Why has Donald Trump not spoken out about the famine in Gaza?

Last month, the US president made a public admission of “real starvation.”

Famine has been declared in Gaza City and the surrounding areas by a global hunger monitor supported by the UN.

Many nations, with one notable exception, were outraged by the confirmation that Israel had caused a human catastrophe.

There hasn’t been a word of response from the US State Department or the White House.

How long can the US remain silent while Israel claims to be “an outright lie”?

Is the Israeli military’s extensive assault on Gaza City and the drip-feeding of aid implicitly encouraged by silence?

Presenter:

Mohammed Jamjoom

Guests:

President of Refugees International is Jeremy Konyndyk.

Secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative, Mustafa Barghouti

Polish veto risks Ukraine’s crucial Starlink access amid refugee aid row

As the conflict between the government and the head of state deepens and undermines the once ironclad support of its war-torn neighbor, a Polish deputy prime minister said, access for Ukraine to Elon Musk’s satellite internet service Starlink could be slashed as a result of the president’s veto of a refugee aid bill.

In an effort to retaliate against the Russian forces, Poland pays for Ukraine to use Starlink, a crucial internet service provider for the country and its military.

Karol Nawrocki, the president of Poland, vetoed a bill that would provide for Ukrainian refugees’ future access to child benefits and healthcare on Monday.

Krzysztof Gawkowski, the deputy prime minister and head of digital affairs, claimed that Starlink’s agreement also provided the legal foundation for its operation in Ukraine.

He wrote on X that “Starlink internet is no longer available to Ukraine as it goes to war.”

The veto was criticized by Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a centrist. However, his government is unable to obtain the necessary two-thirds of the parliament.

“Especially not innocent children, we cannot punish people for losing their jobs,” he said. Agnieszka Dziemianowicz-Bak, the minister of labor, wrote on X, “This is the ABC of human decency.”

Gawkowski argued that Ukraine’s use of Starlink was threatened by Nawrocki’s veto.

“We want to keep paying for Ukraine’s internet through satellite. Unfortunately, the president’s disastrous choice has added a lot of complexity, and we will need to let our partners know when this support will end, he told the PAP news agency.

However, a spokesperson for Nawrocki confirmed to Reuters that a basis for Starlink’s payment could still be reinstated if a bill introduced by the president is approved by parliament by the end of the month.

Around one million refugees have settled in Poland’s neighbor since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. They are mostly children and women.

Poland is a significant transit point for Western aid and a key supporter of Ukraine, but attitudes toward Ukrainians have changed.

Nawrocki, a steadfast nationalist, had promised to reduce Ukrainians’ social security benefits in the run-up to his June 1 election victory.

Nawrocki, who took office this month, told reporters on Monday, “I will not change my mind, and I think this aid should only be available to Ukrainians who are committed to working in Poland.”

Nawrocki added that, unlike now, Ukrainians who do not work in Poland should not be able to receive free medical care.

He said, “This places us in a situation where Polish citizens are treated less favorably than our Ukrainian guests.”

According to Gawkowski, Poland purchased and subscribed to Starlink systems for Ukraine between 2022 and 2024 for a total of 77 million euros ($90 million).

Ukrainians in Poland will be considered for the potential effects of the move, according to a Ukrainian diplomatic source who told Reuters.

If their children attend Polish schools, they are currently eligible for the monthly family benefit of 800 zlotys ($218) per child. Germany and other EU nations have recently made proposals to reduce benefits.

Once elusive Mexican drug kingpin ‘El Mayo’ Zambada pleads guilty in US

Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, a former kingpin of Mexico, has admitted guilt to the charges of his decades-long involvement in the violent and infamous Sinaloa cartel and its role in the US’s drug influx, including cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl.

Zambada, the alleged co-founder of Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel, admitted guilt on Monday in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, to charges of racketeering and running a persistent criminal organization that prosecutors claimed was responsible for the import and distribution of sizable quantities of drugs.

His decades-long leadership of the Sinaloa cartel, along with Colorado’s maximum security prisoner Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, who is currently serving a life sentence, contributed to those accusations.

In Brooklyn, New York, US law enforcement officers [Brendan McDermid/Reuters] stand outside a federal courthouse ahead of the alleged Sinaloa cartel co-founder Ismael ‘El Mayo ‘Zambada’s plea hearing on drug-trafficking charges.

After the US Justice Department announced this month that it would not seek the death penalty for him or for Rafael Caro Quintero, another septuagenarian alleged Mexican drug lord facing US charges, Zambada agreed to enter a guilty plea.

Through a Spanish-language interpreter, he said, “I recognize the serious harm that illegal drugs have caused to the people of the United States and Mexico.” I apologize for everything and accept accountability for my actions.

Zambada pleaded guilty, describing the scope of the Sinaloa operation as well as the undercover agents who established relationships with Colombian cocaine producers and oversaw the smuggling of the drug across the US and the importation of the drug by boat and plane. border with Mexico

He also acknowledged that employees of him paid bribes to Mexican military and police officers “so they could operate freely,” dating back to when the cartel was just beginning to exist.

After the plane they were traveling touched down in New Mexico and landed alongside Joaquin Guzman Lopez, one of Joaquin Guzman’s sons, in July 2024, Zambada was detained. The Guzman family lawyer has refuted the claim that Zambada’s lawyer claimed Guzman Lopez kidnapped her.

Guzman Lopez has entered a not-guilty plea to charges of trafficking in marijuana in the US. If found guilty, US prosecutors have stated that they will not seek his death.

In response to US President Donald Trump’s increasing pressure on Mexico to dismantle the country’s powerful drug organizations, Mexico sent more than 20 suspected cartel members to the US this month. Mexico has claimed that the US Justice Department has given it assurances against seeking the death penalty.

Musk sues Apple, OpenAI over alleged AI competition suppression

Apple and ChatGPT maker OpenAI have been sued by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence startup xAI, alleging they illegally conspired to thwart artificial intelligence (AI) competition.

According to the lawsuit filed on Monday in a Texas federal court, Apple and OpenAI have “locked up markets to maintain their monopolies and stop innovators like X and xAI from competing.”

According to the billionaire’s complaint, Apple and OpenAI allegedly conspired to censor xAI’s products, including those available on the Apple App Store. Apple would have no excuses for not mentioning the X app and the Grok app more prominently in its App Store, according to xAI, citing its exclusive agreement with OpenAI.

According to the lawsuit, Apple and OpenAI made the announcement that they would incorporate ChatGPT into Apple’s operating system in an exclusive arrangement in June 2024.

“ChatGPT is the only generative AI chatbot that is integrated into the iPhone thanks to OpenAI’s exclusive arrangement.” According to the lawsuit, iPhone users have no choice but to use a generative AI chatbot for important tasks on their devices, even if they prefer to use more creative and creative products like xAI’s Grok.

Apple is the market leader in smartphones, accounting for 65 percent.

Both OpenAI and Silicon Valley tech giants did not respond to e-mail requests for comment right away.

Musk threatened to sue Cupertino, California-based Apple earlier this month, stating in a post on his social media platform X that Apple’s behavior “makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to #1 in the App Store.”

Apple’s collaboration with OpenAI enabled the integration of its ChatGPT AI platform into Mac, iPad, and iPhone computers.

Following Musk’s remarks earlier this month, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote in a post on X that “this is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon manipulates X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn’t like.”

Musk has a long history of pursuing bad companies by his side. The billionaire sued a number of companies that stopped advertising on X because of hostile language, including Nestle and Lego.

In March, Musk’s xAI purchased X to improve its chatbot training capabilities for $ 33 billion. Additionally, Musk has integrated the Grok chatbot into Tesla, his electric car company.

Elon Musk’s xAI, which was launched less than two years ago, competes with Chinese startup DeepSeek and Microsoft-backed OpenAI.

In order to stop OpenAI’s transition from a nonprofit to a for-profit organization, Musk is suing OpenAI and its CEO Altman separately in federal court in California. In 2015, Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit.

Numerous lawsuits have been brought against Apple for its App Store practices. A judge ordered Apple to increase competition for app payment options in a recent case involving Fortnite video game developer Epic Games.

Trump threatens new China tariffs over magnets

In response to a trade dispute between the two countries, US President Donald Trump has stated that China must increase its imports or “we have to charge them 200 percent tariff or something.”

The US president made the claim to reporters on Monday.

In retaliation for US tariff increases, China added a number of rare earth items and magnets to its export restriction list in April as retaliation. The country is becoming more concerned about rare earth elements and its ability to control their supply.

The global magnet market, which includes semiconductor chips used in products like smartphones, accounts for 90% of the global magnet market.

The US announced a 10% stake in Intel, one of the largest semiconductor chipmakers in the world, which uses rare earth materials for its products after the US announced its 10-percent stake in the company.

