Slider1
previous arrow
next arrow

News

LP Petitions IGP Over Alleged Police Complicity In Secretariat ‘Invasion’

The Labour Party has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, over what it described as the complicity of officers of the Nigeria Police Force in the alleged invasion and occupation of its National Secretariat in Utako, Abuja.

In a statement dated February 13, 2026, and signed by its Deputy National Chairman, Ayo Olorunfemi, the party alleged that the FCT Command unlawfully took sides in an ongoing leadership dispute by denying members of the National Working Committee access to their offices while granting entry to a rival faction.

READ ALSO: NNPP Slams U.S. Bill Seeking Visa Ban, Asset Freeze On Kwankwaso

“For the past one year, there has been all manner of threats by some disgruntled elements in the Labour Party to picket, invade and occupy the National Secretariat of the Labour Party in Utako,” the statement read.

The party alleged that the latest incident occurred at about 1:00 a.m. on Tuesday, when “some hoodlums, according to security personnel at the Secretariat, scaled into the party compound to pull down the party’s billboards and replaced them with those of Nenadi Usman.

The faction in question is reportedly led by Nenadi Usman under what the party described as a self-styled National Caretaker Committee.

According to the statement, by dawn on Tuesday, police officers from the Area Command, Life Camp, had barricaded the entrance gate, preventing the National Chairman, Barrister Julius Abure, the National Secretary and other national officers from accessing their offices.

“To our chagrin, police officers from Area Command, Life Camp barricaded the entrance gate and prevented our National Chairman, National Secretary and some other National Officers from entering their offices,” Olorunfemi said.

He further alleged that the officers permitted only certain individuals whose names appeared on a list in their possession to enter the premises, including Ikechukwu Emetu and Usman.

The party claimed that Usman also addressed a press conference at the Secretariat under police protection.

Following the incident, the Labour Party said it met with the FCT Commissioner of Police and was directed to the Area Commander, Life Camp, who reportedly assured them that “the Police must maintain professionalism and neutrality in internal affairs of political parties.”

However, the party expressed dismay that on Wednesday, February 11, a larger contingent of officers allegedly returned to barricade the premises while allowing members of the rival faction to hoist banners of a “so-called Caretaker Chairman.”

“It is not in doubt that there is a certain group calling themselves the National Caretaker Committee led by Senator Nenadi Esther Usman who invaded the office and are bent on causing a breakdown of law and order,” the statement said.

The party argued that if the premises were to be sealed, no faction should have been granted access. “If the office was going to be sealed off temporarily, no group should be allowed access so as not to create the impression of bias on the side of the police,” it stated.

Reacting to allegations made during Usman’s press briefing that the Abure-led executive broke into the Secretariat and removed files, the party dismissed the claims.

“How can she say that their office was invaded when, indeed, the office still belongs to the Abure-led executive? How can any reasonable person be talking about breaking in? Do you break into what you already have?” the statement said.

On reports that hoodlums were arrested at the Secretariat, the party challenged the police to provide evidence.

“We challenge the police to produce the hoodlums that were alleged to have been arrested in the party office,” Olorunfemi said, adding that only three persons were arrested — “one of whom is the FCT State Secretary of the party who lives in the premises and two other boys brewing kunu drinks for their daily living in the office.”

The party also disclosed that it had earlier written to the police on January 25 after receiving intelligence that the office would be invaded. It accused the rival faction of resorting to “self-help” rather than the legal process.

“Ordinarily, when there is a motion for stay of execution, and there is a pending appeal, all parties are supposed to maintainthe status quo. By the Sheriff and Civil Process Act, there are procedures forthe enforcement of judgments. What they did was self-help.”

The party further alleged that there were plans to arrest some of its national officers, including the National Chairman, and called on the Inspector-General of Police to intervene.

“We implore the IGP to use his good offices in directing that the police officers maintain professionalism and neutrality in their current intervention at the Labour Party National Headquarters,” the statement added.

While urging its supporters to remain calm, the party said it was pursuing all lawful avenues to resolve the dispute and defend what it described as its legitimate leadership.

