Palestinian child shot dead in West Bank by Israeli forces amid land grabs

In the wake of more violent raids by soldiers and settlers and the Israeli government’s plan to seize more land, Israeli forces have shot and killed a Palestinian child in the occupied West Bank.

Amr Ali Qabha, 13, was shot with live ammunition in a Yabad street on Friday, according to local Palestinian sources, and ambulances were unable to arrive because of soldiers’ blocking of his path. He was denied medical care.

According to the Wafa news agency, Qabha’s father attempted to reach him but was severely beaten and detained by Israeli soldiers. The child was later declared dead at the hospital after an ambulance managed to transport him there.

Since Israel’s occupation of Gaza began on October 7, 2023, more than 1, 000 Palestinians have died in the occupied West Bank. At least 204 of those figures were children.

Last month, there were at least 129 Israeli settler attacks that left Palestinians dead or property damage, according to the UN humanitarian office (OCHA).

More than 2, 200 Israeli settler attacks were reported between the beginning of 2024 and the end of 2025, according to OCHA figures, resulting in more than 5, 200 Palestinian injuries.

Nearly 36, 000 Palestinians were forced to flee across the West Bank during that same time as Israeli military operations, settler violence, or home demolitions carried out by the Israeli government.

ongoing harassment and raids

Israeli soldiers continued their raids across the occupied territory on Friday, which included arrests, and aid settlers in their attacks on Palestinians.

Israeli forces were pelting Palestinians in the village of Raba, Jenin, as they were protesting the confiscation of their land and property.

Palestinians who protested the Israeli-occupied West Bank’s Raba, close to Jenin, on July 18, 2025, are surrounded by Israeli forces with tear gas.

Five Palestinians were taken into custody in the town of Dura, which is located south of Hebron, as a result of a raid that included the looting of several homes.

In Kafr Laqif, in the same district of Qalqiliya, six more were detained, and two more were detained in Sir, in the same district.

After being summoned by Israeli intelligence to the Gush Etzion settlement, a Palestinian man was detained in Bethlehem. One person was shot and wounded before his arrest in a raid on Nablus, which resulted in his arrest. In the refugee camp in Askar, another arrest was reported.

About 1, 000 people without water because of Israeli soldiers’ destruction of a main water pipeline in the village of Umm Safa near Ramallah.

Families living in a residential building were made to leave in Beit Hanina, East Jerusalem, to make way for the demolition of their homes. Following an order from the Israeli government, the Palestinian families were forced to demolish the buildings themselves because the municipality would fine them more if the building is destroyed.

In the village of al-Malih in the northeast of the occupied territory, armed Israeli settlers launched a violent attack earlier on Friday. According to Wafa, they vandalized tents and other property, killing at least 117 Palestinian sheep, and also snatched at least 117 sheep from the country.

Israel’s strategy for dividing the upcoming Palestinian state

Despite international criticism, Israeli authorities intend to illegally seize additional Palestinian land as well.

The United Kingdom objected to Israel’s announcement on Friday to renew plans for construction in the occupied West Bank’s E1 area, which would divide the Palestinian territory.

A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office said the UK is “sheeply opposed” to the announcement by Israel’s civil administration’s central planning bureau to reintroduce the E1 settlement plan, which has been stalled since 2021.

According to the statement, the plan would divide a future Palestinian state into two, and “mark a flagrant violation of international law” by constructing more than 3, 000 houses east of Jerusalem.

West Bank
Israeli settlers in the Palestinian town of Burqa, near Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on July 15, 2025 [Mohammed Torokman/Reuters]

In a joint statement released on Friday, US Democratic Senators Bernie Sanders, Peter Welch, Jeff Merkley, and Chris Van Hollen condemned Israel’s long-awaited plan to annihilate and expel Palestinian communities in Masafer Yatta, in the South Hebron Hills.

Hezbollah says it will not give up weapons despite US proposal

Naim Qassem, the leader of Hezbollah, made an apparent refutation of a proposal the United States had made to the leadership of Lebanon last month.

Qassem argued on Friday that if there was no “resistance” in the nation, the Israeli army would expand there.

In a video message, he declared, “We will not give up to Israel, and Israel will not give our weapons to us.”

Qassem’s comments could have harmed US diplomat Thomas Barrack’s efforts to reach a Lebanon-Lebanese peace agreement last month.

After receiving a response to his proposals from the Lebanese authorities earlier this month, Barrack, Washington’s ambassador to Turkiye and special envoy to Syria, stated that a “go-forward plan” was in the works. He continued to express that he was “unbelievably satisfied.”

After more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, Lebanese leaders, who are now in power, have promised a state-monopoly on supplying weapons and have pressed Israel to abide by a ceasefire reached in November.

Nawaf Salam, the leader of Lebanon, told Al Jadeed TV on Friday that while fear of an Israeli uprising was justified, the US proposal was an “opportunity” that could lead to Israel’s withdrawal.

Hezbollah’s weapons must now be under the Lebanese state’s control, Salam reaffirmed that they played a significant role in the 2000 liberation of South Lebanon from Israel.

