Rescuers in Indonesia have been searching for survivors of a landslide that inundated three villages in Java, after days of heavy rainfall. Several people have been reported killed.
Rescue teams search at scene of Indonesia landslide


Rescuers in Indonesia have been searching for survivors of a landslide that inundated three villages in Java, after days of heavy rainfall. Several people have been reported killed.

Venezuela on Tuesday announced what it called a major nationwide military deployment in response to the presence of growing United States naval forces off its coast.
On Thursday, the US also unveiled an operation, called Southern Spear, which it said was intended to target “narco-terrorists” in the Western Hemisphere.
The escalation has raised alarm in Caracas, where officials worry the US may be using these operations as a pretext to force President Nicolas Maduro out of power.
“We tell the American empire not to dare: We are prepared,” Foreign Minister Yvan Gil said on Thursday at an event in Caracas.
But is Venezuela really prepared for a US attack or invasion? What are its military capabilities? And what might be the calculus driving the decisions of US President Donald Trump and Maduro, respectively?
Tensions between Washington and Caracas have been spiralling for weeks, as the Trump administration has hit a series of boats in the Caribbean Sea and, more recently, the Pacific Ocean, claiming they were carrying individuals smuggling narcotics into the US.
The 20th strike took place this week, US officials have said. In all, about 80 people have been killed. The Trump administration has not presented any evidence to back its assertion that the bombed boats had narcotics or drug smugglers on them, or that the vessels were even headed to the US. It has also not offered any legal justification for its actions, which many experts believe violate international law.
At the centre of Washington’s allegations is an unsubstantiated claim that Venezuela’s Maduro is driving the narcotics smuggling to the US in cahoots with cartels.
Meanwhile, the US has dispatched the USS Gerald R Ford carrier strike group into Caribbean and Latin American waters, a powerful naval formation built around the world’s most advanced and largest aircraft carrier.
An aircraft carrier is a floating airbase – a warship that can launch, land, refuel, and arm military aircraft at sea.
The Ford is a nuclear-powered supercarrier equipped with advanced technology, sailing alongside guided-missile destroyers and support ships, with more than 4,000 personnel and dozens of tactical aircraft ready for rapid deployment.
#Venezuela: I’ve often described the USS Gerald R. Ford in the media as a “floating fortress of American power.” Some facts and figures showing why: pic.twitter.com/f53PeACIOB
As Washington expands its military presence in the region, analysts say the stated goals of the mission have broadened and may not fully align with the capabilities of the forces being deployed.
“The administration has said that the deployment is to stop the flow of illegal drugs to the US, and also to degrade the cartels, but over time the US goal has expanded to include anti-Maduro regime activities,” said Mark Cancian, senior adviser in the defence and security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), in an analysis posted on X early on Friday.
Cancian noted that the carrier may not be fully optimised for the mission as described. “The Ford is not well suited for counter-drug operations… It’s well suited to attack adversaries either at sea or on land.”
He also pointed out that the deployment of the Ford cannot be indefinite.
“There are demands around the world for its presence because it’s such a powerful military asset, and eventually it’ll have to go home – so Southern Command will need to either use it or stand down,” he said, referring to the US military command under which the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean fall.

On Tuesday, Venezuela’s government announced a “massive” mobilisation of troops and civilians to prepare for any potential US action.
Venezuelan Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez announced a “higher phase” of the Independence Plan 200, a military response mechanism ordered in September to strengthen defence measures against the US presence in the Caribbean.
“Nearly 200,000 troops have been deployed throughout the national territory for this exercise,” Padrino Lopez added.
The exercise was scheduled to start Tuesday and end on Wednesday.
Padrino Lopez also stressed that the country’s military forces were united. He said “more than 90 percent of the people reject any aggression against Venezuela,” dismissing opposition groups he described as “minority, subversive, [and] fascist”, and claiming they “no longer exist” in the national political landscape.
He framed the mobilisation as part of a broader stand against “imperialist aggression” and Washington’s attempts to act as “the world’s hegemon” and “the world’s police”, insisting that Venezuela remains committed to its independence, liberty and sovereignty.

