FIFA Announces $355 Million World Cup Club Benefit Scheme

FIFA announced on Tuesday a $355 million (300 million euros) pay-out to clubs releasing players for next year’s World Cup – a 70 percent hike on the 2022 edition.

The new benefit scheme deal, reached in association with the powerful European Club Association (ECA), includes for the first time players involved in qualifiers but not figuring in the 48-team 2026 tournament, co-hosted by the USA, Canada and Mexico.

For the 32-team 2022 World Cup in Qatar, FIFA distributed $209 million to 440 sides “from 51 FIFA member associations”, football’s world governing body noted.

READ ALSO: FIFA Set To Kick Off 2026 World Cup Ticket Sales

“The enhanced edition of the FIFA Club Benefits Programme for the FIFA World Cup 2026 is going a step further by recognising financially the huge contribution that so many clubs and their players around the world make to the staging of both the qualifiers and the final tournament,” said FIFA president Gianni Infantino.

The Bolsonaro verdict shows Brazilian democracy is resilient

On Thursday, a Brazilian Supreme Court panel found former President Jair Bolsonaro guilty of multiple charges, including leading a criminal group and attempting the violent overthrow of democratic rule. He was sentenced to 27 years and three months in prison.

According to the prosecution, Bolsonaro and members of his cabinet and the military sought to orchestrate a coup after his electoral defeat in November 2022 and assassinate current president and political rival Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Brazil’s judiciary associated the former president’s actions with the events that led to the ransacking of the presidential palace, Congress and the Supreme Court in the capital Brasilia by his supporters in January 2023.

While the verdict was welcomed by other Latin American leaders like Colombian President Gustavo Petro and Chilean President Gabriel Boric, United States President Donald Trump’s administration, a staunch ally of Bolsonaro, swiftly condemned it. In the days leading up to the court panel’s verdict, Washington intensified pressure on Brazil’s government by imposing a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian goods and issuing personal sanctions against Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes under the Magnitsky Act, citing alleged human rights abuses.

But the Brazilian government and institutions were unshaken. Lula hailed the decision as “historic” and rejected US attempts of interference in Brazil’s internal affairs.

The verdict is indeed historic, not only because it marks the first time a Brazilian head of state was convicted on such charges but also because it demonstrates that despite Brazil’s tumultuous history, its democracy is a resilient, dynamic and adaptable system that works.

This may come as a surprise to some. After all, the country’s recent past reflects struggles with authoritarianism and repression. From the seven decades of imperial monarchy in the 19th century after independence from Portugal through the republican period, the revolution of 1930, the unstable parliamentarian regime, the military dictatorship during the Cold War and the impeachment of two presidents in the democratic era, Brazil could easily be labelled as an unstable and unpredictable state.

What is more, the country is situated in a region that has long known coups, dictatorships and authoritarianism, often backed or orchestrated by the US.

Brazil’s own military dictatorship was firmly supported by the US government. Washington encouraged and backed the military coup of 1964, which ushered in an era of bloody repression that would only end two decades later. And yet, the democratic system that followed proved resilient even when confronted with wrongdoing by political leaders.

In 1979, President Joao Baptista Figueiredo signed a law giving amnesty to both military personnel and opponents of the dictatorship in an attempt to pave the way for democratisation. It also served to cover up the military regime’s crimes and protect those responsible.

In 2021, Bolsonaro decided to break with this policy of amnesty for crimes against the state by signing legislation that criminalised coup attempts and attacks on democracy. It is this very provision that was used by the Supreme Court in its ruling against him.

This is not the only time Brazilian courts have used presidents’ own legislative agendas against them. In 2005 during Lula’s first term, the country was shaken by a major scandal of vote-buying in Congress. As part of his efforts to appease the public, the president enacted the Clean Record Law (Lei da Ficha Limpa) in 2010, which rendered any candidate convicted by a collective judicial body (more than one judge) ineligible to hold public office for eight years. In 2018, Lula himself was barred from running for president again under his own law due to a conviction for corruption.

But these are not the only examples of Brazilian democracy weathering political storms linked to its leaders. The country has been through two presidential impeachments without major shocks to the system. Right-wing President Fernando Collor (1990-1992) was removed from office due to corruption involving his campaign treasurer while left-wing President Dilma Rousseff (2011-2016) lost her position for manipulating the federal budget.

The removal of both leaders did not lead to institutional instability but instead paved the way for significant reforms. Among them are the Plano Real (Real Plan) of 1994, which finally brought inflation under control, and the labour reform of 2017, which established the primacy of employer-employee agreements over existing labour legislation.

Taken together, these examples show that Brazil’s political system derives institutional strength from the application of the rule of law across the ideological spectrum.

