Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Tunisian judge orders detention of prominent lawyer Ahmed Souab

Lawyers claim that two days after his arrest for making comments about the judiciary, a Tunisian judge ruled in favor of Ahmed Souab, a well-known lawyer who fiercely criticizes President Kais Saeed.

Political parties and civil society organizations criticized Souab’s arrest as a dangerous step in the development of dissent and as a further encroachment of the nation’s authoritarian regime.

This week, activists took to the streets to demand that Saied be freed, chant slogans against him, and put an end to critics’ harassment, isolation, and imprisonment.

In the massive trial last week, Souab and other defendants received sentences of up to 66 years, including vocal opponents of Saied.

After saying before his clients’ sentencing that “knives are not on the neck of detainees, but on the neck of the judge issuing the ruling,” criticizing political pressure judges were allegedly under, the lawyer was detained on Monday in a police raid on his home in Tunis.

The comment was seen as a threat to judges by an anti-terrorist court, but Souab’s attorneys claimed it was a reference to the judges’ intense political pressure.

As they protest in front of a Tunisi court, activists and members of human rights organizations display a banner urging “No to remote trials, No to a judiciary that does not guarantee rights, Freedom for political detainees.”

According to a court spokesperson, Souab had been detained on “terrorism-related charges” related to the statement.

As a former administrative judge and lawyer, Souab has voiced his opposition to Saied, who has claimed on numerous occasions that the judiciary has lost its independence.

After the judge informed his attorneys that he had chosen only four of the dozens of attorneys to represent him, they decided to boycott Wednesday’s hearing.

The detained lawyer’s son, Saeb Souab, claimed that “my father is now suspected of terrorism,” using metaphors.

Saeb Souab, the former law professor, said to President Saied, “This is not the law you taught us.”

He demanded the release of his father, who he claimed has heart problems.

Hasty trial, please.

Rights activists and opposition figures have decried a halt to freedoms in the North African nation where the 2011 Arab Spring erupted since Saied launched a power grab in the summer of 2021.

The recent mass trial has been criticized as politically motivated and unfounded by critics. According to their attorneys, the defendants were charged with “conspiracy against state security” and “belonging to a terrorist group.”

Among those targeted are former Ennahdha leaders and former leaders Rached Ghannouchi, former Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi, former Justice Minister Noureddine Bhiri, and political executive Said Ferjani from the party’s political executive.

However, the crackdown has also had an impact on a number of non-Ennahdha figures, including project director Abderrazek Krimi and Ennahdha critic Abir Moussi.

Some of them had been detained in February of this year, and Saied later referred to them as “terrorists.”

Bassam Khawaja, Human Rights Watch’s deputy director for Middle East and North Africa, noted that the Tunisian court did not provide defendants with even the slightest inkling of a fair trial.

Tunisia “made it abundantly clear that anyone engaging in political opposition or civic activism could face years in prison,” he continued.

Trump administration considers China tariff cuts: Report

According to an unnamed source, the administration of US President Donald Trump is considering lowering US tariffs on Chinese goods in the course of discussions with Beijing.

According to a report released on Wednesday, Reuters reported that no unilateral decisions would be made.

The White House is considering lowering its tariffs on Chinese imports in a bid to de-escalate tensions, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). According to the paper, citing a White House official, China’s tariffs could drop from their current level of 145 percent to between 50 and 65 percent.

Trump stated to reporters on Wednesday that “we will have a fair deal with China,” but he did not go into specifics about the WSJ report. His comments came in response to his reassurances that a tariff reduction deal was possible, which he made on Tuesday.

Scott Bessent, the US Treasury Secretary, also declined to comment on the WSJ story, but said he wouldn’t be surprised if tariffs dropped. Bessent said both nations don’t agree with the current rates, but he is unsure when any negotiations might begin. Before trade talks can begin, Bessent added that there must be a de-escalation.

Bessent said, “I believe both sides are awaiting communication.”

According to sources, separate discussions between the two nations regarding tackling the fentanyl epidemic have not yet produced any results.

