Netanyahu pledges to target opponents abroad after strike in Qatar

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to try to kill Hamas leaders in Qatar again if Doha does not expel the group’s officials, drawing a sharp response from Doha.

Unfazed by international outrage over the attack in the Qatari capital, Netanyahu said on Wednesday that countries should “applaud” Israel for its bombing and killing spree across the Middle East.

“I say to Qatar and all nations who harbour terrorists, you either expel them or you bring them to justice — because if you don’t, we will,” he said.

The comments came a day after Israel carried out an unprecedented attack in Qatar, targeting senior Hamas leadership in Doha as discussions on a US-backed ceasefire proposal for Gaza were under way.

In response, Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a condemnation of the Israeli prime minister’s comments, calling them a “shameful attempt … to justify the cowardly attack that targeted Qatari territory, as well as the explicit threats of future violations of state sovereignty”.

“Netanyahu is fully aware that the hosting of the Hamas office took place within the framework of Qatar’s mediation efforts requested by the United States and Israel,” it said.

“Such statements are hardly surprising coming from an individual who relies on extremist rhetoric to win elections and is wanted for international justice, facing mounting sanctions on a daily basis – factors that only deepen his isolation on the global stage.”

In just three days, Israel has launched attacks in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Tunisia and Qatar, while continuing daily raids in the occupied West Bank. On Wednesday, it killed 35 people in an attack in Yemen.

Last week, Israel was slammed for dropping grenades near the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon.

Al Jazeera’s Hamdah Salhut said, “Israel again has no problem meddling into the internal affairs of another country or violating international law, and the sovereignty of other nations by getting involved in military conflicts.

“We’ve seen it repeatedly in this region, but not just during the war on Gaza. We’ve seen it throughout Netanyahu’s political career, and Netanyahu is saying he’s going to take matters into his own hands.

“Israel doesn’t seem to care what the rest of the world are thinking – despite all the criticisms and violations of international law.”

‘This is state terror’

Separately on Wednesday, in an interview with CNN, Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani described Israel’s attack on Doha as “state terror”.

“I have no words to express how enraged we are from such an action … this is state terror,” Sheikh Mohammed said on Wednesday. “We are betrayed.”

The prime minister added that the United States has expressed its support for Qatar “on many occasions”.

Sheikh Mohammed added that Israel’s actions had “killed any hope” for the captives remaining in Gaza.

“I was meeting one of the hostages’ families the morning of the attack,” he said. “They are counting on this [ceasefire] mediation. They have no other hope for that.”

“I think that what [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has done yesterday, he just killed any hope for those hostages,” the prime minister added.

“He needs to be brought to justice,” Sheikh Mohammed said. “He’s the one who’s wanted at the [International Criminal Court or ICC].

“I think that someone like him trying to lecture about the law — he’s breaking every law — he broke every international law.”

Netanyahu, along with Israel’s former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, is accused by the ICC of war crimes related to Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Gulf states respond

Regional leaders have rushed to Doha in the aftermath of the strike. United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan met Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, while Jordan’s king and Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are also expected to arrive.

The attack has sent shock waves across the Gulf, with states that recently explored normalisation with Israel now rallying around Qatar.

“There is a response that will happen from the region,” Sheikh Mohammed said. “This response is currently under consultation and discussion with other partners in the region.”

He confirmed that an Arab-Islamic summit will be held in Doha in the coming days to decide on a course of action.

Banksy mural of UK judge hitting protester scrubbed from London court wall

Anonymous street artist Banksy’s mural showing a judge hitting a protester with a gavel has been removed from the wall of a court building in London two days after it was revealed, in what appeared to be a response to a crackdown on protests in solidarity with the Palestine Action campaign group.

Images shared by AP news agency on Wednesday showed a worker removing the new artwork by Banksy, which shows a bewigged judge bringing down a gavel on a protester sprawled on the ground, clutching a blood-stained placard, after it appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, the United Kingdom on Monday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

According to PA Media, work began to remove the image on Tuesday and resumed on Wednesday.

The mural appears to be a commentary on the mass arrests of people protesting the ban on the campaign group Palestine Action.

In July, Britain designated the activist network a “terrorist organisation” after its members stormed a Royal Air Force base and damaged military aircraft. Supporting or belonging to the group now carries criminal penalties.

An undated photo released by Banksy shows his new artwork portraying a judge beating a protester with a gavel at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, the UK [Banksy via AP]

But rights groups and campaigners have accused the British government of criminalising pro-Palestinian activism, saying the ban threatens the right to peaceful protest.

