Slider1
previous arrow
next arrow

News

Jonathan, Obasanjo, Emir Of Kano, Advocate Youth Leadership For Africa’s Future

Leaders across Nigeria have urged nations to prioritise young individuals for top governance roles, citing their energy, mental sharpness, and capacity to meet the demands of leadership.

They made the call on Thursday at a memorial lecture and leadership conference organised by the Murtala Muhammed Foundation to mark the 50th anniversary of the assassination of the late head of state, General Murtala Muhammed.

Leading the pack was former President Goodluck Jonathan, who called on African nations to prioritise individuals aged 25 to 50 for top governance positions, citing their superior physical strength, mental sharpness, and ability to endure the intense demands of leadership.

He urged a further reduction in age barriers for political office, building on Nigeria’s existing “Not Too Young to Run” reforms.

“The person we are celebrating today was head of state at the age of 38. Obasanjo, when he took over, was also around 38. And when I look across, I see the youth corps, which is a legacy of General Yakubu Gowon at the age of 32. So why do we begin to think that we must be in our 100s before we can rule a country?” Jonathan said.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Appoints Ismail Yusuf As New NAHCON Chairman

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo also spoke at the event, reflecting on leadership succession in Africa.

“The greatest achievement of Murtala was that he created a successor who could go on after him. The failure of all leaders after Murtala, including myself, is that we have not been able to create successors who could continue after us,” Obasanjo said.

On his part, ex-vice president Yemi Osinbajo addressed leadership values and Africa’s growing influence on the global stage.

“If coming of age means perfection, then no continent qualifies. If it means the absence of struggle or problems, then history itself has not come of age. But if coming of age means self-awareness, confidence of purpose, and the capacity to shape one’s destiny, then Africa is no longer emerging; it is in its moment,” he said.

The Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido, emphasised the importance of restoring dignity and pride in Africa.

“We need to ask ourselves as Africans, where have we lost it, and how can we get back that dignity and pride. The day Africans can hold their heads high as we did in 1975 and 1976, as equal human beings with every race and nation, and as a sovereign nation with the same rights as every other nation, that day we will have truly come of age,” he said.

Secretary to the Federation, George Akume, added, “Leadership has nothing to do with physical age but the age of your ideas. Yes, we respect our young people.”

‘Formula E on steroids’ or ‘a lot of fun’? New F1 cars split drivers

Andrew Benson

F1 Correspondent
  • 278 Comments

Max Verstappen says the new cars in Formula 1 this year are “not a lot of fun” and “like Formula E on steroids” – but Lando Norris disagrees.

Four-time world champion Verstappen says the increased demands for energy management with new hybrid engines are “just not Formula 1”.

But Norris – who pipped Verstappen to the 2025 title by two points – argued the new cars were “a lot of fun”, adding: “Any driver can go and find something else to do. It’s not like he has to be here or any driver has to be here.”

The new engines are energy starved because of the way the rules have been structured and require several kinds of recovery to ensure the battery has sufficient levels of charge for optimum lap times.

This is leading to unusual forms of driving, such as not accelerating out of the final corner before a qualifying lap, lifting and coasting to save energy when trying for ultimate performance, and changing down to lower gears in corners for optimum energy harvesting.

Verstappen, whose team have built their own engine for the first time this season, said: “The right word is management. But on the other hand, I also know how much work has been going on in the background. Also from the engine side, for the guys. So it’s not always the nicest thing to say.

“But I also want to be realistic. As a driver, the feeling is not very Formula 1-like. It feels a bit more like Formula E on steroids.

“As a pure driver, I enjoy driving flat out. And at the moment, you cannot drive like that. There’s a lot going on.

“A lot of what you do as a driver, in terms of inputs, has a massive effect on the energy side of things.

    • 5 hours ago

But Norris said: “A lot of fun. I really enjoyed it. Formula 1 changes all the time. Sometimes it’s a bit better to drive, sometimes not as good to drive.

