast with the Kurdish-dominated SDF and in the southern Druze-majority governorate of Suwayda. In both regions, armed groups are presenting themselves as alternatives to Damascus’s rule – and both are resulting in persistent tensions and conflict.

While the United States government has worked intensively to facilitate and mediate talks to achieve the SDF’s integration into Syria, those negotiations have yet to bear fruit. With multiple deadlines for such a deal now passed, tensions have been sky-high for weeks.

An SDF drone attack on a checkpoint manned by government forces in eastern rural Aleppo late on January 5 triggered a spiral of hostilities that ended in the expulsion of SDF-linked militia from northwestern districts of Aleppo city by January 10. This latest bout of fighting has dealt a blow to integration talks, but also highlighted the consequences of their failure. The very real prospect of hostilities now spreading to front lines in eastern Aleppo could kill the talks altogether.

In Suwayda, a tense standoff remains after the violence in July that killed more than 1,400 people. Druze militias have united under a “National Guard” that is receiving support from Israel. The dominant role played by former al-Assad regime officers within this formation’s leadership has driven a more than 400 percent rise in drug trafficking towards Jordan, according to data collected by the Syria Weekly media outlet – triggering Jordanian air strikes in late December.

Persistent reports of inter-factional violence within the National Guard and increasing numbers of extrajudicial attacks on Druze figures willing to criticise Suwayda’s new de facto authorities suggest the status quo does not offer stability.

It is in Suwayda where geopolitics have proven to be most acute – with Israel’s backing of Druze authorities presenting a direct challenge not just to Syria’s transition, but to Jordanian security, to regional support for Damascus, and to the desire of US President Donald Trump’s administration to see Syria’s new government assume nationwide control.

The de facto Druze leader in Suwayda, Hikmat al-Hijri, is also in regular contact with SDF leaders in northeast Syria, with both sides appearing at times to be coordinating their positions vis-a-vis Damascus. Alawite figures on the coast, meanwhile, including protest leader Ghazal Ghazal, have also been in communication with both the SDF and al-Hijri in an attempt to unite behind a political vision that stands in opposition to Damascus.

Ultimately, Syria’s process of resolving the challenges of armed factions is intrinsically political and tied both to the civil war and to the tensions and challenges that have emerged out of the transition itself. The fact that a vast majority of the international community has united in support of Syria’s transitional government has helped to provide the time and space for dissolving and integrating armed factions and fighters across the country. However, as long as geopolitical challenges to the transition remain, the process of integration will remain incomplete and continue to be a source of instability.

India’s Kohli becomes second-highest run-scorer in international cricket

India’s Virat Kohli has become the second-highest scorer across all formats of international cricket after his match-winning knock of 93 in the first one-day international (ODI) against New Zealand.

Kohli went past Sri Lanka’s Kumar Sangakkara (28,016 runs) on Sunday to move into second in the list of leading run-scorers in the international game, behind fellow Indian Sachin Tendulkar (34,357).

The top-order batter now has 28,068 runs in Test, ODI and T20 cricket since making his debut for India in an ODI in Sri Lanka in 2008.

“If I look back at my whole journey, then it is nothing short of a dream-come-true for me,” Kohli said after being named Player of the Match in Vadodara.

“I have always known my abilities, but I also knew I had to work extremely hard to get where I am today. God has blessed me with far more than I could ever ask for. I look back at my journey with a lot of grace and gratitude, and I feel really proud of it.”

His 91-ball knock in the ODI opener helped India chase down a victory target of 301 with four wickets and six balls to spare to lead the three-match series 1-0.

But the in-form Kohli missed out on his 54th ODI century after he registered his fifth 50-plus score in as many ODI innings, including two hundreds.

“If I am being brutally honest, the way I’m playing right now, I’m not thinking about milestones at all,” the former captain said.

In his 17th year in international cricket, he continues to reinvent himself. Kohli said he now aims to make the most of the first 20 deliveries ‌after coming in at first drop.

He said he has tweaked his approach of late to counterattack early in his innings and ‍put bowlers under ‍pressure.

After opener Rohit Sharma fell for ‍26 in the ninth over, Kohli refused to retreat into a defensive shell and instead took the initiative to ‍force New Zealand’s ⁠attack onto the back foot.

“If the situation is a bit tricky, I back myself to counterattack now rather than just trying to play the situation in because some ball has your name on it,” he said.

“There’s no point waiting around for too long. But at the same time, you ‌don’t play outrageous shots. You still stick to ⁠your strengths, but you back yourself enough to put the opposition on the back foot,” he said.

