Why is the US Fed chair criminal probe causing global alarm?

Trump administration’s move against Jerome Powell fuels fears the Fed’s independence is being undermined.

The Trump administration’s decision to launch the first-ever criminal investigation into the head of the US Federal Reserve has prompted international alarm.

Jerome Powell also denounced the probe as politically-motivated.

But why is this case causing so much concern worldwide?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan

Guests:

Eric Ham – Political analyst and former US Congressional staffer in Washington DC

Justin Urquhart-Stewart – Investment manager and co-founder of Regionally, an online investment service in London

Ukraine’s former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko accused of bribery: Report

Ukraine’s former prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, has been accused of bribing members of the country’s parliament and running a vote-buying scheme, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) said, according to media reports.

In a statement on the Telegram messaging application on Wednesday, NABU said it had served charges of bribery to an opposition party chief after exposing several other lawmakers last month as members of a “systemic” plot to receive payments in exchange for votes.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“This concerned not one-off arrangements, but a regular cooperation mechanism that envisaged advance payments and was designed for a long-term period,” NABU added.

A source familiar with the matter told the Reuters news agency that Tymoshenko was the subject of the probe.

A spokesperson for the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) also told Ukrainian media that Tymoshenko had been charged after SAPO and NABU officers raided her Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) political party’s offices.

Tymoshenko, who rose to prominence two decades ago as a leader of the pro-democratic Orange Revolution and served as Ukraine’s prime minister in 2005, and again from 2007 to 2010, has denied “all accusations” but didn’t specifically address the probe.

In a Facebook post, the opposition leader pledged to clear her name in court.

Her political influence in recent years has significantly diminished, with her Fatherland party holding approximately two dozen seats in Ukraine’s 450-seat legislature.

The probe into Tymoshenko broadens an anticorruption campaign in Ukraine that has ensnared senior ministers and opposition lawmakers.

But tackling corruption remains a crucial condition for Ukraine’s European Union membership bid, a goal Kyiv views as central to its post-war future.

NABU and anticorruption prosecutors shocked Ukrainians last November by unveiling an alleged $100m kickback scheme in the energy sector involving a former associate of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Last July, the Ukrainian president had passed a bill which sought to curb the country’s anticorruption agencies’ independence.

But after November’s reports from NABU and following months of widespread protests against his controversial bill, Zelenskyy urged full cooperation with the investigation.

Child rights org says Google undermines parental control of child accounts

A child rights advocacy organisation in the United States is accusing Google of bypassing parental authority by allowing children to disable parental supervision over Google accounts after they turn 13.

Melissa McKay, president of the Digital Childhood Institute, stated on LinkedIn that Google sent her 12-year-old an email that will unlock additional tools once he turns 13, posting screenshots of the email.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

In Google’s frequently asked questions, it shows that children can disable tools that allow parents to supervise accounts once they are what is known as the minimum age in their country, which is often 13 in many countries.

Among the changes, once children turn the age of 13, they can turn off supervised experiences on YouTube and can add payment methods to Google Pay. Parents will no longer be able to block apps, turn on location sharing without the permission of the child user or block access to payment features.

“Google is asserting authority over a boundary that does not belong to them. It reframes parents as a temporary inconvenience to be outgrown and positions corporate platforms as the default replacement,” McKay said in a post on LinkedIn.

Parents are able to supervise Google accounts through a programme called Family Link up until age 13.

“In nearly ten years as an online safety advocate, this is among the most predatory corporate practices I have seen,” she added.

McKay first raised the complaint in October, in a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

“Enabling minors at this critical stage of development to terminate parental oversight, even when parents expressly seek to maintain such protections, constitutes a clear breach of duty of care,” McKay said in the letter shared with Al Jazeera.

McKay told Al Jazeera she had met with then FTC chairman Andrew Ferguson and said she had spent 45 minutes with him and his staff to walk through the complaints prior to sending the letter.

The 50-page document alleges that the Silicon Valley tech giant violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which is a law that puts limits on how tech companies can collect and use personal data from children under the age of 13.

The letter also alleges a violation of the 2014 FTC Consent Decree on in-app purchases, which requires platforms like Google to get parental permission before allowing such purchases by children.

Other parental rights activists echoed McKay’s worries.

