France’s big protest: Who’s on strike, why and what’s next?

Hundreds of protesters have taken to the streets across France against budget cuts proposed by the government under President Emmanuel Macron as the nation battles a high deficit and debt.

More than a dozen trade unions joined forces on Thursday, went on strike and rallied people in large cities, including Paris, Lyon, Lille and Marseille, to express anger against the economic plans.

The unrest followed Prime Minister Francois Bayrou’s resignation last week after a vote of no confidence and a popular backlash against his government’s fiscal policies. Macron’s selection of a close ally, Sebastien Lecornu, as the new prime minister has further incited anger among many people across the country.

Thursday’s strikes also follow the Block Everything antigovernment protests that took place last week. Hundreds of protesters were arrested as part of the nationwide movement, which saw 175,000 people take part and large police deployments in response. Angry mobs set fires to block highways and petrol stations across the country, erected barricades, and caused damage that halted train and vehicular traffic, officials said.

Here’s what’s we know about Thursday’s protests and why they are happening:

What happened on Thursday?

Protesters gathered early in cities across France, including in Paris, to mount roadblocks across streets and highways. Several tourist attractions, such as the Arc de Triomphe and the Louvre in Paris as well as some metro stations were shut down or were partially open as a result of the strike.

With one-third of teachers expected to strike, many schools were also closed. Some businesses and most pharmacies were not operating.

In Paris, protesters clashed with police as officials tried to clear barricades. In the southeastern city of Chambery, dozens cycled on the streets to disrupt traffic. Students in Paris, Marseille and Rennes in the northwest also took part and blocked school entrances. Some held up banners that read, “Tax the rich”.

Across the country, Palestinian flags were visible as some protesters also stood in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza during Israel’s war on the strip. Protesters blocked the Eurolinks arms factory in Marseille, which is believed to supply equipment to Israel, while holding a large banner that read: “Shut down the genocidal factory.”

The French national rail company SNCF said in a statement early on Thursday that while “a few disruptions” were expected on high-speed trains in France and Europe, most were expected to function as usual.

However, regional rail lines, as well as the Paris Metro and commuter trains, were expected to be more seriously disrupted after 91 percent of drivers in the capital city had put in strike notices. Air traffic disruptions were minimal as related unions postponed strike plans to October.

Utility company EDF reduced nuclear energy production by 1.1 gigawatts, according to reporting by state-owned broadcaster France 24, as workers lowered output as part of the strike.

Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau earlier warned of possible disturbances by leftist groups. The government deployed about 80,000 police and gendarmes, supported by drones, armoured vehicles and water cannon, to keep order.

Demonstrators march during a protest called by trade unions to oppose budget cuts in Nantes in western France on September 18, 2025 [Mathieu Pattier/AP]

Why are unions protesting?

The protests and strike were organised by several trade unions, mainly in response to budget cuts proposed by the government for 2026.

Bayrou initially proposed the cuts in July to tackle what he said was a “life-threatening” debt burden in France. He aimed to cut public spending by 44 billion euros ($52bn) in 2026.

Bayrou’s measures included: a freeze on pensions; higher healthcare costs and the scrapping of two public holidays to generate more economic activity.

However, the proposals met strong opposition in parliament as well as on the streets. Far-left parties and the far right banded together to vote against Bayrou, ending his nine-month run and rejecting the budget proposals. Analysts called it a blow to Macron’s centrist Renaissance party as Bayrou was the fourth prime minister ousted in less than two years.

Lecornu, the former defence minister who was appointed prime minister the same day, has promised to scrap lifelong privileges enjoyed by prime ministers and abandon the public holiday cuts. However, many voters remain unconvinced, and Thursday’s protests were aimed as a warning to Lecornu, analysts said.

“We feel that our colleagues were not fooled by the appointment of Sebastien Lecornu,” said Sophie Venetitay, general secretary of SNES-FSU. the largest union for middle and high school teachers.

Anger was already mounting against the Macron government in general over higher fuel taxes imposed in 2018 – and later scrapped after large-scale protests. In April 2023, Macron again angered many when he forced through pension reforms that raised the retirement age from 62 to 64 to generate more economic activity. That policy was not reversed despite large protests also led by trade unions.

