Australia’s election will show if PM Anthony Albanese has won back voters

Australians are heading to the polls shortly in parliamentary elections which will decide if Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s centre-left Labor government will return for a second term.

Labor’s main rival is the country’s conservative coalition, led by opposition leader Peter Dutton, which came into the election campaign polling strongly but is now lagging slightly behind Labor.

If Albanese does win, it could mean Australia is following in similar footsteps to Canada, where the Liberal party reversed its prospects in recent weeks, amid concerns about the effect of United States President Donald Trump’s policies on Canada’s economy.

Amy Remeikis, chief political analyst at the Australia Institute, an independent research centre, told Al Jazeera that polls indicate President Trump is “an increasing concern for Australian voters” and that “Labor’s gamble of holding a later election to allow some of Trump’s policies to start to impact has paid off.”

In comparison with Canada, where both major parties tried to distance themselves from Trump, Remeikis notes that Australia’s opposition leader Dutton has courted “favourable comparisons” to Trump for months.

But, he has been “badly damaged by the ‘Temu Trump’ label” – a reference to the Chinese online shopping website known for selling cheap copies of original brands.

The Archbishop of Sydney Anthony Fisher and Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton after attending mass, following the death of Pope Francis, at Saint Mary’s Cathedral in Sydney, Australia, on April 22, 2025 [Hollie Adams/Reuters]

War on Gaza and the price of eggs

Uncertainty around Trump’s tariffs on Australia has only compounded the concerns of many Australians around the cost of essential items, including housing, food, healthcare and childcare.

In the final televised leaders’ debate, a week before the election, both Dutton and Albanese stumbled when asked to guess how much a dozen eggs might cost at a supermarket.

Albanese was closer, guessing 7 Australian dollars, nearly two dollars less than the actual price of $8.80, while Dutton guessed $4.20, less than half the actual price.

FILE PHOTO: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reacts during an appearance as a guest on the Sunday Footy Show during the federal election campaign in Sydney, Australia, April 20 2025. AAP Image/Alex Ellinghausen/Pool via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES AUSTRALIA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN NEW ZEALAND/File Photo
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during an appearance as a guest on the Sunday Footy Show during the federal election campaign in Sydney, Australia, on April 20, 2025 [Alex Ellinghausen/Pool via Reuters]

Cost of living has “trumped everything” leading into the election, says Josie Hess, who comes from the Latrobe Valley, a coal-mining region in Victoria, and who also works for advocacy group Environment Victoria.

For a number of Australians, the most important issue on election day will be beyond Australia’s borders, says Nasser Mashni, the president of the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN).

Mashni told Al Jazeera that “the genocide that is occurring in Palestine” has seen a “new constituency” emerge in Australia that understands that Israel is “a settler colonialist movement doing exactly what occurred here [in Australia] 238 years ago”.

APAN has developed a scorecard of where the major parties stand on Palestine. Of those, only the Greens received a tick from APAN on every issue. The scorecard for Labor was mixed, while the conservative Liberal-National coalition did not meet a single criterion.

“We’ve asked for people to make Palestine their number one issue and to find a candidate that best reflects a just and humane position for Palestine,” Mashni said.

“Certainly, the easiest candidates to find will be in the Senate, but I am sure there’ll be somebody in every seat where they can vote a little bit better for Palestine, and in some cases, very well for Palestine,” he added.

Dozens of minor parties and independents from across the political spectrum are also vying for votes.

Remeikis said there is a “late surge to the nationalistic, far-right, One Nation party”, which has been aided by Dutton’s conservative coalition preferencing votes for One Nation, and vice versa, in outer suburban and inner regional seats. Next year marks 30 years since One Nation’s leader Pauline Hanson was first elected to federal office in Australia.

But Remeikis says the late surge is unlikely to affect the outcome of the election, with polls suggesting Labor will win with a minority government.

The Greens, along with some independents running on pro-climate action platforms, will also be hoping to repeat successes in Australia’s 2022 election, which followed many months of devastating fires and floods.

People arrive at a polling place as early voting begins in Sydney, Tuesday, April 22, 2025, for a national election to be held on May 3. (AP Photo/Mark Baker)
People arrive at a polling centre as early voting begins in Sydney on April 22, 2025 [Mark Baker/AP]

Going nuclear

With climate change remaining a key concern for many Australians, Dutton, whose party has long delayed taking action on climate, has chosen to focus on campaigning to build Australia’s first-ever nuclear power stations in areas where coal power stations are closing down, such as the Latrobe Valley, in Victoria.

