Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Will Gen Z ever be able to retire?

We examine how Gen Z is changing the idea of retirement itself.

Millions of young people are turning away from traditional retirement plans because the current economic climate is no longer reflected in the system. Generation Z isn’t interested in climbing the corporate ladder. They are instead pursuing their own interests. But will they ever be able to retire truly? Traditional pensions seem like a relic of the past because of rising costs, job instability, and uncertain economic conditions. Does Gen Z require job preparation for the long haul?

Presenter: Anelise Borges

The world must not accept the ‘new normal’ in Palestine

The tension was palpable when I made my way back to my hometown in the occupied West Bank in January. It made me think of the second Intifada, which I experienced first-hand when I was a child. Constant Israeli settlers’ attacks caused fear, anxiety, and an increased sense of uncertainty. Checkpoints obstructing travel and entry to the town and from there made it difficult for Palestinians to endure hours-long waits and humiliations.

During the olive-picking season, Israeli settlers had burned my family’s property weeks prior to my visit. Following a similar attack last summer and two more the year before, which had destroyed homes, crops, and ancient olive trees.

My father claimed that because the armed settlers were being guarded by Israeli forces, he stood powerless and was unable to extinguish the fire. There wouldn’t have been enough water to put out the fire because nearby illegal settlements divert it, even if the soldiers hadn’t been there to stop any action to save the property.

After October 7, 2023, violence erupted sharply across the occupied West Bank, which has continued to worsen for years. Just the past two years saw the murder of nearly half of all Palestinian children who have been victims of Israeli forces or settlers.

A two-year-old was fatally shot in the head by an Israeli sniper inside her family home this year, and a 23-year-old pregnant woman was also killed by Israeli fire. These are not just isolated incidents, but they are a part of a larger pattern of Palestinian murder occurring at an unprecedented rate.

Israeli military operations target Palestinian homes frequently and place them inarbitrary detention. More than 300 of the 10, 000 Palestinians who are still incarcerated in Israeli prisons are children, the majority of whom are innocent and unable to determine when or when they will see their families again.

At faster rates, homes are destroyed, and homes are attacked in villages. Palestinians’ daily lives have become intolerable because of the expansion of the occupation’s architecture, which includes checkpoints, barriers, and permits. Since October 7, nearly 900 new military checkpoints and barriers have been installed. This has increased an already terrible humanitarian crisis by imposing severe movement restrictions and preventing access to essential services.

What was once unimaginable has turned into “routine” and is now accepted by everyone. Israeli airstrikes on refugee camps, hospitals under siege, and children who were shot in front of their homes are some examples of what’s happening now. Similar to Gaza, violent such incidents have become frequent.

Remember Gaza’s first hospital attack? The first instance of a school that provides shelter for the internally displaced? The first fire from an Israeli airstrike tore through the displaced and alive people’s tents? Now make an effort to recall the final one. Such violent incidents have become so commonplace that they are ultimately accepted as a terrible reality in a foreign country.

In the occupied West Bank, the same thing is happening right now.

As the United Nations representative for Save the Children, I observe how this dynamic is expressed on a global scale. A culture of impunity has been created as a result of Israeli forces’ persistent inability to hold accountable for crimes like the killing of journalists and human rights workers.

Even when Palestine is the subject of international attention, it seems irrelevant. No Other Land, a Palestinian-Israeli film, won the Oscar for best documentary earlier this month.

Palestinian filmmaker Basel Adra, who accepted the award, expressed his fear for his newborn daughter’s future, saying that she would not have to go through the same kind of poverty as him.

The attacks on Masafer Yatta, Adra’s community, by Israeli soldiers and settlers have only increased, despite the movie receiving the highest accolades (or perhaps because of it). The international community has not taken any significant action in relation to it.

People can be excused for being enraged by the ongoing brutality that has been occurring for more than a year and a half. Only people can experience numbness. In addition, so many people have been exposed to media scrutiny, which has consistently dehumanized and marginalized Palestinians, severing human connection and empathy.

However, failing to take action against governments cannot be pardoned. They are legally required to uphold international law. Its standards are not negotiationable, and they are not relative.

The truth is that those entrusted with upholding international law’s standards have normalized the shocking violations that are occurring in Gaza and the West Bank.

We must demand that governments and international organizations hold perpetrators accountable for their deeds. For example, halting arms transfers and supporting mechanisms to fight impunity for those who violate international law are included.