What are the protesters’ demands?

Trade unions are demanding a reversal of the budget cuts and have urged Lecornu to abandon the current budget plans, warning that they would negatively affect wages, job security and access to public services.

They argued that the plans are unfair and the rich and corporations should be taxed more to close the budget gaps.

In a statement in August before Lecornu was appointed, eight trade unions described the proposed measures as ones that targeted workers, those in precarious employment, retirees and the sick, who they said would be made to “pay the price” to reduce the debt.

The unions also blamed the current debt crisis on Macron’s tax relief for businesses after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Meanwhile, the unions have continued to call on Macron to undo the pension reforms he earlier forced through.

On Thursday, some protesters also called for Macron to resign. The president, who faces low approval ratings, is due to leave office in May 2027.

What happened at Block Everything protests?

During the Block Everything protests, a leaderless, citizen movement, about 175,000 people protested on September 10, also against Bayrou’s budget measures. The demonstrations were largely endorsed by leftist political parties.

Protesters blocked highways and mounted barricades across the country. More than 540 people were arrested.

The movement started online as young people on social media called for a nationwide shutdown. They began circulating hashtags like #boycott, #disobedience and #solidarity on social media sites in July and August. The Block Everything movement has been compared to the widespread Yellow Vest protests held from November 2018 to June 2019 when protesters marched against higher fuel costs imposed by Macron’s government in weekly demonstrations.

Protestors demonstrate in Strasbourg, eastern France during a day of nationwide strikes and protests [FREDERICK FLORIN / AFP]
Protestors demonstrate in Strasbourg, eastern France on September 18, 2025, during a day of nationwide strikes and protests called by unions over France’s national budget [Frederick Florin/AFP]

What next?

Trade unions said they would not back down unless changes are made and the austerity measures are thrown out.

Meanwhile, Lecornu met with some opposition parties on Wednesday to rally support for his budget.

After Lecornu’s meeting with the leftist Socialist Party, which has 66 members in parliament, party head Olivier Faure said the prime minister had been vague about his intentions. The party had earlier proposed an alternative budget that would see business subsidies cut and wealthier households taxed more.

“The prime minister gives the impression that he doesn’t know which direction he wants to go,” Faure told local broadcaster TFI. “If we were to vote today, we would vote for no confidence.”

Lecornu is also lobbying for support from the 210 centre-right lawmakers, who form part of a so-called central bloc.

Who can stop Israel’s genocide in Gaza?

Can anyone stop Israel from starting a genocide in Gaza, despite the fact that a UN inquiry may have revealed that it is doing so?

Israel is accused of killing the Palestinians in a genocide, according to an independent UN commission.

The crimes that constitute the crime include mass murder, injuries, infrastructure destruction, and the development of unlivable conditions.

Israeli ministers’ statements have clearly demonstrated their intentions, according to the commission.

It has demanded that Israel halt its genocide and that the rest of the world stop funding it through the sale of weapons.

What does this indicate about the institutions of the world community?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan

Guests:

International human rights lawyer and co-founder of Al-Haq, Jonathan Kuttab.

Mouin Rabbani, coeditor of Jadaliya and political analyst.

Ukraine pledges to bolster Polish drone defence with training

According to the defense ministers of the nations, Ukraine has agreed to provide training for Polish soldiers and engineers in drone defense.

Polish Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz stated at a press conference in Kyiv that Poland would sign a cooperation agreement with the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and that the training would take place in Lipa, a small town in southern Poland, on Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

As Kosiniak-Kamysz sat next to him, Ukrainian Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal said, “We are talking about training engineers and soldiers who will stand up to and defend the air domain.”

This is only the tip of what allows us to defend our sky together, Shmyhal continued. “We are not only talking about interceptor drones.”

More than 20 drones were shot down by Polish and NATO forces in violation of Ukrainian airspace during a Russian airstrike on neighboring Ukraine a week prior to the announcement.

To defeat those drones, fighter jets launched missiles, which is much more expensive than Russia’s purchase of and production of cheap, mass-produced drones.