“Our concern is that messaging like Google’s – telling a 13-year-old they can now remove parental supervision – sends the signal that parents are barriers to freedom, rather than partners in growth. This type of corporate language accelerates tech independence without any built-in safety net, education, or emotional readiness. We’re worried it normalises the idea that kids should ‘go it alone’ online just because they’ve reached an arbitrary age,” Joanne Ma, cofounder of DigiDefendr, a new platform that helps teach kids about safe practices online, told Al Jazeera.

Representatives for Alphabet, Google’s parent company, did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

The FTC did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

The Utah State Attorney General’s office, the state in which McKay is based, as well as Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who has been behind several pushes for age verification laws in the US – including regarding social media use and access to adult explicit material, did not respond to a request for comment.

A risky environment

Google has long been under the microscope for the relationship between kids and teens and their slate of tools. A lawsuit in 2025 alleged that the tech giant harvested data on Chromebooks used by students for schoolwork in public school systems around the US. Another report in 2024 alleged that Google sales representatives advised potential advertisers about how to target teens on YouTube.

In 2019, the tech giant also settled a lawsuit with the New York State Attorney General for collecting the personal data of children using YouTube. It paid $136m in fines to the FTC and another $34m to New York.

Even beyond Google platforms, the online landscape has been an increasingly volatile place for children and teens, and 48 percent of teens reported that social media usage had a negative impact on their mental health, according to a survey last year by the Pew Research Center.

As cellphone and technology use, especially among younger people, escalates, including the rising use of chatbots like ChatGPT, online safety experts are flashing warning signs. About 72 percent of the US teens say they use ChatGPT, for instance, and a report from the Center For Counting Digital Hate found that the OpenAI-owned chatbot lacked sufficient safeguards like age verification tools.

The report also assessed if the chatbot would encourage dangerous behaviours by creating personas showing tendencies for substance abuse, suicidal ideation and eating disorders, with 53 percent of responses to prompts deemed as harmful.

Trump administration to suspend immigrant visa processing for 75 countries

The United States says it will suspend immigrant visa processing for 75 countries around the world, as US President Donald Trump’s administration continues its wide-reaching crackdown on immigration.

The Department of State said on Wednesday that visa processing would be paused for countries “whose migrants take welfare from the American people at unacceptable rates”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“The freeze will remain active until the US can ensure that new immigrants will not extract wealth from the American people,” it said, adding that the measure would affect “dozens of countries”, including Somalia, Haiti, Iran and Eritrea.

Trump has pursued a hardline, anti-immigration agenda since he returned to office in January 2025, promising to carry out the largest deportation operation in US history.

Over the past year, he has announced curbs to several US visa programmes and drastically slashed the number of planned refugee admissions into the US.

His administration has also deployed heavily armed immigration officers to major US cities to detain and deport people accused of being in the country illegally.

The State Department said earlier this week that it has revoked more than 100,000 visas since Trump’s return to the White House, a one-year record.

The Department of Homeland Security last month said the Trump administration has deported more than 605,000 people, while 2.5 million others left the US on their own.

The State Department did not immediately release a full list of the countries that will be subjected to the freeze on immigrant visas on Wednesday.

The AFP news agency, citing an unnamed US official, said Brazil, Egypt, Thailand, Nigeria, Iraq and Yemen would be among those affected.

Meanwhile, a State Department spokesman said the freeze on immigrant visa processing would begin on January 21.

The move will not apply to applicants seeking non-immigrant, or temporary tourist or business, visas.

David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, said the Trump administration “has proven itself to have the most anti-legal immigration agenda in American history”.

“This action will ban nearly half of all legal immigrants to the United States, turning away about 315,000 legal immigrants over the next year alone,” Bier said in a statement.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said Wednesday’s announcement, when combined with previously announced US travel bans, means the Trump administration “has now banned or suspended immigrant visas for 90 different countries”.

Three Palestine Action activists end UK hunger strike

Three detained British activists who spent weeks refusing food have ended their hunger strike, citing a report that a United Kingdom-based subsidiary of a major Israeli weapons company was denied a UK government contract.

The Prisoners for Palestine group said in a statement on Wednesday that hunger strikers Kamran Ahmed, Heba Muraisi and Lewie Chiaramello ended their strike after one of their “key” demands was achieved.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“Our prisoners’ hunger strike will be remembered as a landmark moment of pure defiance; an embarrassment for the British state,” the group said.