The swashbuckling batter believed his approach would have been more aggressive had India not been chasing.

“If we were batting first, I probably would’ve gone harder. But in a chase, with a total on the board, I had to play the situation. I felt like hitting more boundaries, but experience kicks in. The only thing on my mind was getting the team into a position where we could win comfortably.”

“That actually ended up being the ‍difference in the game.”

Called King Kohli for his prolific run-scoring, the 37-year-old now only plays the ODI format after he and fellow stalwart Sharma, 38, retired from T20 and Test cricket.

Are fans being turned off multi-club ownership model?

Getty Images
  • 49 Comments

Most Strasbourg fans thought they had it good from the deal which tied them together with Chelsea.

After all, the BlueCo investment has given the French side a team competitive in Ligue 1 and finished top of the Uefa Conference League table last month.

There has been a £157m revamp of their Stade de la Meinau home, improving facilities and increasing capacity.

Then there is their activity in the transfer market.

Before Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital-owned BlueCo took control in 2023 the club’s total transfer fees paid out per season were £6.1m, £3.9m and £9.5m.

In the following three seasons Strasbourg have spent £52.6m, £53.6m and £96.5m. They were the biggest-spending club in France last summer, outgunning even Paris St-Germain (£89.2m).

Success on the pitch was underpinned by the attacking and exciting football under Liam Rosenior. Until now.

Last week the Englishman left to take charge of Chelsea. Those who were happy to accept success over a loss of autonomy in a multi-club ownership (MCO) structure now know the trade-off.

There is evidence that opinion appears to be changing as fans find out what it means to be the perceived subservient partner.

Strasbourg-based L’Equipe journalist Cyril Olives-Berthet says BlueCo have “shot themselves in the foot”.

“The general opinion is utter shock,” he told BBC Sport. “Even people who thought there was some interesting stuff with BlueCo are shocked.

“BlueCo had a relatively good image around France after last season. That is Rosenior, the players and the style of play.

“The backlash is harsh, in the media and with football fans.”

‘A symbol of everything that is wrong with modern football’

Some Strasbourg supporters have never accepted BlueCo. The club’s ultras stay silent for the first 15 minutes of every match in protest.

For them, Rosenior’s move to Stamford Bridge reinforces their stance.

“The fact Rosenior is jumping on the Chelsea bandwagon is a symbol of everything that is wrong with modern football, and especially with multi-club ownership,” Alexandre, spokesperson for the Strasbourg supporters’ federation, told BBC Sport.

“It is different to legitimate ambition, and we know someone is going to, at some point, leave for a bigger club. No problem with that.

“But leaving your team in the middle of a season, that’s not OK. That’s not a thing you would do.”

Alexandre has long been a strong critic and described Strasbourg as a “Chelsea B team”.

It stings for club president Marc Keller, too. He took the club from financial ruin in the fifth tier of French football in 2012 and back to the top flight before selling to BlueCo.

Keller recently rejected suggestions Strasbourg had become Chelsea’s “feeder club” in an interview with BBC Sport. That came after it was announced star striker and captain Emmanuel Emegha would join Chelsea at the end of this season.

Rosenior taking the same path appears to weaken his argument.

Keller said he wanted to keep him, but denied reports he had threatened to quit himself if Rosenior went to Chelsea.

“Liam’s departure wasn’t planned,” said Keller, a former midfielder at Strasbourg as well as West Ham, Portsmouth and Blackburn.

“I can understand the surprise, even the disappointment, of some of our supporters.

“And do you think I’m happy about it? The situation was neither planned nor desired by anyone at the club. Sometimes, you have to adapt in football.”

Strasbourg striker Emmanuel Emegha with a Chelsea shirt Getty Images

Chelsea and Strasbourg a ‘unique’ collaboration

Half of the Premier League is now in some form of multi-club ownership (MCO). But those clubs are at the top of the food chain and would not have experience of being the poorer relative.

The City Football Group has Manchester City as its core club, and full control of teams in Italy, France, Brazil, Australia, Uruguay and Belgium. It also owns 47% of Girona in Spain.

Red Bull is a majority owner of teams in Germany, Austria, the United States and Brazil, with minority stakes in other clubs, including Leeds United.

These are major football operations, MCO behemoths. Players and managers will move between entities. It is like an employee getting promoted through a multi-national company.

Head coach Jesse Marsch, for instance, went from New York Red Bulls to Salzburg to Leipzig. But never in the middle of a season.

