EU squeezes Russia financially to reach ‘peace through strength’ in Ukraine

By the end of 2027, the European Commission has unveiled a plan to completely stop imports of Russian gas.

The Group of Seven summit’s final day in Canada’s Kananaskis resort on Tuesday would immediately impose new contracts to purchase Russian gas. By the end of 2027, it would cut short any long-term contracts and allow existing short-term contracts to expire by June 2027.

Ursula von der Leyen, Commission President, stated that “to achieve peace through strength, we must put more pressure on Russia to secure a real ceasefire, bring Russia to the bargaining table, and put an end to this war.” To accomplish that goal, sanctions are essential.

As part of the unveiling of the plan, Russia launched 32 missiles and 440 drones into Kyiv, killing 26 people and injuring 134. Railway infrastructure was impacted and the fires were sparked by the attack. Additionally, Odesa suffered a lot.

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, deliberately does this right before the G7 summit. Andrii Sybiha, the country’s foreign minister, said it was a clear sign of total disrespect for the United States and other countries that call for the end of the conflict.

Following a call with Trump on Sunday, Putin immediately sent 183 strike drones and 11 different type missiles into Ukraine.

(Al Jazeera)

The commission claims that during the war, the European Union’s imports of Russian energy have fallen by almost 80%. However, last year, it purchased about 22% of its oil and 20% of its gas from Russia for about 22 billion euros ($25bn).

According to a recent study from the Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air, the Kremlin would lose 22 percent of its gross income if it were to stop receiving that money.

The main opposition groups have been Hungary and Slovakia, who have voiced opposition to a complete import ban. They contend that there aren’t many alternatives to Russian oil and gas because of their landlocked status.

Because Ukraine shut down the Yamal pipeline, which transports Russian gas from Ukraine to Slovakia, in January, Slovak Premier Robert Fico referred to Volodymyr Zelenskyy as “an enemy of Slovakia.” TurkStream is the only remaining functioning Russian pipeline through Europe.

Hungary vetoed a statement of support for the ban the day before the commission’s announcement.

In 2022, the EU planned to impose a ban on Russian imports of coal and oil, and it has since begun.

By threatening to uninsure tankers selling more than that amount, the EU and the G7 also announced a $60 per barrel cap on Russian oil for sales to anyone else in the world in December 2022.

Estonian Kaja Kallas, then-premier and current EU head of foreign policy, wrote on Twitter, “It is no secret that we wanted the price to be lower.” She said that a price between $30 and $40 would significantly damage Russia.

This week, there was rumor that the EU and the G7 would lower the cap to $45.

Because of the fact that Moscow would still generate an estimated 215 billion euros ($248bn) from sales to other countries even if the EU did not stop buying Russian energy.

However, the EU announced that the initiative was being halted as a result of rising energy costs, partially as a result of Israel’s war against Iran.

Von der Leyen told reporters on the G7 meeting that the current $60 cap “had little effect” despite the price of oil, “but in the last days, we have seen that the oil price has increased]and] the cap in place serves its purpose. There is therefore little pressure to lower the oil price cap at the moment.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, disagreed. Moscow will suddenly sound peaceful, he wrote on the Telegram messaging platform. “If Russian oil is sold for no more than $30 per barrel, then it will suddenly sound peaceful.”

Without a profit margin, Russia’s extraction costs are estimated to be what it will pay to start war prosecutions.

identifying the flaws

Russia partially escaped the oil cap by purchasing a “shadow fleet” of tankers that were not insured in the G7 and EU. The UK approved 20 tankers on Tuesday in addition to the 100 that were last month. Australia’s first targeted sanctions against the shadow fleet were imposed on 60 vessels the day after they were put in place.

Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from the US, announced on Friday that he and Republican Senator Richard Blumenthal were working with the Trump administration to put together a sanctions package that would impose secondary sanctions on nations that still import Russian energy.

A bill to impose severe sanctions and tariffs on Russia and its financial backers has more than 84 co-sponsors in the Senate and 70 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, Graham wrote in a column.

On April 1, there were 50 senators who had risen to that number. Trump has opposed sanctions, preferring to annoy Putin over to cajole him.

In a Saturday interview with US outlet Newsmax, Zelenskyy decried that approach.

He said that the conversation between America and Russia today resembled a warm conversation. This won’t stop Putin, let’s be clear. It is necessary to change the tone. Putin must be aware that the United States will support Ukraine, including by imposing sanctions and supporting our military.

According to Politico, the EU was also considering moving about 200 billion euros worth of frozen Russian assets from Belgium’s “special purpose fund” from the Euroclear system.

