South African humanitarian in pro-Israeli crosshairs over Palestine support

Johannesburg, South Africa — The crowd erupted in thunderous applause as Dr Imtiaz Sooliman ascended the stage, dressed in his signature dark green T-shirt emblazoned with South Africa’s flag and the name of his organisation, Gift of the Givers.

The humanitarian had been invited to Cape Town’s Sea Point promenade in October for a rally in support of Palestine, to give protesters enraged about Israel’s genocide in Gaza an update on his aid agency’s work in the war-torn enclave.

He quickly got fired up, sharing how his team in Gaza had lost family members during the Israeli assault and how the fight for justice for Palestinians has been a 75-year struggle.

“Every time we protested, the Zionists were too clever; they were arrogant, acted with impunity. They put fear in corporations, in universities … in government,” he said, adding that they lobbed accusations of anti-Semitism in response to any criticism of Israel. “Well, I’ve got a new message for them: find a new narrative. That is dull, boring and stupid,” he added.

The large crowd erupted into more cheers and applause.

Sooliman, a trained medical doctor who has opted not to practise any more, is a natural at firing up large crowds, his passion for justice and humanitarianism evident.

Behind closed doors, the 62-year-old is focused and meticulous – starting his days early, and engaging in every step of the work his organisation is involved in, even drafting social media posts for his teams to share.

Three decades ago, he founded Gift of the Givers after a spiritual trip to Turkiye inspired him to give back. The foundation has since grown to become South Africa’s most prominent aid agency, responding to crises both locally and abroad.

Despite the organisation’s footprint and wide range of accolades, Sooliman has found himself in Zionist crosshairs for criticising Israel’s actions in Gaza since the war began in October 2023.

A medic from Gift of the Givers treats a Palestinian child [Courtesy of Gift of the Givers]

But to Sooliman, his philosophy is straightforward: human need transcends political affiliation.

“I don’t mince my words. Because I don’t look at conflicts from a political point of view. I look at it from the humanitarian point of view,” the outspoken doctor told Al Jazeera from his home in Pietermaritzburg in South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province.

Gift of the Givers

The Gift of the Givers Foundation started in Pietermaritzburg in 1992, soon extending its work across the country, the continent and further afield. The organisation now employs 600 people, with offices in nine countries, including Somalia, Yemen and Palestine.

According to records, Gift of the Givers has distributed 6 billion South African rand ($319m) in aid across 47 countries in 32 years. The organisation is widely funded by big South African corporations and small private donors, it said.

While the NGO responds to catastrophic disasters – including tsunamis, earthquakes and war – at home it still addresses myriad smaller crises plaguing local communities, often stepping in when government cannot.

Recently, in South Africa’s arid Karoo region, Sooliman and his team were immersed in preparations for the inauguration of a containerised kitchen in Touws River, a small railway town where the vast majority of the 8,000 residents grapple with life below the poverty line.

Sooliman spoke to Al Jazeera while handling logistics and drafting a press release for the event in anticipation of the launch of a feeding centre desperately needed in the community.

Most Touws River residents survive on paltry government grants, and eight out of 10 people are unemployed. Every day, hundreds of children queue to have what is often their only hot meal.

In the midst of that, fires also ravaged the Western Cape province, prompting another urgent call for intervention by Gift of the Givers. Meanwhile, warm meals were being prepared and distributed to people stuck at the South African border with Mozambique amid persisting post-election violence.

At the same time in Syria, teams were preparing to open a refuge centre for women and children while others distributed food to the poor in the days after the collapse of the Bashar al-Assad regime.

Gift of the Givers
Gift of the Givers distributes food at a site for displaced people in Syria [Courtesy of Gift of the Givers]

Accusations and support

Sooliman’s life is a whirlwind of crises, and the practical work takes centre stage. But he does not shy away from calling out injustices where he sees them.

His organisation has worked to help people in the occupied Palestinian territory for decades. But when Israel bombed the  al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza in the early days of the war, he publicly called out the Israeli government’s actions in a series of media interviews in South Africa.

He also called the situation in Gaza in the first weeks of the war “bloody dangerous” and “the worst situation in the world because there is no exit”.

“I went berserk,” he told Al Jazeera.

