Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

US frees jailed Russian cybercriminal as Trump builds bridges with Moscow

A Russian cybercrime boss has been freed from prison in the United States after Moscow released American teacher Marc Fogel, reciprocal releases that come as US President Donald Trump seeks to build bridges with Russia and end the war in Ukraine.

Alexander Vinnik, a Russian cryptocurrency hacker and money launderer, was in northern California on Wednesday awaiting transportation back to Russia, the Reuters news agency reports, citing anonymous Trump administration officials.

Vinnik was required to forfeit more than $100m to the US government before being repatriated, one official said.

Arrested in Greece in 2017 on money laundering charges, Vinnik was extradited to the US in 2022. He pleaded guilty in May 2024 to conspiracy to commit money laundering after funnelling $4bn in proceeds from ransomware attacks, identity theft, drug rings and other criminal activity through his cryptocurrency exchange, BTC-e.

US teacher Fogel, who was released from prison by Russia on Tuesday, was serving a 14-year sentence for drug smuggling after being caught at a Moscow airport with a small amount of medical marijuana in 2021.

The 63-year-old flew to Washington the same day, where he celebrated his release with Trump at the White House.

US national security adviser, Mike Waltz, said Fogel’s release “serves as a show of good faith from the Russians and a sign we are moving in the right direction to end the brutal and terrible war in Ukraine”.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the exchange of prisoners had helped rebuild trust between Washington and Moscow, but dampened suggestions it could lead to a breakthrough in Ukraine.

“Of course, such agreements are hardly capable of becoming a breakthrough moment, but at the same time, bit by bit, these are steps to build mutual trust, which is now at its lowest point,” Peskov said.

In a separate deal announced on Wednesday, the White House confirmed it had also secured the release of another US citizen who was serving jail time in Belarus, a close Russian ally.

The White House, which did not name the detainee, heralded the release as a “remarkable victory” for the Trump administration and a testament to the president’s “dealmaking ability”.

“President Trump’s strong leadership has led to the release of an American unjustly detained in Belarus and two political prisoners,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.

“We remain committed to the release of other US citizens in Belarus and elsewhere,” he added.

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, a US government-funded media outlet, named one of those released from prison in the Belarusian capital Vilnius as Andrey Kuznechyk, who was arrested by authorities in November 2021 and is a journalist with the network’s Belarus service.

In a press statement, the White House said the release was the 11th of a US citizen jailed abroad since Trump took office late last month.

The release of prisoners is part of a wider diplomatic push by the White House to restore ties with Moscow and end the war in Ukraine – which Trump had pledged to do “within 24 hours” after taking the oath during his presidential campaign.

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events – day 1,085

Here is the situation on Thursday, February 13:

Fighting

  • At least one person was killed and four others, including a nine-year-old child, were injured by a Russian missile strike in Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, the city’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko, said. The strike caused damage and fires in at least four areas of the city.
  • Regional Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said a woman was killed by a Ukrainian drone in Russia’s Belgorod region. Gladkov said the drone struck the victim’s car and killed her instantly.
  • Ukraine’s military said it shot down six out of seven ballistic missiles launched by Russia in an overnight attack. The Kremlin also launched a barrage of 123 attack drones at Kyiv, out of which 71 were shot down and 40 were likely deterred by “electronic countermeasures”, the military said.
  • Ukraine launched a drone attack on Enerhodar city near the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, hitting a car parked about 300 metres (0.2 miles) from one of the plant’s reactors, the Russian-installed regional governor for the occupied Zaporizhia region, Yevgeny Balitsky, said.
Residents leave from a site of apartment buildings hit by a Russian air strike in Kherson, Ukraine, on February 2, 2025 [Ivan Antypenko/Reuters]
  • Ukraine’s security service (SBU) said the chief of staff of its anti-terrorist department was arrested for allegedly spying for Russia. The agency said they discovered 14 episodes of the unnamed official’s illegal activities.

