Satellite images show how Israel is obliterating large areas of Gaza City as its offensive intensifies, forcibly displacing one million Palestinians in its campaign of destruction.
Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk has pledged to push ahead with a “great modernisation programme” for his country’s military, a day after Polish and NATO forces shot down drones violating the country’s airspace during a Russian aerial attack on neighbouring Ukraine.
The Polish Air Navigation Services Agency announced on Thursday that Poland had introduced air traffic restrictions along its eastern borders with Belarus and Ukraine. It said the step was taken at the request of the Polish army for national security reasons, but did not elaborate.
list of 3 itemsend of list
The restrictions will apply until December 9, Polish air traffic authorities said. Under the rules, civilian unmanned aircraft, such as drones, are banned; general aviation – mainly small and recreational aircraft and helicopters – can operate during the day provided they have a radio and transponder, but cannot fly at night.
Tusk said on Wednesday that the drone incursion incident was “the closest we have been to open conflict since World War II,” though he also said he had “no reason to believe we’re on the brink of war”.
European officials described Wednesday’s incursion, which occurred during a wave of recent relentless Russian strikes on Ukraine, as a deliberate provocation, forcing the NATO alliance to confront a potential threat in its airspace for the first time. Neither Poland nor NATO has yet given a full account of what they suspect the drones were doing.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pushed Kyiv’s allies on Thursday for a tougher response to the incursion into Poland, saying the move was likely aimed at slowing supplies of air defences to Ukraine ahead of this winter.
Zelenskyy, speaking at a briefing in Kyiv alongside Finnish President Alexander Stubb, also urged allies to rethink their own air defence capabilities, adding that missile-based systems are too expensive to use against cheaper drones.
For his part, Stubb accused Hungary and Slovakia of funding the Kremlin’s “war machine” by buying Russian oil and gas, in one of his sharpest rebukes yet of his fellow European Union members.
Stubb also said the crossing of Russian drones into Poland showed Moscow was “seeking escalation” with NATO and that Europe needed to put further pressure on Russia.
“As far as getting our own house in order, I think [US] President [Donald] Trump, when he says that Europe needs to stop buying Russian oil and gas, is right,” Stubb told reporters.
“The finger points in two places. One is Hungary and the other one is Slovakia. And, of course, we make sure that President Trump is aware of who is feeding the Russian war machine by buying Russian energy,” he added.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Slovakia’s Robert Fico have both criticised European aid for Ukraine and sought closer ties with Russia, to the frustration of Brussels.
Poland said some of the drones that entered its airspace on Wednesday came from Belarus, where Russian and local troops have begun gathering for war games scheduled to start on Friday. Poland is closing its border with Belarus at midnight on Thursday, a planned move also associated with the military exercises.
Underscoring the global repercussions of the war, China on Thursday urged Poland to keep open a section of the Belarus border for a China-EU freight track that crosses it. The rail line is part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative to boost trade with other countries.
Tusk addressed Polish troops at an airbase in the central city of Lask, praising their quick action and that of NATO allied forces from the Netherlands that responded to the Russian drone incursions.
Dutch Foreign Minister David van Weel announced on Thursday that his government had summoned Russia’s ambassador to the Netherlands over the incident.
Polish President Karol Nawrocki, meanwhile, visited the Poznan-Krzesiny base in western Poland on Thursday and struck a defiant tone. Poland “doesn’t get scared by Russian drones”, he said in a statement.
Nawrocki described the incursion as “an attempt to test our abilities, the ability to react”.
He was also due to convene Poland’s national security council, which advises him on security threats.
The Kremlin said it had nothing to add to a statement on Wednesday by Russia’s Defence Ministry, which insisted that Russian forces had not targeted Poland and that it was open to discussing the incident with Polish officials.
It also dismissed talk of the incursion being a provocation. “The statements we hear from Warsaw: well, they’re nothing new. This rhetoric is typical of almost all European capitals,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said.
The United Nations Security Council has scheduled an emergency meeting on the drone incursion on Friday afternoon at Poland’s request.
Polish airspace has been violated many times since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but never on this scale in Poland or anywhere else in NATO territory. Wednesday’s incident was the first time a NATO member is known to have fired shots during Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Russian drone attacks on civilian areas are daily occurrences in Ukraine. The Ukrainian military has successfully developed drones to combat the attacks, called interceptors.
The Ukrainian air force said on Thursday its forces intercepted 62 out of 66 Russian strike and decoy drones in the country’s airspace overnight.
Brazil’s Supreme Court could decide on Thursday whether former President Jair Bolsonaro is guilty of masterminding a coup to stay in power following the country’s tense 2022 presidential elections.
