Tragic Race Across the World star’s final minutes detailed at inquest into death

Sam Gardiner, who starred in the BBC series alongside his mother Jo, died earlier this year after losing control of his VW Golf car in terrible weather on a busy road

Tragic Race Across the World star Sam Gardiner died when he lost control of his car while driving in “appalling” weather, an inquest into his death has heard.

The 24-year-old suffered a catastrophic head injury when his “high-powered” VW Golf veered off the northbound carriageway near Cheadle earlier this year. He had been driving on the A34 on Monday 26 May when his car left the road and rolled before landing on its side

An inquest at Manchester South Coroners Court has heard how Sam – who graced our screens on the BBC travel series with his mum Jo in 2020 – had been travelling home to celebrate his aunt’s birthday bash after working as a landscape gardener up in Scotland.

In a tribute, Coroner Christopher Morris said: “Sam was truly a remarkable person who lit up the lives of many…He loved his sport, he loved his cars, and he loved being outdoors. “He was one of life’s adventurers,” adding that he was “caring, generous, with a great spirit and a big heart”, reports the Manchester Evening News.

The court heard that witnesses saw Sam’s car “overtaking and undertaking” in heavy rain before it collided with the central reservation and left the road. Detective Constable Simon Venguedasalon, of Greater Manchester Police’s Serious Collision Investigation Unit, told the inquest: “Several witnesses said that Sam was undertaking and overtaking slow-moving vehicles.

“A lot of the witnesses had slowed down due to the lack of visibility and the standing water on the road. His driving was not consistent with the conditions at the time.” DC Venguedasalon revealed that there were defects or potholes on the road, and some of the grids were blocked, contributing to the wet road surface. However, there was no CCTV or dashcam footage of the incident.

He added: “Sam unfortunately wasn’t driving to the conditions of the road. Due to the lack of tread on the tyres he lost control on the carriageway due to speed. He unfortunately left the carriageway and the collision then occurred.”

Police Constable Adam Dixon, a forensic collision investigator at GMP, told the inquest the road surface was “very wet” due to “bad weather” and that the tyres on Sam’s car had insufficient tread depth, which was a likely contributing factor to the crash.

He couldn’t estimate the speed Sam was driving on the 50mph road, but Mr Morris concluded that he was driving at a “significant estimated speed”.

Dr Naisbitt, a consultant in intensive care at Salford Royal Hospital, told the court Sam was placed in an induced coma due to severe head injuries. Doctors concluded that “he had sustained a devastating head injury in the crash and that there was no realistic prospect of any meaningful recovery”.

Tragically, Sam passed away in hospital on May 29. His cause of death was ruled a devastating brain injury due to a road traffic crash. Concluding that Sam had died in a road traffic collision, Mr Morris said he had been “weaving in and out around traffic” in “appalling” weather conditions before he “struck a kerb on the central reservation”.

He further stated that both the ‘insufficient’ tyre tread depth and his manner of driving were significant factors in his loss of control of the vehicle. Sam’s adoptive mum Jo concurred that her son was “generous, big-hearted and caring”, adding that he had a passion for cars. She revealed he had “chopped the exhaust off” his VW Golf R to make it “really noisy”.

Sam appeared alongside his mum Jo in the 2020 series of the BBC show when they journeyed across South America. They were unable to compete in the final leg of the race after they ran out of money.

In a heartfelt tribute following Sam’s death in May, his parents Jo and Andrew expressed their devastation, stating: “Sam left us far too soon, and while words will never fully capture the light, joy and energy he brought into our lives, we hold on to the memories that made him so special.”

Sam’s parents said he was ‘adored by his family’ and described him as ‘loyal, funny and fiercely protective’. They added his time on the BBC show ‘opened Sam’s eyes to the wonder of adventure’. Jo Gardiner told the Manchester Evening News: “Following the inquest, we want to thank all the witnesses who stopped to help Sam and all the emergency services involved.

“Whilst we are heartbroken over the loss of Sam, the generosity of people towards helping others with FASD is inspiring.”