Any tariff reports were “pure speculation,” according to White House spokesman Kush Desai, unless they were made directly from Trump.

Still in the high

The Wall Street Journal report’s recommendations for tariff levels would still likely still be high enough to deter significant trade between the world’s two largest economies. On Wednesday, German shipper Hapag-Lloyd announced that 30% of its US-bound shipments from China had been canceled.

China has retaliated by imposing 125 percent tariffs on US imports, among other measures.

Following the release, US stocks increased their gains in the first session. After Trump rebuffed threats to fire the head of the US Federal Reserve and claimed a deal with China was possible, the market had surged sharply higher. In mid-morning trading, the benchmark S&amp, P 500 index, increased by roughly 3 percent.

According to The WSJ, discussions are still ongoing and have several options open up. A three-tiered approach, similar to the one suggested by the House of Representatives Committee on China late last year, would be possible: levies of at least 100% for items deemed to be strategic in US interests, and at least 35 percent for items that the US considers not to be a threat to national security. Those taxes were proposed in the bill’s proposal to gradually increase over five years.

Trump has also imposed a blanket 10% tariff on all other US imports, as well as higher duties on steel, aluminum, and cars. He has proposed additional industry-specific levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, as well as suspending targeted tariffs on dozens of other nations until July 9. Financial markets have been stung by that, which has heightened worries of a global recession.

Ben-Gvir: US Republicans support bombing Gaza ‘food and aid depots’

Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right Israeli minister, claims that prominent US Republican lawmakers support the bombing of “food and aid depots” in Gaza.

The Israeli national security minister said he had met with senior Republican Party officials at [US President Donald] Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate] in Florida, in the United States, in a statement posted on social media on Wednesday.

Ben-Gvir posted on X in Hebrew, “They expressed support for my very clear position on how to act in Gaza and for the bombing of the food and aid depots to impose military and political pressure on them to bring our hostages home safely.”

According to his public schedule, the US president was not present.

Which Republicans were present, according to Ben-Gvir’s post. Ben-Gvir’s office confirmed to Israeli media that Tom Emmer, a Republican representative who is regarded as the third-highest-ranking member of the US House of Representatives, was one of the lawmakers present.

Ben-Gvir’s office was mentioned in reports about Emmer’s presence, which also appeared to be confirmed by video of the event, by The Times of Israel and the Jewish News Syndicate.

The congressman has frequently claimed that Hamas, and not Israel, is to blame for the high rate of civilian deaths in the Palestinian enclave, and has been one of the most influential members of the US Congress supporting Israel in the wake of the conflict in Gaza.

Concerning the Mar-a-Lago visit and whether the congressman supported Ben-Gvir’s position on attacking food and aid sites, an Emmer spokesman declined to respond to an Al Jazeera request for comment.

[File: J. Scott Applewhite/The Associated Press] House Majority Whip Tom Emmer can be seen at the US Capitol in Washington, DC.

Since the start of the conflict, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, at least 51,300 Palestinians have died as a result of the Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7 and at least 1,139 of those have died.

Israeli attacks and aid are still being carried out.

Ben-Gvir has been one of Israel’s most vocal advocates for an escalation of Israel’s assault on Gaza.

He has firmly supported Trump’s plan to forcibly relocate residents of the Palestinian enclave and has advocated for the resettlement of Gaza.

In opposition to a temporary ceasefire, he initially resigned from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet in January.

Before resuming his position with the government in March, he demanded that Israel stop providing water and electricity to Gazans and bomb aid depots as the six-week-long fighting drew to a close.

1, 928 Palestinians have been killed since March 18 when Israeli airstrikes resumed.

A lasting ceasefire agreement has remained elusive despite Trump’s pledge to end the conflict when he took office.

Meanwhile, Israel’s continued blocking of Gaza’s access to food, medicine, and resources was condemned by France, Germany, and the UK on Wednesday.