What does BNP’s landslide mean for Bangladesh’s post-uprising order?

Dhaka, Bangladesh – Bangladesh’s February 12 election has delivered a landslide victory for the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which will now form the first elected government since the July 2024 mass uprising that toppled former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League party.

While the election, from which the former governing Awami League was banned, has been viewed as something of a litmus test for political change in Bangladesh, observers say the overwhelming election of the BNP, one of just two parties which have held power continuously since independence in 1971, shows Bangladeshis may prefer to stick with what they know.

On Friday, the Election Commission released unofficial results showing the BNP winning 209 seats out of 297 already announced; Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami with 68; the National Citizen Party (NCP) with six; smaller parties, a handful of seats; and independents with seven seats.

In all, 299 of the 300 elected seats in parliament were up for grabs in this election. Turnout was about 60 percent.

Registered voters also voted in a referendum to approve constitutional reforms, with just more than 60 percent voting “yes” for the July National Charter outlining those reforms.

Final official results are still pending, but Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, BNP’s secretary-general, hailed the sweeping election victory as evidence that the BNP is “a party of the people”. The party expects to form a government on Sunday.

On Friday night, Jamaat-e-Islami, the BNP’s main opponent in this election, had yet to concede defeat, saying it was not “satisfied” with the vote count and raising “serious questions about the integrity of the results process”.

Analysts fear this may signal a return to the confrontational politics of the past in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh election
Polling officials count ballots inside a counting centre during the national election in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on February 12, 2026 [Fatima Tuj Johora/Reuters]

A vote for familiarity, experience

Asif Mohammad Shahan, professor of development studies at Dhaka University, said the result showed most people would rather opt to have a known political group in power at times of uncertainty.

“Voters choosing BNP means they ultimately chose a familiar political force. They appeared to prefer a party whose governing experience they already knew, despite reservations about some of its past practices,” he told Al Jazeera.

Ultimately, the result indicates that the people of Bangladesh have chosen to revert to institutional politics following the turbulence of 2024 rather than embrace any sort of ideological shift as represented by the student-led National Citizen Party, which joined forces with Jamaat to contest this election.

Political historian Mohiuddin Ahmad told Al Jazeera that this election was almost a “repetition of the 2001 election” when the BNP surged in popularity and won 193 parliament seats, ahead of the previously governing Awami League, which secured just 62.

The real litmus test, now, he said, will be to see how well the opposing parties cooperate in the new parliament. “Parliamentary democracy becomes successful through cooperation between the treasury bench and the opposition bench,” he told Al Jazeera.

But can Bangladesh steer away from the confrontational politics of the past?

Bangladesh election
Shafiqur Rahman, leader of Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, attends a news conference following the general election, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on February 12, 2026 [Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters]

Two competing mandates

Political reform is far from off the agenda, however, and this may ultimately be what drags the nation back to those bad old days, experts say.

On Thursday, Bangladesh also held a referendum on the July National Charter, a blueprint for constitutional reforms emerging from the 2024 uprising and aimed at restructuring the state’s governance architecture. It has been overseen by a caretaker government in place since the ousting of Hasina.

The charter proposes a new two-chamber parliament, new procedures for appointing constitutional bodies such as the Election Commission, and strengthening institutional checks to reduce winner-takes-all executive dominance.

It also outlines broader constitutional reforms, including expanded fundamental rights and limits on unilateral constitutional amendments.

With approximately 60 percent voting “yes” to it on Thursday, the referendum creates a parallel reform mandate alongside BNP’s parliamentary majority.

These two mandates may not fully align, Shahan said.

The BNP was sceptical about the July National Charter referendum for months during the transitional government, at times signalling a “no”, until party chief Tarique Rahman publicly endorsed a “yes” vote on January 30 – something the main opposition Jamaat alliance was eager to point out during campaigning.

Therefore, “the BNP’s manifesto, to a large extent, conflicts with the July Charter”, Shahan pointed out.

During campaigning, the BNP pledged to back the implementation of the charter if voters approved it in the referendum. But Ahmad noted that the BNP’s earlier dissent on parts of the charter means the party may not feel obligated to implement every single reform in it.

