‘Illegal in own homes’: Afghan refugees caught in Pakistan-Taliban tensions

The millions of Afghans who fled their home countries after the then-Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 were a part of Allah Meer’s family in Islamabad, Pakistan.

In Kohat, in northwest Pakistan, his family made their home. Meer, now 45, was born there. More than 200 members of his extended family have traveled to Pakistan, Meer claims, from Afghanistan to Pakistan, where they have resided ever since.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The family has feared for its future over the past two years because Pakistan has returned hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees, but they have escaped Islamabad’s dragnet.

As part of the campaign it started in 2023 to expel what it calls “illegal foreigners,” Pakistan announced last week that it would close all 54 Afghan refugee villages nationwide. Among these are the Kohat villages where Meer and his family reside.

“In my entire life, I only went to Afghanistan once, for two weeks in 2013. None of my family has ever returned, Meer told Al Jazeera. When we were born here, lived here, married here, and buried here, how can I ruin everything?

Families like Meer’s are caught in a jumble of uncertainty as a result of increased tensions between Pakistan and the Taliban, which re-established control of Afghanistan in 2021.

Early in October, fighting broke out between Afghan and Pakistani forces along the border, causing tense relations to turn into open hostility. Officials from both parties met on Sunday in Qatar’s capital, Doha, and agreed to a ceasefire. The next round of negotiations is scheduled for Istanbul on October 25.

However, tensions continue to be high. And Meer’s family worries that border neighbors could use them as diplomatic pawns in a border conflict.

From welcome to expulsion

Since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan has housed countless Afghan refugees. Afghans fled across the border as the Taliban first came to power in Afghanistan in 1996, and successive waves of Afghans did so.

Following the September 11 attacks on the US, the Taliban’s fall led to the return of thousands of Afghans. However, their return was brief.

Another 600, 000 to 800, 000 Afghans sought refuge in Pakistan after the Taliban’s stunning comeback in August 2021.

Pakistan, which was once the Taliban’s top ally, claimed that Afghanistan held armed organizations responsible for the cross-border attacks as relations between Kabul and Islamabad deteriorated over the past four years. Even those who have resided in the country for decades, like Meer, were hampered by the government’s stance toward Afghan refugees.

As he prepares to travel to Afghanistan in August to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) repatriation center in Nowshera, Pakistan [Fayaz Aziz/Reuters]

Meer, a 10-year-old father, founded a vocational training program for Afghan refugee children funded by the UNHCR. She graduated from a university in Peshawar with a degree in education.

To document Afghan citizens living in Pakistan, the UNHCR has issued Proof of Registration (PR) cards since 2006. They have access to some government services, including bank accounts, as well as some legal residence with these cards, which also restrict their freedom of movement.

However, the Pakistani government has discontinued and invalidated existing PoR cards as of June 30 this year.

We all have Proof of Residence cards issued by UNHCR, but with the current drive, Meer said, “I don’t know what will happen.”

Afghan nationals who are undocumented in the country were first given Afghan citizenship cards (ACC) in 2017 and were given identification credentials to give them temporary legal status.

However, the ACC no longer offers deportation protection.

Between the start of the campaign in 2023 and the middle of October 2025, more than 1.5 million Afghans voluntarily or by force left Pakistan, according to the UNHCR.

“Illegal in our home,” the phrase.

According to Qaiser Khan Afridi, the UNHCR’s representative in Pakistan, there are approximately 1.2 million PoR card holders, 737, 000 ACC holders, and 115, 000 asylum seekers.

Their status has become more precarious as a result of Pakistan’s tensions with the Taliban.

Afridi claimed that Pakistan has exhibited extraordinary generosity by hosting millions of Afghan refugees for over 45 years. However, the government’s decision to ban refugee camps throughout Pakistan and to encourage their relocation to Afghanistan is deeply concerning.

“Many of the people affected have lived here for years and are now concerned about their future.” We advocate that any return be gradual, ostensibly carried out, and in a sense of dignity and security.

More than 100 000 people live in seven refugee villages in Kohat alone, according to Meer, who has worked for the UNHCR for years. He claimed that Pakistan and Afghanistan both abused their political leverage to influence the refugee situation.

Our family members have sat down to discuss options in light of the most recent circumstance. We considered sending some of our young men to Afghanistan to look for homes and ways to conduct business, but the problem is that we have no connections there, he said.

His PoR card has been removed from all public places because the Pakistani government has now declared it invalid, making it difficult for him to even use medical facilities when his children need medical care.

He claimed that “we are, in the best way, considered illegal in a nation where I and my children reside.”

entangled between borders

Late in 2023, Pakistan’s plan to expel Afghan residents came about as rebe attacks increased. Since then, there has been a rise in violence, with 2025 likely to be the year with the highest level of violence.

