HIV Prevention: Condom Distribution In Nigeria Falls By 55% — UNAIDS

According to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the distribution of condoms for the disease’s prevention in Nigeria has decreased by 55% from last December to March this year.

What the organization described as widespread disruptions to prevention, testing, and community-based programs across dozens of nations is illustrated by the figure, which was made public on Tuesday in the UNAIDS’ 2025 World AIDS Day report, Overcoming Disruption, Transforming the AIDS Response.

Due to the cuts to global programs since Donald Trump’s return to the White House, an uncountable number of additional people have died from AIDS, and 2.5 million have lost access to medication to stop the spread of HIV.

In a report released by UNAIDS, persistent funding shortfalls and the risky risks posed by the global HIV response have profound, long-lasting effects on the health and well-being of millions of people worldwide.

The impact was “immediate and severe” for countries like Nigeria, which is crucial for funding prevention infrastructure.

According to the report, UNAIDS’ community partners reported deaths of HIV-positive individuals who had been affected by local clinics and treatments, but it is unclear how many more deaths were brought on because data collection was still being done.

The United States, which contributed 75% of all global HIV funding, abruptly stopped all funding for HIV-related causes earlier in the year, according to UNAIDS, which was the catalyst for the global AIDS response.

Other donor countries have drastically reduced their foreign aid this year, including those in Europe, which have been pressed by Trump to instead increase defense spending.

Despite funding for some HIV programs that were previously funded by a U.S. program known as PEPFAR, UNAIDS, overall funding is still declining, putting in doubt 2030’s goals to end AIDS as a public health threat, according to UNAIDS.

READ MORE: UK to unveils tax-raising budget

Winnie Byanyima, the executive director of UNAIDS, stated to reporters in Geneva that her organization was working with at least 30 nations to reduce their dependence on international donors. She claimed that there are still significant challenges to overcome and that the funding gap cannot be closed right away.

According to the U.N. agency, there are 40.8 million HIV-positive people living, and 1.3 million new cases were identified in 2024.

In medical training and testing, the invention may lessen the need for cadavers and animals.

In October 2025, donors’ funding gaps reportedly caused 2.5 million people to lose access to the PrEP preventive HIV medication. According to Byanyima, Burundi’s distribution of preventive HIV medications decreased by 31%, 21%, and 64%.

Nearly half of women and adolescent girls reported interruptions to HIV prevention and treatment services in their communities, according to a survey conducted this year by UNAIDS and the ATHENA Network, a women’s rights organization.

In contrast to 2010, there were only 39% fewer people in the world who contracted HIV, with sub-Saharan Africa experiencing the greatest decline (56%).

However, an estimated 1.3 million [1 / 1.0 million / 1.7 million] people became HIV in 2023, which is more than the 370, 000 or fewer new infections that were targeted in 2025.

Condom programs have been defunded and social marketing initiatives have been reduced in many countries, but condom use continues to be the most cost-effective low-cost HIV prevention method. According to household survey data, condom use has decreased in recent years, particularly among young people between the ages of 15 and 24 and is not as frequent during sex with non-regular partners.

“A condom was used at the last sex by 36% of adults in eastern and southern Africa and 25% in western and central Africa.”

The HIV response is being hampered by a growing funding gap.

In 2023, low- and middle-income countries had funding for HIV programs worth almost US $ 9.8 billion (2019 United States dollars), which is almost US $ 9.9 billion less than the amount needed in 2025.

The total HIV resources available are at their lowest level in more than ten years, inflation-adjusted.

Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa are the countries that are preventing HIV epidemics the most.

The majority of HIV funding comes from domestic sources (roughly 59%), but stress exists for both domestic and international funding.

Domestic HIV funding decreased for the fourth year in a row in 2023, and international resources were almost 20% less than they did in 2013 when inflation was adjusted for inflation.

The amount of funding provided by bilateral donors has drastically decreased. Without continued, substantial funding from the United States Government and the Global Fund to Combat AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, the overall reductions in external HIV resources would be much greater.

HIV development assistance will continue to be a significant priority. The HIV response is still underfunded, despite societal enabler programs, and community-led initiatives.

“People from important populations are especially neglected,” according to the report, “even in areas where the vast majority of new HIV infections are spread by people from these populations.”

In contrast to the US $ 9.5 billion that will be required in 2025, USAID estimated that between US $ 1.8 billion and US $ 2.4 billion were available for primary prevention programs in low- and middle-income countries in 2023.

