Trump claims Middle East countries offered to fight Hamas in Gaza

In response to the flimsy ceasefire in the area, US President Donald Trump has made the suggestion that several Middle Eastern nations have offered to send forces to Gaza to combat Hamas. He has also reiterated his threats to the Palestinian organization.

On Tuesday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that “some of our NOW GREAT ALLIES in the Middle East, and areas surrounding the Middle East, have explicitly and strongly informed me that they would welcome the opportunity to enter GAZA with a heavy force and “righten our Hamas” if Hamas continues to act badly in violation of their agreement with us.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump didn’t specify which nations offered to enter Gaza, but he did mention Indonesia as a potential partner.

Trump praised Indonesia, a great and powerful nation, and its wonderful leader for all the support they have provided to the Middle East and the United States, according to Trump.

No nation has indicated that it would clash directly with Hamas, despite Jakarta and other governments’ offers to send peacekeeping troops to bring back stability and security in Gaza.

“This is the most incredible show of love and spirit for the Middle East in a thousand years!” It is stunning to see! I declared, “Not YET! !” to these nations and Israel. Hamas may continue to pursue its goals, according to the US president.

“Hamas will end in a hurry, finite, and brutal” if they don’t!

Since the ceasefire ended on October 10 and nearly 100 Palestinians have been killed by Israel.

Trump frequently threatens Hamas with the same kind. However, it is unclear what Israel’s ability as a US or any other force can do to strong-arm the Palestinian group.

In a genocide campaign, which led to the deaths of most of Hamas’ political and military leaders and was supported by Israel, leveling Gaza to the ground, and imposing famine on the area, according to leading rights groups and UN investigators.

Trump had hailed the ceasefire, which his administration had helped to broker, as a historic turning point for regional peace.

Israel has been killing Palestinians since the start of the truce, asserting that they were approaching unmarked areas under Israeli military control.

In addition, Israel has continued to restrict aid to Gaza despite promises made in the agreement that would have prompted an increase in humanitarian aid to the area.

Israel has only permitted the entry of 986 aid trucks since the start of the ceasefire, a fraction of the 6,600 trucks expected, at a rate of 600 per day, according to the Gaza Government Media Office.

Israel launched a series of airstrikes on Sunday that left the agreement at odds with it and completely curbed Gaza’s access to aid after two Israeli soldiers were killed in Rafah.

Hamas claimed responsibility for the troop deaths, but the Palestinian organization refuted any involvement, underscoring the fact that the incident occurred in a region under Israeli control.

The Israeli soldiers were killed after they crossed an unexploded ordnance, according to some US media reports.

Questions remain over Gaza’s long-term future, including how the territory will be administered, in addition to the everyday problems that threaten the truce.

Hamas must disarm, according to Trump, but the Palestinian organization has linked giving up its weapons to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

No precise date has been set for Hamas’ disarmament, Trump told Fox News on Sunday.

WFP says food supplies to Gaza below targets, urges more crossings to open

Doubts emerge over Trump-Putin Budapest summit

Concerns are growing about the likelihood of Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump discussing a ceasefire in Ukraine quickly.

Moscow made an appearance on Tuesday, downplaying the possibility of a summit, claiming that there is “no precise time frame” and that preparations for a meeting between Russia’s and the US “could take time.”

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Prior to this, reports in the American media suggested that Moscow and Washington disagreed on the need for a resolution to the conflict.

Trump’s claim that the meeting could take place in Budapest was questioned by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who stated to reporters that there is “no understanding” in Moscow regarding a possible date.

Peskov claimed that “no precise timeframe was initially set for this situation.” “Serious preparation is required,” the saying goes.

Reports that a planned preparatory meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and his US counterpart Marco Rubio won’t take place this week also sour the prospects for a near-term summit.

Sergei Ryabkov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister, called the pre-meeting details “premature” on Tuesday.

On Monday, Lavrov and Rubio spoke via phone, and their conversation may have caused some expectations to differ.

According to CNN, their meeting has been “tabled, at least for the moment,” according to a source who cited informed sources. One source also cited US concern that Moscow is sticking to a “maximalist stance” regarding the terms of a ceasefire.

Lavrov continued to defend the report as “unscrupulous” despite the assertion that Moscow’s position hasn’t changed since Trump and Putin met with Putin in Alaska two months ago.

According to Lavrov, “Russia has not altered its position in light of the agreements reached at the Alaska summit.”

He added that Rubio had received this information from him directly.

The next Trump-Putin summit, which Trump announced after a phone call with Putin on October 16 in Russia, had less of an impact on how the two parties agreed to work together in Alaska, according to the Russian diplomat.

Putin stated at the summit that while putting an end to the war, the “primary causes” of the conflict must be eliminated for a lasting solution.

Prior to now, Moscow’s “primary causes” included demands for territory, Ukraine’s “neutrality,” and the destruction of its military might.

Putin chooses to use violence, continues.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, and a number of European leaders criticized Moscow for dragging its feet in efforts to end world peace while continuing to “violence and destroy” its neighbor.

In a joint statement released by Zelenskyy and eight other European leaders, “Russia’s stalling tactics have demonstrated repeatedly that Ukraine is the only party serious about peace.” Putin continues to choose between violence and destruction, according to the statement.

Trump, who has promised to end the war quickly but failed to get specific concessions from Moscow, faces yet another setback from the summit delay.

Trump has most recently urged freezing of the current battle lines as a starting point for negotiations after months of resonant messages.

Both Zelenskyy and European leaders have embraced that position.

However, Putin has rejected numerous requests for a ceasefire and has kept a list of extreme demands, including significant territorial concessions, outlawed by Kyiv.