Trump accuses Ukraine’s Zelenskyy of harming Russia negotiations

Volodymyr Zelenskyy is accused of making “very harmful” statements by US President Donald Trump after he resisted giving Crimea to Russia in a potential peace deal.

Before discussions with US, European, and Ukrainian officials on Wednesday in London, President Zelenskyy on Tuesday ruled out the possibility of Ukraine ceding territory to Russia in any deal. Zelenskyy said, “There is nothing to talk about; it is our country, the country of the Ukrainian people.”

His remarks came after US media reported that the Trump administration was ready to grant Russian-to-Russian recognition of annexed land in Crimea.

Trump accused Zelenskyy of “boasting” that Kyiv would not legally recognize giving Crimea to Russia in a post on the Truth Social platform on Wednesday.

Trump claimed that “this statement is very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia” and that “no shot was fired” was fired upon Russian aggression against the Crimean Peninsula.

Trump argued that it’s because of inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that it’s so difficult to end this war. He has two options: “He can have peace or he can fight for three more years before losing the entire nation.”

US Vice President JD Vance earlier stated to reporters in India that the country has “issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and the Ukrainians.”

He continued, “It’s either for them to say “yes” or for the United States to withdraw from this process.”

Any agreement would require land swaps, according to Vance.

He added that allowing the Ukrainians and the Russians to retake some of their current territory would require them both to do so.

London converses

US, Ukrainian, and European officials held “substantive” truce talks in London despite US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s decision to halt his travel.

A broader meeting with foreign ministers from Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany was replaced by discussions at an official level due to Rubio’s no-show on Wednesday, underscoring the tension between Washington, Kyiv, and its European allies over Russia’s conflict in Ukraine.

Russian Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson, Keir Starmer, refrained from expressing his disappointment at Rubio’s abrupt cancellation, saying that the discussions included “substantive technical meetings with European, US, and Ukrainian officials on how to stop the fighting,” which were sparked by Russia’s 2022 invasion.

These discussions today are a significant component of our commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, the spokesperson said.

Following Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff’s proposals that appeared to demand more concessions from Ukraine than Russia, a tentative agreement was at the heart of Wednesday’s discussions.

According to several sources, Witkoff’s proposals included allowing Russia to annex Crimea in 2014, allowing Washington to impose sanctions on Russia, and forbidding Ukraine from joining NATO.

According to Zein Basravi of Al Jazeera, Ukrainians find the US position “unacceptable” in their daily lives. He claimed that “the US would ask an ally to give up sovereign territory of its own after an invasion” is “the Ukraine’s position is that it boggles the mind.”

According to Mattia Nelles, the director of the German-Ukrainian Bureau think tank in Düsseldorf, Europe is now trying to draw red lines and keep Ukraine from “thrown under the bus.”

What we know about the funeral of Pope Francis

Vatican City – Pope Francis’s funeral will be held in the Vatican on Saturday at 10am local time (8:00 GMT), with hundreds of thousands of guests and mourners expected to attend the late pontiff’s final ceremonies.

US President Donald Trump and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will be among the dozens of dignitaries travelling to the Vatican for the ceremony, which will be a simpler affair than previous papal funerals.

Last year, the Argentine pope amended the funeral rites to show that he was a “disciple of Christ” rather than “a powerful man of this world”.

The faithful queue to enter St Peter’s Basilica to pay respects as Pope Francis lies in state, as seen from Rome on April 23, 2025 [Hannah McKay/Reuters]

Who will be there?

As well as being a major religious event, papal funerals also have an important diplomatic dimension.

The pope is the head of the Roman Catholic Church, but he also leads the Holy See – a sovereign juridical entity with a seat at the United Nations – and the Vatican city-state. There are some 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide, concentrated above all in Europe, the Americas and increasingly in Africa.

For this reason, papal funerals tend to attract large numbers of political figures. When Pope John Paul II died in 2005, his funeral attracted some 70 presidents and prime ministers – making it one of the largest gatherings of world leaders in history.

Among those to have already confirmed their attendance for Francis’s funeral on Saturday are US President Trump, the UN chief Guterres, and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has no plans to attend, according to the Kremlin, but there will be a delegation from China.