The international community must take decisive steps to restore international law. A rules-based global order’s very foundation is undermined by states that ignore these laws. All member states of the UN are obligated to follow the Geneva Conventions’ instructions, even though those who violate children’s rights and international law bear ultimate responsibility.

Weekly massacres are not typical. It is abnormal for a population to be on the verge of a man-made famine. Refugee camps are not subject to regular airstrikes. It is not typical to have two-tier rights based on ethnicity. It is against the law to confine, confine, and murder children.

The era of passive observation is over. The world must demand accountability, support humanitarian efforts, and reject the unacceptable. Every delay causes more deaths, and it weakens the system’s ability to protect people from all over the world.  Climate can only be used to break the current cycle of violence and ensure that all children in Palestine and Israel are respected and protected regardless of their race or religion.

DR Congo and M23 rebels confirm participation in Angola peace talks

Both the Congolese government and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group have confirmed their intention to engage in peace talks in Angola.

A delegation has been dispatched to Luanda, the capital of Angola, according to a M23 spokesperson on Monday. Since the start of this year’s major offensive, which has resulted in the death of many thousands, the rebel group has taken key locations of the mineral-rich east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

According to President Felix Tshisekedi’s spokesperson, a delegation from the DRC is currently in Luanda for the talks on Tuesday. Due to the conflict’s long-standing roots, Tshisekedi had previously refused to engage in direct negotiations with the rebel group.

According to M23 spokesperson Lawrence Kanyuka, M23 has also sent a delegation to Luanda.

For many months, Angola has been attempting to broker a ceasefire. After Rwanda insisted on direct dialogue between the DRC and M23, which the Congolese government rejected, peace talks were called off late last year.

However, Luanda made it known last week that it would hold peace talks directly.

Bertrand Bisimwa, the M23 leader, claimed last week that Tshisekedi had been forced into a negotiating position by the rebels, stating that dialogue is the first step toward peace. Peace comes about more quickly when we talk.

Humanitarian crisis

Early this year, M23 rebels launched a lightning offensive and seize the key cities of Goma and Bukavu, escalating the conflict in the eastern DRC.

In the mineral-rich eastern DRC, close to the Rwandan border, about 100 armed groups have been fighting for a foothold. One of the most significant humanitarian crises in history has been brought on by the conflict.

Since the start of the year, 7, 000 people have reportedly died, compared to more than 7 million who have been displaced.

According to the United Nations, M23 has pledged to march to Kinshasa, the capital of the DRC, and has about 4, 000 Rwandan soldiers supporting it.

Rwanda claims that its forces are defending Kigali against the Congolese army and militias.

The conflict, which has plagued the eastern DRC for decades, is rooted in the struggle for control of its vast mineral resources as well as its impact on Rwanda, which was the result of the genocide there in 1994.

Syria points finger at Hezbollah as fighting erupts on border with Lebanon

Along Lebanon’s southern border, fighting has broken out.

Following weekend skirmishes that resulted in the deaths of three Syrian soldiers, the violence continued overnight and into Monday. Hezbollah, an armed Lebanese group, is reportedly in contact with military officials in order to stop the violence from spreading, as Damascus has claimed.

According to unnamed officials, Syrian state media reported that the Syrian army had overnight shelled “Hezbollah gatherings that killed the Syrian soldiers” along the border.

Lebanon’s national army command confirmed the fighting on Monday and stated it had sent reinforcements to “control the security situation” in a statement to the official National News Agency.

Unconfirmed reports claimed Lebanese armed groups were involved in the fighting, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a war monitor based in the United Kingdom.

Numerous Lebanese troops were being stationed in the area, according to Lebanon’s military.

Following an attack on a Syrian military vehicle, Lebanon’s media reported early morning fighting.

Four journalists who were working alongside the Syrian army were seriously hurt early on Monday when a shell fired from the Lebanese side hit their position. Hezbollah was charged with initiating the attack, according to them.

Accusations

Which Lebanese organizations are involved in the conflict, it hasn’t been confirmed.

Hezbollah was accused of abducting three soldiers on Lebanese soil on Saturday and then killing them by entering Syria under the auspices of the interim government.

Recently, there has been an increase in violence between the Syrian military and armed Lebanese clans affiliated with President Bashar al-Assad’s ousted regime.