Several people affiliated with the proscribed group Palestine Action had refused food in UK prisons since November in protest of their detention and the British government’s support for Israel as it wages a genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza.

The activists’ relatives and friends had warned that their prolonged hunger strike put them at risk of serious health problems and even death.

The Times reported on Tuesday that Elbit Systems UK, a subsidiary of the Israeli arms manufacturer of the same name, had failed to win a $2.69bn contract to help train British soldiers.

Citing an unnamed UK Ministry of Defence “insider”, the news outlet said the department instead chose to award the contract to a rival consortium led by Raytheon UK.

“The abrupt cancellation of this deal is a resounding victory for the hunger strikers, who resisted with their incarcerated bodies to shed light on the role of Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, in the colonisation and occupation of Palestine,” Prisoners for Palestine said.

For years, Palestinian rights activists have called on countries to divest from Elbit Systems over its role in supplying the Israeli military with weapons used in alleged war crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory.

That includes the war-ravaged Gaza Strip, where Israel’s military assault has killed more than 71,000 Palestinians since October 2023.

The Palestine Action hunger-strikers were jailed over their alleged involvement in break-ins at the UK subsidiary of Elbit Systems in Filton near Bristol in 2024.

The British government proscribed Palestine Action in June of last year under the country’s Terrorism Act 2000, making it illegal for people to join or express support for the group under penalty of up to 14 years in prison.

Since then, scores of people have been detained at protests across the UK for expressing support for the group in what critics say is a draconian crackdown on freedom of speech and assembly.

On Wednesday, Prisoners for Palestine said a total of seven activists had started to eat again after ending their hunger strikes.

British MP John McDonnell hailed the hunger strikers’ “dedication” in a social media post.

UK prosecutors seek to reinstate ‘terrorism’ charge against Kneecap rapper

British prosecutors have sought to reinstate a “terrorism” charge against a member of Irish rap group Kneecap for allegedly displaying a flag of Lebanese group Hezbollah during a gig in London, after a judge threw out the case last year.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) launched a High Court challenge on Wednesday, arguing that a chief magistrate erred in September when he dismissed the case against Liam O’Hanna, also known as Liam Og O hAnnaidh in Irish, over a technical error.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

O’Hanna, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with displaying the flag at a November 21, 2024, concert in London, breaching the United Kingdom’s 2000 Terrorism Act.

In written submissions unveiled in court, the CPS “submits that the Learned judge was wrong to find that the proceedings … were not instituted in the correct form”.

Kneecap – known for their politically charged lyrics and support for Palestinian rights – have said the case is an attempt to distract from what they described as British complicity in Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

The band has called the attempted prosecution of O’Hanna a “British state witch-hunt”.

“Today more Palestinians were murdered by Israel,” Kneecap wrote in a social media post on Wednesday after the court hearing.

“More homes demolished and more children dead due to cold and lack of aid not permitted to enter by Israel. That is the ONLY thing about this whole witch-hunt worth talking about,” the band said, denouncing the legal proceedings as “a waste of public time and public money”.

Supporters of Irish rap group Kneecap band member, Liam O'Hanna, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, hold placards as they gather outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of the singer's arrival in London on January 14, 2026.
Kneecap supporters rally in defence of O’Hanna on January 14, 2026 [AFP]

O’Hanna was charged in May after a video emerged from the London concert in which he allegedly displayed the Hezbollah flag, an offence he has denied.

Kneecap previously said the flag was thrown on stage during their performance and that they “do not, and have never” supported Hezbollah.

The charge against O’Hanna was thrown out in September after a court ruled it had originally been brought without the permission of the director of public prosecutions and the attorney general, as well as one day outside the six-month statutory limit.

But CPS lawyer Paul Jarvis told London’s High Court on Wednesday that permission was only required by the time O’Hanna first appeared in court, meaning the case can proceed.

O’Hanna did not attend the hearing.

But his bandmate, JJ O Dochartaigh, better known by the stage name DJ Provai, was in court alongside the band’s manager, Dan Lambert, and its lawyers.

About 100 Kneecap supporters also turned up at the court to show their support, holding Irish and Palestinian flags, singing songs and listening to speeches.