The Brazilian case calls for a reconsideration of the longstanding but inaccurate view that Latin America is a breeding ground for unstable and unpredictable democracies. It shows that institutions are functioning and demonstrate both modernity and adaptability.

Brazil thus offers a reference point for other democracies in the region and beyond.

Berthoumieu has biting ban cut to nine games

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Women’s Rugby World Cup semi-final: France v England

Venue: Ashton Gate, Bristol Date: Saturday 20 September Kick-off: 15:30 BST

France back row Axelle Berthoumieu has had her 12-match ban for biting reduced to nine after an appeal.

The 25-year-old bit Ireland’s Aoife Wafer in France’s World Cup quarter-final win on Sunday.

A disciplinary committee said Berthoumieu’s admission of guilt, clean disciplinary record, remorse and public apology were sufficient mitigation to reduce the ban.

She will miss Saturday’s semi-final against England and either the bronze match or the final on 27 September, plus a further seven domestic matches.

France second row and co-captain Manae Feleu will also miss the England tie after failing in her appeal against a suspension.

Feleu was handed a three-match ban – reduced to two if she completes tackle school – after being cited for a high tackle in the same match.

The 25-year-old admitted it was an illegal challenge but disputed that it was a red-card offence. However, the committee upheld the original decision.

The Berthoumieu bite occurred as Ireland won a penalty turnover in the second half of their 18-13 defeat by France at Sandy Park.

Ireland captain Sam Monaghan said she raised the incident with referee Aimee Barrett-Theron, but no action was taken during the match.

At the Independent Foul Play Review Committee (FPRC) hearing, it emerged the television match official could not determine “clear and obvious foul play” at the time.

The FPRC was able to reach its decision with the help of written evidence as well as all broadcast angles.

Related topics

  • Rugby Union

Bayern’s Kane Keen To Rekindle London Rivalry Against Chelsea

Bayern Munich striker Harry Kane said facing English opposition “makes me want to play better” ahead of Wednesday’s home Champions League opener against Chelsea.

Speaking to reporters in Munich on Tuesday, the 32-year-old former Spurs striker said his historic rivalry with Chelsea would add a little more spice to the showdown.

“The rivalry was a good rivalry, especially early in my Tottenham career in the (Mauricio) Pochettino era. We had a lot of good games, tough games against each other,” Kane said.

Bayern Munich’s Senegalese forward #11 Nicolas Jackson (C) takes part in a training session in Munich, southern Germany, on September 16, 2025, on the eve of the UEFA Champions League first round day 1 football match between FC Bayern Munich and Chelsea. (Photo by Alexandra BEIER / AFP)

Kane faced London rivals Chelsea 22 times in all competitions with Tottenham, winning seven times and scoring eight goals, before moving to Bayern in 2023.

READ ALSO: Serbia-Albania World Cup Qualifier Moved Over Security Fears

The England captain broke through for a maiden team trophy last season when Bayern won the Bundesliga but said he saved extra motivation for English sides.

“I think playing against Premier League opposition there’s always a little more expectation around the game. Maybe the Chelsea fans don’t like me as much and when we play Arsenal, maybe the Arsenal fans don’t like me as much.

This handout photo provided by German first division football club FC Bayern Munich and taken on September 16, 2025 shows Bayern Munich’s English forward #09 Harry Kane addressing a press conference in Munich, southern Germany, ahead of the team’s UEFA Champions League football match against Chelsea FC on September 17. (Photo by Handout / BAYERN MUNICH / AFP) 

“That makes me want to play better, that motivates me. There will be some familiar faces — all those things added together brings a little something special.”

Kane has scored 93 goals in 101 games in all competitions for Bayern and said he was surprised by his record since moving to Germany.

“I don’t think I expected it. I always back myself to score goals but I didn’t know how it would go.

“The style suits me well. I’ve got a lot of confidence right now and I’m physically and mentally strong.”

Kane rejected suggestions from club powerbroker Uli Hoeness that the six-time Champions League winners were underdogs in Europe this year.

“When you’re at a club like Bayern Munich, there’s an expectation to win the best competitions — and the Champions League especially.

“Ultimately, if we don’t win it, there’s always going to be a bit of disappointment so I wouldn’t say we’re underdogs.”

This summer, Bayern brought in Luis Diaz and Nicolas Jackson from the Premier League, the latter coming from Wednesday’s oppponents Chelsea.

The duo were two of the few players swimming against a tide of big-money signings moving to England from the Bundesliga.

Bayern coach Vincent Kompany on Tuesday repeated his concern about the imbalance.

“Obviously there’s a big financial gap between the Premier League and other leagues,” Kompany said.

“We have to think about how we solve that one day. The Bundesliga has a lot of talent and English sides have bought a lot of players from here.

“But tomorrow is not about Bundesliga versus Premier League.”