According to analysts, Venezuela’s armed forces indeed are – for the most part – closely tied, politically, economically, and institutionally to the movement known as Chavismo that has shaped the Venezuelan state for more than 20 years.
The military doctrine is based on policies laid out by the late Hugo Chavez, and it is based on members being “patriotic, popular and anti-imperialist”. Maduro took over as president after Chavez died in 2013.
“I don’t think that the Venezuelan government and the military are going to fracture only because of threats,” Elias Ferrer, founder of Orinoco Research and the lead editor of Venezuelan media organisation Guacamaya, told Al Jazeera.
“Because of the way they think in front of threats, they’ve always stuck together and strengthened their position,” he added.

According to Global Firepower’s 2025 Military Strength Ranking, Venezuela places 50th worldwide out of 160 countries assessed in terms of military capabilities.
Within Latin America, it ranks seventh.
It falls behind regional militaries such as those of Brazil, Mexico and Argentina, and sits in a similar range to Colombia, Chile, and Peru.
According to a report released by CSIS this week, Venezuela’s air force is small and only partially functional.
Roughly 30 of its 49 aircraft are believed to be operational, and only three F-16s can still fly, due to a lack of spare parts caused by US sanctions.
According to Military.com, a platform focused on the US military and veteran community, Venezuela has invested billions in Russian-made weapons systems, including missiles and fighter jets, intended to deter or challenge US ships and aircraft.
Venezuela has at least 21 operational Su-30s, a Russian fighter aircraft developed in the 1980s.
The Su-30s can be armed with supersonic antiship missiles, such as the Kh-31A, which are a significant threat to naval warships operating near Venezuela.

The CSIS report notes that in the event of a conflict, Venezuelan airfields and aircraft would likely be among the first US targets. The US has deployed F-35 stealth fighters to the region, and they are likely intended to counter both Venezuelan fighter-jet manoeuvres and the country’s air-defence systems.
On the ground, however, the analysis suggests that Venezuela maintains a significantly larger troop presence and greater firepower than the limited US forces currently positioned offshore.
According to Global Firepower, from a total population of 31 million, the Venezuelan military has an active military personnel of 337,000. Of them, 109,000 are active members, 220,000 belong to paramilitary forces, and the remaining 8,000 are reserve personnel.
But experts say these numbers mask a more troublesome reality for Venezuela: Its military forces have been hampered by years of limited warfighting training and a focus on internal security.
Its navy, meanwhile, is no match for the US and its uncontested control at sea.
Ultimately, analysts agree that the US is militarily far superior to Venezuela.
“No one can match the power of the United States military in conventional warfare,” Ferrer, the Orinoco Research founder, told Al Jazeera.
“What we need to think about in Venezuela is the capacity of the local armed forces to resist or to make the country ungovernable.
“They can make it so costly that it’s not worth it; that’s how you win in asymmetric warfare,” Ferrer added.

Trump has justified the recent military buildup by arguing it is necessary to curb the flow of drugs into the US. But many analysts believe this is an effort to increase pressure on Nicolas Maduro.
The US president has said he does not plan to invade Venezuela, and Carlos Pina, a Venezuelan political scientist, believes Washington’s preferred strategy is indeed still political rather than military.
“I still believe that the main option for the US is not to carry out any armed attack, but to apply enough pressure for Nicolas Maduro to resign and hand over power peacefully,” he said. “In my opinion, that remains the most desirable option for the US.”
Pina argued that Maduro is fully aware of this strategy and is responding accordingly. “Maduro knows this, and because he knows it, he tries to raise the cost of any potential intervention,” Pina said. “He also counts on the fact that, both in the region and even within the country, a military invasion would likely not be well regarded or well received.”
However, Pina warned that the scale of the US deployment creates political pressure of its own in Washington.
“After sending so much military equipment to the Caribbean, it would be a political and diplomatic defeat for Trump to do nothing, to pull back and leave things as they were before the mobilisation,” he said.
Because of this, Pina said he expects the US to continue escalating rather than retreating. “Trump will probably do something to avoid that defeat,” he said. “He will likely keep increasing military pressure to force a political change, to initiate a transition. And as the days go by, he will continue building up more force-equipment, ships, planes, even troops in the Caribbean.”