“But we get paid a stupid amount of money to drive so we can’t really complain in the end of the day.

“It’s a challenge, but it’s a good, fun challenge for the engineers and the drivers.

“It’s different. You have to drive it in a different way and understand things differently and manage things differently.

“But I still get to drive cars and travel the world and have a lot of fun, so, no, nothing to complain about.”

Verstappen said his concern was that the new cars were moving away from what would traditionally be expected of an F1 driver.

Verstappen added: “All the good drivers will be able to adapt to it. That’s not the problem, but it’s just the whole way of racing is changing, and I would say less pure.

“I just want normal driving, just how it should be, without having to [think] ‘oh, if I brake a bit longer or less or more, or one gear up or down’, you know, stuff like that, that it so heavily impacts the performance on the straights.”

The all-electric Formula E series has become known for featuring heavy energy management to ensure cars can get to the end of the races without running out of charge.

F1 is not in the same situation. Rather than a single amount of charge that depletes from maximum to empty from the beginning of the race to the end as in Formula E, the batteries in F1 will go from full charge to very low and back again several times a lap.

Red Bull's Max Verstappen during testing in BahrainGetty Images

Senior figures in F1 have cautioned against jumping to conclusions about the new rules at such an early stage when everything about the cars is new.

The biggest regulation change in F1 history has this year seen new rules for chassis, engines, tyres and the introduction of sustainable fuels.

The engines have a near 50-50 split between the internal combustion and electrical parts and have three times as much electrical power as last year with a battery of more or less the same size.

There are ways the rules could have been constructed to ensure energy management was not such a feature, for example by slightly reducing the power of the hybrid element and allowing the engines to use more fuel, or even by allowing recovery of energy from the front axle as well as the rear. But none of those have so far been allowed.

On the chassis side, a straight-line mode has been introduced which reduces drag from the front and rear wings specifically to aid energy recovery. The tyres have been made narrower for the same reasons. And the cars are smaller and lighter and have less grip and downforce.

The cars recover energy in four ways:

Verstappen is considering competing in the Nurburgring 24 Hours at the famous 14-mile long Nordschleife circuit this year in a GT car – a modified road car.

Related topics

  • Formula 1

More on this story

    • 1 day ago
    George Russell in his Mercedes during testing in Bahrain
    • 17 December 2025
    An image of a 2026 Formula 1 car
    • 3 days ago
    The new Cadillac F1 livery on a generic 2026 model
    • 2 February
    George Russell speaking to Max Verstappen at an FIA-F1 news conference during the 2025 Singapore Grand Prix
    • 30 January
    George Russell driving the 2026 Mercedes during Barcelona testing
    • 10 December 2025
    Arvid Lindblad holds up a number one sign after winnng an F2 race

‘Full circle moment’ as Choi, 17, denies Kim historic third gold

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Katie Falkingham

BBC Sport Senior Journalist in Livigno
  • 32 Comments

It felt like the moment the baton was passed on.

Chloe Kim, the greatest women’s halfpipe snowboarder, and Choi Ga-on, the young protege, standing side by side on the podium.

It was expected to be a procession for American Kim to win a third consecutive Winter Olympic gold, a feat no snowboarder has ever achieved. And yet it was 17-year-old Choi on the top step.

The South Korean had defied a brutal fall in her opening run to score 90.25 points on her final attempt, a total 25-year-old Kim could not better.

It was, as Kim told BBC Sport, a “full circle moment”.

The two had met nine years ago, at a test event in Pyeongchang before the 2018 Games in which Kim, then also aged 17, would announce herself on a global stage with her first Olympic gold.

Realising her potential, Kim and her father helped Choi to travel to the United States to train.

Kim’s father, who is from South Korea, was one of the first to embrace Choi and her emotional team after her Olympic gold was confirmed.

“She’s someone I’ve known since she was little,” said Kim.