He was prepared for a backlash. The onslaught he soon faced from local pro-Israeli groups involved accusations — with no supporting evidence — that he was funding “terror groups” and harbouring an “Islamist agenda”. Sooliman has rubbished those claims.

His detractors sought to have banks clamp down on Gift of the Givers and investigate their funding amid an apparent campaign on social media to discredit him.

Lawrence Nowosenetz, a former member of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, a local Zionist lobby group, petitioned the NGO Helen Suzman Foundation, whose patron was Jewish, to prevent Sooliman from delivering an annual lecture last year.

“The likelihood that donor funding in Gaza was used exclusively to provide humanitarian relief for innocent civilians is remote,” Nowosenetz wrote, claiming without evidence that it is “likely” some Gift of the Givers resources went into supporting Hamas.

Op-ed pieces in The Times of Israel accused Sooliman of nefarious links to Iran, which he has denied. Well-known, right-leaning South African musician David “The Kifness” Scott claimed on X that Sooliman was “a radical Islamist under the guise of a humanitarian” — again, without evidence.

Gift of the Givers founder, Imtiaz Sooliman
Imtiaz Sooliman has faced a backlash from pro-Israel voices over his humanitarian support of Palestine [Courtesy of Gift of the Givers]

The allegations did not stick and backfired with an avalanche of support for Sooliman, with government ministers, religious leaders, activists and business leaders expressing support for the work Gift of the Givers does. The Helen Suzman Foundation stood by its decision to have Sooliman deliver its annual memorial lecture, which he did in November.

Everyday people also took to social media to push back against Sooliman’s critics.

“Those people are forever helping out. When the farmers were suffering a drought, white Afrikaans Christian farmers … these Gift of the Givers people were sorting them out with water,” a white Afrikaner man, who identifies as TheUprightMan on TikTok, said, defending Gift of the Givers amid a flurry of racist comments.

“When the hurricane struck in KZN, it was them. Whenever there are people in need, these people from Gift of the Givers pitch up and they offer their services to anyone. Not just Muslim people,” he told his 18,000 followers on TikTok. KZN is an abbreviation of KwaZulu-Natal, the second most populous province in South Africa.

Disinformation campaign

The crusade against Sooliman has since gone quiet. But veteran South African journalist Ferial Haffajee, commenting on the campaign, said she had observed a troubling trend since South Africa took a stand against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ): many prominent South Africans have faced vicious attacks.

“Many people who did that experienced hardship, disinformation campaigns, and even the loss of their jobs. In that context, there has been an effort to besmirch the name of Dr Imtiaz Sooliman,” she said, adding that “they picked on the wrong guy. He is a complete local hero and a global icon. ”

Sooliman said he believes the campaign to discredit him was an effort to send a chilling message to anyone who opposed the Israeli government and its supporters.

“If they could take on the biggest organisation in South Africa that has the most respect and break you down, it sends a message to other people to not stand against them. It was to send a message to other people. It was to block my funding,” he said.

He was hardly bothered by the noise, confidently saying he knew that “they would fail”.

Sooliman also noted that, ironically, while the campaign against him tried to make false links between him and Hamas, during his years of work in Palestine, he butted heads with the Gaza group as well.

On an initial visit to Palestine in 2002, Sooliman said he may have upset the Hamas leadership when he called for Palestinian unity if ever the country were to achieve liberation the way South Africa did from apartheid.

“I don’t think they were too happy with me,” he told Al Jazeera.

At the time, he was on an aid mission delivering medical supplies to the occupied West Bank and meeting Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. It took his organisation 12 weeks to circumvent Israeli government obstructions and for the aid to be delivered.

He remembers also upsetting other regional groups.

Once, he referred to the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah as “Hebushaitain” (the group of Satan) after they targeted a hospital Gift of the Givers was working in in northern Syria, while also contending with the Free Syrian Army there during the country’s civil war.

In Somalia, during an aid trip in the early 2000s, Sooliman told the armed group al-Shabab, which was curious about his activities in the area, that he was not there to take political sides but to help the victims of the conflict. “They let us do our work,” he said.

Armed groups have allowed the work of Gift of the Givers to continue on the understanding that “we are not here to choose sides”, he said, calling his neutral and impartial approach his “recipe for success” on the work front.

‘Sincerity’ and solidarity

Meanwhile, on the personal front, Sooliman hardly takes holidays and remains intimately involved in every aspect of his organisation’s work, regardless of scale.