Article continues below

A JustGiving page, set up in his memory by his family to support National FASD (Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder), has already raised over £28,500.

Nicola McLean left bedbound by weight loss jabs after trying to combat vile trolling

Nicola McLean, who has always been open after suffering from anorexia and bulimia since she was 11, says online body-shaming abuse got too much and she took the jabs as a reaction

Former glamour model Nicola McLean has said the fat jabs she had in retaliation to online trolls left her seriously ill.

The mum of two, who appeared on Celebrity Big Brother in 2012 and again in 2017, has been married to former footballer Tom Williams since 2009. The couple have two children, Rocky, 18, and Striker, 14, – but she says she was left too unwell to care for them after being left bedbound.

With more and more people paying for the injections, she has spoken of her experience a few years ago. After being offered them for free by someone on Instagram, she suffered excruciating headaches and was unable to leave her room. She said yes after being hounded by low life social media users who bombarded her with body-shaming remarks.

READ MORE: Katie Price fans shocked after startling video shows dramatic weight lossREAD MORE: ‘I’m a wine connoisseur and this wine advent calendar is the best I’ve found’

Speaking about her experience to draw attention to the issues with the jobs, Nicola detailed what she went through and said: “Every morning I’d inject myself with it, but after about a week of using it, I started to feel really ill. I was violently sick, and Tom was like, ‘That is so odd for you’.

“I have got the strongest stomach you’ll ever know from being bulimic for years,” she told The Sun. “Then I started getting headaches, but I brushed those off. Tom kept saying, ‘It’s this skinny jab, ’ but I would brush him off, too. I was obviously in denial. My weight was more important to me.”

Nicola has been open about the cosmetic procedures she has had, including three boob jobs taking her to a 32GG. Admitting this made it more difficult for her to keep on top of checking her breasts. The 43-year-old discovered a lump there last November and admits she automatically thought the worst.

Nicola candidly says, “I found a lump on my breast while I was moisturising and immediately I broke down in tears and thought, ‘What if it’s cancer?’ “Straight away I thought, ‘I’m going to die,’” continues Nicola, who has suffered with severe anxiety for several years. “Something like this makes my mind go into overdrive. As someone who has anxiety anyway, this was just awful.”

While she informed her husband straight away after finding the lump, Nicola says she couldn’t face telling their sons. “Tom was amazing – he’s so supportive and we talk about everything. He’s the calm one and was telling me, ‘We don’t know what it is yet,’ and being really rational.

“I didn’t tell the kids. I would never tell the kids something like this – I wouldn’t want to worry them. They know I have anxiety, and I’ll tell them when I’m feeling anxious because I think it’s good to talk about it, but I’d never worry them with something like this.”

Thankfully, doctors confirmed that the lump was benign and not cancerous, something Nicola was more than relieved to hear. “I went to the GP, who referred me to the cancer unit. They were great – really quick with everything,” she told the Mirror.

“It was a massive relief. But being referred to a cancer unit is scary in itself. The doctor said if the lump had been larger than 4cm it would have had to be removed, but it wasn’t, thankfully.”

Following the traumatising experience, Nicola says she’s feeling grateful for her health and looking forward to the year ahead. “I feel a good energy this year. I’m feeling really positive and happy at the moment. I think it’s going to be a good year and I’m ready to face everything head on now.”

*For help and support on eating disorders contact Beat Eating Disorders on 0808 801 0677.

Article continues below

Trump’s 100% tariff threat: History of US trade measures against China

China has accused the United States of “double standards” after US President Donald Trump threatened to impose an additional 100 percent tariff on Chinese goods in response to Beijing’s curbs on exports of rare earth minerals.

China says its export control measures announced last week were in response to the US restrictions on its entities and targeting of Beijing’s maritime, logistics and shipbuilding industries.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Trump’s tariff threats, which come weeks ahead of the likely meeting between the US president and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, have the potential to reignite a trade war months after Washington lowered the China tariffs from 125 to 30 percent.

