Category World News

Australia had a few nervous moments but safely ‌chased down their 160-run victory target before tea on the final day of the fifth Ashes Test match against England, earning a five-wicket victory and a ‍4-1 series triumph.

Seamer Josh Tongue led England’s ‍battling rearguard with 3-42 but Alex Carey got Australia across the line with a four through the covers in the company of Cameron Green on Thursday.

“We’ve played so well as a team,” said Steve Smith, who was standing in for Pat Cummins as Australia captain for the fourth time in the series.

“We’ve had some incredible individual performances but … everyone else just stood up at different moments. I think that’s what makes a really good team. We won those ⁠big moments throughout the series.”

England will take credit for making a game of it and not being ground into the Sydney dirt as previous tourists have in end-of-series dead rubbers ​at the famous old ground.

Without the bowling of injured captain Ben Stokes, however, defending 160 was always going to be an uphill challenge on ‍a good wicket.

Australia’s openers managed to get the target under 100 runs before Man of the Match Travis Head, whose third century of the series underpinned his team’s first-innings 567, ballooned a shot to midwicket off Tongue for 29.

Jake Weatherald followed for 34, again caught off Tongue’s bowling, to bring up lunch with Australia 89 runs from their goal.

It ‍was 15 years and ⁠a day since England won the final Test of the 2010-11 series at the same ground by an innings and 83 runs – the last time they won an Ashes series Down Under.

Emotional Khawaja bows out

Usman Khawaja made his debut in that match and got his chance for one final innings before retirement when Smith was bowled through the gate by the spin of Will Jacks for 12 soon after lunch.

The England players formed a cordon to welcome Khawaja to the crease but Tongue’s bowling was less friendly and the left-hander played on for six after facing seven balls.

His farewell did not go as planned but Khawaja said it was a memorable occasion after a decorated 15-year career and more than 6,000 runs.

“I was trying to act cool, but the whole Test match I found it really hard to control my emotions,” the 39-year-old admitted afterwards.

“It means a lot. The only thing I wanted was a win,” he said.

“Grateful for the one last final win and to celebrate with my teammates.

Upon his dismissal, the batter stopped at a “Thanks Uzzy” sign on the ground and bowed down in prayer before returning to the pavilion.

Khawaja immigrated to Australia from Islamabad as a child, battling the odds to become the country’s first Pakistan-born and first Muslim national player.

At one point, he was the only Asian first-class player in Australia and is credited as a role model who opened doors for others.

“Some people have lost family, I am lucky my parents are still around. My family, my wife, my kids and another one on the way,” he said.

“I love the game of cricket but life outside cricket has been more important.

“Few dicey runs there with a little bit of pressure, but we got the job done in the end.”

Starc gets the job done

England had resumed their batting on 302-8 but Mitchell Starc struck a major blow to their hopes of setting Australia a testing target when he had Bethell caught behind for 154.

Bethell’s superb maiden Test century offered plenty of promise for the ‌future and was essentially the difference between an innings defeat for England and Australia batting again.

Starc (3-72) returned to remove ⁠Tongue for six to end the innings on 342, the left-arm quick later awarded Player of the Series honours for his tally of 31 wickets over the five Tests.

“The body is still holding together and this is a great group to be a part of,” the 35-year-old said. “I am a little tired but got the job done.”

In Sydney, Australia were again superior in every department, as they were when wins in Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide and secured possession ‌of the Ashes urn for another 18 months in just 11 days.

England won a lottery of a fourth Test in Melbourne – their first win in Australia since Sydney in 2011 – but the future of the “Bazball” style of play must be in doubt after a tour that started with high hopes ended in a 4-1 loss.

“We’ve not won the big series that we want to ‍be winning,” said Stokes.

“When a trend is happening on a consistent basis … that’s when you do need to go back and look at the drawing board and make some adjustments.”

For years, US oil giants like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips have been quietly lobbying for regime change in Venezuela. Donald Trump even gave them a heads up before he sent his military after Nicolas Maduro.

Beirut, Lebanon – At the end of last year, Lebanon’s army first took journalists and then international diplomats on tours that were meant to show what had been achieved in terms of dismantling Hezbollah’s military infrastructure along the country’s southern border with Israel.

At the time, Israel was increasing threats to expand its attacks if Lebanon failed to disarm Hezbollah.

The end of 2025 was the army’s self-imposed deadline to complete the first phase of its plan to bring all weapons in the country under state control.

Army commander Rodolphe Haykal said the tours were intended to highlight the army’s commitment to the efforts despite “its limited capabilities”. But he blamed Israel’s continued military actions and occupation of Lebanese territory along the border as complicating and undermining these efforts.

On January 8, Haykal will brief Lebanon’s government on the progress of the disarming mission. He’s expected to announce the completion of the plan’s first phase, which involves clearing the area between the Litani River, about 30km (19 miles) at its deepest point in Lebanon, and the country’s southern border with Israel.

But Israel already has a verdict on the army’s performance.

It says Hezbollah still has a presence close to the border and is rebuilding its military capabilities “faster than the army is dismantling [them]”. The United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon has a different take. It says there is “no evidence” that Hezbollah’s infrastructure has been rebuilt.

