After the Beatles split in 1970, Sir Paul McCartney admitted he didn’t know what to do with himself.
The legendary Beatles quartet, which included Sir Paul McCartney, formed a quarter of the group in the 1960s that was a global success. Each member was forced to chart their own course as The Beatles publicly disbanded in April 1970.
Sir Paul retreated to Scotland before launching Wings a year later – a group that would go on to shift 22 million albums in its own right.
Wings: the Story of a Band on the Run, a new book, provides a close examination of Paul’s experiences right after The Beatles’ demise.
The 83-year-old revealed that the band’s initial years proved challenging because they had ruled his life for such a long time and left him unsure of what would come next.
It was very difficult for me to leave the Beatles, or to have them leave me, Paul said. It was my life’s job. Soo, when it came to a stop, it said, “What do we do now?”
I actually had no idea. Either don’t play music and think about other things, or play music and figure out how to do that.
Paul had reached extraordinary heights with the Beatles, but with Wings, he was able to maintain that acclaim.
Additionally, Paul’s appeal lasted well into the 2000s and continues to do so through the 2020s, with his Grammy-winning Record of the Year performance. Paul McCartney’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) to isolate John Lennon’s voice from a 1978 home demo for the 2023 single “Now and Then” has added another accolade to The Beatles’ long list.
Despite the song becoming the first AI-assisted track to win a Grammy, Paul has voiced his concerns about the technology, urging people not to let it exploit artists.
Paul reacted to AI creating a “Wild West” that did not adequately protect artists in a conversation with BBC’s Laura Kuensberg.
He said, “You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song without owning it. They are not involved in it at all. And anyone who wants can just steal it.
The money is actually traveling somewhere, according to the statement. Why shouldn’t the person who sat down and wrote “Origin” be paid?
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply