Category World News

Doctors say recent research on the risks of hormonal birth control underscores the difficulty of communicating nuance in the social media age as misinformation about women’s health spreads more quickly than ever.

The study, which was conducted in Sweden and tracked more than 2 million teenage girls and women under the age of 50 for more than ten years, found that despite the hormones used in the formula, there are still some small differences in the risk of breast cancer.

Additionally, the researchers observed a small, quick rise in recent or current breast cancer diagnoses. These findings are in line with previous significant studies, such as a&nbsp, a&nbsp, and a&nbsp, 2023 meta-analysis.

It appeared online in JAMA Oncology on October 30.

Doctors claim that women should continue using birth control and that these study findings won’t affect how they advise patients.

However, TikTok is flooded with fact-incomplete warnings that contraceptives are just as dangerous as smoking. Reproductive health advocates warn against the condensed impact of studies like this on the internet, which can be easily taken out of context, taken out of context, and smeared as a single alarming number.

For instance, according to the study, women who used hormonal birth control had a 24% higher breast cancer rate than those who didn’t. However, because younger women are still less likely to have breast cancer, the figure increases from 54 to 67 cases per 100 000 women annually, or about one case per 800 hormonal contraceptives users per year.

The risk is greatest when using up the current state and diminishing within five to ten years, according to co-authors Asa Johansson and Fatemeh Hadizadeh, both of whom are epidemiologists from Uppsala University.

That kind of nuance, according to Rachel Fey, interim co-CEO of Power to Decide, a group whose goal is to provide accurate information on sexual health and contraception.

Because it’s meant to scare people away from birth control, which has greatly improved my life, I get really upset, she said. It’s “extremely frustrating,” especially when presented in its absence. And then, in this era of social media, it can simply start spreading without anyone having any idea what it’s talking about.

The researchers also found that the risk for some progestins, such as desogestrel, was slightly higher with some, such as those found in Cyred EQ, Reclipsen, Azurette, and Pimtrea, but not with others, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate injections sold under the name DepoProvera.

How to interpret the findings

Because the study included both invasive breast cancers and early noninvasive lesions known as in situ tumours, growths that may never lead to life-threatening, according to some experts, the results should be analyzed with caution. The overall risk of clinically significant disease may appear higher than it actually is if these precancerous cases are included.

A significant portion of the “cases” never developed into invasive breast cancer, according to Lina S. Morch, a senior researcher and team leader at the Danish Cancer Institute. The Swedish study did not involve Morch. Before imposing new regulations or warnings about a particular hormone, she added that experts should wait for more information to come out about how early-stage and advanced cancers differ.

The doctor-patient exchange

For most patients, the study confirms what they already discussed in the exam room, and that decisions should be made according to each woman’s needs and values, even as scientists debate how to interpret the data’s more nuanced details.

At Boston Medical Center, Katharine White, the chief of obstetrics and gynecology, said this study won’t alter how she interacts with her patients.

In an email, White writes, “When advising patients about their contraceptive options, I pay particular attention to their previous experiences with birth control, their medical history, and what’s important to them regarding their birth control method and pregnancy planning (if applicable).” “My counseling on hormonal and non-hormonal methods already includes a significant portion of the side effects and risks of methods,” says Dr. J.

Other doctors noted that there are other ways to use birth control.

The copper IUD offers safe, convenient, highly effective contraception for over a decade after placement, and is quickly reversible when pregnant, according to Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, the chief of general internal medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. It is a type of long-acting intrauterine device that is known as “for those who prefer hormone-free contraception.”

This was a significant, high-quality study that examined a variety of hormones over a long period of time, according to Mary Rosser, director of Integrated Women’s Health at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. However, she continued, “Medicals shouldn’t yet change their advice.”

The outcomes should serve as a guide for shared decision-making, Johansson and Hadizadeh asserted. They said, “It may be reasonable to take into account formulations with lower observed risk in our data.” They noted that desogestrel-only contraceptives should be avoided if other options are available, and that products containing medroxyprogesterone acetate, drospirenone, or levonorgestrel were linked to lower risk.

Keeping the risk in perspective

Beyond preventing pregnancy, hormone birth control has a number of health advantages. After stopping, it can ease endometriosis pain, lighten long periods, and reduce the risk of ovarian and uterine cancers for years. Even the smallest risks, according to Morch, are worth discussing, but making decisions should be influenced by women’s “values and preferences.”

White emphasized the importance of having a holistic view. Any risks of birth control must be weighed against the risk of an unexpected pregnancy, she wrote, because “people who don’t use contraception have an 85 percent chance of an unintended pregnancy.”

Unwittingly, a new transparency feature on X has revealed that many of the site’s top MAGA influencers are foreign actors creating division in the US. According to Soraya Lennie, it has caused a stir on social media.

Thanks to new security measures, the streets of Somalia’s capital Mogadishu are now bustling and open for business. However, Catherine Soi from Al Jazeera discovered that every checkpoint and patrol serve as reminders of a city that is still under constant threat of al-Shabab.

Members of the UN Security Council urged Israel to follow the ceasefire and bolster border crossings to lessen Gaza’s severe humanitarian crisis. Palestinians claim that their access to food, water, and shelter is still difficult because aid flows are still far below what is required.

