Expectations low ahead of EU-China 50th anniversary summit in Beijing

As the EU and China celebrate 50 years of diplomatic relations amid waning tensions, Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa, top EU officials, are scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

The 25th EU-China summit will take place on Thursday in Beijing, where Von der Leyen and Costa will lead the European Commission and the European Council, respectively. Due to the ongoing political unrest between Brussels and Beijing, von der Leyen and Costa were unsure whether they would actually meet with Xi in the days leading up to the one-day summit.

According to a report from The Financial Times, Xi declined to attend the meeting, which had originally been scheduled to be a two-day summit in Brussels.

Only this week did China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs officially confirm that Xi, von der Leyen, Costa, and Li Qiang, the premier of China, would meet.

Beijing has billed the event as a chance to rekindle relations with Europe, according to Marina Rudyak, an assistant professor at the German-based Institute of Chinese Studies.

According to Rudyak, “let’s normalize the relations, let’s focus on pragmatic cooperation, let’s focus on where we agree and accommodate where we disagree,” which is a trend that the Chinese side has consistently observed.

Chinese state media published a positive analysis of EU-China relations ahead of the summit, which is frequently seen as an indirect way for Chinese officials to address domestic issues.

Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Chinese-EU relationship, described the relationship as “one of the most influential bilateral relationships in the world” during a press conference on Tuesday.

According to Guo, “China and the EU relationship is now at a crucial moment, building on previous successes and launching a new chapter.”

Guo continued, noting that the international landscape is becoming more and more turbulent, with “unilateralism and protectionism” emerging as new opportunities and challenges for the relationship.

Tensions exist between Ukraine and Xinjiang.

Due to a number of ongoing and arduous disputes, Beijing has offered to resolve a potential conflict with Brussels. However, Western observers have low expectations for the EU and China’s outcome.

Although the EU and China frequently disagree on human rights and political oppression, the relationship changed when the EU sanctioned Chinese officials for oppressing ethnic minority Uighur Muslims in 2021.

Members of the European Parliament and several think tanks were among the 10 Europeans that China personally sanctioned.

Prior to the EU-China summit, Beijing lifted sanctions on the European MEPs in a show of goodwill, but other political rifts have persisted as a result of China’s ongoing, close relationship with Russia, which has sparked Russians’ 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

In light of the ongoing international sanctions, Beijing is also widely believed to be able to keep Russia’s economy afloat, particularly by purchasing Russian energy exports.

China has also been accused of avoiding the arms embargo by selling “dual-use” goods to Russia for both military and civilian purposes.

China has defended its actions, claiming that it has long desired a “negotiation, ceasefire, and peace” in Ukraine.

Despite Rudyak’s report at Heidelberg University that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reportedly told his EU counterpart that Beijing did not want to see Russia lose the war with Ukraine because it would free up US attention, European officials were alarmed in June.

The bloc, which is currently looking into Beijing’s economic ties with Russia, last week sanctioned two Chinese banks for the first time as part of its most recent wave of sanctions against Moscow in an effort to end the conflict. The EU’s sanctions list also included five Chinese-based businesses.

The Chinese government threatened to implement its own measures against Europe after its Ministry of Commerce warned that the sanctions against Chinese banks and companies “seriously harmed” trade and economic ties with the EU.

These issues, according to William Yang, a senior analyst for Northeast Asia at the Brussels-based nonpartisan think tank Crisis Group, will obscure the EU-China summit on Thursday.

In light of the ongoing US-Russia competition, Beijing continues to support its relationship with Russia, Yang said.

“With these fundamental contradictions, it’s unlikely that the upcoming summit will have any significant breakthroughs.”

A close but turbulent trade union

The economic relationship between the EU and China has recently become a source of tension.

China is the third-largest trading partner of the EU for goods and services, but EU officials are concerned about their skyrocketing trade deficit with China, which, according to EU trade data, increased by 30.8% ($359bn) between 2015 and 2024 to reach 305.8 billion ($359bn) last year.

China has long accused the EU and its members of “dumping” their cheap state-subsidized exports on the European market, but the situation has recently gotten worse.

The debate over trade and balance in Europe is “unfolding,” according to the statement from the United States. This is a unique feature of Europe, according to Rudyak.

