Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are “vulnerable” to losing their royal titles, according to royal biographer Tom Bower when Prince William assumes power.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are on borrowed time with their royal titles amid what a royal expert describes as their ongoing betrayals and growing threat to the royal family. Biographer Tom Bower says the “ruthless” and unprecedented act of stripping Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of his Duke and Prince titles should serve as a serious warning to the couple about what their future could hold once Prince William becomes monarch.
King Charles ’s younger brother lost his titles and his Royal Lodge home of 20 years following more revelations about his decades-long friendship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “For Harry, it was an unbelievable shock that the King could strip Andrew of his titles, including Prince, and it changes everything,” he tells the Mirror. “He must really fear that William will strip him, Meghan and the children of their titles when he succeeds to the throne.
READ MORE: Smyths Toys issues alert to anyone shopping online this Christmas
They are currently vulnerable and on borrowed time because William is still furious and Kate and William are unsure of what can be done to stop the harm they have caused them.
In Harry’s memoir Spare, Tom claims that many of their repeated betrayals of the royal family are simply too catastrophic to overlook. They go beyond revealing intimate details of Prince William and Kate’s interactions with them.
The pair’s jaw-dropping interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, the year they resigned as working royals, was their biggest success, Tom says, and William is already at risk from the threat of them hurling similar grenades at him in the future.
Meghan and Harry are both making a lot of money, so the threat is that they will act foolishly and harm the royal family.
“They are uncontrolled, so Meghan’s risk is one of writing a memoir or hosting an interview like Oprah Winfrey.” Meghan’s accusations that the royal family is racist continue to permeate the interview’s legacy. Who has any idea what she might say next?”
Meghan’s use of her own royal titles has been a major sticking point since the couple moved to Montecito, California, and started a new life there.
The Palace and the pair agreed that they would stop using their His/Her Royal Highness titles but could still keep them when they left as working royals. It was compared to the time when Andrew, the then-Duke of York, made the deal.
However, it became questionable if Meghan was breaking their agreement when she gave a card with the words “With the Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex” as a gift to IT Cosmetics founder Jamie Kern Lima in April of this year.
The couple’s defense of the monogrammed card, which was defended by “sources close to the couple,” was mentioned in a number of places, claiming that it was a personal gift and not connected to her As Ever lifestyle or any other commercial transactions.
Meghan’s interview with Harper’s Bazaar earlier this month reignited the discussion because the journalist had a strange-sounding encounter in his interview. When the house manager announces “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex,” even though we appear to be the only other two people present, wrote Kaitlyn Greenidge about our meeting with Meghan.
The title has a lot of power over Meghan, according to Tom, whose second tell-all book on the Sussexes will be released next year. He claims that “she uses it ruthlessly and with impunity” and that it is a great trading asset. She simply uses it to give herself the status she craves, not because she cared about the royal family.
Meghan didn’t realize that his uncle had lost his title until Harry explained that, he said, “and that is a reality.” I don’t believe she or any of us even realized how brutally ruthless they were. I can only imagine her contemplating, “What are we going to do? ” Who is she because she doesn’t have any titles? However, whenever she uses the title, she betrays the royal family.
The bombshell statement from Buckingham Palace about King Charles, 77, formally stripping his brother of his “style, titles and honours” came a few weeks after Andrew, 65, relinquished his Duke of York title.
Epstein was found dead in his federal prison cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial, but the statement read, “These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.”
However, Tom says it won’t be easy to remove Meghan and Harry’s titles and that King Charles won’t be putting their names on the papers. The royal family finds it hard and rocked by the Sussexes’ titles. Even if it would appear like sour grapes, Meghan’s status can only be undermined by her removal of her title.
“And it won’t take place in Charles’s lifetime.” There is no justification for him to take advantage of William’s pressure, and they haven’t done anything embarrassing with it other than using it to trade on. They are only currently under no obligation to remove their titles. I believe it will be inevitable, but they would have to be very cautious with how they do it.