Imports of rare earth ore increased by more than 4,700 tonnes in July, according to data from the General Administration of Customs.

The US president made the remarks in response to the ongoing tariff standoff between the world’s two largest economies, which had earlier this month started to ease. A 90-day tariff deadline on Chinese goods was extended by President Trump’s executive order, giving more time for negotiations.

Don’t mourn the deaths of Palestinian journalists

Amna Homaid, a dear friend and relative, was brutally murdered a year ago, along with her 11th-year-old eldest child, Mahdi. Following Israeli media’s incitement against her, she was targeted.

The family was kept busy for the first days following her murder, and I still recall the flood of grief and condolences that came in. Condolences were extended to Amna’s husband by international media. There was a lot of coverage of her murder and the subsequent incitement. Posts about Amna and her accomplishments were all over social media, all with the same mournful tone.

In the meantime, mourners alternated between blame, pride, and grief. Blame targeted Amna’s choice to pursue the deadly path of journalism in a nation that is exempt from international law, not Israel, nor the world that allowed the killing.

The sadness vanished over time. No institution or government ever sought an investigation into Amna’s murder, and she gradually faded away. However, what transpired with her is the standard rather than the exception.

Hussam al-Masri, Mohammad Salama, Mariam Abu Daqqa, Ahmed Abu Aziz, and Moaz Abu Taha, who were all killed today in Khan Younis, are likely to experience this. The massacre is currently in the news, but it will soon be forgotten just like Amna’s murder was.

No one will hold Israel accountable for what it claims was a “mistake” and no one will conduct an investigation despite the fact that these journalists were protected civilians and were residing inside a hospital that is under special protection under international law.

Similar things happened two weeks ago when Mohammed al-Khaldi, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, Moamen Aliwa, and Mohammed al-Sharif were all killed. It was eventually forgotten as well. The eulogies in social media faded. Israel’s claims about Anas remain undisputed, and their killing, which was called “unacceptable” and a “grave breach of international law,” is still pending.

How persistently this pattern continues, as evidenced by Israel’s killing of Ismail al-Ghoul and Rami al-Rifi in June, its murder of journalist Marwa Musallam and her two brothers in March, and, most agonizingly for me, its assassination of my dear professor Refaat Alareer in December 2023.

The silence that follows each Israeli atrocity opens the way for another Israeli failure to hold Israel accountable.

Palestinians have come to accept that a journalist’s career is a death sentence for both their families and the journalists themselves after seeing this deadly cycle repeatedly repeat.

Anyone who decides to follow in Amna’s footsteps after her murder is now dissuaded by my family, which has long encouraged its young people to pursue media studies. They say, “The world turns its back on you on a lonely road.”

The family’s current journalists are advised to work quietly and avoid being in the spotlight.

My uncle Hamed, Amna’s father-in-law, promised to never let any of his six other children pursue careers even remotely related to journalism. No journalism or acting. I would never permit their media appearance.

“I once urged anyone to pursue journalism.” I would say that this is the realm of truth. I detested everything that came with the field after Amna, he continued.

Even Saed Hassouna, Amna’s husband, who is also a journalist and used to counsel young people interested in this field, gradually cut back on his work after his death.

Families left with nothing but unhealing traumas as a result of the silence and withdrawal. In Amna’s case, her 10-year-old son, Mohammed, who witnessed his mother and brother pass away before his eyes and personally informed Ismail al-Ghoul that his family was submerged in rubble, continues to experience trauma attacks. He yells at people to let him go to the Israelis, who also killed his mother, so they also kill him whenever he’s depressed.

Ghina, Amna’s five-year-old daughter, is still waiting for her return, and she frequently yells, “Where did you take my mom”?

Nearly 23 months into this bloody conflict, only the world can express condolences for Palestinians who have died. It makes every effort to prevent anyone from feeling even the slightest bit responsible for what is happening in Gaza.

244 Palestinian journalists have already died in Gaza right now. Every one of them has received the same treatment; even those who have been thoroughly documented have not been charged with war crimes. What will come in the wake of Shireen Abu Akleh’s murder in Jenin in 2022 as a result of an Israeli sniper’s actions. Even her American citizenship prevented her from receiving justice, despite American media investigations.

Don’t mourn Palestinian journalists if it makes you feel less guilty or that you have acted in their best interest. Justice is what we need, not more eulogies. The world can do the world’s least to help Mariam, Amna, Anas, and the other 24 of Gaza’s slain journalists’ orphans.