“Whatever we do, we supervise it fully. I get involved. Most of my time goes to looking after projects. I know no other life. I have been doing this for 32 years,” he said.

Sooliman had more than 200 public engagements scheduled for 2024 – toggling between projects, public events, protest rallies, corporate events, fundraising and official government functions.

“My daughter says I live on a plane,” he joked.

He recalled that on the day of her wedding in December 2010, he had to rush away from the festivities to urgently respond to floods in Soweto, south of Johannesburg.

“My house was full of guests, I had to get back to work. ”

Each time his family persuades him to take a well-deserved break, a national disaster seems to erupt, thwarting his plans. “Disaster business is 365 days a year,” he joked.

Gift of the Givers
A doctor working with Gift of the Givers treats a young child [Courtesy of Gift of the Givers]

His efforts have fostered support from diverse religious and cultural groups, as well as civil society, journalists and the public.

“There’s a lot of sincerity behind his actions. This sincerity touches the hearts of people. It attracts support and fosters love,” Azhar Vadi, the head of Johannesburg-based nonprofit Salaam Foundation, another player in the local aid sector, said of Sooliman.

For journalist Haffejee, Gift of the Givers’ solidarity “spans east to west, north to south”. The organisation “is my marker of what is good in the world and in this country”, she said.

Since Sooliman’s first aid trip to Palestine in 2002, his group has steadily increased its outreaches there. In 2009, Gift of the Givers responded to calls for medical assistance after Israel targeted besieged Gaza for three weeks. Sooliman led an aid mission at the time, and again when the 2014 war in Gaza happened.

Since the genocide began in 2023, he has offered assistance, including facilitating $250,000 in medical equipment to Gaza, which was sponsored by Aspen South Africa, and working to upgrade the al-Shifa Hospital; setting up bakeries and helping with desalination plants. The foundation also helps Palestinian refugee families now in Egypt, and supports medical students completing their studies in South Africa.

At the same time, Sooliman has spoken out for Palestinian justice, including doubling down on calls for the war to end and urging Israel to release the head of the Kamal Adwan Hospital, Dr Hussam Abu Safia.

Despite concerns that the organisation’s other work may get affected by his outspoken stance on Palestine, Sooliman is determined not to back down – and says it is an approach that has maybe even helped them.

“People were calling, saying ‘What about corporate funding? ’. I said, ‘What about corporates? God funds the corporates; he can take it away whenever he wants. ’

Fact check: Was Trump truthful in his inauguration day speeches?

President Donald Trump took his second oath of office on January 20 as the 47th president of the United States, offering an agenda heavily foreshadowed by his campaign promises.

Speaking from inside the US Capitol Rotunda because of the subfreezing temperatures, Trump said, “The golden age of America begins right now. ”

He promised to crack down on undocumented immigration, increase domestic oil drilling, impose tariffs, rescind federal electric vehicle goals, declare that there are only two genders assigned at birth, rename Alaska’s Mount Denali back to Mount McKinley and end diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

“All of this will change starting today,”  he said, “and it will change very quickly. ”

Appearing in the Capitol’s Emancipation Hall shortly after his inaugural address, Trump jabbed at familiar rivals, including the “unselect committee of political thugs” — a reference to the House committee that investigated the January 6, 2021, assault on the US Capitol and received last-minute preemptive pardons from President Joe Biden. Trump chastised two members of that committee, calling former Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney a “crying lunatic” and saying former Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger was “always crying. ”

Here are our fact checks of Trump’s claims during his inaugural speech followed by claims during his subsequent remarks at Emancipation Hall.

Do tariffs ‘enrich’ the country levying them?

Arguing for his plan to enact tariffs, Trump said, “Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens. ”

However, most economists disagree that tariffs will “enrich” Americans, and real-world examples of tariffs working that way are rare. Consumers in tariff-levying countries often suffer in these deals because prices rise, they said.

“Tariffs artificially raise the cost of doing business, which depresses overall economic production in the form of lower gross domestic product, artificially higher prices and fewer goods sold,” Boise State University political scientist Ross Burkhart, who studies trade policy, told PolitiFact in August. “For the consumer, this means a reduction in purchasing power. ”

Tariffs also mean that producers pay more as prices rise for materials used to make products domestically. US producers can expect retaliatory tariffs, which can also raise prices for US consumers. Also, a decline in international competition hurts consumers by letting the remaining producers raise prices.