Olympic gold marks the realisation of Choi’s potential, a name that has been on the lips of many in the snowboard world for some time but is now catapulted into global consciousness.

In 2023, aged just 14, Choi won X Games superpipe gold, breaking Kim’s record as the youngest rider to win the title.

That same year, she won the first World Cup she entered but was later ruled out of the remainder of that season after fracturing her back.

This Olympic season, however, she underlined her ability by winning every World Cup she entered coming into the Games.

She had managed only sixth in qualification on Wednesday as Kim topped the pile with a score of 90.25 – the exact score Choi would win gold with little more than 24 hours later.

But her final looked to be over on her very first run when she hit the icy lip of the pipe and flipped into its centre, lying motionless for some time.

As heavy snow fell, she eventually brushed herself down and later stunned the onlooking crowd with her spellbinding third run, her coach bursting into tears at the realisation of what Choi had achieved.

“It’s the kind of story you only see in dreams, so I’m incredibly happy,” said Choi.

“During the final, mentally it was so tough. But right now I am the happiest.

“My knees are a bit bad, but I feel like I’m overcoming it all with happiness.”

She later said: “After the first run, I actually cried really hard, thinking maybe I should just quit the Olympics here.

For Kim, the build-up to the Games had been far from ideal.

With just one competition under her belt this season, she dislocated her shoulder and sustained a torn labrum in what she described as the “silliest fall” in training in Switzerland last month.

In Livigno she was competing with her shoulder in a brace but showed little sign of it affecting her.

Watched on by Team USA ‘honorary coach’ Snoop Dogg and snowboarding legend Shaun White in Thursday’s final, the eight-time X Games champion had looked set for gold after her opening run scored 88.00, with few coming close.

But Choi’s last score, met by both cheers and gasps of shock from the onlooking crowd, piled the pressure on Kim, only for a fall – one of many in what was a chaotic final – to ensure she would leave an Olympics with silver for the very first time.

Japan’s Mitsuki Ono took bronze with a score of 85.00.

Speaking to BBC Sport, Kim – who will now have surgery on her shoulder – said: “I’m so proud of myself.

“There was a lot of conversation about me [attempting to win a third gold] but honestly I’m just so glad I was able to get here.

“I think this one might mean more than the others. I think I put it all out there.

“In the past, I would take a cautious approach and ride to win, but these days I’ve just wanted to do what felt good and I feel like I really gave it my all.

    • 1 hour ago

Winter Olympics 2026

6-22 February

Watch on iPlayerListen on Sounds

Related topics

  • Winter Sports
  • Winter Olympics

US urges Europe to take the lead on defence in NATO

Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby has called for NATO “partnerships not dependencies”, saying Europe must take primary responsibility for its defence.

The US official was in Brussels to meet with NATO’s defence ministers on Thursday, where he delivered remarks calling for “clear-eyed realism and fundamental adaptation by all”.

Noting that the current approach of the military alliance was “no longer fit for purpose”, he said a new “NATO 3.0” required “much greater efforts by our allies to step up and assume primary responsibility for the conventional defence of Europe”.

Insisting that the US’s reprioritising of its interests was not a retreat from Europe, he said it was an “affirmation of strategic pragmatism and a recognition of our allies’ undeniable ability to step up”.

Colby said the US would continue to provide its extended nuclear deterrent and, “in a more limited and focused fashion”, contribute to NATO’s defence, as well as “train, exercise, and plan alongside our allies”.

“But we will also continue to press, respectfully but firmly and insistently, for a rebalancing of roles and burdens within the Alliance,” he added.

PURL pledges

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said at a news conference on Thursday that the meeting was “one of the most pivotal” that he had been part of.

He said that he believed that the longer term would see the US’s “nuclear umbrella as the ultimate guarantor of our security here in Europe and Canada, but also a strong conventional presence of the US here in Europe.”

