Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

What is holding up the implementation of the Teesta River Project?

The transboundary Teesta River’s distribution has been the subject of a decades-old conflict between India and Bangladesh.

Bangladesh is pushing for the completion of a billion-dollar megaproject and wants a larger share than it currently does.

Since the resignation of Bangladesh’s former prime minister Sheikh Hasina in August, however, relations between Dhaka and New Delhi have been at an all-time low.

So what’s holding up the project? Why does West Bengal, an Indian state, oppose it? And how is China involved?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan

Guests:

Taqbir Huda, a former South Asian regional researcher at Amnesty International and a human rights lawyer from Bangladesh, is a former Amnesty International researcher in South Asia.

Filippo Menga, an associate professor of geography at the Italian university of Bergamo, is

Netanyahu says Israel ‘committed’ to Trump’s Gaza plan

Since Washington’s top diplomat was in Saudi Arabia to push the plan, which Arab states opposed, Netanyahu has declared he is “committed” to the United States’ proposal to occupy the Gaza Strip and relocate its Palestinian residents.

Netanyahu pledged to support US President Trump’s plan to establish a different Gaza in a statement released on Monday.

At the conclusion of the 15-month conflict, which has claimed the lives of more than 48, 000 Palestinians and caused a severe humanitarian crisis, the Israeli leader added that “neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority” would rule the enclave.

Netanyahu’s remarks come a day after he hailed “Trump’s bold vision for Gaza’s future” during a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Jerusalem.

The Trump administration’s attempts to occupy Gaza and forcefully relocate Palestinians are condemned by human rights organizations as violating international law and causing ethnic cleansing.

Arab nations have also criticized the proposal, but it is expected to be on Rubio’s agenda this week during his visits to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman welcomed Rubio on Monday in Riyadh, making it the top US diplomat’s most recent stop in the Middle East.

Saudi Arabia is leading Arab efforts to come up with a plan to stop Hamas from attacking the Gaza Strip that may include a Gulf-led reconstruction fund and a deal.

Any Palestinians who attempt to relocate from their land are deposed by the Saudi Foreign Ministry.

Rubio asserted in a recent interview that the US was still open to alternatives from Arab governments, but that for the time being, “the Trump plan is the only plan.”

Meanwhile, Israel’s security cabinet was expected to discuss the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire on Monday.

There is still not a consensus on the second phase, which will see Hamas release dozens of captives in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting truce, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

Far-right members of the Israeli government, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have said they would quit Netanyahu’s coalition if the war does not resume.

19 Israelis who were held hostage have been freed so far as part of the first stage of the ceasefire agreement, which started on January 19. At this point, 33 captives are expected to be released on staggered intervals.

If all captives aren’t freed, Netanyahu has declared that “the gates of hell will be opened” on Gaza.

Nour Odeh, a journalist from Amman, Jordan, reported on the Israeli premier’s report that relatives and supporters of the prisoners held in Gaza have been protesting for ever.

The Israeli prime minister has been accused of trying to stall negotiations over a ceasefire in Gaza, of trying to avoid phase two, partly because he is attempting to keep his coalition partners content, Odeh said.

The Trump administration’s top officials have also urged the transaction to proceed.

Trump “wants to see” the second stage of the agreement, according to US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff, who stated on Sunday that it is “absolutely going to begin.”

“We are not leaving anybody behind”, he said, referring to the remaining captives.

Meron Rapoport, an editor for Israeli news outlet Local Call, said that while Netanyahu’s government has little desire to move to the second stage of the ceasefire, it is being pressured on two fronts.

Rapoport from Tel Aviv told Al Jazeera that “Netanyahu is seeing in Trump’s plan the fulfillment of the dream to leave Gaza for Palestinians.”

“He is] being pressured by the US and the hostage’s families, who have not yet been released, to enter the second stage at the same time.”

The second stage of the agreement, he added, “would lead to the end of the war” and the possibility of Marwan Barghouti’s release as prominent Palestinian political prisoners.

‘We will last six months’ if Trump pulls US military aid from Ukraine

Kyiv, Ukraine – Ahead of the emergency summit in Paris on Europe’s response to being excluded from US-Russia peace talks, Ukraine’s president warned of his country’s bleak future if US military aid is cut.

In an interview with the NBC news program Meet the Press, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, “We will have a low chance of surviving without the support of the United States.”

Donald Trump, the president of the United States, expressed his willingness to reduce military aid to Ukraine in December.

Zelenskyy rejected a proposed US agreement that would grant Washington access to Ukraine’s rare earth minerals in exchange for continued military support, which could strain relations even more.