In particular, the BNP may be opposed to proposals for proportional representation and the new design of an upper house, which, it has argued, could dilute large parliamentary majorities under the current electoral system.

The scale of its election win indicates that the public expects the BNP will uphold its campaign pledges, particularly on corruption and institutional reform. Therefore, any decision not to pursue specific reforms will require public explanation, Ahmed said.

But the sheer size of the BNP’s majority could make it easier to proceed unchallenged by a weak opposition.

“Those who come with a majority naturally have much greater capacity to work on policy implementation and reform,” political analyst Dilara Choudhury said. But such dominance in parliament also means less accountability.

Shahan warned, “There is a serious concern that, based on political costs, we could return to confrontational politics again.”

Bangladesh election
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) chairman Tarique Rahman gestures to supporters during the final day of election campaigning, before the national election, in Jatrabari, Dhaka, Bangladesh, on February 9, 2026 [Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters]

The Awami League factor

The landslide result also reshapes Bangladesh’s party system at a time when the Awami League is absent. Following Hasina’s brutal crackdown on protesters in July 2024, which killed about 1,400 people, the Awami League was banned from standing in this election.

Some observers have criticised this move, saying it would have been more credible to allow voters to reject the party through democratic means by refusing to vote for it.

As Bangladesh politics were previously dominated by the BNP and Awami League, its absence has also created the possibility of an asymmetrical political field dominated, now, by a single major party, analysts say.

The results of this election appear to show that this may be true.

The BNP has limited incentive to facilitate the Awami League’s return to political life, Shahan noted. But he cautioned that a failure to deliver reforms or effective governance could reopen space for the Awami League’s revival if voters become disillusioned with both traditional and reformist actors.

For now, according to Shahan, post-election stability will depend on two factors: whether opposition parties accept the results and participate constructively in parliament, and whether the BNP uses its strong mandate to pursue inclusive reforms rather than majoritarian consolidation.

Bangladesh
Members of July Oikya, a platform of several organisations that took part in the July 2024 revolution, march to the Indian High Commission to demand the extradition of deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and others who fled the country during and after the uprising, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on December 17, 2025 [File: Stringer/Reuters]

A diplomatic balancing act

The landslide result places the BNP at the centre of both domestic restructuring and regional realignment in the wake of the 2024 uprising, said Shahab Enam Khan, geopolitical analyst and professor of international relations at Jahangirnagar University in Dhaka.

This election will have “immediate implications” for the region, he added.

Particularly, Bangladesh’s relationship with India, where Hasina remains in exile, much to the anger of many in Bangladesh who would like to see her extradited to face the death penalty handed to her by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) in Bangladesh in November last year, for ordering her forces to fire on protesters in 2024.

“The Sheikh Hasina factor will always remain … extradition will remain an agenda, but in reality it may not happen given her relationship with political circles in Delhi,” Khan said.

“This will be a government which will receive unprecedented support from all the global powers, including the regional neighbours,” Khan told Al Jazeera. The United States is likely to continue its engagement initiated under the interim administration led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, while China will remain a key partner given its market-oriented approach to Bangladesh, regardless of which party is in power.

As a result, relations with India – warm under Hasina’s rule – could become more transactional. “[Bangladesh’s] foreign policy will be very confident and that will make Bangladesh–India relationship much more transactional … BNP will look forward to much greater cooperation from Delhi based on reciprocity,” he said.

On Pakistan, he noted, “Islamabad will continue to have a good relationship with Dhaka because historically it had a good relationship with both BNP and Jamaat … we will see trade and investment ties improving and possibly some security cooperation.”

But balancing ties with India, China, the United States and Pakistan simultaneously may pose diplomatic challenges.

“Delhi would always be suspicious about Islamabad’s engagement and the US will always have concerns about Beijing’s engagement,” he said.

Ultimately, however, Khan said internal stability for Bangladesh will depend less on geopolitics than on governance.