He told reporters that NATO states have announced hundreds of millions of dollars in support for the Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL). The initiative supplies Ukraine with US-made equipment and munitions.

Rutte thanked the United Kingdom, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Lithuania for their contributions, and said he expected more pledges soon.

“The good news is that the billions are coming in,” he said.

On Wednesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called for more protection from Russian strikes.

“It is the ‘Patriots’ that work most effectively against Russian ballistics, and the supply of missiles to these systems is needed every day,” he said, thanking those who contribute to the PURL programme.

Election Reforms Take Centre Stage In Nigeria With 2026 Electoral Act

In 2022, millions of Nigerians celebrated what many described as a new dawn that promised to end the era of ballot-snatching—thanks to technology. Fast forward four years, and that dream is facing its ultimate test.

Inside the Senate, while the air-conditioning hums within the Red Chamber, the atmosphere is “unusually rowdy.” Lawmakers are on their feet as they debate a bill that could reshape Nigeria’s electoral future.

At the heart of this struggle is the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2026. But a single phrase in the proposed piece of legislation, “manual fallback,” is feeling like a step backward to a nation still nursing the scars of its last general election.

The firestorm started when the Red Chamber moved to amend Clause 60(3), a development that touched on the third rail of election conduct in Nigeria: the transmission of results.

“The presiding officer shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the IREV portal in real time, and such transmission shall be done after the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the presiding officer and/or countersigned by the candidates or polling unit agents…” the proposed amendment read.

Although many in the opposition and civil society organizations wanted “real-time” transmission of the results, the Senate approved the electronic transmission of results but allowed for the manual option via Form EC8A in case of internet failure.

The Senate defended the move, saying it was a necessity based on the realities of Nigerian society.

“We must be realistic about internet penetration,” Hon. Akin Rotimi (Ekiti North I), a lawmaker and spokesperson for the House, said on Channels Television’s Politics Today. “You cannot disenfranchise millions of voters simply because a server in a remote village cannot connect to the IReV in real-time.”

Senate spokesman Yemi Adaramodu echoed a similar sentiment, arguing that the lawmakers were thorough in their job.

“We don’t do something that we just wake up just on impulse… You have to be very thorough. You have to be very painstaking,” the spokesman added. “It must be so painstakingly done that the flaws must not be so latent to the extent that it can repudiate whatever good trust that Nigerians will have in our system.”

But for many, the manual result collation option triggers memories of the 2023 Presidential Election Petition Judgment. During that cycle, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) reported “technical glitches” in the IReV (INEC Result Viewing Portal).

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that the Electoral Act 2022 did not explicitly compel INEC to use electronic transmission for result collation. According to the court, Form EC8A—the paper result—was the primary method of determining the outcome of elections.

Before then, the Labour Party (LP) had approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking to compel INEC to adopt an electronic method for transmitting results. However, Justice Emeka Nwite dismissed the case and ruled that Section 60(3) and (5) of the Electoral Act allowed INEC to choose its method.

The court said the IReV portal appeared only in INEC’s Regulations and Guidelines, lacking legal force, and its use remained discretionary.

Indeed, Nigeria’s elections have for a long time been marred by allegations of manipulation during the collation stage. To address this, INEC introduced the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the IReV ahead of 2023.

The goal was to ensure that once results are counted and signed at polling units, they are uploaded online for everyone to see. Both judgments effectively ensured the million-naira IReV portal was basically a viewing tool, a development critics believe makes technology an “option” in the 2026 Bill.

A Coalition of Dissent

Beyond the Senate’s defense, a chorus of dissent is growing louder. Ex-vice president Atiku Abubakar, who officially joined the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC) in November 2025 as part of a coalition move, is among the vocal critics. He believes a mixture of two options will invite chaos.

“Nigerians were expecting real-time electronic transfer… But what we got is a mixture of electronic and manual transmission, which is going to cause more confusion or chaos,” he said after meeting with ex-military leader Ibrahim Babangida in Minna.

