News

Trump can keep National Guard in Washington, DC, for now: Appeals court

John Torode is in therapy to help manage his ‘grief’ at MasterChef axe

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36354878.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/1_ITV.jpg

Following a long-standing racism accusation, John Torode was fired from his position as MasterChef’s host, despite the fact that he had no memory of making the statement.

TV chef John Torode has revealed he is in therapy to deal with the “grief” of being sacked from MasterChef.

The BBC upheld a complaint Mr Torode, 60, had used “an extremely offensive racist term” during production, which he denies. The chef said there have been lots of “ups and downs, good and bad, highs and lows” in the five months since his dismissal, but added “things can change”, expressing gratitude for his “incredible life”.

Mr. Torode wrote in a reflective online post that: “Therapy has given me the right to not only be brave, but also to be real. Although fear is the one that keeps us alive, I wonder how much harm can it cause when we choose to shut it out, shut it down, and let it flow as it should.

The presenter, born in Melbourne, Australia, lost his job on the BBC programme months after co-host Gregg Wallace, aged 61, left the show amid complaints about his behaviour.

READ MORE: Loose Women set to air on Christmas Day for first time as ITV reveal festive scheduleREAD MORE: John Torode set for TV return with Christmas special with wife Lisa after MasterChef axe

Twenty years after he first hosted the program, a reboot from the 1990s original series, Mr. Torode described his dismissal as “an unexpected and brutal life change.”

The star admitted to having spent months of soul searching and receiving therapy to ease his shock in his online newsletter A View From The Fridge. He acknowledged having difficulty coming out in public about the scandal, but he claimed that as time goes on, it would be more convenient.

Finding a rhythm in my turbulent physical, illogical, and physiological state of mind, according to the father of four, has been challenging.

Continue reading the article.

Being able to express and express my feelings as I deal with the past five months and the effects they have had is becoming easier. For me and for those close to me, life has forever changed. No sympathy searching is done here; it is simply being honest.

Frustration and anger – why ‘huge question marks’ hang over Man Utd

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 111 Comments

That is it, frustrated and enraged.

In his first response to Manchester United’s 1-1 draw with West Ham on Thursday, Ruben Amorim summarized his own feelings in his opening statement.

However, he might have been speaking out for the entire United fanbase, including those who booed his team at Old Trafford.

Former United captain Roy Keane used similar terminology to sum up his thoughts regarding the current United side, and he was certainly speaking for him.

At the conclusion of another game, United led by a significant leap up the horizon of the Premier League, only to concede late and draw a point, Keane said.

“I wouldn’t believe or trust this team,” he said. More goals are [in them], but defensively and midfield are still a lot of a mystery.

Amorim’s words sounded unusually agitated, despite his insistent calmness.

He claimed that his tirade would end after the dressing room TV broke and his hand was cut in January when Brighton beat him at home.

Instead, he will hold off on announcing the outcome of the game at Carrington on Friday, believing it would be ineffective to speak with his players while the atmosphere is still high.

Amorim was aware, however, that something was wrong.

He was aware of why Diogo Dalot’s side couldn’t hold onto the second-half lead.

And he was aware of the goal-line clearance from Jarrod Bowen’s flicked header in the 83rd minute that Soungoutou Magasa scored in the 83rd minute to score his first English goal.

Nuno Espirito Santo, the team’s manager, described it as a “deserved” equaliser for the team, who are currently at the bottom of the table, with just two road points since August’s only away win at Nottingham Forest.

Amorim remarked, “It happened with a long ball.” The second ball is won by them over three other players.

Second balls can sometimes be used tactically. With the players we have, we make adjustments.

“The ball was far away from the opponent in the final minutes.” We can’t allow a team with such a taller player to have a corner.

A pattern is emerging, which Amorim finds problematic.

Keane cited Keane’s statement, “One minute, you think they are making progress, they could move fifth, but they don’t get the job done. They appear afraid to perform the task.

With a victory at Nottingham Forest on November 1st, United would have placed second. They needed an equalizer to draw because they were in the lead. The goal was equalizing in stoppage time, but the goal was met a week later when they had the same intention as they had with Tottenham.

If Everton could defeat Everton, a Champions League spot was immediately on offer right after the international break. At home, they lost to 10 men.