Lawyers and civil liberties advocates argue that proscribing Palestine Action sets a dangerous precedent for restricting activism on foreign policy issues, with Amnesty International calling the decision by the Labour government “a disturbing legal overreach”.

Campaigners have accused the Labour government led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer of allowing the export of military items to Israel. Amid mounting pressure, Starmer last month announced that the UK would recognise the state of Palestine.

Banksy has long used his work to highlight Palestinian struggles under Israeli occupation. His murals in the occupied West Bank include ones that depict a girl conducting a body search on an Israeli soldier, a dove wearing a flak jacket, and a masked protester hurling a bouquet.

Oracle’s Ellison surpasses Tesla’s Musk to be world’s richest man

Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison has wrested the title of the world’s richest person from longtime holder Elon Musk.

On Wednesday, as stock in Ellison’s software giant rocketed more than a third in a stunning few minutes of trading, Ellison’s net worth surpassed the Tesla CEO, according to wealth tracker Bloomberg. As of 3pm in New York (19:00 GMT), Oracle stock is up 34.4 percent for the day.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Ellison, 81, is now worth $393bn, according to Bloomberg. That is several billion more than Musk, who had been the world’s richest person for four years running. Stock in one of Musk’s biggest holdings, Tesla, has been moving in the opposite direction of Oracle’s, dropping 14 percent so far this year as of Tuesday.

The switch in the ranking came after a blockbuster earnings report from Oracle, powered by multibillion-dollar orders from customers as the AI race heats up.

Ellison’s net worth is largely derived from his 41 percent stake in Oracle.

Another news organisation with a long history of tallying the world’s richest, Forbes, still has Musk at the top, at $439bn. Bloomberg put his net worth at $385bn. The difference is in how the two estimate the value of Musk’s rocket company SpaceX, among other private holdings.

It comes as Tesla shareholders have offered Musk a $1 trillion compensation package.

With Ellison’s surging fortune on Wednesday, he could fund the lifestyles of five million US families for a year, about the entire population of Florida, allowing them to all quit their jobs, assuming the US median household income.

The price of mediation? How Qatar could respond to Israel’s attack

Doha, Qatar – The sight of plumes of smoke in the aftermath of Israeli bombings have become commonplace across the Middle East in recent months – but in the skyline of Qatar’s glitzy capital, it was wholly unprecedented.

Israel’s attack on Doha on Tuesday – the sixth country it has attacked this year – appeared to target the Palestinian group Hamas’s negotiating team, who were speculated at the time to be on the brink of closing a ceasefire deal for Gaza.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Qatar has played host to truce negotiations throughout the nearly two-year conflict, a leading mediator in the process – never a combatant. It is also a US ally, and the home of the US’s largest military base in the Middle East.

Israel ignored red lines to stage its attack in the densely populated area of Qatar’s capital, located near foreign embassies and schools, which killed five lower-ranked members of Hamas, as well as a Qatari Internal Security Force officer.

The attack has triggered a cascade of anger throughout Qatar’s government, which has condemned it as “state terrorism” and a “reckless criminal attack”.

“They see this as an act of cowardice and treachery,” Rashid al-Mohanadi, a nonresident fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, told Al Jazeera.

“Israel’s attempt to assassinate the [Hamas] negotiation team in the country of the mediator shows that the Israelis don’t have any seriousness when it comes to reaching a [ceasefire] settlement.”

The attack has not only called into question how Qatar might respond, but also the future of its well-established mediator role, as well as its defence alliances.

“This attack will be one of the important historical shocks that will lead Qatar and other GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] states to continue their pursuit of diversified partnerships and [to] further pursue strategic autonomy,” Sanam Vakil, the director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House, told Al Jazeera.

‘Straw that breaks the camel’s back’?

Qatar will likely leverage its role as a mediator in response to Israel’s attack, as its options are limited, according to Cinzia Bianco, a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

“Its main leverage is to pull back from the role it has been playing for years … and use that as leverage to say, look, if you [do] not respect the neutrality of mediation, then you can no longer count on us to mediate for this conflict,” Bianco told Al Jazeera.

However, Bianco added, this would likely only be useful in pushing the US to act, rather than Israel, which appears to have little interest in agreeing to a ceasefire deal.

Qatar could also use economic pressure against Israel, said al-Mohanadi.