“Instability can come from many corners – lack of reform delivery, weak economic performance and inflation,” he said. The evolving relationship between BNP and opposition forces, particularly Jamaat, is an unknown variable.

Above all, Bangladeshi politics must not return to the old style of repression over debate.

“If BNP resorts to the same policies that Awami League has … cracking down on the public when it comes to criticism of foreign policy … that will be massively disastrous,” he said, adding that foreign policy toward India and Pakistan “will be heavily monitored by the public”.

Whether the new government embraces a reformed constitutional order or reverts to majoritarian governance will depend on how it balances its parliamentary dominance, the July Charter reform mandate, and rising geopolitical expectations.

Africa Cup of Nations 2027 set for June-July slot

The 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (Afcon) will take place in June and July next year, the Confederation of African Football (Caf) president Patrice Motsepe has announced.

The South African said reports that the tournament, co-hosted by Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, would be delayed or moved were “totally unfounded”.

Doubts have been raised over whether the necessary infrastructure in the three East African countries will be ready in time to stage the finals.

Meanwhile Nicholas Musonye, the chair of Kenya’s local organising committee, told AFP on Thursday that postponing the tournament until 2028 “would be good for Kenya” because the country will be gearing up for a general election in August 2027.

“The Afcon next year in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda is going to be enormously successful,” Motsepe said.

“I am enormously confident. There are always challenges.

“We have to believe in ourselves as Africans and believe in our people. The quality of people we have who lead African football are world class.”

Motsepe was speaking at a news conference after a meeting of Caf’s executive committee in Dar es Salaam on Friday, and an inspection of facilities and infrastructure in the three host nations by officials from the continent’s governing body will run until Tuesday.

Caf made a commitment to host Afcon mid-year from 2019 onwards, but the past three editions have been played in a January-February or December-January slot.

Staging the tournament during the European club season has led to disputes over release dates for players, and Afcon will be held every four years – instead of biennially – from 2028.

The precise dates of the 2027 Afcon will be announced in due course, Motsepe added.

Wafcon still set for Morocco

Elsewhere, Motsepe says Caf “still have an engagement” with Morocco to host the 2026 Women’s Africa Cup of Nations (Wafcon), which is scheduled to kick off on 17 March.

Earlier this month South Africa’s deputy sports minister said her country would step in and stage the finals.

Her comments were later clarified by South African sports minister Gayton McKenzie, who stated that Morocco “remains the officially designated host” of Wafcon 2026.

“Some other countries said ‘Please can we host it?’ but they want to change the date,” Motsepe said.

“We can’t change the date because it is a qualifier for the [2027] Women’s World Cup.”

Related topics

  • Africa Sport
  • Football

Israeli settlers injure dozens of Palestinians in wave of West Bank attacks

Dozens of Palestinians have been injured as Israeli settlers carried out a wave of attacks across the occupied West Bank, destroying olive trees and vandalising property.

At least 54 Palestinians were wounded on Friday morning as settlers attacked several towns and villages under the protection of the Israeli military.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Settlers assaulted Palestinian farmers on their lands near Talfit, a village south of Nablus in the northern West Bank, and Israeli troops fired tear gas and live ammunition at residents who tried to repel the settler attack.

Images from the village showed homes with broken windows and vehicles with smashed windshields as a result of the attack.

Elsewhere in the West Bank, Israeli settlers also destroyed about 300 Palestinian olive trees near the Ramallah-area town of Turmus Aya, the Wafa news agency reported, citing local sources.

Palestinians across the West Bank have faced an intensified surge in Israeli military and settler violence in the shadow of Israel’s genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza.

A shattered window overlooks a street after it was broken when Jewish settlers vandalised vehicles and homes in the Palestinian village of Telfit, south of the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Nablus on February 13, 2026.
A shattered window in the village of Talfit after the settler attack, February 13, 2026 [AFP]

At least 1,054 Palestinians were killed in the West Bank by Israeli troops and settlers between October 7, 2023, and February 5 of this year, according to the latest United Nations figures.

Israel has also forcibly displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians from their homes across the West Bank, refusing to allow them to return in what Human Rights Watch says amounts to war crimes and a crime against humanity.