“This is not about me contesting elections. It is about Nigerians who want electronic transmission of election results.”

Peter Obi, the former Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate, joined the #OccupyNASS protest at the National Assembly on February 9, 2026.

“Most importantly, election results must be transmitted electronically and in real time to protect the people’s mandate and eliminate manipulation. Claims that certain states lack network coverage are no longer acceptable,” he said.

He argued that if the banking sector can function flawlessly, elections have no excuse.

“If banking systems function seamlessly, our electoral system can and should do the same,” Obi said, cheered on by hundreds of demonstrators.

That protest ground was filled with placards and chanting. Some of the protesters included the activist Aisha Yesufu, who stood alongside civil society advocates, accusing lawmakers of last-minute changes to favor political interests.

“All we are asking for is real-time electronic transmission of the electoral results. We are here, and we are waiting for the lawmakers we sent to Abuja to pass the bill the way it should be passed. All citizens are asking for is electronic transmission, real-time. I do not see any reason why that is a problem,” Yesufu said.

Legal experts have also weighed in on the matter, including Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), who pointed out that without the “real-time” mandate, the IReV portal remains legally vulnerable.

According to him, the 2026 amendment is a “missed opportunity” to give the digital results primacy over paper records in court.

The Senate’s position contrasts sharply with that of the House of Representatives, which, in its amendment, mandated the electronic transmission of results. According to Clause 60(3) of the House version, INEC is to electronically transmit results to the IReV in real-time, alongside the physical collation, and even imposes stiffer penalties for vote-buyers.

This discrepancy has created a legislative deadlock. To address it, Senate President Godswill Akpabio has constituted a 12-member Conference Committee led by Senator Simon Lalong. The high-powered committee includes:

The members are:

1. Senator Simon Bako Lalong – Chairman

2. Senator Mohammed Tahir Monguno – Member

3. Senator Adamu Aliero – Member

4. Senator Orji Uzor Kalu – Member

5. Senator Abba Moro – Member

6. Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong – Member

7. Senator Aminu Iya Abbas – Member

8. Senator Tokunbo Abiru – Member

9. Senator Niyi Adegbonmire (SAN) – Member

10. Senator Jibrin Isah – Member

11. Senator Ipalibo Banigo – Member

12. Senator Onyekachi Nwebonyi – Member

“When you meet, you should recognize that this is a matter of urgency,” Akpabio told the committee during the emergency plenary. “I believe that if you are able to conclude within the next few days or one week, the President should be able to sign the amended Electoral Bill into law within the month of February.”

That urgency is real, especially with the 2026 FCT Area Council elections and the governorship polls in Ekiti and Osun later in the year.

Ahead of these elections, the INEC Chairman, Joash Amupitan, has re-echoed the need for a clear legal framework for the commission to avoid the pitfalls of the past.

The story of the 2026 Electoral Act is more than just debates about servers and election result sheets; it is what many have described as a fight for the soul of the Nigerian polls.

Although lawmakers and some politicians are being pragmatic over calls for “real-time” election results transmission, civil societies and members of the opposition argue that without it, the 2027 elections would be dead on arrival.

“Once they put that law that you must transmit from the polling unit, I am okay. So any polling officer would not leave the polling unit,” a member of the ADC and an actor-turned politician said.

“The House of Representatives should go further to say that where it is not possible to transmit from the polling unit, that election should be cancelled.”

When asked if it would be fair to cancel an entire process where electronic transmission of results doesn’t happen, Okonkwo said the reason for accreditation and voting is for the result.

Tuchel extended England stay for ‘amazing players’

Steve Sutcliffe

BBC Sport journalist
  • 25 Comments

Thomas Tuchel says he extended his contract as England manager through to Euro 2028 because of the “amazing group of players” at his disposal.