In Syria’s violent outcry last week, al-Assad’s supporters and Alawite community members had a sizable death toll.

According to reports from Lebanon’s media, the clans were also kidnapped.

The Syrian and Lebanese armies claim to have been negotiating border tensions. The three soldiers’ bodies were delivered to Syria by the Lebanese military, according to the statement.

On Monday, there were no pending reports of additional casualties. However, reports suggest that Syrian civilians fleeing to Hermel in Syria over the weekend due to shelling and fighting.

The border between Lebanon and Syria is 375 kilometers (233 miles) long and has rugged terrain with few clear lines of sight in many areas.

Hezbollah has denied being a part of the soldiers’ kidnapping and murder.

Hussein Haj Hassan, a senior Hezbollah legislator, claimed that Syrian fighters entered Lebanon’s Al Jadeed TV territory and attacked border villages in an interview.

As Lebanon gradually deploys troops along its porous northern and eastern borders with Syria and along its southern border with Israel, it has been looking for international support to boost funding for its military.

Trump deports 238 ‘gang members’ to El Salvador: What’s the controversy?

President Donald Trump’s administration deported alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua from the United States to El Salvador on Sunday, despite a court order prohibiting their expulsion from the country.

The move is the latest in a series of steps by the Trump administration to expel foreign nationals — some accused of being in the US without documentation, others targeted over campus protests.

Here is what happened, and whether it violated the court order.

What happened?

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said on Sunday that his country had received 238 members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and an additional 23 members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13 from the US.

Bukele had agreed to jail members of these groups on behalf of the US in a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio last month.

He added that these deportees were in the custody of the Central American country’s Centre for the Confinement of Terrorism (CECOT) for a one-year period that could be extended.

During Trump’s inauguration speech, he said he would invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. On Saturday, Trump signed a proclamation invoking that 227-year-old law. The proclamation claims that Tren de Aragua is “perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion” against US territory. It adds that all Venezuelan citizens aged 14 or older “who are members of” the gang and are not naturalised or lawful permanent US citizens are liable to be restrained and removed as “Alien Enemies”.

After Trump’s order, federal judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the District Court for the District of Columbia, issued a temporary restraining order to block Trump’s ability to exercise wartime powers to carry out deportations. This was during a hearing on Saturday sought by the American Civil Liberties Union.

But hours later, Bukele confirmed that the Trump administration had nevertheless gone ahead with the deportations. He shared a snippet of a news article about the judge’s ruling, captioning it: “Oopsie … Too late”, with a crying-with-laughter emoji.

What is the Alien Enemies Act and how does it work?

The Alien Enemies Act allows the US president to detain or deport non-citizens during wartime conditions. In 1798, the US was preparing for what it believed was a war with France. The law was introduced to prevent immigrants from sympathising with the French.

The law allows the president to carry out these deportations without a hearing and based only on citizenship.

The Act has been invoked only three times before, during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.

Why is this controversial?

While Trump and his allies have argued that the US is at threat of “invasion” of undocumented immigrants, critics say the president is wrongly invoking the wartime law.

An explainer published by the Brennan Center for Justice last year says invoking the Act “in peacetime to bypass conventional immigration law would be a staggering abuse”.

“The courts should strike down any attempted peacetime use of the Alien Enemies Act,” it adds.

The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution protects the right to a grand jury. “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,” it states, adding that wartime is one of the few exceptions to this.

The fact that the Trump administration possibly defied a judge’s order further exacerbates this controversy.

The White House’s action was in “open defiance” of Judge Boasberg’s order, Patrick Eddington, a homeland security and civil liberties legal expert at the Washington, DC-based Cato Institute, told the Reuters news agency.

“This is beyond the pale and certainly unprecedented,” Eddington said.

But White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has pushed back against the criticism.

“A single judge in a single city cannot direct the movements of an aircraft … full of foreign alien terrorists who were physically expelled from US soil,” Leavitt said in a statement posted on her X account on Sunday. She added that “federal courts generally have no jurisdiction over the President’s conduct of foreign affairs”.

Bruce Fein, an American lawyer specialising in constitutional and international law, disagreed.

“The President is not a king. January 20, 2025, was not a coronation. The President is not Napoleon … Federal courts have jurisdiction over the President,” Fein told Al Jazeera. “The probability that Trump flouted Judge James Boasberg’s order is high, but we need to await more due process,” he added.