“All options are on the table and economic pressure can be imposed on the allies of Israel, namely Europe and the US,” if they do not take serious steps to stop Israel, al-Mohanadi said. Qatar has billions of dollars worth of investments in Europe and the US.

Vakil suggests that Arab states could use their diplomatic influence to urge Western allies to implement effective constraints on Israel’s actions.

“Israel has struck seven countries in the Middle East, and hitting Qatar – I think, [it] could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back for Israel,” she said.

Vakil added that the Trump administration might apply more direct pressure on Israel, which is ultimately what Arab states, including Qatar, hope to see to prevent further security threats.

Furthermore, Qatar has the option of going to the United Nations to diplomatically isolate Israel. An emergency UN Security Council meeting will take place on Thursday in response to Israel’s attack, following requests from Algeria, Pakistan, and other nations, according to diplomatic sources.

On Wednesday, Doha also announced the creation of a legal team headed by Qatari diplomat Mohammed bin Abdulaziz al-Khulaifi, “to take all legal measures against the treacherous Israeli attack, considering it an assault on the state’s sovereignty and a flagrant violation of international law, conventions, and norms”.

Despite its limited options for a response, in al-Mohanadi’s view, Qatar is unlikely to abandon its mediator role and will continue to push for a ceasefire through the use of multilateral organisations like the UN Security Council.

“Qatar will never cease to be the mediator, because mediation is literally in [Qatar’s] constitution,” al-Mohanadi said, adding that the attack will only be a “dent” in the role it has assumed in many conflicts for the past decade.

Qatar has served as a mediator in various international conflicts, facilitating peace discussions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, spearheading initiatives to reunite Ukrainian children displaced by the Russian war, and acting as a crucial intermediary in Afghan peace and humanitarian negotiations by hosting talks with the Taliban.

Eleonora Ardemagni, a senior associate research fellow at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI), agrees that while there is an “extremely narrow” window for Gaza ceasefire negotiations at the moment, Qatar will continue to play its mediator role. US-Qatar ties, however, have been blighted by the attack.

“Qatar is aware that it can’t become the place where other powers in the region settle accounts – this is about … national security,” Ardemagni told Al Jazeera.

“US deterrence is no longer able to guarantee security for Qatar, as well as for the other GCC states.”

The strike, therefore, leaves Qatar in a difficult position when it comes to hosting Hamas’s political leadership, said the analysts.

“I don’t think that we are going to see an immediate eviction of Hamas’s leadership – that would appear to show weakness or [play] into Israel’s hands,” said Vakil.

Qatar will rather look for assurances from the US, given that “Qatar supported Hamas with the blessing of the United States many years ago and with the blessing of Israel,” said Vakil.

Qatari officials have repeatedly stated that the decision to host the Hamas leadership came after a request from the US.

In a 2023 opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, the Qatari ambassador to the US, Sheikh Meshal bin Hamad Al Thani, said that Washington wanted the office “to establish indirect lines of communication with Hamas”.

While the analysts concurred that Hamas leadership would not face immediate expulsion from Doha, Bianco indicated there is a “strong chance” Qatar will reconsider hosting the group.

Following international backlash after Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, Doha had already been evaluating this risk, but chose to maintain the relationship to help resolve the Gaza conflict, she explained.

“But if the price to be paid is that … they themselves become targets, I think, [it will] probably no longer [be] worth it,” said Bianco, noting that any relocation would likely be a coordinated, consensual transfer of the group to another location.

Security diversification and soft power blows

Tuesday’s attack will likely accelerate Qatar’s – and the broader Gulf countries’ – pursuit of diversified security arrangements, according to al-Mohanadi.

That could mean building up their own collective defence capabilities or seeking security partnerships with actors like China, he said.

“What happened yesterday was not [just a] breach on Qatar, it was a breach on the entire GCC, which was always off limits,” said the analyst.

The extent of this diversification will hinge on the US response to the attack, he added.

However, as a major non-NATO ally of the US, Qatar’s defence posture changes will likely emerge gradually rather than immediately, Vakil pointed out.

“There are not too many options for Qatar for it to pivot and move somewhere else … Over the long term, Qatar will look to forge or diversify bilateral and multilateral relationships,” she explained.

The analysts predict Gulf countries will unite over shared concerns about regional destabilisation.

“With the Iranian attack against Al Udeid first and now with the Israeli strike on Doha, something has changed in the perception that Gulf leaders have about the future,” said Ardemagni, referring to Iran’s attack in June on the Al Udeid airbase in Qatar, the largest US military base in the Middle East.

