UN inquiry accuses Israel of crime of ‘extermination’ in Gaza

During its occupation of Gaza, Israel has been accused by UN investigators of intentionally attacking and killing medical personnel.

In its assault on Gaza, which it launched after Hamas, the Palestinian armed group, led a deadly cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel was accused of “commiting war crimes and the crime against humanity of extermination with relentless and deliberate attacks on medical personnel and facilities,” according to a statement from ex-UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, which was made public on Thursday ahead of a full report.

According to Pillay, whose report will be presented to the UN General Assembly on October 30th, “children in particular have suffered the brunt of these attacks, suffering both directly and indirectly as a result of the collapse of the health system.”

Israeli authorities have consistently claimed that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups are the targets of Israeli attacks on hospitals and schools in Gaza. Hassan denied that Hamas operates from command centers.

Additionally, the UN inquiry claimed that Israeli forces had systematically targeted and tortured medical personnel, targeted and prevented patients from leaving Gaza.

The purpose of the Commission of Inquiry is to gather information and identify those suspected of crimes against humanity in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories. It relies on a variety of sources, including testimony from victims and witnesses, submissions, and satellite imagery.

In response to the COI’s earlier assertions, both Israel and Hamas committed war crimes in the first few months of the Gaza war, and that Israel’s actions also constituted crimes against humanity due to the devastating casualties suffered by the country’s citizens. The term is reserved for the most serious crimes committed without knowing it as part of a coordinated or widespread attack on civilians.

Children deal with ‘ brunt ‘ of attacks

Pillay urged Israel to “immediately stop” its “wanton destruction of healthcare facilities in Gaza.”

Pillay continued, “Children in particular have suffered the brunt of these attacks, suffering both directly and indirectly as a result of the health system’s collapse.”

The report cited the death of a six-year-old Palestinian girl, Hind Rajab, who died, along with her cousins, aunt and uncle, after pleading for help for hours.

Rajab’s passing was described as one of “the most egregious cases” of Israeli attack on the healthcare system, according to the COI.

‘ Systemic abuse ‘ of detainees

The report found that thousands of Palestinians were subject to “widespread and systemic abuse, physical and psychological violence, and sexual and gender-based violence” within Israeli military camps and detention centers.

Additionally, it stated that male prisoners were raped and sexually assaulted.

The COI said the “institutional mistreatment” of Palestinians was under direct order from far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

The statement also demanded the release of all Israeli prisoners in the enclave because many of them were “physically affected and suffering severely mentally” and that many were being held in Gaza.

Inside the last functioning hospital in Sudan’s Khartoum North

Alsuna Issa, the only remaining hospital in Khartoum North, sits perched on the edge of a small cot next to her young son in a patient room, far from Bahri Hospital’s bustling corridors, which is the only remaining functioning hospital in Sudan.

The young boy, Jaber, dressed in distressed jeans and a Spiderman t-shirt that grazes his enlarged belly, is malnourished.

Patients in similar circumstances wait their turn, hoping to be treated in a nation that has been suffering from more than 18 months of fighting between the army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

After having son Jaber for days with fever and diarrhoea, Alsuna Issa found no hospitals that were open to her home [Screengrab/Al Jazeera] and brought him to the hospital.

Khartoum North’s only hospital is still operational.

In one of the three cities that make up Khartoum, Sudan’s national capital region, is located in the northern part of the city, where the Sudanese army recently seized it from RSF control in late September.

It is the only hospital left in the city, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), after more than 100 health facility attacks since April last year due to repeated targeting of healthcare facilities throughout Sudan’s conflict.

After having him for days with fever and diarrhea, issa was unable to locate a hospital that was open to the public near her home.

“He has been vomiting and his stomach is distended. There are no hospitals close to where he is undergoing treatment for malaria and a stomach infection, despite the fact that they tested him. So I brought him here and he was admitted,” the distraught young mother told Al Jazeera.

According to doctors, hundreds of patients visit the city every day, including those who reside in RSF-held neighborhoods, for needs ranging from child nutrition to surgeries.

However, it’s difficult to get to this hospital.