The actions by the world’s two largest economies threaten to ignite a new trade war, adding further uncertainty to global trade. So what’s the recent history of US trade measures against China, and will the two countries be able to resolve their differences?

Why did China tighten export controls on rare earths?

On October 9, China expanded export controls to cover 12 out of 17 rare-earth metals and certain refining equipment, effective December 1, after accusing Washington of harming China’s interests and undermining “the atmosphere of bilateral economic and trade talks”.

China also placed restrictions on the export of specialist technological equipment used to refine rare-earth metals on Thursday.

Beijing justified its measures, accusing Washington of imposing a series of trade curbs on Chinese entities despite the two sides being engaged in trade talks, with the last one taking place in Madrid, Spain last month.

Foreign companies now need Beijing’s approval to export products containing Chinese rare earths, and must disclose their intended use. China said the heightened restrictions come as a result of national security interests.

China has a near monopoly over rare earths, critical for the manufacture of technology such as electric cars, smartphones, semiconductors and weapons.

The US is a major consumer of Chinese rare earths, which are crucial for the US defence industry.

At the end of this month, Trump and Xi are expected to meet in South Korea, and experts speculate that Beijing’s move was to gain bargaining advantage in trade negotiations with Washington.

China’s tightening of restrictions on rare earths is “pre-meeting choreography” before Trump’s meeting with Xi, Kristin Vekasi, the Mansfield chair of Japan and Indo-Pacific Affairs at the University of Montana, told Al Jazeera.

How did Trump respond?

On October 10, Trump announced the imposition of a 100 percent tariff on China, effective from November 1.

“Based on the fact that China has taken this unprecedented position … the United States of America will impose a Tariff of 100 percent on China, over and above any Tariff that they are currently paying,” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform.

He added that this would come into effect on November 1 or before that. Trump added that the US would also impose export controls on “any and all critical software”.

Earlier on October 10, Trump accused China of “trade hostility” and even said he might scrap his meeting with Xi. It is unclear at this point whether the meeting will take place.

“What the United States has is we have a lot of leverage, and my hope, and I know the president’s hope, is that we don’t have to use that leverage,” US Vice President JD Vance told Fox News on Sunday.

How did China respond to that?

China deemed the US retaliation a “double standard”, according to remarks by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce spokesperson on Sunday.

China said that Washington had “overstretched the concept of national security, abused export control measures” and “adopted discriminatory practices against China”.

“We are living in an era of deeper intertwining of security and economic policies. Both the US and China have expanded their conceptions of national security, encompassing a range of economic activities,” Manoj Kewalramani, chairperson of the Indo-Pacific Studies Programme at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, India, told Al Jazeera.

“Both have also weaponised economic interdependence with each other and third parties. There are, in other words, no saints in this game.”

Kewalramani said that China started expanding the idea of “national security” much earlier than others, especially with its “comprehensive national security concept” introduced in 2014.

Through this, China began to include many different areas, such as economics, technology, and society, under the term “national security”. This shows that China was ahead of other countries in broadening what counts as a national security issue.

China threatened additional measures if Trump went ahead with his pledge.

“Willful threats of high tariffs are not the right way to get along with China. China’s position on the trade war is consistent: we do not want it, but we are not afraid of it,” the Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said in a statement.

“Should the US persist in its course, China will resolutely take corresponding measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” the statement said.

What trade measures has the US taken against China in recent history?

2025: Trump unleashes tariff war

A month after taking office for his second term, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 10 percent tariff on all imports from China, citing a trade deficit in favour of China. In this order, he also imposed tariffs on Mexico and Canada. China levied countermeasures, imposing duties on US products in retaliation.

In March, the US president doubled the tariff on all Chinese products to 20 percent as of March 4. China imposed a 15 percent tariff on a range of US farm exports in retaliation; these took effect on March 10.

Trump announced his “reciprocal tariffs,” imposing a 34 percent tariff on Chinese products. China retaliated, also announcing a 34 percent tariff on US products. This was the first time China announced export controls on rare earths.