UNAIDS urged world leaders to reiterate their political and financial commitments to ending AIDS, citing commitments made at the most recent G20 summit in South Africa.

India suffer heaviest defeat as South Africa complete series sweep

Images courtesy of Getty

Guwahati, day five of the fifth test

South Africa 489 (Muthusamy 109, Yadav 4-115) &amp, 260-5d (Stubbs 94, Jadeja 4-62)

India 201 (Jaiswal 58, Jansen 6-48) &amp, 140 (Jadeja 54, Harmer 6-37)

South Africa wins by 408 runs.

South Africa completed a potent 2-0 series sweep in Guwahati on Wednesday, defeating India by one run, taking their heaviest defeat.

In the second Test, the Proteas won by 408 runs, clinching their first series victory since 2000 under Hansie Cronje.

India’s previous heaviest loss, 342 runs versus Australia in Nagpur in 2004, is now overshadowed by this defeat.

On day four, South Africa had declared their second innings a record-chasing 549-5.

However, on the final day of the match, the visitors’ final day of 63. 5 overs saw them defeat India by 140 runs. Ravindra Jadeja was the only one to counteract India with 54.

Aiden Markram made nine catches for the record while Simon Harmer, a spinner, took six wickets for South Africa.

Afterward, Markram remarked, “It’s a great feeling, a great effort by everyone to be fair.”

You’ve got to think as a group that you can compete with the best in their backyard, enter the fray, and watch the team win,” the team said.

South Africa, the reigning world champion of the two-test series, defeated by 30 runs in Kolkata’s opener.

related subjects

  • Cricket

More on this story.

    • August 16
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

India suffer heaviest defeat as South Africa complete series sweep

Images courtesy of Getty

Guwahati, day five of the fifth test

South Africa 489 (Muthusamy 109, Yadav 4-115) &amp, 260-5d (Stubbs 94, Jadeja 4-62)

India 201 (Jaiswal 58, Jansen 6-48) &amp, 140 (Jadeja 54, Harmer 6-37)

South Africa wins by 408 runs.

South Africa completed a potent 2-0 series sweep in Guwahati on Wednesday, defeating India by one run, taking their heaviest defeat.

In the second Test, the Proteas won by 408 runs, clinching their first series victory since 2000 under Hansie Cronje.

India’s previous heaviest loss, 342 runs versus Australia in Nagpur in 2004, is now overshadowed by this defeat.

On day four, South Africa had declared their second innings a record-chasing 549-5.

However, on the final day of the match, the visitors’ final day of 63. 5 overs saw them defeat India by 140 runs. Ravindra Jadeja was the only one to counteract India with 54.

Aiden Markram made nine catches for the record while Simon Harmer, a spinner, took six wickets for South Africa.

Afterward, Markram remarked, “It’s a great feeling, a great effort by everyone to be fair.”

You’ve got to think as a group that you can compete with the best in their backyard, enter the fray, and watch the team win,” the team said.

South Africa, the reigning world champion of the two-test series, defeated by 30 runs in Kolkata’s opener.

related subjects

  • Cricket

More on this story.

    • August 16
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

South Africa hammer India by 408 runs to complete historic clean sweep

Images courtesy of Getty

Guwahati, day five of the fifth test

South Africa 489 (Muthusamy 109, Yadav 4-115) &amp, 260-5d (Stubbs 94, Jadeja 4-62)

India 201 (Jaiswal 58, Jansen 6-48) &amp, 140 (Jadeja 54, Harmer 6-37)

South Africa wins by 408 runs.

South Africa completed a potent 2-0 series sweep in Guwahati on Wednesday, defeating India by one run, taking their heaviest defeat.

In the second Test, the Proteas won by 408 runs, clinching their first series victory since 2000 under Hansie Cronje.

India’s previous heaviest loss, 342 runs versus Australia in Nagpur in 2004, is now overshadowed by this defeat.

After losing to New Zealand by a 3-0 margin last year, India has lost its second home series. prior to that they had won a 12-year Test series on their own soil.

Gautam Gambhir, India’s head coach, said that “four or five batters in this top eight have played figuratively less than 15 test matches.”

They are learning while working, and they will grow. On the job, they are acquiring knowledge. When playing against a top-notch team, test cricket is never simple. You must also allow them time, as you know, because this is what transition is all about.

On day four, South Africa had declared their second innings a record-chasing 549-5.

However, on the final day, the visitors’ only countermeasure was Ravindra Jadeja’s 140 against India, who had beaten them for it in 63.5 overs.