Afghan refugees are a security risk, according to Pakistani authorities, who accuse the Taliban government of abridging armed groups. Kabul refutes this claim.

Sarfraz Bugti, Pakistan’s then interior minister, claimed that Afghan nationals carried out 14 of the country’s 24 suicide bombings in 2023. He did not elaborate on whether the individuals were Afghan nationals who had crossed the porous border between the two nations or refugees who were living there.

Given the hostility between the neighbours, Meer fears that Afghan refugees in Pakistan will also be misunderstood there.

He predicted that “we will also be seen as Pakistanis and as enemies there.”

Pakistan should reconsider its repatriation drive, according to Afridi, the UNHCR spokesperson.

UNHCR calls on the government to take steps to prevent Afghans from returning to their homes without permission, he said.

India’s Kohli, Rohit will regain form after Perth ODI defeat, says Ponting

AI models misrepresent news events nearly half the time, study says

According to a study, AI models like ChatGPT frequently misrepresent news events, giving incorrect answers to questions almost always.

The accuracy of more than 2,700 responses from OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Copilot, and Perplexity was evaluated by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the BBC on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Between late May and early June, 22 public media outlets, each representing 18 nations and 14 languages, posed a set of common questions to the AI assistants.

According to the research, 45 percent of responses were accompanied by at least one “significant” issue.

The most frequent issue was sourcing, with 31 percent of responses, among others, citing incorrect or unverifiable attribution or sources that were not supported by the cited source.

20% of responses were impacted by a lack of accuracy, followed by a lack of appropriate context, which was a 14% higher percentage.

According to the study, 76 percent of responses were impacted by Gemini, which had a major impact on sourcing.

Basic factual errors were made by all AI models studied, according to the study.

The errors include ChatGPT’s designation of Pope Francis as the sitting pontiff months after his death and Perplexity’s claim that surrogacy is prohibited in Czechia.

OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Perplexity did not respond to inquiries for comment right away.

In a foreword to the report, Pete Archer, the BBC’s head of AI, and Jean Philip De Tender, the EBU’s deputy general, called on tech companies to do more to reduce errors in their products.

De Tender and Archer remarked that they must prioritize this problem right away.

China accuses Australia of covering up South China Sea airspace incursion

In response to Canberra’s earlier allegations that the two countries’ military aircraft were flying over the South China Sea, China has accused Australia of covering up an incursion into Chinese airspace.

Jiang Bin, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defense, stated to reporters on Tuesday that China had “solemn” complained to Australia about what he claimed was Australia’s “attempts to cover up the egregious illegal intrusion of its military aircraft into Chinese airspace.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Jiang argued that an Australian Defense Force statement on Monday “shifts the blame to China” and demanded that Australia “restrain the actions of its frontline naval and air forces, and prevent deteriorating China-Australian relations.”

A day after the Australian government’s ministry of defense issued a statement about an “unsafe and unprofessional” incident on Sunday, in which it claimed a Chinese Air Force fighter aircraft “released flares in close proximity” to an Australian Air Force plane conducting a “maritime surveillance patrol in the South China Sea,” the response from China’s defense ministry came a day later.

The Australian Defence Force has been conducting maritime surveillance in the area for decades, according to the Australian statement.

Jiang claimed the incident occurred in airspace over “China’s Xisha Islands,” Beijing’s name for the Paracel Islands, but Australia’s statement did not specify where the alleged incident occurred in the South China Sea.

Vietnam and Taiwan also claim the group of islands known as Paracel.

China and Australia exchanged similar accusations in February of this year regarding another incident.

China claims almost all of the South China Sea, despite a 2016 international tribunal ruling that found its claim to be unsupported by law.

The busy waterway marks one of China’s and America’s diplomatic climes, which include a trade war, US sanctions, and Hong Kong and Taiwan issues. China and several of its neighbors, who claim some of its territory, are also at odds with one another over the South China Sea.

In response to China’s recent restrictions on its own exports, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday to sign an agreement allowing Australia to supply rare earth and crucial minerals to the US.

The two leaders also discussed Australia’s agreement with the United Kingdom and the US to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines in accordance with the AUKUS security pact.

After Washington had earlier stated earlier this week that it was reviewing the agreement for at least three Virginia-class nuclear attack submarines signed by former US President Joe Biden, “the submarines that we’re starting to build for Australia are really moving along,” Trump told reporters on Monday.

Following Albanese and Trump’s meeting in Beijing, the Chinese government’s position on the agreement was reiterated.

We “always oppose” creating a “blockbuster,” raising the threat of nuclear proliferation, and bringing on a “arms race,” according to Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs.

Israel, Hamas return more bodies of captives under Gaza ceasefire deal

The Palestinian group claims that Israel is breaking with the Gaza ceasefire agreement by refusing to reopen the crucial Rafah border crossing with Egypt after Israel and Hamas exchanged the remains of even more captives.