Hours after the reciprocal tariffs went into effect, Trump paused them for all his tariff targets except China. The US and China continued to hike tit-for-tat levies on each other.

Trump slapped 145 percent tariffs on Chinese imports, prompting China to hit back with 125 percent tariffs. Washington and Beijing later cut tariffs to 30 percent and 10 percent, respectively, in May, then agreed to a 90-day truce in August for trade talks. The truce has been extended twice.

December 2024: The microchip controls are tightened

In December 2024, Trump’s predecessor, former US President Joe Biden, tightened controls on the sale of microchips first introduced on October 2022.

Under the new controls, 140 companies from China, Japan, South Korea and Singapore were added to a list of restricted entities. The US also banned more advanced chip-making equipment to certain countries. Even products manufactured abroad with US technology were restricted.

April 2024: Biden signs the TikTok ban

Biden signed a bill into law that would ban TikTok unless it was sold to a non-Chinese buyer within a year. The US government alleged that TikTok’s Chinese parent company ByteDance was linked to the Chinese government, making the app a threat to national security.

ByteDance sued the US federal government over this bill in May 2024.

In September this year, Trump announced that a deal was finalised to find a new owner of TikTok.

October 2023: Biden introduces more restrictions on chips

In October 2023, Biden restricted US exports of advanced computer chips, especially those made by Nvidia, to China and other countries.

The goal of this measure was to limit China’s access to “advanced semiconductors that could fuel breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and sophisticated computers that are critical to [Chinese] military applications,” Gina Raimondo, who was secretary of the US Department of Commerce during the Biden administration, told reporters.

Prior to this, Biden signed an executive order in August 2023, creating a programme that limits US investments in certain high-tech areas, including semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence, in countries deemed to be a security risk, like China.

October 2022: Biden restricts Chinese access to semiconductors

Biden restricted China’s access to US semiconductors in October 2022. The rules further expanded restrictions on chipmaking tools to include industries that support the semiconductor supply chain, blocking both access to American expertise and the essential components used in manufacturing the tools that produce microchips.

Semiconductors are used in the manufacturing of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The US government placed these restrictions back then to limit China’s ability to acquire the ability to produce semiconductors and advance in the technological race.

The restrictions made it compulsory for entities within China to apply for licences to acquire American semiconductors. Analysis by the US-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace described these licences as “hard to get” back then.

Recently, some US lawmakers are calling for even more restrictions, warning that China could quickly reverse-engineer advanced semiconductor technologies on its own, outpace the US in the sector, and gain a military edge.

May 2020: Trump cracks down on Huawei

In May 2020, the US Bureau of Industry and Security intensified rules to stop Huawei, the Chinese tech giant, from using American technology and software to design and make semiconductors in other countries.

The new rules said that semiconductors are designed for Huawei using US technology or equipment, anywhere in the world, would need US government approval before being sent to Huawei.

May 2019: Trump bans Huawei

Trump signed an executive order blocking Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei from selling equipment in the US. The Shenzhen-based Huawei is the world’s largest provider of 5G networks, according to analysis by the New York City-based think tank the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Under this order, Huawei and 114 related entities were added to a list that requires US companies to get special permission (a licence) before selling certain technologies to them.

The rationale behind this order was the allegation that Huawei threatened US national security, had stolen intellectual property and could commit cyber espionage. Some US lawmakers alleged that the Chinese government was using Huawei to spy on Americans. The US did not publicise any evidence to back these allegations.

Other Western countries had also cooperated with the US.

March 2018: Trump imposes tariffs on China

During his first administration, Trump imposed sweeping 25 percent tariffs on Chinese goods worth as much as $60bn. In June of 2018, Trump announced more tariffs.

China retaliated by imposing tariffs on US products. Beijing deemed Trump’s trade policies “trade bullyism practices”, according to an official white paper, as reported by Xinhua news agency.

In September 2018, Trump issued another round of 10 percent tariffs on Chinese products, which were hiked to 25 percent in May 2019.