Alongside these political figures, there will be large numbers of Catholics and other well-wishers.

The Italian government said on Tuesday that it expected at least 200,000 foreigners to travel to Rome for the funeral. Although the Vatican is a sovereign state, it is located in the heart of the Italian capital, and Italy will help manage some elements of the logistics.

There is, however, some reason to think that the eventual turnout will be higher than the Italian government’s estimate – the last funeral of a sitting pope, John Paul II, attracted some four million attendees.

That said, the number of mourners on Saturday might not quite reach that high. While both popes enjoyed high levels of popularity, John Paul had served for 26 years, compared to Francis’s 12. Moreover, John Paul’s native Poland – where he had a huge number of admirers – was close enough to Italy to facilitate large-scale travel.

What will happen at the funeral?

In 2024, Pope Francis simplified the Rite of Burial for Roman Pontiffs, which lays out the rubrics for papal funerals.

According to the new rites, Francis will be buried in a single coffin, rather than the three used by previous popes.

Different language will be used, too – during the funeral, the pope will be called “Bishop of Rome”, “Pope”, “Pastor”, or “Roman Pontifex”, with grander titles such as “Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church” now avoided.

Mirticeli Medeiros, a Catholic Church historian and Vatican correspondent for Brazil’s GloboNews, told Al Jazeera that “Francis’s simplification of the funeral rituals reflects not only his humility, which was well known, but also his revolution of the institution of the papacy”.

“He always said that he did not feel comfortable with the idea that the Vatican was the last absolute monarchy of Europe,” Medeiros said. “That is why, from the very beginning, he presented himself as ‘Bishop of Rome’, which for him was the most dignified title – he was a bishop, a pastor and a Christian like any other.”

Explaining the changes, Archbishop Diego Ravelli, master of Papal Liturgical Ceremonies, said that the aim was to highlight that the pope’s funeral is “that of a shepherd and disciple of Christ, and not of a powerful man of this world”.

Archbishop Ravelli added that it was Francis himself who had stressed the need to “adapt certain rites, so that the celebration of the funeral of the Bishop of Rome might better express the Church’s faith in the risen Christ”.

Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, the 91-year-old Italian who is currently dean of the College of Cardinals, is expected to preside over the pope’s funeral mass.

He will lead those present in prayers and Bible readings, and will deliver the final commendation and valediction, entrusting the pope’s soul to God.

The funeral will be held in a variety of different languages, reflecting the Catholic Church’s international nature and the varied backgrounds of those present.

It is likely that – as is the case for most masses of this kind at the Vatican – the main prayers will be said in Latin and Italian, with Bible readings in Italian, Spanish, and English, and a number of shorter prayers in other languages such as Arabic, Polish, and Chinese.

A Catholic Christian holds up a portrait of Pope Francis during a procession in Jerusalem's old city ahead of a memorial mass for the late pontiff at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem on April 23, 2025.
A Catholic Christian holds up a portrait of Pope Francis during a procession in Jerusalem’s old city ahead of a memorial mass for the late pontiff at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem on April 23, 2025. (AFP)

What happens after the funeral?

After Pope Francis’s funeral, his coffin will be transferred to the Basilica of St Mary Major, a church lying outside the Vatican’s walls that he was particularly fond of visiting.

Francis will be the first pope to be buried there since the 1600s, and the first in over 100 years to be buried outside the Vatican.

In his final testament, released on Monday, the pope asked that his tomb be “in the ground; simple, without particular ornamentation”, and specified that the only word should be his papal name in Latin: “Franciscus.”

A plain gravestone in a church that hasn’t held a pope’s remains in centuries – it’s a fitting final resting place for a man who will be remembered by many for his humility and his independence.

“After his election in 2013, the pope first appeared in public wearing simple white vestments, as a way to demonstrate his desire for a less ostentatious church”, Christopher White, Vatican correspondent for National Catholic Reporter, told Al Jazeera.