The Belgian central bank, which is secure but offers low returns, is where Euroclear can only make investments right now. The new fund would be able to make riskier investments, which might result in more money being invested in helping Ukraine.

Small victories and astronomical losses

Over the past week, Russia has continued to attack Ukrainian positions with little success.

According to Zelenskyy, the Russian offensive’s day 18 or 19 was intended to bring about a breakthrough for Ukraine and Russia. He claimed that the Ukrainian side had defeated a significant portion of the Russian advance, preventing unification of Russian forces.

On Saturday, Russian forces took control of the village of Horikhove in the eastern Donetsk region of Ukraine.

That and other Russian incremental gains have had a significant impact on life.

On June 12, British Defense Intelligence estimated that Russia had lost a million lives, with 40 to 50 percent likely irrecoverable losses, including those who had been killed, missing, presumed dead, or were irrevocably injured, according to estimates from the country’s Defence Intelligence.

In the first five months of this year, around 200, 000 of those casualties were thought to have been caused, which suggests Russia’s casualty rate is rising.

Russian casualties have roughly doubled each year since the start of the war, according to the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War.

According to the Ukrainian General Staff, 340 casualties were reported daily in 2022 by Russian forces, up from 693 in 2023 and 1,177 in 2024. Russian daily casualties have reached 1, 286 on average this year.

INTERACTIVE-WHO CONTROLS WHAT IN SOUTHERN UKRAINE-1750265366

INTERACTIVE-WHO CONTROLS WHAT IN EASTERN UKRAINE copy-1750265356
(Al Jazeera)

Pro-Palestinian activists break into UK military base

In a show of support for Israel’s occupation of Gaza, pro-Palestinian activists claimed to have damaged two military aircraft and entered a Royal Air Force base in central England in protest of the UK government’s support for Israel’s occupation of Gaza.

Two members of the political party, according to Palestine Action, sprayed paint on the engines of the Voyager aircraft and launched crowbars into their positions at the RAF Brize Norton military base in Oxfordshire.

The organization stated in a statement on Friday that the Israeli government was still receiving military cargo, flying spy planes over Gaza, and replenishing U.S./Israeli fighter jets, and posted a video of the incident on X.

Britain plays a significant role in the Middle East’s genocide and war crimes, according to the statement.

Two people were spotted passing through the Brize Norton base while riding electric scooters in the video. The turbine engines were then sprayed with red paint using recycled fire extinguishers.

The runway was covered in red paint that “symbolized Palestinian bloodshed,” according to the group.

The activists were able to leave the military compound without being arrested, according to the statement.

In a post on X, Prime Minister Keir Starmer criticized the “vandalism” as “disgraceful.”

The incident was being investigated by the police and the ministry of defense.

“The best of Britain’s armed forces are ours,” says one spokesman. They sacrificed their lives for us, and they inspire us all through their service, selfless sacrifice, and dedication,” according to a ministry statement.

“We have a duty to support those who defend us,” we said.

Pro-Palestine campaigners gathered earlier this month in London to demand a full arms embargo and harsh sanctions against the Israeli government.

Following the government’s announcement of a temporary arms suspension in September 2024, the UK-based Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) discovered that the UK increased its Israeli military equipment licensing.

Is Trump planning an ‘Africa visa ban’?

According to US media reports, citing internal and government documents, Donald Trump could significantly increase his list of countries with a travel ban in the next few weeks to 36 more. 26 of those are in Africa.

With 10 countries already included on Trump’s initial list, citizens of 36 of Africa’s 54 nations could now be banned, fully or partially, from entering the US if the new list takes effect. In terms of traveling to the US, Africa would become the most dangerous region in the world due to this.

The visa bans are a result of Trump’s promised immigration crackdown, which has already been in place since he took office in January and has already severely restricted access to citizens of 19 African and Middle Eastern nations.

In a memorandum sent to US representatives in the affected countries on June 14, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the governments of those countries had been given 60 days to meet standards dictated by the Department of State. In addition, the memo requested that those nations provide a preliminary action plan in accordance with those goals by June 18.

The deadline has now passed. It is unclear if any of those countries have submitted the requested plans of action.

What are the current information and potential travel bans for Africa:

What number of African nations are included in the list?

Of the 36 new countries mentioned in the reported memo, 26 are in Africa: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Djibouti, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Antigua and Barbuda, Bhutan, Cambodia, Dominica, Kyrgyzstan, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Syria, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu are other countries on the list, along with those in the Caribbean, Asia, the Pacific, and the Middle East.

