Category World News

United States President Donald Trump says indirect talks between Hamas and Israel over a potential ceasefire in the war on Gaza and an exchange of captives were going “very well” and that he may travel to the Middle East later this week.

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Wednesday, Trump said that a deal is “very close”.

“Negotiations are going along very well,” he said. “I may go there sometime toward the end of the week, maybe on Sunday,” he said.

Senior officials from Qatar, Turkiye, Egypt and the US joined the delegations in Egypt’s Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh on Wednesday, the third day of the talks, as the mediators pressed the two sides to resolve their differences over Trump’s 20-point proposal.

The first phase of the plan calls for a ceasefire and the release of 48 Israeli captives held in Gaza, including 20 who are believed to be alive, and the release of Palestinian prisoners held in appalling conditions in Israeli jails.

Hamas has submitted its list of detainees to be freed as part of the proposed swap.

Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and special envoy Steve Witkoff, as well as Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer – a close aide of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – were participating in the negotiations on Wednesday, Israeli and Palestinian sources said.

Also joining the discussions was the prime minister of longstanding key mediator Qatar, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani.

The Hamas delegation includes leaders Khalil al-Hayya and Zaher Jabarin, two negotiators who survived an Israeli assassination attempt in Qatar’s capital Doha that killed five people last month.

In a statement released late Wednesday, senior Hamas official Izzat al-Risheq said the group welcomes the participation of Qatar’s prime minister and Turkiye’s intelligence chief, alongside Egypt’s intelligence chief, in the current round of talks.

He said their involvement gives the negotiations “a strong boost” towards achieving positive results on ending the war and facilitating a prisoner exchange.

A delegation from the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) armed group is also set to arrive in Egypt to participate in the indirect talks, according to a statement from the group.

The PIJ is the smaller of the two main Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip and is currently holding some Israeli captives.

For his part, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said the mediated negotiations had made “a lot of headway” and that a ceasefire would be declared if they reached a positive outcome.

Al Jazeera’s senior political analyst Marwan Bishara says the talks remain tense with “some serious disagreements”, as crucial details are yet to be hammered out – including the timing and the extent of an Israeli withdrawal, the makeup of the post-war administration for the Gaza Strip and the fate of Hamas.

“You could say that the initial phase of the initial phase is working out,” Bishara said. According to him, both sides appeared to agree on “some sort of parameters” for a captive-prisoner exchange.

“According to the plan, … after Hamas hands over the captives, then the war should be over,” Bishara said. “Israel says no, the war will be over only after Hamas disarms.”

Israeli attacks continue

Even as the talks progressed on Wednesday, Israel continued its attacks on Gaza. At least eight Palestinians were killed across Gaza over the previous 24 hours, the Palestinian Health Ministry said on Wednesday. At least 61 others were injured in attacks, it said.

Gaza’s Government Media Office said in a statement on Wednesday that Israel carried out 271 air and artillery strikes over the past five days despite calls from the US to stop the bombardment. The attacks targeted densely populated areas and shelters for displaced people across the enclave, killing 126 civilians, including women and children – with 75 of them in Gaza City alone.

Al Jazeera’s Tareq Abu Azzoum, reporting from central Gaza’s az-Zawayda, said the situation on the ground “looks extremely bleak” as Israeli drones are still targeting residential buildings, particularly in Gaza City.

“Civilians have said the scale of bombardment sounds less intense in comparison with the days preceding the onset of the current round of negotiations,” Abu Azzoum said.

“They say that might be a sign that mediators are exerting further pressure on Israel to at least mitigate the scale of its bombardment on Gaza for one reason: It’s to allow for Hamas fighters to retrieve bodies of Israeli captives as part of the first phase of the ceasefire deal,” he said.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that just 14 of Gaza’s 36 hospitals are partially functioning, and only a third of 176 primary care facilities work.

Hanan Balkhy, WHO regional director for the Eastern Mediterranean, said Gaza has been struggling with “dire shortages” of electricity, clean water and medicine, as well as broken equipment and damaged infrastructure in those health facilities still working.

“Some facilities have been hit and rehabilitated and hit once more,” she said.

Washington, DC – Two years into the war on Gaza, legal scholars have emphasised the importance of labelling the mass atrocities Israel is committing against Palestinians as a genocide due to the legal and political implications of the determination.

Additionally, experts stressed that it is the most accurate description of the Israeli campaign, and even some of Israel’s staunchest supporters acknowledged that the country has committed war crimes in Gaza.

But experts said Israel’s brutal assault is more than individual violations of the laws of war; it represents a push to destroy the Palestinians and must be described as what it is – a genocide.

Former United Nations official Craig Mokhaiber said genocide involves the violation of core rights that apply without exception; it also invokes an international responsibility to stop it.

“The obligations apply to all states,” Mokhaiber told Al Jazeera. “All states in the world are obliged to use whatever means they have in order to put an end to the genocide and to punish the perpetrators of the genocide and to prevent the genocide in the first instance.”

He noted that the formal name of the 1948 UN Genocide Convention is the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Adopted by 153 countries – including the United States, all Western powers and Israel – the convention is the ultimate international law on genocide.

“The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish,” it reads.

Susan Akram, director of Boston University’s International Human Rights Clinic, said describing the assault on Gaza as a genocide is “critical”.