Other MCOs are set up share ideas and enjoy relative growth, such as Tony Bloom’s interest in Brighton, Union Saint-Gilloise, Hearts and Melbourne Victory.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos owns 100% of Nice and Swiss club FC Lausanne-Sport, but only 28.94% of Manchester United. But his decisive influence in football operations at Old Trafford is enough to trigger one of Uefa’s indicators of an MCO.

Chelsea and Strasbourg’s two-club MCO is “unique”, football finance expert Kieran Maguire told BBC Sport.

While most MCOs tend to be football focused, he added BlueCo is more of a hedge-fund strategy. That means bringing in assets that are low value and selling them on high returns.

“Strasbourg are perhaps slightly adrift in the sense they are seen as a holding area of talent that perhaps Chelsea want to bring to the club at a later point,” said Maguire.

“You could argue that’s the case with Rosenior, to get experience at another part of the Chelsea empire.

“BlueCo target younger players, they put them on long-term contracts. The players deliver and the value of the player is locked in.”

    • 27 November 2025
    • 9 December 2025
    • 9 May 2025

How both clubs are linked in the transfer market

Strasbourg now have a football team that appears to be going places and that could not have happened without BlueCo.

It has worked the other way, too, in transfer spending.

Strasbourg twice broke their record fee received in 2025. First Sunderland paid £27.3m to sign academy product Habib Diarra. Then Nottingham Forest spent £30.3m on Dilane Bakwa, giving Strasbourg a £27.1m profit on a player who came from Bordeaux as one of the first BlueCo signings.

BlueCo would argue that without its involvement, these players – who are evidence of its strategic model – would be sold sooner, and for less.

Transfers by market forces are part of the game, as Alexandre alluded to, but the inter-MCO transfers have raised eyebrows.

Eleven players have moved between Chelsea and Strasbourg, with the Ligue 1 club largely benefiting from loans and the arrival of England left-back Ben Chilwell in September.

There are strange cases, though, like Ishe Samuels-Smith, who moved to Chelsea from Everton’s academy in 2023 and has never played a first-team game. In July, the 19-year-old full-back joined Strasbourg, only to return to Chelsea on transfer deadline day in September and immediately be loaned to Swansea City.

Defender Mamadou Sarr was sold to Chelsea in the summer, but made only one appearance as a substitute at the Fifa Club World Cup and is now back at Strasbourg on loan for this season.

Emegha will become the 12th player in July. With 14 Ligue 1 goals last season and seven in 11 in all competitions this campaign, the Dutch forward’s departure is more significant.

Could this mark a shift in opinion?

Strasbourg fans display a message of support to Crystal Palace against multi-club ownershipGetty Images

Strasbourg are finding out that things are not always rosy down the food chain.

They are not the only fans to show their displeasure, either.

For instance, in May 2024 supporters of fellow French club Troyes, part of the City Football Group, protested by throwing flares on to the pitch and getting a match against Valenciennes abandoned.

Troyes had been facing back-to-back relegations to the third tier and were saved only by the bankruptcy of Bordeaux. They are now clear at the top of Ligue 2.

Fans can protest but there appears little football’s authorities can do to roll back on MCOs despite genuine concerns over the integrity of competitions.

Technically Fifa could restrict international transfers between the clubs, but that is not on the table.

Fifa does have jurisdiction within its own competitions. It removed Mexico’s Club Leon from last summer’s Club World Cup due to their association with Pachuca.

Uefa is getting tougher but has the same restrictions. Crystal Palace, Drogheda United and FC DAC 1904 became the first clubs ever to face demotion or removal from a competition this season for being in a multi-club structure.

It just so happened Strasbourg played Palace in the Europa Conference League. The French club’s ultras held up banners in solidarity with the Eagles when the two clubs met in November.

Last season Chelsea and Strasbourg could have been in the same European competition, but BlueCo took steps to be compliant with Uefa’s rules so both would be admitted. In the end that move was not tested, but it may be needed another time.

Uefa is expected to go further but whether it has the power to do anything which would halt MCOs is debatable.

Related topics

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • French Ligue 1
  • Football

More on this story

    • 17 October 2025
    A graphic of Premier League players from every team in the division in 2025-26 season, with the Premier League trophy in front of them.
    • 16 August 2025
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

‘I’ll get goosebumps’ – Barnsley duo out to upset old club Liverpool

Vimal Yoganathan
  • 24 Comments

For Adam Phillips and Vimal Yoganathan, it could be the fulfilment of a lifelong dream when Barnsley take on Liverpool at Anfield on Monday.

The two Tykes midfielders came through the Liverpool academy – with Yoganathan spending seven years on Merseyside and Phillips eight – before they were released.

Alongside some of their other team-mates, like defender Josh Earl, the pair are both Liverpool supporters too.