Fact-checking RFK Jr’s false claim linking autism to circumcision

United States Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr claimed on October 9 that there may be a link between autism and circumcision. However, experts say his claims are not based on rigorous and robust research.

“There’s two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, and it’s highly likely because they’re given Tylenol,” said Kennedy, who, like President Donald Trump, cited shaky research about the drug and autism when warning pregnant women against taking the acetaminophen.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Circumcision is the removal of penis foreskin, a typically elective procedure performed on infants largely for religious and cultural reasons.

We looked at the studies, one from 2013 and another from 2015.

Neither showed that circumcision causes autism. Neither had data on whether acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, was given to the patients in the studies.

The two papers found some association between circumcision and autism, but both had significant limitations, including small sample sizes.

Authors of both papers advised further research to confirm a relationship.

Decades of research show that acetaminophen is safe for infants and children when used as recommended and under a paediatrician’s guidance. No research shows that taking the drug as a child causes increased autism risk.

Acetaminophen is not universally recommended for circumcisions. Infant circumcision is typically performed with a local anaesthetic. Some hospital guidelines advise parents to give infants acetaminophen as needed for pain in the days following the procedure.

Asked about Kennedy’s statements on circumcision, a Health and Human Services Department spokesperson pointed us to the secretary’s October 10 post on X in which he pointed to the 2015 study and an unpublished research paper from 2025.

Unpublished article not new research

The 2025 paper Kennedy referenced in his X post has not been peer-reviewed. It is considered a preprint, which means it has not been vetted by other scientific experts in the field, a standard process for scholarly research that aims to ensure its quality and rigour prior to publication.

The paper was authored by researchers at WPLab, a North Carolina company that promotes a link between acetaminophen and autism. In September, The Atlantic reported that WPLab CEO William Parker, a retired Duke University associate professor, has been in frequent contact with Kennedy.

The WPLab paper starts by saying in its abstract that “overwhelming evidence” shows acetaminophen exposure in babies “triggers many if not most cases of autism spectrum disorder”. The company makes similar statements about causation in several other papers, but that view does not reflect scientific consensus.

The premise of the article posted this summer is that “evidence that acetaminophen triggers autism” has been “ignored and mishandled” in existing published research. It is a critique and analysis; it does not represent any new scientific research. It points to the 2013 and 2015 studies about circumcision and autism, but misrepresents the scope of the 2015 study’s findings. It does not explain that the 2013 study was a basic population-level look at circumcision rates and autism rates.

2013 study a ‘hypothesis generating’ exercise

Authored by UMass-Lowell epidemiologists, the 2013 peer-reviewed study aimed to see if there was an association (not causation) between giving young infants acetaminophen and developing autism. The study was described by the authors as a “hypothesis generating exploratory analysis”, meaning it was not intended to reach a conclusion about a link.

Circumcision was not the focus. Data about the procedure was analysed as if it were a proxy for giving Tylenol to a baby. But the study did not confirm whether the drug was given in the cases it cited.

The study looked at nine countries. For each country, it collected two pieces of data: the percentage of the population that was circumcised and its prevalence of autism in men. In some cases, the circumcision rate was estimated based on the number of Jewish and Muslim men in a country.

It used those few pieces of data to calculate a correlation.

“You can’t really do a correlation with any level of legitimacy from a statistical point of view on such a small sample size,” said Helen Tager-Flusberg, professor emerita at Boston University and founder of the Coalition of Autism Scientists.

The study said there was a positive association between a population’s circumcision rates and its autism rates, but cautioned there were “significant limitations” to the study and that “correlation is not causation and as such no causal inference is intended”. The authors called for more research to “confirm or disprove this association”.

Despite having no data on whether kids represented in the data were given acetaminophen, the study linked the finding to the drug’s use by looking at data from before 1995, around the time when acetaminophen became a tested treatment for circumcision-related pain. The study found a slightly weaker correlation pre-1995.

2015 study was in Denmark, where circumcision is rare

The 2015 Danish study explored whether being circumcised meant a boy was more likely to be diagnosed with autism before age 10. The study did not examine acetaminophen use.

The study found that the risk of autism was 46 to 62 percent increased in boys who were circumcised, but this finding needs a lot of context.

First, circumcision in Denmark is rare and happens mostly among Jewish and Muslim families. But the study had only circumcision data from hospitals and doctors’ offices, meaning it did not count procedures that happened in home religious ceremonies.

Additionally, because circumcision and autism diagnoses are both uncommon, those groups’ sample sizes were small. In a study of 342,877 boys born between 1994 and 2003, fewer than 1 percent (3,347 boys) were circumcised, and about 1.5 percent (5,033 boys) had autism. Just 57 boys had both.

“We’re talking about a relatively small number of children out of this very large Danish population,” Tager-Flusberg said. When the study broke the samples down by faith groups or eliminated incomplete data from the analysis, its findings were more dramatic but based on even smaller numbers. The finding of a 62 percent increased risk of autism was based on just 24 boys. Other researchers in the field publicly criticised the study for issues with its methods.

In 2019, one of the study’s authors, Morten Frisch, proposed that the Danish Parliament should prohibit circumcision until the age of 18.

Although the 2015 study did not look at acetaminophen use, the WPLab paper cited it as “some of the most compelling ‘standalone’ evidence that acetaminophen triggers autism in susceptible babies and children” – a statement Kennedy quoted from in his X post.

What’s behind the crisis between Colombia and the US?

NewsFeed

Colombia’s president, according to US President Donald Trump, is a “lunatic” who sells drugs. The US threatens to stop aid and Colombia recalls its ambassador are the latest incidents in a crisis that has gone beyond words. What’s happening is explained by Soraya Lennie.