Superb Notts set up victory chance against Surrey

Rex Features
  • 99 Comments

Rothesay County Championship Division One, Kia Oval (day two)

Nottinghamshire 231: Fisher 5-61 & 219-8: Patterson-White 58; Fisher 5-57

Surrey 173: Burns 47; James 3-35, Tongue 3-43

Notts (3 pts) lead Surrey (3 pts) by 277 runs

An explosive 17-wicket second day at The Oval ended, remarkably, with Liam Patterson-White and Lyndon James producing the highest partnership of an absorbing low-scoring match to tilt the potential championship title decider Nottinghamshire’s way.

At 219-8 in their second innings, Notts are 277 runs ahead of Surrey and after Patterson-White fell for 58, the best individual score of the match so far, they saw Brett Hutton (23 not out) and Josh Tongue, unbeaten on 14, add more vital runs before the close.

Matt Fisher did his best to keep Surrey in the game with 5-57, removing James for an 84-ball 47 just before Patterson-White’s own brave knock ended, to complete a maiden career 10-wicket match haul following his opening day 5-61 in Notts’ first innings 231.

Surrey had earlier crumbled from 101-1 to 173 all out in the top-of-the-table match, a first innings deficit of 58, but Notts then slid to 89-6 second time around before batting conditions seemed to ease at last and Patterson-White and James put on 91 in 23 overs.

James’ runs completed a fine day’s work for the all-rounder, who had earlier picked up 3-35 as the Notts seam quartet rocked Surrey, who are chasing a fourth successive County Championship triumph.

Tongue also impressed with 3-43, as did Hutton (2-31) and Dillon Pennington (2-41) to earn Notts three bowling bonus points and deny Surrey a single batting point.

As a result, the two teams remain separated by just a single point – as they were before the game – as they continue the scrap for the 16 points available for a victory which may well decide who finishes the season as county champions after next week’s final round of matches.

Patterson-White faced 90 balls, pulling Tom Lawes for six and also hitting five fours, before Dan Worrall had him well held at second slip to leave Surrey to chase a fourth innings target likely to be around 300 – a stiff task on a pitch still giving the faster bowlers plenty of encouragement.

Notts’ second innings had begun badly with Worrall angling one through Ben Slater’s defences to bowl the left-hander for four, while Haseeb Hameed was leg-before for 14 to Fisher’s sixth ball.

Joe Clarke and Freddie McCann also went lbw to Fisher, for one and 11 respectively in the bowler’s next two overs, and it was 53-5 when Jack Haynes inside-edged the rampant Fisher on to his leg stump to go for 16.

Kyle Verreynne made 18 to help James rally Notts a little in a useful stand of 36 but the South Africa wicketkeeper looked distraught when adjudged caught behind off Worrall in the second over of the final session.

But then Patterson-White emerged at number eight to frustrate Surrey’s bowlers in alliance with James, with the day two action being watched by a crowd of almost 3,500 – taking the aggregate championship attendance at the Oval this season to 80,484, a 21st century record.

The first hour of the morning gave no hint of the carnage to come with Surrey captain Rory Burns and nightwatchman Lawes, resuming on 43-1, taking their second wicket partnership to 59 with few alarms.

The 33rd over of Surrey’s innings, however, lit the touchpaper for the resulting fireworks with Lawes initially extra cover driving and then pulling James’ medium pace for two fours in three balls to suggest that bat was finally getting on top of ball.

It was only a mirage because Lawes, on 22, then stretched out to drive James and only succeeded in lifting a comfortable catch to cover. And his dismissal was the beginning of a startling collapse which saw Surrey lose nine wickets for just 72 runs in 20 overs either side of lunch.

Burns went for a gritty 97-ball 47 in the next over, leg-before to Hutton, and five overs later Ben Foakes edged James behind. Dan Lawrence departed for a three-ball duck, in the next over, beaten twice by Hutton’s outswingers before giving a catch to mid on off a leading edge from an inswinger.

And it became three wickets in three overs when Ollie Pope, to his clear annoyance, nibbled at one from James and gave McCann a waist-high catch at second slip.

Pope’s dismissal for 11 left Surrey reeling at 129-6 and, soon after lunch, it got worse for the champions when Ryan Patel tried to play Tongue’s pace from the crease and was leg-before for four.

Tom Curran’s 11 was curtailed by Pennington’s nip-backer and another successful lbw appeal and the end of the innings was nigh when Gus Atkinson nicked an unplayable leg-cutter from Tongue to Verreynne.

Fisher offered a few quality strokes but on 13 edged Tongue to second slip but by tea no fewer than five top order Notts wickets had also tumbled as the game moved on at breakneck pace.

Related topics

  • Surrey
  • Nottinghamshire
  • County Cricket
  • Cricket