The refusal, along with Trump’s recent statements and private calls with both Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, have raised fresh uncertainty about Washington’s long-term support for Kyiv.

Relying on Europe

With US support uncertain, Europe faces mounting pressure to fill the gap.

Zelenskyy raised the issue of Europe developing its “own military” during the Munich Security Conference on February 14 and 16 in response to Trump’s comments and actions.

“Let’s be honest. We can’t rule out the possibility that America might reject Europe on a security-related issue, Zelenskyy said.

Former deputy commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ General Staff, Lieutenant General Ihor Romanenko, stated to Al Jazeera that Ukraine will require more assistance than Europe can provide.

“Europe can’t possibly replace American aid,” he said, adding that Ukraine won’t survive long without US military aid and predicting, “We will last six months. ”

Political turbulence could stymie European support.

Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Slovakia’s PM Robert Fico, both sceptical of military aid to Kyiv, could block EU-wide decisions. Meanwhile, Germany’s far-right AfD party is surging in the polls, further complicating Europe’s ability to act decisively.

Alternative for Germany (AfD) is anti-immigration, anti-European Union, and often pro-Putin. It raises the possibility of forcing Berlin to stop supporting Kyiv and deport Ukrainian refugees.

Ukraine has faced difficulties in increasing its production of weapons and ammunition, despite the possibility of a military aid agreement between Europe and the United States. Russia’s defense sector produced more weapons than NATO, underscoring the need for the EU to revigorate its defense sector for Ukraine.

North Korea has also offered assistance to Russia, with Ukrainian intelligence reporting that thousands of troops have been dispatched by Pyongyang to Russian-held areas. According to South Korea, North Korea has also provided millions of artillery shells to Moscow.

‘It was lousy’

Without US military assistance, Ukraine already had a glimpse of life, according to Romanenko.

A bill passed in April 2024 that would provide for more than $60 billion in desperately needed funding for Ukraine had been delayed for months by Republican hardliners under the influence of former president Donald Trump.

“We’ve already seen what a six-months-long suspension of aid resulted in,” Romanenko said.

According to Romanenko, Ukraine lost a number of strategic strongholds in the southeast Donbass region before the package was approved, losing “thousands of lives.”

During the delay in providing military aid, Bohgan, a military officer stationed in Donbas, claimed that fighting there quickly became much riskier.

“It was lousy, we could fire only five shells a day, while the [expletive] Russians could fire hundreds at us without counting,” said Bohgan, who could not give his last name due to Ukraine Ministry of Defence regulations.

‘Mid-summer or autumn’

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Russia began in February 2022, Washington has so far provided $175 billion in aid to Kyiv through five separate bills that have been approved by the US Congress.

According to researcher at the German University of Bremen, Nicholas Mitrokhin, how quickly Ukraine will use its US-funded military supplies will depend on how quickly its soldiers are forced to use them.

He claimed that Kyiv’s reliance on missiles for the US-made Patriot air defense system is due to constant Russian air raids. Patriot missile costs several million dollars, and they are often spent on expendable targets such as Iranian-made Shahed drones or their Russian-made replicas.

“That’s why my assumption is that the current and upcoming US supplies will definitely last until mid-summer [July], if not until autumn [September], provided they are spent moderately,” Mitrokhin said.

He claimed that Europe cannot make up for the loss of US military supplies, especially when it comes to Patriot missiles, light-armed vehicles, and 155mm shells used to thwart Russian infantry.

According to Mitrokhin, how long before Russia-US ties start to deteriorate and whether Ukraine would need to survive without US military assistance would be a factor.

“Trump’s and Putin’s relationship will turn sour, and we will soon see a decisive increase in US supplies,” he told Al Jazeera.

Russians and Americans dressed up as fashion designers.

Kyiv-based analyst Alexey Kushch said that Zelenskyy was right to decline Trump’s deal that tied military aid to Ukraine’s mineral resources.

If Washington writes off half of the debt and schedules the remainder to be paid back by the end of the century, he told Al Jazeera, the US should treat Ukraine like an ally and that it would be fair.

No one questioned whether the USSR should make up for the military aid by dispensing with its natural resources, according to Kushch, referring to the billions of dollars in military equipment that Russia purchased in the 1990s from Washington.

“Why should Ukraine, an ally, do it? ” Kushch asked Al Jazeera.

Some Ukrainians are upset about the most recent developments, regardless of whether the US stops providing military aid.

“As usual, somebody else will decide our fate,” Vsevolod Boyko, a retired school principal whose son Ihor is fighting in Donbas despite two wounds, told Al Jazeera.