This is now fifth place, seven minutes away. They are now eighth overall, 11th overall, four points clear of them. No one is sure whether they are good, average, or poor.

United have made progress, despite the fact that with more than £200 million spent, that would not be as difficult as it was from last season’s 15th place.

United won three games in a row in October, and Amorim was named the month’s manager. Their run is now five wins. They seem to be going in the wrong direction.

Amorim refutes that idea.

He claimed that “it’s not going backwards.”

“There were a few moments. That is a possibility.

You were referring to the time we ran, and you claimed that we were perfect when you claimed otherwise. We lack consistency.

After 83 minutes, the goal has a long ball and we are in control,” the player said. Better is required.

On Monday, United travel to bottom-ranked Wolves. They will once more compete in the final match of a Premier League campaign, and once more there will be a goal to aim for, but each failure will result in lower results.

related subjects

  • Manchester United
  • Football

More on this story.

  • Manchester United bench
  • Ask Me Anything logo

‘Deep indignation’ after Ukraine diver switches to Russia

Via Getty Images, Pallo Bahmut, Uranus, and Future Publishing

After the European champion reverts to Russia, the Ukrainian Diving Federation wants diver Sofiia Lyskun to lose all honors.

Lyskun, 23, who won the European Aquatics Championships’ 10m synchro title last year, made the decision to change her nationality earlier this week.

The federation claimed Lyskun “deeply condemns” her actions and expresses deep indignation against her actions, notifying it, the coaching staff, or the Ukrainian ministry of youth and sports.

Such actions are categorically unacceptable, according to the federation, because they discredit both the Ukrainian national team, which fought tirelessly for the right to represent our nation on the world stage every day.

Lyskun claimed in the Russian newspaper Izvestia that she realized over the years that her Ukrainian coaches, who were “all gymnasts or trampoline athletes,” were no longer “growing.”

At a special meeting of the federation’s executive committee, it was decided unanimously to remove Lyskun from the Ukraine team and “strip her of all titles and awards received under the auspices of the federation.”

Additionally, it will “appeal to international sports institutions with a demand to apply sports quarantine to the aforementioned athlete in accordance with current international standards.”

Russian and Belarusian athletes were prohibited from competing in World Aquatics events following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Russians and Belarusians can now compete separately as neutral athletes without the use of their national flag or symbols, with these restrictions now being lifted.

related subjects

  • Diving

More on this story.

    • eleven hours ago
    Anastasia Potapova swings a tennis racquet
    • 2 July
    Great Britain's Andrea Spendolini-Sirieix

US military kills four in latest strike on boat in the Caribbean

Four people died in a fourth deadly attack by the US military on an alleged drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean, according to the Pentagon.

The administration of US President Donald Trump is facing new scrutiny over the strikes after it was revealed that a targeted boat had been struck twice during a September 2 attack.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

According to experts, a similar attack might be a war crime.

The US Southern Command stated in a post on X that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, was responsible for the most recent strike.

According to the statement, the military “launched a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel in a designated terrorist organization’s international waters.”

“The vessel was transiting along a well-known route for narcotics in the Eastern Pacific, according to information obtained from the intelligence team. The vessel’s four male narco-terrorists were killed, the statement read.

In the course of the campaign, the Trump administration has killed more than 80 alleged drug smugglers.

However, revelations made after the September 2 strike have prompted congressional bipartisan committees to conduct new investigations.

Following an initial strike, Hegseth did not order the second strike on the vessel, according to the White House. Instead, they claimed Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley was in charge of the second strike, which appeared to have killed two survivors of the first attack.

According to the White House, the second strike continued to be legal under the law of armed conflict. It is considered a war crime to target unarmed combatants, according to legal experts. It is prohibited to fire on shipwrecks, according to the military’s own manual.

Bradley gave a number of briefings held behind closed doors on Capitol Hill on Thursday. He denied having been given the order to murder every passenger on board.

The briefings were described in conflicting ways by legislators.

Republican Senator Tom Cotton, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, stated in an interview with The Associated Press that “Bradley was very clear that he was given no such order, to give no quarter or to kill them all.”

Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said, “The order was basically kill the 11 people on the boat.”

According to Smith, the survivors were “basically two shirtless people clinging to the bow of a capsized and inoperable boat, drifting in the water until the missiles come and kill them.”