Was there ever a Green New Deal ‘mandate’?

Trump misled when he said, “With my actions today, we will end the Green New Deal, and we will revoke the electric vehicle mandate. ”

No “Green New Deal” is in effect. Senator Edward Markey and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, both Democrats, introduced a 2019 resolution that offered a broad vision for responding to climate change, but it never became law. After Biden became president, Congress passed legislation, including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, that advanced some climate policy goals. Trump cannot undo laws by executive order.

In 2024, Biden’s administration, building on a target set in its first year, issued a rule that 56 percent of all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the US to be electric or hybrids by 2032.

Was there ‘record inflation’ under Biden?

Trump said, “Next, I will direct all members of my Cabinet to marshal the vast powers at their disposal to defeat what was record inflation and rapidly bring down costs and prices. ”

The highest year-over-year inflation rate on Biden’s watch was about 9 percent in summer 2022. That was the highest in about 40 years.

The highest sustained, year-over-year US inflation rates were recorded in the 1970s and early 1980s, when the price increase sometimes ranged from 12 percent to 15 percent. For one year — 1946, after the US won World War II — the overall year-over-year inflation rate exceeded 18 percent.

Are countries sending  migrants from prisons, mental institutions?

Trump repeated the campaign claim that people “from prisons and mental institutions … illegally entered our country from all over the world”.

However, there is no evidence that countries are emptying their prisons, or that mental institutions are sending people to illegally migrate to the US.

Immigration officials arrested about 108,000 noncitizens with criminal convictions (whether in the US or abroad) from fiscal years 2021 to 2024, federal data shows. That accounts for people stopped at and between ports of entry; not everyone was let in.

Does China control the Panama Canal?

Trump, who repeated his goal of taking back control of the Panama Canal, misled about the canal’s operations.

“And above all, China is operating the Panama Canal,” Trump said.

That’s false.

The Republic of Panama has owned and administered the Panama Canal since December 31, 1999, when Panama took over its full operation.

The Panama Canal Authority, an autonomous government entity governed by an  11-member board of directors, manages the waterway.

China does have influence in the canal. The Panama Ports Company — a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports — manages the Balboa and Cristobal ports that serve as the entry and exit ways to the canal. However, ultimate authority over the ports and canal is maintained by the  Panama Canal Authority, a part of the Panamanian government.

How many people died building the Panama Canal?

Trump claimed that US “lost 38,000 lives” during its construction.

That is higher than the official death toll. It’s possible that Trump added up numbers from efforts over decades to build the canal, including by the French starting in 1881.

“Over the span of more than three decades, at least 25,000 workers died in the construction of the Panama Canal,”  author Christopher Klein wrote in a  2023 History. com article.

We found similar numbers posted in  other  articles about the death toll recorded by the US and the death toll for the French.

Did apple prices double under Biden?

In his second speech of the day, at Emancipation Hall, Trump, among other things, claimed apple prices had doubled under Biden.

“How many times can you say that an apple has doubled in cost,” Trump said. “I’d say it and I hit it hard. ”

Even at their peak in prices, apples did not cost twice what they did when Biden took office in January 2021.

Apple prices today are almost the same as they were at the beginning and the end of Biden’s tenure,  producer price index  data shows. (This statistic is an index pegged to 100, not a measurement in dollars and cents. )

During Biden’s presidency, apple prices did rise, along with the prices of many groceries  and other consumer products. But even at their short-lived peak, in February 2023, apple prices were about 1. 4 times higher than when Biden took office, not twice as much.

Did Biden pardon 33 murderers?

Alluding to former President Biden, Trump said that “they pardoned” 33 murderers.

Two days before Christmas 2024, Biden  said he was commuting – not pardoning – the sentences of 37 of the 40 people who faced federal death sentences for such crimes as killing police officers and military service members, killing people in bank robberies or killing guards or prisoners in federal prisons.

By commuting their sentences, they will spend life in prison rather than face the death penalty. Commutation is not the same as a pardon. A  commutation  of a sentence reduces the sentence but does not erase the conviction. A pardon is the president’s forgiveness.