Politics & Diplomacy

  • United States President Donald Trump said another US citizen would be freed after Marc Fogel was released from a Russian jail where he had been held since 2021.
  • Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said a Russian prisoner was freed from a US prison in exchange for Fogel’s release and that he would return home in the coming days. A White House official confirmed that the individual was Russian cryptocurrency kingpin Alexander Vinnik.
  • Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev branded Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s offer to swap Russian territories occupied by Ukraine for Ukrainian land held by Russia as “nonsense”, adding that Russia would never discuss trading the territory it holds.
  • Zelenskyy also said that Russia’s recent missile attack on Kyiv was proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin was not interested in peace and called for “strong steps and pressure” to stop the attacks.
  • Ukraine’s Defence Minister Rustem Umerov confirmed that he had held his first meeting with the new US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
  • Kyiv and Moscow once again traded blame for the failed International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) mission rotation at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.
  • The United Kingdom pledged 150 million pounds ($186.6m) in military aid to Ukraine that includes drones, tanks and air defence systems.
  • US Defense Secretary Hegseth said at a NATO meeting in Brussels that the aim to win back Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders from Russia was an unrealistic objective. He also said the US did not consider Ukraine’s membership of NATO to be a part of a possible peace plan between Russia and Ukraine.
  • Trump said he spoke on the phone with Putin and agreed to start negotiations immediately to end the war in Ukraine. Trump said he informed Zelenskyy of the conversation.
  • Russia also confirmed that a call had taken place between the two presidents and detailed that Putin and Trump spoke for nearly an hour and the two presidents had agreed to meet.
  • Trump later said that he planned to meet with Putin in Saudi Arabia to further discuss a peace deal. He added that it would happen “in the not-too-distant future” and that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman would also be involved.
  • Trump spoke with Zelenskyy on the phone for nearly an hour, the Ukrainian president’s office said. Following the call, Trump said Zelenskyy “wants peace”.

As Modi meets Trump, can he get India tariff waivers, Iran respite?

New Delhi, India Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Washington late on Wednesday night and is scheduled to meet United States President Donald Trump on Thursday at the White House.

While the two leaders have often described each other as friends in the past, and have even held joint political rallies together, Modi’s visit comes at a time when the relationship is being tested by Trump’s tariff threats and deportation realities.

“I look forward to meeting my friend, President Trump,” Modi said in a departing message, adding that he has a “very warm recollection of working together in [Trump’s] first term”.

Trump had announced Modi’s visit to the US after their telephone conversation on January 27, a week after he was sworn into office for his second term. After their call, Trump also said that he believed Modi would do “what is right” on undocumented Indian migrants in the US.

But pleasing both Trump and the Indian public won’t be easy for Modi.

Here’s what’s at stake for India, and what Modi might bring with him to the meeting with Trump to try to placate the US president.

What’s at stake for India?

The US is India’s largest export destination and ranks among its top two trade partners in several sectors, including technology, trade, defence and energy. The two-way trade between the US and India touched an all-time high of $118bn in 2023-24.

Bilateral ties have also strengthened in the last three decades as the US has increasingly focused on countering the rise of a shared rival – China.

But despite that convergence, Trump has made clear – as he had with several US allies – that he has deep differences too with India.

During his campaign for the 2024 election, Trump labelled India a “very big abuser” of trade and threatened tariffs. Since being elected, he pushed New Delhi to buy more US-made security equipment as a way to reduce the imbalance in their trade. In 2024, the trade surplus stood at $45.6bn, in favour of India, according to US government data.

Trump’s re-election campaign also highlighted undocumented immigration and illegal settlement in the US. As of 2022, India ranked third, after Mexico and El Salvador, among countries with the largest number of undocumented immigrants – 725,000 – living in the country.

And on Wednesday last week, a US military plane touched down in Amritsar, a city in northern India, carrying 104 Indian deportees, their hands and legs cuffed. In the farthest such journey undertaken by a US military aircraft, the “mistreatment” of deportees prompted a major outrage, including protests by the opposition, in India.

“India has always celebrated the success of Indians in the US, which means Indian Americans have been a very visible community in India’s consciousness,” said Swaran Singh, professor at the centre of international politics at Delhi’s prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University. Indian foreign policy too, under Modi, has especially celebrated nonresident Indians, he said. “These dynamics make the mistreatment of Indian deportees a volatile and inflammable issue in bilateral ties,” Singh said.

Jon Danilowicz, a retired diplomat who served at the US Department of State, said that Modi’s meeting with Trump “is mainly an opportunity for the Indian PM to present his side of the story to make New Delhi’s case”.

But what could Modi offer to manage the Trump threat on tariffs and deportation?

What’s Modi’s likely game plan on deportation?

Singh noted the Indian government’s muted official reaction to the outrage over images of citizens returning from the US in cuffs.

That, he suggested, was a deliberate decision.

“Trump has some method in his madness. He uses whimsical statements to create maximum pressure,” said Singh. “It is not a good sense to then publicly confront him [on contentious issues].”