“We live far away, getting back home is difficult. Sometimes there is artillery shelling or fighting, so we have to hide out in the house closest to us.

“Sometimes the hospital is too crowded so we have to come back the next day,” one patient, Iqbal Ali, told Al Jazeera.

Another patient, Karima Ikram Ahmed Adam, said, “When someone falls sick … they come carrying them in a wheelbarrow or on a donkey if possible. ”

The deteriorating security situation has forced more than 11 million people from their homes, according to Sudan’s government.

Health workers have been impacted by this displacement, leading to a shortage of medical staff and causing hospital closures.

Karima Ikram Ahmed Adam is calling for international aid
Karima Ikram Ahmed Adam is calling for international aid [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]

‘People are just dying and dying’

The availability of medical resources has been severely limited throughout the war, according to Dr. Hadeel Malik, Bahri Hospital’s emergency medical director.

Since the start of the conflict, supply issues have been a problem. In regions that are under the RSF’s control, this is still the case. Sometimes, medical supplies disappear before reaching our hospitals,” Malik told Al Jazeera.

“We fear for the safety of our workers because the RSF has, in the past, detained health workers,” she added.

The situation is much better now, even if it is still critical, despite the fact that the RSF has controlled the situation there for the past year and a half.

“What we encountered was a lot of devastation, severe destruction and major theft from all the health centres and facilities,” said Malik.

Dr Hadeel Malik, Bahri Hospital‘s emergency health director
Dr Hadeel Malik, Bahri Hospital‘s emergency health director [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]

Over the past year, Malik has been a member of the coalition that established more than 23 health facilities in Khartoum North as a response.

For Adam, the patient at the hospital, having community support has been essential to compensate for inadequate healthcare.

“By God, if there is someone in our neighbourhood who is sick, everyone, the people, and the neighbours, come together and support each other,” she said.

Because the situation is crucial, you can’t manage without the entire neighborhood collaborating. ”

Bahri Hospital [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]
Bahri Hospital [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]

Adam urged the international community to send aid amid the country’s dire situation.

“People are just dying and dying, and there has been no aid reaching us until now,” she said.

“So, I’m pleading for aid to reach us, for medicines to reach us, because the number of sick children is overwhelming. ”

Bahri Hospital [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]
Bahri Hospital [Screengrab/Al Jazeera]

Why is pro-China Maldives leader Muizzu seeking to mend India ties?

In an effort to repair ties that had been strained by Muizzu’s anti-India rhetoric during his election campaign, Maldives President Mohamed Muizzu called India a “valued partner” on his first state visit to New Delhi.

Traditional strong ties between the two Indian Ocean countries were threatened by Muizzu’s pro-China position and campaign to force Indian troops out of the archipelago. &nbsp,

The Maldivian leader, however, showed a willingness to engage with India after winning the election in late 2023, and he appears to have found a willing partner in New Delhi. “Maldives is India’s key maritime neighbour in the Indian Ocean Region”, India’s Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement announcing Muizzu’s five-day visit, which began on Sunday.

So why has Muizzu visited India, and what does it mean for India-Maldives ties?

What was on the agenda for Muizzu’s visit?

Muizzu received a warm welcome on the red carpet, and he met with senior Indian officials and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

According to India’s foreign office, Muizzu and Modi discussed “energy, trade, financial linkages and defence cooperation”. Specifically, they talked about a free trade agreement.

After the meeting, Modi said India would help the Maldives develop infrastructure projects. To help the cash-strapped Maldivian economy, India approved a $400 million currency swap agreement.

This agreement, according to Muizzu, “will be very helpful in addressing the foreign exchange problems we are currently facing.”

The two leaders also reportedly set up a runway at the Maldives’ Hanimaadhoo International Airport.

The Maldives president is visiting India, but why?

The Maldives’ budget deficit and debt burden are present. With its foreign reserves declining by $440 million, it has the potential to default on debt repayments.

The Maldives, which heavily borrowed from China during former President Abdulla Yameen’s term, owes Beijing $1.37bn, according to World Bank data. Male’s major source of credit is also New Delhi.