Leavitt argued that by the time the court order was issued, the deportees had been removed from the US. The exact timings of the deportation flight are unclear.

Steve Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University’s Law Center, posted on Bluesky that “a federal court’s jurisdiction does *not* stop at the water’s edge.” In other words, according to Vladeck, those deportees ought to be brought back to the US even if they had left the US airspace by the time the judge passed his order.

“The court’s jurisdiction turns on the presence of the defendant in the United States, not the plaintiffs,” Fein explained, adding that Trump, the defendant in this case, is in the US. “He could be ordered to return deportees who had been illegally deported to the United States.”

Why were these migrants sent to El Salvador?

Bukele is detaining the deportees under a deal where the US would compensate El Salvador to hold them, Bukele wrote in an X post. The Trump administration will pay approximately $6m to El Salvador for detaining about 300 alleged Tren de Aragua members from Venezuela for a year.

The Salvadorian president also shared a video on his account showing the handcuffed deportees being dragged and having their heads and faces shaved by masked El Salvador police officers.

“The United States will pay a very low fee for them, but a high one for us.”

Venezuela has typically not accepted deportees from the US. The Trump administration has sent Venezuelan deportees to third countries in Central America “because the US does not have decent relations with Venezuela”, Clive Stafford Smith, a human rights lawyer, told Al Jazeera earlier.

Over the past month, Venezuela has accepted some 350 deportees, including about 180 detained at the Guantanamo Bay US naval base in Cuba, for 16 days. As of 2022, there were 275,000 unauthorised Venezuelan immigrants in the US, according to estimates by the Pew Research Center.

What is the CECOT?

The Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, which means the Centre for the Confinement of Terrorism, is a 40,000-capacity maximum-security prison in El Salvador. That is where the alleged gang members deported by the US are now being held.

The mega-prison prohibits visitation, education and recreation. Inmates are not allowed to go outdoors.

CECOT opened in January 2023, within a year of Bukele ordering the construction. It is located in Tecoluca, 72km (45 miles) east of the Salvadorian capital, San Salvador.

What is the Tren de Aragua?

Tren de Aragua, which is Spanish for “the train of Aragua”, is designated to be a “foreign terrorist organization” (FTO) by the US.

While information about the group is sparse, media reports have previously suggested that the group was formed in 2014 by Hector “El Nino” Guerrero and two other men who were imprisoned in Tocoron prison in the Venezuelan state of Aragua. The gang largely controlled the prison, ordering robberies, murders and kidnappings from behind bars.

The gang is alleged to be behind the 2024 murder of former Venezuelan army officer Ronald Ojeda, who conspired against President Nicolas Maduro. In January, Maduro was sworn in for his third six-year term after a contentious election.

A proclamation published by the White House alleges that Tren de Aragua “operates in conjunction with Cartel de los Soles, the Nicolas Maduro regime-sponsored, narco-terrorism enterprise based in Venezuela”.

What’s next?

On Sunday, Trump asked the DC Circuit Court for a stay of Boasberg’s order. “The stay will assuredly be denied within days,” Fein predicted.

As Islam grows in Russia, Muslim prisoners struggle to practise their faith

In November 2023, Nariman Dzhelyal arrived in a icy Siberian jail and ate nothing but gruel and bread.

The devout Muslim is the bespectacled, bearded leader of the Crimean Tatar community. He claimed that pork was a major component of the meals he was served, which is against Islamic law.

Dzhelyal, who had been given a 17-year prison sentence for “blowing up a natural gas pipeline” and “smuggling explosives” in a trial Ukraine called Kremlin-orchestrated, told Al Jazeera, “I just took bread, it wasn’t of good quality, and ate it with tea.”

He refuted every claim made against him.

His diet slightly improved after arriving in Minusinsk, a dull town.

Only one lunch item had pork, and the rest of the meals had no flavor at all. Suppers had fish and only one of the lunches had pork.

However, the diet is not by far the biggest issue facing Russia’s infamously cruel penitentiary system’s tens of thousands of Muslims.

Soviet and Russian prisons have been characterized as a mysterious underworld governed by unwritten laws for almost a century.

The “crowned thieves” or “the black caste,” who have long since become criminals, still have elaborate tattoos, use sophisticated slang, and adhere to a strict, ruthless hierarchy.