Which countries are the top military spenders and where does Europe rank?

In Paris, European leaders are gathered for an urgent summit to discuss how to respond to President Donald Trump’s decision to discuss ending the Ukrainian conflict without European involvement.

Monday’s meeting in the French capital follows the Munich Security Conference, which ended on Sunday, where US Vice President JD Vance reiterated Trump’s stance that Europe must increase its defence spending.

In January, Trump called on NATO’s European members to allocate 5 percent of their gross national products (GDPs) to defence. Member states have also been urged to increase their defense spending by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

How much is global military spending?

Global military spending hit $2.44 trillion in 2023, or $306 per person, marking a 6.8 percent increase from the previous year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). This was the largest year-on-year rise since 2009.

By comparison, in 2000, global military expenditures were $798bn, or $130 per capita – less than a third of the amount spent today.

Total military spending is the total money that nations spend on their respective militaries and related activities. This includes costs for soldiers, operations, weapons, equipment, research and military infrastructure.

Which countries spend the most on their militaries?

The US spends the most money on military, making it the world’s largest military spender. In 2023, it paid out $880bn –&nbsp, more than the next eight countries combined, according to SIPRI.

China is the second highest spender with $309bn, followed by Russia at $126bn, India at $83bn and Saudi Arabia at $74bn.

The countries’ total military expenditures are listed in the table below, along with their per capita expenditures and spending as a proportion of their GDPs and government budgets. To sort the table, click on the columns to the left.

Which countries invest the most of their GDP in their militaries?

Due to its ongoing war with Russia, Ukraine allocated $62bn to its military in 2023, the highest share of GDP at 36.7 percent.

Lebanon ranked second, spending 8.9 percent of its GDP, followed by Algeria at 8.2 percent, Saudi Arabia at 7.1 percent and South Sudan at 6.3 percent.

What percentage of NATO members’ money is spent?

NATO, established in 1949 by 12 founding member states, is the world’s most powerful military alliance. Its original goal was to promote political cohesion in Europe and halt Soviet expansion.

Over the past 75 years, its membership has grown to 32 members with Finland and Sweden becoming the latest countries to join in 2023 and 2024, respectively.

(Al Jazeera)

To ensure the alliance’s military readiness, the defense ministers agreed in 2006 to allocate at least 2% of their GDPs to defense spending.

Currently, two-thirds of its members (23 of 32) have fulfilled this commitment, raising the money spent on defence by all NATO members to $1.47 trillion in 2024. This is an improvement over the 2014 commitment of only 10 nations that met the 2 percent guideline in 2023 and three that met the commitment in 2014.

Pope’s hospitalisation extended to treat ‘complex’ condition, Vatican says

Pope Francis’s respiratory tract infection has presented a “complex clinical picture” requiring further hospitalisation, the Vatican says.

According to Matteo Bruni, a spokesman for the Vatican, the pope is suffering from a “polymicrobial respiratory tract infection” that has necessitated a change in his medication regimen.

There was no timeframe given for his hospitalisation, which has already sidelined Francis for longer than a 2023 hospitalisation for pneumonia.

Bruni claimed the pope was “in good spirits” and that the complexity of his symptoms “will require an appropriate hospital stay.”

Concerns about the 88-year-old pontiff’s health have increased since his admission to Gemelli Hospital in Rome, Italy, on Friday after a weeklong bout of bronchitis worsened.

Some activities related to the Vatican’s Jubilee Holy Year have already been forced to be canceled as a result of Pope Francis’ hospitalization, which also raises questions.

The pope’s scheduled weekly meeting in St. Peter’s Square on Wednesday was postponed, according to the Vatican because he remained hospitalized.

Prior to the pope’s doctors’ earlier order, Francis had to take the pope’s usual weekly prayer to pilgrims in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday and perform a Mass for artists to celebrate the Catholic Church’s jubilee year.

Pilgrims who were in the Vatican on Monday expressed optimism about the pope’s recovery.

“We certainly wish for him to get better very quickly”, said Reverend Tyler Carter, a Catholic priest from the United States.

“He is our father and our shepherd, and so we want his continued health and blessing”.

Manuel Rossi, a tourist from the Italian city of Milan, said he was “quite worried” when the pope cancelled his appearance on Sunday.

“I am 18 years old, so I have seen a few popes in my life and am very close to him”, Rossi said.

“I hope he recovers as soon as possible”.

After battling a pulmonary infection as a young man, Francis had one lung removed.

Despite having a more fragile health, the Argentinian pope is a well-known workaholic.