Muizzu and China signed agreements on infrastructure and climate in Beijing in January, but he did not cross the bridges with New Delhi. Historically, Male has cultivated friendly ties with New Delhi. Yameen, a former ally of Muizzu, forged closer China ties and signed big infrastructure projects.

“Muizzu has been trying to better balance the relations between the Maldives and China and the Maldives and India”, Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Washington-based Wilson Center, told Al Jazeera.

Kugelman noted that Muizzu has continued to work closely with India in other areas, “especially when it comes to commercial and economic ties,” despite showing a desire to “increase ties with China, particularly on the defense side.”

The island nation’s tourism sector, which accounts for nearly a third of GDP, accounts for the island nation’s economy in large part. An abundance of luxurious resorts can be found on the 1, 192 islands in the archipel.

However, the economy was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent strains with India. More than 200, 000 Indians visited the Maldives in 2023 – the highest from any country. But the numbers dipped by 42 percent this year, amid tensions following Muizzu’s election. India is also one of the Maldives’ main trading partners.

Kugelman said, “I think Muizzu recognizes that there can’t be any impression that he wants to withdraw from India and all of the crucial economic and development support that comes with it.”

What was the opposition’s ‘ India Out ‘ campaign?

The parties’ leaders, including Yameen, led by Muizzu’s People’s National Congress (PNC) and its ally Progressive Party of the Maldives (PPM), campaigned for the removal of a small contingent of Indian troops from the Maldives due to opposition concerns about the country’s sovereignty.

Mohamed Saeed, a senior leader from Muizzu’s PNC, said, “We are not against the people of India”.

The Indian military must leave, according to the people of our country. We are a very fragile country. When the “India Out” campaign was launched in 2020 under the leadership of pro-India Ibrahim Solih, he said, “We cannot afford to have any military presence of another country here.”

The two helicopters and one of the aircraft India had donated to the Maldives were being operated by Indian forces, according to New Delhi.

However, opposition parties claimed that the island nation’s government planned to build a permanent Indian military base. According to a leaked document that was made available to local media, Indian navy ships would use a dockyard run by India for the Maldivian coastguard for years.

The opposition questioned why parliament wasn’t hearing about such a significant deal. The government denied the accusation, which included accusing the opposition parties of “spreading lies” when they accused Sloh of signing a secret defense agreement with India. &nbsp,

“India has always been the Maldives ‘ closest ally and trusted neighbour”, a statement by the government said in November.

“Support provided by India, on areas such as search and rescue capabilities, casualty evacuation, coastal surveillance, and maritime reconnaissance, directly benefit the Maldivian people”, it said.

After Muizzu became president, New Delhi withdrew its soldiers and other support staff, but the Maldives and Male came to an agreement to replace them with civilians who will assist in managing the aircraft that India had given them.

What’s the larger geopolitics at play in the Maldives?

Indian forces have long conducted reconnaissance, rescue, and aid operations on Maldivian soil. In 1998, India sent its troops to thwart an opposition coup attempt by Abdul Gayoom, the president at the time.

During Solih’s presidency, India provided financial aid to the Maldives to help fund projects in the education, health and community development sectors, according to a bilateral brief on India’s foreign office website. In 2019, India provided a cash grant of 50 crore Indian rupees ($6m).

The strategically located Maldives, which is situated on one of the world’s busiest maritime routes, is a geopolitical battleground between China and India. China’s expanding military presence in the Maldives and other island countries like Sri Lanka is a concern for New Delhi.

India established a military base on a remote Mauritian island in 2021, according to an Al Jazeera report from the same year. In March, New Delhi constructed a new naval base on its Lakshadweep island, which is located about 130 kilometers (80 miles) north of the Maldives.

Muizzu’s trip is an occasion to reset ties and address New Delhi’s geostrategic concerns.

In a joint statement released on Monday with Muizzu, Modi and Modi stated that “the relationship between India and the Maldives is centuries old.” &nbsp,

Kugelman said India recognises that the Maldives is “a battleground for India-China competition”.

India will continue to have influence over the Maldives as long as its position is viewed as a crucial economic partner, especially when the Maldives are under economic stress, he said.

Will Muizzu’s diplomatic shift affect him back home?