This week, organisations representing more than 350,000 emergency and health services workers released a letter calling on Dutton to drop his plan to introduce nuclear energy to Australia, saying “Australia’s current emergency services do not have the support or resources to respond to nuclear disasters.”

Josie Hess, a Latrobe Valley local who works for Environment Victoria, told Al Jazeera that people there still have questions about the viability of Dutton’s proposal.

She says people in the valley “desperately need jobs” but the timeline to build nuclear means that it would do little to help workers now.

“We have some people who support nuclear but for the most part, the Latrobe Valley is not a monolith, and there is clear and demonstrable opposition to the proposal,” she said.

And while economic issues are a concern, she added, there is also an “intrinsic link between climate security and cost of living and housing”.

Melissa Sweet, who runs public health news site Croakey, told Al Jazeera that climate change remains a key issue for Australian health workers heading into the election.

“Heatwaves, floods, and bushfires are already driving up demand for emergency care, mental health services, and chronic disease management,” Sweet said.

Donald Trump renews threats against Harvard University’s tax exempt status

United States President Donald Trump has renewed his threat to strip Harvard University of its tax exempt status, a move that could cost the Ivy League institution billions of dollars if implemented.

“We are going to be taking away Harvard’s Tax Exempt Status. It’s what they deserve!” Trump wrote on Friday, in a post on his social media platform Truth Social.

The statement is the latest threat in a continuing feud between the Republican president and Harvard, the country’s oldest higher-education institution.

Since taking office for a second term on January 20, Trump has sought to increase his control over US universities and crack down on what he considers “illegal protests” on campus.

But Harvard has been a focal point for his public ire, particularly after school leaders refused a list of demands the Trump administration sent on April 11.

In a five-page letter (PDF), Trump officials called on Harvard to reform its student disciplinary system, investigate protesters involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, commission an external audit of programmes deemed anti-Semitic and eliminate its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes.

The letter also required Harvard to commit to “viewpoint diversity” in its hiring and admissions practices, something it was expected to accomplish through “structural and personnel changes”. Critics said this mandate was tantamount to Trump attempting to impose a political litmus test on the school.

By April 14, Harvard’s President Alan Garber had rejected the letter. In a statement published to Harvard’s website, he explained that Trump’s demands infringed upon Harvard’s academic freedom, among other rights.

“The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” Garber wrote. “No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

The Trump administration swiftly responded by suspending nearly $2.2bn in grants and contracts to the school.

It has since filed a lawsuit (PDF) challenging Trump’s attempts to withhold federal funding from the school, calling the move “leverage to gain control of academic decision-making at Harvard”.

Shortly after halting the grants and contracts, Trump turned his attention to Harvard’s tax exempt status, ratcheting up the pressure on the school.

Educational institutions, charities, nonprofits and institutions of scientific research are among the entities eligible to apply for tax exempt status under US law. That status offers those organisations relief from paying federal income and property taxes.

But on April 15, Trump mused on social media that Harvard should lose that exemption, on account of its handling of pro-Palestinian student protests.

“Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax-Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’” Trump wrote.

US media reports later indicated that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was having internal deliberations about whether to revoke the school’s IRS status, despite such action being relatively rare.

But under the US Code, it is illegal for the president, vice president or any of their employees to petition the IRS — even indirectly — to conduct an audit of any taxpayer.

Democrats have seized on that fact to push for an investigation into the Trump administration’s actions towards Harvard.

“The President is targeting the non-profit status of Harvard University for blatantly political purposes,” Democratic senators including Chuck Schumer, Ron Wyden and Elizabeth Warren wrote in a joint letter on Friday.

Prince Harry says he wants to reconcile but King Charles won’t speak to him

Due to the controversy surrounding Prince Harry leaving the British royal family in 2020, he has stated that he wants to reconcile with his family, but his father, King Charles III, will not speak to him.

Harry, who immigrated to the United States with his wife, Meghan, said he did not believe he would be able to bring his family back to the United Kingdom in an interview with the BBC on Friday.

Harry lost a legal battle to get his full police protection when he visited the UK, so the interview came out shortly after.