“It’s a great feeling, everyone makes a great effort to be fair,” Markram said.

You’ve got to think as a group that you can compete with the best in their backyard, enter the fray, and watch the team win,” the team said.

With the victory, South Africa, who defeated Australia at Lord’s in June to become World Test Champions, has won 11 of their 12 matches under Temba Bavuma’s leadership.

India’s aura is “distant from the sky.”

Gambhir is put under more pressure as a result.

India have won seven Tests but lost ten since the former batter took over in July 2024.

Add to the defeats suffered by New Zealand and South Africa, who lost 3-1 in Australia last December and January, and Gambhir’s side drew 2-2 in England in the summer.

In addition to being ranked ninth and eighth, respectively, in the International Cricket Council’s Test rankings, their two series victories came in Bangladesh and at home to West Indies.

When asked what his future holds, Gambhir responded, “Indian cricket is important, I’m not important.

I’m the same person who led the team in England, and people keep forgetting about it. with a young team. And I’m the same person who also won the Asia Cup and the Champions Trophy.

Although commentator Harsha Bhogle wrote on X that “the Indian team had an aura around them when they were playing in India,” the approach and setup has been questioned. In the distance, you can see it vanish.

There are a lot of opening positions for this Indian Test team. Some players aren’t up to this level. How many others have finished, exactly?

Venkatesh Prasad, a former India bowler who played 33 Test matches between 1996 and 2001, claimed that India used “rank poor tactics.”

“Really disappointed by the way that India plays in their Test matches. When you don’t bowl them, the all-rounder obsession is “absolutely brain-fade,” Prasad said on X.

“An unprecedented two-series whitewash at home, poor tactics, poor body language, and poor body language. Hope that Test matches nine months away and this negative approach are not the result of this.

It’s disappointing to see what has happened over the past year and a half just to prove this flawed strategy wrong because we all love Indian cricket. truly disappointing that they can’t function on such egos in the interest of Indian cricket.

related subjects

  • Cricket

More on this story.

    • August 16
    BBC Sport microphone and phone

X’s new location disclosure policy: What does it mean for safety?

Elon Musk owned and operated the social media platform X before it added a new “transparency feature” that provides more detail about accounts, including the locations of the users who are located behind them.

X says the move will provide greater transparency and address concerns about “bots” that spread misinformation by enabling users to identify where they are based.

However, users around the world are concerned about privacy and safety.

What is happening here is examined more closely.

What is happening at X?

The new feature, which will be available on the social media platform’s website on November 22, was made public by Nikita Bier, head of product at the social media platform.

“We’ll be rolling out About This Account globally in a couple of hours, allowing you to view the country or region where an account is based. This will be accessible by tapping the signup date on profiles”, Bier wrote.

X account profiles include a clickable “About This Account” page, which is accessible from the user menu. This page has currently only made the account creation date public.

Additionally, it now displays information like the country where the account holder is located, the country where the account was created, the number of times the username has changed, and when, as well as the country of origin at the time of creation. It also indicates whether the app has been installed on an Android device or via the iOS App Store and in which country.

The date the account was verified also appears if the account is verified. For some verified profiles, company affiliation also appears, such as for Marco Rubio’s US Secretary of State or X for Musk.

X said this is necessary to ensure content posted on the platform is “authentic” and transparent.

“This is a crucial first step in protecting the global town square’s integrity. Users can verify the veracity of the content they see on X in many more ways, according to Bier.

Can users opt out of this?

Overall, no. The platform did not appear to offer the option to conceal this information from other users as of Tuesday. For private accounts, which users must request permission from the account holder to follow, the new information is only accessible to users who have been approved to follow them.

We’ve added privacy toggles to only show your region for users who are located in nations with restrictions on free speech, Bier added. He did not specify which nations he was referring to or why users there were receiving this feature.

Could this compromise users ‘ safety?

The new feature, according to Mark Owen Jones, an associate professor of media analytics at Northwestern University in Qatar, could help authorities identify or narrow down a person’s location because of security concerns.

He added that it might also stoke attacks against those who are falsely accused of obtaining their information.

“For example, saying that a journalist has been lying about their location in Poland, could lead to attacks on that person online, maybe in person, accusations of fraud that might have knock-on consequences on their personal and professional life”, Jones said.

In that situation, it runs the risk of causing harm to a person, including their well-being, reputation, and other forms of harassment.

Who might suffer the most from this?