So how will Muizzu’s diplomatic outreach to India be seen in the Maldives, given that he made the “India Out” campaign a major plank of his campaign?

“You have had some notable anti-India sentiment among the public in the Maldives”, Kugelman said. “Undoubtedly, his decision to launch his presidential campaign on a platform to remove the Indian military presence was well-liked and helped him win the presidency,” he said.

Kugelman said that “there are several factors at play that I believe will lessen Muizzu’s political suffering here.”

First, Muizzu upheld his pledge and expelled the Indian military from the Maldives. He also signed some new military agreements that immediately strengthened his defense ties with Beijing. These are things that the Maldivesans who were unhappy about the Indian military presence in the Maldives will have liked.

Muizzu never made a promise to cut back on India’s economic and commercial ties. He never made a promise to avoid speaking out against India. He never promised to essentially cut off that relationship”.

What’s next?

Muizzu’s trip underscores his efforts to repair ties with New Delhi, said analysts. After meeting with Modi, Muizzu said, “India has stood by the Maldives during our times of need and is a key partner in the Maldives’ socioeconomic and infrastructure development.”

In order to decongest the port in Male’s capital, New Delhi also pledged to build a commercial port on the Maldivian island of Thilafushi.

Additionally, Modi said India will offer financial support for the Maldives in the form of a $100m treasury bills rollover.

Modi said India plans to connect the two South Asian nations via the Indian instant payment system Unified Payments Interface after RuPay, an Indian multinational financial services and payment system, was introduced in the Maldives on Monday.

The highlight of Muizzu’s visit, however, was a statement made after his meeting with the Indian PM: “Modi accepted an invitation to a state visit to the Maldives next year.”

Rafael Nadal to retire: What you need to know about the tennis great

Rafael Nadal announced his retirement from tennis following the Davis Cup final this year, ending a distinguished career that included 22 Grand Slam victories, admiration for Roger Federer, and inspiring rivalries with Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer.

“I am retiring from professional tennis. In a video released on social media on Thursday, Nadal stated in a statement on the subject that it has been some difficult years, especially these last two.

“It is obviously a difficult decision, one that has taken me some time to make. However, there is a beginning and an end to everything in this life.

Nadal, 38, is expected to retire as one of tennis’s greatest players ever.

Here’s all to know about the Spanish superstar’s retirement, legacy and what happens next:

Did Nadal’s retirement be forced by his age and injuries?

In many ways, yes. Nadal had previously stated that he anticipated retiring this year due to a hip condition that required surgery and limited his appearance in 2023.

Nadal has had a number of injuries in recent years, including having surgery and having injured himself at the Australian Open in early 2023. Additionally, he has had a number of years of ongoing knee injuries.

He has played only 23 matches in the past two seasons.

How many years did Nadal play professionally?

Twenty-three. In 2001, the boy from Mallorca turned professional. Aged 15, he won his first match at a Challenger tournament in Seville, Spain.

Nadal has won how many tennis titles?

  • Total Grand Slams: 22
  • ATP titles: 92
  • Australian Open: 2 (2009, 2022)
  • French Open: 14 (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022)
  • Wimbledon: 2 (2008, 2010)
  • US Open: 4 (2010, 2013, 2017, 2019)
  • Olympic golds: 1 singles (2008), 1 doubles (2016)
  • Davis Cup: 5 (2004, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2019)

He was the world’s number one for how many weeks?

He was top-ranked for 209 weeks. Nadal was number one in the world at the end of 2008, 2010, 2013, 2017 and 2019.

What is Nadal’s career prize money?

He made a total of $134.9m.

When will Nadal play his last tournament?

Beginning on November 19, Spain will face them in the Davis Cup final.

What is Nadal’s most memorable tennis match?

The Wimbledon 2008 men’s singles final. One of the best matches the men’s sport has ever seen is his victory over grass court expert Federer at the All England Club. Nadal triumphed 6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5), 6-7 (8), 9-7 after four hours and 48 minutes.

After the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Championships men’s singles final at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club on July 6, 2008, Federer congratulates Nadal.

What was unique about Nadal’s game?