“Make no mistake: I condemn these murderers, grieve for the victims of their despicable acts, and ache for all the families who have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss,” Biden said in a December 23, 2024, statement. But he added, “I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level. ”

Trump grants clemency to all charged over January 6 US Capitol attack

United States President Donald Trump has granted clemency to everyone charged over the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol in one of his first official acts in the Oval Office.

In a sweeping reversal of the years-long drive to punish those responsible for trying to overturn the outcome of the 2020 US election, Trump on Monday pardoned about 1,500 of his supporters and commuted the sentences of 14 others.

“This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation,” Trump said in a proclamation posted on the White House website.

Trump’s pardons wiped the slate clean for many of those convicted of committing the most serious crimes on January 6, including Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the far-right Proud Boys, who was sentenced to 22 years in prison for seditious conspiracy.

The pardons also erased the criminal records of more than 700 people convicted of misdemeanour offences, such as trespassing, and put a halt to hundreds of pending prosecutions.

Among the most high-profile figures to have their sentences commuted was Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the far-right Oath Keepers, who was sentenced to 18 years in prison for seditious conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding and tampering with documents and proceedings.

Asked if those who assaulted police should be punished, Trump said they had been in prison for a “long time already”.

“I see murderers in this country get two years, one year and maybe no time. So they’ve already been in jail for a long time. These people have been destroyed,” Trump said, describing their treatment as “outrageous”.

While Trump pledged to pardon many of the January 6 defendants during his re-election campaign, it had been unclear how far he would go to extend clemency to those who participated in the attack.

In an interview with Fox News last week, Vice President JD Vance said only those who had protested “peacefully” on January 6 should receive pardons.

“If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned,” Vance said. “And there’s a little bit of a grey area there. ”

Trump’s act of clemency drew swift condemnation from Democrats and other critics of the president.

“The President’s actions are an outrageous insult to our justice system and the heroes who suffered physical scars and emotional trauma as they protected the Capitol, the Congress and the Constitution,” former Democratic House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a post on X.

“It is shameful that the President has decided to make one of his top priorities the abandonment and betrayal of police officers who put their lives on the line to stop an attempt to subvert the peaceful transfer of power. ”

A total of 1,583 people were charged over the events of January 6, when a mob of Trump supporters attempted to block a joint session of the US Congress from certifying US President Joe Biden’s election victory.

Rioters injured more than 140 police officers and inflicted economic losses of about $2. 8m, according to US prosecutors.

More than 1,200 people were convicted of offences, including about 250 people convicted of assault.

Of the total, more than 700 people were sentenced to prison time.

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events – day 1,062

Here is the situation on Tuesday, January 21:

Fighting

  • Ukraine’s Air Force claimed it shot down 93 of 141 drones Russia launched in attacks overnight. The Air Force also said that 47 of the drones were “lost” while two returned to Russia.
  • Russia said it destroyed 31 Ukrainian drones which had primarily targeted industrial sites in Russia’s Tatarstan region, located about 1,000km (about 600 miles) from the Ukrainian border. No victims or damage have been reported.
  • The governor of Russia’s Bryansk region, Alexander Bogomaz, said 14 Ukrainian drones were neutralised in the region, which borders Ukraine. He claimed Kyiv also fired four United States-made HIMARS missiles at targets in Bryansk.
  • Authorities in Moscow launched an investigation after video footage emerged that showed a military policeman beating Russian soldiers bound for Ukraine with a baton and using stun guns on them. The perpetrators of the violence have been identified and an investigation is under way, authorities said.
  • Russia’s Ministry of Defence said its troops have captured two villages, Shevchenko and Novoiehorivka, in eastern Ukraine. Shevchenko lies a few kilometres from Pokrovsk, a key supply hub for Kyiv’s troops.
  • Russia has levelled terrorism charges against United Kingdom national James Scott Rhys Anderson, 22, who was captured while fighting with Ukrainian forces in Russia’s Kursk region. Accused of acting as a “mercenary”, Anderson faces up to 35 years in a Russian prison.
  • Kyiv reportedly attacked a Russian-occupied town in Ukraine’s south Kherson, killing two people and injuring more than a dozen others, according to reports. The region’s Russian-installed governor, Vladimir Saldo, accused Ukraine of firing “cluster munitions ” near a school and said children were among those wounded.
  • Ukraine’s State Investigation Bureau detained two generals and a colonel for alleged “inaction” and failing to defend against a Russian offensive that allowed parts of eastern Kharkiv to be captured in 2024.
  • A wounded North Korean soldier captured by Ukraine told interrogators on camera that Pyongyang’s forces fighting for Moscow are suffering major losses. Although Moscow has not acknowledged the deployment of North Korean soldiers to fight in the Kursk region on behalf of Russia, the soldier gave a detailed account of the troops ‘ arrival, training and work routines.