“Genocide is the most serious of international crimes, and because of that, the Genocide Convention requires all states parties to prevent and punish it, so the recognition that it is genocide automatically triggers obligations on state parties,” Akram told Al Jazeera.

What is a genocide?

The convention defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.

Genocidal acts include killing and injuring members of the targeted group, prevention of births and imposing “conditions of life calculated to bring about” the physical destruction of the group.

Any one of the acts listed in the convention can amount to carrying out a genocide. It does not need to be all of them.

In the case of Gaza, UN investigators and rights groups have found Israel to be carrying out several of the acts listed in the convention.

“The Israeli authorities intended to kill as many Palestinians as possible through its military operations in Gaza since 7 October 2023 and knew that the means and methods of warfare employed would cause mass deaths of Palestinians, including children,” a UN commission of inquiry said in a report last month.

The UN investigators also pointed to a long list of Israeli officials and military commanders calling for collective punishment and mass violence against Palestinians as proof of genocidal intent.

The findings added to the growing consensus by rights groups and international legal scholars that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

Amnesty International, B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch, UN experts and the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) have all accused Israel of genocidal acts in Gaza.

So has the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, which is named after Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin, who is credited with coining the term genocide after the Holocaust.

Israel has turned most of Gaza into rubble, killing more than 67,000 people and injuring nearly 170,000 more.

Repeated forced displacement orders by the Israeli military have rendered nearly all of the territory’s population homeless, and a strict blockade on humanitarian aid has sparked a famine in the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli military has also been targeting medical facilities across Gaza while blocking fuel and medical supplies needed for the operation of hospitals in the enclave.

But Israel rejects accusations of genocide, often dismissing them as anti-Semitic, claiming that it is carrying out a self-defence campaign against Hamas.

The ICJ case

Israel is facing genocide accusations, brought by South Africa, at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), but the top UN tribunal could take months, if not years, to make a final determination in the case.

Still, the ICJ has issued three sets of provisional measures, including ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza.

In an interim ruling in January 2024, the ICJ found that it is “plausible” that Israel is violating the Genocide Convention.

Two months later, the court ordered Israel to enable the “unhindered provision” of aid to Gaza as deadly hunger was starting to spread in the enclave due to the Israeli blockade. Israel has not followed the order.

In May of that year, the ICJ issued another directive ordering Israel to halt its offensive against the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where most of the territory’s population was sheltering at that time. Israel continued with the operation.

The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory said in its September report that the first ICJ ruling put “all states on notice”.

“As such, the duty to prevent genocide was triggered due to the actual or constructive knowledge of the immediate plausibility that genocide was being or was about to be committed,” the report said.

Boston University’s Akram agreed.

“It’s not at all a mystery what states are required to do. They have to take all means within their powers to punish – and most importantly stop – an ongoing genocide,” she told Al Jazeera.

“So why this has not triggered a global sanctions regime is really a failure of the international system.”

‘Every individual’s obligation’

The International Criminal Court (ICC) may prosecute Israeli officials on genocide charges.

The ICC last year issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes in Gaza, including using starvation as a weapon of war. But the tribunal has not pursued genocide charges in the conflict.

With a US veto looming over any UN Security Council resolution critical of Israel, the enforcement of genocide prevention – outside international courts – largely falls to individual states.

Some international coalitions, including The Hague Group, have been pushing for concrete measures to hold Israel accountable for its abuses in Gaza.

Despite the shift in public opinion and the growing recognition of a Palestinian state, Israel has maintained strong trade and diplomatic ties with most of its Western allies.

Backed by the financial and diplomatic might of the US, Israel has been enjoying what rights advocates describe as impunity for its genocidal campaign in Gaza.

In the US, a group of Palestinians and Palestinian Americans sued the administration of then-President Joe Biden in the early months of the war for failure to prevent genocide.

The plaintiffs sought an order to halt US assistance to Israel.

Last year, Judge Jeffrey White dismissed the case, arguing that federal courts do not have jurisdiction over foreign policy.

Still, White found that the evidence presented in the case indicated “the ongoing military siege in Gaza is intended to eradicate a whole people and therefore plausibly falls within the international prohibition against genocide”.

“It is every individual’s obligation to confront the current siege in Gaza, but it [is] also this Court’s obligation to remain within the metes and bounds of its jurisdictional scope,” he wrote.

A political solution

Ernesto Verdeja, an associate professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame, said that while legal avenues to stop the genocide in Gaza are important, the solution is ultimately a political one.

“It’s a solution that requires real, sustained and broad-based political pressure, and that includes not only political leaders and states but also civil society movements to get the Israeli state to stop carrying out this absolutely appalling set of attacks on Gazan civilians,” Verdeja told Al Jazeera.

He added that the war on Gaza should be called a genocide for the sake of accuracy, underscoring that denial of the genocide in Gaza often pivots to justifying the mass atrocities Israel is committing in the enclave.

“The bad-faith version of the argument essentially says, ‘Well, it’s not really genocide; therefore, it’s justified,’” Verdeja told Al Jazeera.

He warned against focusing on legal technicalities, court rulings and definitions, rather than pushing to stop the horrors unfolding in Gaza.

Footage shows rescue dogs and workers combing through debris after a building collapse in central Madrid killed four people, including three construction workers and an architect. The six-story building was being converted into a hotel. Several people were also injured.