The left-handed baseline player had a strong forehand and incredible topspin revolutions, which gave him an advantage, especially in longer rallies. Nadal will perhaps be best known for his tenacity, tirelessness and near-perfect game on clay, which earned him the title “King of Clay”.

What will Nadal do next?

For starters, he will let his body heal from the 23-year rigours of professional tennis. Nadal can then shift his attention to his renowned tennis academy in Mallorca, which Toni Nadal and his uncle, Toni Nadal, largely run.

How did Federer react to Nadal’s retirement?

The Swiss tennis legend claimed that Rafa’s retirement would never come as he had hoped.

“What a career, Rafa! I always hoped this day would never come”, the 20-time Grand Slam winner, who retired two years ago, said in a post on social media.

“Thank you for the incredible accomplishments you made in the game we love,” he said. It’s been an absolute honor”!

The “Fedal” conflict lasted for almost 20 years and came to an emotional end at the Laver Cup in September 2022.

Nadal edged out Federer in their head-to-head contests 24-16, coming out 6-3 on top in their Grand Slam finals. As Federer scurried into retirement, the two clasped their hands and shed tears.

Sep 23, 2022; London, United Kingdom; A tearful Roger Federer (SUI) and Rafael Nadal (ESP) look on after his last Laver Cup Tennis match. Mandatory Credit: Peter van den Berg-USA TODAY Sports
A tearful Federer and Nadal after Federer’s last tennis match at the Laver Cup on September 23, 2022]Peter van den Berg/USA Today Sports via Reuters]

What did other sports stars have to say about Nadal’s retirement?

Israeli forces fire on UN peacekeepers in Lebanon, wounding two

The Israeli military “repeatedly” fired at UNIFIL headquarters and positions in southern Lebanon, injuring two members of the peacekeeping force, the United Nations says, as Israel presses on with its assault on Hezbollah.

An Israeli tank “fired its weapon” at a guard tower at the UN Interim Force in Lebanon, according to UNIFIL, the UN Interim Force in the country, on Thursday, in the border town of Naqoura, killing two of its peacekeepers.

The two peacekeepers had fallen as a result of the tower attack. “The injuries are fortunately, this time, not serious, but they remain in hospital”, said UNIFIL in a statement.

The Israeli soldiers also fired on a UN position – named “1-31”- &nbsp, in the village of Labbouneh, “hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system”, it said.

An Israeli military drone flew inside the UN building up to the bunker entrance, according to the peacekeeping force.

On Wednesday, Israeli soldiers had “deliberately fired at and disabled” the position’s “monitoring cameras”, it said.

The Israeli military had also “deliberately fired” on a second UN position – named 1-32A – in the border area of Ras Naqoura, where regular meetings had been held before the conflict began, “damaging lighting and a relay station”, said UNIFIL.

The Israeli military, which is expanding its military operations in Lebanon against the Iran-linked Hezbollah armed group, did not respond immediately.

According to the Reuters news agency, neither of the two attacks on UN positions on Wednesday or Thursday left any casualties.

Hezbollah claimed earlier that it had fired guided missiles at an Israeli tank as it approached Ras Naqoura before shelling an Israeli force while the force was attempting to evacuate injured soldiers.

UNIFIL, which was established in 1978 and expanded following a 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, has about 10, 500 personnel, with major contributing nations including France, Italy, Indonesia, Malaysia and Ghana.

Since Israel and Hezbollah’s conflict escalated on September 23st, it has called for a ceasefire.

The UN peacekeepers’ security was “unacceptable” in terms of the Israeli military’s recent actions near a peacekeeping position in southwest Lebanon, according to the organization’s statement on Sunday.

In a letter to Israel’s military dated October 3 and seen by Reuters, &nbsp, UNIFIL&nbsp, had objected to Israeli military vehicles and troops positioning themselves “in immediate proximity” to UN positions, “thereby endangering the safety and security of&nbsp, UNIFIL&nbsp, personnel and premises”.

UNIFIL reaffirmed to the Israeli military on Thursday that any “deliberate attack” on peacekeepers “violates gravely international humanitarian law and Security Council resolution 1701.”