Following a significant protest in the capital Sofia against the proposed tax increases, which led to clashes between police and demonstrators, Bulgaria’s government announced it is retracing a planned budget.
Published On 2 Dec 2025
The paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) claim that Babnusa, west of West Kordofan, is under the control of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).
Sudan’s military administration announced in a statement on Tuesday that it had resisted an RSF attack. The paramilitary group claimed the day before that West Kordofan, a significant city in central Sudan, was in complete control of Babnusa.
list of 3 itemsend of list
The paramilitary force took complete control of the Darfur region last month, and western Sudan at large via Babnusa.
Following a week-long siege, the RSF released videos showing its fighters removing an army base from Babnusa. The SAF maintained, however, that the city was still rife with fighting.
Our forces’ official statement read, “The RSF launched a new attack on the city, which our forces decisively rejected.”
Hiba Morgan from Khartoum reported on Al Jazeera’s Hiba Morgan that the army claimed that the battles are ongoing and that their soldiers are still residing there. However, “the RSF has taken control of that,” is what we can undoubtedly confirm.
She said that if the RSF regains control of Babnusa, it will “solidify its control over the West Kordofan region” and add “any major access ways to the western part of the country.”
According to Morgan, “Bombusa must pass for the Sudanese army to enter parts of Darfur or other parts of Kordofan,” making regaining control of Darfur even more difficult.
Other parts of Kordofan, including the southern region of Abbasiya Tagali, were reported to be experiencing ferocious clashes, according to Al Jazeera Arabic.
After capturing the city of el-Fasher, the army’s final holdout in Darfur, the RSF’s assault on Babnusa strengthens the group’s momentum.
Witnesses and international aid organizations on the ground have uncovered a large number of atrocities committed by the RSF. RSF militias are implicated in numerous murders, rapes, and kidnappings, according to evidence.
The RSF’s recent clashes also appear to have broken the unilateral ceasefire that was established following mediation between the “Quad” of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the US.
The SAF has accused the RSF of continuing its attacks despite its declared truce, rejecting the terms of the Quad’s proposed ceasefire.
The government described the announced ceasefire as “nothing but a political and media ploy intended to cover up] the Sudanese people’s ongoing Emirati support and field movements.”
The UAE has frequently been accused of providing money and weapons to the RSF, but it has vehemently refrained from participating.
According to analysts, the RSF will likely move towards el-Obeid in North Kordofan if Babnusa completely falls.
The political shockwave, according to Kholood Khair, the founding director of UK-based risk management company Confluence Advisory, will be sizable if the city falls.
It’s a significant economic triumph, a regional capital, and a huge mercantile center. Additionally, it brings Khartoum’s RSF a few steps closer.
In March, the RSF was ordered to leave the Sudanese capital, with the SAF’s appearance to be on the rise during the more than two-year conflict.
The tables are now, however, turning once more. The SAF now faces a threat of losing Kordofan, after completely losing Darfur with the fall of El-Fasher.
In recent days, tropical storms and heavy rain have caused devastating flooding and landslides in many parts of South and Southeast Asia, according to officials who claim more than 1,250 people have died in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand alone, and that many others are still missing.
The disaster, which left towns and villages buried under mud in Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Sumatra, is thought to have been caused by two cyclones and a typhoon, which are all different types of tropical storms. The recovery efforts are expected to last for weeks.
list of 4 itemsend of list
More than 1.1 million people were displaced by the flooding and landslides, which Sri Lanka has declared an emergency. The Disaster Management Centre’s director general, Sampath Kotuwegoda, stated to Al Jazeera that the nation is facing a “humanitarian crisis of historic proportions.”
The worst affected by the floods, according to Jessica Washington, who was based in Indonesia, where landslides have been reported all over North Sumatra province. From North Tapanuli, she said, “I have covered natural disasters, and typically there is an area where landslides are contained, but this time, landslides have affected all the villages we saw.”
What can be done to prevent future natural disasters, and what caused the record-setting floods and landslides?
Online search trends revealed that people were interested in the extreme weather that had caused some of the worst disasters in decades to occur simultaneously as the reports of the devastating floods began to spread.
Following weeks of heavy rains and deadly tropical storms, communities across South and Southeast Asia have been inundated in areas including Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
Tropical storms, such as Typhoon Koto, which caused severe flash floods and landslides in the Philippines, Cyclone Senyar, which severely affected Indonesia’s northern Sumatra, and Cyclone Ditwah, which severely devasted Sri Lanka, all contributed to the most recent floods.