Politics & Diplomacy

  • Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy congratulated Donald Trump on his inauguration as US president.
  • Zelenskyy said Trump’s return to the White House was an “opportunity” for “just peace” in Ukraine.
  • Putin said he was “open to dialogue” with Ukraine under Donald Trump’s administration. He also said any settlement should ensure “lasting peace based on respect for the legitimate interest of all people”.
  • French President Emmanuel Macron warned that Russia’s war on Ukraine would not end “tomorrow or the day after” in response to Trump’s pledge to end the war quickly.

Russian Gas & Oil

  • Transnistria’s leader Vadim Krasnoselsky said the separatist enclave was ready to buy gas from Moldova. He said they sent a letter to Moldovagaz on Saturday but had yet to receive a response.
  • The Finnish Border Guard said Russia’s oil shipments via the Baltic Sea have dropped by roughly 10 percent in the past four months due to European Union sanctions on Russian oil and gas exports.
Firefighters work at the site of a damaged metro station after a Russian missile attack in Kyiv, Ukraine, on January 18, 2025[Efrem Lukatsky/AP Photo]

Humanitarian Support

  • The Ukrainian government announced plans to ramp up efforts to encourage refugees in Germany to return home, including setting up “unity hubs” in Berlin and other locations later to assist with jobs, housing and educational opportunities. Ukrainian Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov said a significant number of Ukrainians were “seriously considering” returning home.

Musk accused of giving Nazi salute during Trump inauguration celebrations

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has come under fire after making back-to-back hand gestures resembling the Nazi salute during a speech celebrating the presidential inauguration of Donald Trump.

Addressing Trump supporters hours after the Republican was inaugurated as the 47th US president on Monday, Musk hailed the outcome of the US presidential election on November 4 as “no ordinary victory”.

“This was a fork in the road of human civilization,” Musk said at the Capital One Arena in Washington, DC.

“This one really mattered. Thank you for making it happen! Thank you. ”

Musk then thumped his right hand into his chest before extending his arm in an upward angle with his palm down and fingers together.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, who has been tasked with leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency in Trump’s administration, then turned around to face the crowd behind him and repeated the gesture.

Musk’s actions drew immediate scrutiny online, with some social media users accusing him of giving the infamous Sieg Heil salute associated with Adolf Hitler.

“This honestly could not look more like a Nazi salute,” British journalist and commentator Owen Jones said in a post on X.

The gesture also drew scrutiny in Israeli media, with the newspaper Haaretz saying Musk appeared to conclude his remarks with a “‘Roman salute,’ a fascist salute most commonly associated with Nazi Germany”.

Others defended Musk, including The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), one of the most prominent organisations dedicated to opposing anti-Semitism, which said the billionaire had made an “awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute”.

“In this moment, all sides should give one another a bit of grace, perhaps even the benefit of the doubt, and take a breath,” the ADL said in a post on X.

“This is a new beginning. Let’s hope for healing and work toward unity in the months and years ahead. ”

Al Jazeera did not immediately receive a response to requests for comment sent to Musk’s lawyer and a number of his companies.

Musk’s politics have shifted sharply right since he publicly came out in support of Trump after the Republican narrowly survived an attempted assassination in July.

Earlier this month, the billionaire hosted Alice Weidel, the leader of Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany, for a conversation on his social media platform X after endorsing her party in February’s national elections.

4,000 COVID-19 Survivors to Donate Plasma for Research on Cure

According to Shincheonji Church of Jesus, a South Korea-based religious group, over 4,000 members of the church who recovered from COVID-19 are willing to donate plasma for developing a new treatment.

Mr. Man Hee Lee, founder of the Shincheonji Church, said that members of the church are advised to donate plasma voluntarily. “As Jesus sacrificed himself with his blood for life, we hope that the blood of people can bring positive effects on overcoming the current situation,” said Mr. Lee.

Read More