Iraq presidential vote delayed as Kurdish blocs struggle to pick candidate

The election for Iraq’s next president has been postponed in order for more consultation between the two Kurdish parties to come to a decision.

The Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) requested a delay in the parliamentary vote scheduled for Tuesday, according to the Iraqi News Agency (INA).

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

According to a sectarian quota system, the prime minister’s position is held by a Shia, the parliament’s speaker is a Sunni, and the presidency is largely ceremonial for Kurds.

A PUK member typically assumes the presidency in accordance with a deal reached between the two main Kurdish parties. The KDP selects the region’s president and regional leader, in contrast, from the region’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region.

However, the KDP chose Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein as the primary candidate in this instance.

Whoever is nominated by the two Kurdish parties still needs the support of the Shia and Sunni blocs in the parliament, according to Al Jazeera’s Mahmoud Abdelwahed, who is based in Baghdad.

The new president will have 15 days to choose a prime minister, presumably Nouri al-Maliki’s former leader, after the election.

Al-Maliki, 75, has previously served as Iraq’s prime minister for two terms, including two terms in 2006 and 2014. He abruptly resigned under American pressure. He is perceived as having ties to Iran.

Maliki was approved by the Coordination Framework, a coalition of Shia parties with a majority in parliament on Saturday. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned against an Iraqi pro-Iranian government the following day.

Washington “has conveyed to it a negative view of previous governments led by former prime minister Maliki,” according to an Iraqi source close to the coordination framework.

The United States will make its own sovereign decisions regarding the next government, according to US representatives in a letter.

Another Iraqi source confirmed the letter, noting that Maliki was confident that Washington’s concerns would be addressed by the Shia alliance, which had continued to advance with its decision.

Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ puts rights abusers in charge of global order

The Trump administration has worked diligently to undermine the UN, particularly its efforts to uphold universal human rights, since taking office a year ago. Donald Trump, the current US president, wants to form a “Board of Peace,” with himself as the chairman forever. While many nations were invited, those signing up appear to be a rogues’ gallery of leaders and governments with varying levels of appalling human rights records.

In order to stop another World War II crime against humanity and genocide, the United States was instrumental in founding the UN in 1945. The US has always had a love-hate relationship with the UN, always being wary of perceived threats to its autonomy. However, the Trump administration has criticized what it perceives as “anti-American” and “hostile agendas,” insisting on the hate and displacing the love.

Numerous vital UN programs have been ignored and underfunded by the administration. Additionally, a significant portion of the assessed contributions, which member states are required to pay, has been withheld. The administration has discontinued funding the UN population fund, which supports and defends women and girls in armed conflicts and crisis zones, and has withdrawn from the UN World Health Organization, UN climate bodies, and international climate agreements.

In UN negotiations, US negotiators have pushed Trump’s ideological agenda and demanded that some of the language used in statements and resolutions be removed. Because the Trump administration views them as “woke” or politically correct, the UN diplomats claim that targeted language includes words like “gender,” “diversity,” and “climate.” The administration has had a few successes with its ideological campaign in the UN Security Council, but it has had a difficult time in the General Assembly, where the US is one of 193 members without a veto and has had some success.

The administration appears to be determined to reincarnate the Security Council in a Trumpian manner, though. According to the proposed charter of the Board of Peace, it is “an international organization that seeks to promote stability, restore dependable and lawful governance, and ensure enduring peace in areas affected or threatened by conflict.”

The Russian and Chinese governments, which have worked tirelessly for years to de-emphasize human rights at the UN, are undoubtedly hearing something about human rights because the charter doesn’t mention them.

According to the $1 billion fee for permanent membership, Trump’s board appears to be a sort of pay-to-play, global club. It’s difficult to imagine this body prioritize ending suffering, hatred, and bloodshed, as Trump remarked at the World Economic Forum’s launch event on the sidelines of the forum. There are several well-known human rights abusers and leaders who have been linked to war crimes. Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, and Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, are two of the people Trump has invited to join. Both of them are facing international criminal court (ICC) arrest warrants for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Trump has invited leaders from China, Belarus, and Kazakhstan to his board, each with their own appalling human rights records.

According to the charter, Trump would have the power to “adopt resolutions or other directives” as chairman of the board.

Hungary and Bulgaria are the only European Union members who have so far ratified joining. Viktor Orban, Hungary’s far-right populist prime minister, has long supported Trump. Trump threatened to significantly raise French wine and champagne tariffs in response to French President Emmanuel Macron’s refusal to accept a position.

Trump also gave Canada a seat on the board that was a permanent one. However, he withdrew the offer following Davos speech by Prime Minister Mark Carney. Carney sharply criticised the use of economic coercion by great powers against smaller nations while not mentioning Trump or the US. Carney urged middle-class nations to unite and combat bullying from great powers.