According to the memo, nations that fail to adequately address concerns raised by the Trump administration may be advised for bans as soon as August.

Seven African countries were included on Trump’s first list of 12 countries completely banned from entering the US from June 4. Somalia, Chad, Libya, Eritrea, Equatorial Guinea, Sudan, and the Republic of Congo. Sierra Leone, Burundi, and Togo are three more countries on a separate list of seven nations that are currently subject to limited US visa opportunities for their citizens.

This brings the total to 36 of Africa’s 54 countries on a potential ban list for travel to the US.

On June 6, 2025, a client at Els Beauty Salon in Miami’s Little Haiti neighborhood, barber Charlemagne Merilien, who moved to the US to support his wife and five children who are still living there, cuts their hair.

Why does Trump impose restrictions on African nation citizens?

Saturday’s memo gave a wide range of reasons for a potential ban on the countries affected. Instead of providing specific justifications for each nation, it warned that each country had been flagged for a different reason.

According to one reason, some of the nations have been “sponsors of terrorism” or have citizens who have “been involved in acts of terrorism in the United States.” Others, as per the memo, do not have a credible “government authority to produce reliable identity documents”, have unreliable criminal records, or sell citizenship to people who do not live in their countries.

As well as the fact that some countries’ citizens frequently overstay their visas, there are also concerns about the state’s unwillingness to cooperate when resuming their deportation from the US.

According to the memo, the affected nations could address US concerns by agreeing to accept back deported people from other nations or agreeing to establish a “safe third country” where they will accept asylum seekers. Mineral-rich DRC proposed such a deal to the White House in March.

Trump stated in a video message from the White House in early June that the recent attack on a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado “underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreigners who are not properly vetted.”

Egyptian national Mohamed Sabry Soliman, who also resided in Kuwait, has since been detained and accused of a federal hate crime and a number of other state offenses. His wife and five children are presently detained by US immigration officials. Kuwait is not among the nations that are currently facing visa bans, but Egypt is currently being considered for a ban.

Trump has previously outlawed citizens of other nations, which critics claim are frequently low- and non-white. During his first presidential term, a controversial and highly-challenged policy, which came to be known as the “Muslim ban”, saw seven Muslim-majority countries on a red list that later expanded to include some low-income African nations. When he took office in 2021, former president Joe Biden voided the ban.

Chad's President Mahamat Idriss Deby is welcomed by French President Emmanuel Macron and European Council President Charles Michel during the European Union - African Union summit in Brussels, Belgium
Idriss Deby, president of the Chad, is greeted by Emmanuel Macron (right), president of the EU, Charles Michel, and Emmanuel Macron (CEO) of the former European Council in Brussels, Belgium, on February 17, 2022.

How many people from African countries live in the US?

According to data from the US-based Migration Policy Institute, about two million of the country’s 44 million immigrants are from Africa. According to the US Census Bureau, nearly half of African immigrants immigrated to the US after 2010, making them the fastest-growing segment in recent years.

Many African immigrants are highly educated with one or more degrees, and represent the largest immigrant group in the labour force, the bureau reported. About 61 percent of Americans have naturalized citizenship.

According to data from the Migration Policy Institute, the number of immigrant immigrants in each country was broken down between 1960 and 2023.

  • Nigeria – 476, 000
  • Ethiopia: 278; 200
  • 241, 000 in Ghana
  • Egypt – 225, 665
  • Liberia: 100, 800, and 800
  • Somalia: 92, 400
  • Cameroon – 90, 700
  • DRC: 62, 500
  • 49 and 755 Eritrea
  • Sierra Leone – 45, 532
  • 40 and 420 respectively, Tanzania
  • 37, 000 Togo
  • Cabo Verde – 31, 441
  • Senegal – 28 / 581
  • Ivory Coast – 25 / 426
  • Zimbabwe – 24, 490

What possible effects might these people have?

According to experts, Trump’s travel bans are likely to leave many Americans uneasy.

Michelle Mittelstadt, director of communications at the Migration Policy Institute, told Al Jazeera at the time of the first travel ban announcement: “For citizens of these countries living in the US who are not naturalised citizens, the travel ban most likely will freeze them in place, as many will be fearful that they might not be permitted re-entry if they leave the US temporarily”.

Due to the immobility that many citizens of these nations will experience as well as the inability to travel legally to the US or apply for a permanent or temporary visa, Mittelstadt added, “a family ban could split.”

How frequently do people from these nations visit the US?

According to Statista, about 588, 177 visitors from Africa travelled to the US in 2024. There is no record of a country-by-country historical breakdown.