Instead, after an uproar in the parliament, India’s foreign minister, S Jaishankar, said that the use of restraints was part of the US’s deportation policy, adding that “it is the obligation of all countries to take back their nationals if they are found to be living illegally abroad”.

“Our focus should be on a strong crackdown on the illegal migration industry while taking steps to ease visas for legitimate travellers,” said Jaishankar.

How might Modi counter Trump on tariffs?

Trump has promised to announce further tariffs later this week, and though he hasn’t specified which countries or sectors might be targeted, India is expected to be affected.

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt said that she expected these reciprocal tariffs – against countries that Trump believes impose unfair restrictions on US imports – to be announced before the US president meets Modi.

Trump has already imposed a 10 percent tariff on all Chinese imports on top of existing tariffs and has introduced a 25 percent tariff on all steel and aluminium imports.

But when Modi meets Trump, the Indian PM could point to recent unilateral steps that India has taken to lower the barriers to entry for US goods, say analysts.

Traditionally, India, an emerging economy, has had high tariffs in place for several imported products that it feared could hurt its domestic industry and farm sector. However, in its latest budget, announced on February 1, the Modi government slashed tariffs and avoided any protectionist announcements.

Such steps might “preempt some action of the US administration”, said Danilowicz.

India, after all, is familiar with the risks of a tariff war with the US. In 2018, Trump had imposed tariffs of 25 percent on $761m of steel and 10 percent on $382m of aluminium imported from India, which retaliated by adding customs duties to at least 28 US products. After years of trade tensions, in 2023, a resolution was announced during a Modi visit to Washington.

Modi will want to avoid a repeat.

“India has so far escaped the direct tariff heat by the new Trump administration and that is a positive sign,” said Biswajit Dhar, a distinguished professor at the Council for Social Development in New Delhi.

Dhar, an international trade expert, told Al Jazeera that Modi needs to use this meeting “to convince Trump that India plays a fair game vis-a-vis trade and, therefore, India should be treated differently.”

“If China is slapped with these kinds of tariffs, then the same thing should not happen to India,” Dhar said, adding that the “personalised background” to the duo’s relationship should allow space to accommodate these discussions. “At the least, India would not like itself to be clubbed along with China.”

After all, China – or rather the shared suspicion of Beijing’s plans for the Asia Pacific region – is the biggest glue that holds the India-US relationship together.

‘Commitment to QUAD’

Modi is only the fourth world leader to meet Trump since his re-election, after conflict-engaged Israel, Jordan and Japan, its ally in the Asia Pacific. Foreign policy experts told Al Jazeera that being invited this early in Trump’s term shows how important the US president considers ties with India.

China is a big part of that.

A day after Trump was sworn in as the 47th US president, his newly appointed secretary of state, Marco Rubio, held a meeting with fellow foreign ministers of India, Australia and Japan. The four nations – with a collective population of nearly two billion people and representing more than a third of global gross domestic produce (GDP) – form the Quad, a strategic forum focused on the Asia Pacific region.

The Modi-Trump phone call on January 27 also “emphasized their commitment to advance the US-India strategic partnership and the Indo-Pacific Quad partnership”, a US government statement after their conversation said.

“The Trump administration has clearly signalled that the Indo-Pacific region is a priority. And that’s clearly driven by the competition with China,” said Danilowicz, the former US diplomat.

But there’s another country that Trump and the US want to target – and there, New Delhi and Washington differ.

The Iran equation

A major storm is brewing between India and the US over Iran, said Michael Kugelman, the director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center, a Washington, DC-based think tank.

At the centre of tensions is the port of Chabahar on the Gulf of Oman, where India has made a multimillion-dollar investment in the hopes of developing a strategically located maritime facility. The port allows India to send food, aid and other commodities to landlocked Afghanistan and Central Asia via Iran, bypassing Pakistan, New Delhi’s archrival.

India had secured a sanctions waiver from the US during the first Trump administration for work related to Chabahar.

But in a national security presidential memorandum that Trump signed on February 4, he asked US Secretary of State Rubio to “modify or rescind sanctions waivers, particularly those that provide Iran any degree of economic or financial relief, including those related to Iran’s Chabahar port project”.

“Trump’s Iran policy could well become a flashpoint in the US-India relationship and can have a deleterious impact,” Kugelman told Al Jazeera, adding that Trump’s “maximalist position towards Iran” presents a delicate diplomatic situation for India.