Madrid, Spain – Real Madrid fans divided over plans to allow private equity investors to purchase up to 10% of the club, according to club president Florentino Perez.

Los Merengues fans claimed that selling a portion of Real Madrid would mean selling the entire franchise, despite the fact that the latter is still the richest football team in the world.

They also pointed out that Real Madrid’s membership policies have recently been changed, violating commitments to keep families members, and tarnishing its appeal.

Others praised the investor plan, which made sense of business and wouldn’t alter a hugely successful club that has won the Spanish domestic title 36 times and won 15 UEFA Champions League titles in a record-breaking amount.

Perez argued that it was “indispensable project” for the future of football to allow private equity investors, who frequently invest large sums of money in businesses that are not listed on public stock exchanges.

According to reports from The Associated Press news agency, Perez said he would discuss a statutory change with the club’s members on Sunday and that he would propose it during an extraordinary assembly to allow for the possibility of taking a minority stake in the club.

Although Real Madrid will continue to be a members’ club, he urged the establishment of a subsidiary where the 100 000 club members would always have complete control.

“On that basis, this subsidiary could simply incorporate a minority stake, such as 5%, never more than 10%, from one or more investors who are committed to investing for the very long term and willing to contribute their own resources.”

Perez argued that would be “the most eminently believable and clearest way to value our club.”

The 78-year-old added that it would allow the club to receive dividends from club members, which it is currently forbidden from doing.

Perez urged investors to “respect our values,” support the club’s expansion, and “help us protect our assets from external attacks.”

Real Madrid might be able to recoup its assets from investors, he claimed.

Perez repeatedly stated that the club’s members would never lose control.

He claimed that his proposal would allow the current 98,272 club members to be recognized as the true owners and have a future-determined membership limit.

No one will be able to alter the balance that guarantees Real Madrid’s independence and stability with the protection in place, Perez said. The members of today will be in charge of upholding our culture’s values and making sure our club continues to be a global football force for many generations to come.

The president of Real Madrid added that the change would “protect the club from external and internal attacks on our assets, and highlight their value in a way that we, as members, are all aware of the treasure we, as members, have in our hands” (p. 21).

Spanish club ownership versus English club ownership

Real Madrid is categorized as a nonprofit organization because its club members, or socios, own it, like Barcelona and a small number of other Spanish football clubs. This ownership structure has only ever existed for Real Madrid, which was established in 1902.

Large private investors can claim tax breaks as a result of this ownership structure, which also grants them the right to obtain a majority controlling stake in the clubs.

Real Madrid was named the world’s richest football team for the fourth consecutive year in 2025, with an estimated market value of $6.75 billion, as reported by the Forbes List. Additionally, it was the first club to generate $1 billion in revenue.

With the nonprofit status, Spanish clubs can keep some of their clubs’ traditions alive and have members who are active in the organizations.

The example of Joan Laporta, the current president of the other Spanish mega club, Barcelona, was cited by Graham Hunter, a British football journalist with a focus on Spanish football.

In seven years, Laporta went from being a member and a lawyer to becoming the club’s president, he said.

In stark contrast, football teams in England and the United States, including Inter Miami and Manchester United, can be owned by individuals, businesses, and occasionally even be acquired on public stock exchanges, creating more commercialized ownership structures.

It means that their club’s performances are frequently focused on more tactical things like profit maximization, whereas in Spain, fans are the owners of the club, not large private investors, giving them the opportunity to implement longer-term business plans.

This could help this well-known Spanish club to resemble its foreign rivals if Perez’s plan is implemented.

Should the new minority ownership laws be implemented, Bernard Arnault, the famous, multi-billionaire manager of Louis Vuitton, was named in Spanish media as a potential investor in the club.

Fans’ responses

Some Real Madrid supporters disapproved of Perez’s desire to open the club to large private investors.

Perez had previously promised to keep the club open to members, according to former season ticket holder David Garcia at the Santiago Bernabeu stadium.

Florentino Perez misled the audience once more on Sunday, according to Perez. He informed Al Jazeera that he had informed us that he had informed us that members’ children or grandchildren had to be in order to stop a Russian or Chinese person from joining the club.

Garcia continued, noting that Chinese and other foreigners had recently been listed on membership lists and that the admissions procedures had changed frequently in recent years.

Former Real Madrid Veterans Pena vice president Alejandro Dominguez questioned why it was necessary to find additional investors to boost the finances of such a successful club.

“I don’t understand why we need more money given that we are already the world’s richest club”? he told Al Jazeera.

However, Fernando Valdez, a long-time supporter of Real Madrid and a member of the La Gran Familia supporters’ club, asserted that the change would not harm the club’s character.

“It would be worrying if we were selling off significant amounts of the club to raise money to compete with Paris Saint-Germain,” the statement read. But that is not how he said.

“We need to know more details about this, but it doesn’t seem like anything to worry about,” the statement read. Nothing is five percent or ten percent.

Perez’s ownership plan, according to David Alvarez, who writes about Real Madrid for El Pais newspaper.

“This will enable the club to return rewards to socios (club members).” The law currently forbids them from doing that. They aren’t trying to do that because they would need to sell a lot more stock to compete with the other large clubs in Europe.