During the Obama administration (2009-2017)

In 2011, during US President Barack Obama’s tenure, the US-China trade deficit reached an all-time high of $295.5bn, up from $273.1bn in the previous year.

In March 2012, the US, European Union, and Japan formally complained to China at the World Trade Organization (WTO) about China’s limits on selling rare earth metals to other countries. This move was deemed “rash and unfair” by China.

In its ruling, the world trade body said China’s export restraints were breaching the WTO rules.

In 2014, the US indicted five Chinese nationals with alleged ties to China’s People’s Liberation Army. They were charged with stealing trade technology from American companies.

What’s next for the US-China trade war?

Trump and Xi are expected to meet in South Korea on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), which is set to begin on October 31.

But the latest trade dispute has clouded the Xi-Trump meeting.

On Sunday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, downplaying the threat: “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine! Highly respected President Xi just had a bad moment. He doesn’t want Depression for his country, and neither do I. The U.S.A. wants to help China, not hurt it!!!”

In an interview with Fox Business Network on Monday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, “President Trump said that the tariffs would not go into effect until November 1. He will be meeting with [Communist] Party Chair Xi in [South] Korea. I believe that meeting will still be on.”

When it comes to which of the two players is more affected by the trade war, Kewalramani said that he thinks “what matters is who is willing to bear greater pain, endure greater cost”.

“This is the crucial question. I would wager that Beijing is probably better placed because Washington has alienated allies and partners with its policies since January. But then, China’s growing export controls are not simply aimed at the US. They impact every country. So Beijing has not also endeared itself to anyone,” Kewalramani said, pointing out how Trump’s tariffs and China’s rare earth restrictions target multiple countries.

“The ones affected the most are countries caught in the midst of great power competition.”

On Sunday, US VP Vance told Fox News about China: “If they respond in a highly aggressive manner, I guarantee you, the president of the United States has far more cards than the People’s Republic of China.”

Kewalramani said that so far, Beijing has been more organised, prepared and strategic than the US in its policies.

ASUU: FG Imposes No-Work-No-Pay Rule On Striking Lecturers

The Federal Government has imposed the no-work, no-pay policy on striking members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

This was contained in a circular dated October 13 and signed by the Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa.

Alausa expressed the Federal Government’s displeasure with ASUU’s decision to embark on a nationwide strike despite ongoing negotiations and calls for dialogue.

He, therefore, directed vice-chancellors of federal universities to implement the no-work, no-pay policy against ASUU members participating in the ongoing nationwide strike.

“In line with extant provisions of the labour laws, the Federal Government reiterates its position on the enforcement of the ‘no-work, no-pay’ policy in respect of any employee who fails to discharge his or her official duties during the period of strike action,” the letter partly read.

Roll-Call Of Workers

He said academic workers who are members of the Congress of University Academics (CONUA) and the National Association of Medical and Dental Academics (NAMDA), not participating in the strike, were exempted from this directive.

READ ALSO: We’ve Addressed Every Request By ASUU, There’s No Need For Strike — FG

“Ensure that salary payment for the period of work stoppage is withheld from those who fail to perform their duties,” he added.

The minister said the NUC had been instructed to monitor compliance and submit a consolidated report to the ministry within seven days.

ASUU had on Sunday declared a two-week warning strike starting from October 13.

The lecturers have been at loggerheads with the government over the work conditions of lecturers, the 2009 FGN-ASUU agreement, the release of withheld salaries, and sustainable funding for the revitalisation of public universities.

Brian May supported by fans as he makes sad death announcement

Queen icon Brian May was flooded with support after sharing a message remembering a friend who was the “kindest man” he met and died after a sudden heart attack

Brian May has opened up about how hard it was to lose one of his dearest friends, who died of a sudden heart attack two years ago. The Queen guitarist took to social media to pay tribute to Phil Webb, who had been his driver and the “kindest man” he ever met.

Phil died in 2023 after suffering from a heart attack. He had known Brian for decades and at the time, the guitarist said the day Phil died was the “saddest day of his life”.