The Israeli government drew international condemnation this week after it approved plans to extend its authority over more of the West Bank – a move that observers denounced as de facto annexation, in violation of international law.

“If these decisions are implemented, they will undoubtedly accelerate the dispossession of Palestinians and their forcible transfer, and lead to the creation of more illegal Israeli settlements,” UN human rights chief Volker Turk said on Wednesday.

“We are witnessing rapid steps to change permanently the demography of the occupied Palestinian territory, stripping its people of their lands and forcing them to leave,” Turk said in a statement.

Red Bull advantage ‘pretty scary’, says Russell

Andrew Benson

F1 Correspondent
  • 23 Comments

Red Bull’s advantage at the front of the Formula 1 field is “pretty scary,” says Mercedes driver George Russell.

The Briton said that the performance shown by Red Bull this week in the first of two pre-season tests at Bahrain had been a “reality check” for their rivals.

“They’re not just a small step ahead,” the Briton said. “You’re talking in the order of half a second to a second in deployment over the course of a lap.

F1 is introducing its biggest rule change in history this season, with the engines, chassis, tyres and fuel all to a new specification.

Energy management has become a much more central part of the sport as a consequence of engines that have about half their total power output produced by the electrical part of the engine, and a limited battery size.

Rivals say GPS traces of the Red Bull power-unit in Bahrain this week have shown that it can keep deploying its electrical energy for longer than any rival.

Red Bull's Max Verstappen on track during pre-season testing in BahrainGetty Images

Russell said he and his team had noticed Red Bull’s strength from the time they started running at the ‘shakedown’ test in Spain last month.

He said: “The truth is, Red Bull in Barcelona day one hit the ground running and were well ahead of all of their competitors – ourselves, Ferrari and the others.

“Day one here in Bahrain again, they sort of knocked it out of the park. At the moment, they’re very much the team to beat.

“When you get to Melbourne and you’ve got three hours of practice before qualifying, based on what we’ve seen in Barcelona and Bahrain, Red Bull are going to be ahead.”

Red Bull technical director Pierre Wache rejected Mercedes’ claims, which were first voiced by team principal Toto Wolff on Wednesday.

“We are not the benchmark, for sure,” Wache said. “We see clearly the top three teams. Ferrari, Mercedes and McLaren are in front of us, outside, from our analysis, and we are behind.”

    • 18 hours ago

‘You don’t go in the roundabout to the supermarket in first gear’

The second day of testing on Thursday was marked by two of last year’s title contenders, Lando Norris and Max Verstappen, disagreeing over whether the new cars were enjoyable to drive.

Russell said the 2026 cars were “way nicer to drive” in terms of their handling and ride compared with last year’s, but added that the “engines are very complicated”.

He said: “These two tracks, Barcelona and Bahrain, are arguably two of the easiest circuits for the engines. I don’t want to say anything too early before we get to the likes of Melbourne or Jeddah, but it will be much more challenging for the engines and the energy once we get there.”

But he did expand on a point Verstappen made about the new engines demanding unusual driving styles.

These include using much lower gears in corners than would be normal, just to ensure the engine is revving highly so the systems can recover as much energy as possible.

Russell said: “To give an example, here in Bahrain, usually the first corner is a third-gear corner in the previous generation (of car). Now, we’re having to use first gear to keep the engine, the revs very high to keep the turbo spinning.

“This is probably the one thing that is quite annoying and isn’t that intuitive.

“Imagine when you drive to the supermarket in your car and you get to the roundabout and you put it in third gear to drive around the roundabout, but suddenly the person next to you says, ‘put it in first gear’.

“Everything is like, ‘Wwaahh,’ revving. You don’t go in the roundabout to the supermarket in first gear if you’re driving at a sensible speed. This is the same thing.

“The car and the engine is designed to go around this corner in third gear, but because of the turbo and the boost and all of this, you’ve got to keep the engine revs very high, which means you have to take first gear.

“So, the car just isn’t really designed to do that, but we’re working around it.”