Russia claimed that its forces were attacking Ukraine at the time of the drone strike and that they had no intention of hitting Polish targets.

Ukraine claims to be the only country in the world that can safely defend itself from large-scale Russian drone attacks using a multilayered system of interceptor drones, heavy machineguns, and electronic warfare.

Poland can see what might be heading its way because Ukraine, according to Shmyhal, will also grant access to some of its surveillance systems for Russian aerial targets.

Polish forces would have to learn the “ecosystem” of how to intercept unmanned enemy aerial vehicles, from tracking them to jamming them with interceptor drones, he said.

The Disappearance of Dr Abu Safiya

The illegal arrest of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya and the assault on Kamal Adwan Hospital by Israeli forces is being investigated by Fault Lines.

Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya has been the chief operating officer of Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza for more than 20 years. Despite having many options to leave, he decided to remain close to his patients despite the rise of Israeli attacks.

The toll grew worse each month. His son was killed, his hospital was repeatedly attacked, and his life was in danger. He remained at Kamal Adwan as a result. A white-clad lone pediatrician strutting his stuff in front of Israeli forces was filmed in a 10-second video. It represents defiance in the world. It showed who he always was to his family and coworkers.

Hospitals were both sanctuaries and targets by the end of 2024 as Israel’s campaign to drive Palestinians out of northern Gaza grew. The focal point of that campaign was Kala Adwan, a 300-bed facility that had been suffering from shortages and bombardment.

240 staff members and patients were detained, stripped, and rendered the hospital inoperable on December 27, 2024 as a result of Israeli forces’ storm of the hospital. Abu Safiya, who refused to leave his post, was assaulted and taken into custody in violation of Israel’s “Unlawful Combatants Law” without any charges or release date.

US right shifts tone on social media censorship after Charlie Kirk’s murder

Conservatives have criticized US tech companies for years for censoring speech on social media.

Many conservatives are now under pressure to censor content on social media sites because of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Last week, Kirk’s death at a speaking engagement in Utah resulted in a slew of unfavorable online comments about the activist, from insults to morbid celebrations.

Millions of viewers were exposed to the bloody images of Kirk’s final moments as graphic footage of his murder ricocheted across platforms.

Republican House Representative Anna Paulina Luna pleaded with Meta, X, and TikTok to remove any videos of Kirk’s death in the wake of the shooting, stating that “social media begins to desensitize humanity at some point.”

Republican governor of Utah Spencer Cox criticized social media as a “cancer” that had “directly played a role” in each recent assassination or attempted assassination.

Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana promised to use his influence to “mandate an immediate ban for every post or commenter that belittles” the assassination.

After the chat app Discord on Monday confirmed that the suspected killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, appeared to have accepted responsibility for the crime in a message sent to other users, a heated debate erupted over the role of social media.

A Republican-led US House of Representatives committee on Wednesday announced that it had asked the CEOs of Discord, Steam, Twitch, and Reddit to testify at a hearing on the “radicalization of online forum users” in October.

Some political right, which had previously criticized the alleged censorship of posts about topics ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to the US Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, are at a change as a result of the social media reaction to Kirk’s death.

A hearing on “protecting speech from government interference and social media bias” was held in 2023 by the same Republican-led committee that was looking into the Discord and other platforms after Twitter removed a news report about Hunter Biden’s son, who was then-President,’s laptop.

In response to the political upheaval of Donald Trump and the fallout from Brexit, tech companies have since adopted looser moderation in response to shifting political trends.

After tech billionaire Elon Musk bought the platform in 2022, X, formerly known as Twitter, reduced its fact-checking and content-moderation efforts.

Meta announced the end of its third-party fact-checking initiative in January, claiming that its previous content moderation efforts had “gone too far.”

It is unclear what changes, if any, they might try to implement despite the change in the tone of Republicans’ rhetoric regarding free speech and social media.

After Kirk’s passing, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson referred to social media as a political “toxin.” He has not yet introduced any legislation in this area.

On Monday, US Attorney General Pam Bondi made a pledge to use her Department of Justice to combat “hate speech,” a practice that is not permitted by the US Constitution.