Palestinians in Gaza are one group who could be particularly vulnerable to these sorts of claims, Jones said, because it is very difficult to verify who is telling the truth and who is not.

Some X users have since claimed that accounts purportedly from Palestinians in Gaza are actually based in other nations since the feature was introduced. For instance, according to the About This Account page, an account called @yasminemuhamsd, which was set up last month, appears to be owned by a Palestinian mother in Gaza.

Another verified page, @sam_uel_best appears to be of a woman named Sarah Ali, whose bio reads “a Gazan woman, still resilient”. Links to various fundraisers are reposted on the account for both local causes in the US and for Gaza. These links are primarily inactive. The About This Account page says that this account is based in Nigeria.

In an X-post, the Israeli Foreign Ministry claims that “New X feature ripped mask off numerous fake “Gazan” accounts. One chap is posting from Pakistan, the other is in London. Another manipulative abuser somewhere else. All of whom claim to be suffering in Gaza while residing in a far-off coffee shop.

However, many people use VPN [virtual private network] services to conceal their locations while browsing the internet and conceal their IP addresses. This can also spoof the location online and show it to be different from the actual location of the user.

Because it only provides location information without verifying its accuracy, Jones claimed the feature is only of limited value.

“Of course, we are aware of scammers and phony Palestinians trying to get money,” Jones said. However, he said, the creation of these sorts of accounts is just as likely to be a ploy to discredit genuine X users in Gaza.

What if you set up a number of fake accounts that are obviously swindlers and then use those accounts to claim that Palestinians are being defrauded? There are some people doing that, and you could easily engineer that scenario. If your job is to basically make Palestinians look bad and you don’t have any scruples, that’s exactly what you’d do”.

According to Jones, pro-Israeli accounts have long used conspiracy theories to undermine Palestinian content on social media, including one about what they call “Paliwood.”

Pro-Israeli users claim that videos of atrocities in Gaza were staged and fake by using terms like “Paliwood” and “Gazawood.”

Jones said that if pro-Israeli accounts can claim that Palestinian influencers and journalists are also lying about their location, “it’s another piece of ‘ evidence ‘ saying that they are just misleading the public”.

“These reputational attacks on Palestinians, which will serve as a fuel for further bolstering the Israeli occupation and genocide,” says one critic.

Will this feature actually aid in the detection of real “bots”?

It’s debatable.

According to their About This Account pages, several Donald Trump supporters’ accounts, including those called @MAGANationX and @MAGAStormX, have been shown to be based in Eastern Europe since the feature was released on November 22.

Similar pages appear to have pages in Thailand and Bangladesh, which raises user concerns about the alleged high number of “bots” operating in foreign nations who are disseminating political and electoral misinformation on the platform.

However, because of the widespread use of VPNs, which mask users ‘ true locations, people cannot confirm the information they see, Jones said. In consequence, users are effectively tasked with identifying fraud, spam bots, or state-backed information operations.

It only provides location information without actually enabling users to determine whether the location data is accurate. What’s the point of rolling out a feature when you also roll out a qualifier saying, well, the accuracy of this information cannot be trusted?

Instead of crowdsourcing account policing, the companies should be able to stop users from using the platform and having accounts. Again, it’s just businesses being lazy, not doing their due diligence, and then passing responsibility on the customer.

Can ‘ About this Account ‘ pages be doctored?

Can you provide screenshots and images of them.

Some X users have already started sharing fake photos and videos that purport to show other users’ “About This Account” pages. One post on X, for example, accused the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) account of being based in Israel.

Bier responded to Bier’s contention, saying that since account creation, DHS has only shown IPs from Americans.

The department’s account location displayed the US when Al Jazeera checked on Tuesday.

On November 23, the department posted on its X account:” I can’t believe we have to say this, but this account has only ever been run and operated from the United States. Videos and screenshots are both simple to edit and forge. I appreciate you paying attention to this issue.

Could the “About This Account” page contain incorrect information?

The feature is very new on X and Bier acknowledged that his team is ironing out a few” rough edges “which would be resolved by Tuesday this week.

‘They told me to choose between my hijab and boxing’

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Zeina Nassar sat down with her parents in their Berlin living room, arranging her notes in a pile, and prepared to explain why they should allow her box.

The 13-year-old immediately felt a connection to the sport after watching YouTube training videos of female fighters. The punches’ pounding, the rhythm of each movement, and the power of each movement.

Nassar, 27, tells BBC Sport, “I watched it again and again.” I was aware that this is what I want to do.