The German took charge in January 2025 and his time as Three Lions boss had originally been set to end after this summer’s World Cup.

However, the 52-year-old admitted his “connection to the players and to the job itself” had grown as England claimed eight wins from eight matches to waltz through qualifying for the tournament in Canada, Mexico and the United States.

“The main reasons I took the job in the first place were the players,” Tuchel said.

“I wanted to be around this amazing group of players. I wanted to coach these characters that I already knew from the Premier League.

“I love the group of players. I love the characters, I love being in charge. I felt the passion in the country when the Euros were held at Wembley. From there it was more a dream than a reality.

“I’m very grateful for the support and trust of the FA and we will put all the effort in to make everyone proud and to keep on going.”

When Tuchel accepted the England job, it was his first incursion into the international arena.

Having enjoyed success with the likes of Borussia Dortmund, Paris St-Germain, Chelsea and Bayern Munich, he has adapted seamlessly to a different type of challenge away from the day-to-day issues he faced at clubs.

“We didn’t know exactly what was coming as an international manager,” Tuchel added.

“It was basically the point why I voted strongly for only 18 months contract in the first place, because I said ‘Listen, I have never done this. Can I first make sure that I love this and that I feel committed to the team, and I feel connected to the team’, because I think that is needed to be the best version of myself.

“It took me some months to understand it but as soon as the more condensed period arrived in September, October, November, it was the period where I felt the strongest connection to the players and to the job itself. And from there on I was fully committed to go even further.”

With the 2028 European Championship finals being hosted by England, Wales, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland, the temptation of leading a side into a home Euros, with the Football Association keen to back their man, also proved an irresistible reason for Tuchel to stay on.

“We had an excellent qualifying campaign, and both sides wanted to complete the cycle,” he added.

Unwanted speculation over jobs removed

While some may draw parallels to the situation England faced after handing Fabio Capello a lucrative new deal prior to 2010 World Cup in South Africa, there can be no question that the FA’s move does at least provide some continuity and clarity in the short to medium term.

Having been strongly linked with Manchester United, where Michael Carrick is in charge until the end of the season, both Tuchel and the FA appear content to have removed any potential distractions heading into the World Cup.

“It didn’t have to be done, but it was a very positive, very welcome side-effect of it,” Tuchel added.

“It was the opposite, very important for me that we don’t do it just to have clarity in the World Cup, but we do it if we are convinced, and [FA CEO] Mark Bullingham especially made this very clear from the beginning.

“But it is, no doubt, a very welcome side-effect that we have clarity, no more speculation, no more rumours.

“There was no reason to be worried because I was obviously totally focused through the qualification period and right after that we started the talks. I was always committed to this idea of extending the contract, the FA were always committed – there were no games, no second thoughts.

Man Utd trio back in World Cup reckoning?

Kobbie MainooGetty Images

With question marks removed over his own future, Tuchel will soon have to navigate the recurring issues his predecessors have faced leading England into major tournaments.

That includes managing expectation levels and selection connundrums that appear to be commonplace whenever England are readying themselves for a World Cup or Euros.

And he appears to be relishing the prospect of making those decisions with Manchester United trio Kobbie Mainoo, Harry Maguire and Luke Shaw all likely to come into his thinking, having not featured under the German so far.

A change of manager and system has allowed Mainoo – a starter in the Euro 2024 final – to showcase his talent again after he was mystifyingly banished from United’s starting XI under former boss Ruben Amorim.

Meanwhile, Shaw and Maguire have impressed under Carrick, with Tuchel assessing all three players in United’s 1-1 draw at West Ham on Tuesday.

When questioned about Mainoo, Tuchel continued: “Absolutely back in the frame! First of all, it is great that he is back on the pitch. He is such a huge talent.

“He has already played a tournament from start to finish for England, so he is back in the picture, so is Luke Shaw and so is Harry Maguire.

Related topics

  • Football
  • England Men’s Football Team