“Europe is genuinely concerned about its main industries, including automotive,” he said. She continued, “There is a great concern about Chinese EV overcapacity being submerged on the EU market at prices that European companies cannot compete, and subsidised Chinese overcapacity crowding out European backbone industries.”

Chinese automakers have also suffered as a result of Beijing’s recent decision to curtail the export of rare earth minerals and magnets, which are essential components for many electric vehicles and auto parts.

Beijing, for its part, has launched its own “dumping” investigations into Europe, focusing on important goods like pork and brandy.

Beijing is frustrated with Europe, even as Beijing attempts to reshape relations, according to Wang Yi-wei, director of Renmin University’s EU Research Center.

According to Wang, the EU’s frequently conflicting approach to its relationship with the US and China ranks at the top of the list for Beijing.

China has occasionally made foolhardy predictions about how Europe would resist US influence. However, the EU tries to strike a balance between opposing American dominance and cooperating with the US, including supporting its efforts to contain China, such as by justifying tariff disputes as addressing “Chinese challenges,” Wang said in remarks shared with Al Jazeera.

China wants the EU to stop presenting their relationship as one of “competitive cooperation” and instead let them view it through the lens of “cooperative competition,” he asked.

Senior EU analyst Marta Mucznik of the Crisis Group said observers hope that the summit will at least open up channels of communication between officials from both sides with low expectations for a breakthrough.

EU warns Israel as Trump’s envoy heads to Europe for Gaza truce talks

Israel has been warned by the European Union about its actions in Gaza as the world’s hunger crisis worsens, with at least 101 Palestinians dying from starvation.

The EU’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, issued the warning on Tuesday as the US announced this week that the special envoy for talks on a ceasefire in Gaza would be traveling to Europe.

Kallas stated in a post on X that “any option is open to discussion” if Israel doesn’t fulfill its promises to increase humanitarian aid to the besieged enclave.

She added that she had spoken with the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Saar to “remember our understanding of aid flow” and that the Israeli military was required to stop killing civilians at distribution points.

Following a meeting of the EU to review its relations with Israel over the country’s growing criticism of its occupation of Gaza, Kallas claimed that Israel had agreed to improve the humanitarian situation there.

There were also promises to increase aid truck numbers, crossing points, and routes to distribution locations.

However, according to aid officials, the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza has not increased despite the agreement.

Meanwhile, the US announced that Steve Witkoff, Trump’s envoy, will be visiting a European nation for talks on a truce and the creation of a “corridor” for aid to Gaza. According to media reports, he might then travel to the Middle East to continue his discussions.

Strong hope

Witkoff will visit the Italian city of Rome on Wednesday, according to Axios, and on Thursday will meet with senior Qatari envoy Ron Dermer and Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer.

According to the website, Witkoff will travel from Rome to Doha, Qatar, toward the end of the week if progress is made, citing two US and Israeli sources with knowledge of the details.

The US State Department stated to reporters that Witkoff was traveling to the area with “a strong hope that we will come forward with another ceasefire as well as a humanitarian corridor for aid to flow.”

Further information about the corridor was declined by spokesperson Tammy Bruce.

As we all know, this could be a dynamic that is constantly changing, but I would caution against that.

Israel stopped all goods from entering the country in March, but starting in May, it has started distributing aid gradually, primarily through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is supported by the US, and by avoiding the UN.

Since the GHF began its operations in late May, more than 1, 000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces in south and central Gaza, according to the UN.

The GHF sites were or were close to the victims’ deaths.

The deaths come at a time when Gaza’s population is rising, with health officials reporting 80 children among the 101 deaths reported since the war started.

The majority of deaths occurred recently.

The total number of victims, including four children, was 15 on Tuesday alone.

Israel disputes the UN’s “false and exaggerated statistics” regarding the killings at its aid sites, while the GHF also rejects what it claims are “false and exaggerated statistics.”

Qatar demands more regulation.

For months, the US, Qatar, and Egypt have been pressing for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, but they have so far failed to find a solution.

Through the mediation, the two sides have been talking about a US proposal for a 60-day truce where Hamas would release Palestinian prisoners and allow humanitarian aid. They would also begin negotiations to put an end to the war in its entirety during that time.