Hailed by some Brazilians as “historic”, the landmark case has set the whole country on edge, with tens of thousands rallying in support of the populist former leader, and has also escalated tensions between Latin America’s largest nation and Washington.
list of 4 itemsend of list
Bolsonaro faces a five-count charge related to attempts to stage a coup, which he denies. The 70-year-old claims the trial is a politically motivated attempt by the government of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to prevent him from seeking another term in the 2026 elections. US President Donald Trump, who counts Bolsonaro as an ally, has echoed that argument and has tried to punish Brazil with higher trade tariffs.
At least three of the five justices of the Supreme Court panel ruling on the case have already voted this week. The final two are expected to cast their votes on Thursday. Sentencing is likely as early as Friday.
Here’s what we know about the trial:
Bolsonaro, alongside seven of his close allies, faces several charges of attempting to overturn the October 2022 presidential elections after he lost to Lula, who also served as president between 2003 and 2011.
Specifically, Bolsonaro faces five charges, including: attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organisation, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, and two more counts involving destruction of state property during violent protests by his supporters on January 8, 2023.
Bolsonaro’s lawyer, Celso Vilardi, said he is not guilty of the charges, arguing that, although Bolsonaro assembled top cabinet and military officials to discuss an emergency decree aimed at suspending the elections, the decree was ultimately not issued, and Bolsonaro eventually ordered a transition of power to Lula.
The former leader could face up to 40 years in jail if convicted. The coup plot charge alone carries a 12-year sentence.
Others accused alongside Bolsonaro include former Defence Minister and Bolsonaro’s 2022 running mate Walter Braga Netto, former Defence Minister Paulo Sergio Nogueira, Bolsonaro’s former aide-de-camp Mauro Cid, military adviser Augusto Heleno Ribeiro, former Justice Minister Anderson Torres, former naval chief Almir Garnier Santos, and ex-police officer Alexandre Ramagem.
Since August, Bolsonaro has remained under house arrest at a heavily guarded building in the capital, Brasilia. He is banned from social media and has only limited access to communications. In 2023, the country’s electoral commission also barred him from running for office until 2030, citing abuse of power.
Supporters of the president have held protests in recent days against what they say is a witch-hunt by the Lula government. There are fears that violent protests could break out if a guilty verdict is reached.
Others, though, have hailed the trial, calling it “historic”, as the first time the country has attempted to hold a leader accused of attempting a coup accountable.
The Supreme Court hearing began deliberations on a verdict on September 9, and is set to conclude on September 12.
To reach a guilty verdict, three of the five judges must support a conviction.
Three of the five Supreme Court justices had already voted by Thursday. Two more are expected to cast their votes on Thursday, barring adjournments.
Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the ruling and is considered by Bolsonaro’s supporters to be a major adversary driving the trial, was the first to vote in favour of a conviction on Thursday.
Moraes, in a five-hour-long statement, said that under Bolsonaro’s rule, “Brazil almost returned to a dictatorship,” referring to the military rule that lasted for 21 years from 1964 to 1985.
The judge said there was evidence of a Bolsonaro-led plot, codenamed Operation Green and Yellow Dagger, to assassinate Lula, his vice president, Geraldo Alckmin, as well as Justice Moraes. Those efforts, he said, culminated in Bolsonaro supporters attacking Congress, the Presidential Palace, and the Supreme Court in violent protests on January 8, 2023.
A second justice, Justice Flavio Dino, has also voted to convict Bolsonaro.
Then, on Wednesday, Justice Luiz Fux broke from his colleagues in a surprise move and instead called for the case to be annulled because, he said, it had failed to follow due process.
Fux argued that the Supreme Court had an “absolute lack of jurisdiction” over the case. He said that, because Bolsonaro and his fellow accused are no longer political appointees, the case should have been heard by a lower court.
He also argued that, once the Supreme Court had become involved, the case should have been handled by the full panel of 11 justices, rather than a five-member panel. The defence team, he added, had not been given enough time to prepare its case, while prosecutors were armed with what he called a “tsunami of data” amounting to “billions of pages”.
Fux, however, did rule against two allies of the former president – Mauro Cid and Netto – on the charge of violent abolition of the democratic rule of law.
The two remaining judges must now cast their votes – only one more conviction vote is needed to seal Bolsonaro’s fate.
The two judges – Justice Carmen Lucia and Justice Cristiano Zanin – were both appointed by Lula: Judge Lucia during Lula’s first term as president in 2006, and Judge Zanin in 2023. Many experts anticipate that they will vote to convict Bolsonaro. However, Judge Lucia has in the past voted against Lula, when he was on trial between 2017 and 2021 on money laundering charges. Lula was eventually acquitted.
The Bolsonaro trial has deepened bitter divides between the former leader’s millions of supporters and those who believe his prosecution is justified.
This past week, as the Supreme Court trial was continuing, Bolsonaro’s supporters mobilised across the country in protests. They demanded that the former leader and his fellow accused be granted an amnesty, and accused the government of failing to allow a fair trial. Bolsonaro’s supporters are also demanding he be allowed to run for presidency again in 2026, something the former leader has also called for.