Qassem, however, suggested that the issue of granting the state a right to use weapons should be prioritized over the issue of putting an existential risk on Lebanon.

We are prepared to talk about a defense strategy or national security strategy after we address that threat, he said.

Since Israel’s founding in 1948, Hezbollah claims that the Lebanese armed forces have failed to stop Israeli crimes against humanity.

“Ready for a defensive confrontation,” you say.

Hezbollah was ordered to withdraw its fighters from the Israeli-occupied territory under the terms of the ceasefire.

Israel planned to leave Lebanon, but it has continued to use them in five strategic areas and has launched deadly attacks against the ceasefire almost daily.

In the previous year’s conflict, Israel dealt Hezbollah a significant blow by assassinating its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, as well as other commanders, and destroying much of its arsenal.

Qassem gave the impression that Hezbollah was unable to rebel against or repel Israeli forces occupying South Lebanon.

He claimed, however, that the group would continue to fight if a full-fledged war were to arise.

Trump says newly signed crypto law will establish ‘American dominance’

Donald Trump, the president of the United States, signed new cryptocurrency legislation that is regarded as a turning point for the industry, according to experts in Washington, DC.

The US president praised the GENIUS Act, which establishes consumer protections and regulations for stablecoin, a type of cryptocurrency whose value is tied to a fixed currency or commodity, while speaking from the White House on Friday.

A total of three cryptocurrency bills passed through the US legislature as a result of what Trump dubbed “crypto week.”

In the end, Trump’s desk was only given stablecoin legislation.

The US House of Representatives sent two additional bills to the Senate on Thursday, one of which would ban government-issued digital currencies and the other would set more stringent rules for cryptocurrency products’ regulatory classifications.

Trump praised Friday’s bill-signing ceremony as “a huge step cementing the US’s dominance of global finance and crypto technology.”

Legislations like the GENIUS Act, according to industry advocates, will help to expand the use of cryptocurrency in the US. They claim that the adoption of digital currencies has been hampered by a lack of regulatory clarity.

However, some people have expressed concern about the Trump family’s involvement in the crypto industry, including its ownership of World Liberty Financial, a company that created the stablecoin USD1 themselves.

They point out that corruption is a possibility because recent flurry of Republican-led legislation does not address whether a president can hold interests in cryptocurrency.

Democrats also criticized the GENIUS Act for creating an unfit regulatory framework that could lead to large corporations’ own private cryptocurrencies and raise long-term financial risks.

Trump continued to support the crypto industry, including by advancing his campaign pledge to establish a “crypto reserve” at the national level, as he did on Friday.

Trump also referred to his administration as a “hard pivot” from former president Joe Biden’s aggressive approach to investigating crimes involving cryptocurrency.

Trump has suspended a special Department of Justice enforcement team and ended several Biden-era cryptocurrency investigations since taking office for a second term in January.

At the White House, some of the cryptocurrency leaders who had previously been the subject of US government investigations were present.

At the signing ceremony, Trump told them, “You’ve come a long way since the Biden administration, when they had no idea what you were all talking about. Half of you were indefinitely indefinitely under arrest.”

He addressed industry figures by name, including Brian Armstrong, Chris Pavlovski, and Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, who had all been the subject of SEC (SEC) investigations under Biden.

Trump said, “Let me tell the entire crypto community that you have been mocked, dismissed, and counted out for years.”

Venezuela frees 10 Americans in swap for deported migrants in El Salvador

In exchange for the release of American citizens and political prisoners imprisoned in Venezuela, a global agreement has been reached. Venezuelans who have been deported from the United States and imprisoned in El Salvador can now go back to their home countries.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed on Friday that the agreement had resulted in the release of 10 Americans.

Ten Americans detained in Venezuela are on their way to freedom, Rubio wrote on social media.

Nayib Bukele, president of El Salvador, also praised the agreement, claiming that all Venezuelan detainees who have been detained in his nation have been “handed over.”

A US ally, Bukele, said in a statement on social media that “we conducted this exchange in return for a significant number of Venezuelan political prisoners, people that the regime had held as hostages for years, as well as all of the American citizens it was holding as hostages.”

These travelers are currently traveling to El Salvador, where they will stop briefly before returning home.

In order to release political prisoners in Venezuela, Bukele has previously stated that he would be willing to do so. Nicolas Maduro, a socialist leader in Venezuela since 2013, has long been criticized by him and US President Donald Trump.

“This operation is the outcome of months of negotiations with a tyrannical regime that had long refused to release one of its most precious bargaining tools: its hostages,” Bukele continued.

252 Americans who have been deported to El Salvador have been confirmed to the Venezuelan government.

Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello also disclosed to the media that seven children who had been deported from the US had also been sent to Venezuela.

The complex, multifaceted negotiations that underpin President Donald Trump’s campaign for widespread deportation in the US are just the latest instance of this.

There have long been rumors about such a deal between the three nations.

However, the arrangement raises questions about how other foreign policy priorities might be influenced by Trump’s mass deportation push. Additionally, there has been renewed scrutiny of how people who have been deported from the US are treated in foreign nations without any connection.