“There’s a growing sense of Gulf identity and unity vis-a-vis external attacks. I see a rise of patriotism and the sense of [a] national unity … among Qatari residents and citizens.”

While the analysts agree that Qatar’s international investments – from London real estate holdings to ownership of European football clubs – will remain unaffected, Israel’s actions have dealt a blow to Qatar’s domestic soft power ambitions.

Fired FBI officials sue Trump administration for ‘illegal retribution’

Former FBI Acting Director Brian Driscoll and two other former senior officials who were fired without cause last month have sued the administration of US President Donald Trump, alleging they were dismissed in a “campaign of retribution” that targeted officials viewed as insufficiently loyal.

The complaint asserts that FBI Director Kash Patel indicated directly to one of the ousted agents, Brian Driscoll, that he knew the firings were “likely illegal” but was powerless to stop them because the White House and the Justice Department were determined to remove all agents who had helped in investigations surrounding Trump.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“The FBI tried to put the president in jail and he hasn’t forgotten it,” Patel told Driscoll, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Driscoll, Steve Jensen and Spencer Evans, three of five agents known to have been fired last month in a purge that current and former officials say has unnerved the workforce.

It represents a legal challenge from the top rungs of the FBI’s leadership ladder to a flood of departures under Trump’s Republican administration that has wiped out decades of experience. Fired agents have levelled unflattering allegations against a law enforcement agency whose personnel moves are shaped by the White House and guided more by politics than by public safety.

“Patel not only acted unlawfully but deliberately chose to prioritize politicizing the FBI over protecting the American people,” the suit says. “His decision to do so degraded the country’s national security by firing three of the FBI’s most experienced operational leaders, each of them experts in preventing terrorism and reducing violent crime.”

Spokespeople for the FBI declined to comment on the lawsuit, as they also did after the agents were ousted.

Concerns of reputational damage

The suit was filed in federal court in Washington, where judges and grand juries have pushed back against Trump administration initiatives and charging decisions. It names as defendants Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi, as well as the FBI, the Justice Department and the Executive Office of the President.

Besides reinstatement, the suit seeks, among other remedies, the awarding of back pay, an order declaring the firings illegal and even a forum for them to clear their names. It notes that Patel, in a Fox News Channel interview two weeks after the terminations, said “every single person” found to have weaponised the FBI had been removed from leadership positions, even though the suit says there’s no indication any of the three had done so.

“This false and defamatory public smear impugned the professional reputation of each of the Plaintiffs, suggesting they were something other than faithful and apolitical law enforcement officials, and has caused not only the loss of the Plaintiffs’ present government employment but further harmed their future employment prospects,” the suit states.

Unnerving requests from leadership

The three fired officials, according to the lawsuit, had participated in and supervised some of the FBI’s most complex work, including international terrorism investigations.

“They were pinnacles of what the rank-and-file aspired to, and now the FBI has been deprived not only of that example but has been deprived of very important operational competence,” said Chris Mattei, one of the agents’ lawyers. “Their firing from the FBI, taken together, has put every American at greater risk than when Brian Driscoll, Steve Jensen and Spencer Evans were in positions of leadership.”

Right-wing activist Charlie Kirk shot at US university

DEVELOPING STORY,

Charlie Kirk, the CEO and co-founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point USA, was shot at an event at a Utah college, Turning Point said.

“We are confirming that he was shot and we are praying for Charlie,” said Aubrey Laitsch, public relations manager for Turning Point USA, on Wednesday.

Video of the incident circulating on social media showed Kirk addressing a large outdoor crowd when a loud crack that sounded like a gunshot rang out. Kirk can be seen briefly moving his hand to his neck as he falls off his chair, sending the attendees running.

“A shot was fired from a nearby building, and we have a suspect in custody,” a university spokesperson told Reuters in an email.

US President Donald Trump also mentioned the shooting on social media.

“We must all pray for Charlie Kirk, who has been shot. A great guy from top to bottom. GOD BLESS HIM!” he wrote.

FBI Director Kash Patel said his office was monitoring the shooting.

“Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the ongoing response and investigation,” he wrote on X.

The shooting comes amid a spike in political violence in the United States across all parts of the ideological spectrum.

The attacks include the assassination of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband at their house in June, the firebombing of a Colorado parade to demand Hamas release hostages, and a fire set at the house of Pennsylvania’s governor, who is Jewish, in April. The most notorious of these events is the shooting of President Donald Trump during a campaign rally last year.