On Sunday, Bolsonaro’s wife, Michelle Bolsonaro, addressed chanting, flag-toting crowds of supporters in Sao Paulo. In tears, she told the throng that the trial had brought “humiliation” to her family. The date coincided with Brazil’s September 7 Independence Day, when the country gained freedom from Portugal in 1822.
Similarly, thousands have gathered in counterprotests in recent days, calling for Bolsonaro’s conviction and denouncing Washington’s support – under Trump – for the former leader.
In the capital, Brasilia, meanwhile, Lula’s Independence Day message was that Brazil is “nobody’s colony” and would not accept orders from anyone.
On Tuesday, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt suggested the US could react strongly – economically or even militarily – if there is a guilty verdict. She told a news conference: “This is a priority for the administration and the president is unafraid to use the economic might, the military might, of the United States to protect free speech around the world.” She did not provide any details, however.
In a response, Gleisi Hoffman, a Brazilian lawmaker and chief minister of the country’s Secretariat for Institutional Relations, condemned Leavitt’s statement, saying that the US was threatening to “invade Brazil to free Jair Bolsonaro from prison”.
“This is utterly unacceptable,” Hoffman said in a statement on X. “And yet [the US] claims to be defending ‘freedom of expression’. Only if it’s the freedom to lie, to coerce the Justice system, and to plot a coup d’etat; those are indeed the crimes for which Bolsonaro and his accomplices are being tried in due legal process.”
Trump has repeatedly defended Bolsonaro – and has attempted to penalise Brazil for the trial of his ally.
In social media posts in July, the US president drew parallels between the Bolsonaro trial and his own prosecution for alleged involvement in an attack by protesters on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, after he lost the 2020 US presidential election to Joe Biden.
Trump also wrote a letter to President Lula, accusing him of mistreating Bolsonaro. The trial against Bolsonaro, he said, was an “international disgrace”.
In July, the US Department of State sanctioned Justice de Moraes, who is leading the Supreme Court panel for the trial. It accused him of suppressing freedom of expression and politicising prosecutions, including that of Bolsonaro.
De Moraes has been barred from obtaining a US visa, and any US properties he may own were ordered to be confiscated. The judge’s “allies” in the Supreme Court, as well as “certain family members”, have also been barred from US visas, although the State Department did not mention names.
On August 1, Trump slapped Brazil with a 50 percent trade tariff, citing the charges against Bolsonaro as part of the reason.
Trump stated that the high tariffs were “due in part to Brazil’s insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans”, saying that the verdict impacted not only Brazilians, but Americans, too.
Trump’s global trade war has primarily targeted countries that run a large trading surplus with the US. Brazilian imports from the US, however, already outweigh its exports; Washington had a trading surplus of $28.6bn in goods and services with Brazil in 2024.
Brazil’s Lula called the tariff escalation “authoritarian” but has not imposed reciprocal levies.
Leavitt’s suggestion that the US would not rule out military options against Brazil comes against the backdrop of the recent deployment of US naval forces to the Caribbean.
The US says its military forces are in the region to counter drug trafficking. However, the deployment comes as US threats against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, whom US President Donald Trump’s administration has accused of being closely linked with drug trafficking groups, have ramped up.
Conservative American activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed on Wednesday at a university event in Utah.
Kirk, 31, was a close ally of United States President Donald Trump and was widely credited for helping galvanise support for the Republican Party and Trump’s MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement among American youth, including through regular engagements with university students.
list of 4 itemsend of list
He was the cofounder of the conservative youth organisation Turning Point USA. Here is a closer look at Kirk’s influence on young people and how it bolstered support for Trump and the MAGA movement:
The conservative media personality grew up in Chicago and attended a community college there before dropping out to pursue political activism.
He became friends with Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr, and the pair travelled together to Greenland in January. President Trump had made clear by then that he wanted to absorb the Danish territory into the US even though Denmark and Greenland had both pushed back.
Kirk was an early supporter of Vice President JD Vance while Trump was deciding on his running mate for the 2024 election.
A vocal critic of mainstream media, Kirk engaged in culture-war debates surrounding race, gender and immigration. He amplified and backed Trump’s unfounded claim that the 2020 election was stolen after Joe Biden won the vote.
Kirk has also been accused of holding racist, Islamophobic and misogynistic positions.
Kirk wrote a post on his X account on Tuesday in response to the fatal, unprovoked stabbing of a white woman by a Black man. He said: “The numbers tell the truth. Black attacks on white people happen 3X more often than white on black crime, despite blacks being only 13 percent of the population.”
On September 1, he wrote on his X account that “America does not need more visas for people from India. Perhaps no form of legal immigration has so displaced American workers as those from India.”