No African nation is listed among the top 20 nations visiting the US this year, according to US Department of Commerce data. About 100, 000 visitors have been recorded so far, from the African continent, mostly from:

  • 24 800 South Africa
  • Nigeria: 18 093
  • Egypt – 13, 376
  • Ghana – 7 018
  • 5 / 409 / Kenya

How are African countries responding to the looming US visa ban?

Yusuf Tuggar, the country’s foreign minister, warned this week that if citizens of West African nations are barred, the US might miss out on important and rare earth mineral deals.

In a meeting with his counterparts, Tuggar, who currently chairs the regional bloc Economic Community of West Africa’s (ECOWAS) council of foreign ministers, said, “This would be most unfortunate if it comes to pass.” He cited Nigeria’s reserves of oil and gas. Tanalite and uranium are both abundant in the nation.

According to Sarang Shidore, director of the US think tank Quincy Institute’s Global South program, visa bans are comparable to “building walls” between the US and targeted regions.

“Africa, particularly, is important to the United States as it is a site of natural resources, a growing market, and a talented population”, Shidore said. Washington should look for other, non-militarized ways to demonstrate its commitment to bolstering relations with African states if it wants to restrain migration and travel from the continent.

Trump has in fact shown a desire to negotiate lucrative deals for rare earth minerals, which are essential for the production of batteries for electric vehicles and smartphones.

For example, Washington and Beijing are set to sign an agreement that will see China provide rare earth elements and minerals crucial for manufacturing tech gadgets and weapons, in exchange for continued access to US schools for Chinese students, according to a social media post by Trump last week.

In exchange for aid in the country’s reconstruction after the Russian-Russian conflict ends, the US also announced a deal last month with Ukraine over rare earth minerals.

Chad responded to the inclusion of the first travel ban list by suspending US citizens’ visas when it first became available at the beginning of June. In a Facebook post, President Idriss Deby said: “I have instructed the government to act in accordance with the principles of reciprocity and suspend the issuance of visas to US citizens”.

The US Department of Homeland Security’s most recent statistics revealed that 49.5 percent of visitors to the country had the highest visa overstay rate.

Other affected African countries have adopted a more amiable tone.

Sierra Leone’s Information Minister Chernor Bah said in a statement that his country was ready to cooperate with the US. What else can we do, in our opinion? How can we work together with our US partners, who we trust will maintain a positive relationship, he said.

Trump’s initial proclamation in early June said Sierra Leone, which is now subject to partial restrictions, “has historically failed to accept back its removable nationals”.

Dahir Hassan, Somalia’s ambassador to the US, stated that the East African nation wanted to cooperate with the US. He stated that “Somalia values its long-standing relationship with the United States and is willing to talk through the issues raised.”

Trump’s proclamation described Somalia as “a terrorist safe haven” and stated: “Somalia lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures”.

Meanwhile, the African Union urged the US to engage in more constructive dialogue and dialogue with African countries in order to maintain what it claimed were historically close ties in a statement released on June 5.

US appeals court rules Trump can keep control of California National Guard

A United States appeals court has ruled the administration of President Donald Trump could keep control of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom.

The decision on Thursday comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions in California’s largest city, which has become ground zero of Trump’s immigration crackdown across the US.

In a 38-page unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel said Trump was within his rights earlier this month when he ordered 4,000 members of the National Guard into service for 60 days to “protect federal personnel performing federal functions and to protect federal property”.

“Affording appropriate deference to the President’s determination, we conclude that he likely acted within his authority in federalising the National Guard,” the panel of the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeal said.

Trump, a Republican, had appointed two of the judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel while his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, had named the third, according to US media reports.

Last week, a lower court judge had ordered Trump to return control of the California National Guard to Newsom, saying the president’s decision to deploy them during protests over federal immigration detentions in Los Angeles was “illegal”. That decision by US District Judge Charles Breyer on June 12 prompted the appeal.

On Thursday night, Trump hailed the appeal court’s decision in a post on his Truth Social social media platform, calling it a “BIG WIN”.

“All over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,” Trump wrote.

‘Not a king’

The state of California had argued that Trump’s order was illegal because it did not follow the procedure of being issued through the governor.

It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state governor.

The judges said Trump’s “failure to issue the federalisation order directly ‘through’ the Governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard”.

But they said the panel disagreed with the defendant’s primary argument that the president’s decision to federalise members of the California National Guard “is completely insulated from judicial review”.

“Nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage,” it wrote in its opinion.

Newsom could still challenge the use of the National Guard and Marines under other laws, including the bar on using troops in domestic law enforcement, it added.