Israel also sent another message through its military actions days before the cabinet meeting.

It carried out intense air strikes on what it said were positions north of the Litani River some kilometres (miles) from the border in what a western diplomat said showed “Israel has no intention to wait for the army to move to the next phase to dismantle Hezbollah’s weapons.”

Litani River

“Israel has already shifted focus to phase two,” Joe Macaron, global fellow at the Wilson Center, told Al Jazeera. “And this phase is going to be different, difficult and challenging for the army.”

The second phase involves operations expanding north of the Litani River up to the Awali River north of the city of Sidon. “Hezbollah has made it clear there will be no disarmament north of the Litani, which means there is the possibility of political tension,” Macaron added.

Hezbollah, which has dismissed efforts to disarm it as a United States-Israeli plan, believes it has complied with a ceasefire agreement agreed with Israel because it understands the truce to apply “exclusively south of the Litani River”.

The November 2024 truce ended more than a year of hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel. The group’s critics in Lebanon say the ceasefire calls for the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which mentions the disarmament of all non-state actors across Lebanon.

“With the Israeli enemy not implementing any of the steps of the agreement … Lebanon is no longer required to take any action on any level before the Israelis commit to what they are obligated to do,” Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Naim Qassem said.

Political consensus

Hezbollah was long considered the strongest military force in Lebanon, although it has been weakened by the war with Israel, when much of its leadership was killed.

The group retains the support of Lebanon’s Shia community, which it emerged from.

“Assuming the Lebanese state and the army commander would try to disarm Hezbollah north of the Litani, Hezbollah and also the majority of the Shia community is going to rise and try to prevent this. They will act and there will be a violent reaction if that scenario will happen,” Ali Rizk, a political and security analyst, told Al Jazeera. “The community feels they are facing a twin threat … one from Israel and the other from the new regime in Syria, so that is why they are more supportive of Hezbollah’s weapons.”

Lebanese Army commander Hakyal reportedly told a recent military meeting that the army is carefully planning for the next phases of disarmament. Officials know that without political consensus, there is a risk of internal conflict.

But Lebanon’s leadership, which pledged to reassert full state sovereignty, is under pressure. Israel has publicly said it will act “as necessary” if Lebanon fails to take steps against Hezbollah.

“The state is ready to move on to the second phase – namely [confiscating weapons] north of the Litani River – based on the plan prepared by the Lebanese army pursuant to a mandate from the government,” Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said.

And then there is Iran.

Coinciding with Lebanon’s government meeting, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi will arrive in Beirut.

Following the abduction of Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro last week, the administration of US President Donald Trump has stated that it wants to quickly restore the country’s oil production and expand its mining sector.

“You have steel, you have minerals, all the critical minerals, they have great mining history that’s gone rusty,” US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters on Sunday from aboard Air Force One. “President Trump is going to fix it and bring it back.”

So, what reserves and resources does Venezuela have?

Largest known oil reserves

Venezuela has the world’s largest proven oil reserves, estimated at 303 billion barrels as of 2023, more than five times the amount the United States has, which is 55.25 billion barrels.

Venezuela is also one of the founding members of OPEC (the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries), having established the group in Baghdad in September 1960 alongside Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia.

Venezuela’s oil reserves are concentrated primarily in the Orinoco Belt, a vast region in the eastern part of the country stretching across roughly 55,000 square kilometres (21,235 square miles), which is controlled by Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA).

The Orinoco Belt holds extra-heavy crude oil, which is highly viscous and dense, making it much harder and more expensive to extract than conventional crude oil. As a result, it typically sells at a discount compared to lighter, sweeter crudes, such as those extracted from US shale.

Refining oil from this region requires advanced techniques that the US possesses, particularly in the states of Texas and Louisiana.

Who buys Venezuelan oil?

Venezuela was once a major oil exporter. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, it supplied roughly 1.5 to 2 million barrels per day to the United States, making it one of the US’s largest foreign oil sources.

However, political instability, mismanagement at PDVSA, a lack of investment, and US sanctions on the country’s energy industry have led to falling production.

In 2024, Venezuela produced an average of 952,000 barrels per day (bpd), compared to 783,000 bpd in 2023, according to PDVSA’s results as reported by OPEC. PDVSA’s oil sales abroad in 2024 amounted to $17.52bn, according to a Reuters report.

China is the largest buyer of Venezuelan crude oil and has been for the past decade. In November 2025, before the US military blockade began in December, Venezuela exported 952,000 barrels per day.

Of this, 778,000 barrels were sent to China, giving Beijing an 81.7 percent share of Venezuela’s oil exports. The US is the second-largest buyer, importing 15.8 percent of Venezuelan oil; followed by Cuba, which imported nearly 2.5 percent.

Natural gas

Venezuela ranks ninth in the world for natural gas reserves.

According to the International Energy Agency, as of 2023, Venezuela’s gas deposits totalled around 5.5 trillion cubic metres (195 trillion cubic feet), accounting for 73 percent of the total natural gas reserves in South America.

Most of these reserves are linked to crude oil, with around 80 percent of produced natural gas being a byproduct of oil production.