After the current war in Gaza broke out on October 7, 2023, after a Hamas-led attack on Israel, Kirk spoke at an event expressing solidarity with Israel. “The Muslims’ playbook is: surprise attack, use children and women as human shields, build international support that can then build consensus against Israel, and people will forget that Israel was attacked in the first place.”
In August, musician Taylor Swift got engaged to American football player Travis Kelce. During one of his events, Kirk said getting married might make Swift more conservative, urging her to have children. Kirk said: “Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”
Kirk was a firm supporter of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution, which grants Americans the right to bear arms. In an interview this year, he said that “it’s worth it” to have “some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment”.
His death prompted condolence messages from Trump, his MAGA base, former US presidents, politicians from both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, other public figures and world leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Kirk’s shooter is still at large, and a manhunt for his killer continues.
Kirk cofounded the nonprofit conservative advocacy group Turning Point USA in 2012 when he was 18 years old. He started it with Bill Montgomery, an American conservative activist who died aged 80 in 2020.
Turning Point has more than 850 chapters on US college campuses, where the organisation conducts discussions and conferences over issues such as immigration, abortion rights – Kirk was against them – and race.
The group also hosts several podcasts, including The Charlie Kirk Show, which reached more than 500,000 listeners each month.
When Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University, he was on the first visit of his multicampus Turning Point tour.
In 2019, a British offshoot of the group called Turning Point UK was formed. There is also an Australian offshoot, called Turning Point Australia.
While the extent of his influence is hard to measure definitively, the MAGA movement, Trump and independent experts all believe he played a crucial role in building support for the president and his political campaign.
“Charlie Kirk had a significant political and mobilising influence among the Trumpist youth,” Ico Maly, an associate professor at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, told Al Jazeera. Maly teaches courses about digital media and has written about far-right activism.
Maly explained that Kirk’s impact was the result of how he used digital culture in his ideological struggle.
“It was his embrace of digital culture that laid the foundation for his mobilisation power in support of the Trump agenda. His campus rallies were not merely offline performances. They reproduced a familiar digital format: ‘Ask me anything,’” Maly said.
Turning Point USA invested millions of dollars in a “chase the vote” initiative, building relationships with Republican voters in battleground states, registering these voters and assisting them with voting.
Before the 2024 US presidential election, Kirk visited 25 college campuses on a tour called You’re Being Brainwashed to mobilise young voters. This tour was “hailed by some as the single most important reason for a surge in Trump’s support among the youngest voters”, Australia-based writer Daryl McCann told Al Jazeera. McCann writes about conservative US politics for the Quadrant, Spectator Australia and Salisbury Review publications.
While it is impossible to know how much Kirk’s efforts contributed, Trump benefitted from a clear bump in support among young voters in 2024.
He won 49 percent of the votes of men aged 18 to 49 nationally, up from 43 percent in 2020 and 46 percent in 2016, according to the Pew Research Center.
In 2024, Trump’s Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris, won 48 percent of the votes of young men. In 2020, Biden won 53 percent of the vote share for this group, and in 2016, Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton won 43 percent of this vote share.
In 2024, Trump won a 42 percent vote share of women aged 18 to 49. While Harris won 56 percent of the votes of this group, his vote share among young women was up from 38 percent in 2020 and 27 percent in 2016.
In the 2024 election, Trump won all seven key battleground states, including Arizona, where he defeated Harris by 187,000 votes. Last year, CNN reported an unnamed source with knowledge of the matter as saying Turning Point USA’s efforts helped bring 125,000 irregular voters in Arizona to the polls. According to CNN, Turning Point drove voters to polling places and helped them with mail-in ballots.
In May, Trump lauded Kirk’s contributions, saying they helped him win the vote of young people in 2024.
“And Charlie Kirk will tell you, TikTok helped, but Charlie Kirk helped also,” Trump said during an Oval Office ceremony.
The very positions that turned him into a hate figure for some people helped him draw supporters to the MAGA movement too, experts said.
“His mobilisation power was fundamentally rooted in controversy. It is precisely this controversy that made him highly visible online, allowing him to exert significant ideological influence,” Maly said.
McCann added: “Kirk succeeded because he was charismatic, funny and tore apart wokeist ideology. Turning Point USA’s insurgent outreach to Gen Z perfectly complemented Trump’s populist pitch to the entire nation, which asserted that a coterie of insiders – the ‘enemy within’ – were betraying ordinary Americans.”
A host on Israel’s right-wing Channel 14 distributed sweets and champagne to celebrate the Israeli attack on Hamas leaders meeting in Doha, Qatar.
Qatar’s prime minister called Israel’s strike on Doha “state terror” in an interview with CNN, demanding Netanyahu face justice. The attack has sent shock waves across the region, with states that recently explored normalisation with Israel now rallying around Qatar.