Following an additional two years of Israeli forces’ atrocities that left at least 70, 000 Palestinians dead, with whom the US was associated, the Board of Peace was originally intended to be in charge of Gaza’s administration. Gaza is not mentioned in the board’s charter. However, Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, led a side event at Davos that focused on Gaza. The “Gaza Executive Board,” a subsidiary of the Board of Peace, will consist of Kissner.

Kushner gave the impression of a “New Gaza,” complete with glittering office buildings and pristine beaches crowded with people. Tony Blair, the Trump negotiator Steve Witkoff, and senior Türkish and Qatari officials make up the Gaza Executive Board, which is unoccupied.

Governments should collaborate to uphold international human rights, humanitarian law, the rule of law, and accountability rather than handing out $1 billion checks to Trump. They should use all available resources to combat unfair US actions, including Trump’s sanctions against prominent Palestinian human rights organizations, ICC judges, and UN special rapporteurs. They should demand answers from all warring parties, whether in Gaza, Sudan, Ukraine, Myanmar, or anywhere else.

Anything less would put Trump in danger of winning and would make it easier for him and his board to support the UN and other important international organizations. The UN has its issues, including those relating to the protection of human rights. However, it is still worthwhile to strengthen rather than to replace it with an allies of war criminals and rights violators.

Meta, TikTok and YouTube face landmark trial over youth addiction claims

The tech companies’ first ever jury arguments against their claims against their platforms, including YouTube, TikTok, and Meta, are set for a landmark trial in court.

The jury selection process is anticipated to last at least a few days as the case moves forward on Tuesday in Los Angeles County’s California Superior Court, where 75 potential jurors are questioned daily through at least Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

For thousands of other lawsuits seeking damages for social media harms, the trial is regarded as a test case. Snapchat’s parent company Snap Inc., the lawsuit’s fourth party, settled the matter last week for an undisclosed sum.

The trial, which will last six to eight weeks, is expected to feature executives including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

A Californian woman, identified as KGM, 19, claimed she became dependent on the company’s platforms when she was just a teenager. She asserts that this was accomplished by deliberate design choices made by businesses that wanted to increase revenue by making their platforms more enticing for children.

She claims that the apps caused her to have suicidal thoughts and feel depressed, and she is suing the companies for damages. This case, which the plaintiffs refer to as “social media addiction,” is the first to be tried in court this year.

According to the lawsuit, “Defendants deliberately integrated a range of design features into their products to maximize youth engagement to drive advertising revenue,” “using heavily from the behavioral and neurobiological techniques used by slot machines and exploited by the cigarette industry.”

According to experts, the Big Tobacco trials, which led to a 1998 settlement that forbids cigarette manufacturers from paying billions of dollars for medical expenses and restricts marketing to minors, are similar.

If successful, this argument could obstruct Section 230, which exempts tech companies from liability for content posted on their platforms, and the companies’ First Amendment shield.

The tech companies have employed attorneys who have represented businesses in well-known addiction cases.

They contest the claims that their products intentionally harm children, citing a number of safeguards they have added over the years, and contend that they are not responsible for third-party content posted on their websites.

At dozens of high schools across the US, Meta has sponsored parent workshops on teen online safety for at least the past two years. Additionally, TikTok sponsored other gatherings and provided tutorials on features, including the option to set a nighttime screen limit.

Mothers Against Media Addiction, the founder of the organization that supports smartphone bans in schools, reported to Reuters as saying tech companies were “using every lever of influence that you can imagine.”

Parents who are unsure of their faith can be very perplexed, she continued.

On Monday, the lower house in France approved a ban on using social media for children under the age of 15. Before a final vote in the lower house, the legislation will now pass to the Senate.

Why Japan’s economic plans are sending jitters through global markets

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s tax and spending pledges in advance of snap elections next month have sent jitters through global markets.

Japanese government bonds and the yen have been on a rollercoaster since Takaichi unveiled plans to pause the country’s consumption tax if her Liberal Democratic Party wins the February 8 vote.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The market turmoil reflects concerns about the long-term sustainability of Japan’s debt levels, which are the highest among advanced economies.

The volatility has extended beyond Japan, highlighting broader fiscal sustainability worries in an era in which the United States and other major economies are running huge deficits.

What has Takaichi promised on the economy?

Takaichi said last week that she would suspend the country’s 8 percent consumption tax on food and non-alcoholic beverages for two years if her government is returned to power, following her dissolution of the House of Representatives.

Based on Japanese government data, Takaichi’s plan would result in an estimated revenue shortfall of 5 trillion yen ($31.71bn) each year.