The “black prisons” that they control are where wardens work with “crowned thieves” and ignore drug trafficking, card games, and extreme violence.

Wardens have control in “red prisons,” or “red prisons.” Career criminals have alleged that prison guards have provided inhumane conditions, including rape, solitary confinement, and torture.

Tens of thousands of Muslims have been found guilty of “terrorism,” “extremism,” or other crimes, but a third force has started to affect Russia’s prison population in the past two decades.

143 million people, or about 15% of Russia’s population, are Muslims. They represent the population’s population decline’s fastest-growing group.

According to Russian Mufti Albir Krganov, who reportedly made up 31, 000 of 206, 000 prisoners, in total, the number of prisons is roughly the same.

Since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the prison population in Russia has more than halved. Unknown are the number of Muslims who volunteered or were drafted in exchange for pardons.

Russian convicts who convert to Islam are “automatically” listed as terror suspects, according to reports from rights organizations and media outlets, and have their sentences sporadically shortened for “extremism.”

Former analyst with Russia’s top prisoner-related organization, the Federal Service for Execution of Punishment, Anna Karetnikova, told Al Jazeera, “If a convict converts to Orthodox Christianity and gets baptized, he’ll be celebrated.”

According to Karetnikova, who previously worked at an agency overseeing penitentiaries in Moscow and at the Memorial rights group, “he will be listed as someone prone to extremism, his prison’s administration will be punished,” and intelligence services will pay particular attention to him.

According to rights groups, Central Asian Muslim migrants who work in Russia face criminal punishment because of their poor knowledge of Russian law and customs, according to rights groups.

Some people have been forced to fight in Ukraine, according to reports, while others have claimed that Russian police and prosecutors have targeted and prosecuted them for crimes they have committed.

In 2022, Abdulaziz, a construction worker in Moscow, claimed police had planted synthetic substances known as “spice” on his younger brother Abdulmumin.

Abdulmumin allegedly “confessed” to putting drug stashes under park benches after being electrocuted and beat him with plastic water bottles that leave no bruises.

Then, according to Abdulaziz, a judge sentenced Abdulmumin to five and a half years in prison in the Ural Mountains region, adding that, thanks to the number of “green” prisoners there, there are still enough “green” prisoners, referring to Muslim prisoners.

The only problem is the guards, he said, “They proved themselves on the zone” and, using a slang term for jail, “they proved themselves on the zone.” They also use a blind eye when required.

Abdulaziz declined to provide his last name and other details. His claims were not independently verified by Al Jazeera.

Muslim prisoners are not well suited in some Russian jails.

According to rights groups, schedules in some prisons forbid eating and leaving beds between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., making each early morning and late evening prayer a violation. Some convicts find it difficult to work during the Ramadan.

However, there are attempts to educate prison staff.

They must be taught the fundamentals of Islam, as well as the psychology of the [Muslim] prisoners they employ. According to Azat Gaunutdinov, an ethnic Tatar man who converted to Islam in prison and founded a rights organization to monitor the rights of Muslim convicts, “a Muslim prayer alone is a manifestation of extremism”,” he told the Kavkazsky Uzel news website in 2020.

According to a Russian mufti, Arkady Budnitsky/EPA-EFE, more than 30 000 of the country’s prisoners are Muslims.

Depending on the prisons, the situation frequently changes.

Dzhelyal, the Crimean Tatar leader, was given leniency by the wardens in Minusinsk, where he spent the majority of his sentence.

He and other Muslims were permitted to pray in their beds and consume their meals during the Ramadan.

Rights groups claim that they could borrow the Quran and other Muslim books from the prison library, in contrast to Muslims in other prisons, where the Quran and Arabic are completely forbidden and only some Russian translations are permitted.

Some jailed Muslims, such as those who smuggle cigarettes, mobile phones, or alcohol and drugs, refuse to engage in illegal activities while they are imprisoned, according to Dzhelyal.

“We have no use for these criminal rules of yours,” claim some Muslims, in fact. Because of the fact that [these rules] frequently conflict with the values that all Muslims live by, Dzhelyal said.

When the second Chechenya war broke out in the early 2000s, the number of Muslim prisoners in Russian jails started to rise.

In other North Caucasus provinces, particularly in multiethnic Dagestan, the Kremlin stepped up its clampdown on what it called “extremists.” There were many jails.