Despite some minor improvements, Hamas and Israel continue to disagree on how far Israeli troops will withdraw after a ceasefire is reached, according to officials.

Meanwhile, Qatar has urged Israel to put more pressure on the US and the rest of the world.

Majed al-Ansari, a representative for the Israeli government, stated at a conference that “the Israeli government does not view Palestinians as human beings” and that Middle Eastern security has been threatened by Israel’s careless actions, not just in Gaza but also in Yemen, Syria, and Iran.

The conditions remain, but we are optimistic about the ceasefire talks. The terms of the talks won’t change, he said if there is no change to the Israeli directive to not reach a deal and to sabotage any discussions. If there isn’t serious pressure from the international community, particularly the United States, the situation will change.

‘Historic’ ruling on climate change by World Court: What to expect

Many consider this landmark development of international law to be the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) first-ever opinion on climate change.

During the ICJ’s biggest-ever case, judges sifted through tens of thousands of pages of written submissions and heard two weeks of oral arguments.

When the court’s 15 judges deliver their findings at 3 p.m. local time on Wednesday (13:00 GMT), they will attempt to combine various aspects of environmental law into one unified international standard.

The court’s “advisory opinion” is expected to be several hundred pages because it clarifies nations’ obligations to stop climate change and what happens to polluters if they don’t.

What obligations do nations have to deal with climate change, as the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and other countries bringing the case first asked the court to answer?

The court should not address the issue, according to experts in the fossil fuel industry who claim that UNFCCC legal provisions are sufficient.

However, opponents of climate change argue that the ICJ should make more of a reference to maritime and human rights laws.

Vanuatu argued that the ICJ was uniquely positioned to take into account “the entire corpus of international law” in its opinion and that The Hague judges should take this into account.

The island nation claimed that the ICJ is “the only international jurisdiction with a general competence over all areas of international law” that allows for such a response.

The judges will also consider whether countries that contribute most to the climate crisis should have legal repercussions.

The landmark Paris Agreement on climate change, which does not explicitly provide for direct compensation for past harm caused by pollution, was referenced by the United States, the largest historical emitter of greenhouse gases, and other top polluters.

Many nations are sensitive to liability issues in climate negotiations, but wealthy nations in 2022 agreed to establish a fund to assist weakened nations in resolving the current impacts brought on by previous pollution.

We anticipate that the ICJ will rule that states are legally required to deal with climate change. On the eve of the ruling, Vanuatu’s Minister for Climate Change Ralph Regenvanu stated that you must respect other states and their right to self-determination.

“Colonialism is gone … you know, supposedly gone,” Regenvanu said, “but this is a hangover where your conduct as a state continues to impair the future of the people of another country.”

Under international law, you are not legally permitted to do that. Additionally, he added, “There must be reparations for your actions if you have already caused this harm.”

Before Wednesday’s ruling, Vishal Prasad, one of 27 then-law students from the University of the South Pacific who pushed for Vanuatu to bring the case back in 2019, describes himself as “emotional, scared, nervous, and anxious.”

According to Prasad, who is currently the group’s director, climate change poses an “existential problem” for young people in places like Kiribati, Tuvalu, and the Marshall Islands.

Every high tide, he said, “they are witnessing the effects of climate change.”

According to Prasad, Pacific Islanders are known for their “wayfinding.”

‘Changed the planet of rock’: Tributes pour in for rock icon Ozzy Osbourne

At the age of 76, Ozzy Osbourne, a pioneer who founded heavy metal music and later became a reality television icon, passed away on Tuesday.

His family released a statement about his death, but it did not specify the cause or location. Osbourne had recently been receiving Parkinson’s disease treatment.

Two weeks after giving his hometown of Birmingham, England, a farewell performance, he passed away.

Family, friends, and musicians recited this tribute:

Sharon Osbourne’s wife and children sign a family statement.

Our beloved Ozzy Osbourne passed away this morning, and we are saddened more than words can express. He was surrounded by love and his family. At this time, we ask that everyone respect our family’s privacy,” the statement read.