The prince declared, “I would love family reconciliation.” Life is precious, he says. My father has a long history, but I’m not sure how long. Due to this security-related information, he won’t be able to reach me, but reconciliation would be nice.

Although aides have been positive about Charles’ treatment is progressing, Buckingham Palace revealed last year that he had been diagnosed with an unspecified form of cancer.

In response to Harry’s interview, Buckingham Palace responded by saying that “all of these issues have been carefully and thoroughly examined by the courts, with the same conclusion being drawn every time.”

Harry’s earlier unsuccessful attempt to overturn a 2020 decision by the Home Office, the ministry responsible for policing, which stated that he would not be automatically eligible for personal police protection in the UK was rejected by London’s Court of Appeal.

The government’s decision was not unreasonable, unanimously decided by three judges on the appellate court.

On May 6, 2023, Prince Harry arrives at Westminster Abbey to celebrate King Charles’ coronation. [Photo: Andy Stenning/Pool via Reuters]

Harry’s lawyer had made compelling and moving arguments for his case in a 21-page judgment, according to Justice Geoffrey Vos. However, he claimed that the prince’s complaint against the government’s decision to deny him regular security was not legitimate.

Something may have gone wrong in the Duke of Sussex’s opinion, as he may have discovered that his decision to step down from his royal duties and spend the majority of his time abroad had a more bespoke, and generally lower, level of protection than he did when he was in the UK, Vos said.

“But that does not, by itself, constitute a legal complaint.”

Harry claimed that the Royal Household had influenced the decision in an interview with the BBC that Friday’s ruling was a “good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up.”

He claimed that his father and the government had been “used as leverage” to control him and demanded assistance from the government. The prince, who is also known as the duke of Sussex, said, “My father has a lot of control and ability in his hands.”

In the end, he could help solve the problem, not necessarily by intervening, but by leaning aside and allowing the experts to do what is necessary.

Harry, 40, the younger son of Princess Diana and Charles Charles, has opposed the royal family’s convention by challenging the press and the government.

US labour market holds steady despite tariffs, adding 177,000 jobs in April

Despite uncertainty in Donald Trump’s first two terms as president, the US economy added 177, 000 jobs in April, topping analysts’ expectations.

Despite Trump’s tariff campaign’s influence, the data, which was released on Friday by the Labor Department, suggests that the job market is stable.

The healthcare sector added 51, 000 jobs, which is the highest overall increase ever recorded in the previous 12 months. In April, 29, 000 jobs were created in the transportation and warehousing industries, respectively.

However, experts believe that particular growth in those sectors could indicate that those industries are stockpiling before Trump’s high tariffs start causing the price of imports to rise.

Before the tariff hike, “people wanted to front-load and bring in more material,” according to Stuart Mackintosh, the executive director of the Group of Thirty, a financial think tank.

Although the labor report from Friday shows positive signs, Mackintosh added that other economic indicators indicate general market uncertainty, which could eventually detract from upcoming employment statistics.

“Small and medium businesses have warned about their future earnings projections.” That’s what businesses are telling us, “We don’t know,” We don’t know for sure. And we anticipate that [earnings] will decline, Mackintosh said.

“I anticipate that will soon become a problem for employment.”

slowing down growth

Despite a number of changes since Trump took office in January, Friday’s labor report revealed that employment in the US has not changed.

Trump has pursued a stern trade policy for the past four months, largely under the threat of tariffs, to reduce trade deficits. The US currently imposes 10% tariffs on imports, with the possibility of putting higher tariffs on individual nations in the upcoming three months.

However, as a result of an ongoing trade conflict with the US, China is currently subject to tariffs of 145 percent. Meanwhile, Trump’s first term and the two countries that negotiated a regional free trade agreement have been subject to tariffs of 25% on all products.

Experts have warned that Trump’s erratic trade practices could have long-term detrimental effects, including stumbling economic growth and the possibility of a recession.

However, the report from Friday shows that there haven’t been any significant harms to the US labor market. In April, the unemployment rate remained at 4.2 percent.

4. 7 million people, or 7% of the workforce, are underemployed for economic reasons. 62.6 percent of people in the workforce participated in.

Additionally, wages increased by six cents to $ 36.06 since last month. Annually, the average hourly earnings have increased by 3.8%.