The governor could raise those issues at a court hearing on Friday in front of Breyer, it also said.

In a social media post after the decision, Newsom promised to pursue his challenge.

“Donald Trump is not a king and not above the law,” he wrote.

“Tonight, the court rightly rejected Trump’s claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court.

Taiwan detects dozens of Chinese aircraft near island after UK ship patrol

In the last 24 hours, Taiwan’s defense ministry reported that it had seen more than 70 Chinese military aircraft flying through the island, just as a British naval vessel passed through the troubled Taiwan Strait.

Beijing has been using fighter jets and naval vessels to further Taiwan’s claim to be the island’s sovereignship in recent months, which Taipei rejects.

Six Chinese naval vessels were discovered in the 24 hours to 6am on Friday (22:00 GMT on Thursday), according to the defense ministry.

The ministry reported in a separate statement that an additional 24 Chinese aircraft, including fighters and drones, had been spotted since Friday at 8:50 am (00:50 GMT).

According to the ministry, 15 of the second batch of aircraft “monitored the situation and responded accordingly” by flying over the Taiwan Strait’s median line while conducting air-sea joint training with Chinese naval vessels.

Taiwan, which is a democratic, self-governing nation, is a part of China’s territory, and it has threatened to use force to take it under its control. Beijing is enraged that Taiwan has allied itself with the US.

The most recent incursions occurred on June 18 when the HMS Spey, a patrol ship for the British Royal Navy, passed through Taiwan Strait, according to the foreign ministry.

China scolded Britain’s most recent action as a blatant “cause trouble” attempt.

The patrol vessel’s routine navigation, according to Britain’s Royal Navy, took place in full compliance with international law as part of a long-planned deployment.

The ship’s Wednesday sailing was “public hyping,” according to the People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theatre Command, and its forces followed and monitored the Spey.

The 180-kilometer (112-mile) Taiwan Strait is considered to be open water for all vessels in the eyes of the UK, the US, and other nations.

A US destroyer and US ocean survey ship made their way through the Strait in February, but a Canadian warship did the same.

The HMS Richmond, a frigate deployed with Britain’s aircraft carrier strike group, sailed through Japan to Vietnam in 2021, the last time a British Navy ship traversed the Taiwan Strait.

When Beijing conducted live-fire exercises that included simulated strikes against the island’s key ports and energy sites, Taiwan detected 76 Chinese aircraft and 15 naval vessels around the island in April.

Israel again included in UN blacklist for grave violations against children

Israel has been placed on the UN’s “blacklist” of nations that engage in child abuse in armed conflict for the second year in a row as its conflict with Gaza drags on for nearly 20 months.

The UN reported on Thursday that violence against children in conflict zones reached “unprecedented levels,” with the Israeli army committing the most violations in the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank.

According to the annual report on children in armed conflict, “a staggering” 25 percent increase in grave crimes against children under the age of 18 was reported in the world’s 2023 annual report. It claimed to have verified 41, 370 grave crimes against children, including those committed by children, including those committed in hospitals and schools, and those committed by children.

In Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, 8, 554 grave crimes were committed against 2, 959 children, including 2 944 Palestinians and 15 Israelis.

In Gaza, which has been repeatedly bombarded by Israeli forces as a result of an attack led by the Palestinian group Hamas in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, 1, 259 Palestinian children were killed and 941 were injured, according to the figures.

The UN said it is currently reviewing information on an additional 4, 470 children killed in the besieged territory in 2024, and the Gaza-based ministry of health has released much higher figures.

The UN confirmed the killing of 97 Palestinian children in occupied West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem, where 3, 688 violations were documented, in addition to the UN’s verification of that report.

Additionally, the report praised Israel’s military operations in Lebanon, where more than 500 children perished or were injured last year.

In response to the widespread use of explosive weapons in populated areas, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed his concern over the “intensity of grave violations against children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel.”

Guterres also reiterated his demands on Israel to abide by international law, which forbids special protections for children, protection for schools and hospitals, and compliance with the law that allows attacks to distinguish between fighters and civilians, and to prevent excessive harm to innocent people.

Israel’s UN mission made no immediate comment.

The Palestinian Islamic Jihad group’s armed wing, Hamas, Qassam Brigades, and al-Quds Brigades, were also listed on the blacklist a second time.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (more than 4, 000 grave violations), Somalia (more than 2, 500), Nigeria (nearly 2, 500), and Haiti (more than 2, 200) were the following nations, according to the UN, which had the highest rate of violence against children in 2024.