The singer’s wife, Sharon Osbourne, and their three children, Jack Osbourne, Kelly Osbourne, and Aimee Osbourne, also signed the statement. The statement was signed by Louis Osbourne, his son, and his ex-wife Thelma Riley, also.

Aston Villa football team: “A special connection.”

One of Aston Villa’s most recognizable fans was honored.

Villan Ozzy Osbourne, a renowned rockstar, has passed away, according to Aston Villa Football Club. Ozzy always had a special connection to the club and the area he was raised in, according to the club’s statement, who was based close to Villa Park.

Tony Iommi of Black Sabbath: “Heartbreaking news.”

Tony Iommi, the co-founder of Black Sabbath, wrote on Facebook: “I just can’t believe it! Only a few weeks after our performance at Villa Park, my dear friend Ozzy passed away.

There won’t be another like him, he said, “There is just such heartbreaking news that I can’t really find the words.”

“Our brother has been lost by Geezer, Bill, and I.” Sharon and the entire Osbourne family are in my thoughts. Rest in Oz’s peace.

Elton John remarked, “He was a dear friend.”

Elton John expressed his sadness at hearing the news.

A true legend, and he was a dear friend and a great trailblazer who made his name in the pantheon of rock gods. One of the funniest people I’ve ever met was also him. He will be sorely missed. I extend my love and condolences to Sharon and the family, John said.

Billie Joe Armstrong, the frontman of Green Day,

No remark. In a caption that appears next to a photo he uploaded to his Instagram account, Armstrong writes, “We love you, Ozzy.”

Metallica shares a photo of her tribute

Metallica, a heavy metal band, honored Ozzy Osbourne by sharing a photo of themselves with him on X with a simple broken heart emoji.

Motörhead: “We’ve lost a dear friend.

Metal group Motörhead honored Osbourne by sharing a tribute photo with Lemmy, the band’s late frontman.

Black Sabbath was “the template,” according to Nirvana.

Osbourne and Black Sabbath are acknowledged in a brief message posted on Nirvana’s official X account, thanking them for inspiring the recognizable grunge rock band.

Robert Plant from Led Zeppelin: “What a journey.

In a social media post, Plant wrote, “Farewell Ozzy, what a journey, sail on up there, finally at peace,” “you truly changed the planet of rock.”

Osbourne was a legend and a provocateur, according to PETA.

Osbourne was a vocal supporter of animal welfare, despite the famously biting the head off a dead bat at a 1982 concert.

Ozzy Osbourne was a legend and a provocateur, but PETA will remember the “Prince of Darkness” most for the gentle side he showed to animals, most recently cats, by using his fame to criticize painful, crippling declawing mutilations, according to PETA senior vice president Lisa Lange, who spoke to Yahoo News.

Rod Stewart: “Sleep well, my friend.”

Bye, bye Ozzy, bye. My friend, please rest, Stewart said on Instagram.

I’ll see you there sooner rather than later.

Ronnie Wood from The Rolling Stones: “I’m so sad.

I’m so sorry to learn Ozzy Osbourne passed away. What a lovely goodbye performance did he deliver at Birmingham’s Back To The Beginning, “Wood added.

Sony Music: Osbourne’s music “will live on.”

His music will continue to be heard, Sony Music stated in a statement.

The statement read, “Sony Music is deeply saddened by the passing of our legendary recording artist Ozzy Osbourne.

He “redefined the sound and spirit of rock music” and “made his millions of fans all over the world an unmistakable voice and icon”!

UK charity for Parkinson’s

Many people will be shocked to learn of Ozzy Osbourne’s passing soon after his celebratory homecoming show. Ozzy and his entire family helped so many families in the same situation by opening up about both his diagnosis and his life with Parkinson’s, according to a statement from the organization.

They normalized difficult conversations and made others feel less alone despite a condition that is increasing and affecting more people every day.

Yungblud: “You were the greatest.

Rocker Yungblud expressed shock at Osbourne’s passing in a photo he shared on Instagram, saying he never anticipated him to “die so soon.” In their final encounter, he referred to the Black Sabbath legend as being “so full of life.”

Interpol takes whaling activist, Sea Shepherd founder off wanted list

Interpol, a global police agency, announced that Paul Watson, the anti-whaling activist and founder of the Sea Shepherd conservation organization, is no longer in Japan due to an incident with a whaling ship in 2010.