However, there are 179, 000 more Americans who have been unemployed for 1.7 million people overall over the long term, which are considered to be 27 weeks or longer.

However, other reports don’t show the same steady job growth. Only 62, 000 new jobs were added in April, according to ADP Research, a company that monitors private sector payrolls. This is the smallest monthly increase since July 2024.

Chief economist at ADP, Nela Richardson, stated that “unease” was the dominant emotion in a news release accompanying the findings.

Employers are attempting to reconcile policy uncertainty with a collection of largely positive economic data, she explained.

In addition, a separate report from Challenger, Grey &amp, Christmas, an employment services firm, revealed that despite increasing hiring, the US economy lost more than 105, 000 jobs in April.

Government reductions

Government employment was one area of the report that on Friday did indicate significant losses.

In April alone, the Labor Department reported a decline of 9, 000 jobs. Overall, it discovered that 26, 000 government employees have lost their jobs since January.

The Trump administration has been vocal about its goal of reducing the federal government, despite the report’s lack of speculative information.

The federal government had more than 2, 925, 000 employees in 2023 as the nation’s single-largest employer. However, Trump has engaged in a mass layoff strategy based on the idea that “waste, fraud, and abuse” characterizes the government.

Under the direction of tech billionaire Elon Musk, the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is in charge of streamlining the federal workforce.

By the end of the year, hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be laid off, but many DOGE cuts are currently being challenged in federal court and through initiatives like the Merit Systems Protection Board, which protects employee rights.

Some employees are therefore paid off. There is currently severance pay for some employees. In the context of April’s job report, neither group would qualify as “unemployed.”

A total of 282, 227 federal jobs have been cut so far this year, according to Challenger, Grey & Christmas’s report, the majority of which could be attributed to DOGE’s cuts. Since April 2024, the government job cuts have increased by 680 percent.

Key government functions have already been affected by the downsizing. Due to staffing cuts, the Food and Drug Administration was reportedly suspending a quality control program in its Food Emergency Response Network earlier this month, according to Reuters’ news agency.

a more severe economic downturn

However, additional effects from government cuts may be felt by the employment market.

Additionally, the Trump administration has attempted to reduce government spending and reduce grants, contracts, and foreign aid initiatives that use US businesses as private contractors.

Due to budget cuts to government agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services, experts believe the gains made in the healthcare sector this month could be temporary.

These departments frequently provide funding for research projects on behalf of universities and private companies.

“The administration has been cutting funding for research institutions, particularly in higher education.” According to Jessica Fulton, a senior fellow at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a think tank specializing in Black communities, “they’ve been cutting grants that have been given for grants for particular communities, for mental health services for children.”

Fulton remarked, “Those are job-sustaining investments.” In upcoming job reports, “We will see the impact of those]cuts.”

She also cited recent legislative changes in Congress that could cause a decline in healthcare employment.

In order to fund tax cuts and other party priorities, critics claim that the current Republican-led budget bill would require changes to Medicaid, the government’s program for low-income people.

According to Fulton, “Any potential program cuts, such as Medicaid, could threaten those jobs in the future.” We are “waiting and watching,” he said.

Other sectors are also getting ready for economic turbulence. Several businesses, including Stellantis and the social media tycoon Snap, suspended investor guidance this week. In light of uncertainty resulting from tariff-driven uncertainty, Stellantis already laid off 900 workers in April.

The US GDP decreased by 0.3% annually during the first quarter of 2025, according to a report from the Commerce Department, compared to a 2.4% increase in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Consumer confidence dropped 7.9 points in April according to a separate report released by The Conference Board, an economic nonprofit, on Tuesday.

According to Stephanie Guichard, a senior economist at The Conference Board, “Consumer confidence dropped for a fifth consecutive month in April, falling to levels not seen since the COVID pandemic first appeared.”

Why has Mike Waltz been dropped as US National Security Advisor?

Donald Trump’s second-term’s first significant personnel change is a decision.

US national security adviser Mike Waltz was fired.

Donald Trump’s second-term personnel has undergone the first significant change.

He added a journalist to a chat group of senior officials discussing sensitive information a few weeks ago.

Is that the cause of his relocation, or something else?

Presenter:

Nick Clark

Guests:

Foreign Policy Magazine reporter John Haltiwanger’s reporting on US national security.

Republican political strategist Amy Koch.