So Nassar argued for her future while acting as a young attorney.

She recalls telling them that boxing was about respect and discipline and that it would help my focus at school.

    • 11 December 2024
    • 25 July 2024

As a Muslim teenager who proudly wore a hijab, Nassar, who was born in Germany and of Lebanese descent, would soon discover that her greatest challenge lay beyond her immediate family.

Although hijabs were prohibited from competing at the time, she joined her neighborhood boxing gym. She would have to defend her competitive rights.

She says, “People told me I had to pick my hijab over my sport.” Why should I make a decision, I thought? Nobody is being hurt by me. Just to box, I say.

Her career would eventually depend on that desire to challenge injustice.

When she makes her professional Pakistan debut on Wednesday, Nassar will wear her full body covering and hijab. Living legend Roy Jones Jr., who will act as a trainer and mentor, will be in her corner.

There are no known high-profile instances of a professional woman boxing in a hijab, which adds to Nassar’s debut even more significant.

How Nassar, a wearer of the hijab, revised the regulations

Getty Images

In order to compete in long-sleeved combat, Nassar helped to change German amateur boxing rules at the age of 14.

But she could feel her eyes racing as she entered her first amateur competition.

She claims, “I noticed that there were so many people looking.” Some even threatened to strike me, and I responded, “Please, we just changed the rules.”

It should be about my performance and how good I feel in the ring, I just didn’t understand. There were so many people who opposed it.

Nassar dominated the ring and changed her mind, winning both times and holding the title of true to her beliefs.

She hit a wall when the International Boxing Association (IBA) made an invitation to the European Championships. Worldwide, the hijab was still prohibited.

So she began organizing campaigns at age 19 to change the law.

She claims that “Germany wasn’t supporting me.” But I had a lot of ambition. I aspired to fairness like everyone else who competes.

The hijabi ban was lifted by the IBA in 2019. World Boxing, which also permits hijabs and full-body coverings, is now the official bodyguard for Olympic boxing.

The rules of professional boxing for Hijabs

In 2017, she attracted Nike’s attention as a face of the brand’s new hijab for athletes thanks to Nassar’s campaign, which changed the amateur world.

What about the ranks of professionals, though? What regulations apply? A hijab might be dangerous. Would it be advantageous in any way?

Several governing and sanctioning bodies contacted BBC Sport. Local commissions are responsible for making attire decisions under the WBO (World Boxing Organization). There are no specific regulations for religious headgear at the IBF (International Boxing Federation).

The British Boxing Board of Control, which regulates professional boxing in the UK, permits hijabs made of sports design.

Oliver Wittmann, president of the German Boxing Federation, acknowledges that there is little precedent, but he worries about the threat of a hijab falling off during a fight.

Nassar uses her own experience to refute Wittman’s assertions. It has never caused a problem in “about 100 amateur fights,” she claims.

The medical experts concur. According to Professor Mike Loosemore, who has served as Team GB’s medical officer, “it’s not an issue.”

He said, “Hijabs are made of light, breathable fabric.” I don’t mind people boxing while wearing hijabs.

Pakistan: a far-fetched location for a four-day boxing competition

Zeina Nassar raises her right hand and looks at the camera during trainingAlex Huber

More than 20 000 fans are expected in Lahore over the course of four days of professional fights, compared to Pakistan, which is not often associated with a global boxing championship.

A number of local and international fighters will appear on the show, including James Metcalf, Jimmy Kelly, and Alex Dilmaghani, who are supported by the Punjab government.

It is an “honour” to fight in a nation where there are Muslims, according to Nassar.

The Liverpudlian organizer of the event, Chris Glover, states that “boxing is for everyone.” For all I care, Zeina could wear a cowboy hat if she wanted to wear a hijab. She is an innovator.

Jones Jr., the four-weight champion turned coach, will be in her corner. Years ago, Nassar first met him at an IBA event.

She laughs, “I couldn’t believe I was seated next to him.”

He then began demonstrating moves to me, offering me advice, and keeping in touch. He has taught me a lot about footwork, power, and belief.

In six or seven fights, Nassar has a bold goal of becoming a world champion.

related subjects

  • Boxing
    • Earlier, 4 days ago
    Frazer Clarke faces off with Jeamie TKV
    • 28 April 2024
    Split image of Claressa Shields, Paddy Pimblett and Chris Eubank Jr

BBC boxing is back in action.

    • August 16
    BBC Sport microphone and phone