Gold

Venezuela possesses the largest official gold reserves in Latin America.

According to the World Gold Council, which monitors central bank holdings globally, Venezuela’s reserves are approximately 161.2 metric tonnes, worth more than $23bn in today’s market value.

Venezuela is also believed to hold some of the most significant untapped gold resources, but official data is outdated.

In 2011, former President Hugo Chavez announced the Orinoco Mining Arc, which would explore, nationalise and export metals. In February 2016, Maduro set out to further develop the area, with 12 percent of the country marked for mining across several states. The government said there were diamonds, nickel, coltan and copper reserves that it would mine.

In 2018, Maduro announced a “Gold Plan” to encourage investment in gold after signing mining deals with a number of foreign companies worth an estimated $5.5bn. However, none of these deals materialised, and most mines have remained under the control of non-state armed groups.

A 2018 mineral report by Venezuela’s Ministry of Ecological Mining Development estimated that the country holds at least 644 metric tonnes of gold, but the Venezuelan government has stated that the actual numbers could be much higher.

What other minerals does Venezuela have?

The 2018 minerals catalog estimated:

• Certified coal reserves of roughly 3 billion metric tonnes
• 14.68 billion metric tonnes of iron ore, of which 3.6 billion are proven
• 407,885 metric tonnes of nickel reserves
• Measured bauxite amounting to 99.4 million metric tonnes
• Reported reserves of diamonds amounting to 1,020 million carats in the Orinoco Mining Arc and 275 million carats alone in the area of Guanaimo

United States President Donald Trump has invited Colombian leader Gustavo Petro to the White House, days after accusing him of trafficking cocaine and threatening military action against his government.

The sudden detente on Wednesday followed an hour-long phone call between Trump and Petro, in which the two leaders discussed “the situation of drugs” and “other disagreements”, according to the US president.

It was their first call since Trump’s threat of a military operation in Colombia following the US’s abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in a brazen attack on Caracas on Saturday. The warnings prompted Petro to issue a call for Colombians to take to the streets to defend their sovereignty.

“It was a Great Honour to speak with the President of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, who called to explain the situation of drugs and other disagreements that we have had,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

“I appreciated his call and tone and look forward to meeting him in the near future.”

Trump added “arrangements are being made” for a meeting in Washington between himself and Petro, but gave no specific date for a meeting.

Petro, Colombia’s first left-wing president, addressed demonstrators who had heeded his call for protests at Bogota’s Plaza Bolivar following the call with Trump. He said a detente was under way and that he had to change his speech at the last minute.

“If we don’t speak, there is war. Colombia’s history has taught us that,” the former rebel fighter said.

“And what happened is that we talked and re-established communication for the first time. I talked about two things: Venezuela and the issue of drug trafficking,” he said. “I gave him our numbers of what we are doing to fight drugs.”

Petro also accused Colombian politicians of misleading Trump. “Those [people] are responsible for this crisis – let’s call it diplomatic for now, verbal for now – that has erupted between the US and Colombia,” he said.

Relations between Trump and Petro have been frosty since the Republican returned to the White House in January 2025.

Trump has repeatedly accused Petro’s administration, without evidence, of enabling a steady flow of ‌cocaine into the US, imposing sanctions on the Colombian leader in October.

Earlier this week, Trump described Petro as “a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States” and that he should “watch his a**” following the US attack on Venezuela.

“He’s not going to be doing it very long, let me tell you,” Trump told reporters on Sunday, and said a military operation there “sounds good.”

For his part, Petro had condemned the US attack on Venezuela as “abhorrent”, convened emergency meetings before the United Nations and the Organization of American States and even threatened to take up arms again to defend Colombia.

Petro and Trump also sparred last year when Colombia initially banned deportation flights from the US.  Washington in September also ⁠revoked Petro’s visa after he joined a pro-Palestinian demonstration in New York following a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly and called on American soldiers to “disobey the orders of Trump”.

Petro, who has been a vocal opponent of Israel’s war in Gaza, had accused ‌Trump of being “complicit in genocide” in Gaza and called for “criminal proceedings” over US missile attacks on suspected drug-running boats in Caribbean waters.

Despite the tensions, for Colombia, the US remains critical to the military’s fight against left-wing rebels and drug traffickers. Washington has provided Bogota with roughly $14bn in the last two decades.

For the US, Colombia remains the main source of intelligence used to interdict drugs in the Caribbean, and the cornerstone of its counternarcotics strategy abroad.

Colombia is also a “Major non-NATO ally” of the US – a designation that only belongs to a handful of countries like Australia, Japan and Qatar.

“The relationship between presidents Trump and Petro is volatile and unpredictable,” said Anthea McCarthy-Jones, an expert in Latin America affairs at the University of New South Wales.

“It seems to oscillate from exchanges involving threats and inflammatory language to more reasoned attempts to use diplomacy as a way forward,” she told Al Jazeera.

Colombia’s government, meanwhile, said cooperation between the two countries on intelligence, defence and law enforcement was continuing.

Colombia’s defence minister Pedro Sanchez told The New York Times this week that the “Navy, Coast Guard, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives” have been uninterrupted.