In response to a backlash, including from prominent conservatives, Bondi later clarified that officials would concentrate on incitement and violent threats.

Trump, a frequent user of social media, has expressed conflicting opinions about the situation, telling reporters this week that while online platforms may turn “cancerous,” they might also turn out to be “great.”

Republicans who have backed the firing of numerous people deemed to have reacted insensitively to Kirk’s murder made the point that the US Constitution provides broad speech protections under the First Amendment but does not prohibit private companies from firing their employees over their online comments.

Jimmy Kimmel’s long-running TV show “indefinitely” was suspended by ABC on Wednesday for a monologue suggesting that the suspect in Kirk’s murder was a member of Trump’s MAGA movement.

Kimmel’s suspension came after the FCC chair suggested ABC could face regulatory action for the host’s remarks, blurring the lines between the private sector and government efforts to censor speech.

On Wednesday, September 10, 2025, Cecilia Garcia and Dawn Thomas of Westminster, California, react as they discover Charlie Kirk being shot at a college event in Utah.

According to John Wihbey, director of the AI-Media Strategies Lab at Northeastern University, “The attorney general herself made comments about limiting hate speech online that have actually caused a backlash from other conservatives.”

Conservatives are reportedly conflicted about the policy implications of a terrible online event, which makes this controversy materially different from prior ones in this area.

Instead of responding to questions about whether their content moderation practices would change following Kirk’s death, Meta, X, and Reddit instead pointed Al Jazeera to their already-existing moderation practices.

Those include removing violent or graphic content and labeling it as glorifying, incite, or call for violence, and some other things.

A Meta spokesperson said that we are age-gating graphic videos to adults and putting them on a warning screen.

According to a Reddit spokesperson, the company “reached out to ensure moderators understand and abide by our Moderator Code of Conduct” as well as the Reddit Rules.

Requests for comment were not responded to by Bluesky, Discord, YouTube, or Snap.

The response to Kirk’s death has more to do with changing political landscapes under Trump, according to Dave Karpf, an associate professor of media and public affairs at George Washington University.

There are no indications that the pendulum should swing back in favor of content moderation. Instead, they want direct purges from the opposition to the regime, Karpf told Al Jazeera.

The government and the platforms used to act as though they had to create processes that were fundamentally fair and neutral, are the fundamental differences. Fundamental fairness or neutrality are of little use in the current government, according to Karpf.

Walcott wins javelin gold as Chopra, Nadeem disappoint at Athletics Worlds

On a rainy night in Tokyo, Trinidad and Tobago’s Keshorn Walcott won the men’s javelin final of the World Athletics Championships 2025 beating India’s Neeraj Chopra and Pakistan’s Arshad Nadeem.

Nadeem, the reigning Olympic champion, and Chopra, the reigning world champion, both looked in poor form at the Japan National Stadium on Thursday when they failed to pass the 85-meter mark.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

With an elevation of 88.16 meters, Trinidad and Tobago’s Walcott won his first global title since 2012’s teen gold medal at the Olympics.

The 32-year-old won his first world championship medal in addition to his 2012 gold and bronze medal at the 2016 Rio Olympics by dominating the competition in a blustery breeze, producing the two longest throws of the evening.

Anderson Peters of Grenada won silver medals at the 2019 and 2022 world championships in a good night for the Caribbean, placing him second with a throw of 87.38m.

Curtis Thompson won the bronze medal in the event’s opening throw of 86.67m, marking the United States’ first world championship victory since Breaux Greer in 2007.

Chopra, who had a best attempt of 84.03m and finished eighth, struggled to reach the site of his 2021 Olympic triumph, and made no fairytale comeback.

Nadeem from Pakistan, who has been out for much of the season, also had a disappointing evening, placing 10th overall with an best throw of 82.75m.

With a personal best of 86.27m on his first attempt, Sachin Yadav placed fourth ahead of Julian Weber, restoring pride for India.

The German, who had a best throw of 86.11m, was a distant second-place finisher behind the world-leading 91.51m he recorded in the Diamond League final in Zurich last month.

Julius Yego, a 36-year-old world champion from Kenya, injured himself on his third time and was unable to win.