According to Steve Turton, an adjunct professor of environmental geography at Central Queensland University in Australia, one thing that echoes throughout the region is that communities were battling to cope with the sheer volume of rainfall, which led to problems like landslides.
According to Turton, “There are tropical systems all over the world, whether you call them hurricanes, tropical cyclones, typhoons, or tropical cyclones,” they are producing more rain than they have ever produced. And climate change is the cause.
According to Turton, Cyclone Senyar, Cyclone Ditwah, and Typhoon Koto all produced “a lot of rain,” compared to Cyclone Senyar, Cyclone Ditwah, and Typhoon Koto, which were not considered severe storms due to their wind speeds.
He continued, “And that’s because the atmosphere and the ocean are warming up, which is causing these rainstorms.”
A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture and releases it in more intense bursts, according to Roxy Matthew Koll, a climate scientist at the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, and stronger rain bands form around tropical cyclones.
La Nina, a natural phenomenon that causes the Pacific Ocean to become warmer in the east and cooler in the west, results in stronger winds and warmer water and moisture for Asia.
According to Koll, this pattern frequently causes higher rainfall and flood risk in Asia, adding that it frequently causes this to build up.
Although the effects of more rain are well known, Turton points out that more thorough investigation will be required when investigating how Cyclone Senyar and Typhoon Koto might have interacted with other unusual events like this week’s storms, such as how Cyclone Senyar and Typhoon Koto may have interacted.
According to a recent attribution study conducted by the Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment, the use of the Imperial College Storm Model (IRIS) has already increased the amount of eyewall rain from Typhoon Fung-wong, which made landfall in the Philippines last month, by an estimated 10.5 percent.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto stated that the country’s citizens will have to “confront” climate change while traveling to disaster-affected communities in North Sumatra on Monday.
He argued that regional governments must also be prepared to deal with climate change’s effects.
The governments and cities have “failed at all to prepare,” according to Shweta Narayan, campaign lead at the Global Climate and Health Alliance, a group of health professionals and civil society organizations.
She said there is a “major disconnect” between the reality and policymakers’ blatant lack of knowledge. The price is being paid by the public, he said.
Many governments and climate change activists are eager to switch to more practical strategies to help as much as possible reduce the severity of the current and upcoming climate change-induced disasters that have been warning us for decades.
Harjeet Singh, a climate activist and Satat Sampada Climate Foundation founder, stated to Al Jazeera that the research on relating individual disasters to climate change is complete and that it is now time to move forward.
He claimed that “people in South and Southeast Asia are living the data,” stressing that the evidence should now lead to accountability.
He claimed that “we don’t need to wait for event-by-event attribution to realize that climate change is causing these impacts to grow in frequency and magnitude.”
According to Singh, “countries that grew wealthy by burning fossil fuels are legally and morally obligated to urgently provide grant-based finance” to aid nations in their response.”
The most recent storms occurred less than a week after Brazil’s United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) concluded, failing to provide the solutions that nations with climate change harms have repeatedly demanded.
According to Singh, this includes grant-based funding to assist them in coping with more urgent cuts to fossil fuel emissions as well as more expensive disasters, as opposed to loans, which add to their debts.
Countries with the worst of the climate, including island nations, are still looking for solutions to the crisis despite facing significant uphill battles.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the world’s supreme court, ruled earlier this year that states must immediately take action to combat the “existential threat” of climate change by cooperating to reduce emissions, implementing global climate agreements, and safeguarding fragile populations and ecosystems from harm.
In response to the case brought before the court by developing nations led by Vanuatu, ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa said, “Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system… may constitute an internationally wrongful act.”
The advisory opinion may have an impact on the growing number of international climate change lawsuits.
In addition to those legal challenges, survivors of the 2021 Super Typhoon Odette in the Philippines recently filed a lawsuit against British oil giant Shell for allegedly causing the climate crisis in court in the UK.
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies called for “urgent need for stronger legal and policy frameworks to protect people in disasters” on Monday.
The Asia-Pacific region’s director of the IFRC, Alexander Matheou, said in a statement that “climate-driven disasters are becoming the new normal” and that investment in resilience and preparedness is essential.
After two people survived the initial attack, the Trump administration is in the news that its military launched a second strike on a boat in the Caribbean Sea, which Washington claims was carrying drugs.