A contentious deportation

More than 200 people were transferred to a maximum-security facility known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre (CECOT) in El Salvador in March after Venezuela protested the deportation of its citizens from the US.

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a law used only three times during the war, was invoked by President Trump to facilitate that transfer.

The US leader argued that illegal immigration into the country was a “invasion” of criminals from other nations.

However, his use of that law has been contested constitutionally by the courts.

El Salvador has also been accused of alleged human rights violations, including beatings, torture, and sleep deprivation, by critics.

Bukele’s own efforts to impose a mass incarceration include the CECOT prison. With a capacity of up to 40 000 people, it opened in 2023.

Trump argued that because the Venezuelans belonged to gangs like Tren de Aragua, deporting them was a necessary step. On Friday, Bukulele echoed that accusation, saying that all deportees from Venezuela were “accused of being a part of the criminal organization Tren de Aragua.”

However, some of the men are known to have no criminal records.

Some detained Venezuelans have since filed lawsuits, alleging that some of their attorneys were targeted because of their clothing choices or tattoos, which US immigration officials then used to falsely connect them to gangs.

Deportations by third parties

Additionally, the Trump administration has argued that immigrants who are deported to third-party nations like El Salvador must be in their homes.

Venezuela has previously turned down deportations from the US. Trump and Maduro’s relationship is infamously conflicted. Trump even offered a $15 million bounty for information that might lead to Maduro’s arrest in 2020.

Trump has instead sought negotiations with the Venezuelan government during his second term in place of returning to the “maximum pressure” campaign that defined his first term as president.

The Maduro government has responded by saying it is ready to accept US deportees from Venezuela.

For instance, it hosted US special envoy Richard Grenell in Caracas in the middle of January, leading to the release of six Americans imprisoned in Venezuela. Following a second meeting with Grenell, the Maduro administration also let a US Air Force veteran who was being held in custody in May.

According to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, Grenell’s task was to “return all US detainees to their homes.” How many people are still living there?

However, Maduro’s presidency is still disputed by the US government. Due to fraud allegations, Maduro’s contested election for a third term in 2024 has weakened his reputation internationally.

Controversies over massive deportations

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has had its own controversy. After Grenell and Marco Rubio made rival deals, the Trump White House “botched” the agreement to free Americans in Venezuela, according to The New York Times last week.

According to The Times, Rubio had suggested a deal with Venezuelans imprisoned in El Salvador. Grenell had, however, suggested alternative terms that would allow Venezuela to maintain its trade relationship with Chevron, which would have greatly benefited its struggling economy.

Apparently, there was confusion and uncertainty as a result.

Additionally, the Trump administration’s apparent unwillingness to repatriate immigrants who may have been unfairly deported has drawn criticism abroad.

The Trump administration was given the order in June by District Judge James Boasberg to ensure that the Venezuelan men held in El Salvador had access to justice. Boasberg made the point in his decision that they could not contest both their deportations and the rumor that they were gang members because of their swift removal in March.

A federal appeals court in Washington has, however, put off that court order.

The previous Trump administration’s claims that it was unable to release the deported men from the CECOT prison are also raised in doubt by Friday’s agreement. The deportees are a problem that the US government cannot solve while they are in El Salvador, according to Trump officials.

Additionally, El Salvador’s president, Bukele, claimed he lacked the authority to stop the men from returning. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who was briefly detained in CECOT after being wrongfully deported in March, was the subject of a conversation Bukele made in an Oval Office appearance in April.

The query is absurd, I say. How does one enter the United States through smuggling? According to Bukele, “I don’t have the authority to return him to the United States.”

Slovenia’s parliament votes to legalise assisted dying

After a majority of voters in a referendum, Slovenia’s parliament passed a law granting terminally ill adults the right to end their lives.

With 50 votes in favor, 34 against, and three abstentions, the bill was approved by legislators on Friday, allowing for assisted dying in cases of intolerable suffering after all treatment options have been exhausted.

According to Slovenia’s STA news agency, the right to assisted dying won’t be available in the event of intolerable suffering brought on by mental illness.

In the upcoming weeks, it is anticipated to become effective.

In a consultative referendum last year, 55% of Slovenians voted against assisted suicide. Opponents of the law may attempt to sway enough votes to avert a new referendum.

Despite several amendments during its passage through parliament, the nation’s Commission for Medical Ethics announced this week that it remained firm in its position that the bill poses high ethical risks.

The “right]to assisted dying] does not represent a defeat for medicine,” according to Tereza Novak, a lawmaker from the ruling Freedom Movement, which had supported the bill.

The liberal MP claimed that it would be wrong for medicine to prevent people from dying if they so choose, and that it cannot do so.

The bill has been denounced by the conservative Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), who claims it “opens the door to a culture of death, … the loss of human dignity, and the minimization of the value of life, especially for the most vulnerable.”

The vote places the central European nation, along with Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Belgium, and some other states in the United States, among those that allow terminally ill people to receive medical care to end their lives.