Aryeh Zalmanovich, 85, and army Master Sergeant Tamir Adar, 38, both identified as having been taken into custody of two more Israelis, one soldier and one civilian, late on Tuesday and later identified as having been held captive in Israel.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Prior to the handover organized by the Hamas-based Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of Hamas, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) had received the bodies in Gaza.

Zalmanovich passed away in Gaza on November 17, 2023, and Adar passed away in a fight in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing him and returning his body to the Palestinian territory.

In accordance with Israel’s ceasefire agreement, Hamas has now handed over the bodies of 15 Israeli prisoners.

Although Hamas claims that the bodies’ recovery has been hampered by the ongoing devastation in the Palestinian territory and the Israeli military’s continued control of some of Gaza, an additional 13 sets of remains are expected to be returned to Israel.

At the start of the ceasefire, the Palestinians also released 20 of the country’s 20 most seriously incarcerated people in a single day.

According to a medical source, 15 Palestinians who were detained by Israeli forces were later brought back to Gaza where they were taken to the Nasser Medical Complex for identification.

In accordance with the ceasefire agreement, Israel has committed to release the remains of 360 more Palestinian prisoners who are still alive and are still imprisoned in Israel.

Some 45 Palestinians’ bodies arrived last week, according to a forensics team that received them, still shackled and showing signs of physical abuse and possible execution.

The Bisan Center for Research and Development’s executive director, Ubai Al-Aboudi, claimed that Palestinians who are held hostage by Israel should also be regarded as such.

Al-Aboudi, a Palestinian-based Al-Aboudi correspondent in Ramallah, claimed that “when we talk about Palestinian prisoners, we are actually talking about hostages.”

Al-Aboudi noted that since the Israeli occupation of Gaza began in October 2023, about 20% of the Palestinian population has been detained or arrested by Israel over the years.

He claimed that the majority of them are detained on military orders issued by a foreign military occupation and without any due process or prosecution.

Rafah crossing is still closed.

Despite Israel’s “repeated violations,” a Hamas delegation said in a statement to Turkish officials in Qatar on Tuesday that the Palestinian organization is still committed to the ceasefire agreement.

The Hamas officials claimed in a statement that Israel is putting off the implementation of the ceasefire by closing the Rafah crossing to facilitate the movement of sick and injured people and impedes the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

The Hamas delegation’s leader, Mujahid Muhammad Darwish, also emphasized “the inalienable rights of our people to self-determination and their right to an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital.”

In Cairo’s Sharm el-Sheikh earlier this month, Turkiye was one of the signatories to US President Donald Trump’s document on the ceasefire agreement with Gaza.

Since May 7, 2024, the Rafah crossing has been closed because of Israeli forces’ invasion of the southern Gaza Strip’s city, where close to one million people were sheltered at the time.

The crossing, which connects Egypt and the Palestinian territory, is one of two “arteries” for humanitarian access, according to the UN.

Following an urgent submission from South Africa, the UN’s highest court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), ordered Israel to reopen the Rafah crossing on May 24, 2024. However, the crossing has remained closed and has only been accessible through the adjacent Karem Abu Salem crossing.

After a temporary ceasefire that also allowed for medical evacuations on January 19, 2025, before Israel issued new forced evacuation orders for Rafah at the end of March, residents of the destroyed city could only return home.

North Korea fires ‘unidentified’ ballistic missiles towards East Sea: Seoul

Developing a Story

South Korea’s military reported that this was its first missile launch in a while as North Korea fired at least one ballistic missile at waters off its eastern coast.

The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, which will feature world leaders including Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump, will take place in Gyeongju, South Korea, on Wednesday morning.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

According to the official South Korean Yonhap news agency, “at least one unidentified ballistic missile” was fired towards the East Sea, which is also known as the Sea of Japan.

The most recent launch is the first under Lee Jae-myung’s new presidency, which took office in June, according to Yonhap reports that North Korea last fired short-range ballistic and cruise missiles towards the East Sea on May 8 and May 22.

According to the Associated Press news agency, experts warned that North Korea might launch provocative missile tests in response to its commitment to being recognized as a nuclear-armed state before or during the APEC summit.

During a massive military parade in Pyongyang, where top Chinese, Russian, and other leaders were present, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un debuted a new long-range Hwasong-20 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), which he called the “most powerful,” earlier this month.

Kim’s strengthening diplomatic ties on a regional and global scale and his persistent efforts to develop sophisticated weapons capable of carrying nuclear payloads were highlighted at the parade, which marked the 80th anniversary of the founding of North Korea’s ruling Workers’ Party.

Pyongyang has long opposed international restrictions on the development of weapons, calling them necessary to shield North Korea from US and South Korean potential attacks.

Trump recently stated that he hopes to meet Kim again, possibly this year, after having previously met the North Korean leader during his first term in office.