Two questions, one of which was at the heart of the controversy: Who authorized and was it legal to launch a second strike on the ship in September?
list of 3 itemsend of list
What we are aware of is:
During Operation Southern Spear, a major campaign that President Donald Trump claims is aimed at destroying drug-trafficking networks, the US military struck a boat in the Caribbean on September 2, 2025.
Nine people died and the vessel was completely destroyed by the first strike. Left to cling to the debris were two survivors.
According to The Washington Post, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal directive that the paper’s reporting described as “to kill everyone.”
Admiral Frank Bradley, the commander of the mission, then issued an additional strike that claimed the lives of the two survivors.
What is known as a “double tap” strike, which is understood in military jargon, is illegal according to experts. Democrats and several Republicans in Congress have voiced their opposition to the strikes, who have pledged to lead the investigation.
The Senate Armed Services Committee, which is led by Republicans, made the announcement on Friday that it would ensure “oversight” of the strikes. The committee’s chairs, Democratic Senator Jack Reed and Republican Senator Roger Wicker, both informed the committee of recent news reports and the Department of Defense’s initial response, according to a statement released by the committee. They said the Committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and “we will be conducting thorough oversight to ascertain the facts” in these circumstances.
Separately, the House Armed Services Committee requested “a full accounting of the operation in question.”
Congress’s committees have sought audio recordings and other sources of documentation to reconstruct the order’s implementation.
More than 80 people have been killed and more than 20 boats have been targeted by the US’s wider operation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean so far.
Hegseth described the report as “fake news” on social media, claiming that the boat strikes were “approved by the best military and civilian attorneys, up and down the chain of command” and “in compliance with the law of armed conflict.”
He also appeared to support the double strike.
Hegseth stated in a social media  post on Friday evening that the “declared intent is to stop lethal drugs, destroy narco-boats, and kill the narco-terrorists who are poisoning the American people.” Every trafficker we kill has a designated terrorist organization as its affiliation.
The Trump administration officially demonized the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua earlier this year as a terrorist organization. Additionally, it accused Venezuela’s president, Nicolas Maduro, of leading the Cartel de los Soles, which US officials described as a drug-smuggling network involving senior government and armed forces members.
In reality, Venezuelans refer to corrupt senior officials by a broad term, the Cartel de los Solos, rather than a cartel. Additionally, the US government’s own Drug Enforcement Agency names other nations as the main narcotics importers, not Venezuela. Tren de Aragua is a front for Maduro, according to Trump’s own intelligence agencies, which have established no connection between the gang and the president of Venezuela.
As per usual, fake news is bringing even more fabricated, incendiary, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors who fight to defend our country.
These extremely potent strikes, as we’ve already said, are specific to…
Trump said in response to questions posed on Air Force One on Sunday that his administration “will investigate” the reports of the second ship’s September 2 strike.
However, he continued, “I wouldn’t have wanted that; not a second strike.”
He noted that Hegseth claimed that he had not ordered those two men’s deaths.
US troops assisted in several of the nearly two dozen subsequent US military strikes on boats and repatriated them to their respective nations.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed Hegseth’s argument in justifying the second strike on September 2 in contrast to Trump’s statement.
“The strike on September 2 was carried out in self-defense to safeguard American interests. In response to a reporter’s question on Monday evening, she responded, “The strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance with the law of armed conflict.”
The White House stated on September 1st that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth authorized numerous strikes that resulted in the deaths of 11 people on a vessel from Venezuela that was allegedly carrying illegal narcotics. twitter.com/pMJkyAvt2E
Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to carry out the “strikes” on September 2, according to the White House, giving the impression that the mission commander was given the order to launch multiple attacks on the ship if necessary.
Leavitt told a press conference on Monday that Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to carry out these kinetic strikes.
Bradley’s decision to carry out the second strike, according to Leavitt.
“Admiral Bradley performed well within the bounds of the law and his authority. She said: “He directed the engagement to make sure the boat was completely destroyed and the threat of narco-terrorists to the United States was eliminated.”
A second strike, according to experts, was prohibited from killing survivors.
The Trump administration chose to be judge, jury, and executioner rather than having a criminal prosecution, according to Rachel VanLandingham, a military expert at Southwestern Law School, on their own claim that these individuals are having an extrajudicial killing or murder.
It’s a war crime to use that second strike against people who are shipwrecked and clinging desperately to the side of their boat wreckage. Because those shipwrecked have protected status under the law unless they, for example, shot a gun at someone, it constitutes a war crime. They are protected, she continued, but otherwise.