“I was buzzing [when the draw happened],” Phillips, 27, tells BBC Sport. “I ran upstairs screaming at my missus. I couldn’t believe it, I’m still a massive Liverpool fan.

“I was at the 4-0 [Champions League] win against Barcelona in 2019. If Liverpool are on, I’m zoned in and whenever I can, I’ll go to Anfield to watch them too.

“There’s me, Vimal and a few other Liverpool fans in the side. I’ve got more than 30 tickets for my family and friends. They’ll all be in the away end getting behind the boys.

Adam Phillips and Jordan Henderson of Liverpool in action during a training session at Harvard University in July 2014 Getty Images

For Yoganathan, who turns 20 on Tuesday, there is the opportunity to add Anfield alongside Old Trafford and Wembley as some of the iconic grounds he has played at already.

Last season, Barnsley played Manchester United in the Carabao Cup and the Welshman also played an influential role as Oldham won promotion to League Two via the play-offs at Wembley after he joined them on loan in January.

Earlier this season, he became the first Tamil footballer to score in the EFL when he netted against Doncaster Rovers in League One. Yoganathan’s family hail from Sri Lanka and the teenager grew up in Trelawnyd, a village in North Wales.

“A lot of their players in their career may not even play at one of them so it’s mad that I get to do all three in the space of just over a year,” Yoganathan tells BBC Sport.

Vimal Yoganathan of Oldham Athletic lifts the trophy during the Vanarama National League play-off finalGetty Images

Yoganathan was a ball boy at Anfield in 2018 when Divock Origi scored an injury-time winner against Everton in the Premier League, and “loved watching” Philippe Coutinho when he was in the club’s academy.

As for Phillips, who retired from cycle speedway at 16 after winning British titles, there is a link with Coutinho too.

“I was 16 when I went to America with the first team for a pre-season tour in 2014 under Brendan Rodgers and I got subbed on for Coutinho in one of the games. It was surreal,” he recalls.

“I’d just left school and was training with Steven Gerrard, Luis Suarez and Coutinho.”

Such was the hype around Yoganathan’s signing that Rodgers, the Liverpool boss at the time, was there on the day he joined at the age of eight. The Reds had scouted him when he was six.

“I’ve still got the picture framed up at home with me next to Brendan and my parents,” says Yoganathan.

Yet by 2021, he was looking for another club. That was when Bobby Hassell, the academy manager at Barnsley – who also played in the cup tie at Anfield 18 years ago – gave him an opportunity in South Yorkshire.

“It was tough [getting released],” says Yoganathan. “Any lad who’s been released from a football club knows it’s one of the most devastating experiences, but it’s helped me overcome challenges.

“As a person, it’s helped me become more resilient. Football’s a game of opinions. One person might start you in League One whereas other coaches didn’t want to give me a chance in academy games. I’ve learned to overcome that and become more resilient.”

Yoganathan’s footballing journey has been well documented as a trailblazer for South Asians and the teenager insists it’s all a bit “mad”.

Barnsley players celebrate knocking Liverpool out of the FA Cup in 2008Getty Images

And so to Monday night under the lights against what is expected to be a strong Liverpool side.

Brian Howard, who scored the injury-time winner when the sides last met in 2008, was at Oakwell with the squad earlier in the week.

Barnsley have won at Anfield on their last two visits, with their last defeat at Liverpool coming in 1959.

While 57 places separate the teams, the omens are good for Conor Hourihane’s side. Either way, the conversations have already started in the dressing room about which Liverpool shirt to swap for.

“We’ve had a little bit [of chat],” says Yoganathan. “We don’t know who’s playing but there’s loads of players whose shirts I’d want.

“I’ve liked watching Huge Ekitike and obviously [Virgil] van Dijk would be an amazing one. There’s loads. I’ll take anyone’s shirt and be happy.”

For Phillips though, there is a little bone to pick.

“I went to the same school as Curtis Jones, although he’s a bit younger, so potentially his or Van Dijk’s shirt would be class,” he adds.

“But Curtis unfollowed me on Instagram so he must think he’s big time now. Trent [Alexander-Arnold] still follows me and responds but I’ll have to have a word with Curtis on the pitch.”

Regardless of who follows who on social media and the amount of Liverpool fans in this Barnsley side, the aim is clear – to follow in the footsteps of the Tykes heroes who knocked out the Reds and Chelsea before losing to Cardiff in the FA Cup semi-final 18 years ago.

“We’re aiming for a win,” says Yoganathan.

Related topics

  • Liverpool
  • Barnsley
  • FA Cup
  • Football