He added that because of the critical nature of energy levels for lap time, it was not always the case that driving around a corner in the fastest possible way – which is usually the fundamental part of a racing driver’s job – would lead to the best lap time.

Russell said: “In the past, if you went around the corner quicker or you tried something different and it worked, you know that’s positive and you just carry that forward.

Related topics

  • Formula 1

More on this story

    • 23 hours ago
    Fernando Alonso in the Aston Martin on the second day of pre-season testing in Bahrain
    • 1 day ago
    George Russell in his Mercedes during testing in Bahrain
    • 17 December 2025
    An image of a 2026 Formula 1 car
    • 2 February
    George Russell speaking to Max Verstappen at an FIA-F1 news conference during the 2025 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 10 December 2025
    Arvid Lindblad holds up a number one sign after winnng an F2 race

US and Europe must ‘repair and revive transatlantic ties’: Germany’s Merz

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called on the United States and Europe to “repair and revive transatlantic trust together” during an address at the Munich Security Conference.

Merz began his remarks on Friday at the annual meeting of top global security figures with an appeal for unity, arguing that Washington also benefits from its role in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The statement contrasted remarks by US Vice President JD Vance last year, who used his appearance at the event, just weeks after taking office, to chastise European leaders for their funding commitments to NATO and to criticise the state of democracy on the continent.

“Let me begin with the uncomfortable truth: A rift, a deep divide has opened between Europe and the United States,” Merz said.

“Vice President JD Vance said this a year ago here in Munich. He was right in his description,” Merz said, as he called for a “new transatlantic partnership”.

Referencing Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement, Merz also warned that Europe did not need to move in the same political direction as the US, saying the “culture war of the MAGA movement is not ours”.

Directly appealing to the Trump administration, he added: “In the era of great power rivalry, even the United States will not be powerful enough to go it alone.

“Being a part of NATO is not only Europe’s competitive advantage. It is also the United States’ competitive advantage. So let’s repair and revive transatlantic trust together. Europe is doing its part.”

‘A new era in geopolitics’

It remained unclear how receptive Washington would be to the message after a year of confrontational policies that have roiled traditional European allies.

That has included the increased pressure for more NATO funding, whiplash efforts to end Russia’s war in Ukraine and Trump’s threats to seize Greenland, an autonomous territory of NATO-member Denmark.

The administration has also put renewed emphasis on what it has called Europe’s “civilizational self-confidence and Western identity”, calling on countries on the continent to stem migration, while accusing them of stifling right-wing voices.

Critics have said the messaging has racist undertones.

Leaving for Germany late Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US is “very tightly linked together with Europe”, adding that “most people in this country can trace both, either their cultural or their personal heritage back to Europe. So, we just have to talk about that.

“We live in a new era in geopolitics, and it’s going to require all of us to reexamine what that looks like,” said Rubio, who is set to speak on Friday.

The visit comes as Trump’s Republican Party prepares for the midterm elections in November, which will decide control of the US House of Representatives and Senate.

A slate of recent polls has suggested tanking support for Trump on several domestic issues, including his hardline immigration policy.

Polls have also shown voter disquiet over Trump’s actions abroad, including the US military abduction of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and Trump’s push to take control of Greenland.

A new poll released on Friday suggested seven in 10 US adults disapprove of how Trump is handling the issue of Greenland.

The rate is higher than the overall disapproval of Trump’s foreign policy approach.

‘European nuclear deterrence’

Speaking on Friday, Germany’s Merz also confirmed he was holding talks with French President Emmanuel Macron on “European nuclear deterrence”.

Calls for a so-called European nuclear umbrella have gained new momentum amid the wider US strategic pivot away from Europe.

Under NATO’s existing arrangement, US nuclear weapons stationed in Europe can be deployed by aircraft from allied countries in the event of an emergency. US nuclear bombs are believed to be stored in northern Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and western Germany.

For its part, Germany has been required to renounce the manufacture, possession and control of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons as part of a 1990 agreement on the country’s reunification.

Merz said any new policy would be in line with Berlin’s legal commitments.