Sara Cox has reflected on the cruel bullying she endured as a child, and revealed how she finally got her own back years later, as she tackles one of her toughest challenges yet for Children in Need.
Sara is currently in the middle of her enormous 135-mile Great Northern Marathon for Children in Need, which involves running across Northumberland, Durham, North Yorkshire and West Yorkshire.
She said thinking about “projects that help with kids who might be feeling bullied or anxious” is what motivates her to push through. The Radio 2 presenter previously spoke about her own difficult school years during an appearance on ITV ’s Lorraine in 2019.
In her memoir, Till the Cows Come Home, she recounts joining a new school at age 12 and being targeted almost immediately, which she said went unnoticed at first by the teachers.
“The worst bit was they held my hands behind my back and shoved an ice cream in my face in the playground,” she told Lorraine Kelly. She added that when she initially reported what was happening, staff “didn’t really believe me because I was the new girl”, but a teacher eventually witnessed the ice cream incident and understood how bad the situation was.
She explained that the intimidation she faced was constant and often subtle. “It was that mild intimidation, being a bit worried about walking along the corridor in case you get tripped up, the whispering in class. It is horrible,” she said.
While speaking to Jeremy Vine on Radio 2 last week, she described how two girls “just made my life hell”, with “accidentally on purpose nudging you as they walk past you in the corridor, or a little foot sticking out to trip you up.”
Despite the misery she experienced, Sara revealed she unexpectedly got the last word years later. Once she was a hugely successful Radio 1 presenter, she was contacted by one of the girls who had bullied her, asking for an on-air shoutout.
“That says to me that she didn’t really realise the effect that she was having,” she said. Sara admitted that while on air, she dedicated an entire segment to how awful that period of her life had been.
She laughed: “I wouldn’t do that now. It kind of felt good at the time. It was perhaps a nice closure on it all.” Jeremy Vine asked whether those experiences gave her inner strength, and Sara shared that it has inspired her to take on a monumental fundraising mission for Children in Need to support other children who are going through what she went through.
The challenge has taken a huge physical toll on her, and Sara has admitted: “There’s an adjective short of ‘hell’… I’m so puffy, I’ve never seen my ankles look like this.” She added: “I just look like I’ve been in the wars. We’ve just got to push. Push, push, push.”
Despite the pain, she has now raised over £5 million, which Scott Mills revealed live on air. But behind the scenes, her exhaustion is clear. Speaking on Radio 2, Scott said: “Sara is really struggling…she’s worried about [finishing] and panicking that she can’t. Anxiety is high again.”

TV star Jack Osbourne’s stint on I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here! could serve as ‘therapy’ for him, according to singer Peter Andre. Andre, who took part in the third series back in 2004, explained that contestants experience significant ‘downtime’ between filming sessions, providing ample opportunity for self-reflection.
Speaking to ITV’s Good Morning Britain (GMB) on Friday, Andre said: “I probably think that’s why someone like Jack Osbourne doing it is a good thing for him. I mean, I don’t know his reasons for doing it, but it probably could be a bit of therapy for him.
“Because it is just you, you’re in the wilderness. Yes, you’re surrounded by people, but there’s a lot of downtime, a lot of time that you’re on your own. And even though there are cameras everywhere, you can’t see them. They’re hidden, they’re camouflaged.”
He then added: “The cameramen – you can’t talk to them, they won’t answer you[…] It brings a lot out of you. You’re just you, and there are no phones.”
Osbourne, whose dad, Black Sabbath legend Ozzy Osbourne, passed away earlier this year, revealed he was heading into the jungle to distract himself from recent events. He mentioned that his mum, Sharon, and sister, Kelly, would be ‘supportive’ of his participation.
Andre, who famously met his former wife Katie Price on the ITV programme, also confirmed the hunger experienced by contestants was the ‘real deal’. He continued: “Well, there’s only probably about three – maybe 400 people in the world that have experienced this. It’s an incredible experience.
“There are certain smells and sounds that you only know if you’ve experienced it. Hunger is one of those things that I had never experienced before, and for anyone that hasn’t experienced it, you genuinely get it there. It’s the real deal.”
In light of this, Andre said he would advise new contestants against eating lots of food before entering the jungle. He went on: “The dreaded thing which I always tell them never to do, is to keep eating so much before you go in.
“Because you think well, ‘I’m not going to eat, so I may as well stock up’. But the problem is then your body goes into shock. So it’s actually better to get your body used to it.”
Osbourne will be joined in the Australian jungle by Spandau Ballet star Martin Kemp, model Kelly Brook, former England Lionesses footballer Alex Scott and comedian Ruby Wax.
The line-up is completed by rapper Aitch, real name Harrison Armstrong, social media star Morgan Burtwistle, who is known as Angryginge, EastEnders’ Shona McCarty, comedian Eddie Kadi, and Emmerdale’s Lisa Riley.
Regular presenters Ant McPartlin and Declan Donnelly will return to host the show in its 25th anniversary year. Last year’s series was won by McFly singer Danny Jones.