The Canadian-American Watson, 74, is renowned for his daring deeds, including confronting and disrupting whaling ships on the high seas, and Interpol had issued a “red notice” for his arrest at Japan’s request.

According to Watson’s Paris-based attorney William Julie, Interpol has now decided that the notice was “disproportionate.”

A person is referred to as an Interpol red notice when a person is notified that they are requesting a search and temporary arrest pending legal action from the relevant country’s judicial system, in this case, Japan.

The Captain Paul Watson Foundation quoted the activist as saying, “Finally I am free.”

Since I was first detained in Frankfurt, Germany in May 2012, the Japanese whalers have followed me for 14 years, according to Watson.

“A very powerful nation has pursued an incredible goal with no end in sight despite having unrestricted resources.”

The arrest notice for Watson had been removed, according to a spokesperson for Interpol’s Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files (CCF).

The Kingdom of Denmark’s decision was based on “new facts,” such as the refusal to extradite Mr. Watson. The spokesperson claimed that this is in line with industry standards.

On a more than ten-year-old Japanese arrest warrant, Watson was detained and detained in Greenland in July 2024, he was accused of causing harm to a whaling ship and injuring a whaler. After Denmark turned down the Japanese’s request for extradition in December for the incident in 2010, he was freed.

On December 20, Watson left Denmark and drove his children to France, where they study.

The CCF stated in a statement that the agency’s red notice “did not meet Interpol’s standards,” citing the “disproportionate nature of the allegations,” the “considerable passage of time” since the allegations, Denmark’s refusal to extradite him, and the fact that several other countries refused to respond to Japan’s arrest or extradition requests.

The president of Sea Shepherd France, Lamya Essemlali, applauded the “good news” that Watson could still be detained and taken to Japan for trial.

Columbia University suspends, expels nearly 80 students over Gaza protests

Numerous students who took part in demonstrations against Israel’s occupation of Gaza have been subject to severe punishments at Columbia University in the United States, including expulsion, suspension from classes, and revoked academic degrees.

Nearly 80 students have been expelled or suspended for up to three years as a result of their participation in antiwar protests, according to a statement released by the student activist group Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which has demanded that the university cut all financial ties to Israel.

Columbia announced on Tuesday that its most recent student punishment was related to the “disruption of Butler Library in May 2025 and the encampment during Alumni Weekend in spring 2024.”

The university wrote that “disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policies and rules, and such violations will inevitably lead to consequences.”

The CUAD group claimed that the university’s student sanctions “hugely exceed precedent for teach-ins or non-Palestine-related building occupations.”

“We won’t be deterred,” he declares. The organization continued, “We are committed to the struggle for Palestinian liberation.”

In 2024, the pro-Palestinian student camps at Columbia University sparked a global movement to protest Israel’s unrelenting occupation of the Gaza Strip. When Columbia University allowed hundreds of New York City police officers to work on the campus, which resulted in dozens of arrests, the protest sites eventually were disbanded.

Students protesting the Butler Library during final exams in May of this year occupied the university, demanding divestment from businesses connected to the Israeli military and showing solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.

After what it called a “disruption during” the “reading period,” the Columbia University’s Judicial Board confirmed that it had issued expulsions, suspensions, and degree revocations. This was “the final set of findings from that period,” it said, not how many students were expelled.

The Ivy League university is negotiating with US President Donald Trump’s administration to recoup about $400,000 in federal funding. The New York City-based institution received funding from the Trump administration because it “inadequately protected Jewish students from severe and pervasive harassment” it claimed.

Students booed former trustee Claire Shipman, the acting president of Columbia, during a May graduation ceremony for her role in repressing pro-Palestinian protests.

Harvard University, a fellow Ivy League institution, has responded to pressure to alter its policies by suing the Trump administration, which has also been subject to billions in funding cuts from the government.

At least 15 people, including a six-week-old baby, died from hunger and malnutrition within a 24-hour period, according to health officials, as a result of Israel’s ongoing siege on the Gaza Strip, according to the latest disciplinary measures taken by Columbia against students on Tuesday.