Rights groups claimed that the strikes were equivalent to extrajudicial killings even before the September 2 double-strike attack was made public.

Alejandro Carranza’s family complained to a regional rights organization earlier this week that his right to life had been wrongfully killed in a US strike in September.

No use of force or declaration of war have been approved by Congress, despite the Trump administration’s description of the attack as part of a larger “war” against so-called “narco-terrorists.

The most recent attack comes as the US is bolstering its military forces close to Venezuela’s coast, with Trump repeatedly warning that land attacks could occur “very soon.”

Trump hails ‘great day for the world’ as DRC, Rwanda finalise peace deal

Rwanda’s and the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) leaders have been meeting with US President Donald Trump to sign a peace agreement that could put an end to the conflict between the two nations.

Trump praised the US-brokered deal on Thursday as a new chapter for the area, despite the ongoing violence there.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump remarked, “This is an amazing day: great day for Africa and great day for the world and these two nations.” They are “and they have a lot of pride.”

Initial discussions about the deal took place in June. In March, Felix Tshisekedi, president of the DRC, and Paul Kagame, his counterpart in Rwanda, met in Qatar to begin the discussions that led to the agreement.

The ceremony on Thursday brings the agreements to their conclusion.

The March 23 Movement (M23), an armed group supported by Rwanda, has been advancing further into the resource-rich east of the DRC, with the aid of the agreement raising hopes of putting an end to the conflict there.

Fears of a full-fledged conflict, similar to those experienced in the DRC in the late 1990s, when many African nations were involved and millions of people were killed, had increased as a result of the renewed violence.

The main issue Rwanda has with the DRC is allegations that it has been home to ethnic Hutu militias linked to the Tutsi population-focused ethnic Hutus militia’s 1994 genocide.

Rwanda agrees to end its support for M23 under the Trump-backed peace agreement, and the DRC will assist in “neutralizing” Hutu militias, notably the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda.

Additionally, both nations must respect one another’s territorial integrity.

The DRC’s Tshisekedi claimed on Thursday that the terms of the agreement represent a “turning point” for the area.

To give the people of the region a new perspective, a new outlook, Tshisekedi said, “they bring together, under a coherent architecture, a declaration of the principles of a peace agreement and the regional economic integration framework.”

He added that the agreement would “emerge into a new era of friendship, cooperation, and prosperity.”

Kagame, a Rwandan, claimed that the two nations’ mutual success depends on one another.

“The road ahead will have ups and downs.” Kagame continued, “There is no doubt about it.” I can assure you that Rwanda won’t be found lacking.

According to Al Jazeera’s Alan Fisher, who was based in Washington, DC, the DRC and Rwanda leaders appeared to understand that the agreement will need more than just a signing ceremony.

According to Fisher, the conflict is “a lot more ingrained, significantly more developed, and significantly more aggressive than many people have assumed.”

So the United States, the African leaders, and, of course, the two countries are under a lot of pressure to ensure that what emerges from this can lead to a lasting peace.

In July, the DRC and M23 had reached a separate agreement. The fighting continues in the eastern regions of the nation.

Goma, a crucial city that M23 captured early this year, is home to Amani Chibalonza Edith, 32, who told The Associated Press. “We are still at war.

“The front lines must remain active for there to be peace,” he said.

Trump, however, made an appearance optimistic about the chances for peace on Thursday in Washington, D.C.

The US president said, “We’ll see how it all works out, but I believe it will work out really well.”

Trump also made it known that the US would be negotiating with Rwanda and the DRC for purchases of rare earth minerals.

Trump continued, “We’ll be involved in importing some of our biggest and most successful businesses there.”

“And we’re going to pay for some of the assets, take some of the rare earth, and.” Everyone will earn a lot of money.

In developing technologies, energy production, and medical devices, rare earth minerals are used.

Trump has publicly endorsed the Nobel Peace Prize, claiming to have resolved eight world wars, despite the controversy over how many times that figure is raised.

He praised Rwanda and the DRC during the signing ceremony held on Thursday at the US Institute for Peace, a think-tank. His remarks toward another war-torn African nation, Somalia, stood in stark contrast to his embrace of the two leaders of the nations.

Trump yelled insults at Somalia two days before the ceremonial signing, calling it “hell” and saying it “stinks.”