‘Bonhomie’ and friction

Other niggles in ties – like allegations by US prosecutors that India’s spy agency attempted to assassinate an American citizen, Sikh separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun; or the US indictment of billionaire Gautam Adani over bribery charges – will continue to shadow bilateral ties, noted Kugelman.

“These issues will not necessarily come up in the immediate future, or at this meeting, but they are not going away anytime soon,” said Kugelman. “Given Trump’s maximalist position on tariffs, he’s going to try to do everything to incentivise countries to bring down and reduce tariffs.”

Indian diplomats and international foreign policy experts have said Modi’s celebrated ‘bromance’ equation with Trump provides India an edge on the table with other countries.

However, it does not necessarily translate into “a better deal”, said Danilowicz, the former US diplomat.

Trump says Putin wants peace in Ukraine, will begin talks on ending war

United States President Donald Trump has signalled a major shift in three years of US policy towards Kyiv, saying that he and Russian leader Vladimir Putin had spoken by phone and agreed to begin negotiations on ending the war in Ukraine.

Trump said he spent more than an hour on the phone with Putin on Wednesday, and “I think we’re on the way to getting peace”.

He noted that he later spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but he was noncommittal about whether Ukraine would be an equal participant in US negotiations with Russia on ending the war.

“I think President Putin wants peace and President Zelenskyy wants peace and I want peace,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

Recounting his call with Putin, Trump said: “People didn’t really know what President Putin’s thoughts were. But I think I can say with great confidence, he wants to see it ended also, so that’s good – and we’re going to work toward getting it ended and as fast as possible.”

Trump said that he would “probably” meet in person with Putin in the near term, suggesting that a meeting could take place in Saudi Arabia.

Asked specifically about Ukraine being an equal member in a potential peace process, Trump responded, “Interesting question. I think they have to make peace.”

Trump’s conversation with Putin may also signal that Washington and Moscow could work to hammer out a deal to end fighting in Ukraine by going around Kyiv, a development that would break with the previous Biden administration, which had steadfastly insisted that Ukraine’s leadership would be a full participant in any decisions made.

In his nightly address to the nation, Zelenskyy appeared to put on a brave face saying that Trump had informed him of his conversation with Putin and that he appreciated the US president’s “genuine interest in our shared opportunities and how we can bring about a real peace together”.

“We believe that America’s strength, together with Ukraine and all of our partners, is enough to push Russia to peace,” he later wrote on social media.

Ukraine NATO membership unrealistic

Earlier, in another blow to Kyiv, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at NATO headquarters in Brussels that Ukraine’s ambition to join NATO was unrealistic.

“We want, like you, a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine. But we must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective,” Hegseth said at the NATO meeting.

“Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering,” he said.

Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimea in 2014 and it is still considered occupied territory by Ukraine and many Western countries.

Hegseth said any durable peace must include “robust security guarantees to ensure that the war will not begin again”. But he said US troops would not be deployed to Ukraine as part of such guarantees.

Trump said later about NATO membership for Ukraine: “I don’t think it’s practical to have it, personally”.

Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Biden administration joined other NATO members in declaring that Kyiv’s membership in the Western military alliance was “inevitable”.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the conversation between Trump and Putin covered a good deal of ground, including the Middle East and Iran, but that Ukraine was the main focus.

Peskov said Trump had called for a quick cessation of hostilities and a peaceful settlement, and that “President Putin, in his turn, emphasised the need to remove the root causes of the conflict and agreed with Trump that a long-term settlement could be achieved through peace talks.”

“The Russian president supported one of the main theses of the US president that the time has come for our two countries to work together,” Peskov told reporters.

“The Russian president invited the US president to visit Moscow and expressed readiness to host US officials in Russia for issues of mutual interest, naturally including Ukraine, the Ukrainian settlement.”

Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was also in Kyiv on Wednesday on the first visit by a member of Trump’s cabinet amid reports that Ukraine has offered to strike a deal with Trump for continued US military aid in exchange for developing Ukraine’s mineral industry.

4,000 COVID-19 Survivors to Donate Plasma for Research on Cure

According to Shincheonji Church of Jesus, a South Korea-based religious group, over 4,000 members of the church who recovered from COVID-19 are willing to donate plasma for developing a new treatment.

Mr. Man Hee Lee, founder of the Shincheonji Church, said that members of the church are advised to donate plasma voluntarily. “As Jesus sacrificed himself with his blood for life, we hope that the blood of people can bring positive effects on overcoming the current situation,” said Mr. Lee.

Read More