Takaichi, a proponent of predecessor Shinzo Abe’s agenda of high public spending and ultra-loose monetary policy, said the shortfall could be made up by reviewing existing expenditures and tax breaks, but did not provide specific details.

Takaichi’s tax pledge comes after her Cabinet in November approved Japan’s largest stimulus since the COVID-19 pandemic.

The package, worth 21.3 trillion yen ($137bn), included one-time cash handouts of 20,000 yen per child for families, subsidies for utility bills amounting to about 7,000 yen per household over a three-month period, and food coupons worth 3,000 yen per person.

Why have Takaichi’s pledges unnerved markets?

Japan’s long-term government bond yields soared following Takaichi’s announcement.

Yields on 40-year bonds rose above 4 percent on Tuesday, the highest on record, as investors exited from Japanese government debt en masse.

Bond markets, through which governments borrow money from investors in exchange for paying out a fixed rate of interest, are closely watched as a gauge of the health of countries’ balance sheets.

While typically offering lower returns than stocks, government bonds are seen as low-risk investments as they have the backing of the state, making them attractive to investors seeking safe places to park their money.

As confidence in a government’s ability to repay its debts declines, bond yields rise as investors seek higher interest payments for holding riskier debt.

“When Prime Minister Takaichi announced a planned reduction in consumption taxes, this made existing bond-holders of Japan’s debt uneasy, requiring a higher compensation for the risk they bear,” Anastassia Fedyk, an assistant professor of finance at the Haas School of Business of the University of California, Berkeley, told Al Jazeera.

“As a result, bond prices dropped and yields rose. And yes, this is a general pattern that applies to other countries, too, though Japan has an especially high level of debt, making its position more vulnerable.”

Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio already exceeds 230 percent, following decades of deficit spending by governments aiming to reverse the country’s long-term economic stagnation.

The East Asian country’s debt burden stands far above that of peers such as the US, UK and France, whose debt-to-GDP ratios are about 125 percent, 115 percent and 101 percent, respectively.

At the same time, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) has been scaling back bond purchases as part of its move away from decades of ultra-low interest rates, limiting its options for interventions to bring yields down.

“Bond investors reacted because her headline package looks like large, near-term fiscal loosening at exactly the moment the BOJ is trying to normalise policy,” Sayuri Shirai, a professor of economics at Keio University in Tokyo, told Al Jazeera.

How does all this affect the rest of the world?

The sell-off in Japanese bonds reverberated through markets overseas, with yields on 30-year US Treasuries rising to their highest level since September.

As Japanese bond yields rise, local investors are able to earn higher interest payments at home.

That can incentivise investors to offload other bonds, such as US Treasuries.

As of November, Japanese investors held $1.2 trillion in US Treasuries, more than any other foreign group of buyers.

In an interview with Fox News last week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed concern about the impact of Japan’s bond market on US Treasury prices and said he anticipated that his Japanese counterparts would “begin saying the things that will calm the market down.”

Japan’s long-term bond yields fell on Monday amid the expectations that Japanese and US authorities would step in to prop up the yen.

On Friday, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had inquired about the cost of exchanging the Japanese currency for US dollars.

“Japan matters globally through flows. If Japanese government bond yields rise, Japanese investors can earn more at home, potentially reducing demand for foreign bonds; that can nudge global yields and risk pricing,” Shirai said.

“This is why global-market pieces have framed Japan’s bond move as a wider rates story.”

Higher bond yields in Japan, the US and elsewhere raise the cost of borrowing and servicing the national debt.

In a worst-case scenario, a sharp escalation in interest rates can lead to a country defaulting on its debts.

Masahiko Loo, a fixed income strategist at State Street Investment Management in Tokyo, said that the reaction of international investors to Takaichi’s plans reflects growing sensitivity to fiscal credibility in highly indebted economies.

“Yes, Japan may be the spark, but the warning applies equally to the US and others with large structural deficits,” Loo told Al Jazeera.

Is Japan on the verge of a financial crisis?

Probably not.

While Japan is more indebted than its peers, its fiscal position is more sustainable than it might appear due to factors specific to the country – at least in the short to medium term – according to economists.

The vast majority of Japan’s debt is held by local institutions and denominated in yen, reducing the likelihood of a panic induced by foreign investors, while interest rates are far lower than in other economies.

“The debt situation is more manageable than a lot of people think,” Thomas Mathews, head of markets for Asia Pacific at Capital Economics, told Al Jazeera.

“Net debt-to-GDP is on a downward trajectory, and Japan’s budget deficit isn’t all that big by global standards.”

Loo of State Street Investment Management said that the turmoil surrounding Japan had more to do with a “communication gap around fiscal sustainability and policy coordination” than the country’s solvency.