Now, Brian has opened up about losing his friend. He posted a picture of the two of them to Instagram and wrote in the caption: “In my thoughts today, the unforgettable Phil Webb.

READ MORE: Freddie Mercury’s secret daughter breaks silence with confession ahead of tell-all bookREAD MORE: Live Aid founder’s rallying call 40 years on from iconic concert – ‘It’s up to you now’

“Seen here with me, proudly looking after me as he always did, at my knighthood ceremony at Buckingham Palace. HE was suddenly taken from this world two years ago, way, way too soon.

“He was the kindest man I ever met, to ever man, woman and child, no matter what their colour or creed, and a passionate champion of animals, all of which makes him, to me, one of the greats. We all miss ya Phil, too much. RIP.”

Fans flooded the comments with words of support. One agreed that Phil was “such a kind man” and would be “dearly missed”. Another said they were sending “extra love” to all the people who had been close to the driver.

At the time of Phil’s death, Brian announced it in a statement, where he called the day the “saddest” of his life. The statement read: “This is one of the saddest days of my life. Last night we lost Phil Webb to a heart attack.

“Phil, my dedicated driver for over 30 years was my family’s dearest friend and protector and the kindest and most decent man I have ever had the pleasure to meet.

“We are all devastated and join with Phil’s wife and son in grieving for the last man on Earth to deserve this much too early passing away.

“Bless you dear Phil – we all love you. We’re proud of the life you led, and forever grateful for everything you gave us – more than any words could ever describe.”

Article continues below

Brian was one of the founding members of Queen. With hits such as We Are The Champions and Another One Bites The Dust, the band are one of the most iconic British bands in history. The other members were Freddie Mercury, who died in 1991, John Deacon and Roger Taylor.

Matt Tolfrey dead: Top DJ and music producer dies at 44 as emotional friend leads tributes

DJ and music producer Matt Tolfrey has died at the age of 44. The DJ and producer was also the founder of Leftroom Records and was known around the music circuit for his DJ and production skills.

His friend Damian Lazarus took to social media to share the news, writing: “This weekend we lost a key member of the extended Crosstown Rebels family. Matt Tolfrey played a major role in our music scene and will be very sorely missed.

“We first met in Nottingham when I was booked to play at Stealth and we went on to work and play together for the best part of 20 years. He produced key singles and remixes for us and in recent years was responsible for helping us work with artists that he represented such as @alinkatwirl @jadenthompson_ @ajchristou & @holaguti.”

He added: “Like us, Matt believed in community and bringing people together on and off the dancefloor and his record label @leftroomrecords has played an important role in bringing like minded music makers together. Matt was a brilliant DJ and was represented by myself and Will in the very early days of the Rebel Agency (now NGE).






Matt has died aged 44
(
instagram/matttolfrey)

“His cheeky smile and humour will be sorely missed. My heart goes out to everyone that knew and loved Matt but especially to his beautiful daughters Arla and Beau. RIP Matt, you left the room too early.”

The artist’s cause of death has not been disclosed. Matt was born in 1980 and began his career as a DJ in the early 2000s on Nottingham’s underground scene.

He quickly caught the attention of James Baillie, the legendary promoter behind Venus and the Lovebox Festival. After a breakout warm-up set for Craig Richards at The Bomb, Matt earned a coveted debut at London nightclub fabric in May 2004. That night went on to shape the rest of his career.

Matt went on to become a regular fixture in the UK and international house and techno scenes. He released music through major imprints such as Crosstown Rebels, REKIDS, and Phonica, before launching his own label, Leftroom Records, in 2005.

Tributes have flooded in for Matt, with one writing: “He was such a sweet warm soul . It’s so sad. I feel we are loosing so many people from our community lately.” Another added: “So incredibly sad to hear this. Matt was a real one and always enjoyed our chats.”

A third penned: “Absolutely devastating, our thoughts are with his family and close friends. Truly one of the best.”

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs onTikTok,Snapchat,Instagram,Twitter,Facebook,YouTubeandThreads.