A judge in the United Kingdom has ruled that global mining giant BHP Group is liable in Brazil’s worst environmental disaster, in a lawsuit the claimants’ lawyers previously valued at up to 36 billion pounds ($48bn).
High Court Justice Finola O’Farrell said on Friday that Australia-based BHP was responsible despite not owning the dam at the time.
list of 3 itemsend of list
A dam collapse 10 years ago unleashed tonnes of toxic waste into a major river, killing 19 people and devastating villages downstream.
Anglo-Australian BHP owns 50% of Samarco, the Brazilian company that operates the iron ore mine where the tailings dam ruptured on November 5, 2015. Enough mine waste to fill 13,000 Olympic-size swimming pools poured into the Doce River in southeastern Brazil.
Sludge from the burst dam destroyed the once-bustling village of Bento Rodrigues in Minas Gerais state, badly damaged other towns, left thousands homeless and flooded forests.
The disaster also killed 14 tonnes of freshwater fish and polluted 600km (370 miles) of the Doce River, according to a study by the University of Ulster in the UK. The river, which the Krenak Indigenous people revere as a deity, has yet to recover.
O’Farrell said in her ruling that continuing to raise the height of the dam when it was not safe to do so was the “direct and immediate cause” of the dam’s collapse, meaning BHP was liable under Brazilian law.
BHP said it would appeal against the ruling and continue to fight the lawsuit. BHP’s President Minerals Americas Brandon Craig said in a statement that 240,000 claimants in the London lawsuit “have already been paid compensation in Brazil”.
The case was filed in the UK because one of BHP’s two main legal entities was based in London at the time.
The trial began in October 2024, just days before Brazil’s federal government reached a multibillion-dollar settlement with the mining companies.
Under the agreement, Samarco – which is also half-owned by Brazilian mining giant Vale – agreed to pay 132 billion reais ($23bn) over 20 years. The payments were meant to compensate for human, environmental and infrastructure damage.

Former world heavyweight champion Joseph Parker is facing a possible ban from boxing after testing positive for cocaine.
The 33-year-old New Zealander failed a drugs test on the day of his fight with Fabio Wardley on 26 October, according to the Sun.
He was tested by the Voluntary Anti Doping Agency (Vada) on 25 October.
Sources have confirmed to BBC Sport Parker tested positive for the recreational drug and not performance enhancing drugs.
Parker could receive a two-year ban but could also be suspended for as little as three months depending on circumstances.
Any ban would be handed down by UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) and the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBC).
Ukad, however, did not administer this test and will need to conduct their own investigation.
Queensberry have been informed by Vada about the failed test.
The BBC has contacted Vada, Parker’s promoters Queensberry and the BBBC for comment.
Boxer Liam Cameron was given a four-year ban in 2019 for testing positive for benzoylecgonine, a metabolic acid of cocaine, but rules have changed since then with Rugby League player Adam Rusling getting a three-month ban in 2024 for testing positive for cocaine and MDMA.
Parker was hoping to put himself in position for a shot at undisputed champion Oleksandr Usyk but was upset by British fighter Wardley at the O2 Arena.


